The present application is the U.S. National phase of PCT/AU2011/000930 filed Jul. 25, 2011 which claims priority to Australian Patent Application No. 2010903316 filed Jul. 23, 2010 and Australian Patent Application No. 2010904465 filed Oct. 5, 2010, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention relates to a rail conveyor system and has been devised particularly though not solely for transporting bulk materials over distances in the order of 10 to 100 kilometers.
In the past, belt conveyors have typically been used to convey bulk materials over distances of up to 20 kilometers. Such bulk materials would typically include coal, iron ore, bauxite etc. Transportation distances vary considerably depending on operational requirements but much of this bulk material is presently transported many tens, or even hundreds of kilometers to the processing plant, power station or export terminal. The choice of bulk handling system depends on the transportation distance, throughput and terrain, and in most cases will rely on belt conveyors, in combination with haul trucks and/or railway systems.
Increasing fuel prices and the need to lower greenhouse gas emissions, coupled with the increasing demand for minerals, has seen considerable pressure to maximise the efficiency and economy of overland bulk material transportation systems.
Belt conveyors being continuous, rather than a batch transportation system are used wherever they are technically and economically feasible. Additionally, with the demand for automated mining operations, belt conveyors have clear operational advantages. However, due to the inherent motion losses of transportation, the rolling resistance of a belt conveyor is greater than both trucks and railway. These losses effectively limit the operational length of conventional belt conveyors. If belt conveyors were able to transport more efficiently they could transport over longer distances due to reduced cumulative belt tension, and thus compete more favourably with trucks and even railway.
Belt conveyors are typically more economically feasible than trucks up to distances of 25 km, while in some instances this may extend up to 100 km. By comparison, railway systems tend to be more economically feasible for distances greater than 100 km, primarily due to the significant infrastructure costs.
There is therefore a need to provide a more energy efficient and cost effective method for transporting bulk commodities over long distances.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a rail conveyor system including a rail track, a plurality of carriages spaced apart from one another and arranged to run on wheels supported by the track, and a continuous carry belt supported by the carriages.
Preferably, the track is a steel rail track.
Preferably, the wheels are steel wheels arranged to run on the track.
In one form of the invention the steel wheels of the invention are flanged and engage with pairs of rails in a similar manner to a conventional railway system.
Preferably, the carriages are spaced apart and connected together by a driving rope, or ropes, driven by drive means to pull the carriages along the track.
Alternatively, the carriages are spaced apart and connected together by a rope, and driven by the carry belt.
In one form of the invention, the conveyor is driven entirely by the driving rope or belt.
In an alternative form of the invention, the conveyor may be partially or wholely driven by linear motors spaced apart along the track and operable on the carriages.
In yet a further form of the invention, the continuous carry belt is driven by one or more drive belts.
Preferably, the continuous carry belt sits upon the, or each, drive belt and is driven by friction between the drive belt and the continuous carry belt.
In one form of the invention the drive belt comprises a V-belt.
Preferably, the V-belt comprises a multiple V-belt.
In an alternative form of the invention the drive belt comprises a wire rope.
In some applications, the, or each, drive belt is driven and tensioned by distributed drive stations spaced at intervals along the length of the track.
When pairs of rails are used, the carry belt is preferably lifted from the carriages at a head drive station, allowing material to be discharged from the carry belt while the carriages are directed around a return loop before being reunited with the carry belt.
Preferably, a loading chute is provided arranged to direct material on to the carry belt, and a plurality of closely spaced idler rollers are provided beneath the carry belt in the vicinity of the loading chute.
In some embodiments of the invention, pairs of steel wheels in each carriage are connected by a live axle.
In an alternative form of the invention, the track comprises a monorail track and idler rollers are provided depending downwardly from each carriage to engage the side of the monorail track.
Notwithstanding any other forms that may fall within its scope, one preferred form of the invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In one preferred form of the invention, the rail conveyor system is formed by providing a rail track 1 which typically incorporates two side-by-side conventional rails 2 and 3. These rails may be of a similar type to that used in conventional train rail tracks and may either be mounted on the ground on sleepers as for a conventional rail track system or elevated and supported on frames as is well-known for typical belt conveyor systems.
The system further comprises a plurality of carriages 4 spaced apart from one another and running on wheels 5 supported by the tracks 2 and 3.
As can be more clearly seen in
The rail conveyor system according to the invention further incorporates a continuous carry belt 7 which is supported by the carriages 4, typically by being carried in a suitably shaped yolk 8 mounted on each carriage.
Although it is possible to connect and drive the carriages 4 solely by their attachment, either by rigid connection or by friction to the carry belt 7, in one preferred form of the invention the carriages 4 are spaced apart and connected together by a driving rope 9. The driving rope is typically a steel rope, or ropes driven by drive means as will be described further below.
Although it is possible to support the rails 2 and 3 in many different ways, for example by supporting the rails on spaced apart frames or on pylons as is common with conventional belt conveyors, one particularly cost effective method of constructing the conveyor is to locate the conveying run 10 side-by-side with the return run 11, as can be seen in
Where the terrain requires, the two runs of parallel rails may be elevated as shown in
It is also possible to support the carriages on a monorail type construction as can be seen in
There are many different ways of driving and tensioning the rail conveyor system according to the invention but one way is shown in
The belt is separated from the carriages 4 as the belt passes over a large drive pulley 15 where the driving rope 9 and the carriages 4 are inverted around the vertical drive pulley 15 while the conveying run 10 of the carry belt 7 continues to the discharge point 13.
The inverted carriages and the driving rope 9 are then passed around a horizontal drive pulley 16 and returned to the underside of a vertical tensioning pulley 17 where the carriages are returned to an upright position beneath the return run of the carry belt 11.
In this manner the driving rope 9 is able to be driven and tensioned by the set of pulleys 15, 16, 17 while the carry belt 7 is independently taken to conveyor belt drive and discharge point 13 and redirected and tensioned by the series of pulleys 14.
In a simpler form of the invention, typically suited for use over shorter distances, the rope 9 may serve to simply connect the carriages and the carriages may be driven by tension in the conveyor belt 7 driven in a more conventional manner.
Where the rail conveyor system is intended to operate over long distances, it is possible to use distributed drive systems which will allow use of a single carry belt with no need for bulk material transfer points. This can be achieved by the use of multiple drive stations, similar in principle to that shown in
In systems of this nature, it is also desirable to use wire rope dynamic tension monitoring to integrate into the electrical control system for the distributed drive systems.
In an alternative form of distributed drive system, drive belt technology can be used to deliver the driving force to the carry belt via a second high strength drive belt as can be seen in
The carry belt is supported on yolks 8 mounted on each carriage 4 which is supported on wheels 5 running on rails 2 and 3 as previously described.
The drive belt 19 is used to drive the system by friction between the drive belt and the carriage 4, rather than by tension in the wire rope 9.
This friction may be enhanced by a pad 21 on each carriage that in turn supports the drive belt. The pad 21 is typically curved on its top surface in the direction of travel and made from material chosen to enhance friction with the drive belt. The pad reduces belt indentation pressure on the drive belt by increasing the area of contact and therefore the surface area.
The wire rope 9 is normally retained, but only used to maintain the carriage spacing when the drive belt is being driven. In an alternative version, the rope 9 may be omitted altogether.
When using a drive belt system, an alternative head drive layout may be deployed as shown in
The drive belt 19 is then entrained over a drive and tensioning mechanism 33 before being returned to a return portion 34 where it is reunited with the carry belt return portion 35 at a point downstream as will be described further below.
The carry belt 18 is returned from the discharge hopper 32 and entrained over a series of tensioning and drive pulleys 36 before being returned to return run 35 to be reunited with the drive belt 34.
Meanwhile, the carriages 4 which are released from both the drive belt and the carry belt at point 37 proceed along the rail track 2, 3, to return loop 38 as can be seen in
Where thought desirable to control any possible “crabbing” of the carriages throughout the system, it is possible to provide each carriage with a live axle configuration as can be seen in
Using the drive belt configuration, also makes is easier to incorporate distributed drive points along the length of the conveyor as shown in
The drive belt 19 is then elevated from the carriages at point 45 and fed to an intermediate drive station 46 where an interim drive motor 47 is used to further drive the drive belt 19 before it is returned around idler roller 48, under idler roller 49 to be reunited with the carriages at point 44.
Because the carry belt 18 is relatively unsupported in spans between the carriages 4, it is also desirable to provide interim support at a loading point where bulk material impacts upon the carry belt 18 as can be seen in
As the carriages 4 progress around the return loop 38 (
An alternative form of the drive belt concept is to replace the drive belt with a potentially lower cost V-belt as shown in
It is also possible to use a multiple V-belt of the type shown at 57 in
In a still further alternative form of the invention as can be seen in
In many ways, the belt drive technology is superior over both the linear electric drives and the centralised head drive systems described above in delivering maximum available power to the system. Additionally, the drive belt technology is proven and does not rely on the complexity of turning carriages through 90° at the head and tail ends of the conveying system as seen in the version shown in
A rail conveyor system according to the invention has many advantages over conventional long distance belt conveyors.
Firstly and primarily, the efficiency of the system is significantly increased by the reduction in friction between the belt and the rollers which exists in a conventional conveyor belt system. The rolling resistance of belt conveyors comprises the indentation rolling resistance due to the interaction between the belt and the idler rollers, belt and bulk material flexure resistance due to the movement between successive idler roller sets, and rotational resistance of the idler rollers due to bearings and seals. Much of this resistance is overcome using the rail conveyor system according to the invention by the use of steel wheels 5 running on steel tracks 2 and 3 which have a significantly lower rolling resistance.
In this manner, the rail conveyor system according to the invention combines the primary advantages of both belt conveyors and railway systems. The rail conveyor system is a continuous bulk material transportation system that due to the steel track wheels running on steel rails shares a rolling resistance similar in magnitude to railway systems while providing all the continuous delivery advantages of conventional belt conveyor systems.
Further advantages of the rail conveyor system over conventional conveyor belts include lower energy consumption and therefore lower emissions of particulates, NOx and CO2, and also potentially lower capital costs due to the ability to use a lower strength belt compared with conventional long distance belt driven conveyors.
The rail conveyor system also gives the option of using a distributed drive system to reduce loadings on many components in the system, more flexible routing of the conveyor including smaller radius horizontal curves, quieter operation, ease of maintenance and monitoring, and the ability to operate the system more efficiently in low temperatures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010903316 | Jul 2010 | AU | national |
2010904465 | Oct 2010 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2011/000930 | 7/25/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/22/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/009765 | 1/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2115095 | Bugatti | Apr 1938 | A |
3381799 | Havelka | May 1968 | A |
4471700 | Prins | Sep 1984 | A |
4615434 | Lachmann | Oct 1986 | A |
4957405 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5400898 | Weber | Mar 1995 | A |
5868193 | Luginbuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881832 | Zitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6397756 | Saiko et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7004077 | Meindl | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7032744 | Pietsch | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7500552 | Switzeny | Mar 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
816978 | Jul 1959 | GB |
56122708 | Sep 1981 | JP |
546521 | Feb 1977 | RU |
570518 | Sep 1977 | RU |
Entry |
---|
“PCT/AU2011/000930 International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Jun. 26, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130118371 A1 | May 2013 | US |