Patent Grant
11919550
The present application is based on PCT filing PCT/JP2018/028057, filed Jul. 26, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a rail breakage detection device which detects breakage of railroad rails and a rail breakage result management system which uses the rail breakage detection device.
Conventionally, the railroad rail breakage detection is made possible by a track circuit for train position detection. In recent years, introduction of a wireless train control system (communication-based train control: CBTC) which does not use the track circuit for train position detection is in progress; and thus, a rail breakage detection method which does not use the track circuit is required. One of the rail breakage detection methods which do not use the track circuit is a breakage detection method utilizing return current.
Current supplied from a substation to a rail car through an overhead line during the train travel is consumed by the rail car and then returns to the substation via the rails. The current returning to the substation through the rails is called return current. The return currents flow through a pair of rails in the same direction, meets at an electrical neutral point of an impedance bond installed at each of block sections of the rails, and then branches again and flows into the rails of the adjacent block section. If there is no abnormality such as rail breakage, the return currents flowing from the rail car to the pair of rails show balanced values. However, if one of the pair of rails is broken, the return current leaks into the ground at the broken rail side, so imbalance occurs in the return currents flowing through the pair of rails.
Patent Document 1 discloses a rail breakage detection method, a rail breakage detection device, and a rail breakage point detection method using the device, and describes a technology in which the return currents are measured on the rail car; the imbalance ratio of the return currents flowing through the pair of rails is calculated; and thus the breakage of the rails is detected.
In a rail breakage detection device disclosed in Patent Document 2, it is described that a first detection section L1 is set in one of the pair of rails and a second detection section L2 is set in the other, and that rail breakage is detected from the imbalance occurring between a first voltage drop signal V1 generated in the first detection section L1 by the return current and a second voltage drop signal V2 generated in the second detection section L2 by the return current.
In the rail breakage detection method, the rail breakage detection device, and the rail breakage point detection method using the device that are described in Patent Document 1, the return current is measured on the rail car based on a principle equivalent to that of the rail breakage detection method used in an automatic train control (ATC), etc. However, since the return current is a direct current or a low-frequency current, it is difficult to measure the return current accurately on the rail car. Also, since the resistance component of the rail is extremely small, it is necessary to lengthen the detection section in order to detect breakage of rails accurately using the rail breakage detection device described in Patent Document 2. However, if the detection section is made long, the configuration becomes complicated because it is necessary to lay down long conducting wires along the rails.
The present disclosure is made in order to solve the above problems and an object is to obtain a rail breakage detection device which can detect breakage of rails and a rail breakage result management system using the rail breakage detection device with a simple configuration.
A rail breakage detection device according to the present disclosure comprises:
a first core part that is provided annularly along a circumferential direction of a first cable electrically connecting an electrical neutral point of an impedance bond to a prescribed block section of a first rail, the impedance bond electrically connecting the first rail and a second rail in a pair,
a second core part that is provided annularly along a circumferential direction of a second cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to the prescribed block section of the second rail,
a first coil that is wound around the first core part to generate a first electromotive force in accordance with a current variation occurring in the first cable, and
a second coil that is connected electrically to the first coil, is wound around the second core part to generate a second electromotive force in accordance with a current variation occurring in the second cable, and generates the second electromotive force so as to cancel the first electromotive force out when the current variation occurring in the second cable is identical with the current variation occurring in the first cable in terms of a direction and a magnitude; and
a CPU configured to determine that the first rail or the second rail is broken based on an electromotive force being a sum of the first electromotive force and the second electromotive force.
A rail breakage detection device according to the present disclosure comprises:
a first core part that is provided annularly along a circumferential direction of a first cable electrically connecting an electrical neutral point of an impedance bond to a prescribed block section of the first rail, and made of a magnetic material to generate a first magnetic flux in accordance with return current flowing through the first cable, the impedance bond electrically connecting a first rail and a second rail in a pair,
a second core part that is provided annularly along a circumferential direction of a second cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to the prescribed block section of the second rail, is mechanically connected to the first core part, generates a second magnetic flux in accordance with return current flowing through the second cable, and is made of a magnetic material to generate the second magnetic flux so as to cancel the first magnetic flux out when the return current flowing through the second cable is identical with the return current flowing through the first cable in terms of a direction and a magnitude, and
a Hall element that is disposed in a gap provided in either the first core part or the second core part to generate an electromotive force in accordance with a sum of the first magnetic flux and the second magnetic flux; and
a CPU configured to determine that the first rail or the second rail is broken based on the electromotive force generated by the Hall element.
A rail breakage result management system according to the present disclosure includes:
the rail breakage detection device described above; and
a management server to store a breakage detection result of rails detected by the rail breakage detection device and a management number in association with each other, the management number being assigned individually to a block section of rails, wherein
the rail breakage detection device includes an information output unit to output the breakage detection result of the rails and the management number to the management server via a network.
The rail breakage detection device according to the present disclosure makes it possible to detect breakage of rails with a simple configuration.
The rail breakage result management system according to the present disclosure makes it possible to detect breakage of rails with a simple configuration.
Hereinafter, referring to the attached drawings, embodiments of the rail breakage detection device disclosed in the present application will be described in detail. Note that the following embodiments are just examples, and the present disclosure is not limited by these embodiments.
In
Regarding in which block section the rail breakage detection device 100 is to be installed to determine the breakage of the rail, it is decided before or at the time when the rail breakage detection device 100 is installed. In the following description, a case where the electromotive force generating unit 11 is attached to the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b will be described.
The rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 is configured to perform breakage determination by using the breakage determination unit 12 to detect breakage of the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b when an electromotive force is generated in the electromotive force generating unit 11. A detailed configuration of the rail breakage detection device 100 will be described later.
Typically, the return currents flowing through the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b show different values every time. Therefore, when measuring the return currents and detecting breakage of the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b, it is necessary to measure the current values of the return currents every time they flow and to detect breakage using a threshold in accordance with the current values measured.
In contrast, in the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1, the electromotive force generating unit 11 is configured not to generate the electromotive force when current variations of the same magnitude and direction occur in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b by the return currents. In other words, the configuration is such that the electromotive force generating unit 11 generates the electromotive force in a case where imbalance occurs in the current variations of the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b caused by imbalance that occurs in the return currents flowing through the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b when the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b is broken.
Therefore, regardless of the magnitude of the return current, the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 can detect breakage of the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b when the electromotive force generating unit 11 generates the electromotive force. Further, since it is not necessary to measure the current values of the return current, the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 can detect rail breakage with a simple configuration.
Next, detailed configurations of the electromotive force generating unit 11 and the breakage determination unit 12 of the rail breakage detection device 100 will be described.
The electromotive force generating unit 11 includes a first core part 111a annularly provided in the circumferential direction of the first cable 41a, a second core part 111b annularly provided in the circumferential direction of the second cable 41b, a first coil 112a which is wound around the first core part 111a and generates a first electromotive force in accordance with the current variation that occurs in the first cable 41a, and a second coil 112b which is wound around the second core part 111b and generates a second electromotive force in accordance with the current variation that occurs in the second cable 41b. The shapes of the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b is not limited to an annular shape and, for example, may be a polygonal shape such as a triangular shape or a square shape, or an oval shape.
The first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are made of a magnetic material. By the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b made of a magnetic material, a magnetic flux generated in accordance with the current variation that occurs in the first cable 41a can be prevented from leaking outside the first core part 111a, and a magnetic flux generated in accordance with the current variation that occurs in the second cable 41b can be prevented from leaking outside the second core part 111b. Therefore, the positions where the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are provided can be changed accordingly, and as a result, the configuration of the rail breakage detection device 100 can be simplified.
Note that the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are not necessarily made of a magnetic material, and for example, they may be made of a non-magnetic material such as plastic. However, when the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are made of a non-magnetic material, it is necessary to place the first coil 112a at a position where the first coil 112a does not generate an electromotive force due to the current variation that occurs in the second cable 41b, and to place the second coil 112b at a position where the second coil 112b does not generate an electromotive force due to the current variation that occurs in the first cable 41a.
The first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are electrically connected. Also, the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are respectively wound around the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b such that the first electromotive force generated by the first coil 112a and the second electromotive force generated by the second coil 112b cancel each other out when current variations of the same magnitude and direction occur in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b. Here, the current variations in the same direction means a case in which both the current flowing from the first rail 2a to the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 via the first cable 41a and the current flowing from the second rail 2b to the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 via the second cable 41b increase or decrease, or a case in which both the current flowing from the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 to the first rail 2a via the first cable 41a and the current flowing from the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 to the second rail 2b via the second cable 41b increase or decrease. Further, the electromotive forces opposite to each other in the direction means that the first electromotive force generated between both ends of the first coil 112a and the second electromotive force generated between both ends of the second coil 112b are in the direction in which their forces are cancelled out with each other.
The electromotive forces generated in the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are represented by Equation (1). Note that i in Equation (1) takes 1 or 2. To be specific, when i=1, in Equation (1), V1 is the first electromotive force, N1 is the number of turns of the first coil 112a, Φ1 is a magnetic flux density generated in the first core part 111a, μ1 is a magnetic permeability of the first core part 111a, and H1 is a magnetic flux generated in the first core part 111a. When i=2, in Equation (1), V2 is the second electromotive force, N2 is the number of turns of the second coil 112b, Φ2 is a magnetic flux density generated in the second core part 111b, μ2 is a magnetic permeability of the second core part 111b, and H2 is a magnetic flux generated in the second core part 111b.
In order to have a configuration in which the electromotive force generating unit 11 will not generate the electromotive force when the current variations of the same magnitude and direction occur in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b, V1 (the first electromotive force) and V2 (the second electromotive force) need to be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. That is, V1=−V2 needs to be held. For example, if V1 (the first electromotive force) and V2 (the second electromotive force) are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction (V1=−V2) and the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are made of the same material and the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are made of the same material, N1=−N2 holds from Equation (1), so that the winding directions of the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are opposite to each other and the numbers of turns of the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are the same.
In other words, the material and shape of the first core part 111a, the material, shape, and the number of turns of the first coil 112a, the material and shape of the second core part 111b, and the material, shape, and the number of turns of the second coil 112b need to be configured such that Equation (1) satisfies V1=−V2 when the current variations of the same magnitude and direction occur in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b.
The breakage determination unit 12 is connected electrically to the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b and measures the electromotive force generated by the electromotive force generating unit 11. When the electromotive force generated by the electromotive force generating unit 11 is greater than or equal to a threshold, the breakage determination unit 12 performs breakage determination of the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b. The threshold is determined, for example, by measuring in advance values of the electromotive force generated by the electromotive force generating unit 11 when the train 1 travels with the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b unbroken, and by calculating an average and a standard deviation of the electromotive force. Specifically, the threshold is determined on the basis of Equation (2). Here, Vh is a threshold value, V0 is an average of the electromotive force, σ is a standard deviation thereof, and a is a value determined in accordance with the required accuracy of the rail breakage detection.
Vh=V0+ασ (2)
The magnitude of the magnetic flux that is generated in each of the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b by the currents respectively flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b is determined according to Ampere's law. That is, when the direction of the normal vector Na and the direction of the current flowing through the first cable 41a are made parallel and the direction of the normal vector Nb and the direction of the current flowing through the second cable 41b are made parallel, the magnetic flux generated in each of the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b becomes the largest. As a result, the electromotive forces generated by the electromotive force generating unit 11 in accordance with the current variations occurring in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b increase. Therefore, by providing the first cable 41a in parallel with the normal vector Na and the second cable 41b in parallel with the normal vector Nb, it is possible to accurately detect the current variations occurring in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b.
Next, how the return current flows will be described separately for a case where neither the first rail 2a nor the second rail 2b is broken as compared to a case where the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b is broken.
If neither the first rail 2a nor the second rail 2b is broken, the return currents flowing through the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the block section A1 pass through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b of the impedance bond 4b, meet at the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4b, pass through the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b of the impedance bond 4b, and flow into the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the adjacent block section A2. The return current flows in the same manner when flowing from the block section A2 to the block section A3.
As shown in
Next, how the return current flows when the second rail 2b is broken will be described.
Since no breakage occurs in the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b in the block section A1, the current variations occurring in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b of the impedance bond 4b are balanced. Also, the current variations occurring in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b of the impedance bond 4a are balanced.
However, in the block section A2, the breakage B occurs in the second rail 2b, so that only leakage current based on a leakage impedance component between the second rail 2b and the ground flows through the second rail 2b in the block section A2. Generally, in a railroad, since the leakage impedance is set to be large, the return current flowing through the second rail 2b of the block section A2 is small. Therefore, imbalance occurs in the return currents flowing through the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the block section A2, so that the current variations occurring in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b of the impedance bond 4c are imbalanced. In addition, with the breakage B occurring in the second rail 2b of the block section A2, the current variations occurring in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b of the impedance bond 4b are also imbalanced.
Due to the breakage B, the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b of the impedance bond 4c become imbalanced. Even so, the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b of the impedance bond 4c meet at the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4c, pass through the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b of the impedance bond 4c, and flow into the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the adjacent block section A3. Since no breakage occurs in the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the block section A3, the current variations occurring in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b of the impedance bond 4c are balanced, and the return currents flowing through the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b of the block section A3 are balanced.
Therefore, as shown in
As described using
On the other hand, as described using
The rail breakage detection device 100 detects the rail breakage when the current variations occurring in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b are imbalanced. That is, in the case shown in
Further, when the first rail 2a or the second rail 2b is broken, the current variations occurring in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b respectively connected to the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b in the block section where the rail breakage occurs are also imbalanced. Therefore, even in a case where a configuration in which the electromotive force generating unit 11 is attached to the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b is adopted, the rail breakage detection device 100 can detect rail breakage in the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b respectively connected to the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b when the current variations occurring in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b are imbalanced.
Note that, also even in a configuration in which the electromotive force generating unit 11 is attached to the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b, the electromotive force generating unit 11 is configured not to generate the electromotive force when the current variations of the same magnitude and direction occur in the third cable 43a and the fourth cable 43b. Here, the current variations in the same direction means a case in which both the current flowing from the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 to the first rail 2a via the third cable 43a and the current flowing from the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 to the second rail 2b via the fourth cable 43b increase or decrease, or a case in which both the current flowing from the first rail 2a to the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 via the third cable 43a and the current flowing from the second rail 2b to the electrical neutral point P of the impedance bond 4 via the fourth cable 43b increase or decrease.
The rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 comprises:
the electromotive force generating unit including
the first core part that is provided annularly along the circumferential direction of the first cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to a prescribed block section of the first rail, the impedance bond electrically connecting the first rail and the second rail in a pair,
the second core part that is provided annularly along the circumferential direction of the second cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to a prescribed block section of the second rail,
the first coil that is wound around the first core part to generate the first electromotive force in accordance with a current variation occurring in the first cable, and
the second coil that is connected electrically to the first coil, is wound around the second core part to generate the second electromotive force in accordance with a current variation occurring in the second cable, and generates the second electromotive force so as to cancel the first electromotive force out when the current variation occurring in the second cable is identical with the current variation occurring in the first cable in terms a direction and a magnitude,
the electromotive force generating unit generating an electromotive force being a sum of the first electromotive force and the second electromotive force; and
the breakage determination unit to determine that the first rail or the second rail is broken based on the electromotive force generated by the electromotive force generating unit.
Further, the breakage determination unit of the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 is characterized in that the rail breakage in the first rail or the second rail is determined when the electromotive force generated by the electromotive force generating unit is greater than or equal to the predetermined threshold.
With the above configuration, the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 can detect the rail breakage with a simple configuration and reduce the maintenance load.
Further, the first core part and the second core part of the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 are characterized in that they are made of a magnetic material.
With the above configuration, in the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1, the positions where the first coil 112a and the second coil 112b are provided can be changed accordingly, and thus the configuration of the rail breakage detection device 100 can be simplified.
Further, the first core part and the second core part of the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 are characterized in that each part has a gap therein.
With the above configuration, in the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1, it is easy to attach the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b to the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b, respectively.
Further, the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 is characterized in that the direction of the normal vector of the opening plane formed in an inner side of the first core part and the direction of the current flowing through the first cable are parallel and the direction of the normal vector of the opening plane formed in an inner side of the second core part and the direction of the current flowing through the second cable are parallel.
With the above configuration, the rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 can accurately detect the current variations generated in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b.
A configuration of a rail breakage detection device 200 according to Embodiment 2 of the present disclosure will be described. Note that description of the configurations which are the same as or corresponding to those of Embodiment 1 will be omitted, and only different portions of the configurations will be described. The rail breakage detection device 100 according to Embodiment 1 is configured to detect a case where imbalance occurs in the current variations of the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b, that is, a moment when a rail is broken. In contrast, in the rail breakage detection device 200 according to Embodiment 2, it is possible to detect a case where imbalance exists in the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b; that is, it can detect a state in which a rail is broken.
The
The first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are made of a magnetic material and generate a magnetic flux in accordance with the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b. The first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are mechanically connected.
In the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b according to Embodiment 2, when the return currents of the same magnitude and direction flow in the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b, a first magnetic flux generated in the first core part 111a and a second magnetic flux generated in the second core part 111b cancel each other out. That is, in the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b, when the return currents of the same magnitude and direction flow through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b, no magnetic flux is generated, and when the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b are imbalanced, a magnetic flux is generated. The first core part 111a and the second core part 111b can be made, for example, by twisting an annular member at its intermediate position an odd number of times into an eight-character shape, the annular member being made of a magnetic material.
The Hall element 113 is placed in a gap provided in either the first core part 111a or the second core part 111b. The Hall element 113 is connected to the breakage determination unit 12. Further, the Hall element 113 is supplied with a constant current from the breakage determination unit 12.
The Hall element 113 generates an electromotive force in accordance with the magnetic flux generated by the first core part 111a and the second core part 111b. The breakage determination unit 12 measures the electromotive force generated by the Hall element 113. The breakage determination unit 12 determines the breakage when the electromotive force generated by the Hall element 113 is greater than or equal to a threshold. The threshold is determined, for example, by measuring in advance the values of the electromotive force generated by the Hall element 113 when the train 1 travels with the first rail 2a and the second rail 2b unbroken and by calculating an average and a standard deviation of the electromotive force. Specifically, the threshold is determined based on Equation (2).
The first core part 111a and the second core part 111b are configured such that a magnetic flux is generated when the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b are imbalanced. Therefore, the Hall element 113 generates an electromotive force when the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b are imbalanced.
That is, the Hall element 113 constantly generates an electromotive force while imbalance exists in the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b.
Therefore, the rail breakage detection device 200 according to Embodiment 2 can detect not only a moment when a rail is broken, but also a case where imbalance exists in the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b; that is, it can detect a state in which a rail is broken, and thereby the rail breakage can be detected more accurately.
The rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 2 comprises:
the electromotive force generating unit including
the first core part that is provided annularly along the circumferential direction of the first cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to a prescribed block section of the first rail, and made of a magnetic material to generate the first magnetic flux in accordance with the return current flowing through the first cable, the impedance bond electrically connecting the first rail and the second rail in a pair,
the second core part that is provided annularly along the circumferential direction of the second cable electrically connecting the electrical neutral point of the impedance bond to a prescribed block section of the second rail, is mechanically connected to the first core part, generates the second magnetic flux in accordance with the return current flowing through the second cable, and is made of a magnetic material to generate the second magnetic flux so as to cancel the first magnetic flux out when the return current flowing through the second cable is identical with the return current flowing through the first cable in terms of a direction and a magnitude, and
the Hall element that is disposed in the gap provided in either the first core part or the second core part to generate the electromotive force in accordance with a sum of the first magnetic flux and the second magnetic flux; and
the breakage determination unit that determines that the first rail or the second rail is broken based on the electromotive force generated by the Hall element of the electromotive force generating unit.
With the above configuration, the rail breakage detection device 200 according to Embodiment 2 can detect the case where imbalance exists in the return currents flowing through the first cable 41a and the second cable 41b; that is, it can detect the state in which a rail is broken, and thereby rail breakage can be detected more accurately.
Next, a rail breakage result management system which manages breakage detection results of rails using the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2 will be described.
The breakage determination unit 12 of the rail breakage detection device 100 includes an information output unit 121. The information output unit 121 is connected to the management server 7 via a network. The network is, for example, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a bus, or a private line. If the breakage detection results of the rails and management numbers of the block sections can be outputted to the management server 7, the information output unit 121 does not need to be included in the breakage determination unit 12, and communication equipment or the like separated from the breakage determination unit 12 may be used.
The breakage determination unit 12 stores the management numbers of the block sections in advance. The breakage detection results of the rails and the management numbers of the block sections are outputted to the management server 7 from the information output unit 121 via the network. The management numbers of the block sections are the numbers assigned to each of the block sections of the rails, and each are the number for specifying a position of a block section.
The management server 7, which is a server apparatus operated by a railway management business operator, etc., receives the breakage detection results of the rails outputted from the information output unit 121 and the management numbers of the block sections via the network and stores the breakage detection results of the rails and the management numbers of the block sections in association with each other.
The management server 7 includes a control unit 71a which controls the entire operation of the management server 7, an information storage unit 71b which stores information etc., received via the network, and a communication unit 71c which sends and receives information via the network.
The information storage unit 71b stores the breakage detection results of the rails and the management numbers of the block sections that are received from the information output unit 121 via the network, in association with each other.
The rail breakage result management system according to Embodiment 3 includes:
the rail breakage detection device according to Embodiment 1 or 2; and
the management server to store the breakage detection result of the rails detected by the rail breakage detection device and the management number in association with each other, the management number being assigned individually to a block section of rails, wherein
the rail breakage detection device comprises the information output unit to output the breakage detection result of the rails and the management number to the management server via the network.
With the above configuration, the rail breakage result management system according to Embodiment 3 can appropriately manage the block section in which the breakage occurs.
Within the scope of the invention, some of the embodiments disclosed here can be freely combined, and each of the embodiments can be accordingly modified or omitted.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2018/028057 | 7/26/2018 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2020/021672 | 1/30/2020 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4145018 | Poggio | Mar 1979 | A |
| 9682716 | Noffsinger | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9834237 | Plotnikov | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 11067539 | Hay | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 20060118678 | Wells, II | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20130284859 | Polivka | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130334373 | Malone, Jr. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140012438 | Shoppa | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20190047600 | Asuka et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 107985344 | May 2018 | CN |
| 06-321110 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 2012-91671 | May 2012 | JP |
| WO-2014193610 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2017175277 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2018, received for PCT Application PCT/JP2018/028057, Filed on Jul. 26, 2018, 9 pages including English Translation. |
| Indian Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2022 in Indian Application No. 20212700294. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210269075 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
