1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to the wireless communications field and, in particular, to a short-range radio transceiver fabricated on an integrated circuit chip.
2. Description of Related Art
The high level of circuit integration possible with modern technology has allowed manufacturers of hand-held communications equipment (e.g., cellular phones) to substantially reduce the size of their products. As a general rule, these smaller products consume lass power and ultimately become cheaper to produce.
In the past, there have been a number of attempts to fabricate an entire radio transmitter/receiver (transceiver) on a single integrated circuit (IC) chip. Generally, these attempts have been unsuccessful, and only parts of such radios have teen placed on a single chip. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,428,835 to Okanobu discloses a receiver circuit formed on a single semiconductor chip. The primary reason for this lack of total integration can be found in the radio system specifications.
Most standard air interface specifications for radio communications systems set forth high requirements with respect to frequency accuracy, adjacent channel interference, modulation performance, etc. However, existing on-chip signal processing techniques have not yet reached a level that can meet the performance criteria net by these air interface specifications.
It is an object of the present invention to significantly reduce the overall size of a radio transceiver.
It is another object of the present invention to produce a short-range wireless radio link that is less costly than a cable link.
It is yet another object of the present invention to produce a short-range radio transceiver on a single integrated circuit chip.
In accordance with the present invention, the foregoing and other objects are achieved by a radio transceiver architecture that can be completely integrated into one semiconductor IC chip. In order to integrate the transceiver's IF filters into the chip, a heterodyne architecture with a relatively low IF is used. A single directly modulated VCO is used for both up-conversion during transmission, and down-conversion during reception. Bondwires are used as resonators in the oscillator tank for the VCO. A time-division duplex scheme is used in the air interface to eliminate cross-talk or leakage. A Gaussian-shaped binary FSK modulation scheme is used to provide a number of other implementation advantages.
A more complete understanding of the method and apparatus of the present invention may be had by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The preferred embodiment of the present invention and its advantages axe best understood by referring to
For the preferred embodiment, the air interface specification allows digital transmission of both voice and data. Such an air interface that can be used is described in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/685,069 to Dent, et al., filed Jul. 13, 1296, entitled “Short-Range Radio Communications System And Method Of Use.” The frequency band that can be used is the unlicensed Industrial, Scientific, Medical (ISM) band at 2.4 GHz, which has 83.5 MHz bandwidth available for use. However, in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires frequency spreading for operations where the transmitted power is higher than 0 dBm. There can be numerous “interferers” or “jammers” operating in this band (e.g., microwave ovens are notorious “interferers” in this band). Consequently, a frequency hopping scheme is used to provide increased immunity to such interference. Notably, in contrast to direct sequence frequency spreading, the interference immunity provided by frequency hop spreading is independent of the jammer's transmitted power.
In addition, with respect to the preferred embodiment, average frequency spreading over the entire 83.5 MHz band results without having to process wide bandwidth signals. Although the frequency spectrum that the embodied transceiver can be operated in is wide enough to provide the spreading, the instantaneous bandwidth can be small, which allows the transceiver's front end to be operated at a narrow band. In the preferred system, the instantaneous (channel) bandwidth is 1 MHz, whereas the hopping is carried out in a pseudo-random way over 79 hop channels (spanning 79 MHz). The preferred modulation scheme used is binary Gaussian-shaped frequency shift keying (GFSK). This approach provides a robust wireless communications link and allows the use of relatively simple transmitter and receiver circuitry.
For the preferred embodiment, the information signals are transmitted in packets. Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) error correction is employed to re-transmit packets received with errors in the data field. The voice field is not re-transmitted, but the (robust) Continuous Variable Slope Delta (CVSD) modulation scheme is used for speech coding. CVSD is a type of adaptive delta modulation scheme whereby performance degrades gracefully in the presence of noise. A time-division duplex (TDD) scheme is used to achieve a full-duplex communications link. A duplex frame lasts 1.25 ms, in which a packet is sent in one direction during the first 625 μs, and another packet is sent in the opposite direction during the second 625 μs. Each transmission occurs at a new hop frequency, which is determined by the user-dependent pseudo-random hop sequence.
In order to better understand the invention, it will be useful at this point to describe a radio transceiver in general terms.
Ones the received signal has been channel filtered, the next step in the process is to recover the information (18) from the channel and convert it into a usable format. For example, the information recovered can be in the form of discrete symbols (e.g., data out) such as those used in digital modulation schemes, or an analog signal for audio or video applications. Notably, the key function of the receiver section is to filter out the band of interest from the rest of the frequency spectrum.
The transmitter section of the transceiver (10) converts or shapes (20) the information to be transmitted into a signal format that can be conveyed by a carrier. That signal is then frequency upconverted (22) to the desired high frequency (RF) band and transmitted from the antenna (12). Notably, for the transmitter section, the key function is to confine the transmitted signal power to the band of interest (i.e., to leak as little signal power as possible to frequencies outside the band of interest).
One problem with integrating such a receiver on. a chip deals with integrating the IF bandpass filters (e.g., 38). For example, the performance of a filter is determined by its quality (Q) factor. Q is a measure of a filter's selectivity (how well it filters) and can be represented by the expression: Q=f0/BW, where (f0) is the filter's center frequency, and BW is the filter's bandwidth. Therefore, a narrow filter centered at a high frequency would have a high Q.
Generally, bandpass filters can be fabricated by a number of techniques and integrated on semiconductor chips. However, the Q values achievable for such filters are significantly limited using conventional electronic components in silicon technology. The primary limiting factors are the losses that occur between electronic components on the chip.
With respect to reducing interference and noise, only the bandwidth (BW) of the filter determines its performance in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. For a fixed bandwidth, low-Q filters can be integrated on a chip by lowering the center frequency, f0. For the extreme case, f0 becomes zero and the bandpass filter becomes a lowpass filter, which is much easier to integrate on chip than a bandpass filter. In this case, the signal being processed can be converted to baseband with only one down-conversion step. Of course, this approach is attractive from an integration standpoint and is indeed a way to obtain full integration. However, a second problem occurs with this approach, which is referred to as a “homodyne” or “zero-IF” architecture,
A so-called “DC offset” problem occurs with a zero-IF architecture, because the signal being processed is mapped directly to DC. Consequently, interference at DC is indistinguishable from the desired signal and cannot be filtered out. This problem also places more stringent requirements on the even order intermodulation characteristics of the receiver. Part of the DC offset can be removed with additional signal processing, but this approach increases circuit complexity and the power consumption of the IC.
An intermediate approach, which is suitable for integrating IF filters on a semiconductor chip, is to use a “low-IF” architecture. With this approach, the IF or filter's center frequency, f0, is a relatively low frequency, but not zero. This type of architecture allows fabrication of a low Q filter which is suitable for integration on a chip while avoiding DC problems.
Nevertheless, a third problem arises, which has to do with the image carrier. The process of mixing the received (RF) signal with a local, oscillator carrier, flo, produces a low IF signal, f0, which not only maps the frequency band of interest at flo+f0, but also maps the image band at flo−f0 to the IF signal (or vice versa). This process causes a significant problem, because after the two RF bands are mapped onto the same IF band, they are no longer distinguishable from each other. Therefore, an image-rejection device should be used.
The amount of image band suppression that can be realized with such image-rejection circuitry (e.g.,
Previously, when an attempt was made to place a transmitter and receiver on a single chip, one problem that occurred was that signals transmitted at relatively high power levels leaked into the receiver's input stage. In fact, such leakage or “cross-talk” has been a major design problem in previous attempts to fabricate an entire transceiver on a chip. However, for the preferred embodiment of the invention, a TDD schema is used for duplex operation over the air interface, which eliminates cross-talk and thereby facilitates full integration of the transceiver on a chip. In other words, the transmitter end receiver sections of the embodied transceiver are not active simultaneously, and the problem of cross-talk or leakage from the transmitter to receiver in a fully integrated transceiver is resolved.
Additionally, cross-talk or leakage can be reduced further by employing different transmit and receive frequencies using a frequency-division duplex (FDD) scheme. Normally, the use of an FDD scheme would require a duplexer at the transceiver's antenna stage in order to separate the transmitted and received signals. However, by also employing a TDD scheme in accordance with the invention, such a duplexer is not needed. Moreover, to further reduce the number of components on the chip, a single variable controlled oscillator (VCO) is used in the preferred embodiment, alternately for up-conversion in the transmit section and down-conversion in the receive section.
Still another advantage of FSK modulation, is that the received signal can be hard-limited after channel filtering. The information being received is contained only in the phase and not in the amplitude of the signal. Consequently, this approach eliminates the need for awkward automatic gain control (AGC) circuitry and amplitude tracking schemes. The AGC operation would also be severely hindered by the frequency hopping defined in the air interface due to the un-correlated signal fading on the different hop frequencies.
Returning to
In the transmitter section of
For this embodiment, the IF signal selected is about 3.0 MHz. The IF signal output from the combiner 216 is coupled to the IF receiver circuitry, which includes a bandpass filter 220 to suppress signals on adjacent channels. The bandpass filter is preferably a stagger-tuned IF filter using transconductance-C type filtering. The IF receiver circuitry also includes a hard limiter (H.L.) 222, an FM discriminator 224, and a lowpass filter 226. The IF receiver circuitry can also include an RSSI indicator with an A/D converter (not explicitly shown). The IF signal is detected (224), and the information recovered is output from the lowpass filter 226.
Transceiver 200 on a chip also includes a phase locked loop, which is composed of a phase detector 230, loop filter 236, and a prescaler with modulus logic 240. The phase locked loop is a component of a synthesizer including the phase detector 230, charge pump 232, regulator filter 234, loop filter 236, prescaler 240, modulus logic circuitry 238, VCO 218, and a buffer 219. As such, the input information signal (e.g., data in), shaped by the shaping filter 256, is used to directly modulate the VCO. A sample-and-hold (S/H) circuit (not explicitly shown) stabilizes the input voltage to the VCO, while the VCO is being directly modulated. The VCO 218 is also a component of the transmitter section. For transmissions, the output of the VCO 218 is coupled to a power amplifier 242 and to the antenna 202.
Fully differential signal paths are used to suppress common-mode noise and interference signals. In addition, all receive filters, transmit filters, and the FM discriminator apply matched electronic circuits. Autotuning of all the filters and the discriminator is provided by a reference filter which is locked to the crystal oscillator 248.
The transceiver 200 also includes digital circuitry 244 to provide power down control, programming of certain analog blocks on the chip due to process variations, and synthesizer control logic. The digital circuitry 244 is connected to a serial digital interface connection 246. A number of typical functional circuit blocks are also included on the chip, such as, for example, a crystal oscillator (XO) 248, frequency adjustable low power oscillator (LPO), power-on-reset (POR) 252, and finite state machine (FSM) 254. Consequently, the one chip transceiver shown in
In summary, as illustrated by the embodiments shown in
Although a preferred embodiment of the method and apparatus of the present invention has been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324396 | Schneider | Jun 1967 | A |
4426735 | Kasperkovitz | Jan 1984 | A |
4464770 | Maurer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4470071 | Rindal | Sep 1984 | A |
4476585 | Reed | Oct 1984 | A |
4523324 | Marshall | Jun 1985 | A |
4523328 | Kasperkovitz | Jun 1985 | A |
4551688 | Craiglow | Nov 1985 | A |
4569085 | Nolde et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4584715 | Baars et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4633315 | Kasperkovitz | Dec 1986 | A |
4653117 | Heck | Mar 1987 | A |
4656463 | Anders et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4718113 | Rother | Jan 1988 | A |
4776039 | Akaiwa | Oct 1988 | A |
4817198 | Rinderle | Mar 1989 | A |
4837853 | Heck | Jun 1989 | A |
4852123 | Bickley et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4888557 | Puckette, IV et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4893316 | Janc et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896374 | Waugh et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4926443 | Reich | May 1990 | A |
4944025 | Gehring et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4972455 | Phillips et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5003621 | Gailus | Mar 1991 | A |
5020092 | Phillips et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020147 | Okanobu | May 1991 | A |
5033110 | Harman | Jul 1991 | A |
5052027 | Poklemba et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5079526 | Heck | Jan 1992 | A |
5126682 | Weinberg | Jun 1992 | A |
5134404 | Peterson | Jul 1992 | A |
5140286 | Black et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5155862 | Hansen | Oct 1992 | A |
5162723 | Marzalek et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5194829 | Schoffel | Mar 1993 | A |
5212825 | Layton | May 1993 | A |
5222144 | Whikehart | Jun 1993 | A |
5241561 | Barnard | Aug 1993 | A |
5241702 | Dent | Aug 1993 | A |
5251218 | Stone et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263194 | Ragan | Nov 1993 | A |
5265267 | Martin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272534 | Vromans et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282228 | Scott | Jan 1994 | A |
5307517 | Rich | Apr 1994 | A |
5313173 | Lample | May 1994 | A |
5323332 | Smith et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324396 | Ferron et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335361 | Ghaem | Aug 1994 | A |
5339463 | Hansen | Aug 1994 | A |
5367539 | Copley | Nov 1994 | A |
5369470 | Hansen | Nov 1994 | A |
5390363 | Mirtich et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396520 | Degges | Mar 1995 | A |
5402087 | Gorczak | Mar 1995 | A |
5404589 | Bijker et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410733 | Niva et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410745 | Friesen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5428835 | Okanobu | Jun 1995 | A |
5428837 | Bayruns et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430770 | Abbey | Jul 1995 | A |
5438692 | Mohindra | Aug 1995 | A |
5440587 | Ishikawa et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5471665 | Pace et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481224 | Kimura | Jan 1996 | A |
5491457 | Feher | Feb 1996 | A |
5517530 | Gardner | May 1996 | A |
5521548 | Sugawara | May 1996 | A |
5528769 | Berenz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537435 | Carney et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548582 | Brajal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548831 | Bijker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550596 | Strolle | Aug 1996 | A |
5550865 | Cripps | Aug 1996 | A |
5561689 | Fleek et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584068 | Mohindra | Dec 1996 | A |
5598405 | Hirose | Jan 1997 | A |
5604927 | Moore | Feb 1997 | A |
5619491 | Panzer | Apr 1997 | A |
5619536 | Gourgue | Apr 1997 | A |
5640416 | Chalmers | Jun 1997 | A |
5640698 | Shen et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649288 | De Loe, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661487 | Targoff | Aug 1997 | A |
5673323 | Schotz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694417 | Andren et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710993 | Brekelmans | Jan 1998 | A |
5710998 | Opas | Jan 1998 | A |
5715281 | Bly et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715529 | Kianush et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724653 | Baker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734970 | Saito | Mar 1998 | A |
5734976 | Bartschi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740522 | Dolman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745843 | Wetters et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751188 | Guegnaud et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751249 | Baltus et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757531 | Tomesen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758265 | Okanobu | May 1998 | A |
5761613 | Saunders et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781847 | Clarke et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784414 | Bruekers et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796730 | Bellec | Aug 1998 | A |
