1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a rail joint assembly for joining rail ends together on railroad track and, more particularly, to a rail joint assembly more efficiently transferring both vertical and longitudinal railway loads through a strengthened rail joint.
2. Discussion of the Background
Early on, railroad operators butted rail ends together and mechanically fastened the rail ends together at the joint with joint bars on each side of the rail held in place by bolts through the web of each rail end.
A need arose to electrically isolate the rail ends from each other for train detection and for traffic control circuits that use the rail as conductors. Insulating adhesives such as epoxy have been used to both strengthen and to electrically isolate the two rail ends. U.S. Pat. No. 3,837,948 sets forth the use of both a thermoplastic adhesive layer which is itself normally electrically insulating to lock the rail ends together and an electrically insulating material such as resin-impregnated cloth. U.S. Design Pat. No. D547,642 shows a wrap-around joint bar sleeve insulator.
A number of prior rail joint designs are directed to approaches that strengthen the rail joint assembly and/or to insulate the two rail ends from each other. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,331 discloses a series of rail bonding adhesives using embedded nonconductive spacers. U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,143 uses an insulating spacer and a layer of epoxy that is sandwiched between a rail joint bar and the railroad rail. U.S. Patent Publication No. US2007/0272762 A1 (Ser. No. 11/420,199) sets forth joint bars with thicker midsections for use with thick web rail. The thicker midsection of the joint bar provides increased support for the joint at the abutment between the rail segments. U.S. Patent Publication No. US2008/0035749 A1 (Ser. No. 11/570,773) provides stiffener plates mounted to the joint bars such that the joint bars and the web portion of the rails are sandwiched between the stiffener plates.
A continued need exists to improve upon such joint designs because both mechanical and/or insulated joints have a lower service life than the rail itself. Generally insulated joints are replaced five to ten times during the service life of the rail and the resulting cost to replace failed mechanical or insulated joints is expensive. Additional costs are incurred due to service delays and service reliability. Rail joints constitute weak points in the track and are affected by railway loads passing over the joint which provide downward forces on the joint and by temperature variations. Railway loads, especially heavy railway loads, cause adhesive failure, failure of the mechanical fasteners, and failure of the joint bar. Wide swings in temperature also provide thermal stress to the rail joints. Insulated adhesive joints when subjected to such environmental stress and railway loads may lose strength. Such premature failures may cause one or more of the mechanical fasteners to then undergo mechanical stress resulting in shearing or cracking of the fastener.
Continuously welded rail (CWR) is used to eliminate the majority of rail joints, but rail joints, especially insulated rail joints, are still needed. The use of CWR has further increased the longitudinal loading on rail joints. Rail joint designs accommodate rail longitudinal movement by providing a space between the rail ends and oval holes in the joint bars. This space makes the joint less efficient in transferring both vertical and longitudinal loads through the joint. Insulated adhesives and mechanical fasteners are also subject to failure under such longitudinal stress as discussed above for vertical wheel loads.
Mechanical joints and Insulated joints represent two basic joints that act differently in the presence of longitudinal movement. Insulated joints do not allow for rail longitudinal movement and are inadequate to carry high longitudinal forces and high live railway loads. Mechanical joints allow for such longitudinal movement, but are weaker for carrying high vertical railway loads.
Three basic types of failure present in conventional mechanical rail joints are mechanical fastener failure, joint bar failure and rail battering. A fourth basic type of failure for insulated joints is adhesive failure. A need exists to provide a rail joint that more efficiently transfers vertical and longitudinal loads through the rail joint that substantially minimizes mechanical fastener failure, joint bar failure and adhesive failure. A need exists to strengthen a rail joint that approaches, equals, or exceeds the service life of the rail itself by substantially strengthening the rail joint assembly to handle railway load forces and environmental forces well exceeding those present.
An object of the invention is address the above needs by providing a rail joint assembly and method, for use with mechanical joints and insulated joints, having opposing pairs of load bearing keys embedded in both the rail web and in the joint bars that cause the web and the joint bars to integrally strengthen and act together, that effectively transfers vertical and horizontal railway loads through the joint and that intercepts the load path between the web and joint bars to minimize failure.
A new rail joint assembly for joining the ends of two rails together at a joint is set forth that strengthens the joint against heavy railway loads and that minimizes the effects of environmental stresses on the joint. The new rail joint assembly includes a pair of joint bars with each joint bar having one side configured to the side of the web. Mechanical fasteners mount the joint bars to the web sides of the two rail ends so that the joint bars span across the joint. The configured sides of the joint bars are held against the opposing sides of the webs of the two rail ends. Pairs of load bearing keys are firmly embedded in web counter bores which are formed at predetermined depths on opposite sides of the web of each rail end and in adjacent corresponding joint bar counter bores which are also formed at predetermined depths into the joint bars when the mechanical fasteners mount the joint bars to the webs of the two rail ends. The pairs of opposing embedded keys in each rail web and in the joint bars transfer railway loads through the joint and substantially strengthen the rail joint assembly by intercepting the load path existing between the joint bars and the webs of each rail end.
A novel method for transferring the forces from a moving railway load on a first rail to a second rail through a rail joint assembly is set forth. Moving railway load forces on the first rail at the joint are transferred through a first pair of load bearing keys embedded between the pair of joint bars in the rail joint assembly and on opposite sides of the web of the first rail. The pair of joint bars couples the transferred forces from the first pair of embedded load bearing keys to a second pair of load bearing keys embedded between joint bars and on opposite of the web of the second rail. The coupled forces are then transferred from the second pair of load bearing keys to the second rail. The method can be used with more than one pair of embedded load bearing keys on each rail end.
In both the new rail joint assembly and method summarized above, the load bearing embedded keys being essentially integral with the rail webs and the joint bars substantially strengthens the rail joint assembly to that of the rails or better. The pairs of load bearing keys can be used in either mechanical rail joint assemblies or insulated rail joint assemblies.
The summary set forth above does not limit the teachings of the invention especially as to variations and other embodiments of the invention as more fully set out the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a is a side planar view of the key of the invention.
b is a front planar view of the key of the invention.
a is a side planar view of a portion of the thick web showing the formed web counter bores of the invention.
b is a front planar view of the thick web of
a is a side planar view of a portion of the joint bar showing the formed web counter bores of the invention.
b is a front planar view of a joint bar
In
Each rail 20a and 20b has a head 22a and 22b, a web 24a and 24b, a base 26a and 26b, and an end 28a and 28b, respectively. The rails 20a and 20b are conventional and are of a thick web, regular web or any desired web construction. In the embodiment of
One side 10a of the rail joint assembly 10 is shown in
In
In
The number of pairs of opposing keys 80 on each rail 20a, 20b can be more or less than two with a resulting change in the number of opposing web counter bore pairs {60a, 60b}. For example, in one embodiment three pairs of opposing keys 80 can be used with three corresponding pairs of opposing web counter bores on each rail end for a total of twelve keys 80. Or, one pair of opposing keys 80 can be used with one corresponding set of opposing web counter bores on each rail end for a total of four keys 80. In yet another embodiment, pairs of directly opposing keys and opposing counter bores are not used. Rather, a single web counter bore is used on a first bolt hole on one side of the web and a second single web counter bore is used on a second bolt hole on the opposing side of the web so that the pair of keys is used on opposite web sides but with each individual key on a different bolt hole as discussed later with respect to
As shown in
Each key 80 has a hole 84 formed by drilling which receives the bolt 50 and which is centered along centerline 90 as best shown in
An adhesive impregnated fiberglass insulator layer 70a on side 10a (70b on side 10b) is shown in
A pair of joint bars 12a and 12b are used to join the two rails 20a and 20b together at joint 30 as shown in
Four adhesive impregnated fiberglass insulator layers 100 are shown in the thick web embodiment of
Four washer plates 110 are also shown in
In summary,
In
The key 80 has a drilled hole 84 for receiving bolt 50 as shown in
The key 80 of
In summary, the key 80 has an integral cylindrical portion on side 500 which outwardly extends a predetermined distance at a given diameter. The joint plate counter bore is formed to receive both the given diameter and the predetermined distance so that the cylindrical portion fully embeds into the joint plate counter bore as shown in
a and 7b show details of the joint bar 12a of
The key 80 is dimensioned to have cylindrical side 500 press fitted into the corresponding joint bar counter bore 96 under pressure of a tool to form an integrated structure with the joint bar. For example, the joint bar is heated, the keys are pressed into the corresponding joint bar counter bores, and then the assembly is cooled. Press fitting the load bearing keys into the joint bar embeds the keys thereby resulting in a substantially integral structure.
The dimensions of the key 80 also determine the corresponding dimensions of the web counter bore 60a (60b). Various tradeoffs exist. The depth 630 of the web counter bore cannot be too shallow as the key 80 must seat in the web counter bore 60a (60b) to bear and transfer the railway and environmental forces present. Yet, the depth 630 cannot be too large as it will weaken the web. For a conventional thick web of two inches and in the design shown in
The installation of the rail joint assembly 10 of the invention to the rails 20a and 20b occurs as follows. At the track, the bolt holes and counter bores are drilled into the locations shown near the rail ends 28a and 28b. Both the joint bars 12a and 12b, with the keys 80 already press fitted in, are placed against the web sides 25 of the rail ends. The bolts 50 are inserted and the nuts 52 placed on. As the nuts 52 are tightened on the bolts 50, the conical shaped surface 520 of each key 80 seats in the conical shaped surface 650 of each corresponding web counter bore 60a (60b). The two conical shapes 520 and 650 cooperate to center the key 80 in the web counter bore 60a (60b) around the centerline 90 until surfaces 510 and 660 meet. The nuts 50 are then torqued to a suitable value to firmly connect the joint assembly 10 of the invention to the rail ends. In the case of insulated joints, the layers 70a, 70b, and 100 are installed using insulated sleeves 51 over bolts 50 as shown in
The keys 80 being embedded on the formed web and joint bar counter bores, as discussed above, cause the web and the joint bars to be an integral part of the surrounding mass of the web, the keys and the joint bars. Together, an embedded key, the web around the formed web counter bore and the area around the formed joint bar counter bore act structurally as a surrounding whole to substantially strengthen the joint, to effectively transfer vertical and horizontal railway loads through the joint and to intercept the load path between the web and joint bars so as to minimize failure.
As shown in
The method as set forth herein transfers the railway forces, such as a moving railway load or from thermal stresses, from the end of a first rail to the end of a second rail through the rail joint assembly as set forth in the figures. Railway forces F, as shown in
In both the novel assembly and method disclosed herein, the pairs of load bearing embedded keys are essentially integral with the rail webs and the joint bars. When the embedded pairs of keys act together as a whole with the webs and the joint bars, the resulting integrated structure provides a highly strengthened rail joint assembly.
A number of other embodiments of the rail joint assembly 10 exist based on variations of the teachings set forth above.
In
Some or all of the keys 80 and the corresponding web and joint bar counter bores do not have to be circular in shape, as shown in
The above disclosure sets forth a number of embodiments of the invention described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in this art will appreciate that various changes, modifications, other structural arrangements, and other embodiments could be practiced under the teachings of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1215897 | Ballou | Feb 1917 | A |
2036633 | Hill | Apr 1936 | A |
2116463 | Livingston | May 1938 | A |
2670136 | Moses | Feb 1954 | A |
3416728 | Hamilton, Jr. | Dec 1968 | A |
3837948 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3952948 | Nelson et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4386736 | Benkler et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
5503331 | Uramson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6832869 | Lauchner | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7090143 | Urmson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D547642 | Urmson et al. | Jul 2007 | S |
7735745 | Igwenezie | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735746 | Igwenezie | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20060027674 | Urmson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070084943 | Roskamp | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272762 | Click et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035749 | Igwenezie | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090302125 | Urmson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100090018 | Akhtar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096468 | Igwemezie | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100090018 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |