This invention relates generally to the wireless communications field, and more specifically to new and useful full-duplex relays.
In many wireless communication networks, there are areas that are not easily covered by access points due to signal attenuation by terrain or other structural obstacles. One approach to extending access point signal coverage involves using relay nodes that rebroadcast signals originating from and/or destined to access points.
One major roadblock to successful implementation of relays is the problem of self-interference; relays may suffer from issues resulting from cross-talk between transmitters and receivers, duplexer leakages, or other undesired electromagnetic couplings. Many modern relays use frequency or time division multiplexing techniques or antenna separation techniques to address self-interference. Each of these techniques has substantial drawbacks: frequency division multiplexing requires doubling spectrum usage, time division multiplexing requires halving signal capacity, and antenna separation is often expensive, if not impossible given space constraints. Full-duplex relays may address self-interference without any of these drawbacks. Thus, there is a need in the wireless communications field to create new and useful full-duplex relays. This invention provides such new and useful full-duplex relays.
The following description of the preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
As shown in
The relay 100 is preferably used to repeat communication signals traveling bi-directionally between two wireless communication systems (e.g. a cell-phone tower and a cell phone, or a Wi-Fi™ access point and a computer, two wireless radios), but may additionally or alternatively be used to repeat communications signals between any other suitable wired or wireless communication systems. In a variation of a preferred embodiment, the relay 100 is a one-way relay and includes only a first receiver 110, a first transmitter 120, and a self-interference canceller 130.
The relay 100 is preferably implemented using both digital and analog circuitry. Digital circuitry is preferably implemented using a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) and/or any suitable processor(s) or circuit(s). Analog circuitry is preferably implemented using analog integrated circuits (ICs) but may additionally or alternatively be implemented using discrete components (e.g., capacitors, resistors, transistors), wires, transmission lines, waveguides, digital components, mixed-signal components, or any other suitable components. The relay 100 preferably includes memory to store configuration data, but may additionally or alternatively be configured using externally stored configuration data or in any suitable manner.
In one example implementation, the relay 100 is used as a cellular repeater. The relay 100 is connected to a cell tower by a first communications link using a first transmit/receive antenna coupled to the relay 100 by a duplexer, and to a cell phone by a second communications link using a second transmit/receive antenna coupled to the relay 100 by a duplexer. The cell phone and cell tower natively communicate at an uplink frequency (from phone to tower) and a downlink frequency (from tower to phone). The relay 100 receives and re-transmits communication on both the uplink frequency (phone to relay to tower) and the downlink frequency (tower to relay to phone). The self-interference canceller 130 enables full-duplex operation for the first transmit/receive antenna and the second transmit receive/antenna. This is distinct from traditional relays, which must rely on techniques like time-division multiplexing or antenna isolation to avoid self-interference. More specifically, the self-interference canceller 130 may enable the relay 100 to receive downlink communications (from tower to relay), retransmit downlink communications (from relay to phone), receive uplink communications (from phone to relay), and retransmit uplink communications (from relay to tower) simultaneously, without requiring antennas to be isolated from one another, the use of additional frequencies, or the use of time multiplexing. Thus, the relay 100 is able to provide network-relaying capability without excess cost, excess spectrum usage, or significantly decreased data capacity.
The first receiver 110 functions to receive analog receive signals transmitted by a first communications system over a first communications link (e.g., a wireless channel, a coaxial cable). The first receiver no preferably converts analog receive signals into digital receive signals for processing before re-transmission by the first transmitter 120, but may additionally or alternatively not convert analog receive signals (passing them through directly without conversion).
The first receiver no is preferably a radio-frequency (RF) receiver, but may additionally or alternatively be any suitable receiver.
The first receiver 110 is preferably coupled to the first communications link by a duplexer-coupled RF antenna as shown in
The first receiver no preferably includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) in and a frequency downconverter 112, as shown in
The ADC 111 may be any suitable analog-to-digital converter; e.g., a direct-conversion ADC, a flash ADC, a successive-approximation ADC, a ramp-compare ADC, a Wilkinson ADC, an integrating ADC, a delta-encoded ADC, a time-interleaved ADC, or any other suitable type of ADC.
The frequency downconverter 112 functions to downconvert the carrier frequency of the analog receive signal to baseband, preparing it for conversion to a digital receive signal. The downconverter 112 preferably accomplishes signal downconversion using heterodyning methods, but may additionally or alternatively use any suitable upconversion methods.
The downconverter 112 preferably includes a local oscillator (LO), a mixer, and a baseband filter. The local oscillator functions to provide a frequency shift signal to the mixer; the mixer combines the frequency shift signal and the analog receive signal to create (usually two) frequency shifted signals, one of which is the baseband signal, and the baseband filter rejects signals other than the baseband analog receive signal.
The local oscillator is preferably a digital crystal variable-frequency oscillator (VFO) but may additionally or alternatively be an analog VFO or any other suitable type of oscillator. The local oscillator preferably has a tunable oscillation frequency but may additionally or alternatively have a static oscillation frequency.
The mixer is preferably an active mixer, but may additionally or alternatively be a passive mixer. The mixer may comprise discrete components, analog ICs, digital ICs, and/or any other suitable components. The mixer preferably functions to combine two or more electrical input signals into one or more composite outputs, where each output includes some characteristics of at least two input signals.
The baseband filter is preferably a lowpass filter with a tunable low-pass frequency. Additionally or alternatively, the baseband filter may be a lowpass filter with a set low-pass frequency, or any other suitable type of filter. The baseband filter is preferably a passive filter, but may additionally or alternatively be an active filter. The baseband filter is preferably implemented with analog circuit components, but may additionally or alternatively be digitally implemented.
The second receiver 115 functions to receive analog receive signals transmitted by a second communications system over a second communications link (e.g., a wireless channel, a coaxial cable). The second receiver 115 preferably converts analog receive signals into digital receive signals for processing before re-transmission by the second transmitter 125, but may additionally or alternatively not convert analog receive signals (passing them through directly without conversion).
The second receiver 115 preferably includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 116 and a frequency downconverter 117, as shown in
The first transmitter 120 functions to retransmit signals received by the first receiver no. The first transmitter 120 preferably converts digital transmit signals into analog transmit signals, but may additionally or alternatively receive and retransmit analog transmit signals from the first receiver 110, thus avoiding digital-to-analog conversion. The transmit signals are preferably formed by processing receive signals (which may include analog-to-digital conversion or frequency shifting, for example) by the first receiver no, but the transmit signals may additionally or alternatively be any signal intended for transmission by the relay 100. The first transmitter 120 preferably transmits signals over a second communications link to a second communications system; these signals are preferably retransmitted signals from a first communication system sent to the relay 100 over a first communications link, but may additionally or alternatively be any suitable signals.
The first transmitter 120 is preferably a radio-frequency (RF) transmitter, but may additionally or alternatively be any suitable transmitter.
The first transmitter 120 is preferably coupled to the second communications link by a duplexer-coupled RF antenna as shown in
The first transmitter 120 preferably includes a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 121 and a frequency upconverter 122, as shown in
The DAC 121 may be any suitable digital-to-analog converter; e.g., a pulse-width modulator, an oversampling DAC, a binary-weighted DAC, an R-2R ladder DAC, a cyclic DAC, a thermometer-coded DAC, or a hybrid DAC.
The frequency upconverter 122 functions to upconvert the carrier frequency of the baseband analog transmit signal to a radio frequency, preparing it for transmission over the communications link. The upconverter 122 preferably accomplishes signal upconversion using heterodyning methods, but may additionally or alternatively use any suitable upconversion methods.
The upconverter 122 preferably includes a local oscillator (LO), a mixer, and an RF filter. The local oscillator functions to provide a frequency shift signal to the mixer; the mixer combines the frequency shift signal and the baseband analog transmit signal to create (usually two) frequency shifted signals, one of which is the RF analog transmit signal, and the RF filter rejects signals other than the RF analog transmit signal.
The local oscillator is preferably a digital crystal variable-frequency oscillator (VFO) but may additionally or alternatively be an analog VFO or any other suitable type of oscillator. The local oscillator preferably has a tunable oscillation frequency but may additionally or alternatively have a static oscillation frequency.
The mixer is preferably an active mixer, but may additionally or alternatively be a passive mixer. The mixer may comprise discrete components, analog ICs, digital ICs, and/or any other suitable components. The mixer preferably functions to combine two or more electrical input signals into one or more composite outputs, where each output includes some characteristics of at least two input signals.
The RF filter is preferably a bandpass filter centered around a tunable radio frequency. Additionally or alternatively, the RF filter may be a bandpass filter centered around a set radio frequency, or any other suitable type of filter. The RF filter is preferably a passive filter, but may additionally or alternatively be an active filter. The RF filter is preferably implemented with analog circuit components, but may additionally or alternatively be digitally implemented.
The second transmitter 125 functions to retransmit signals received by the second receiver 115. The second transmitter 125 preferably converts digital transmit signals into analog transmit signals, but may additionally or alternatively receive and retransmit analog signals from the second receiver 115, thus avoiding digital-to-analog conversion. The transmit signals are preferably formed by processing receive signals (which may include analog-to-digital conversion or frequency shifting, for example) by the second receiver 115, but the transmit signals may additionally or alternatively be any signal intended for transmission by the relay 100. The second transmitter 125 preferably transmits signals over a first communications link to a first communications system; these signals are preferably retransmitted signals from a second communication system sent to the relay 100 over a second communications link, but may additionally or alternatively be any suitable signals.
The second transmitter 125 preferably includes a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 126 and a frequency upconverter 127, as shown in
The self-interference canceller 130 functions to reduce self-interference in the relay 100 by canceling self-interference components present in receive signals of the relay 100. The self-interference canceller 130 preferably includes one or more analog self-interference cancellers 131; the self-interference canceller 130 may additionally or alternatively include a digital self-interference canceller 132, as shown in
Analog self-interference cancellers 131 preferably reduce self-interference by sampling an analog transmit signal and generating an analog self-interference cancellation signal based on the input analog transmit signal. The analog self-interference cancellation signal is preferably combined with an analog receive signal before the analog receive signal is received by a receiver (e.g., 110 or 115), but may additionally or alternatively be combined with the receive signal at any suitable location or time.
Analog self-interference cancellers 131 preferably generate self-interference cancellation signals for a given analog receive signal from a corresponding direction analog transmit signal as shown in
For example, in situations where the relay 100 relays bi-directional communication (e.g., uplink/downlink) on well-separated frequencies, self-interference in the downlink receiver occurring from the uplink transmitter may be negligible (or vice versa); however, in situations where the uplink and downlink frequencies are closer, self-interference may occur across channels. In these situations it might be desirable to have hetero-channel as well as homo-channel self-interference cancellation, as shown in
The analog self-interference canceller 131 is preferably implemented as an analog circuit that transforms an analog transmit signal into an analog self-interference cancellation signal by combining a set of filtered, scaled, and/or delayed versions of the analog transmit signal, but may additionally or alternatively be implemented as any suitable circuit. For instance, the analog self-interference canceller 131 may perform a transformation involving only a single version or copy of the analog transmit signal. The transformed signal (i.e. the analog self-interference cancellation signal) preferably represents at least a part of the self-interference component received at a coupling point of the relay 100 to a communications link (e.g. a receive antenna).
The analog self-interference canceller 131 is preferably adaptable to changing self-interference parameters in addition to changes in the analog transmit signal; for example, transmitter temperature, ambient temperature, antenna configuration, humidity, and transmitter power. Adaptation of the analog self-interference canceller 131 is preferably performed by a control circuit or other control mechanism included in the canceller 131, but may additionally or alternatively be performed by any suitable controller.
The analog self-interference canceller 131 is preferably coupled to signal paths by short section directional transmission line couplers, but may additionally or alternatively be coupled by any power dividers, power combiners, directional couplers, or other types of signal splitters suitable for coupling signal paths of the relay 100 to the analog self-interference canceller 131.
The digital self-interference canceller 132 functions to reduce self-interference in the relay 100 by canceling self-interference components present in digital receive signals. The digital self-interference canceller 132 preferably performs both linear and non-linear digital self-interference cancellation, but alternatively may only perform one of the two.
The digital self-interference canceller 132 preferably reduces digital self-interference by sampling one or more digital transmit signals and generating one or more digital self-interference cancellation signals based on input sampled digital transmit signals (and a transform configuration). Digital self-interference cancellation signals may be combined with corresponding receive signals at any time or location. The digital self-interference canceller 132 preferably removes self-interference signal components not removed by analog self-interference cancellers 131.
The digital self-interference canceller 132 preferably samples digital transmit signals of the relay 100 (additionally or alternatively, the canceller 132 may sample analog transmit signals or any other suitable transmit signals) and transforms the digital transmit signals to digital self-interference cancellation signals based on one or more digital transform configurations. The digital transform configuration preferably includes settings that dictate how the digital self-interference canceller 132 transforms a digital transmit signal to a digital self-interference cancellation signal (e.g. coefficients of a generalized memory polynomial used to transform the transmit signal to a self-interference signal).
The digital self-interference canceller 132 preferably generates self-interference cancellation signals for a given digital receive signal from a corresponding direction digital transmit signal as shown in
For example, in situations where the relay 100 relays bi-directional communication (e.g., uplink/downlink) on well-separated frequencies, self-interference in the downlink receiver occurring from the uplink transmitter may be negligible (or vice versa); however, in situations where the uplink and downlink frequencies are closer, self-interference may occur across channels. In these situations it might be desirable to have hetero-channel as well as homo-channel self-interference cancellation, as shown in
Each self-interference cancellation signal generated by the digital self-interference canceller 132 is preferably associated with a configuration transform (e.g., t1, t2, t3, and t4 of
In the above description of the preferred embodiments, it is mentioned that the relay 100 may form transmit signals by processing receive signals (e.g., by phase shifting, amplifying, attenuating, frequency shifting, etc.). In a variation of a preferred embodiment, processing may be performed by relay bases 140 positioned between transmitters and receivers, as shown in
While the examples above are directed to single-in/single-out (SISO) relays, it is understood that the relay 100 may also be used for multiple-in/multiple-out (MIMO) communications, as shown in
The example relay 100 as shown in
As shown in
The first and second receivers 110 and 115 are preferably implementations having multiple inputs and outputs. In particular, each receiver preferably includes an ADC and frequency downconverter for each receive signal path; additionally or alternatively, receive signal paths may share ADCs and/or frequency downconverters. Additionally or alternatively, receivers may be any suitable MIMO receiver; for example, receivers may include MIMO signal splitting or processing circuitry (which may be used to process multiple MIMO analog signals into a single digital signal).
In an embodiment of the relay 100 designed for MIMO operating environments (i.e., multiple transmit and/or receive signals), the relay 100 preferably includes analog self-interference cancellers 131 for each pair of receive/transmit signals, as shown in
In an embodiment of the relay 100 designed for MIMO operating environments (i.e., multiple transmit and/or receive signals), the digital self-interference canceller 132 may perform digital self-interference cancellation on each MIMO digital receive signal, but may additionally or alternatively perform digital self-interference cancellation on a combined digital receive signal (resulting from the combination of MIMO digital receive signals). If the digital self-interference canceller 132 performs self-interference cancellation for multiple MIMO digital receive signals, cancellation may be performed for each TX/RX pairing, similarly to those described in the section on the analog self-interference canceller 131.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/871,519, filed on 29 Aug. 2013, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3922617 | Denniston et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4321624 | Gibson et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4952193 | Talwar | Aug 1990 | A |
5212827 | Meszko et al. | May 1993 | A |
5691978 | Kenworthy | Nov 1997 | A |
5734967 | Kotzin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5790658 | Yip et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818385 | Bartholomew | Oct 1998 | A |
5930301 | Chester et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6215812 | Young et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240150 | Darveau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6317583 | Wolcott et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6411250 | Oswald et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6539204 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567649 | Souissi | May 2003 | B2 |
6639551 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657950 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6725017 | Blount et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6915112 | Sutton et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6965657 | Rezvani et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7139543 | Shah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7336940 | Smithson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349505 | Blount et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362257 | Bruzzone et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397843 | Grant et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426242 | Thesling | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7509100 | Toncich | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7706755 | Muhammad et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7778611 | Asai et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7869527 | Vetter et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7987363 | Chauncey et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8005235 | Rebandt, II et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8027642 | Proctor et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8055235 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8060803 | Kim | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8081695 | Chrabieh et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086191 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8155595 | Sahin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175535 | Mu | May 2012 | B2 |
8179990 | Orlik et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8218697 | Guess et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8274342 | Tsutsumi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8331477 | Huang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8349933 | Bhandari et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351533 | Shrivastava et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8385871 | Wyville | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417750 | Yan et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8422540 | Negus et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8457549 | Weng et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8462697 | Park et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8502924 | Liou et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521090 | Kim et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8711943 | Rossato et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8755756 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8842584 | Jana et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8995410 | Balan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9019849 | Hui et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042838 | Braithwaite | May 2015 | B2 |
9054795 | Choi et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9077421 | Mehlman et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9124475 | Li et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9136883 | Moher et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9184902 | Khojastepour et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9231647 | Polydoros et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9312895 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9461698 | Moffatt et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20020034191 | Shattil | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020064245 | McCorkle | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154717 | Shima | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172265 | Kenney | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030031279 | Blount et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030099287 | Arambepola | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104787 | Blount et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030148748 | Shah | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040106381 | Tiller | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040266378 | Fukamachi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050078743 | Shohara | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129152 | Hillstrom | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159128 | Collins et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190870 | Blount et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050250466 | Varma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254555 | Teague | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050282500 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030277 | Cyr et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058022 | Webster et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060209754 | Ji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060273853 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018722 | Jaenecke | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070207747 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249314 | Sanders et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070274372 | Asai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037801 | Alves et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080107046 | Kangasmaa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111754 | Osterhues et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131133 | Blunt et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080192636 | Briscoe et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219377 | Nisbet | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090022089 | Rudrapatna | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034437 | Shin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047914 | Axness et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090180404 | Jung et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186582 | Muhammad et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090303908 | Deb et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325509 | Mattisson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014600 | Li et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014614 | Leach et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022201 | Vandenameele | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056166 | Tenny | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100103900 | Yeh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117693 | Lorg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136900 | Seki | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150033 | Zinser et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159858 | Dent et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100215124 | Zeong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226416 | Dent et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226448 | Dent | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232324 | Radunovic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279602 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295716 | Yamaki et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110013684 | Semenov et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026509 | Tanaka | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110081880 | Ahn | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110149714 | Rimini et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110216813 | Baldemair et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222631 | Jong | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243202 | Lakkis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250858 | Jain et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256857 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268232 | Park et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110311067 | Harris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319044 | Bornazyan | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021153 | Bhandari et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120063369 | Lin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063373 | Chincholi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120140685 | Lederer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147790 | Khojastepour et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154249 | Khojastepour et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155335 | Khojastepour et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155336 | Khojastepour et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120201153 | Bharadia et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201173 | Jain et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224497 | Lindoff et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130005284 | Dalipi | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044791 | Rimini et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056270 | Ward | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130089009 | Li | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102254 | Cyzs | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130155913 | Sarca | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166259 | Weber et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194984 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215805 | Hong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225101 | Basaran et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253917 | Schildbach | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259343 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301487 | Khandani | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301488 | Hong | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308717 | Maltsev et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140011461 | Bakalski et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140126437 | Patil et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140169236 | Choi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185533 | Haub | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206300 | Hahn et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219139 | Choi et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219449 | Shattil et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140313946 | Azadet | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140348018 | Bharadia et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140348032 | Hua et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140376416 | Choi | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150139122 | Rimini et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150156003 | Khandani | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150156004 | Khandani | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188646 | Bharadia et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215937 | Khandani | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150249444 | Shin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150303984 | Braithwaite | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160218769 | Chang et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102694562 | Sep 2012 | CN |
0755141 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1959625 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2237434 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2267946 | Dec 2010 | EP |
180597 | Jul 2007 | JP |
103719 | May 2010 | JP |
166529 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2256985 | Jul 2005 | RU |
095386 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013056270 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013173250 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013185106 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014093916 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bharadia et al., “Full Duplex Radios” SIGOMM, Aug. 12-16, 2013, Hong Kong, China, Copyright 2013 ACM 978-1-4503-2056-6/6/13/08, 12 pages. |
McMichael et al., “Optimal Tuning of Analog Self-Interference Cancellers for Full-Duple Wireless Communication”, Oct. 1-5, 2012, Fiftieth Annual Allerton Conference, Illinois, USA, pp. 246-251. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150063176 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61871519 | Aug 2013 | US |