The present invention relates to a railway rail pad.
Railway rail pads are provided between a foot of a railway rail and an underlying rail foundation, the pad having a rail seat portion for receiving the rail foot. Rail pads are typically made of resilient elastomeric material such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA). In a typical rail pad the rail seat portion is provided with a plurality of protrusions, such as studs or ribs, on one or both major faces. The design of the pad and the material used to make it are chosen so as to ensure that the pad has desired stiffness and wear characteristics, according to the requirements of the railway track in which it is to be used.
According to the present invention there is provided a railway rail pad for location between a foot of a railway rail and an underlying rail foundation, the pad having a rail seat portion for receiving a foot of a railway rail, two opposite edges of which rail seat portion extend parallel to the longitudinal axis of the rail when the pad is in use, which rail seat portion is provided with a plurality of studs on at least one major face thereof, wherein the studs are unevenly distributed across the said face of the rail seat portion such that the ratio of the area of said face occupied by said studs to the area of said face free of said studs is greater in an edge region of the rail seat portion than in a central region of the rail seat portion, said edge region being adjacent to one of said edges and said central region being adjacent to said edge region; wherein the studs are arranged in columns, extending substantially parallel to said opposite edges, each stud being of substantially the same size, and the number of studs in a column in the central region which is closest to said edge region being greater than in a column closer to the centre of the rail seat portion, and wherein the studs are also arranged in rows, extending substantially transverse to said opposite edges, wherein the ratio of protrusions to free area in a row of studs adjacent to, but spaced from, the centre of the rail seat portion is greater than that in a row further from the centre.
Such a pad may have reduced stiffness as compared to a conventional pad, in which the ratio is constant over substantially all of the rail seat region, whilst restricting rail roll and pad wear to an acceptable level, particularly in the edge region of the pad which is that part of the pad subject to the greatest loading and therefore most susceptible to wear.
Preferably the ratio is also greater in another edge region of the rail seat portion, adjacent to the other of the edges, than in the said central region.
In a preferred embodiment, the area of each of the studs is the same and the spacing between the studs varies.
The studs are preferably distributed symmetrically with respect to a first centre line of the rail seat portion extending parallel to the said longitudinal rail axis. Desirably, the studs are also distributed symmetrically with respect to a second centre line of the rail seat portion extending perpendicular to the said longitudinal rail axis.
Reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As shown in
The rail seat portion 2 has two major faces 4A, 4B on each of which are formed a plurality of studs 5 of substantially circular cross-section and equal size. The studs 5 are distributed unevenly across each major face, in register with studs 5 on the other major face, such that the ratio of the area occupied by the studs 5 on the face of the rail seat portion 2 to the area of that face free of studs 5 is greater in edge regions 6a, 6b of the rail seat portion 2 than in a central region 7 of the rail seat portion 2, the edge regions 6a, 6b being adjacent respectively to the third and fourth edges 2c, 2d of the rail seat portion 2 and the central region 7 being adjacent to the edge regions 6a, 6b. The ratio decreases gradually across the rail seat region 2 from the edges 2c, 2d to the centre 2e of the rail seat region 2. In this way, the stiffness of the pad is reduced whilst restricting rail roll and pad wear to an acceptable level.
In this embodiment the desired ratio, and hence pad characteristics, is obtained by selecting the number and location of the studs 5 in the edge and central regions 6a, 6b, 7.
In particular, in the pad 1, the studs 5 are arranged in columns parallel to the edges 2c, 2d of the rail seat portion 2. There are 7 columns a1 to a7 parallel to the edges 2c, 2d. As shown in
The studs in columns a1 to a7 are also arranged in rows parallel to the edges 2a, 2b. There are 9 rows b1 to b9. As shown in
In total the pad 1 has 42 studs on each face 4A and 4B of the pad 1.
The pattern of studs 5 is such that they are arranged symmetrically with respect to the two centre lines CL1, CL2 of the rail seat portion 2. Column a4 lies on the centre line CL1 and row b5 lies on the centre line CL2.
In this way, the pad can be used correctly either way round on the rail foundation provided that the ears 3a to 3d are located on the clip anchoring shoulders. The pad 1 has a retention lip 8 between ears 3a and 3c along edge 2c and another retention lip 8 between ears 3b and 3d along edge 2d, to hold the pad down and make it captive in a rail fastening assembly. If these lips 8 were not required and were omitted, since the pattern of studs 5 on each major face 4A, 4B of the rail seat portion is the same, the pad could also be used either way up.
Another embodiment of the pad has additional studs 5 placed, for example, in column a4, at rows b2 and b8, and in columns a3 and a5, at row b5, to adjust the stiffness of the pad as required. Such a pad 1′ is shown in
Table 1 below shows the respective ratios of protrusions to free area for pads A, B, C and D of different sizes and having different numbers of studs.
The pad 1 shown in
In one embodiment of pad 1, having a rail seat portion 2 of thickness 5.3 mm in a part between studs 5 and of thickness 9 mm in a part having studs 5, the pad was made of EVA material of a grade having approximately 9% VA content. The dynamic stiffness of the pad was 193.8 kN/mm. Under a standard 3 million cycle inclined wear test the pad stiffened 16.8%. In comparison a softer pad, made of EVA material of a grade having approximately 14% VA content, and having 62 studs of the same size, had a dynamic stiffness of 196 kN/mm but stiffened in the wear test to a much larger degree, 27.8%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0719900.3 | Oct 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/003395 | 10/8/2008 | WO | 00 | 5/3/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/047493 | 4/16/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1750735 | Tupper | Mar 1930 | A |
3358927 | Hein et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
4618093 | Young et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4635846 | Todd | Jan 1987 | A |
4971247 | Harkus | Nov 1990 | A |
5203502 | Young | Apr 1993 | A |
5549245 | Kish | Aug 1996 | A |
5692677 | Duconseil | Dec 1997 | A |
5730357 | Besenschek et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6045052 | Besenschek | Apr 2000 | A |
6305613 | Igwemezie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6422479 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6471139 | Bruder et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6648238 | Larke | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7080791 | Geissele et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100837 | Young | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7261244 | Urmson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7374109 | Ellerhorst | May 2008 | B2 |
7648080 | Hohne et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7717352 | Loffelsend et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20040113133 | Geissele et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155117 | Urmson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060118649 | Urmson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090108086 | Mospan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090261177 | Hamilton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100206958 | Cox et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 210 741 | Feb 1973 | DE |
296 08 777 | Aug 1996 | DE |
1204262 | Jan 1960 | FR |
2 435 285 | Aug 2007 | GB |
7 238502 | Feb 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100206958 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |