The present invention relates to the field of radionavigation, more specifically to a device for tracking a radionavigation signal (or radioelectric navigation signal). The field of application of the invention is in particular the reception of radionavigation signals transmitted by satellite positioning system transmitters (known for short as GNSS or “Global Navigation Satellite System”), for example GPS (“Global Positioning System”), Galileo, Glonass, QZSS, Compass, IRNSS, etc.
Generally, the radionavigation signals transmitted by the satellites (or pseudolites) of a positioning system take the form of a carrier modulated by a spreading waveform containing a pseudo-random binary code. Since modulating the carrier causes spreading of the spectrum around the frequency of the carrier, radionavigation signals are frequently referred to as “spread-spectrum”. The pseudo-random codes constitute an identifier of the signal and therefore of the transmitting satellite. Known to the receivers, said codes provide the receivers with Code Distribution Multiple Access (CDMA). Incidentally, certain satellite positioning signals may also carry useful data (for example the navigation message) in the form of a binary sequence (at a substantially lower rate than the pseudo-random code) additionally modulated on the carrier. This payload of useful data will be disregarded hereafter.
In the case of GPS, radionavigation signals are transmitted in the L1 frequency band, centered on 1575.42 MHz, the L2 frequency band, centered on 1227.6 MHz and the L5 frequency band, centered on 1176.45 MHz. The satellites of the European GNSS (also known as “Galileo”) will transmit in the bands: E2-L1-E1 (the median band portion L1 being the same as that for GPS), E5a (which, according to Galileo nomenclature, is the L5 band provided for GPS), E5b (centered on 1207.14 MHz) and E6 (centered on 1278.75 MHz). Hereafter, the E5a and E5b bands will be treated together as the E5 band, with 1191.795 MHz as the central frequency. In the case of Galileo's open signals, a complete description may be found in “Galileo Open Service Signal-In-Space Interface Control Document”, or Galileo OS SIS ICD, available on the website http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/satnav/galileo/open-service/Index_en.htm. It may also be noted that the satellites of the Compass constellation transmit or will transmit in band B1 (centered on 1561.098 MHz), B1-2 (centered on 1589.742 MHz), L1 (centered on 1575.42 MHz), B2 (centered on 1207.14 MHz) and B3 (centered on 1268.52 MHz). The GLONASS system uses the central frequencies 1602 MHz and 1246 MHz. The stated central frequencies are the frequencies of the carriers of the various signals.
Receiving a radionavigation signal normally involves multiplying the received signal by an internal replica of the carrier generated in the receiver by an oscillator driven by a carrier tracking loop and another multiplication by an internal replica of the spreading waveform produced by a waveform generator driven by a spreading waveform tracking loop (also known as a “code tracking loop”). The error or servo signals of the carrier and spreading waveform tracking loops are used by the receiver to determine its position. The signal representing the phase difference between the carrier of the received signal and the internal carrier replica produced at each time step by the carrier tracking loop provides a first measurement or observable (the phase measurement or observable). The time offset signal between the spreading waveform of the received signal and the internal spreading waveform replica produced at each time step by the spreading waveform tracking loop represents a second measurement or observable (the code measurement or observable).
The phase observable is not used by all receivers. Inexpensive receivers in particular determine their position solely on the basis of code observations. Phase measurements are implemented, for example, in the RTK (“Real Time Kinematic”) and PPP (“Precise Point Positioning”) methods.
Code measurements have meter-level accuracy while phase measurements have an accuracy of a few mm. However, phase measurements have the major drawback of being ambiguous in that the number of integer cycles between the satellite and the receiver is unknown at the outset. Phase measurements are modulo one cycle and only provide the real part of the carrier phase difference between transmission by the satellite and the receiver. In order to be able to benefit from the accuracy of phase measurements, a receiver must be able to resolve the ambiguities associated therewith.
Carrier phase tracking of a radionavigation signal is very sensitive to environmental conditions. The risk of dropout is much higher than for code tracking. Furthermore, managing cycle slip is a difficult task. In a challenging environment (for example in an urban area), availability of phase measurements is likely to be very low, so making receivers capable of carrying out and processing phase observations very much less worthwhile.
The invention is directed toward increasing the robustness of phase measurements.
The invention proposes a radionavigation signal tracking device comprising a first tracking stage of a first radionavigation signal contained in an incoming signal to be applied to the device and a second tracking stage of a second radionavigation signal contained in the incoming signal. The first radionavigation signal is assumed to comprise a first carrier at a first frequency modulated by a first spreading waveform, while the second radionavigation signal is assumed to comprise a second carrier at a second frequency, different from the first frequency, modulated by a second spreading waveform. The first tracking stage comprises a first carrier phase-locked loop with a mixer configured to multiply the incoming signal with a local replica of the first carrier. The first carrier phase-locked loop comprises a phase discriminator of the first carrier configured to produce a first error signal arising from a first phase difference between the first carrier and the local replica of the first carrier. The first carrier phase-locked loop is configured to adjust the phase of the local replica of the first carrier on the basis of the first error signal. The second tracking stage comprises a second carrier phase-locked loop with a mixer configured to multiply the incoming signal with a local replica of the second carrier. The second carrier phase-locked loop comprises a phase discriminator of the beat between the first carrier and the second carrier configured to produce a second error signal arising from a difference between the first phase difference and a second phase difference between the second carrier and the local replica of the second carrier. The second phase-locked loop is configured to adjust the phase of the local replica of the second carrier on the basis of the first and second error signals.
It will be noted that the device according to the invention may be used for the purposes of a dual-frequency or multifrequency GNSS receiver. Instead of tracking the first and second radionavigation signals individually (i.e. using separate phase tracking loops), the tracking device of the invention uses phase-locked loops which are coupled to one another. The phase of the first radionavigation signal is tracked on the basis of the first error signal while the phase of the second radionavigation signal is tracked by using the first error signal and the second error signal which is dependent on the beat phase between the two carriers. In the present document, the term “beat” denotes the periodic variation in the amplitude of oscillation arising from the composition of two carriers. The beat signal has the frequency |f1−f2| where f1 and f2 respectively represent the first and the second carrier frequency. The beat phase is dependent on the phase of each of the two carriers. It is intuitively clear that knowing the phase of one of the carriers and the beat phase makes it possible to obtain the phase of the other carrier. In the tracking device according to the invention, the phase tracking loop of the second carrier adjusts the phase of the local replica of the second carrier by using this property. One advantage of this approach is that the device according to the invention only directly tracks the phase of the first carrier. The second phase-locked loop tracks the beat, which is at a frequency (|f1−f2|) distinctly lower than the frequency of the second carrier. Since this frequency is lower, the number of phase jumps per unit time is considerably reduced relative to the carriers, which makes measurement of the beat phase highly robust. The method used by the device according to the invention thus permits more robust joint tracking of the phase of two radionavigation signals originating from the same transmitter (satellite or pseudolite).
The first phase-locked loop preferably comprises a numerically controlled oscillator (NCO), controlled by a first filter receiving the first error signal as input. The second phase-locked loop preferably comprises a numerically controlled oscillator controlled by the first filter and a second filter (of the second phase-locked loop) receiving the second error signal as input. The second filter may comprise, for example, a Kalman filter, an extended Kalman filter or a particle filter.
Preferably, the first and second radionavigation signals are selected from among Galileo E1, E5 and E6 signals or among GPS L5, L2C and L1 signals or alternatively among GLONASS L3, G2 and G1 signals. The method used by the device according to the invention is particularly advantageous if the carrier phase tracking of one of the signals is significantly more robust than the tracking of the other signal(s). In such a situation, the signal having the most robust carrier phase tracking may be selected as the first radionavigation signal. The carrier phase of the other radionavigation signals need not be tracked directly but may be identified on the basis of the beat phase. According to one advantageous embodiment of the invention, the first radionavigation signal is a Galileo E5 signal and the second radionavigation signal is a Galileo E1 signal or a Galileo E6 signal. Due to the “AltBOC” modulation of the Galileo E5 signal, the carrier phase of this signal can be more robustly tracked than that of the E1 (CBOC modulation) or E6 signal.
The first tracking stage preferably comprises a first correlator configured to correlate a local replica of the first spreading waveform with the incoming signal multiplied by the local replica of the first carrier. The phase discriminator of the first carrier may be configured so as to determine the first error signal on the basis of the correlation result produced by the first correlator.
The second tracking stage preferably comprises a second correlator configured to correlate a local replica of the second spreading waveform with the incoming signal multiplied by the local replica of the second carrier. The phase discriminator of the beat between the first carrier and the second carrier may be configured to determine the second error signal on the basis of the correlation result produced by the first correlator and the correlation result produced by the second correlator.
Preferably, the phase discriminator of the beat between the first carrier and the second carrier is configured such that it uses either the product of the correlation result provided by the first correlator and the complex conjugate of the correlation result provided by the second correlator, or the product of the complex conjugate of the correlation result produced by the first correlator and the correlation result produced by the second correlator to produce the second error signal.
The device according to the invention may be configured to process three or even more radionavigation signals jointly. In this case, a third tracking stage of a third radionavigation signal should be provided. The third radionavigation signal is assumed to comprise a third carrier at a third frequency, different from the first and second frequencies, modulated by a third spreading waveform. The third tracking stage is preferably of the same structure as the second tracking stage. It may in particular comprise a second carrier phase-locked loop with a mixer configured to multiply the incoming signal with a local replica of the second carrier. The third carrier phase-locked loop may comprise a phase discriminator of a beat between the first carrier and the third carrier configured to produce a third error signal arising from a difference between the first phase difference and a third phase difference between the third carrier and the local replica of the third carrier. The third phase-locked loop is then configured to adjust the phase of the local replica of the third carrier on the basis of the first and third error signals. The first, second and third radionavigation signals are preferably selected from among Galileo E1, E5 and E6 signals or among GPS L5, L2C and L1 signals or alternatively among GLONASS L3, G2 and G1 signals.
The third phase-locked loop preferably comprises a numerically controlled oscillator controlled by the first filter and a third filter (of the third phase-locked loop) receiving the third error signal as input. Otherwise, the numerically controlled oscillator may be controlled by the same Kalman filter, the extended Kalman filter or the particle filter which drives the numerically controlled oscillator of the second loop.
The third tracking stage preferably comprises a third correlator configured to correlate a local replica of the third spreading waveform with the incoming signal multiplied by the local replica of the third carrier. The phase discriminator of the beat between the first carrier and the third carrier may then determine the third error signal on the basis of the correlation result produced by the first correlator and the correlation result produced by the third correlator.
The phase discriminator of the beat between the first carrier and the third carrier is configured to use the product of the correlation result produced by the first correlator and of the complex conjugate of the correlation result produced by the third correlator or the product of the complex conjugate of the correlation result produced by the first correlator and of the correlation result produced by the third correlator to produce the third error signal.
It will be understood that the device according to the invention may be embodied by a digital signal processor (DSP).
One aspect of the invention relates to a GNSS receiver comprising one or more radionavigation signal tracking devices as described.
Other distinctive features and characteristics of the invention will emerge from the detailed description of some advantageous embodiments given below by way of illustration with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
A radionavigation signal receiver can carry out code measurements (which are unambiguous) and phase measurements (ambiguous in terms of an integer number of cycles) on the radionavigation signals which it receives from the various satellites which are in visibility (i.e. above the horizon). A multifrequency receiver may carry out these measurements on at least two distinct carrier frequencies f1 and f2. Assuming a dual-frequency receiver, for each satellite in visibility and at each time step (tk), there may therefore be two code measurements, notated P1j(tk) and P2j(tk), and two phase measurements, notated φ1j(tk) and φ2j(tk), on the frequencies f1 and f2, where upper index (j) indicates the transmitter (satellite or pseudolite) from which the signal arriving at the receiver originates. Since the satellites orbit the Earth, only some of them are visible at a given moment from the location of the receiver. To simplify notation, time dependence and the satellite index will not always be explicitly indicated hereafter.
The following notations will be used:
where c represents the speed of light.
The code and phase measurements satisfy the following equations (measurements on the left, model parameters on the right):
P1=r+Δ1iono+cΔh
P2=r+Δ2iono+cΔh
λ1Φ1=r+λ1W−Δ1iono+cΔh+λ1N1
λ2Φ2=r+λ2W−Δ2iono+cΔh+λ2N2 (Eq. 1)
where
In above system of equations, the code measurements P1, P2 are expressed in units of length, while the phase measurements φ1, φ2 are expressed in cycles.
The widelane combination is defined as follows:
where
The beat wavelength is notated λw=c/(f1−f2)=(1/λ1−1/λ2)−1. The beat wavelength between Galileo frequencies E1 and E5 amounts, for example, to roughly 78 cm.
The incoming signal comprises the radionavigation signals at frequency f1 and at frequency f2 transmitted by the various satellites in visibility. The signals originating from the same transmitter are processed jointly. In contrast, combined tracking of signals originating from different transmitters is not provided. A GNSS receiver therefore comprises a number of tracking devices 10 corresponding to the number of satellites (or pseudolites) which the receiver must be capable of tracking in parallel.
The first tracking stage 12 comprises a mixer 16 which multiplies the incoming signal with a local replica of the carrier E5, generated by a numerically controlled oscillator 18. In complex notation, the local replica of carrier E5 is written exp(2π{circumflex over (f)}1t+{circumflex over (φ)}1), where {circumflex over (f)}1 is the estimate of the frequency (variable because subject to the Doppler effect) and {circumflex over (φ)}1 the estimate of the real value of the carrier phase φ1 (in radians). An “in-phase” channel, notated I, and a “quadrature-phase” channel, notated Q, are obtained at the output of the mixer 16 and are applied to a correlation stage 24.
In the correlation stage 24, channels I and Q are each multiplied by a local replica of the spreading waveform and integrated. The spreading waveform replica generators are shown in
The pseudo-random code replica which is mixed with the I and Q channels by the mixers 28 is notated C1(t−{circumflex over (τ)}1) where {circumflex over (τ)}1 is the estimate of the real value of the code offset τ1 and C1 the function which can assume the values +1 and −1 describing the pseudo-random code. P1=c{circumflex over (τ)}1 is obtained when the code tracking loop is picked up.
The output from the correlators 30 is used by a phase- and frequency-locked loop. A phase discriminator 32 generates an error signal indicating the residual phase error, i.e. the difference between the phase estimate {circumflex over (φ)}1 and the real value φ1. The error signal is notated δ{circumflex over (φ)}1=φ1−{circumflex over (φ)}1. The phase discriminator may be an “a tan 2” discriminator; in this case, δ{circumflex over (φ)}1(tk)=a tan 2(QP1(tk),IP1(tk)), where QP1(tk) is the result of correlation on the quadrature-phase prompt channel (index “P”) and IP1(tk) is the result of correlation on the in-phase prompt channel. A frequency discriminator (not shown in
where T=tk−tk-1. A loop filter 34 receives the phase and frequency error signals and derives therefrom the control signal of the numerically controlled oscillator 18.
The output from the correlators 30 is furthermore used by a code-locked loop (or code tracking loop). A “code” discriminator 36 generates an error signal indicating the residual code offset error, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (τ)}1=τ1−{circumflex over (τ)}1. This discriminator may be, for example, an “early-late normalized” discriminator which calculates:
where
with ΔEL being the time offset between the early correlators and the late correlators. IE1, QE1 are the outputs from the early correlators and IL1, QL1 are the outputs from the late correlators. The code offset error signal is applied to a code loop filter 38 which derives therefrom the control signal of the spreading waveform generators (here represented by the code generators 26).
The second tracking stage 14 comprises a mixer 40 which multiplies the incoming signal with a local replica of the carrier E1, generated by a numerically controlled oscillator 42. In complex notation, the local replica of the carrier E1 is written exp(2π{circumflex over (f)}2t+{circumflex over (φ)}2), where {circumflex over (f)}2 is the estimate of the frequency and {circumflex over (φ)}2 the estimate of the real value of the phase φ2 of the carrier E1 (in radians). The “in-phase” output, notated I, and the “quadrature-phase” output, notated Q, of the mixer are applied to a correlation stage 44.
In the correlation stage 44, the mixers 48 multiply each of channels I and Q with a local replica of the spreading waveform and the correlators 50 integrate the I and Q channels. The spreading waveform replica generators are shown on
The output from the correlators 50 acts as the input to a code tracking loop. A code discriminator 52 generates an error signal indicating the residual code offset error, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (τ)}2=τ2−{circumflex over (τ)}2. This discriminator may be, for example, an “early-late normalized” discriminator. The code offset error signal is applied to a code loop filter 54 which derives therefrom the control signal of the spreading waveform generators (here represented by the code generators 46). The code tracking loop of the E5 and E1 signals are therefore of similar construction in this example. It should, however, be noted that the various discriminators must be selected as a function of the modulation of the radionavigation signals and a possible payload (navigation message). The various criteria for selecting the appropriate discriminators are well-known in the art and therefore need not be repeated in the present context.
The phase- and frequency-locked loop for tracking the second radionavigation signal combines the output from the prompt correlators of the first tracking stage 12 with the output from the prompt correlators of the second tracking stage 14. The output from the prompt correlators of the first tracking stage 12 is written, in complex notation, IP1(tk)+jQP1(tk), which may be represented by A1 exp(j(φ1−{circumflex over (φ)}1))=A1 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}1). Similarly, the output from the prompt correlators of the second tracking stage 14 is written, in complex notation, IP2(tk)+jQP2(tk) which may be represented by A2 exp(j(φ2−{circumflex over (φ)}2))=A2 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}2). The complex conjugation module 58 returns A1 exp(−j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}1) and the complex multiplication module 56 therefore calculates A1A2 exp(j·(δ{circumflex over (φ)}1−δ{circumflex over (φ)}2). The parameter δ{circumflex over (φ)}1−δ{circumflex over (φ)}2, which will be notated δ{circumflex over (φ)}w corresponds to the beat phase between the first carrier and the second carrier.
The phase discriminator 60 generates an error signal arising from a difference between the first phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}1 (or phase deviation) and the second phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}2 (or phase deviation). The phase discriminator 60, which returns δ{circumflex over (φ)}w as error signal, may be an “a tan 2” type discriminator.
A frequency discriminator (not shown in
The outputs from discriminators 32, 36, 52 and 60 may be used by a positioning module (not shown in
The incoming signal comprises the radionavigation signals at frequencies f1, f2 and f3 transmitted by the various satellites in visibility. The signals originating from the same transmitter are processed jointly. In contrast, combined tracking of signals originating from different transmitters is not provided. A GNSS receiver therefore comprises a number of tracking devices 110 corresponding to the number of satellites (or pseudolites) which the receiver must be capable of tracking in parallel.
The first tracking stage 112 has essentially the same architecture as the first tracking stage of the embodiment of
In the first correlation stage, the I and Q channels are mixed with replicas of the spreading waveform and integrated. The correlator outputs are applied to a code discriminator, which generates un error signal indicating the residual code offset error, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (τ)}1=τ1−{circumflex over (τ)}1. A code tracking loop filter (not shown) derives therefrom the estimate {circumflex over (τ)}1 of the code offset and uses it to control a numerically controlled oscillator, which in turn provides the clock signal which drives the spreading waveform replica generators.
The output from the correlators 130 (A1 exp(j(φ1−{circumflex over (φ)}1))=A1 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}1) in complex notation) is also used by a phase discriminator 132, which generates an error signal indicating the residual phase error, i.e. the difference between the estimate {circumflex over (φ)}1 of the phase and the real value φ1. A frequency discriminator (not shown in
In the second tracking stage 114, the incoming signal is mixed in a mixer 140 with a local replica of the carrier E1, notated exp(2π{circumflex over (f)}2t+{circumflex over (φ)}2). The I and Q channels obtained in this manner are then correlated with a replica of the spreading waveform. The output from the correlators 150 (A2 exp(j(φ2−{circumflex over (φ)}2))=A2 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}2) in complex notation) is combined with the output from the correlators 130 by a discriminator 160 of the beat phase between the first and the second carriers. The phase discriminator 160 generates an error signal arising from a difference between the first phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}1 and the second phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}2. The phase discriminator 160 returns δ{circumflex over (φ)}w12=δ{circumflex over (φ)}1−δ{circumflex over (φ)}2 as error signal. The second tracking stage 114 furthermore comprises a frequency discriminator (not shown) which produces an error signal indicating the beat frequency error between the first and the third carriers, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (f)}w12=fw12−{circumflex over (f)}w12, with fw12=f1−f2.
The third tracking stage 114′ is of similar construction to the second tracking stage 114. In the third tracking stage 114′, the incoming signal is mixed in a mixer 140′ with a local replica of the carrier E6, notated exp(2π{circumflex over (f)}3t+{circumflex over (φ)}3). The I and Q channels obtained in this manner are then correlated with a replica of the spreading waveform. The output from the correlators 150′ (A3 exp(j(φ3−{circumflex over (φ)}3))=A3 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}3) in complex notation) is combined with the output from the correlators 130 by a discriminator 160′ of the beat phase between the first and the third carriers. The phase discriminator 160′ generates an error signal arising from a difference between the first phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}1 and the third phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}3. The phase discriminator 160′ returns δ{circumflex over (φ)}w13=δ{circumflex over (φ)}1−δ{circumflex over (φ)}3 as error signal. The third tracking stage 114′ furthermore comprises a frequency discriminator (not shown) which produces an error signal indicating the beat frequency error between the first and the third carriers, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (f)}w13=fw13−{circumflex over (f)}w13, with fw13=f1−f3.
The output from the correlators 150′ (A3 exp(j(φ3−{circumflex over (φ)}3))=A3 exp(j·δ{circumflex over (φ)}3) in complex notation) is furthermore combined with the output from the correlators 150 by a discriminator 160″ of the beat phase between the second and the third carriers. The phase discriminator 160″ generates an error signal arising from a difference between the second phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}2 and the third phase difference δ{circumflex over (φ)}3 The phase discriminator 160″ therefore returns δ{circumflex over (φ)}w23=δ{circumflex over (φ)}2−δ{circumflex over (φ)}3 as error signal. A frequency discriminator (not shown) which produces an error signal indicating the beat frequency error between the second and the third carriers, i.e. the difference δ{circumflex over (f)}w23=fw23−{circumflex over (f)}w23, with fw23=f2−f3, may also be provided.
The outputs from discriminators 136, 160, 160′, 160″ and from the frequency discriminators (not shown) are processed in an extended Kalman filter 120. The measurement vector applied to the extended Kalman filter 120 may therefore be written: z=[cδ{circumflex over (τ)}1,δ{circumflex over (φ)}w12,δ{circumflex over (f)}w12,δ{circumflex over (φ)}w13,δ{circumflex over (f)}w13,δ{circumflex over (φ)}w23,δ{circumflex over (f)}w23]T. The output obtained from the extended Kalman filter is the state vector: x=[δ{circumflex over (ρ)}τ,δ{circumflex over (ρ)}φ,δ{circumflex over ({dot over (ρ)})},δ{umlaut over ({circumflex over (ρ)})}]T, where δ{circumflex over (ρ)}τ denotes the estimated change in the pseudodistance between the satellite and the receiver since the previous time step, δ{circumflex over (ρ)}φ the estimated change, with the ambiguity regarding the integer number of cycles, in the pseudodistance between the satellite and the receiver since the previous time step, δ{circumflex over ({dot over (ρ)})} the estimated change in the relative speed between the satellite and the receiver since the previous time step and δ{umlaut over ({circumflex over (ρ)})} the estimated change in relative acceleration between the satellite and the receiver since the previous time step. Using the notation X=[{circumflex over (ρ)}τ,{circumflex over (ρ)}φ,{circumflex over ({dot over (ρ)})},δ{umlaut over ({circumflex over (ρ)})}]T, the update rule may be stated as: Xk=FXk-1+xk, where F denotes the transition matrix (dependent on the model) and k is the time step index. The estimate of the delay to code {circumflex over (τ)}1 is obtained by {circumflex over (τ)}1={circumflex over (ρ)}τ/c, {circumflex over (τ)}2 by {circumflex over (τ)}2={circumflex over (ρ)}τ/c, {circumflex over (τ)}3 by {circumflex over (τ)}3={circumflex over (ρ)}τ/c, {circumflex over (f)}w12 by {circumflex over (f)}w12={circumflex over ({dot over (ρ)})}τ/λw12, {circumflex over (φ)}w12 by {circumflex over (φ)}w12={circumflex over (ρ)}φ·2π/λw12, {circumflex over (f)}w13 by {circumflex over (f)}w13={circumflex over ({dot over (ρ)})}τ/λw13 and {circumflex over (φ)}w13 by {circumflex over (φ)}w13={circumflex over (ρ)}φ·2π/λw13. These outputs are used to control the NCOs of the tracking device 110.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 50211 | Jan 2013 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3883873 | Mosyakov et al. | May 1975 | A |
4097805 | Fujii | Jun 1978 | A |
5311149 | Wagner | May 1994 | A |
20030058163 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050101248 | Vollath | May 2005 | A1 |
20100079333 | Janky | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100208775 | Weill | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110298661 | Buck | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120121087 | Psiaki | May 2012 | A1 |
20140062771 | Lebrat | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U. Vollath, “Analysis of Three-Carrier Ambiguity Resolution Technique for Precise Relative Positioning in GNSS-2”, Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Vo.46, No, , Spring 1999, pp. 13-23. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140191903 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |