The present invention relates generally to circuits for railroads, and more specifically to using detected railroad track circuit measurements to calculate train metrics.
Interpretation Considerations
This section describes the technical field in more detail, and discusses problems encountered in the technical field. This section does not describe prior art as defined for purposes of anticipation or obviousness under 35 U.S.C. section 102 or 35 U.S.C. section 103. Thus, nothing stated in the Problem Statement is to be construed as prior art.
Discussion
Track circuits for railroads allows engineers to predict train arrival times. A track circuit typically has power applied to each rail, and a relay coil wired across the rails conveys a current between the rails. When no train is on the track, the current flowing from the power source through the rails energizes the relay. When a train is on the track, its axles short (also called “shunt”) the rails together. This causes the current to the track relay coil to drop and de-energize. Circuits through the relay contacts therefore report whether or not the track is occupied.
Each circuit detects a defined section of track, such as a block or zone, for example. These sections are typically separated by insulated joints, which are usually present in both rails. To prevent one circuit from falsely powering another in the event of insulation failure, the electrical polarity is usually reversed from section to section. Circuits are usually powered at low voltages (1.5 to 12 V DC) to protect against line power failures. Preferably, relays and the power supply are attached to opposite ends of a section to prevent broken rails from electrically isolating part of the track. Often, a series resistor is used to limit the current when the track circuit is short-circuited.
Audio signals are also used for track circuits. For example, coded signals between 2970 and 4950 hertz can be transmitted, and as a train or other vehicle approaches the Audio Frequency (AF) Receiver, rail-to-rail voltage decreases and rail-to-rail current increases, and the AF may increase or decrease depending on the travel of a train through the circuit. The for example, by calculating an average slope of the voltage and current curves, the vehicle speed can be estimated. What are needed are enhanced crossing warnings, decreased vehicle headway authority and other operational benefits from the data collected and computable from the track circuit. The present invention provides such devices, systems, and methods.
Various aspects of the invention, as well as an embodiment, are better understood by references to the following detailed description. The detailed description, given by way of examples and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
When reading this section (An Exemplary Embodiment of a Best Mode, which describes an exemplary embodiment of the best mode of the invention, hereinafter “exemplary embodiment”), one should keep in mind several points. First, the following exemplary embodiment is what the inventor believes to be the best mode for practicing the invention at the time this patent was filed. Thus, since one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize from the following exemplary embodiment that substantially equivalent structures or substantially equivalent acts may be used to achieve the same results in exactly the same way, or to achieve the same results in a not dissimilar way, the following exemplary embodiment should not be interpreted as limiting the invention to one embodiment.
Likewise, individual aspects (sometimes called species) of the invention are provided as examples, and, accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize from a following exemplary structure (or a following exemplary act) that a substantially equivalent structure or substantially equivalent act may be used to either achieve the same results in substantially the same way, or to achieve the same results in a not dissimilar way.
Accordingly, the discussion of a species (or a specific item) invokes the genus (the class of items) to which that species belongs as well as related species in that genus. Likewise, the recitation of a genus invokes the species known in the art. Furthermore, it is recognized that as technology develops, a number of additional alternatives to achieve an aspect of the invention may arise. Such advances are hereby incorporated within their respective genus, and should be recognized as being functionally equivalent or structurally equivalent to the aspect shown or described.
Second, the only essential aspects of the invention are identified by the claims. Thus, aspects of the invention, including elements, acts, functions, and relationships (shown or described) should not be interpreted as being essential unless they are explicitly described and identified as being essential. Third, a function or an act should be interpreted as incorporating all modes of doing that function or act, unless otherwise explicitly stated (for example, one recognizes that “tacking” may be done by nailing, stapling, gluing, hot gunning, riveting, etc., and so a use of the word tacking invokes stapling, gluing, etc., and all other modes of that word and similar words, such as “attaching”).
Fourth, unless explicitly stated otherwise, conjunctive words (such as “or”, “and”, “including”, or “comprising” for example) should be interpreted in the inclusive, not the exclusive, sense. Fifth, the words “means” and “step” are provided to facilitate the reader's understanding of the invention and do not mean “means” or “step” as defined in § 112, paragraph 6 of 35 U.S.C., unless used as “means for—functioning—” or “step for—functioning—” in the Claims section. Sixth, the invention is also described in view of the Festo decisions, and, in that regard, the claims and the invention incorporate equivalents known, unknown, foreseeable, and unforeseeable. Seventh, the language and each word used in the invention should be given the ordinary interpretation of the language and the word, unless indicated otherwise. As will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, various structures and devices are depicted in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention.
It should be noted in the following discussion that acts with like names are performed in like manners, unless otherwise stated. Of course, the foregoing discussions and definitions are provided for clarification purposes and are not limiting. Words and phrases are to be given their ordinary plain meaning unless indicated otherwise.
The invention utilizes, in one embodiment, a sharp edge of detection associated with detected rail currents to provide a reliable detection zone for a track circuit. In addition, it offers the computation of train speed, velocity, and expected arrival time at a stationary target (such as a crossing gate) and a moving target (such as a train or car).
On a second track section 250 a first B-Point Coupler 260, and a second B-Point Coupler 262 which is a 2-Receiver B-Point Coupler 262 are illustrated between a first AF Transmitter 270 and a second AF Transmitter 272. A third B-Point Coupler 280 is illustrated approaching the transmitters 270, 272 (in order), while a fourth B-Point Coupler 282 is illustrated approaching the transmitters 272, 270 (in order). Areas of different shading define different track sections or zones.
Motion Detection Using B-Point Couplers to Detect Rail Currents:
In a similar application to the previous figure, the analog current levels of the outer B-Point Couplers are measured and tracked to detect trends. The slope of the increasing current curve indicates motion of a train moving towards the crossing (as different from leaving the crossing). These levels provide direction information as well as a level of movement on the rails that can be measured to provide different system responses for different approach speeds. In a motion detection application, the simple detection of motion towards the crossing invokes the warning system.
Constant Warning Time and Speed Prediction:
This information can also be used with a little more processing power to measure the slope of the current curve in real-time, providing a measurement of speed of an approaching train with an approximate distance from the crossing. This added information provides adequate data for Constant Warning Time which can provide a consistent warning time despite widely varying train speeds. Constant Warning Time activation for grade crossing warnings will activate the crossing, for example, from a fast moving train at a farther distance from the crossing while slower trains moving towards the crossing will activate the warning when the train is closer to the crossing. The result is a constant, or at least more consistent warning time such that traffic on the highway is not delayed more or less for trains traveling at different speeds.
Performance Specification—B-Point Couplers: Models BPC-SI1
Model BPC-SI1 provides high-resolution shunt detection capability with minimal interference from vehicle traction currents. Rail currents are detected using phased, paired coils that detect circulating track circuit currents while rejecting common mode propulsion currents.
The BPC-SI1 is provided complete with paired coils separated by 7-foot cable, and 25-foot pigtail for connection to a local junction box. Four rail clips are included with each unit (please specify rail gage with order). The BPC couplers are ideal for embedded rail applications where wire loops are not practical. One sensor of the pair mounts on each rail.
Though the invention has been described with respect to specific preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present application. Specifically, the invention may be altered in ways readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present disclosure. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims and their equivalents be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3576991 | Wilson | May 1971 | A |
4581700 | Farnham | Apr 1986 | A |
7254467 | Fries | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20030010872 | Lewin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20130270395 | Steffen, II | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012438 | Shoppa | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140319286 | Hogan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160096540 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |