The present invention relates generally to radio repeaters in radio networks, an in particular to methods and arrangements for improved controllability of the operation of such repeaters.
Deployment of radio repeaters is a possible means to enhance the performance of radio network coverage. A radio repeater is typically provided with two antennas placed in different positions. An incoming signal is received on one of the antennas, amplified and transmitted (forwarded) on the other antenna. The repeater antennas are typically used differently in the uplink and downlink. The antenna used to receive the downlink signal is also used to transmit the amplified uplink signal and vice versa.
In TDD (Time Division Duplex) radio networks uplink and downlink transmission is time multiplexed on the same carrier frequency. Thus, a radio repeater in a TDD network should not amplify the uplink and downlink at the same time. Instead the radio repeater must somehow determine which direction (uplink or downlink) is currently active and operate accordingly. A scenario in which the time slot usage (uplink or downlink) changes over time and between cells is especially challenging.
US 2007/0015462 A1 describes a method addressing this conflict based on receiving and analyzing the TDD schedule transmitted to the mobiles also at the repeaters. By extracting the time periods used for downlink and uplink from this schedule, it is possible to separate amplification in the two directions in time. However, a drawback of this method is that the repeaters will amplify signals to and from all mobiles or users, regardless of whether this is actually necessary. Not only does this waste power for connections that do not require amplification, it also creates unnecessary interference.
Although radio repeaters in FDD (Frequency Division Duplex) can transmit simultaneously in both the uplink and downlink (since the two links occupy different frequency bands), they still have the same drawback as radio repeaters in a TDD system, namely that they will amplify signals to and from all mobiles or users, regardless of whether this is actually necessary.
In one or more of its embodiments, the present invention provides improved controllability of uplink and downlink amplification in radio repeaters, to reduce power consumption and generated interference.
Briefly, the base station determines radio links that require radio repeater amplification and forms radio repeater control messages including amplification requests for time slots associated with the determined radio links. These control messages are then transmitted. A repeater receiving these control messages can use them to control amplification in such a way that only radio links requiring amplification are amplified, thereby reducing both power consumption and generated interference.
The invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by making reference to the following description taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
This description will start by referring to radio repeaters in a typical TDD systems, where the downlink and uplink use the same frequency band, but not at the same time. Although the principles of the present invention described below may be used in other systems, a TDD system is well suited to illustrate the underlying problems and the suggested solution.
The method described in US 2007/0015462 A1 is based on only timing information. This, however, implies that all radio links handled by the base station will be amplified by the radio repeaters, regardless of the actual need for amplification. This does not only waste power, but to make matters worse, the wasted power will also create interference in the radio network.
An exemplary TDD radio frame structure is illustrated in
Although the invention has so far been described with reference to a TDD network, the same principles may also be used in an FDD (Frequency Division Duplex) network. It is true that in FDD networks the uplink and downlink use different frequency bands and that the radio repeaters may amplify simultaneously on both. However, it may still be desirable to turn amplifiers on and off. For example, the base station may know that the reception quality at a radio terminal is acceptable without amplification. In such a case it would be wasteful to amplify the signal. Furthermore, amplification also would increase the interference level in the network.
The description so far has focused on the case where a link between a base station and a mobile terminal occupies the entire transmission bandwidth. This is e.g. the case for time division or code division multiple access (TDMA and CDMA, respectively). The basic principles of the invention can, however, also be used in systems where the available bandwidth during a timeslot is shared by means of frequency division multiple access (FDMA). FDMA may, for example, easily be accomplished in an OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) network. With OFDM, the bandwidth comprises multiple sub-carriers and data symbols are transmitted in parallel over these sub-carriers. By assigning different sub-carriers to different links (users), the available bandwidth can be shared among several links. This is sometimes referred to as OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access).
In an FDMA system a time slot will include many sub-bands. However, the number of sub-bands allocated to a given radio link may occupy only a fraction of the available bandwidth, as illustrated in
Since a radio link in an FDMA multi-carrier system may use less than the entire available frequency band in a time slot, it is actually only the sub-band used by the link that should be amplified if amplification is required. This can be accomplished by filtering in the radio repeater, as illustrated in
In the FDMA multi-carrier systems described so far it has been assumed that the sub-carriers associated with a radio link occupy one or several consecutive sub-bands. However, this is not strictly necessary. For example, in so called distributed multiple access systems a radio link is formed by sub-carriers that are spread over the available spectrum. The principles described above are still applicable to such systems, although the filtering of idle sub-carriers may seem more challenging. However, this is not really a problem, since the requirements on the suppression of idle sub-carriers is rather modest, as noted above. Thus, in more general terms a radio link of an FDMA multi-carrier system is formed by a subset of the available sub-carriers.
The above description has described techniques to prevent repeaters from amplifying signals to and from all mobiles, regardless of whether this is actually necessary. However, another drawback of the prior art is that all repeaters in a cell will amplify signals to and from a mobile even if some repeaters are far away from the mobile and will not enhance the communication quality. This situation is illustrated in
The above problem may be solved by associating each radio repeater in a cell with a unique (within the cell) identification (ID). In this way individual amplification requests can be sent to each repeater. An example of a control message structure is illustrated in
When the communication system has full control over the positions and addresses of the repeaters within its coverage area, the selection of repeaters to be activated can be based on the position information. Any location-related information that is achievable for the user terminal can then be used for selecting a proper repeater or set of repeaters. If an accurate position is available, such a selection becomes quite straight-forward. In other cases, direction information may be available. Moreover, other location-related information, such as any characteristic radio signal disturbances may be used for selection purposes.
When the system knows nothing about the position of the repeaters, not even if they at all exist, a procedure similar to the following example may be used. Assume that an address space of 16 repeater addresses is available. The signal quality is found to be low for communication with a certain user terminal, i.e. the need for repeater assistance is present. The base station transmits orders for activating all available repeaters for a time period Δt. The signal conditions were found to be improved by such a measure. A conclusion can be made that at least one of the repeaters was situated at a suitable location for assisting the user terminal. When the time period Δt has elapsed, new control signals are transmitted, which order repeaters No. 1-8 to continue to operate. The improvement in quality remains, which indicates that repeaters 9-16 did not contribute to the improvement. After another time period Δt, new control signals are transmitted, which order repeaters No. 1-4 to continue to operate. Now, the improvement disappeared. After another time period Δt, new control signals are transmitted, which instead order repeaters No. 5-6 to operate. The improvement is still missing. After still another time period Δt, new control signals are transmitted, which instead order repeater No. 7 to operate. Now, the improvement is back. A conclusion can be made, that repeater No. 7 was the appropriate one for the present situation. Note, that the system still does not know the exact position of repeater No. 7. The information that repeater No. 7 is beneficially used is now associated with all available signal condition information and location-related information and preferably also other information such as time of the day, type of user terminal and even subscriber identity and provided to an association algorithm for improving an experience data-base. The next time a user terminal presents similar conditions, the system may conclude that repeater No. 7 is a good candidate to assist.
The functionality of the various blocks in the described embodiments is typically obtained by one or more micro processors or micro/signal processor combinations and corresponding software.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications and changes may be made to the present invention without departure from the scope thereof, which is defined by the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/063940 | 12/14/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/11/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/076993 | 6/25/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5623496 | Sagi | Apr 1997 | A |
5812933 | Niki | Sep 1998 | A |
5832365 | Chen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5987304 | Lätt | Nov 1999 | A |
6768897 | Suonvieri | Jul 2004 | B1 |
8032146 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20070015462 | Dean et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070184777 | Tanoue | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080075178 | Lappetelainen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100227620 | Nadan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0681374 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0806847 | Nov 1997 | EP |
55147042 | Nov 1980 | JP |
58040938 | Mar 1983 | JP |
60250736 | Dec 1985 | JP |
04109719 | Apr 1992 | JP |
07284156 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09298521 | Nov 1997 | JP |
11112399 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2000505263 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001518739 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2005184104 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005303613 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007129670 | May 2007 | JP |
2009502056 | Jan 2009 | JP |
8910660 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9917476 | Apr 1999 | WO |
2005122615 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007011869 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008004916 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009076994 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ohtsuka Patent Office. Summary of Japanese Office Action issued Feb. 20, 2012, pp. 1-3, Tokyo, Japan. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100265839 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |