Radio opaque, reduced-pressure manifolds, systems, and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8882730
  • Patent Number
    8,882,730
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 9, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 11, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method of manufacturing a manifold pad that is, at least in part, radiopaque includes providing a manifold member having a plurality of flow channels; providing a radioopacifier; and heating the manifold member and the radioopacifier in a heating vessel at an elevated temperature to form the manifold pad. The manifold pad may distribute reduced pressure at a tissue site and allow for detection using radiography. Systems, manifold pads, and other methods are also presented.
Description
BACKGROUND

The disclosure herein relates generally to medical treatment systems, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to radio opaque, reduced-pressure manifolds, systems, and methods.


Depending on the medical circumstances, reduced pressure may be used for, among other things, reduced-pressure therapy to encourage granulation at a tissue site or for draining fluids at a tissue site. As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, “or” does not require mutual exclusivity. Both reduced-pressure therapy and drainage with reduced pressure often involve manifolding, or distributing, reduced pressure to the tissue site.


SUMMARY

According to an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a system for treating a tissue site on a patient includes a manifold pad, which is radiopaque, for distributing reduced pressure and for placing adjacent to the tissue site. The system further includes a sealing member for covering the manifold pad and a portion of the patient's epidermis. The system also includes a reduced-pressure source fluidly coupled to the manifold for providing reduced pressure to the manifold pad. The manifold pad includes a manifold member having an external surface area and a plurality of flow channels, and a radioopacifier deposited on the manifold member in a quantity sufficient to be detected using radiography.


According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method of manufacturing a manifold pad that is substantially radiopaque includes the steps of providing a manifold member comprising a polymer foam and having an exterior surface, providing a radioopacifier, and heating the manifold member and the radioopacifier in a heating vessel to coat the exterior surface of the manifold member in a quantity sufficient to be detected using radiography.


According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a manifold pad for distributing reduced pressure at a tissue site includes a manifold member formed of a polymer foam and having a plurality of flow channels and a plurality of struts having a strut exterior surface. The manifold pad further includes a radioopacifier associated with the struts of the manifold member in a quantity sufficient to be detected using radiography, and the strut exterior surface of the plurality of struts is at least fifty percent (50%) covered by the radioopacifier.


Other features and advantages of the illustrative embodiments will become apparent with reference to the drawings and detailed description that follow.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram with a portion shown in cross section of an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment of a reduced-pressure treatment system employing a manifold pad that includes a manifold member and a radioopacifier;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of area 2 in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a cross sectional view of a strut from the manifold pad of FIGS. 1 and 2; and



FIG. 4 is an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment of a method of manufacturing a manifold pad that includes a manifold member and a radioopacifier.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description of the non-limiting, illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments are defined only by the appended claims.


Referring now to FIGS. 1-3, a reduced-pressure treatment system 100 for treating a tissue site 102, e.g., a wound 104, is presented. The wound 104 may include, without limitation, any irregularity with a tissue, such as an open wound, surgical incision, or diseased tissue. The reduced-pressure treatment system 100 is presented in the context of a tissue site 102 that includes the wound 104, which is through the epidermis 106, or generally skin, and the dermis 108 and reaching into a hypodermis, or subcutaneous tissue 110. The reduced-pressure treatment system 100 may be used to treat a tissue, such as a wound of any depth, as well as many different types of wounds including open wounds. The tissue site 102 may be the bodily tissue of any human, animal, or other organism, including bone tissue, adipose tissue, muscle tissue, dermal tissue, vascular tissue, connective tissue, cartilage, tendons, ligaments, or any other tissue.


The reduced-pressure treatment system 100 includes a manifold pad 111, a sealing member 116, and a reduced-pressure subsystem 118. The manifold pad 111 includes a manifold member 112 and a radioopacifier 114. The manifold pad 111 is operable to distribute reduced pressure and to allow for radiopacity. Radiopacity refers to the relative inability of electromagnetism, e.g., x-rays or other radiation, to pass through a particular material. The radioopacifier 114 is associated with the manifold member 112 to make the manifold pad 111 sufficiently radiopaque to be located using radiography. For example, the radioopacifier 114 may be deposited on the manifold member 112 and thereby coupled or otherwise associated. The radioopacifier 114 may be, for example, a radio-opaque, vaporizable substance deposited on the manifold member 112 by physical vapor deposition. The manifold pad 111 will be further described below.


The sealing member 116 provides a fluid seal over the tissue site 102. “Fluid seal,” or “seal,” means a seal adequate to maintain reduced pressure at a desired site given the particular reduced-pressure source or subsystem involved. The reduced-pressure treatment system 100 may include an attachment device 120 for forming a fluid seal between the sealing member 116 and the patient's epidermis 106. The manifold pad 111 is positionable between a tissue-facing (inward-facing) surface 132 of the sealing member 116 and the tissue site 102. A patient-facing surface 122 of the manifold pad 111 faces the wound 104.


The term “manifold” as used herein generally refers to a substance or structure that is provided to assist in applying reduced pressure to, delivering fluids to, or removing fluids from a tissue site, e.g., tissue site 102. The manifold member 112 typically includes a plurality of flow channels or pathways to distribute fluids provided to, and remove fluids from, around the manifold member 112. The plurality of flow channels or pathways may be interconnected. The manifold member 112 may be a biocompatible material that is capable of being placed in contact with a tissue site, e.g., tissue site 102, and distributing reduced pressure to the tissue site 102. Examples of manifold members may include, without limitation, devices that have structural elements arranged to form flow channels, such as, for example, cellular foam, open-cell foam, porous tissue collections, and foams that include, or cure to include, flow channels. Thus, for example, the manifold member 112 may be porous and may be made from foam, gauze, felted mat, or other material. The manifold member 112 may be formed directly from a porous material, e.g., a foam, or from a material that is made porous, e.g., a solid member in which apertures have been applied.


In one illustrative embodiment, the manifold member 112 is a porous foam that includes a plurality of interconnected struts 124 or filaments. The struts 124 may help form a plurality of interconnected cells or pores 126, which act as flow channels through the manifold member 112. As a non-limiting example, the porous foam may be a polyurethane, open-cell, reticulated foam, such as a GranuFoam® material manufactured by Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated of San Antonio, Tex., or Granufoam Silver® material manufactured by Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated of San Antonio, Tex. As another non-limiting example, a polyvinyl alcohol foam, such as White Foam, which also available from Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated of San Antonio, Tex., might be used in some situations. The manifold pad 111, which has the radioopacifier 114, distributes (or manifolds) reduced pressure.


The sealing member 116 includes a first surface 130 and the tissue-facing (inward-facing) surface 132. The sealing member 116 may be sized so that the sealing member 116 overlaps the wound 104 in such a manner that a portion of the sealing member 116 extends beyond the periphery of the wound 104 to form an extension 134. The sealing member 116 may be any material that provides a fluid seal. The sealing member 116 may, for example, be an impermeable or semi-permeable, elastomeric material. “Elastomeric” means having the properties of an elastomer. It generally refers to a polymeric material that has rubber-like properties. More specifically, most elastomers have ultimate elongations greater than 100% and a significant amount of resilience. The resilience of a material refers to the material's ability to recover from an elastic deformation. Examples of elastomers may include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, polyisoprene, styrene butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, polybutadiene, nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene monomer, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, polysulfide rubber, polyurethane, EVA film, co-polyester, and silicones. Additional, specific examples of sealing member materials include a silicone drape, 3M Tegaderm® drape, acrylic drape such as one available from Avery Dennison.


The attachment device 120 may be used to hold the sealing member 116 against the patient's epidermis 106 or another layer, such as a gasket or additional sealing member. The attachment device 120 may take numerous forms. For example, the attachment device 120 may be a medically-acceptable, pressure-sensitive adhesive that is applied to the extensions 134 of the sealing member 116. Alternatively, the pressure-sensitive adhesive may span the entire width of the sealing member 116. Alternative attachment devices may include, but are not limited to, heat-activated adhesives, sealing tapes, double-sided sealing tapes, pastes, hydrocolloids, hydrogels, hooks, or sutures.


The reduced-pressure subsystem 118 includes a reduced-pressure source 136, which can take many different forms. The reduced-pressure source 136 provides reduced pressure and may be any device for supplying a reduced pressure, such as a vacuum pump, wall suction, or other source. While the amount and nature of reduced pressure applied to a tissue site 102 will typically vary according to the application, the reduced pressure will typically be between −5 mm Hg and −500 mm Hg and more typically between −100 mm Hg and −300 mm Hg. For example, without limitation, the pressure may be −90, −100, −110, −120, −130, −140, −150, −160, −170, −180, −190, or −200 mm Hg.


As used herein, “reduced pressure” generally refers to a pressure less than the ambient pressure at a tissue site that is being subjected to treatment. In most cases, this reduced pressure will be less than the atmospheric pressure at which the patient is located. Alternatively, the reduced pressure may be less than a hydrostatic pressure at the tissue site. The reduced pressure delivered may be constant, varied (patterned or random) and may be delivered continuously or intermittently. Although the terms “vacuum” and “negative pressure” may be used to describe the pressure applied to the tissue site, the actual pressure applied to the tissue site may be more than the pressure normally associated with a complete vacuum. Consistent with the use herein, an increase in reduced pressure or vacuum pressure typically refers to a relative reduction in absolute pressure. Unless otherwise indicated, values of pressure stated herein are gauge pressures.


A reduced-pressure conduit 138 fluidly couples the reduced pressure source 136 and a reduced-pressure interface 146. The reduced pressure developed by the reduced-pressure source 136 is delivered by the reduced-pressure conduit 138 to canister 142 and to a reduced-pressure interface 146. In one illustrative embodiment, the reduced-pressure interface 146 is a TRAC® technology port available from Kinetic Concepts, Inc. of San Antonio, Tex. The reduced-pressure interface 146 allows the reduced pressure to be realized within an interior portion below the sealing member 116 and realized within the manifold member 112. In this illustrative embodiment, the elbow port 148 extends through the sealing member 116 to the manifold member 112, but numerous arrangements are possible.


In operation, the manifold pad 111 may be placed proximate the tissue site 102, e.g., wound 104. The sealing member 116 may be placed over the manifold pad 111 such that the extension 134 extends beyond the periphery of the wound 102. The extension 134 may be secured to the patient's epidermis 106 by the attachment device 120 in order to form a fluid seal over a portion of the patient's epidermis 106 and the manifold pad 111. The reduced-pressure interface 146 may then be applied, if not already installed. The reduced-pressure conduit 138 is used to fluidly couple the reduced-pressure interface 146 and the reduced-pressure source 136.


The reduced-pressure subsystem 118 may be activated. Under a reduced pressure, fluids will be delivered from the tissue site 102 to the manifold pad 111 and through reduced-pressure conduit 138 to canister 142. After an adequate treatment period, the sealing member 116 may be removed and the manifold pad 111 removed.


The manifold pad 111 may be difficult to remove at times because of ingrowth of tissue and that at times the manifold pad 111 is cut by the healthcare provider to fit into small portions of a tissue site 102. At times, the manifold pad 111 is cut into quite complex shapes and fitted into crevices in deep wounds. In these types of situations, assurance may be desired that all portions of the manifold pad 111 have been removed from the tissue site 102. In these instances, the radioopacifier 114 allows the healthcare provider to confirm removal of all portions of the manifold pad 111 by using radiography. When radiography is used, if any portions of the manifold pad 111 remain, the radioopacifier 114 of the manifold pad 111 will appear at a dectable level on the radiograph or other results. If portions of the manifold pad 111 remain, they may be removed using surgical intervention, e.g., sharp debridement, or other techniques.


In order to locate any remaining portions of the manifold pad 111, the manifold member 112 must be substantially covered with the radioopacifier 114. In addition, the radioopacifier 114 must be sufficiently radio opaque. The manifold member 112 has an exterior surface area, or strut exterior area, that is a portion of the manifold member 112 that touches a fluid when submerged in a fluid. The exterior surface area may be at least 50% covered, at least 70% covered, at least 90% covered, a 100% covered, or any amount between 50 and 100%. The percentage average may be determined by approximating the surface area of the exterior of the struts and determining the exterior area of struts and determining the exterior area of the struts covered by the radiopacifier. As one illustrative, non-limiting example, the struts may be photographed and measured. The surface area of the exterior of the struts may be determined and the surface area of the struts covered with the radiopacifier determined. The percentage coverage may then be determined. In FIG. 3, an exterior surface area of the struts 124 of the manifold member 112 is substantially covered with a radioopacifier 114.


The manifold pad 111 has been presented initially in the context of the reduced-pressure treatment system 100. It should be understood, however, that the manifold pad 111 could be used in other situations with or without reduced pressure. The manifold pad 111 will now be described in more detail. Numerous approaches may be taken to prepare the manifold pad 111. The temperature and time are two variables that influence the amount of radioopacifier 114 that is deposited on the manifold member 112. In addition to other possible functions, the resultant manifold pad 111 may serve as an anti-microbial member. A number of non-limiting examples related to the manifold pad 111 will now be given.


EXAMPLE 1

With references to FIGS. 1 to 4, and primarily to FIG. 4, one non-limiting, theoretical example of a process 200 for manufacturing the manifold pad 111 is provided. Initially, as shown at 202, the manifold member 112 and radioopacifier 114 are provided.


The manifold member 112 may be any of the materials previously mentioned for a manifold member. Additional non-limiting examples include Granufoam® material or Granufoam® silver material, which are available from KCI. A radioopacifier material 114 in vaporizable or solution-based form is then applied to the manifold member 112. For example, a molecular iodine (I2) may be used as a radioopacifier, or radio-opaque, vaporizable substance.


The radioopacifier 114 (e.g., a radio-opaque, vaporizable substance) is applied using any suitable technique such as physical vapor deposition onto the manifold member 112, e.g., on to the struts 124. Thus, in the process 200, as shown at 204, the manifold member 112 and radioopacifier 114 are heated to allow for vapor deposition. The radioopacifier 114 may be applied in other ways as well. Regardless of the approach used, a portion of, or a substantial majority of the interconnected struts 124 are coated with the radioopacifier 114, e.g., >80% or >90% or >95%.


The temperature in the chamber where the manifold member 112 and radioopacifier 114 are placed is raised to an elevated temperature of about 70°-90° degrees Celsius and more typically between 80° and 90° degrees Celsius. The elevated temperature is maintained for a first time period, e.g., 3-6 hours and more typically 4-5 hours. The pressure is maintained substantially at atmospheric pressure, e.g., around 101.325 kPa at sea level.


After the first time period, as shown at 206, the manifold member 112, which now has the radioopacifier 114 associated with at least a portion of the manifold member 112, is removed and ventilated or cooled to approximately room temperature, e.g., generally in the range of 68° F. (20° C.) to 77° F. (25° C.). As suggested at 208, the manifold member 112 is then placed again in the chamber and heated to an elevated temperature typically in the range of 70° to 110° Celsius and more typically in this example to around 80° Celsius for a second time period to remove excess iodine, e.g., unbound iodine. The results of this example at this point should be around 27 to 31% (mass of the manifold pad) of iodine deposited as the radioopacifier 114 onto the manifold member 112.


The manifold member 112 may then be washed at step 210. For example, the manifold member 112 may be placed in a water wash for two or three hours. The mass loss may be monitored. The manifold member 112 with the radioopacifier 114 is then dried at step 212 and is ready to use as the manifold pad 111. The manifold pad 111 is operable to distribute reduced pressure, serve as an anti-microbial, and be radiopaque.


EXAMPLE 2

In a second, non-limiting example, samples of a Granufoam® material were used as the manifold member 112. The samples were placed in a chamber with solid iodine, which was used to form the radioopacifier 114 or radio-opaque, vaporizable substance. The samples and iodine remained in the chamber for two hours at various temperatures as shown in TABLE 1. Because of the use of solid iodine, the procedure was performed in a fume hood. When taken out, the manifold members 112, which now had iodine deposited, were left to ventilate at room temperature overnight. After ventilation the samples were heated to 100° C. for 15 minutes to remove unbound iodine, or excessive iodine. The effect of temperature on the binding of iodine to Granufoam® material is shown in the TABLE 1 below. Radiography was used to verify the radiopacity of the resultant samples.















TABLE 1








Percentage








(%) of
Manifold

Percentage




Manifold
weight
member
Manifold
(%) of



Initial
member
increase
weight after
Member
weight


Temp. for
manifold
weight after
after
ventilation at
weight after
increase


reaction
member
reaction with
reaction
20° C.
reheating at
after


with I2
weight, g
I2, g
with I2
overnight, g
100° C., g
ventilation





















22° C.
0.20081
0.20379
1.5
0.2023
0.20175
0.5


50° C.
0.19632
0.2063
5.1
0.20059
0.19954
1.6


100° C. 
0.17807
0.30473
71.1
0.24982
0.24135
35.5









EXAMPLE 3

In a third, non-limiting example, samples of foam with silver, e.g., Granufoam®-Silver, were used as the manifold member 112. The samples were placed in a chamber with solid iodine as the radioopacifier 114 or radio-opaque, vaporizable substance. The samples and radio-opaque, vaporizable substance remained in the chamber for two hours at various temperatures as shown in TABLE 2. In addition to deposition of iodine, a chemical reaction occurs involving the silver and iodine to make silveriodide (AgI) salt. The salt helps keep a larger portion of the radioopacifier in place even as the manifold member 112 is washed.


When taken out, the foam samples, which now have iodine associated with them, were left to ventilate at room temperature overnight. After ventilation, the samples were heated to 100° C. for 15 minutes to remove unbound iodine, or excess iodine. The effect of temperature on the binding iodine and Granufoam® Silver material is shown in the TABLE 2. Radiography was used to verify the radiopacity of the resultant samples.















TABLE 2











Percentage





Percentage
Foam weight
Foam
(%) of


Temperature
Initial

(%) of weight
after
weight
weight


of
Granufoam-
Foam weight
increase after
ventilation at
after
increase


reaction
Silver
after reaction
reaction with
20 C.
Reheating
after all


with I2
weight, g
with I2, g
I2
overnight, g
at 100 C., g
ventilation





















22° C.
0.248
0.2515
1.4
0.25235
0.25181
1.5


50° C.
0.28815
0.29388
2.0
0.29359
0.29299
1.7


100° C. 
0.28105
0.37017
31.7
0.34136
0.33323
18.6









EXAMPLE 4

In a fourth, non-limiting example, samples of Granufoam® material prepared according to examples 2 and 3 above, i.e., the reaction between Granufoam® and Granufoam® Silver with iodine as the radioopacifier 114 at 100° C., were provided. The samples were placed in deionized water for three hours. The samples were removed from the water and placed in centrifuge conical tubes with separators and centrifuged for 30 minutes at 3000 r.p.m. Then, the samples were dried at 60° C. until the mass monitoring showed that a constant weight had been realized. Naive (non-treated with iodine) manifold members, e.g., samples of Granufoam® and Granufoam®-Silver, were taken as controls. Original weights of the foams as well as weights of foams after treatment with water and drying are shown in the TABLE 3.


As TABLE 3 presents, the samples of Granufoam® material treated with iodine at 100° C. lost about 18% of their mass after treatment with water. The samples of Granufoam® Silver lost only about 3.5% of their weight. The weights of naive Granufoam® and Granufoam®-Silver materials are not affected by treatment with water. Radiography was used to verify the radiopacity of the resultant samples.












TABLE 3







Dry foam





weight after



Initial foam
treatment
% of weight


Sample
weight, g
with water, g
change


















Granufoam ®
0.02344
0.02361
0.7


Granufoam ®-Iodine
0.01987
0.01677
−(18.5)


Granufoam ®-Silver
0.03029
0.03043
0.5


Granufoam ®-Silver-Iodine
0.03046
0.02941
−(3.6)









The Granufoam® iodine foam initially gains weight largely because the foam physically absorbs iodine, but then part of the iodine is removed by water and so is lighter after a water rinse. In the case of Granufoam®-Silver-Iodine, in addition to physical adsorption of iodine, a chemical reaction occurs that involves the silver and iodine to make silver iodide (AGI) salt. The salt is insoluble and is not removed during washing, but other portions, e.g., absorbed portions, may be removed at least in part.


EXAMPLE 5

The amount of radioopacifier 114, e.g., iodine, absorbed by the manifold member 112, e.g., foam, may be tuned, or adjusted, by varying both reaction temperature and exposure time. A fifth, non-limiting example demonstrates this effect, at least in part. Samples of foam, Granufoam® and Granufoam® Silver foams were provided. The foam samples were inserted into a chamber with iodine as the radioopacifier. The pressure in the chamber was maintained at substantially atmospheric level. Then, the foam samples were withdrawn from the chamber and ventilated according to procedure described above in Example 2.


As shown in TABLE 4, generally increasing reaction temperature and exposure time leads to higher adsorption of iodine on the foam samples. Each of the samples are treated Granufoam® Silver samples. Radiography was used to verify the radiopacity of the resultant samples. In particular, foams were placed on the skin of a pig with an X-ray film located under the animal. Images were acquired with the following X-ray parameters: 74 kVp, 76-80 mAh.














TABLE 4









Foam weight
% of weight





Original
after iodine
change after




Reaction
foam
treatment
treatment


Sample
Temperature,
time,
weight,
and
and


#
° C.
hours
g
ventilation, g
ventilation







1
 80°
5
0.15408
0.18506
20.1


2
 80°
8
0.17783
0.24611
38.4


3
100°
5
0.17859
0.24709
38.4


4
100°
8
0.20792
0.34797
67.4









EXAMPLE 6

As noted earlier, the manifold pad 111 may serve to inhibit microbial growth. In a test, the antimicrobial properties of illustrative, non-limiting examples of manifold pads 111 were considered. In this example, samples of manifold pads 111 made using Granufoam® and Granufoam®-Silver foams as the manifold members 112 and iodine was used as the radioopacifier 114 were used. In the experiment, zones of inhibition of microbial growth were measured. Samples of the manifold pads 111, e.g., of the treated Granufoam® and Granufoam®-silver foams, were pre-cut into pieces of 5 mm thick and 8 mm in diameter and washed with ethyl alcohol. The weights of dried samples varied in the range of 0.009-0.01 g. The foam samples were placed in the chamber approximately three centimeters above a layer of solid iodine for two hours at 90° C. The masses of the foam samples after reaction with iodine were in the range of 0.022-0.023 g. Some of the samples were washed with sterile water for two hours and dried overnight. Weights of washed and dried samples were in the range of 0.012-0.013 g.


American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cultures of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® Number #33591) (a Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) species) and Escherichia coli (Migula) Castellani and Chalmers (ATCC® Number #10536) were re-hydrated and then streaked onto a growth plate and inoculated into a broth solution for 18 hours at 37° C. These organisms are available from the American Type Culture Collection of Manassas, Va. (www.atcc.org). The plates were incubated to reach 2−4×107 CFU/ml for each of the two strains. API identification strips were used to verify bacterial species before the test proceeded further.


The foam samples were transferred to a 100 mm plate using sterile tweezers. The foam samples were gently pressed with sterile forceps to ensure that each foam sample adhered to the agar surface. 125 μl of saline solution was administered on top of the foam samples to re-hydrate and flush the antimicrobial through the foam. The plates were allowed to remain at room temperature for approximately 30 minutes. Then the plates were incubated in an inverted position for 18 hours at 37° C. After incubation, clear zones around each disk were measured. The zones where no bacterial growth occurred (zones of inhibition) correspond to the minimum concentration of drug required to inhibit bacteria growth. 30 μg of Vancomycin and 10 μg of Gentamicin were taken as standards effective G (+) and G (−) microorganisms accordingly. Average zones of inhibition are presented in TABLE 5. The manifold pads (foam samples treated with iodine in this case) show a very high antimicrobial effect—surpassing those for antibiotic standards.












TABLE 5









MRSA

E. Coli













Average

Average




zone of
Standard
zone of
Standard


Sample
inhibition
deviation
inhibition
deviation














Naive
0
0
0
0


GranuFoam ®


Control


Naive
0
0
0
0


Granufoam ®-


Silver Control


Vancomycin 30 ug
17.7
0.6
11.0
1.0


Standard


Gentamicin 10 ug
19.3
0.6
26.7
0.6


Standard


Granufoam ®-
40.0
1.7
34.7
0.6


Silver-Iodine


unwashed


Granufoam ®-
41.0
0
38.0
2.6


Iodine unwashed


Granufoam ®-
34.0
1.0
28.3
0.6


Silver-Iodine


washed


Granufoam ®-
34.3
1.5
29.3
1.2


Iodine washed









While iodine is preferred, other radioopacifiers 114 may be used. For example, bromine, combination of iodine with bromine, and some other elements with high atomic numbers (barium salts) may provide radio opacity. While physical vapor deposition may be used and is presented in the examples, the radioopacifier may also be used in a solution-based form and applied with a wash. Some polymers with high content of iodine may be used. The polymer can be dissolved in organic solvents and applied to the Granufoam® material as a coating. Similarly, other radio dense, biocompatible materials, such as titanium, tantalum, strontium, either in metallic or associated salts, can be applied to manifold members using suitable processes to affect coating. In another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the manifold member may be a polyvinyl alcohol foam, such as White Foam, may be used, but the iodine or other radioopacifier would typically be applied during manufacture.


Although the present invention and its advantages have been disclosed in the context of certain illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, permutations, and alterations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. It will be appreciated that any feature that is described in connection to any one embodiment may also be applicable to any other embodiment.


It will be understood that the benefits and advantages described above may relate to one embodiment or may relate to several embodiments. It will further be understood that reference to ‘an’ item refers to one or more of those items.


The steps of the methods described herein may be carried out in any suitable order, or simultaneously where appropriate.


Where appropriate, aspects of any of the examples described above may be combined with aspects of any of the other examples described to form further examples having comparable or different properties and addressing the same or different problems.


It will be understood that the above description of preferred embodiments is given by way of example only and that various modifications may be made by those skilled in the art. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of the invention. Although various embodiments of the invention have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, or with reference to one or more individual embodiments, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for treating a tissue site on a patient with reduced pressure, the system comprising: a manifold pad for distributing reduced pressure and for placing adjacent to the tissue site;a sealing member for covering the manifold pad and a portion of the patient's epidermis;a reduced-pressure source fluidly coupled to the manifold for providing reduced pressure to the manifold pad; andwherein the manifold pad comprises: a manifold member comprising a plurality of flow channels formed by interconnected struts having a strut exterior area, anda radioopacifier deposited only on the interconnected struts in a quantity sufficient to be detected using radiography.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein at least 80 percent of the exterior surface of the manifold member is covered with the radioopacifier.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the radioopacifier is iodine.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the exterior surface area of the manifold member is at least 90 percent covered by the radioopacifier.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the radioopacifier is deposited on the manifold member by physical vapor deposition.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a reduced-pressure interface;a reduced-pressure delivery member fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure source and the reduced-pressure interface; andwherein the reduced-pressure interface is coupled to the sealing member for fluidly coupling the reduced-pressure delivery member and the manifold pad.
  • 7. A manifold pad for distributing reduced pressure at a tissue site, the manifold pad comprising: a polymer foam having a plurality of flow channels and a plurality of struts through the manifold pad;a radioopacifier coupled only to the plurality of struts through the manifold pad in a quantity sufficient to be detected using radiography; andwherein the plurality of struts through the manifold pad are at least fifty percent (50%) covered by the radioopacifier.
  • 8. The manifold pad of claim 7, wherein the plurality of struts through the manifold pad are at least ninety percent (90%) covered by the radioopacifier.
  • 9. The manifold pad of claim 7, wherein the radioopacifier comprises iodine that is at least 25% (mass) of the manifold pad.
  • 10. The manifold pad of claim 7, wherein the polymer foam comprises an open-cell, reticulated foam and the radioopacifier is silver iodide.
  • 11. The manifold pad of claim 7, wherein the radioopacifier is deposited on the plurality of struts through the manifold pad by physical vapor deposition.
RELATED APPLICATION

The present invention claims the benefit, under 35 USC §119(e), of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/313,386, entitled “Radio Opaque, Reduced-Pressure Manifolds, Systems, and Methods,” filed 12 Mar. 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (114)
Number Name Date Kind
1355846 Rannells Oct 1920 A
2547758 Keeling Apr 1951 A
2632443 Lesher Mar 1953 A
2682873 Evans et al. Jul 1954 A
2910763 Lauterbach Nov 1959 A
2969057 Simmons Jan 1961 A
3066672 Crosby, Jr. et al. Dec 1962 A
3367332 Groves Feb 1968 A
3520300 Flower, Jr. Jul 1970 A
3568675 Harvey Mar 1971 A
3648692 Wheeler Mar 1972 A
3682180 McFarlane Aug 1972 A
3826254 Mellor Jul 1974 A
4080970 Miller Mar 1978 A
4096853 Weigand Jun 1978 A
4139004 Gonzalez, Jr. Feb 1979 A
4165748 Johnson Aug 1979 A
4184510 Murry et al. Jan 1980 A
4233969 Lock et al. Nov 1980 A
4245630 Lloyd et al. Jan 1981 A
4256109 Nichols Mar 1981 A
4261363 Russo Apr 1981 A
4275721 Olson Jun 1981 A
4284079 Adair Aug 1981 A
4297995 Golub Nov 1981 A
4333468 Geist Jun 1982 A
4373519 Errede et al. Feb 1983 A
4382441 Svedman May 1983 A
4392853 Muto Jul 1983 A
4392858 George et al. Jul 1983 A
4419097 Rowland Dec 1983 A
4465485 Kashmer et al. Aug 1984 A
4475909 Eisenberg Oct 1984 A
4480638 Schmid Nov 1984 A
4525166 Leclerc Jun 1985 A
4525374 Vaillancourt Jun 1985 A
4540412 Van Overloop Sep 1985 A
4543100 Brodsky Sep 1985 A
4548202 Duncan Oct 1985 A
4551139 Plaas et al. Nov 1985 A
4553966 Korteweg Nov 1985 A
4569348 Hasslinger Feb 1986 A
4605399 Weston et al. Aug 1986 A
4608041 Nielson Aug 1986 A
4640688 Hauser Feb 1987 A
4655754 Richmond et al. Apr 1987 A
4664662 Webster May 1987 A
4710165 McNeil et al. Dec 1987 A
4733659 Edenbaum et al. Mar 1988 A
4743232 Kruger May 1988 A
4758220 Sundblom et al. Jul 1988 A
4787888 Fox Nov 1988 A
4826494 Richmond et al. May 1989 A
4838883 Matsuura Jun 1989 A
4840187 Brazier Jun 1989 A
4863449 Therriault et al. Sep 1989 A
4872450 Austad Oct 1989 A
4878901 Sachse Nov 1989 A
4897081 Poirier et al. Jan 1990 A
4906233 Moriuchi et al. Mar 1990 A
4906240 Reed et al. Mar 1990 A
4919654 Kalt et al. Apr 1990 A
4938901 Groitzsch et al. Jul 1990 A
4941882 Ward et al. Jul 1990 A
4953565 Tachibana et al. Sep 1990 A
4969880 Zamierowski Nov 1990 A
4985019 Michelson Jan 1991 A
5037397 Kalt et al. Aug 1991 A
5045080 Dyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5086170 Luheshi et al. Feb 1992 A
5092858 Benson et al. Mar 1992 A
5100396 Zamierowski Mar 1992 A
5134994 Say Aug 1992 A
5149331 Ferdman et al. Sep 1992 A
5167613 Karami et al. Dec 1992 A
5176663 Svedman et al. Jan 1993 A
5215522 Page et al. Jun 1993 A
5232453 Plass et al. Aug 1993 A
5261893 Zamierowski Nov 1993 A
5278100 Doan et al. Jan 1994 A
5279550 Habib et al. Jan 1994 A
5298015 Komatsuzaki et al. Mar 1994 A
5342376 Ruff Aug 1994 A
5344415 DeBusk et al. Sep 1994 A
5358494 Svedman Oct 1994 A
5437622 Carion Aug 1995 A
5437651 Todd et al. Aug 1995 A
5527293 Zamierowski Jun 1996 A
5549584 Gross Aug 1996 A
5556375 Ewall Sep 1996 A
5607388 Ewall Mar 1997 A
5636643 Argenta et al. Jun 1997 A
5645081 Argenta et al. Jul 1997 A
5664582 Szymaitis Sep 1997 A
5843116 Crocker et al. Dec 1998 A
6071267 Zamierowski Jun 2000 A
6135116 Vogel et al. Oct 2000 A
6241747 Ruff Jun 2001 B1
6287316 Agarwal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6345623 Heaton et al. Feb 2002 B1
6488643 Tumey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493568 Bell et al. Dec 2002 B1
6553998 Heaton et al. Apr 2003 B2
6649030 Tesar Nov 2003 B1
6814079 Heaton et al. Nov 2004 B2
20020077661 Saadat Jun 2002 A1
20020115951 Norstrem et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120185 Johnson Aug 2002 A1
20020143286 Tumey Oct 2002 A1
20040030304 Hunt et al. Feb 2004 A1
20070027414 Hoffman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070134163 Zhao Jun 2007 A1
20070218101 Johnson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20090306631 Santora et al. Dec 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
550575 Aug 1982 AU
745271 Apr 1999 AU
755496 Feb 2002 AU
2005436 Jun 1990 CA
26 40 413 Mar 1978 DE
43 06 478 Sep 1994 DE
295 04 378 Oct 1995 DE
0100148 Feb 1984 EP
0117632 Sep 1984 EP
0161865 Nov 1985 EP
0358302 Mar 1990 EP
1018967 Aug 2004 EP
692578 Jun 1953 GB
2 195 255 Apr 1988 GB
2 197 789 Jun 1988 GB
2 220 357 Jan 1990 GB
2 235 877 Mar 1991 GB
2 333 965 Aug 1999 GB
2 329 127 Aug 2000 GB
4129536 Apr 1992 JP
71559 Apr 2002 SG
WO 8002182 Oct 1980 WO
WO 8704626 Aug 1987 WO
WO 9010424 Sep 1990 WO
WO 9309727 May 1993 WO
WO 9420041 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9605873 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9718007 May 1997 WO
WO 9913793 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9963949 Dec 1999 WO
WO 2007067794 Jun 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (42)
Entry
Horák D; Cervinka M; P{dot over (u)}za V, “Radiopaque poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) particles containing silver iodide complexes tested on cell culture.” Biomaterials, 19 (1998) 1303-137.
N. A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External Vacuum Aspiration in the Treatment of Purulent Diseases of the Soft Tissues,” Current Problems in Modem Clinical Surgery: Interdepartmental Collection, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986);pp. 94-96 (copy and certified translation).
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PhD; “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Clinical Experience”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1997; pp. 563-576.
Susan Mendez-Eastmen, RN; “When Wounds Won't Heal” RN Jan. 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24.
James H. Blackburn, II, MD, et al; “Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457.
John Masters; “Reliable, Inexpensive and Simple Suction Dressings”; Letter to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1998, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/The British Association of Plastic Surgeons, UK.
S.E. Greer, et al “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of the Groin” British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), 53, pp. 484-487.
George V. Letsou, MD., et al; “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Stretch”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 31, 1990, pp. 634-639.
Orringer, Jay, et al; “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80.
International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB95/01983; Nov. 23, 1995.
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; Jan. 8, 1999.
PCT Written Opinion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; Jun. 8, 1999.
PCT International Examination and Search Report, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; Jan. 15, 1998 & Apr. 29, 1997.
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; Sep. 3, 1997.
Dattilo, Philip P., Jr., et al; “Medical Textiles: Application of an Absorbable Barbed Bi-directional Surgical Suture”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5.
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al; “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Management of Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986, pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof.
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation Mastitis”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1986, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof.
Yusupov. Yu. N., et al; “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnik Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof.
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof.
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds by Means of Vacuum Therapy”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof.
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al; “Effective Management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-63.
Egnell Minor, Instruction Book, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24.
Egnell Minor: Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns all Egnell Pumps, Feb. 3, 1983, pp. 2.
Svedman, P.: “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534.
Chinn, Steven D. et al.: “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 24, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81.
Arnljots, Björn et al.: “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of Intractable Leg Ulcers”, Scand J. Plast Reconstr. Surg., No. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213.
Svedman, P.: “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment of a Biosurface”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221.
Svedman, P. et al.: “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for Continuous or Intermittent Irrigation”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133.
K.F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M. Chariker, Managing Draining Wounds and Fistulae: “New and Established Methods,” Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Management Publications, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246.
G. {hacek over (Z)}ivadinović, V. ukić, {hacek over (Z)}. Maksimović, . Radak, and P. Pe{hacek over (s)}ka, “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Blood Vessels,” Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (copy and certified translation).
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain,” Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585.
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, Vacuum Therapy of Trophic Ulcers of the Lower Leg with Simultaneous Autoplasty of the Skin (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (copy and certified translation).
M. Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A.G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen,” British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370.
D.E. Tribble, An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction, Archives of Surgery 105 (1972) pp. 511-513.
M.J. Morykwas, L.C. Argenta, E.I. Shelton-Brown, and W. McGuirt, “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies and Basic Foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 38 (1997), pp. 553-562 (Morykwas I).
C.E. Tennants, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremities and Thorax, ”Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549.
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in Surgery, Medicine, and the Specialties: A Manual of Its Practical Application, (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211.
V.A. Solovev et al., Guidelines, The Method of Treatment of Immature External Fistulas in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, editor-in-chief Prov. V.I. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Solovev Guidelines”).
V.A. Kuznetsov & N. A. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption Treatment of Open Septic Wounds,” in II All-Union Conference on Wounds and Wound Infections: Presentation Abstracts, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenok et al. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”).
V.A. Solovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures after Gastric Resection (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Solovev Abstract”).
V.A.C. ® Therapy Clinical Guidelines: A Reference Source for Clinicians (Jul. 2007).
International Search Report and Written Opinion date mailed Jul. 12, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/027987.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110224632 A1 Sep 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61313386 Mar 2010 US