Field of the Technology
The present disclosure generally relates to equipment and techniques for milling. The present disclosure more specifically relates to equipment and techniques adapted for milling railway rails.
Description of the Background of the Technology
Railways networks are in use throughout the world for freight and transit alike. Over time, railway rails become worn and irregularities may arise, especially along the railhead profiles. Consequently, railways must be maintained by either replacing or re-profiling worn or deformed rails. For example, rail re-profiling may be undertaken to address common rail deformities such as rail corrugation, which may comprise short to long wavelengths. Corrugations are known to cause noise, vibrations, and premature wheel wear. Rail re-profiling may also be undertaken as part of a regular maintenance schedule aimed at extending the operational life of rails.
To minimize interference with rail traffic and to reduce labor costs, it is often advantageous to re-profile worn rails in situ. While in situ re-profiling may avoid extended offline periods, present re-profiling strategies comprising planing, grinding, and, more recently, peripheral milling are generally slow and/or hazardous endeavors. For example, rail grinding may employ one or more grinding wheels mounted to a rail grinding vehicle. Rail grinding vehicles are known to produce significant quantities of sparks during the grinding process, which may present a significant fire hazard along the railway at its periphery. Conventional rail re-profiling vehicles also are known to produce chatter and may be unable to produce desirable smooth and continuous railhead profiles. Certain conventional rail milling vehicles employ peripheral milling techniques to mill a predetermined profile on the rails. While presenting less fire risk than rail grinding vehicles, rail milling vehicles typically advance along the railway slowly and may require that the railway be taken out of service for an extended period. Rail milling vehicles also may be unable to continuously mill rail. For example, peripheral milling cutters used on such vehicles are designed to form a specific railhead profile and, therefore, are unable to adequately adapt to changing rail conditions such as variations in the railhead profile, curves, or transitions (such as, for example, railway grade crossings). Consequently, the conventional rail milling process may be slowed in order to adjust or replace milling cutters to match the rail profile variations, adapt to changes in the condition of the rails, or address curves or transitions. In some instances, large sections of railway must be ignored or are inadequately milled due to variations or transitions.
Given the foregoing drawbacks, it would be advantageous to develop improved techniques for rail re-profiling.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, a method of milling a profile of a railway rail comprises: rotating a milling cutter including a plurality of face mounted cutting inserts mounted about a periphery thereof; milling a railway rail with cutting edges of the cutting inserts rotating in a predetermined plane corresponding to at least a portion of a desired rail profile while controlling the depth of cut of the cutting inserts; traversing the railway rail with the milling cutter while milling the railway rail; and controlling the speed of traverse of the milling cutter along the railway rail.
According to certain non-limiting embodiments, the method further comprises milling the railway rail with a plurality of milling cutters, each milling cutter including a plurality of face mounted cutting inserts mounted about a periphery thereof. In such method, cutting edges of the cutting inserts of each milling cutter are rotated in a predetermined plane corresponding to at least a portion of a desired rail profile.
According to an additional aspect of the present disclosure, an apparatus for milling at least a portion of a desired profile on a railway rail in situ comprises: a milling cutter including a cutter body comprising a cutter face, wherein the milling cutter is rotatable about a rotation axis; and a plurality of cutting inserts mounted around a periphery of the cutter face. Each of the plurality of cutting inserts comprises a cutting edge extending a distance from the cutter face to engage and mill a profile segment on the railway rail. The rotation axis is substantially perpendicular to the plane of the profile segment to be milled on the railway rail by the cutting inserts.
According to certain non-limiting embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a plurality of milling cutters, each milling cutter including a cutter body rotatable about a rotation axis and a cutter face. A plurality of cutting inserts are mounted around a periphery of the cutter face of each of the plurality of milling cutters, and each of the plurality of cutting inserts comprises a cutting edge extending a distance from the cutter face to engage a railway rail and mill a segment of a desired profile on the railway rail.
According to certain non-limiting embodiments, the apparatus may comprise a rail vehicle on which are mounted the plurality of milling cutters. In certain embodiments, the plurality of milling cutters are individually mounted to respective spindles, and each of the plurality of milling cutters is individually positionable about a railway rail to mill a plurality of segments of a desired profile on the railway rail.