5799042 | Xiao | Aug 1998 | A |
5802117 | Chosh | Sep 1998 | A |
5802463 | Zuckerman | Sep 1998 | A |
5808569 | Wuppermann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809015 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809096 | Martinez et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822378 | Van Veldhuizen | Oct 1998 | A |
5828705 | Kroeger et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828955 | Lipowski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832043 | Eory | Nov 1998 | A |
5838730 | Cripps | Nov 1998 | A |
5848107 | Philips | Dec 1998 | A |
5850598 | Behrent | Dec 1998 | A |
5854973 | Holtvoeth | Dec 1998 | A |
5867535 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875212 | Fleek et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890055 | Chu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896375 | Dent et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901349 | Guegnaud et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926513 | Suominen | Jul 1999 | A |
5937341 | Suominen | Aug 1999 | A |
5963273 | Boie | Oct 1999 | A |
5999802 | Aschwanden | Dec 1999 | A |
6006081 | Moore | Dec 1999 | A |
6028885 | Minarik et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035186 | Moore | Mar 2000 | A |
6226509 | Mole et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6374093 | Pesola | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374094 | Zappala | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427068 | Suominen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477148 | Gardenfors et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6560447 | Rahman et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6597748 | Hietala et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631256 | Suominen | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633550 | Gardenfors et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633979 | Smeets | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20020090924 | Suominen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094037 | Darabi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040038655 | Suominen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1304786 | Jul 1992 | CA |
1318358 | May 1993 | CA |
19502111 | Jan 1995 | DE |
0598277 | May 1994 | EP |
0671818 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0472119 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0512374 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0470484 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0470481 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 742 647 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 797 292 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0855804 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 058 396 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1058399 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1249076 | Feb 2004 | EP |
2052196 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2295513 | May 1996 | GB |
2296610 | Jul 1996 | GB |
03006107 | Jan 1991 | JP |
05268109 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06188781 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06204974 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06334553 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07-254865 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08251026 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08298475 | Nov 1996 | JP |
101996700580 | Nov 1994 | KR |
9410757 | May 1994 | WO |
9510889 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9515621 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9617441 | Jun 1996 | WO |
9628946 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9708842 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9808300 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9811672 | Mar 1998 | WO |
0235718 | May 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bakker, D.M. et al. “Bluetooth End to End”, M&T Books, an imprint of Hungry Mind, HungryMinds, Inc., ISBN: 0-7645-4887-5, 7 pages; 2002. |
Blankenbeckler, D. “An Introduction to Bluetooth” ThinkBurst Media, Inc.; www.wirelessdevnet.com/channels/bluetooth/features/bluetooth.html, pp. 1-7, Jul. 23, 2004. |
Ing. Zdenek Mikeska, “Parameters of Bluetooth receiver and transmitter”, Jan. 2, 2004, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic, pp. 1-9. |
Darabi, H. et al., “A 2.4-GHz CMOS Transceiver for Bluetooth”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 12, Dec. 2001. |
broadcast.com “BCM2002X GHz Bluetooth Frac-N-Radio” Product Brief 2003. |
Andreani, P. et al., “A CMOS gm-C IF Filter for Bluetooth”, in Proceedings of CICC 2000, paper 18-6, May 2000, 4 pages. |
Crols, J. et al., “A Single-Chip 900 MHz CMOS Receiver Front-End with a High Performance Low-IF Topology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 12, Dec. 1995, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium. |
Abidi, A., “Direct-Conversion Radio Transceivers for Digital Communications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 12, Dec. 1995, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, pp. 1390-1411. |
Steyaert, M., “A 1-GHz Single-Chip Quadrature Modulator”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 27, No. 8, Aug. 1992, pp. 1194-1197. |
Glas, J., “Digital I/Q Imbalance Compensation in a Low-IF Receiver”; IEEE Globecom, pp. 1461-1466, Nov. 1998. |
Boccuzzi, V. et al., “Testing the Double Low-IF Receiver Architecture”; Proceedings of the CICC, IEEE, 1997, pp. 521-524. |
Valkama et al., “BSS Based I/O Imbalance Compensation in Communication Receivers in the Presence of Symbol Timing Errors”, Proc. Second Int. Workshop Independent Component Analysis Blind Signal Separation, Helsinki, Finland, Jun. 2000, pp. 393-398. |
Sevenhans, J. et al., “An Analog Radio Front-end Chip Set for a 1.9 GHz Mobile Radio Telephone Application” 1994 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 16, 1994. |
Voorman, J.O., “Continuous-time analog integrated filters”; Integrated Continuous-Time Filters, New York IEEE Press, 1993. |
Crols, J. et al., “An Analog Integrated Polyphase Filter for a High Performance Low-IF Receiver”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium. |
Gingell, M.J., “Single Sideband Modulation using Sequence Asymmetric Polyphase Networks”; Electrical Communication—vol. 48, No. 1 and 2—1973. |
Jantzi, S., “A Fourth-Order Bandpass Sigma-Delta Modulator”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, No. 3, Mar. 1993. |
Crols, J. et al., “A 1.5 GHz Highly Linear CMOS Downconversion Mixer”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 7, Jul. 1993. |
Gardner, F., Chapter 8 “Phaselock Receivers and Transponders,” “Phaselock Techniques” ISBN: 0-471-04294-3, Apr. 1979. |
Stetzler, T. et al., “A 2.7-4.5 V Single Chip GSM Transceiver RF Integrated Circuit,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 12, Dec. 1995. |
Crols, J., et al., “Low-IF Topologies for High-Performance Analog Front Ends of Fully Integrated Receivers,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 45, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 269-282. |
Groshong, R. et al., “Undersampling Techniques Simplify Digital Radio”, Application Note AN-301, published by Analog Devices, Inc., reprinted from Electronic Design; pp. 3-95-3-101; May 23, 1991. |
Van Dooremolen, W.H.A. et al., “A Complete FM Radio on a Chip”; Integrated Circuits, Application Note AN192; Philips Semiconductors; Dec. 1991. |
Kasperkovitz, D., “An Integrated FM Receiver”; Microelectronics Reliability, v. 21(2); pp. 183-189; 1981. |
Kasperkovitz, W.G., “FM Receivers for Mono and Stereo on a Single Chip”; Philips Technical Review; V. 41(6); pp. 169-182; 1983/84. |
Olmstead, C. et al., “Digital IF Processing”, RF Design; pp. 30-40; Sep. 1994. |
Cavers, J. et al., “A DSP-Based Alternative to Direct Conversion Receivers for Digital Mobile Communications”; pp. 2024-2029; IEEE, 1990. |
Cavers, J. et al., “Adaptive Compensation for Imbalance and Offset Losses in Direct Conversion Transceivers”; IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology; vol. 42, No. 4; pp. 581-588; Nov. 1993. |
Gray et al., “Future Directions in Silicon ICs for RF Personal Communications”; Custom Integrated Circuits Conference; pp. 83-90; 1995. |
Paez-Borrallo, J. et al., “Self Adjusting Digital Image Rejection Receiver for Mobile Communications”; IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference; vol. 2; pp. 686-690; Mar. 1997. |
Oscarsson, F. et at., “Wideband HF Receiver with Digital Quadrature Splitting”; Proceedings on the Fourth International Conference on Signal Processing Applications and Technology; pp. 1267-1271, 1993. |
Vanwelsenaers, A., et al., “Alcatel Chip Set for GSM Handportable Terminal”; Proceedings of 5th Nordic Seminar on Digital Mobile Radio Communications DMR V; Helsinki Finland; pp. 265-271; Dec. 1-3, 1992. |
Gibson, J.D., “The Communications Handbook,” 1997, pp. 87-93, 181-182, 367-371, 1321-1322. |
Translation of Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2006 for Japanese Application No. 10-536563. |
Atikinson S., et al. “Fast Silicon Aids RF and System Design”, New Electronics, International Thomson Publishing, London, GB, Jun. 1993 (3 pgs.). |
Ericsson, Ericsson Technology Licensing—Bluetooth, pp. 1-5; www.ericsson.com/bluetooth; <http://www.ericsson.com/bluetooth>; Jul. 23, 2004. |
Gentile, K., Fundamentals of Digital Quadrature Modulation, “RE Mixed Signals”, pp. 1-5; www.rfdesign.com <http://www.rfdesian.com>; Feb. 2003. |
Wireless, RF, and Cable; Application Note 686, pp. 1-7; www.maxim-ic.com; <http://www. maxim-ic com>; Oct. 13, 2000. |
Steber, J. M., “PSK Demodulation” (Part 1); WJ Tech-note; vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 1-6; WJ Communications, Inc.; San Jose, CA; Mar. 1984. |
Fague, D. E. et al., “Performance Evaluation of a Low Cost, Solid State Radio Front End for DECT”; IEEE; pp. 512-515; 1994. |
Min, J., “Analysis & Design of a Frequency-Hopped Spread-Spectrum Transceiver for Wireless Personal Communications”; UCLA Electrical Engineering Dept.; Los Angeles, CA; pp. 1-158; Jan. 1996. |
Steyaert, M. et al., “Analog Polyphase Filters in Highly Integrated Receivers”, AACD; Heverlee, Belgium; pp. 364-369; Mar. 30, 1994. |
Steyaert, M. et al., “Analog Integrated Polyphase Filters”; Analog Circuit Design; Eindhoven, Netherlands; pp. 149-166; 1995. |
Defrance, J. J., “Communications Electronics Circuits”; Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY; pp. 262-265; 1966. |
Roberts, R.S., “Television Engineering”; Pentech Press, London, England; pp. 45-47; 1985. |
Baltus, P. et al., “DECT Zero IF Receiver Front End”; Analog Circuit Design; Kluwer Academic Publishers; pp. 295-318; Netherlands; 1994. |
Rabaey, D. et al., “The Challenges for Analog Circuit Design in Mobile Radio VLSI Chips”; Analog Circuit Design; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands; pp. 225-236; 1994. |
Sevenhans, J. et al., “An Integrated Si Biopolar RE Transceiver for a Zero IF 900 MHz GSM Digital Mobile Radio Frontend of a Hand Portable Phone”; 1991 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference; pp. 7.7.1-7.7.4; 1991. |
Okanobu, T. et al., “Advanced Low Voltage Single Chip Radio IC”; IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics; vol. 38, No. 3; pp. 465-475; Aug. 1992. |
Crols, J. et al., “A Fully Integrated 900 MHz CMOS Double Quadrature Downconverter”; 1995 IEEE International Solid-State Conference; pp. 136-137; Feb. 1995. |
Min, J. et al., “A Low-Power Correlation Detector for Binary FSK Direct-Conversion Receivers”; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Jun. 22, 1995. |
Chan, P.Y. et al., “A Highly Linear 1-GHz CMOS Downconversion Mixer”; European Solid State Circuits Conference, Seville, Spain, pp. 210-213, slides pp. 1-25; Sep. 22, 1993. |
Abidi, A. A., “Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits for Portable Communications”; Custom IC Conference, San Diego, CA; pp. 151-158; May 1994. |
Rofougaran, A. et al., “A 1 GHz CMOS RF Front-End IC with Wide Dynamic Range”; European Solid State Circuits Conference, Lille, France, pp. 250-253, slides pp. 1-23; Sep. 1995. |
Rofougaran, A. et al., “A 900 MHz CMOS LC-Oscillator with Quadrature Outputs”; International Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 1-10; 1996. |
Burt, A., “Direct Conversion Receivers Come of Age in the Paging World”; GEC Review, vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 156-160; 1992. |
Abidi, A. A., “Low-Power Radio-Frequency IC's for Portable Communications”; Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 544-569; Apr. 1995. |
Abidi, A. A., “Noise in Active Resonators and the Available Dynamic Range”; IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 296-299; Apr. 1992. |
Tucker, D. G., “The History of the Homodyne and Synchrodyne”; Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers, pp. 143-154; Jan. 4, 1954. |
Vance, I.A.W., “Fully Integrated Radio Paging Receiver”; IEEE Proc. vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 2-6; Feb. 1982. |
Yamasaki, K. et al., “Credit Card Size Numeric Display Pager with Micro-Strip Antenna for 900 MHz Band”; NEC Res. & Develop., vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 84-95; Jan. 1993. |
Tanaka, S. et al., “High-Frequency, Low-Voltage Circuit Technology for VHF Paging Receiver”; IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, vol. E76-A, No. 2, p. 156-163; Feb. 1993. |
Yamasaki, K. et al., “Compact Size Numeric Display Pager with new Receiving System”; NEC Res. & Develop., vol. 33, No. 1; pp. 73-81; Jan. 1992. |
Marshall, C. et al., “A 2.7V GSM Transceiver ICs with On-Chip Filtering”; Paper TA 8.7, IEEE ISSCC; pp. 148-149; Feb. 16, 1995. |
Lin, Y. et al., “A 13-b 2.5-MHz Self-Calibrated Pipelined ND Converter in 3 μm CMOS”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 26,—No. 4; pp. 628-636; Apr. 1991. |
Leeson, D.B., “A Simple Model of Feedback Oscillator Noise Spectrum”; IEEE Proceedings Letters; pp. 329-220; Feb. 1966. |
Chang, H. Y et al. “Large-Suspended Inductors on Silicon and Their Use in a 2-μm CMOS RF Amplifier”; IEEE Electronic Device Letters; vol. 14, No. 5; pp. 246-248; May 1993. |
Enam, S. K. et al., “NMOS IC's for Clock and Data Regeneration in Gigabit-per-Second Optical-Fiber Receivers”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 27, No. 12; pp. 1763-1774; Dec. 1992. |
Buchwald, A.W. et al., “High Speed Voltage-Controlled Oscillator with Quadrature Outputs”; pp. 1-2; Dec. 19, 1990. |
Thomas, V. et al. “A One-Chip 2 GHz Single Superhet Receiver for 2 Mb/s FSK Radio Communication”; Paper WP 2.7; Digest of Technical Papers; IEEE ISSCC; pp. 42-43; Feb. 16, 1994. |
Veit, W. et al., “A 2.7V 800 MHz-2.1 GHz Transceiver Chipset for Mobile Radio Applications in 25GHz ft Si-Bipolar”; 1994 Bi-Polar/BiCMOS Circuits & Technology Meeting 11.2; pp. 175-178; 1994. |
Negus, K. et al., “Highly-Integrated Transmitter RFIC with Monolithic Narrowband Tuning for Digital Cellular Handsets”; Paper WP 2.5; IEEE ISSCC, Digest of Technical Papers; pp. 38-39; Feb. 16, 1994. |
Takahashi, C. et al., “A 1.9GHz Si Direct Conversion Receiver IC for QPSK Modulation Systems”; IEEE ISSCC, Paper TA 8.2, Digest of Technical Papers; pp. 138-139; Feb. 16, 1995. |
Liu, H-C. et al., “A Low-Power Baseband Receiver IC for Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum Applications”; IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference: pp. 311-314; 1995. |
Thamsirianunt, M. et al., “CMOS VCOs for PLL Frequency Synthesis in GHz Digital Mobile Radio Communications”; IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference; pp. 331-334; 1995. |
Moniz, J.M. et al., “Improving the Dynamic Range of Si MMIC Gilbert Cell Mixers for Homodyne Receivers”; IEEE 1994 Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium; pp. 103-106; 1994. |
Weaver, Jr., D. K., “A Third Method of Generation and Detection of Single-Sideband Signals”; Proceedings of the IRE; pp. 1703-1705; Dec. 1956. |
Koullias, I. A. et al., “A 900MHz Transceiver Chip Set for Dual-Mode Cellular Radio Mobile Terminals”; IEEE ISSCC; Paper TP 9.2; pp. 140-141; Feb. 25, 1993. |
Min, J. et al., “An All-CMOS Architecture for a Low-Power Frequency-Hopped 900 MHz Spread Spectrum Transceiver”; IEEE 1994 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference; pp. 379-382; 1994. |
Wilson, J. F. et al., “A Single-Chip VHF and UHF Receiver for Radio Paging”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 26, No. 12; pp. 1944-1950; Dec. 1991. |
Deeney, M., “Software Radio—the End of RF Design?”: Teltec Ireland, A Supplement to Technology Ireland; Telecommunications Research & Development; Nov. 1996. |
Standard Search Report for RS 99030 dated Jul. 23, 1997 completed Jul. 21, 1997. |
Hess, K. M. et al., “Performance Evaluation of a Single Chip Radio Transceiver”; National Semiconductor Corporation; XP000593123; Vehicular Technology Conference, Mobile Technology for the Human Race Atlanta, Apr. 28-May 1, 1996; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; Published Apr. 28, 1996; pp. 1048-1051. |
Gibson , J. D., “The Communication Handbook”; A CRC handbook published in cooperation with IEEE Press: Cover Pages and pp. 87-93; 1996. |
Baines, R., “The DSP Bottleneck”; IEEE Communications Magazine; vol. 33, No. 5; pp. 46-54; May 1995. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140092719 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13205984 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14093842 | US | |
Parent | 12501616 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13205984 | US | |
Parent | 11044287 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12501616 | US | |
Parent | 10822594 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11044287 | US | |
Parent | 10626025 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10822594 | US | |
Parent | 08803392 | Feb 1997 | US |
Child | 10626025 | US |