The purpose of a railroad tie is to connect the earth, or other intermediate supporting base, to plates which connect to rails. They also provide for the proper spacing (gauge) between rails. In turn the rails support locomotives, passenger, freight or service cars as they transit or park.
Railroad ties are traditionally made of wood, though some are of concrete or all-plastic or plastic-composite. There are several standard sizes, one common size being seven inches tall by nine inches wide by nine feet long. Other standards include cross sections of 6″×8″, 6″×9″ and lengths of 8′-0″ and 8′-6″.
Ties must be strong enough to maintain support and gauge under lateral loads, static vertical loads, and dynamic vertical loads. The tie must be resistant to the dynamic load which can cause the tie plate to move and abrade the tie. The tie must be able to function despite environmental stresses of thermal expansion, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, attack from microorganisms, fungi, insects and other life forms. It is highly preferable that ties be installable using the existing base of standardized installation equipment and fasteners. Some rail systems use a “third rail” to conduct power to trains. For this and other reasons, railroad ties should not be conductors of electricity.
The predominant tie in service is a hardwood timber treated with creosote, coal tar, chromated copper arsenate or other preservative. Over time these preservatives leach from the tie to the surrounding earth and eventually migrate to the surrounding areas, including water tables. There are few safe methods for disposing of treated timber ties. Stacking them in landfills does little to retard leaching. Open air burning releases the toxins into the atmosphere. Closed effluent burning with contaminant capture is expensive.
Because concrete and reinforced concrete ties are highly inflexible they do not allow a flex-and-resume support of the rails. More concrete ties are required per mile of track which increases the cost per mile. The cost per tie is also higher. Further, the increased weight of concrete requires changes to installation equipment and procedures.
Both timber and concrete ties can accept water into cracks or grain separations. As water freezes it expands and can force the cracks wider, leading to a reduction in tie strength. For reinforced concrete ties this crack expansion can also expose the metallic reinforcing material to air, thereby initiating the deleterious effects of rust, further reducing tie strength.
More than ten million ties were installed as new or replacements during each of 2003-2006. With thousands of ties per mile, the introduction of a functionally equivalent or superior, longer lived, and lower life cycle cost tie is materially beneficial to rail operators, maintains or improves rail system safety, and is ecologically beneficial.
Thus, there is a need for a tie with a combination of lower manufacturing times, better spike retention, increased resistance to abrasion, lighter weight, and lower cost than existing concrete, plastic or composite ties.
There is a further need for processes for manufacturing a tie having the above characteristics in an efficient and environmentally sensitive manner.
A railroad tie according to embodiments of the present invention uses a wood, composite wood, wood-plastic or engineered plastic core and is encapsulated in one to many layers of plastic, or plastic-composite materials. A complete encapsulation is also referred to as a sleeve or a jacket. Only the outer-most encapsulating layer is exposed to the elements. A single plastic layer is, or multiple layers are, applied in a high pressure mold to promote adhesion between the core and adjacent plastic layer as well as between layers to increase strength. High pressure also helps the plastic or plastic-composite material to displace voids in the core with the result being a stronger and longer lasting product than natural wood could provide.
The core may be an old tie removed from service, but is still adequately strong. It may be trimmed to size and encapsulated. The encapsulation retards leaching of preservatives in the core.
Alternatively, the core may start as an unusable treated timber tie rendered into fibers. Rotten or otherwise undesirable fibers are separated from reusable fibers and disposed of. The reusable fibers may be mixed with a binder and formed into cores of the appropriate size. Again, the encapsulation retards leaching of any fiber-borne preservative to the environment.
The core may be an engineered wood, structured wood, wood by-product, plastic/wood beam or plastic composite.
The encapsulation may be an engineered plastic or plastic-composite section.
The top side of the outermost encapsulation may be textured or pigmented to reduce glare or provide another aesthetically pleasing or functional appearance. The underside may be patterned to increase friction with ballast or other bed material, so as to retard lateral movement. The encapsulation(s) may be colored for an aesthetic or functional purpose. Other functional or decorative moldings may be added. These include, but are not limited to, owner identification, date of manufacturing, location of manufacturing facility, mold number, lot number etc.
Aspects, features, benefits and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will be apparent with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
The cores 60 and 100 may be new treated timber ties reduced to the 6.5″×8.5″ and 6″×8″, respectively. Because the cores 60 and 100 are encapsulated by the sleeve 50 and sleeves 80 and 90, respectively, the preservative in the cores 60 and 100 is retarded from leaching into the surrounding environment. Further, the cores 60 and 100 are protected from the elements. Alternatively, the cores 60 and 100 may be used treated timber ties that are structurally sound, but worn towards the outer edges. The outer edges are removed in sufficient quantity to result in the cores 60 and 100 shown in
The cores 60 and 100 may alternatively be constructed from used timber ties that are no longer structurally sound, but contain sound fibers and strands.
The sleeves 50, 80 and 90 may be constructed from any number of non-plastic polymers, plastics or plastic-composites. Preferably, inner sleeve 80 is constructed from a polyester, such as poly ethylene terephthalate, or PET. The PET may be additionally be mixed with a fine rubber, such as a rubber dust, and a stabilizer. Rubber dust performs two functions. First, one of the elements in rubber dust is carbon black, which assists in adding UV resistance to the sleeves. Second, the rubber dust consumes volume and is cheaper than plastic, i.e., a filler. The stabilizer may be, for instance, FUSABOND co-polymer, manufactured by DuPont. The stabilizer may improve the compatibility between the base plastic, such as PET, and any additives, fillers, or reinforcing agents, such as the rubber dust. Sleeves 50 and 90 are preferably constructed from a polyolefin such as high density poly ethylene, or HDPE. The HDPE may be mixed with a fine rubber dust and a stabilizer, as discussed above with respect to PET. As sleeves 50 and 90 are externally visible, a colorant may be added to the HDPE to attain the desired color. Additional additives, such as scents, may be added to the HDPE. Inner sleeve 80 and outer sleeve 90 are preferably greater than 75%, by weight, of PET and HDPE, respectively.
Although not shown in
The side surfaces of railroad ties 40 and 70 are preferably smooth to reduce friction during material handing.
The upper surface railroad ties 40 and 70 may be patterned in either a decorative or functional pattern. Such functional patterns include, but are not limited to, those patterns resulting in increased friction or glare reduction.
The bottom surface of the railroad ties 40 and 70 is preferably patterned depending on the surface upon which the railroad ties 40 and 70 are intended to be placed. For instance, the railroad ties 40 and 70 may be placed in ballast, requiring one type of patterning, or on a smooth surface such as those found in smooth floored tunnels, requiring different patterning.
For ties that are to be placed on ballast, the tread patterns should capture the ballast material (e.g., gravel rock) to increase friction. In
The bearing surfaces of ties according to an embodiment of the present invention having a patterned bottom surface may range in width from near-zero for a knife edge to two inches (2″) wide. The molding draft angle of the raised tread to the relieved section may range between 0.01-degrees (near vertical) to 89.99-degrees (near flat).
Not all ties are placed in ballast. To improve performance in tunnels, or other smooth bottomed surfaces,
Hereinafter, a preferred method of manufacturing the tie shown in
A mold is formed in the desired shape of the final product. If two layers of sleeves are desired, two molds may be necessary. Alternatively, molds are available that may reconfigure themselves, allowing both layers to be formed in a single mold. The core 100 may be suspended in the mold in various ways, such as by a rod. The hole in the sleeves resulting therefrom may be filled in at a later time.
The 4.5″×7″ core 100 is placed in the mold. Then, the PET injection molding machine supplies the PET mixture into the mold to form the inner sleeve 90. After the inner sleeve 90 is formed, the HDPE injection molding machine supplies the HDPE mixture in the mold to form the outer sleeve 80. Alternatively, if a single mold is used for both layers, PET is first injected, then allowed to cool. Then, the mold may be reconfigured, and the HDPE may be injected into the mold.
In a preferred embodiment and referring to
In an alternate embodiment, rather than obtaining PET and HDPE regrind, PET and HDPE recyclate may instead be obtained. Recyclate refers to plastic feed stock that has been sorted by type but requires further processing to remove contaminants, such as labels and traces of previous contents, and grinding before being ready for use. Before being introduced to the respective mixers and if the PET or HDPE recyclate is obtained in baled form, the PET or HDPE bales are placed in a debaler, wherein the bales of PET or HDPE recylate are broken apart into a more manageable stream of recyclate. PET or HDPE recyclate from the debaler is then forwarded to a shredder, wherein the large pieces of PET or HDPE recylate are reduced into smaller shreds of plastic. The shreds of PET or HDPE are then forwarded to a separator, which separates the PET or HDPE from non-plastic elements such as labels. The non-plastic elements may be removed to a closed effluent furnace where they can be burned as fuel to generate some electricity. The separated shreds of PET or HDPE may used identically to the PET or HDPE regrind above.
In another embodiment, old and scrap ties may be recycled to obtain new cores 100. First, remaining metal, such as plates and spikes, are removed from the old and/or scrap ties. The ties are then rendered into fibers and strands which are sorted. Rotten, overly short, or otherwise undesirable fibers may be disposed of by sending them to a closed effluent furnace to be burned to generate electricity. The remaining fibers may then be mixed with a binder such as, for instance, an iso-cyanate resin, heated and pressed to form a large sheet or billet. The large sheet or billet may then be processed to create ready-to-use cores of a desired size, which may be used identically to the 4.5″×7″ cores 100 in the process described above. The core 100 produced by the this method is greater than 80% wood fibers, by weight.
In another embodiment, scrap tires may be recycled to obtain rubber dust. Scrap tires may first be subject to a gross shred which turns the tires into crumbs. At this stage, the tire crumbs still contain metal fibers, such as remnants of steel belting and valves, and the rubber in the tire crumbs is vulcanized. Tire crumbs may be used as fuel in a closed effluent furnace. Alternatively, the tire crumbs may be finely shredded to de-vulcanize the rubber. The resulting finely shredded rubber dust may be used instead of the virgin rubber dust in the process described above. The shredding process also separates the metal from the shredded rubber dust. The metal may then be sold to a recycler.
While we have shown illustrative embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention may be embodied still otherwise without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention. For instance, although the exemplary embodiments disclosed above have been generally limited to the traditional rectangular-shaped tie, non-rectangular embodiments also lie within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1418708 | Hardman | Jun 1922 | A |
1463979 | Stubbs | Aug 1923 | A |
2157456 | Koyemann | May 1939 | A |
2490548 | Schultz | Dec 1949 | A |
2963294 | Buck | Dec 1960 | A |
3939617 | Eisses | Feb 1976 | A |
4079889 | Halpenny | Mar 1978 | A |
4083491 | Hill | Apr 1978 | A |
4105159 | Brown | Aug 1978 | A |
4108377 | Potter | Aug 1978 | A |
4134546 | Dankert | Jan 1979 | A |
4151145 | Emig et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4202494 | Rumell | May 1980 | A |
4204660 | Feuillade | May 1980 | A |
4236670 | Limmergard et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4265400 | Jordon | May 1981 | A |
4416419 | Ohno | Nov 1983 | A |
4438028 | Schmittmann et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4449666 | Hales et al. | May 1984 | A |
4634049 | Steinfeld et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4652495 | Sato et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4715425 | Brosch | Dec 1987 | A |
4738878 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5043225 | Ostby et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5055350 | Neefe | Oct 1991 | A |
5170937 | Vanotti | Dec 1992 | A |
5230459 | Mueller et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5236711 | Ostby et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5314115 | Moucessian | May 1994 | A |
5353987 | Kusakabe et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5540382 | Scheller | Jul 1996 | A |
5609295 | Richards | Mar 1997 | A |
5713517 | Loison | Feb 1998 | A |
5713518 | Fox et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722589 | Richards | Mar 1998 | A |
5799870 | Bayer | Sep 1998 | A |
5826791 | Broughton | Oct 1998 | A |
5886078 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916932 | Nosker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6021958 | Smith | Feb 2000 | A |
6059199 | Eriksson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070806 | Barbakadze et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6191228 | Nosker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237856 | Bachmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247651 | Marinelli | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6503193 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6708896 | Robinson | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6749103 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766963 | Hansen | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6828372 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7011253 | Nosker et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7138437 | Giorgini et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147169 | Walsh | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156319 | Kowalski | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7220458 | Hollis et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020062545 | Niedermair | May 2002 | A1 |
20050106406 | Curtis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060246265 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070187522 | Kirchmer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080032046 | Sporn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080179418 | Brough et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 440 597 | Aug 1991 | EP |
2 030 200 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2 087 320 | May 1982 | GB |
9720108 | Jun 1997 | WO |
2007009362 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080265047 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |