This specification is related to the following patents, each of which is incorporated by reference herein: U.S. Pat. No. 8,887,810 issued Nov. 18, 2014; U.S. Pat. No. 8,674,274 issued Mar. 18, 2014; U.S. Pat. No. 8,101,068 issued Jan. 24, 2012; U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,384 issued Mar. 13, 2012; U.S. Pat. No. 8,494,775 issued Jul. 23, 2013; U.S. Pat. No. 8,729,440 issued May 20, 2014; U.S. Pat. No. 8,120,369 issued Feb. 21, 2012 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,128,786 issued Mar. 6, 2012.
The disclosure concerns a method for heating materials by application of radio frequency (“RF”) energy, also known as electromagnetic energy. In particular, the disclosure concerns an advantageous method for RF heating of materials with a low or zero electric dissipation factor, magnetic dissipation factor, and electrical conductivity, such as petroleum ore. For example, the disclosure enables efficient, low-cost heating of bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, or heavy oil.
The disclosure concerns a method for heating materials by application of radio frequency (“RF”) energy, also known as electromagnetic energy. In particular, the disclosure concerns an advantageous method for RF heating of materials with a low or zero electric dissipation factor, magnetic dissipation factor, and electrical conductivity, such as petroleum ore. For example, the disclosure enables efficient, low-cost heating of bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, or heavy oil.
Bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, and heavy oil are typically found as naturally occurring mixtures of sand or clay and dense and viscous petroleum. Recently, due to depletion of the world's oil reserves, higher oil prices, and increases in demand, efforts have been made to extract and refine these types of petroleum ore as an alternative petroleum source. Because of the extremely high viscocity of bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, and heavy oil, however, the drilling and refinement methods used in extracting standard crude oil are typically not available. Therefore, bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, and heavy oil are typically extracted by strip mining, or in situ techniques are used to reduce the viscocity of viscocity by injecting steam or solvents in a well so that the material can be pumped. Under either approach, however, the material extracted from these deposits can be a viscous, solid or semisolid form that does not easily flow at normal oil pipeline temperatures, making it difficult to transport to market and expensive to process into gasoline, diesel fuel, and other products. Typically, the material is prepared for transport by adding hot water and caustic soda (NaOH) to the sand, which produces a slurry that can be piped to the extraction plant, where it is agitated and crude bitumen oil froth is skimmed from the top. In addition, the material is typically processed with heat to separate oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, or heavy oil into more viscous bitumen crude oil, and to distill, crack, or refine the bitumen crude oil into usable petroleum products.
The conventional methods of heating bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, and heavy oil suffer from numerous drawbacks. For example, the conventional methods typically utilize large amounts of water, and also large amounts of energy. Moreover, using conventional methods, it has been difficult to achieve uniform and rapid heating, which has limited successful processing of bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, and heavy oil. It can be desirable, both for environmental reasons and efficiency/cost reasons to reduce or eliminate the amount of water used in processing bituminous ore, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, and heavy oil, and also provide a method of heating that is efficient and environmentally friendly, which is suitable for post-excavation processing of the bitumen, oil sands, oil shale, tar sands, and heavy oil.
One potential alternative heating method is RF heating. “RF” is most broadly defined here to include any portion of the electromagnetic spectrum having a longer wavelength than visible light. Wikipedia provides a definition of “radio frequency” as comprehending the range of from 3 Hz to 300 GHz, and defines the following sub ranges of frequencies:
“RF heating,” then, is most broadly defined here as the heating of a material, substance, or mixture by exposure to RF energy. For example, microwave ovens are a well-known example of RF heating.
The nature and suitability of RF heating depends on several factors. In general, most materials accept electromagnetic waves, but the degree to which RF heating occurs varies widely. RF heating is dependent on the frequency of the electromagnetic energy, intensity of the electromagnetic energy, proximity to the source of the electromagnetic energy, conductivity of the material to be heated, and whether the material to be heated is magnetic or non-magnetic. Pure hydrocarbon molecules are substantially nonconductive, of low dielectric loss factor and nearly zero magnetic moment. Thus, pure hydrocarbon molecules themselves are only fair susceptors for RF heating, e.g. they may heat only slowly in the presence of RF fields. For example, the dissipation factor D of aviation gasoline may be 0.0001 and distilled water 0.157 at 3 GHz, such that RF fields apply heat 1570 times faster to the water in emulsion to oil. (“Dielectric materials and Applications”, A. R. Von Hippel Editor, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1954).
Thus far, RF heating has not been a suitable replacement for conventional processing methods of petroleum ore such as bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, and heavy oil. Dry petroleum ore itself does not heat well when exposed to RF energy. Dry petroleum ore possesses low dielectric dissipation factors (ε″), low (or zero) magnetic dissipation factors (μ″), and low or zero conductivity. Moreover, while water may provide some susceptance at temperatures below 212° F. (100° C.), it is generally unsuitable as a susceptor at higher temperatures, and may be an undesirable additive to petroleum ore, for environmental, cost, and efficiency reasons.
An aspect of the present invention is a method for RF heating of materials with a low or zero dielectric dissipation factor, magnetic dissipation factor, and electrical conductivity. For example, the present invention may be used for RF heating of petroleum ore, such as bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, oil shale, or heavy oil. An exemplary embodiment of the present method comprises first mixing about 10% to about 99% by volume of a substance such as petroleum ore with about 1% to about 50% by volume of a substance comprising susceptor particles. The mixture is then subjected to a radio frequency in a manner which creates heating of the susceptor particles. The radio frequency can be applied for a sufficient time to allow the susceptor particles to heat the surrounding substance through conduction, so that the average temperature of the mixture can be greater than about 212° F. (100° C.). After the mixture has achieved the desired temperature, the radio frequency can be discontinued, and substantially all of the susceptor particles can optionally be removed, resulting in a heated substance that can be substantially free of the susceptor particles used in the RF heating process.
Other aspects of the invention will be apparent from this disclosure.
The subject matter of this disclosure will now be described more fully, and one or more embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are examples of the invention, which has the full scope indicated by the language of the claims.
In an exemplary method, a method for heating a petroleum ore such as bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, oil shale, or heavy oil using RF energy is provided.
Petroleum Ore
The presently disclosed method can be utilized to either heat a petroleum ore that has been extracted from the earth, prior to distillation, cracking, or separation processing, or can be used as part of a distillation, cracking, or separation process. The petroleum ore can comprise, for example, bituminous ore, oil sands, tar sands, oil shale, or heavy oil that has been extracted via strip-mining or drilling. If the extracted petroleum ore is a solid or includes solids with a volume greater than about 1 cubic centimeter, the petroleum ore can be crushed, ground, or milled to a slurry, powder, or small-particulate state prior to RF heating. The petroleum ore can comprise water, but alternatively contains less than 10%, less than 5%, or less than 1% by volume of water. Most preferably, the petroleum ore can be substantially free of added water.
The petroleum ore used in the present method is typically non-magnetic or low-magnetic, and non-conductive or low-conductive. Therefore, the petroleum ore alone is not generally suitable for RF heating. For example, exemplary petroleum ore when dry, e.g. free from water, may have a dielectric dissipation factor (ε″) less than about 0.01, 0.001, or 0.0001 at 3000 MHz. Exemplary petroleum ore may also have a negligible magnetic dissipation factor (μ″), and the exemplary petroleum ore may also have an electrical conductivity of less than 0.01, 0.001, or 0.0001 S·m−1 at 20° C. The presently disclosed methods, however, are not limited to petroleum products with any specific magnetic or conductive properties, and can be useful to RF heat substances with a higher dielectric dissipation factors (ε″), magnetic dissipation factor (μ″), or electrical conductivity. The presently disclosed methods are also not limited to petroleum ore, but are widely applicable to RF heating of any substance that has dielectric dissipation factor (ε″) less than about 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001 at 3000 MHz. It is also applicable to RF heating of any substance that has have a negligible magnetic dissipation factor (μ″), or an electrical conductivity of less than 0.01 S˜m−1, 1×10−4 S·m−1, or 1×10−6 S·m−1 at 20° C.
Susceptor Particles
The presently disclosed method utilizes one or more susceptor materials in conjunction with the petroleum ore to provide improved RF heating. A “susceptor” is herein defined as any material which absorbs electromagnetic energy and transforms it to heat. Susceptors have been suggested for applications such as microwave food packing, thin-films, thermosetting adhesives, RF-absorbing polymers, and heat-shrinkable tubing. Examples of susceptor materials are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,378,879; 6,649,888; 6,045,648; 6,348,679; and 4,892,782, which are incorporated by reference herein.
In the presently disclosed method, the one or more susceptors are for example in the form of susceptor particles. The susceptor particles can be provided as a powder, granular substance, flakes, fibers, beads, chips, colloidal suspension, or in any other suitable form whereby the average volume of the susceptor particles can be less than about 10 cubic mm. For example, the average volume of the susceptor particles can be less than about 5 cubic mm, 1 cubic mm, or 0.5 cubic mm. Alternatively, the average volume of the susceptor particles can be less than about 0.1 cubic mm, 0.01 cubic mm, or 0.001 cubic mm. For example, the susceptor particles can be nanoparticles with an average particle volume from 1×10−9 cubic mm to 1×10−6 cubic mm, 1×10−7 cubic mm, or 1×10−8 cubic mm.
Depending on the preferred RF heating mode, the susceptor particles can comprise conductive particles, magnetic particles, or polar material particles. Exemplary conductive particles include metal, powdered iron (pentacarbonyl E iron), iron oxide, or powdered graphite. Exemplary magnetic materials include ferromagnetic materials include iron, nickel, cobalt, iron alloys, nickel alloys, cobalt alloys, and steel, or ferromagnetic materials such as magnetite, nickel-zinc ferrite, manganese-zinc ferrite, and copper-zinc ferrite. Exemplary polar materials include butyl rubber (such as ground tires), barium titanate powder, aluminum oxide powder, or PVC flour.
Mixing of Petroleum Ore and Susceptor Particles
Preferably, a mixing or dispersion step is provided, whereby a composition comprising the susceptor particles is mixed or dispersed in the petroleum ore. The mixing step can occur after the petroleum ore has been crushed, ground, or milled, or in conjunction with the crushing, grinding, or milling of the petroleum ore. The mixing step can be conducted using any suitable method or apparatus that disperses the susceptor particles in a substantially uniform manner. For example, a sand mill, cement mixer, continuous soil mixer, or similar equipment can be used.
An advantageous capability of the presently disclosed methods can be the fact that large amounts of susceptor particles can optionally be used without negatively affecting the chemical or material properties of the processed petroleum ore. Therefore, a composition comprising susceptor particles can for example be mixed with the petroleum ore in amount from about 1% to about 50% by volume of the total mixture. Alternatively, the composition comprising susceptor particles comprises from about 1% to about 25% by volume of the total mixture, or about 1% to about 10% by volume of the total mixture.
Radio Frequency Heating
After the susceptor particle composition has been mixed in the petroleum ore, the mixture can be heated using RF energy. An RF source can be provided which applies RF energy to cause the susceptor particles to generate heat. The heat generated by the susceptor particles causes the overall mixture to heat by conduction. The preferred RF frequency, power, and source proximity vary in different embodiments depending on the properties of the petroleum ore, the susceptor particle selected, and the desired mode of RF heating.
In one exemplary embodiment, RF energy can be applied in a manner that causes the susceptor particles to heat by induction. Induction heating involves applying an RF field to electrically conducting materials to create electromagnetic induction. An eddy current is created when an electrically conducting material is exposed to a changing magnetic field due to relative motion of the field source and conductor; or due to variations of the field with time. This can cause a circulating flow or current of electrons within the conductor. These circulating eddies of current create electromagnets with magnetic fields that opposes the change of the magnetic field according to Lenz's law. These eddy currents generate heat. The degree of heat generated in turn, depends on the strength of the RF field, the electrical conductivity of the heated material, and the change rate of the RF field. There can be also a relationship between the frequency of the RF field and the depth to which it penetrate the material; in general, higher RF frequencies generate a higher heat rate.
Induction RF heating can be for example carried out using conductive susceptor particles. Exemplary susceptors for induction RF heating include powdered metal, powdered iron (pentacarbonyl E iron), iron oxide, or powdered graphite. The RF source used for induction RF heating can be for example a loop antenna or magnetic near-field applicator suitable for generation of a magnetic field. The RF source typically comprises an electromagnet through which a high-frequency alternating current (AC) is passed. For example, the RF source can comprise an induction heating coil, a chamber or container containing a loop antenna, or a magnetic near-field applicator. The exemplary RF frequency for induction RF heating can be from about 50 Hz to about 3 GHz. Alternatively, the RF frequency can be from about 10 kHz to about 10 MHz, 10 MHz to about 100 MHZ, or 100 MHz to about 2.5 GHz. The power of the RF energy, as radiated from the RF source, can be for example from about 100 KW to about 2.5 MW, alternatively from about 500 KW to about 1 MW, and alternatively, about 1 MW to about 2.5 MW.
In another exemplary embodiment, RF energy can be applied in a manner that causes the susceptor particles to heat by magnetic moment heating, also known as hysteresis heating. Magnetic moment heating is a form of induction RF heating, whereby heat is generated by a magnetic material. Applying a magnetic field to a magnetic material induces electron spin realignment, which results in heat generation. Magnetic materials are easier to induction heat than non-magnetic materials, because magnetic materials resist the rapidly changing magnetic fields of the RF source. The electron spin realignment of the magnetic material produces hysteresis heating in addition to eddy current heating. A metal which offers high resistance has high magnetic permeability from 100 to 500; non-magnetic materials have a permeability of 1. One advantage of magnetic moment heating can be that it can be self-regulating. Magnetic moment heating only occurs at temperatures below the Curie point of the magnetic material, the temperature at which the magnetic material loses its magnetic properties.
Magnetic moment RF heating can be performed using magnetic susceptor particles. Exemplary susceptors for magnetic moment RF heating include ferromagnetic materials or ferromagnetic materials. Exemplary ferromagnetic materials include iron, nickel, cobalt, iron alloys, nickel alloys, cobalt alloys, and steel. Exemplary ferromagnetic materials include magnetite, nickel-zinc ferrite, manganese-zinc ferrite, and copper-zinc ferrite. In certain embodiments, the RF source used for magnetic moment RF heating can be the same as that used for induction heating—a loop antenna or magnetic near-field applicator suitable for generation of a magnetic field, such as an induction heating coil, a chamber or container containing a loop antenna, or a magnetic near-field applicator. The exemplary RF frequency for magnetic moment RF heating can be from about 100 kHz to about 3 GHz. Alternatively, the RF frequency can be from about 10 kHz to about 10 MHz, 10 MHz to about 100 MHZ, or 100 MHz to about 2.5 GHz. The power of the RF energy, as radiated from the RF source, can be for example from about 100 KW to about 2.5 MW, alternatively from about 500 KW to about 1 MW, and alternatively, about 1 MW to about 2.5 MW.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the RF energy source and susceptor particles selected can result in dielectric heating. Dielectric heating involves the heating of electrically insulating materials by dielectric loss. Voltage across a dielectric material causes energy to be dissipated as the molecules attempt to line up with the continuously changing electric field.
Dielectric RF heating can be for example performed using polar, non-conductive susceptor particles. Exemplary susceptors for dielectric heating include butyl rubber (such as ground tires), barium titanate, aluminum oxide, or PVC. Water can also be used as a dielectric RF susceptor, but due to environmental, cost, and processing concerns, in certain embodiments it may be desirable to limit or even exclude water in processing of petroleum ore. Dielectric RF heating typically utilizes higher RF frequencies than those used for induction RF heating. At frequencies above 100 MHz an electromagnetic wave can be launched from a small dimension emitter and conveyed through space. The material to be heated can therefore be placed in the path of the waves, without a need for electrical contacts. For example, domestic microwave ovens principally operate through dielectric heating, whereby the RF frequency applied is about 2.45 GHz. The RF source used for dielectric RF heating can be for example a dipole antenna or electric near field applicator. An exemplary RF frequency for dielectric RF heating can be from about 100 MHz to about 3 GHz. Alternatively, the RF frequency can be from about 500 MHz to about 3 GHz. Alternatively, the RF frequency can be from about 2 GHz to about 3 GHz. The power of the RF energy, as radiated from the RF source, can be for example from about 100 KW to about 2.5 MW, alternatively from about 500 KW to about 1 MW, and alternatively, about 1 MW to about 2.5 MW.
The reflection of incident RF energy such as an incident electromagnetic wave can reduce the effectiveness of RF heating. It may be desirable for the RF fields or electromagnetic waves to enter the materials and susceptors to dissipate. Thus, in one embodiment the susceptor particles can have the property of equal permeability and permittivity, e.g. μr=εr to eliminate wave reflections at an air-susceptor interfaces. This can be explained as follows: wave reflections occur according to the change in characteristic impedance at the material interfaces: mathematically r=(Z1−Z2)/(Z1+Z2) where Γ is the reflection coefficient and Z1 and Z1 are the characteristic or wave impedances of the individual materials 1 and 2. Whenever Z1=Z2 zero reflection occurs. As the characteristic wave impedance of a material is Z=120π(√μr/εr), whenever μr=εr, Z=120π=377 ohms. In turn, there would be no wave reflection for that material at an air interface, as air is also Z=377 ohms. An example of a isoimpedance magnetodielectric (μr≡εr) susceptor material, without reflection to air, is light nickel zinc ferrite which can have μr=εr=14. As background, other than refractive properties, nonconductive materials of μ≡εr may be invisible in the electromagnetic spectrum where this occurs. With sufficient conductivity, μr≡εr susceptor materials have excellent RF heating properties for high speed and efficiency.
The susceptor particles may be proportioned in the hydrocarbon ore to obtain μr≡εr from the mixture overall, for reduced reflections at air interface and increased heating speed. The logarithmic mixing formula log εm′=θ1 log ε1′+θ2 log ε2′ may be used to adjust the permittivity of the mixture overall by the volume ratios e of the components and the permittivities E of components, 1 and 2. In the case of semiconducting susceptor particles the size, shape, and distribution of particles may however affect the material polarizability and some empiricism may be required. The paper “The Properties Of A Dielectric Containing Semiconducting Particles Of Various Shapes”, R. W. Sillars, Journal of The Institution Of Electrical Engineers (Great Britain), Vol. 80, April 1937, No. 484 may also be consulted.
In another embodiment of the present invention, pentacarbonyl E iron powder is advantageous as a magnetic (H) field susceptor. In the pentacarbonyl, E iron powder embodiment, iron susceptor powder particles in the 2 to 8 micron range are utilized. A specific manufacture is type EW (mechanically hard CIP grade, silicated 97.0% Fe, 3 um avg. particle size) by BASF Corporation, Ludwigshafen, Germany (www.inorganics.BASF.com). This powder may also be produced by GAF Corporation at times in the United States. Irrespective of manufacture, sufficiently small bare iron particles (EQ) are washed in 75 percent phosphoric acid (“Ospho” by Marine Enterprises Inc.) to provide an insulative oxide outer finish, FePO4. In other words, the susceptor particles may be conductive susceptor particles having an insulative coating. The iron powder susceptors have a low conductivity together in bulk and small particle size such that RF magnetic fields are penetrative. The susceptor powder particles must be small relative the radio frequency skin depth, e.g. particle diameter d<√(λ/nσμc) where wavelength is the wavelength in air, σ is conductivity of iron, μ is the permeability of the iron, and c is the speed of light.
The susceptor particles need not be solids, and in another embodiment liquid water may be used. The water can be mixed with or suspended in emulsion with the petroleum ore. The dissipation factor of pure, distilled water is provided as
In yet another embodiment, the RF energy source used can be far-field RF energy, and the susceptor particles selected act as mini-dipole antennas that generate heat. One property of a dipole antenna is that it can convert RF waves to electrical current. The material of the dipole antenna, therefore, can be selected such that it resistively heats under an electrical current. Mini-dipole RF heating can be preferably performed using carbon fiber, carbon fiber floc, or carbon fiber cloth (e.g., carbon fiber squares) susceptors. Carbon fibers or carbon fiber floc preferably are less than 5 cm long and less than 0.5 MW.
In each of the presently exemplary embodiments, RF energy can be applied for a sufficient time to allow the heated susceptor particles to heat the surrounding hydrocarbon oil, ore, or sand. For example, RF energy can be applied for sufficient time so that the average temperature of the mixture can be greater than about 212° F. (100° C.). Alternatively, RF energy can be applied until the average temperature of the mixture is, for example, greater than 300° F. (150° C.), or 400° F. (200° C.). Alternatively, RF energy can be applied until the average temperature of the mixture is, for example, greater than 700° F. (400° C.). In a variation on the exemplary embodiment the RF energy can be applied as part of a distillation or cracking process, whereby the mixture can be heated above the pyrolysis temperature of the hydrocarbon in order to break complex molecules such as kerogens or heavy hydrocarbons into simpler molecules (e.g. light hydrocarbons). It is presently believed that the suitable length of time for application of RF energy in the presently disclosed embodiments can be preferably from about 15 seconds, 30 seconds, or 1 minute to about 10 minutes, 30 minutes, or 1 hour. After the hydrocarbon/susceptor mixture has achieved the desired average temperature, exposure of the mixture to the radio frequency can be discontinued. For example, the RF source can be turned off or halted, or the mixture can be removed from the RF source.
Removal/Reuse of Susceptor Particles
In certain embodiments, the present disclosure also contemplates the ability to remove the susceptor particles after the hydrocarbon/susceptor mixture has achieved the desired average temperature.
If the susceptor particles are left in the mixture, in certain embodiments this may undesirably alter the chemical and material properties of primary substance. One alternative is to use a low volume fraction of susceptor, if any. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,879 describes the use of permanent susceptors in finished articles, such as heat-shrinkable tubing, thermosetting adhesives, and gels, and states that articles loaded with particle percentages above 15% are generally not preferred, and in fact, are achievable in the context of that patent only by using susceptors having relatively lower aspect ratios. The present disclosure provides the alternative of removing the susceptors after RF heating. By providing the option of removing the susceptors after RF heating, the present disclosure can reduce or eliminate undesirable altering of the chemical or material properties of the petroleum ore, while allowing a large volume fraction of susceptors to be used. The susceptor particle composition can thus function as a temporary heating substance, as opposed to a permanent additive.
Removal of the susceptor particle composition can vary depending on the type of susceptor particles used and the consistency, viscocity, or average particle size of the mixture. If necessary or desirable, removal of the susceptor particles can be performed in conjunction with an additional mixing step. If a magnetic or conductive susceptor particle is used, substantially all of the susceptor particles can be removed with one or more magnets, such as quiescent or direct-current magnets. In the case of a polar dielectric susceptor, substantially all of the susceptor particles can be removed through flotation or centrifuging. Carbon fiber, carbon floc, or carbon fiber cloth susceptors can be removed through flotation, centrifuging, or filtering. For example, removal of the susceptor particles can be performed either while the petroleum ore/susceptor mixture is still being RF heated, or within a sufficient time after RF heating has been stopped so that the temperature of the petroleum ore decreases by no more than 30%, and alternatively, no more than 10%. For example, it is exemplary that the petroleum ore maintain an average temperature of greater than 200° F. (93° C.) during any removal of the susceptor particles, alternatively an average temperature of greater than 200° F. (93° C.).
Another advantage of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can be that the susceptor particles can optionally be reused after they are removed from a heated mixture.
Alternatively, in certain instances it may be appropriate to leave some or all of the susceptor particles in some or all of the material of the mixture after processing. For example, if the particles are elemental carbon, which is non-hazardous and inexpensive, it may be useful to leave the particles in the mixture after heating, to avoid the cost of removal. For another example, a petroleum ore with added susceptor material can be pyrolyzed to drive off useful lighter fractions of petroleum, which are collected in vapor form essentially free of the susceptor material, while the bottoms remaining after pyrolysis may contain the susceptor and be used or disposed of without removing the susceptor.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The following examples illustrate several of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. The examples are provided as small-scale laboratory confirmation examples. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, based on the foregoing detailed description, how to conduct the following exemplary methods on an industrial scale.
A sample of ¼ cup of Athabasca oil sand was obtained at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.). The sample was contained in a Pyrex glass container. A GE DE68-0307A microwave oven was used to heat the sample at 1 KW at 2450 MHz for 30 seconds (100% power for the microwave oven). The resulting average temperature after heating was 125° F. (51° C.).
A sample of ¼ cup of Athabasca oil sand was obtained at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.). The sample was contained in a Pyrex glass container. 1 Tablespoon of nickel zinc ferrite nanopowder (PPT # FP350 CAS 1309-31-1) at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.) was added to the Athabasca oil sand and uniformly mixed. A GE DE68-0307A microwave oven was used to heat the mixture at 1 KW at 2450 MHz for 30 seconds (100% power for the microwave oven). The resulting average temperature of the mixture after heating was 196° F. (91° C.).
A sample of ¼ cup of Athabasca oil sand is obtained at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.). The sample is contained in a Pyrex glass container. 1 Tablespoon of powdered pentacarbonyl E iron at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.) is added to the Athabasca oil sand and uniformly mixed. A GE DE68-0307A microwave oven is used to heat the mixture at 1 KW at 2450 MHz for 30 seconds (100% power for the microwave oven). The resulting average temperature of the mixture after heating will be greater than the resulting average temperature achieved using the method of Example 1.
A sample of ¼ cup of Athabasca oil sand is obtained at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.). The sample is contained in a Pyrex glass container. 1 Tablespoon of butyl rubber (such as ground tire rubber) at an average temperature of 72° F. (22° C.) is added to the Athabasca oil sand and uniformly mixed. A GE DE68-0307A microwave oven is used to heat the mixture at 1 KW at 2450 MHz for 30 seconds (100% power for the microwave oven). The resulting average temperature of the mixture after heating will be greater than the resulting average temperature achieved using the method of Example 1.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2371459 | Mittelmann | Mar 1945 | A |
2411198 | Eltgroth | Nov 1946 | A |
2597276 | Altmann | May 1952 | A |
2685930 | Albaugh | Aug 1954 | A |
2756313 | Cater | Jul 1956 | A |
2871477 | Hatkin | Jan 1959 | A |
2947841 | Pickles | Aug 1960 | A |
3497005 | Pelopsky | Feb 1970 | A |
3848671 | Kern | Nov 1974 | A |
3944910 | Rau | Mar 1976 | A |
3954140 | Hendrick | May 1976 | A |
3988036 | Fisher | Oct 1976 | A |
3991091 | Driscoll | Nov 1976 | A |
4035282 | Stuchberry et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4042487 | Seguchi | Aug 1977 | A |
4087781 | Grossi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4136014 | Vermeulen | Jan 1979 | A |
4140179 | Kasevich et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4140180 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4144935 | Bridges | Mar 1979 | A |
4146125 | Sanford et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4196329 | Rowland et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4295880 | Horner | Oct 1981 | A |
4300219 | Joyal | Nov 1981 | A |
4301865 | Kasevich et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4328324 | Kock | May 1982 | A |
4373581 | Toellner | Feb 1983 | A |
4396062 | Iskander | Aug 1983 | A |
4404123 | Chu | Sep 1983 | A |
4410216 | Allen | Oct 1983 | A |
4425227 | Smith | Jan 1984 | A |
4449585 | Bridges et al. | May 1984 | A |
4456065 | Heim | Jun 1984 | A |
4457365 | Kasevich et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4470459 | Copland | Sep 1984 | A |
4485869 | Sresty | Dec 1984 | A |
4487257 | Dauphine | Dec 1984 | A |
4508168 | Heeren | Apr 1985 | A |
4514305 | Filby | Apr 1985 | A |
4524827 | Bridges | Jun 1985 | A |
4531468 | Simon | Jul 1985 | A |
4583586 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4620593 | Haagensen | Nov 1986 | A |
4622496 | Dattili | Nov 1986 | A |
4645585 | White | Feb 1987 | A |
4678034 | Eastlund | Jul 1987 | A |
4703433 | Sharrit | Oct 1987 | A |
4704581 | Clark | Nov 1987 | A |
4790375 | Bridges | Dec 1988 | A |
4817711 | Jeambey | Apr 1989 | A |
4882984 | Eves, II | Nov 1989 | A |
4892782 | Fisher et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4968726 | Thorsrud | Nov 1990 | A |
4975164 | Ravella et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5046559 | Glandt | Sep 1991 | A |
5055180 | Klaila | Oct 1991 | A |
5065819 | Kasevich | Nov 1991 | A |
5082054 | Kiamanesh | Jan 1992 | A |
5136249 | White | Aug 1992 | A |
5198826 | Ito | Mar 1993 | A |
5199488 | Kasevich | Apr 1993 | A |
5233306 | Misra | Aug 1993 | A |
5236039 | Edelstein | Aug 1993 | A |
5251700 | Nelson | Oct 1993 | A |
5293936 | Bridges | Mar 1994 | A |
5304767 | MacGaffigan | Apr 1994 | A |
5315561 | Grossi | May 1994 | A |
5370477 | Bunin | Dec 1994 | A |
5378879 | Monovoukas | Jan 1995 | A |
5506592 | MacDonald | Apr 1996 | A |
5582854 | Nosaka | Dec 1996 | A |
5621844 | Bridges | Apr 1997 | A |
5631562 | Cram | May 1997 | A |
5746909 | Calta | May 1998 | A |
5910287 | Cassin | Jun 1999 | A |
5923299 | Brown et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6045648 | Palmgren et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6055213 | Rubbo | Apr 2000 | A |
6063338 | Pham | May 2000 | A |
6097262 | Combellack | Aug 2000 | A |
6106895 | Usuki | Aug 2000 | A |
6110359 | Davis | Aug 2000 | A |
6112273 | Kau | Aug 2000 | A |
6184427 | Klepfer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6229603 | Coassin | May 2001 | B1 |
6232114 | Coassin | May 2001 | B1 |
6301088 | Nakada | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303021 | Winter | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6348679 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360819 | Vinegar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6432365 | Levin | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6501056 | Hirohata | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531881 | Cordes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6603309 | Forgang | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613678 | Sakaguchi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614059 | Tsujimura | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626251 | Sullivan | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6649888 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712136 | De Rouffignac | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6808935 | Levin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6831470 | Xie | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6856140 | Talanov | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6886632 | Raghuraman | May 2005 | B2 |
6923273 | Terry | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932155 | Vinegar | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6967589 | Peters | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6992630 | Parsche | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7046584 | Sorrells | May 2006 | B2 |
7079081 | Parsche et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091460 | Kinzer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109457 | Kinzer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115847 | Kinzer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147057 | Steele | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7172038 | Terry | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7205947 | Parsche | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7312428 | Kinzer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322416 | Burris, II | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337980 | Schaedel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7438807 | Garner et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441597 | Kasevich | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461693 | Considine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484561 | Bridges | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7562708 | Cogliandro | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7623804 | Sone | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631691 | Symington | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639016 | Forgang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665355 | Zhang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694829 | Veltri | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7752906 | Pop | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775099 | Bogath | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8047285 | Smith | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8101068 | White et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8120369 | Hernandez et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128786 | White et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133384 | Parsche | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8494775 | Parsche | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8674274 | Parsche | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8729440 | Parsche | May 2014 | B2 |
8887810 | Parsche | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020032534 | Regier | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040031731 | Honeycutt | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050199386 | Kinzer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274513 | Schultz | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060038083 | Criswell | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070108202 | Kinzer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131591 | Pringle | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137852 | Considine et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137858 | Considine et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070176842 | Brune | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187089 | Bridges | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188397 | Parsche | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070261844 | Cogliandro et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080073079 | Tranquilla et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080111096 | Veltri | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135244 | Miller | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143330 | Madio | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090009410 | Dolgin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090242196 | Pao | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110140702 | Bloemenkamp | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110248900 | De Rochemont | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120067580 | Parsche | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090844 | Madison | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120267095 | Dreher | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1199573 | Jan 1986 | CA |
2678473 | Aug 2009 | CA |
102008022176 | Nov 2009 | DE |
0135966 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0418117 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0563999 | Oct 1993 | EP |
1106672 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1586066 | Feb 1970 | FR |
2925519 | Jun 2009 | FR |
2925519 | Jun 2009 | FR |
56050119 | May 1981 | JP |
2246502 | Oct 1990 | JP |
2007133461 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008011412 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008030337 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008098850 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009027262 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009114934 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in PCT/US2010/025761, dated Feb. 9, 2011, pp. 1-13 See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in PCT/US2010/057090, dated Mar. 3, 2011, pp. 1-10 See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mar. 29, 2006. p. 15853 (http://www.epa.gov/EPA-AIR/2006/March/Day-29/a2315b.htm), pp. 1-13. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Von Hippel, Arthur R., Dielectrics and Waves, Copyright 1954, Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 54-11020, Contents, pp. xi-xii; Chapter II, Section 17, “Polyatomic Molecules”, Appendix C-E, New York, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 150-155, pp. 273-277. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,247, dated Mar. 28, 2011, pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,284, dated Apr. 26, 2011, pp. 1-62. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in PCT/US201 0/025808, dated Apr. 5, 2011, pp. 1-12. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Deutsch, C.V., McLennan, J.A., “The Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Process,” Guide to SAGD (Steam ' Assisted Gravity Drainage) Reservoir Characterization Using Geostatistics, Centre for Computational Statistics (CCG), Guidebook Series, 2005, vol. 3; p. 2, section 1.2, published by Centre for Computational Statistics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, pp. 1-14. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Marcuvitz, Nathan, Waveguide Handbook; 1986; Institution of Engineering and Technology, vol. 21 of IEE Electromagnetic Wave series, ISBN 0863410588, Chapter 1, pp. 1-54, published by Peter Peregrinus Ltd. on behalf of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, © 1986, pp. 1-57. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Marcuvitz, Nathan, Waveguide Handbook; 1986; Institution of Engineering and Technology, vol. 21 of IEE Electromagnetic Wave series, ISBN 0863410588, Chapter 2.3, pp. 66-72, published by Peter Peregrinus Ltd. on behalf of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, © 1986. pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Oil sands.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from the Internet from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oil_sands&printable=yes, Feb. 16, 2009, pp. 1-14. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sahni et al., “Electromagnetic Heating Methods for Heavy Oil Reservoirs.” 2000 Society of Petroleum Engineers SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting, Jun. 19-23, 2000, pp. 1-12. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Power et al., “Froth Treatment: Past, Present & Future.” Oil Sands Symposium, University of Alberta, May 3-5, 2004, pp. 1-29. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Flint, “Bitumen Recovery Technology A Review of Long Term R&D Opportunities.” Jan. 31, 2005. LENEF Consulting (1994) Limited, Part 1, 100 pgs; Part 2, 110 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Froth Flotation.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from the internet from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Froth_flotation, Apr. 7, 2009, pp. 1-6. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Relative static permittivity.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from the Internet from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index/php?title=Relative_static_permittivity&printable=yes, Feb. 12, 2009, pp. 1-3. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Tailings.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from the Internet from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tailings&printable=yes, Feb. 12, 2009, pp. 1-6. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
“Technologies for Enhanced Energy Recovery” Executive Summary, Radio Frequency Dielectric Heating Technologies for Conventional and Non-Conventional Hydrocarbon-Bearing Formulations, Quasar Energy, LLC, Sep. 3, 2009, pp. 1-6. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Burnhan, “Slow Radio-Frequency Processing of Large Oil Shale Volumes to Produce Petroleum-like Shale Oil,” U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Aug. 20, 2003, UCRL-ID-155045, pp. 1-17. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sahni et al., “Electromagnetic Heating Methods for Heavy Oil Reservoirs,” U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, May 1, 2000, UCL-JC-138802, pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Abernethy, “Production Increase of Heavy Oils by Electromagnetic Heating,” The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Jul.-Sep. 1976, pp. 91-97. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sweeney, et al., “Study of Dielectric Properties of Dry and Saturated Green River Oil Shale,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Mar. 26, 2007, revised manuscript Jun. 29, 2007, published on Web Aug. 25, 2007, pp. 1-9. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Kinzer, “Past, Present, and Pending Intellectual Property for Electromagnetic Heating of Oil Shale,” Quasar Energy LLC, 28th Oil Shale Symposium Colorado School of Mines, Oct. 13-15, 2008, pp. 1-18. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Kinzer, “Past, Present, and Pending Intellectual Property for Electromagnetic Heating of Oil Shale,” Quasar Energy LLC, 28th Oil Shale Symposium Colorado School of Mines, Oct. 13-15, 2008, pp. 1-33. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Kinzer, A Review of Notable Intellectual Property for In Situ Electromagnetic Heating of Oil Shale, Quasar Energy LLC, 2009, p. 1. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
A. Godio: “Open ended-coaxial Cable Measurements of Saturated Sandy Soils”, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 3, No. 3, 2007, , XP002583544, pp. 175-182. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Carlson et al., “Development of the IIT Research Institute RF Heating Process for In Situ Oil Shale/Tar Sand Fuel Extraction—An Overview”, Apr. 1981, pp. 1-9. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025763, dated Jun. 4, 2010, pp. 1-15. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025807, dated Jun. 17, 2010, pp. 1-15. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025804, dated Jun. 30, 2010, pp. 1-15. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025769, dated Jun. 10, 2010, pp. 1-15. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025765, dated Jun. 30, 2010, pp. 1-11. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/025772, dated Aug. 9, 2010, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Butler, R.M. “Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil During In-Situ Steam Heating”, Can J. Chern Eng, vol. 59,1981, pp. 1-6. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Butler, R. and Mokrys, 1., “A New Process (VAPEX) for Recovering Heavy Oils Using Hot Water and Hydrocarbon Vapour”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 30(1 ), 1991, pp. 97-106. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Butler, R. and Mokrys, 1., “Recovery of Heavy Oils Using Vapourized Hydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of the VAPEX Process”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 32(6), 1993, pp. 56-62. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Butler, R. and Mokrys, 1., “Closed Loop Extraction Method for the Recovery of Heavy Oils and Bitumens Underlain by Aquifers: the VAPEX Process”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 37(4), 1998, pp. 41-50. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Das, S.K. and Butler, R.M., “Extraction of Heavy Oil and Bitumen Using Solvents at Reservoir Pressure” CIM 95-118, presented at the CIM 1995 Annual Technical Conference in Calgary, Jun. 1995, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Das, S.K. and Butler, R.M., “Diffusion Coefficients of Propane and Butane in Peace River Bitumen” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 74,988-989, Dec. 1996 pp. 1-8. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Das, S.K. and Butler, R.M., “Mechanism of the Vapour Extraction Process for Heavy Oil and Bitumen”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 21, 1998, pp. 43-59. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Dunn, S.G., Nenniger, E. and Rajan, R., “A Study of Bitumen Recovery by Gravity Drainage Using Low Temperature Soluble Gas Injection”, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 67, Dec. 1989, pp. 978-991. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Frauenfeld, T., Lillico, D., Jossy, C., Vilcsak, G., Rabeeh, S. and Singh, S., “Evaluation of Partially Miscible Processes for Alberta Heavy Oil Reservoirs”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 37(4), 1998, pp. 17-24. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Mokrys, 1., and Butler, R., “In Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oils and Bitumen by Propane Deasphalting: The VAPEX 11 Process”, SPE 25452, presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium held in Oklahoma City OK USA, D Mar. 21-23, 1993, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Nenniger, J.E. and Dunn, S.G., “How Fast is Solvent Based Gravity Drainage?”, CIPC 2008-139, presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, held in Calgary, Alberta Canada, Jun. 17-19, 2008, pp. 1-14. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Nenniger, J.E. and Gunnewick, L., “Dew Point vs. Bubble Point: A Misunderstood Constraint on Gravity Drainage Processes”, CIPC 2009-065, presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, held in Calgary, Alberta D Canada, Jun. 16-18, 2009, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Bridges, J.E., Sresty, G.C., Spencer, H.L. and Wattenbarger, R.A., “Electromagnetic Stimulation of Heavy Oil Wells”, 14, Third International Conference on Heavy Oil Crude and Tar Sands, UNITAR/UNDP, Long Beach D California, USA Jul. 22-31, 1985, pp. 1221-1232. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Carrizales, M.A., Lake, L.W. and Johns, R.T., “Production Improvement of Heavy Oil Recovery by Using Electromagnetic Heating”, SPE115723, presented at the 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, USA, Sep. 21-24, 2008, p. 1. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Carrizales, M. and Lake, L.W., “Two-Dimensional COMSOL Simulation of Heavy-Oil Recovery by Electromagnetic Heating”, Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference Boston, 2009, pp. 1-7. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Chakma, A. and Jha, K.N., “Heavy-Oil Recovery from Thin Pay Zones by Electromagnetic Heating”, SPE24817, presented at the 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers held in Washington, DC, Oct. 4-7, 1992, pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Chhetri, A.B. and Islam, M.R., “A Critical Review of Electromagnetic Heating for Enhanced Oil Recovery”, Petroleum Science and Technology, 26(14), 2008, pp. 1619-1631. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Chute, F.S., Vermeulen, F.E., Cervenan, M.R. and McVea, F.J., “Electrical Properties of Athabasca Oil Sands”, Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 16, 1979, pp. 2009-2021. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Davidson, R.J., “Electromagnetic Stimulation of Lloydminster Heavy Oil Reservoirs”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 34(4), 1995, pp. 15-24. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Hu, Y., Jha, K.N. and Chakma, A., “Heavy-Oil Recovery from Thin Pay Zones by Electromagnetic Heating”, Energy Sources, 21(1-2), 1999, pp. 63-73. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Kasevich, R.S., Price, S.L., Faust, D.L. and Fontaine, M.F., “Pilot Testing of a Radio Frequency Heating System for Enhanced Oil Recovery from Diatomaceous Earth”, SPE28619, presented at the SPE 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans LA, USA, Sep. 25-28, 1994, pp. 1-15. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Koolman, M., Huber, N., Diehl, D. and Wacker, B., “Electromagnetic Heating Method to Improve Steam Assisted /N.B./23 Gravity Drainage”, SPE117481, presented at the 2008 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 20-23, 2008, pp. 1-13. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Kovaleva, L.A., Nasyrov, N.M. and Khaidar, A.M., Mathematical Modelling of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Heating of the Bottom-Hole Area of Horizontal Oil Wells, Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermo Physics, 77(6), 2004, pp. 1184-1191. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
McGee, B.C.W. and Donaldson, RD., “Heat Transfer Fundamentals for Electro-thermal Heating of Oil Reservoirs”, CIPC 2009-024, presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 16-18, 2009, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Ovalles, C., Fonseca, A., Lara, A., Alvarado, V., Urrecheaga, K., Ranson, A. and Mendoza, H., “Opportunities of Downhole Dielectric Heating in Venezuela: Three Case Studies Involving Medium, Heavy and Extra-Heavy Crude Oil D Reservoirs” SPE78980, presented at the 2002 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium and International Horizontal Well Technology Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Nov. 4-7, 2002, pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Rice, S.A., Kok, A.L. and Neate, C.J., “A Test of the Electric Heating Process as a Means of Stimulating the 27 Productivity of an Oil Well in the Schoonebeek Field”, CIM 92-04 presented at the CIM 1992 Annual Technical Conference in Calgary, Jun. 7-10, 1992, pp. 1-16. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sahni, A. and Kumar, M. “Electromagnetic Heating Methods for Heavy Oil Reservoirs”, SPE62550, presented at the 2000 SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting held in Long Beach, California, Jun. 19-23, 2000, pp. 1-10. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sayakhov, F.L., Kovaleva, L.A. and Nasyrov, N.M., “Special Features of Heat and Mass Exchange in the Face Zone of /N.B./ 29 Boreholes upon Injection of a Solvent with a Simultaneous Electromagnetic Effect”, Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 71(1), 1998, pp. 161-165. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Spencer, H.L., Bennett, K.A. and Bridges, J.E. “Application of the IITRI/Uentech Electromagnetic Stimulation Process N.B.i 30 to Canadian Heavy Oil Reservoirs” Paper 42, Fourth International Conference on Heavy Oil Crude and Tar Sands, UNITARIUNDP, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Aug. 7-12, 1988, pp. 1-8. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Sresty, G.C., Dev, H., Snow, R.H. and Bridges, J.E., “Recovery of Bitumen from Tar Sand Deposits with the Radio Frequency Process”, SPE Reservoir Engineering, Jan. 1986, pp. 85-94. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Vermulen, F. and McGee, B.C.W., “In Situ Electromagnetic Heating for Hydrocarbon Recovery and Environmental Remediation”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Distinguished Author Series, 39(8), 2000, pp. 25-29. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Schelkunoff, S.K. and Friis, H.T., “Antennas: Theory and Practice”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London, Chapman Hall, Limited, 1952, pp. 229-244, 351-353. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Gupta, S.C., Gittins, S.D., “Effect of Solvent Sequencing and Other Enhancement on Solvent Aided Process”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 46, No. 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 57-61. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Folke Engelmark, Time-Lapse Monitoring of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGO) of Heavy Oil Using Multi-Transient Electro-Magnetics (MTEM), CSPG CSEG Convention, 2007, pp. 647-651. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,182, filed May 6, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180020508 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14705182 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15715247 | US | |
Parent | 12395995 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 14705182 | US |