The present invention is an improved radiographic sensor positioning system. In particular, the present invention is directed to a system for positioning a digital dental radiographic sensor in a patient's mouth and for positioning a radiographic device to interact with the sensor.
Several dental radiographic systems are known including U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,540,399, 6,203,195, 6,527,422, 6,461,038, 6,343,875, 6,203,195, 6,102,566, 5,677,537, and 5,652,779. Digital dental radiography is a relatively new procedure for examining a patient's teeth using significantly less radiation than traditional dental x-rays used to examine teeth. The procedure uses a sensor that is placed in the patient's mouth. Next, a source of gamma radiation is directed to the sensor. The sensor comprises pixels in an array that are influenced by the gamma radiation passing through the patient's teeth, and the pixels form an image which can be transmitted to a monitor for real-time viewing. One benefit of the procedure is that the amount of radiation needed to activate the sensor is far less than the amount of radiation that the patient is exposed to during x-ray procedures. Another benefit is the evaluation of real-time images allowing the dentist to reposition the sensor or acquire more images if needed without the delay associated with developing x-ray images on film. The images generally have a higher resolution than x-rays and can be manipulated using software to zoom and contrast and make more precise diagnostics.
The present invention is an improved radiographic sensor positioning system. In particular, the present invention is directed to a system for positioning a digital dental radiographic sensor in a patient's mouth and for positioning a radiographic device, preferably a gamma ray source, to interact with the sensor. A preferred embodiment of the dental radiography positioning system comprises an aimer ring that slides onto either a posterior imaging or an anterior imaging bar. The posterior imaging bar has a posterior aimer ring bar and a posterior imaging platform for mounting a posterior sensor holder. The posterior sensor holder has a tab for mounting it to the posterior imaging platform. The anterior imaging bar has an anterior aimer ring bar and an anterior imaging platform for mounting an anterior sensor holder. The anterior sensor holder has two arms for mounting it to the anterior imaging platform. Preferably, the posterior imaging bar comprises an imaging arm supporting the opposing posterior imaging platforms. The opposing posterior imaging platforms can each be used for taking upper and lower posterior dental radiographic images on a patient's right and left side.
The objects and features of the present invention, which are believed to be novel, are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The present invention, both as to its organization and manner of operation, together with further objects and advantages, may best be understood by reference to the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a is a bottom view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior imaging bar;
b is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior imaging bar;
c is a front view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior imaging bar;
a is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior sensor holder holding a sensor and being held by a hemostat;
b is an end view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior sensor holder;
c is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior sensor holder;
d is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior sensor holder;
e is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the posterior sensor holder for the #2 digital dental sensor;
a is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the anterior imaging bar;
b is a top view of a preferred embodiment of the anterior imaging bar;
a is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the anterior sensor holder;
b is a rear view of a preferred embodiment of the anterior sensor holder;
c is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the anterior sensor holder holding a digital dental sensor and being held by a hemostat;
The following description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Various modifications, however, will remain readily apparent to those skilled in the art, since the general principles of the present invention have been defined herein specifically to provide an improved radiography positioning system.
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring now to
The slots 22 can support a posterior sensor holder 30. Preferably, the slots have a radius-ed interior 23 as shown (and as shown in
Preferably, the posterior imaging bar has indentations 25 surrounding the slots 22 as shown in
Referring to
The imaging bar 26 preferably further comprises a pair of raised sensor supports 21 to prevent unwanted movement of the sensor 100 while the sensor 100 is inserted into the posterior sensor holder 30. The raised sensor supports 21, visible in
Referring now to
Referring now to
It should be noted that, in general, there are two sizes of digital dental sensors. The two sizes being most often referred to as either a #1 or #2 sensor; the #1 sensor being smaller than the #2 sensor. Accordingly, there are preferably two sizes of posterior sensor holder 30. The posterior sensor holder 30 for use with the #1 sensor is shown in
This barrier 150 is used to reduce the need to sterilize the sensor 100 in between uses and patients. Instead, the barrier 150 is removed and discarded and a new barrier 150 applied.
The sensor 100, after being inserted in the barrier 150, is inserted into the posterior sensor holder 30. The barrier 150 provides the additional advantage of providing a more snug fit within the posterior sensor holder 30 (and, alternately, within the anterior sensor holder 50 as well). The posterior imaging bar 20, sensor holder 30, and sensor 100 with barrier 150 are inserted into the patient's mouth for the desired dental image. The patient then bites down on the bite surface 23 by the inserted sensor holder 30. As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The positioning system in general reduces the occurrences of “cone cuts” and other undesired images. This reduces the number of image re-takes necessary, and thus, saves time and reduces the radiation exposure for the patient and dental staff.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
The preferred embodiment of the system 10 also includes a horizontal bitewing. The preferred horizontal bitewing is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,676 that is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Thus, the system can position a digital dental sensor to acquire anterior, posterior and horizontal bitewing images.
The preferred embodiment of the system 10 also includes a vertical bitewing 70 as shown in
The posterior imaging bar 20 and the anterior imaging bar 60 are preferably made of material that can be hot (e.g. autoclaveable) or cold sterilized. Preferably, the bars 20, 60 are made of thermoplastic capable of withstanding temperatures of 220° F. for one hour without degradation such as high heat resistant grade polypropylene copolymer. The material should be capable of being hot and/or cold sterilization. The sensor holders 30 and 50 are preferably made of a material capable of only a single use. The material used for the sensor holders 30, 50 should show bite marks or discoloration or some other indicia that discourages re-use of the holders 30, 50 after a single use. Preferred materials for sensor holders 30, 50 include polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, and nylon. Preferred melt flow ranges for these materials can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,676 incorporated herein by reference.
Thus, an improved radiographic sensor positioning system is described above that is capable of positioning a digital dental sensor for anterior and posterior dental images. In each of the above embodiments, the different positions and structures of the present invention are described separately in each of the embodiments. However, it is the full intention of the inventor of the present invention that the separate aspects of each embodiment described herein may be combined with the other embodiments described herein. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that adaptations and modifications of the just-described preferred embodiment can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the system's sensor holders could be re-configured to hold dental x-ray film for more traditional dental imaging. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010281 | Valkenberg | Aug 1935 | A |
2075491 | Wilson | Mar 1937 | A |
2240336 | Kreider | Apr 1941 | A |
2286748 | Martin | Jun 1942 | A |
2522201 | Stern | Sep 1950 | A |
2736814 | Lederman et al. | Feb 1956 | A |
2782317 | Vacanti et al. | Feb 1957 | A |
2831978 | Narvestad | Apr 1958 | A |
3356845 | Bergendal | Dec 1967 | A |
4075494 | Jermyn | Feb 1978 | A |
4108308 | Franke et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4251732 | Fried | Feb 1981 | A |
4489427 | Allison et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4554676 | Maldonado et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4592084 | McAuslan | May 1986 | A |
4593401 | Colbert | Jun 1986 | A |
4815117 | Waldo | Mar 1989 | A |
4916724 | Kilber | Apr 1990 | A |
5022065 | Wijkstrom | Jun 1991 | A |
5044009 | Klauser | Aug 1991 | A |
5119410 | Donato | Jun 1992 | A |
5289522 | Kanbar et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5327477 | Levy | Jul 1994 | A |
5422927 | Schmitz | Jun 1995 | A |
5450465 | Tanaka | Sep 1995 | A |
5652779 | Levy et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5677537 | Pfeiffer | Oct 1997 | A |
5799058 | Willis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6033111 | Winters et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102566 | Willis | Aug 2000 | A |
6190042 | Dove et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203195 | Willis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6343875 | Eppinger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6461038 | Pellegrini et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520676 | Schmitz | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527442 | Carroll | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540399 | Eppinger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050013412 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |