The benefits under 35 U.S.C. §§119(e), 120, 121 of the following are hereby claimed: U.S. application Ser. No. 14/171,700, filed on Feb. 3, 2014, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/678,203, filed on Nov. 15, 2012, the complete contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to railway vehicle couplers and more particularly to an improved coupler that is lighter in weight.
2. Brief Description of the Related Art
Railway couplers, particularly those utilized for railway freight cars or vehicle have a coupler body which is an integral casting of a coupler head and a shank. The head of the shank may be an AAR Standard Type “E” or “F” Coupler Head. The head also carries a knuckle and includes a lock, a thrower, a pivot pin and an articulated lock assembly. The coupler is made from a casting formed from low alloy steel. Although there are AAR standards for couplers, the length of the shank from the butt end of the coupler to the location where the shank joins the head may vary. The coupler is designed to be installed on a draft yoke of a railway vehicle. The butt end of the coupler shank is a spherical surface and bears against the face of the front follower of the yoke. The coupler is pivotally mounted on a yoke with a pin that joins the coupler to the vehicle's draft yoke.
Railcar couplers are disposed at each end of a railway car to enable joining one end of such railway car to an adjacently disposed end of another railway car. Couplers generally carry a knuckle which is pivotally mounted on the coupler head and is designed to engage with another knuckle carried on an adjacent coupler or another car. Examples of railway freight car coupler knuckles are taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,024,958; 4,206,849; 4,605,133; and 5,582,307.
Typically, couplers are heavy shafts that extend from each rail car. Generally, each coupler is engaged with a yoke housing a shock-absorbing element referred to as the draft gear. The type-E coupler is the standard coupler for railway freight cars. The type-E coupler has standard specifications such that producers making a type-E coupler adhere to a standard specification, so that the standard railway car couplers are completely interchangeable, regardless of the manufacturer. In addition, adherence to a standard also enables couplers from any one manufacturer to be able to be readily joined to couplers from any other domestic manufacturer. The Association of American Railroads (“AAR”) has adopted standards for railway couplers. The coupler must include specific geometry and dimensions that allow it to receive a knuckle, and the geometry must be such that the knuckle is allowed to freely operate when coupling and uncoupling railway cars. These dimensions and features of the coupler may be checked for compliance with AAR standards by using gauges, which are applied to the coupler to verify the coupler dimensions or parameters are within an allowable variation or tolerance range.
Couplers have a particular life, and in instances may fail. In many cases when a railcar coupler fails, a replacement coupler must be carried from the locomotive at least some of the length of the train, which may be up to 25, 50 or even 100 railroad cars in length. The repair of a failed coupler can be labor intensive, can sometimes take place in very inclement weather and can cause train delays.
According to a preferred embodiment, an improved railway vehicle coupler is provided.
In accordance with a particular embodiment, a railcar coupler includes a coupler head portion extending from a shank portion. The coupler head portion is configured to couple to a first coupler knuckle for coupling the railcar coupler to a second railcar coupler of an adjacent railcar. The coupler head portion comprises a nose portion and a gathering face extending from the nose portion for engaging a second coupler knuckle coupled to the second railcar coupler. The coupler head portion also comprises a guard arm portion extending from the nose portion.
According to preferred embodiments, the coupler has one or more zones of weight reduction. Preferred embodiments may include one or more zones of weight reduction in the shank of the coupler.
According to some preferred embodiments, the coupler has one or more weight reduction zones provided in the front or head of the coupler, which may include a cavity formed in the front face of the coupler, bores provided in the front face of the coupler head, and one or more cavities provided in the guard arm.
According to some preferred embodiments, weight reduction zones are provided in the head portion and shank portion of the coupler.
According to a preferred embodiment, the zones of weight reduction also may be constructed to include strengthening structures such as ribs or walls that are arranged to facilitate the handling of forceloads through the coupler structure.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved coupler for a railway vehicle.
It is an object of the invention to provide a coupler that is lightweight and suitably strong to handle forces and loads imparted on the coupler when in use installed on a railway vehicle.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method for producing couplers constructed to meet standard specifications as set forth by the Mechanical Committee of Standard Coupler Manufacturers and/or the AAR.
According to one preferred method, the coupler is produced by sand casting with the use of cores to provide the cavities in the casting. Although the coupler may be produced by casting, the coupler also may be produced according to a preferred method disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/273,140, filed on May 8, 2014, for a method for producing a coupler and an improved coupler, the complete contents of which are incorporated by reference.
According to a preferred embodiment, a lightweight coupler is provided which is constructed from a material that is stronger than grade E cast steel. Is a further object to accomplish the above objects by providing a coupler that is constructed from a material that is at least as strong, or even stronger, than grade E cast steel but which is lighter in weight than grade E cast steel.
It is another object of the invention to accomplish the above objects by providing a coupler with an interior and/or exterior geometry that has one or more arrangements, including preferred arrangements, of cavities and ribs, or combinations thereof.
According to some preferred embodiments, it is another object to provide a coupler having a maximum wall thickness of the shank and butt walls, which may include walls defining cavities, which are preferably less than about 1.6″ and more preferably less than about 1.15″, and where the coupler also is constructed from a material that is lighter and of similar, or greater, strength than grade E cast steel.
It is an object of the invention to provide a coupler that is constructed from an austempered ductile metal. In a preferred embodiment, the austempered metal is austempered ductile iron (ADI). In another preferred embodiment the austempered metal is austempered steel, such as austempered alloy steel, and, according to other embodiments, the coupler may be constructed from an austempered metal alloy.
It is another object of the invention to produce a coupler that may be constructed using less material for the final coupler product, thereby conserving material.
The lightweight couplers according to the invention may be used with standard knuckles or lightweight knuckles, including, such as, for example, the lightweight knuckles disclosed in our co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/171,719, filed on Feb. 3, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/171,700, filed on Feb. 3, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,229, filed on Mar. 15, 2013 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/678,021, filed Nov. 15, 2012, for a lightweight fatigue resistant knuckle, the complete contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Other technical advantages are provided to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions and claims. Moreover, while specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include all, some or none of the enumerated advantages.
Referring to
Coupler 210 is mounted within a yoke (not shown) secured at each end of a railway car center sill, such that, in accordance with a preferred mounting arrangement, the coupler 210 may extend outwardly under an end of a railway car to engage a similar coupler (or any compatibly connectible coupler) extending outwardly under an end of an adjacent railway car. Coupler 210 includes a shank 214 having a bore 271 which is adapted to connect to the yoke (not shown) on the end of a center sill of a railway vehicle. The generally V-shaped coupler head 213 is provided at a forward end extending from the shank 214. The shank 214 is adapted to be fitted within and attached to a yoke secured at each end of a center sill extending full length under the railway car at a longitudinal axis. The coupler head 213 is provided to receive a vertical-knuckle (not shown) rotatably pinned at an outer end of the coupler head 213 forming a first leg of the coupler head 213, while a second leg of the coupler head 213 comprises a fixed and rigid guard arm portion 216.
The coupler head 213 further includes pivot pin openings, including an upper pivot pin opening 223 and a lower pivot pin opening 224, and pivot lugs, including an upper pivot lug 225 and a lower pivot lug 226. The pivot pin openings 223,224 are provided to receive a knuckle pin (not shown) which is installed in the pivot pin openings 223,224 when a knuckle is seated at the pivot lugs 225,226. The pivot lugs 225,226 and pin, when installed, pivotally retain a knuckle on the coupler head. The coupler head 213 preferably is configured with the pivot lugs 225,226 aligned with the respective pivot openings 223,224. Referring to
The coupler 210 also is shown having a first angled gathering surface 218a provided on the gathering wall 218 of the coupler head 213. According to the preferred embodiment illustrated, the coupler 210 has a plurality of cavities. The coupler 210 is shown having a plurality of cavities provided in the guard arm 216. The coupler head 213, provided at the front of the coupler 210, is shown having a guard arm portion 216 with a first plurality of cavities provided in the guard arm, which include an upper cavity 227a and a lower cavity 229a. A plurality of openings preferably are provided in the head 213. Referring to
According to a preferred embodiment illustrated, the guard arm portion 216 of the coupler 213 extends from the coupler nose portion 233 to the rear of the coupler head 213 where the coupler head joins with the shank 214. The coupler head 213 joins with a shank 214. The coupler includes a front face 222 and has a cavity 239 that extends through the coupler head 213 and through the shank 214.
According to some embodiments, the construction is provided so that the slope and configuration of the guard arm portion 216 provide strength and stability to the coupler 210, and in particular the portion of the coupler 210 extending between the nose portion 233 and the shank 212.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the coupler 210 has a shank 214,214′ (shown in
Referring to
The shank 214 preferably is constructed having a rear weight reduction zone 280 provided at the rear of the coupler shank section 214. The weight reduction zone 280 preferably includes a plurality of cavities and ribs spacing apart the cavities. The cavities preferably may extend between the top and bottom of the shank, and, according to some embodiments, are formed between the top wall 261 and bottom wall 262. According to a preferred embodiment, the cavities provided in the shank 214 preferably are divided into an upper portion and a lower portion. According to a preferred arrangement, a mid wall portion 278 is provided between the shank rear wall 270 and the connecting wall 298 (
The improved coupler 210, according to a preferred embodiment, has an improved configuration for facilitating improved force handling. According to preferred embodiments, couplers according to the invention may be produced having a configuration for linearly managing load. The coupler 210 preferably manages the force transmissions in a linear or substantially linear direction through the length of the coupler.
According to a preferred embodiment, the mid wall 278 preferably may be provided at a height corresponding with the height of the mid wall 231 of the guard arm portion 216 of the coupler head 213. According to a preferred embodiment, the shank mid wall 278 and guard arm mid wall 231 may be disposed at substantially the same height so as to be located along a transverse plane taken through the coupler 210.
The coupler 210 includes a force handling structure, which preferably has one or more transverse layers, such as the wall or layer 231 that spans across the guard arm interior and separates the guard arm interior into cavities 227a,229a. The coupler 210 has a plurality of interior cavities, including the guard arm cavities 227a,229a, which are formed by the top and bottom walls 228,230 and mid wall 231. According to some embodiments, a plurality of bores 221 also are provided in the front face 222 of the head 213 (see
Referring to
Referring to
The coupler 210 preferably has shelves, including an upper shelf 211 and a lower shelf 212 that are provided on the head 213. Although the coupler is illustrated showing a preferred embodiment of a coupler 210 with a coupler head 213 and alternate shank options 214,214′,214″,314, alternate configurations for the upper shelf 211 and lower shelf 212 also may be provided.
The coupler 210 including using the configuration of the shank 214 and the preferred weight reduction zone 280 provided therein, preferably is lighter in weight, yet suitably strong to meet or exceed the AAR standards for railcar couplers. According to some embodiments, the coupler 210 may be constructed so that the walls have preferred thicknesses that will produce a coupler according to acceptable AAR standards. According to some preferred embodiments, the shank 214,214′,214″,314 may be constructed having maximum wall thicknesses of preferably less than about 1.6″ and, more preferably, if ADI is used to produce the coupler, less than about 1.15″ and preferably less than about 1.0″ and, more preferably less than about 0.65″ if austempered steel is used.
According to some embodiments, a further weight reduction zone is provided in the front of the coupler or in the coupler head 213, and includes a plurality of bores 221 formed in the front face 222 of the coupler head 213. Although the bores 221 are referenced in
According to one preferred embodiment, the coupler 210 preferably is formed by treating it with a treatment process, and preferably a process to strengthen the material, and to provide a suitable microstructure in the formed coupler which has improved resistance to fatigue and cracking, and which may be lighter as well. Preferably, the treatment process involves an austenitizing process, by which the formed coupler is an austempered material. For example, the forming of the coupler may involve applying a suitable austenitizing process. One preferred method involves heating the metal coupler, such as, for example a ductile iron coupler to an austenitizing temperature, and then quenching, such as in a salt bath or other heat extraction composition. The austenitizing process may be applied to the molded coupler (where the coupler is formed using by molding) or coupler casting (where the coupler is formed by casting), or a coupler produced using another process to form it. Alternatively, the coupler may be formed from steel or other suitable metal, including, for example, grade E steel traditionally used to form couplers.
Some other preferred examples of materials that may be used in accordance with the invention to form the coupler include austempered metal, such as, for example, austempered ductile iron, austempered steel and austempered alloy steel, as well as alloys of these materials. Austempered ductile iron may include ductile iron alloyed with one or more metals, such as, for example, nickel, molybdenum, manganese, copper and mixtures thereof.
According to some embodiments, couplers produced with the method of the present invention may be constructed having heights, lengths and widths similar to those of standard couplers, such as Type E and Type F couplers. According to some preferred embodiments, couplers may be constructed in accordance with the invention having preferred dimensions. The coupler has improved surface finishes to contribute to providing higher fatigue strength for the coupler. For example, the coupler may have a surface finish of about 125-175 RMS. According to some preferred embodiments, couplers may have wall thicknesses preferably less than about 1.6″ and, more preferably, if ADI is used to produce a coupler, less than about 1.15″ and preferably less than about 1.0″ and, more preferably less than about 0.65″ if austempered steel is used. In addition, according to some preferred embodiments, the couplers may be produced having some or all of the advantages discussed herein and meet the AAR specification, M-216.
These and other advantages may be realized with the present invention. While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, the description is illustrative and is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
According to preferred embodiments of the invention, lightweight couplers may be constructed from grade E steel, such as for example, couplers configured with one or more weight reduction zones provided in the coupler head and/or coupler shank to reduce the weight of the coupler. According to other preferred embodiments, lightweight couplers, including the coupler 210, and, including, in addition thereto, couplers configured with a construction of one or more weight reduction zones may be constructed from an austempered metal, preferably austempered steel, austempered ductile iron, austempered steel alloy or austempered ductile iron alloy. Preferred compositions, such as steel, as well as alloy steel compositions, e.g., alloyed preferably with magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, copper or mixtures thereof, or more preferably, with chromium, nickel or mixtures thereof, (or mixtures of the preferred and more preferred metals), may be used to form the couplers as discussed and shown herein. The steel or preferred/more preferred alloy steel composition is austempered to obtain tensile strength, yield, and elongation properties for the inventive couplers which are suitable to meet or exceed the AAR standards for couplers, including the current standard set forth by the American Association of Railroads (AAR) in AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, such as current standard M-211, M-205, M-220 NDT and Rule 88 of the AAR Office Manual, the complete contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. Couplers may be constructed from ductile iron that is austempered. The ductile iron also may be used in alloy form, preferably, with nickel, molybdenum, manganese, copper, or mixtures thereof, to form couplers.
Lightweight couplers may be produced using the improved coupler configurations disclosed and shown herein. In addition, lightweight couplers are constructed from austempered ductile iron, austempered ductile iron alloy, austempered steel, and/or austempered steel alloy, in accordance with the invention, to provide couplers that are lighter in weight than prior couplers yet possesses suitable strength, yield and fatigue resistant properties that meet or exceed AAR testing and standards requirements set forth by the American Association of Railroads (AAR) in AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, and in Rules of the AAR Office Manual, the compete contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
It is intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that it is the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the spirit and scope of this invention. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention described herein and as defined by the appended claims. Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations and modifications may be ascertained by those skilled in the art and it is intended that the present invention encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations and modifications as falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
461312 | Brown | Oct 1891 | A |
533985 | Brown | Feb 1895 | A |
693998 | Brown | Feb 1902 | A |
2088135 | Johnson | Jul 1937 | A |
2562504 | Metzger | Jul 1951 | A |
2689051 | Kayler | Sep 1954 | A |
3604569 | Kulieke | Sep 1971 | A |
3670901 | Metzger | Jun 1972 | A |
3722708 | Ion et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3779397 | De Penti | Dec 1973 | A |
3854599 | Day et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3856156 | Metzger | Dec 1974 | A |
4081082 | Scherrer | Mar 1978 | A |
4090615 | Martin | May 1978 | A |
4206849 | Kaim | Jun 1980 | A |
4537304 | Kaim et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4591059 | Hammarlund | May 1986 | A |
4605133 | Altherr | Aug 1986 | A |
4645085 | Hanula et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
5096076 | Elliott et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5320229 | Mautino et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5511676 | Holmes | Apr 1996 | A |
5582307 | Hawthorne | Dec 1996 | A |
5878897 | Lazzaro | Mar 1999 | A |
5900082 | Hewitt | May 1999 | A |
5954212 | Beatty et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6129227 | Openchowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155442 | Wurzer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6796448 | Wilt et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7302994 | Mautino et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7337826 | Mautino et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7757871 | Mautino et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8056741 | Mautino et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8196762 | Smerecky | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201613 | Marchese et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8297455 | Smyth | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8381923 | Smyth | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8408406 | Smerecky et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8485371 | Nibouar et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8544662 | Smerecky et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8662327 | Nibouar | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20040173555 | Wilt et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20080128377 | Mautino et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090289024 | Nibouar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100326943 | Mautino et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024379 | Ely | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110068077 | Smyth | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110163059 | Gagliardino et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110168655 | Nibouar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120292279 | Wilt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130042785 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140076193 | Brook et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Brandenberg, Kristin; “Successfully Machining Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI)”; Applied Process Inc. Technologies Div.—Livonia, Michigan, USA; Oct. 2001. |
A. Kahn and B.K. Chen, “Evaluation of Grade 1 Austempered Ductile Iron for Application to Rail Cast Components”, Proceedings of the Fifth Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference 2004. |
Luís Magalhães, Jorge Seabra, “Teeth Surface Failures in Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) Gears”, Gears and Transmission Workshop, Paper No. XIII, pp. 269-286, Faculdade de Engen-haria da Universidade do Porto, Portugal, Jun. 5, 2003. |
Stokes, B. et al.; “Effects of Carbides on Fatigue Characteristics of Austempered Ductile Iron”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 36 (2005) 977-988. |
Bubenko et al.; “Fatigue Crack Propagation through Austempered Ductile Iron Microstructure”; Materials Engineering, vol. 17, 2010, No. 3, pp. 15-20. |
Bubenko et al.; “Fatigue Crack Propagation Within the Austempered Ductile Iron Microstructure”; Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, vol. 17, 2011, No. 1, pp. 18-25. |
Dundar, Sacit; “Application of Austempered Ductile Iron to Rail Wheel Sets”; Journal of Engineering Sciences 2003, 9 (3), pp. 283-287. |
International ADI and Simulation Conference; May 28-30, 1997. |
Knuckles, Types E and F—Fatigue Test, AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices Castings, 2009, [M-216] 1-2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140360963 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14171700 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14273285 | US | |
Parent | 13678203 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14171700 | US |