The various embodiments of methods and apparatuses described herein may be better understood by considering the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present disclosure describes various embodiments of apparatuses, milling cutters, milling inserts, and milling methods for re-profiling railway rails. In one embodiment, a milling cutter according to the present disclosure comprises a plurality of cutting inserts. The cutting inserts may be positioned in one or more orientations proximate to a railway rail to be re-profiled. In certain forms, the milling cutter comprises a cutter body configured to retain a plurality of cutting inserts, for example, indexable cutting inserts, thereon. The milling cutter may traverse the railway rail while rotating about a central axis. Each of the plurality of cutting inserts may comprise a cutting edge configured to engage the rail during rotation of the cutter body to thereby remove material from the rail and provide a desired rail profile or rail profile portion or region. In various embodiments, a vehicle is provided including one or more milling cutters configured to mill a desired profile in a railway rail, true the rail, and provide a continuous finish while traversing the rail at speeds greater that 1 mph, such as greater than 3 mph, up to 15 mph, 1 to 15 mph, 5 to 15 mph, 10 to 15 mph, or faster speeds. In certain embodiments, the milling cutter may be mounted on a vehicle and is movable about one or more axes such that the milling cutter may be adjustably positioned proximate to the rail in one or more orientations to restore the rail to a desired profile.
In one embodiment, one or more milling cutters provided on a railway vehicle may be rotatable about a vertical axis or about an axis at an angle to the vertical. For example, a milling cutter comprising a plurality of cutting inserts secured about a periphery of a face of the milling cutter may be positioned proximate to a rail to engage and thereby mill and impart a desired profile or profile portion or region to the rail. According to one embodiment, such a milling strategy may be considered a form of face milling, which the present inventors have discovered allows for high feed rates by suitably distributing chip load. The use of face milling distinctly differs from milling strategies known for rail re-profiling, such as peripheral milling. Peripheral milling may include a cutter mounted and rotated on a horizontal axis, and cutting inserts are spaced about the periphery of the milling cutter in an arrangement defining the profile to be cut. Railway vehicles conducting peripheral milling are not capable of moving at the speeds possible with rail re-profiling methods and apparatuses described herein. The ability to mill profiles into railway rail in situ at higher speeds than conventional peripheral milling re-profiling techniques may reduce the time during which the railway is out of service for re-profiling. In addition to lacking an ability to traverse the rail at high speeds, peripheral milling also lacks an ability to adapt to curved rail sections. Peripheral milling vehicles, which include single cutters defining the form to be cut, may produce deviations from a desired rail profile along curved rails, as well as produce an undesirable scalloped finish on the railhead.
In certain embodiments according to the present disclosure, multiple face milling cutters may be mounted on a rail vehicle and are individually positionable to contact the rail in different orientations to re-profile the rail. The multiple milling cutters may be orientated such that at least two of the milling cutters are positioned to mill different portions or regions of the desired rail profile on the rail. For example, in one embodiment, a first milling cutter may be positioned to mill a first facet on the rail, and a second milling cutter may be positioned to mill a second facet on the rail. Both the first and second facets may be simultaneously milled on different regions of the rail as a vehicle on which the milling cutters are mounted traverses the rail.
In one embodiment according to the present disclosure, the milling cutters may be mounted on one or more dedicated rail vehicles. The milling cutters may each be operably coupled to a dedicated or shared motor operable to rotate the milling cutters at a desired rate. In one embodiment, two or more milling cutters may couple to a positioning member or system configured to position the milling cutter proximate to a rail. The positioning member or system may comprise motors, gears, hydraulics, pumps, or the like. In various forms, the positioning member or system may be manually operated, computer assisted, or automated. For example, in one embodiment, a positioning member or system is operably coupled to a control system configured to control various operations of the milling cutter. In one embodiment, the control system comprises a guidance system. The guidance system may be programmed to scan ahead of the milling cutter, e.g., employing a laser or other detection apparatus, to provide information to the guidance system regarding the characteristics of approaching segments of the rail. The guidance system may use the information to calculate an optimum depth of cut, width of cut, or modification to a milling cutter position or orientation, or supply of power. In various embodiments, the guidance system may control or provide feedback to other system components to modulate a cutting operation, either directly or indirectly. For example, feedback from the guidance system may result in a modification to the position of the spindle head.
Referring to
In operation, the milling cutter 10 may be rotated by the spindle 32 while continuously traversing the rail 11 so that the rail 11 is continuously fed to the rotating cutting inserts 24 positioned about the periphery of the cutter face 18, as generally depicted in
In various embodiments, a rail re-profiling apparatus and method comprises a rotating milling cutter 10 having a plurality of cutting inserts 24 mounted around the periphery 22 of the cutter face 18. According to certain embodiments, the milling cutter 10 may traverse a workpiece, e.g., a railway rail, at a speed of less than 1 mph up to about 15 mph, at 5 to 15 mph, at 10 to 15 mph, or at faster speeds. For example, the milling cutter 10 may be rotated and pass along the rail 11 such that the rail 11 is fed to the rotating milling cutter 10 at a feed rate corresponding to the speed of the vehicle on which the milling cutter 10 is mounted, to produce a desired rail profile.
To develop the disclosed milling apparatuses and methods for re-profiling surfaces on a railway rail while maintaining adequate rail finish and profile, various high feed milling cutter 10 and cutting insert 24 combinations where prepared and tested. In general, a high feed milling cutter 10 was developed that utilizes insert lead angles to create a chip-thinning effect that allows the milling cutter 10 to run at higher than normal feed rates at relatively shallow depths of cut. According to various embodiments, the high feed milling cutter 10 preferably comprises a medium pitch or a fine pitch milling cutter.
The effectiveness of the milling cutter 10 for high speed milling of railway rails has been demonstrated by rotating the milling cutter 10 against a rotating rail steel wheel to simulate traversing a railway rail. Specifically, the milling cutter 10 was mounted to a spindle 32 extending from a 30 horsepower test machine. The milling cutter 10 was rotated counter-clockwise against a 37-inch diameter wheel formed of rail steel that was rotated clockwise at various rotational speeds to correspond to a specific mph. The parameters of this test are provided in
While the heavy feed rate used in the testing, ranging between 0.037 to 0.047 inches per insert per revolution (which may be shortened herein to “inches per insert”), produced less than optimal part finish, the part finish was within acceptable limits. Consequently, the results at 1 mph demonstrated that an acceptable rail finish may be achieved at higher feeds. The results also demonstrated that with the proper milling cutter and cutting insert configurations, higher feed rates may be achieved with acceptable insert wear.
To further demonstrate that railway rails may be milled at high travel speeds while maintaining required rail finish and profile, according to the present disclosure, various milling cutter configurations were mounted to a test machine and used to mill an 11 foot segment of railway rail held in a rotary fixture to facilitate indexing for milling various facet angles on the rail. The test machine was equipped with a 35 horsepower horizontal machining center capable of a maximum linear feed rate of 400 inch per minute (IPM), or about 0.38 mph. In this test, two milling cutter and cutting insert geometries were evaluated using a 10-inch diameter cutter body configured to hold 32 cutting inserts.
A first milling cutter and insert configuration 100 evaluated is shown in
The cutter body 112 extends to a cutter face 118 defining 32 cutting insert positions 120 about a periphery 122 of the cutter face 118. The cutting inserts, e.g., 124x, 124y, are secured within the insert positions 120. Each of the cutting inserts extends a distance from the cutter face 118 and defines a cutting edge 130 extending from the cutter face 118. The cutter body 112 is configured to be rotated about axis “A” in the rotational direction indicated by arrow “R”. The views shown in
A second milling cutter and insert configuration 200 that was evaluated is shown in
As indicated,
In addition to evaluating milling cutter and cutting insert geometries, relative orientations between a milling cutter and a railway rail also were investigated.
As described above, to further demonstrate that rails 11 may be milled at high speeds while maintaining adequate rail finish and profile according to the present disclosure, milling cutters 110, 210, 310, 410, 510, 610 comprising the above cutter body/cutting insert configurations 100, 200 and orientations 300, 400, 500, 600 were mounted to a test machine providing a maximum linear feed rate of 400 IPM (inches per minute) to mill an eleven-foot long railway rail 11 held in a rotary fixture 60 (as shown in
Referring to
As stated above, the maximum linear IPM feed for the test machine used in the test was 400 IPM. Accordingly, to further push linear feed evaluation, in mph, various test passes where run using only 1 or 2 cutting inserts. The parameters for these tests are provided in
To further evaluate insert grades at an increased width of cut, additional tests were performed using cutter configuration 200 and three coated cemented carbide insert grades: Greenleaf® grade GA-5125, Greenleaf® grade G-935, and Greenleaf® grade G-955, all of which are available from Greenleaf Corporation, Saegertown, Pa., USA. The parameters for this test are provided in
Referring to
The milling cutter illustrated in
Cutting insert wear is an important aspect that must be considered in a railway rail re-profiling method. When cutting inserts wear beyond a certain level, they must be indexed or replaced. In some instances, indexing or replacement may be a time-consuming process, and may further increase the time that a railway segment is out of service. To further evaluate insert wear, additional tests were performed using the milling cutter configuration illustrated in
Referring to
In various embodiments, a method of profiling a rail comprises positioning a pair of milling cutters 1024, 1124 proximate to the rail 11, traversing the rail 11, engaging the rail 11 with cutting edges 1030, 1130, and milling the rail 11. For example, a first milling cutter 1024 may be positioned at a first angle and a second milling cutter 1124 may be positioned at a second angle relative to the rail. In one embodiment, the first milling cutter 1024 is positioned proximate to one side of the rail at a first angle to the rail, the second milling cutter 1124 is positioned proximate to the other side of the rail at a second angle to the rail, and the first and second angles are substantially the same (e.g., a-a, b-b in
In various embodiments, milling cutters used according to the present disclosure may include cutting inserts comprising uncoated cemented carbide grades, such as, for example, C6 carbide, or coated cemented carbide grades, such as, for example, coated C6 carbide. Coated carbide grades may be selected from, e.g., PVD or CVD coated carbides. In various alternate embodiments, milling cutters used according to the present disclosure may include cutting inserts comprising uncoated ceramic grades (for example, Greenleaf® WG-300 material) or coated ceramic grades (for example, Greenleaf® WG-600 material).
According to various embodiments, a face milling cutter including a set of 8 cutting inserts mounted thereon may be rotated on a milling cutter at 300 RPM and advance along a railway rail at 1 mph for at least 18,000 feet (ft), 27,000 ft, or farther before requiring indexing or replacement of one or more of the cutting inserts. In a further embodiment, because wear is generally proportional to work performed by the cutting tool, a similar milling cutter configuration comprising a load of 32 cutting inserts may run at 300 RPM and advance along a railway rail at 4 mph for a distance of 108,000 ft (20.45 miles) before requiring indexing or replacement of one or more of the cutting inserts.
As described above, another factor in regard to cutting insert life is depth of cut. As disclosed herein, maintaining depth of cut to around 0.005-0.010 inches may beneficially increase cutting insert life as well as adequately re-profile railway rails without significant removal of material that may otherwise unacceptable shorten the operational life of the rail. However, in various embodiments, it may be desirable or necessary to increase depth of cut beyond 0.010 inches, for example to 0.040 inches or more. In certain embodiments, the method may involves controlling the depth of cut of the cutting inserts to a depth no more than 0.040 inches, no more than about 0.010 inches, or between 0.005 inches and 0.010 inches. Accordingly, unless stated otherwise, the present disclosure is not limited to a 0.0010 inch depth of cut or any other depth of cut described herein.
Also, as described above, one factor to consider in regard to cutting insert life is facet width or width of cut. For example, maintaining facet width on the rail to a minimum, such as 0.31 inches or less in some instances, may result in enhanced cutting insert life. Also, for example, in certain embodiments the width of cut may be limited to about 0.625 inches or less when milling a segment or portion of a profile on a rail.
According to various embodiments, the thickness of cutting inserts may beneficially increase the operational life of the cutting inserts. For example, because the wear land will increase dramatically as the cutting edge in one area progresses down the length of the cutting insert, increasing a thickness of the cutting inserts may allow further utilization all cutting edges.
In various embodiments, a milling cutter may be configured to enhance cutting insert life in railway rail re-profiling applications. For example, whereas a cutting insert comprising an insert edge having a linear, e.g., wiper, portion extending a first distance to an angled portion may lose operational life once the linear portion has worn away, a cutting insert comprising a more sweeping radii or an insert edge having a linear portion extending a second distance, greater than the first, may result in additional insert life. That is, when the linear portion is worn in one area of the cutting insert edge, the actual cutting edge may move to a fresh area of the Insert. In one embodiment, dimensions of a cutting insert may comprise a width of 0.375 inches, a thickness of 0.25 inches, and length of 0.75 inches. Where the cutting edged is located along the length of the insert, increasing the length of the insert from 0.75 inches to 1.125 inches or more may provide additional cutting insert life. For example, the cutting edge may comprise an actual cutting edge. The actual cutting edge may progressively move along the edge as it wears. In one embodiment, a cutting edge of one or more of the cutting inserts may comprise an actual cutting edge. The actual cutting edge may, in some instances, may transition along the cutting edge from a first position to a second position when the first position wears, thereby increasing cutting insert life.
Those having ordinary skill in the art, on considering the present description of certain embodiments, will appreciate that the particular desired dimensions of a cutting insert may depend on the desired application, such as the shape, form, location, or environment of a railway rail. Therefore, unless stated otherwise, the above dimensions are merely examples of cutting insert dimensions.
As described above, in various embodiments, the milling cutter may be positioned in an offset configuration with respect to the rail. For example, 3 to 4.5 inches may separate the rotation axis of the milling cutter from the work performed along a rail. In various non-limiting embodiments, and using a 10 inch milling cutter as a scalable reference, milling cutters may be positioned at an offset of between 3.5 inches and 4.0 inches, or may be positioned at an offset of about 3.75 inches. In certain embodiments, the milling cutter may be positioned in an offset orientation comprising a distance between 35% and 40% of the milling cutter diameter. As also described above, in various embodiments, a plurality of milling cutters may be positioned to simultaneously and/or sequentially mill a rail profile. In one embodiment, the milling cutters may define cutting angles between 0° and about 55° about the rail profile.
According to various embodiments, cutting inserts may be supplied with various edge preparations. For example, edge preparations may include 0.002-0.003 inch hone only and a 0.015-0.020 inch×20° negative land with a 0.002-0.003 inch hone. In certain embodiments, reducing the rotational speed of the milling cutter may significantly increase insert life. In one embodiment, the rotational speed of the milling cutter may be reduced and the feed rate or speed of traverse may be increased to increase cutting insert life.
It will be appreciated that while the present disclosure may provide exemplary milling cutter bodies defining 32 cutting insert positions, it is contemplated that milling cutters equipped to accept more than or less than 32 cutting inserts may be used with the methods and apparatuses of the present disclosure. For example, the number of cutting inserts that may be mounted on a face milling cutter is generally determined by the circumference of the peripheral portion of the cutter body defining the insert positions and/or the size of the cutting inserts. In various non-limiting embodiments, the diameter of the milling cutter may be between 8 inches and 16 inches, or between 10 inches and 12 inches. In some embodiments, milling cutters comprising diameters less than 10 inches, such as 4 inches, may be used alone or in combination with other milling cutters comprising diameters that may be less than, greater than, or equal to the milling cutter comprising less than a 10-inch diameter. It is contemplated that reduced diameter milling cutter configurations may be beneficial for milling of difficult to reach segments of rail profile, such as rail at transitions, platforms, or grade crossings. It is also contemplated that milling cutters comprising diameters greater than 10 inches may be used alone or in combination with other milling cutters comprising diameters less than, greater than, or equal to the milling cutter comprising greater than a 10 inch diameter. It is contemplated that increased diameter milling cutters may be used to increase speed or operational life of various sets of cutting inserts. For example, longer insert life spans may increase productivity and shorten rail outage periods due to re-profiling because maintenance personnel will not be required to interrupt the re-profiling process to index or replace cutting inserts as frequently.
In the present description of embodiments, other than in the operating examples or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities or characteristics of elements, products, processing or test conditions or parameters, and the like are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, any numerical parameters set forth in the following description are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties one seeks to obtain in the apparatuses and methods according to the present disclosure. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
This disclosure describes various elements, features, aspects, and advantages of various embodiments of rail re-profiling apparatus and methods, systems, and methods thereof. It is to be understood that certain descriptions of the various embodiments have been simplified to illustrate only those elements, features and aspects that are relevant to a more clear understanding of the disclosed embodiments, while eliminating, for purposes of brevity or clarity, other elements, features and aspects. Any references to “various embodiments,” “certain embodiments,” “some embodiments,” “one embodiment,” or “an embodiment” generally means that a particular element, feature, and/or aspect described in the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The phrases “in various embodiments,” “in certain embodiments,” in “some embodiments,” “in one embodiment,” or “in an embodiment” may not refer to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the phrases “in one such embodiment” or “in certain such embodiments,” while generally referring to and elaborating upon a preceding embodiment, is not intended to suggest that the elements, features, and aspects of the embodiment introduced by the phrase are limited to the preceding embodiment; rather, the phrase is provided to assist the reader in understanding the various elements, features, and aspects disclosed herein and it is to be understood that those having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that such elements, features, and aspects presented in the introduced embodiment may be applied in combination with other various combinations and sub-combinations of the elements, features, and aspects presented in the disclosed embodiments.
Although the foregoing description has necessarily presented only a limited number of embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the relevant are will appreciate that various changes in the apparatuses and methods and other details of the examples that have been described and illustrated herein may be made by those skilled in the art, and all such modifications will remain within the principle and scope of the present disclosure as expressed herein and in the appended claims. For example, although the present disclosure has necessarily only presented a limited number of embodiments of rail re-profiling apparatuses and methods, it will be understood that the present disclosure and associated claims are not so limited. Those having ordinary skill will readily identify additional rail re-profiling apparatuses and methods and may design and build and use additional rail re-profiling apparatuses and methods along the lines and within the spirit of the necessarily limited number of embodiments discussed herein. It is understood, therefore, that the present invention is not limited to the particular embodiments or methods disclosed or incorporated herein, but is intended to cover modifications that are within the principle and scope of the invention, as defined by the claims. It will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments and methods discussed herein without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1887424 | Perazzoli | Nov 1932 | A |
2690610 | Begle et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
3116538 | Severson | Jan 1964 | A |
3344496 | Patkay | Oct 1967 | A |
3699843 | Sweeny | Oct 1972 | A |
4295764 | Theurer et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4372714 | Theurer | Feb 1983 | A |
4507897 | Vieau et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4534689 | Theurer | Aug 1985 | A |
4583893 | Line | Apr 1986 | A |
4584798 | Rivoire | Apr 1986 | A |
4622781 | Vieau et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4693039 | Vieau et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4732515 | Pomikacsek | Mar 1988 | A |
4843765 | Panetti | Jul 1989 | A |
4862647 | Vieau | Sep 1989 | A |
4878318 | Panetti | Nov 1989 | A |
5067283 | Pomikacsek | Nov 1991 | A |
5111624 | Shoenhair et al. | May 1992 | A |
5140776 | Isdahl et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145295 | Satran | Sep 1992 | A |
5265379 | Panetti | Nov 1993 | A |
5716167 | Siddle | Feb 1998 | A |
6033166 | Hampel | Mar 2000 | A |
6033291 | Mathison et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6139410 | Okumura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6719616 | Mathison et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746307 | Knoll et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789983 | Mizutani | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6921319 | Knoll et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6981907 | Korinek et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7156723 | Natarajan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7390150 | Kocherovsky et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8262323 | Satran et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8556545 | Chen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8985914 | Jansson | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20120288342 | Rungger | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130189045 | Behrens | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20160130768 | Hughes et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2515678 | Jan 1976 | DE |
3222208 | Dec 1983 | DE |
0668398 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1820902 | Aug 2007 | EP |
931267 | Jul 1963 | GB |
2121710 | Jan 1984 | GB |
WO 9520071 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO 2014152094 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Johnson et al., “Powder Power”, Cutting Tool Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2008, vol. 60, No. 2. |
Machine Translation of WO 95/20071, which WO '071 was published Jul. 1995. |
Greenleaf Carbide Insert Grade Description, Greenleaf Corporation,18695 Greenleaf Drive, Saegertown, PA 16433, http://www.greenleafglobalsupport.com/wcsstore/Greenleaf/upload/docs/CarbideGrades.pdf, Jun. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
Alpha Rail Team—Your Specialist for Rail Milling, Reprofiling and grinding of the rail profile in a single pass, http://www.vossloh-rail-services.com/media/downloads/pdfs/prospekte/13—Mobile—Milling—by—VRS.pdf, Sep. 2010, 4 pages. |
Railgrinder, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgrinder, Feb. 28, 2013, 1 page. |
Corrugation.Eu: Research and Facts, http://www.corrugation.eu/research/, Mar. 26, 2013, 4 pages. |
Technical Data—Milling 101, Greenleaf Corporation, 18695 Greenleaf Drive, Saegertown, PA 16433, http://www.greenleafglobalsupport.com/wcsstore/Greenleaf/upload/docs/MAppData.pdf, Mar. 26, 2013, M58-M63. |
Mobile Milling, Vossloh Rail Services, http://www.vossloh-rail-services.com/en/products—services/mobile—milling/mobile—milling.html, accessed Jun. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
Rail milling machine RFP 1, Enormous performance for the future!, European Railway Review, http://www.mfl.at/ENG/giessen/content.php?we—objectID=1535&navP=04&navID1=02&navID2=02&navID3=-&n=1, Jun. 2010, 1 page. |
Rail Milling for Underground, http://www.railwaypeople.com/rail-news-articles/rail-milling-for-underground-1686.html, Mar. 27, 2009, 1 page. |
Porr-Alpine Austriarail commissions the first rail milling train in Austria, Global cutting technology for mobile rail machining, http://www.alpine.at/en/presseinformation/porr-alpine-austriarail-stellt-den-ersten-schienenfraszug/, Nov. 3, 2008, 2 pages. |
Milling—the new dimension of rail-profiling, European Railway Review, Issue 3 2008, May 28, 2008, 1 page. |
Milling Machine That Sets World Record With Longest X-Axis, Qimtek, http://www.qimtek.co.uk/News/milling—machine—that—sets—world—record—with—longest—x-axis-784.html, May 12, 2008, 2 pages. |
Milling (machining), Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milling—%28machining%29, Mar. 23, 2013, 14 pages. |
MFL Maschinenfabrik Liezen Presents the Milling Train RFP 1, MFL Maschinenfabrik Liezen, http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/track/maschinenfabrik/press1.html, Jan. 18, 2011, 2 pages. |
Rail Milling Machines, Rail Sawing and Drilling Equipment, Rail Production Lines, MFL Maschinenfabrik Liezen, www.railway-technology.com/contractors/track/maschinenfabrik/, printed Jun. 2, 2011, 3 pages. |
Abbott, J., “Grinding and milling are essential to rail quality”, European Railway Review, Russell Publishing Ltd., Berkshire, United Kingdom, 2009, 1 page (abstract only). |
First ever rail-mounted milling machine trials on UK railway, Rail Technology Magazine, Jul. 6, 2009, 4 pages. |
Rail treatment: Rail milling, Schweerbau GmbH, http://www.schweerbau.de/en/pages/rail02.html, printed Jun. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
Rail Technology: Rail milling train SF02T-FS, http://www.linsinger.com/en/products/rail-technology/rail-milling-train/2-19-22.htm, Mar. 26, 2013, 1 page. |
Rail milling train SF03-FFS, Linsinger Maschinenbau Austria, http://www.linsinger.com/en/products/rail-technology/rail-milling-train/2-20-23.htm, printed Jun. 10, 2016, 2 pages. |
Rail milling train SF06-FFS Plus, Linsinger Maschinenbau Austria, http://www.linsinger.com/en/products/rail-technology/rail-milling-train/2-21-24.htm, printed Jun. 10, 2016, 2 pages. |
Rail milling train MG31, Linsinger Maschinenbau Austria, http://www.linsinger.com/en/products/rail-technology/rail-milling-train-mg31/schienenfraeszug—mg31/2-31-37.htm, printed Jun. 10, 2016, 1 page. |
MFL Sawing and milling technology download, Jun. 8, 2012, 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140271012 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |