Railway vehicle derailment detection method and device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10654496
  • Patent Number
    10,654,496
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 22, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 19, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A transmission line 5 configured to be broken when it comes into contact with a rail 4 is installed on a disengagement prevention guide 1 attached to an axle box 3 of a railway vehicle. One end 5a and the other end 5b of the transmission line 5 are connected to a determination unit 6 to monitor continuity of the transmission line 5. In the event of a derailment, the determination unit 6 determines that a derailment has occurred when the disengagement prevention guide 1 makes contact with the rail 4 and the transmission line 5 breaks, thereby interrupting the continuity of the transmission line 5. This arrangement allows an accurate detection of a derailment, so as to prevent a railway vehicle from traveling when its wheels have become disengaged from a rail without an operator being aware of it, thus improving safety after the derailment occurs.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a derailment detection method and device of a railway vehicle (referred to below simply as a “vehicle”).


BACKGROUND ART

When a vehicle derails, the wheels disengage from the rails, and if an operator is unaware of the derailment, the vehicle continues traveling, resulting in greater damage due to the derailment. Therefore, early detection of derailment and stopping of the vehicle would result in improved safety after derailment occurs.


Various technologies relating to derailment detection were proposed in the past. One of them is a device that uses sensors to measure physical quantities such as acceleration and angular velocity that are applied to the vehicle body, and if signals extracted from the measured values exceed a threshold value, the device determines that a derailment has occurred (e.g., Patent Reference 1-3).


However, in cases where a derailment is detected on the basis of threshold values, differences in the accuracy of derailment detection can occur, depending on the threshold value settings. Thus, there is a problem in that the accuracy of derailment detection can be poor if the threshold values are not set at an optimal value.


In Patent Reference 4, as shown in FIG. 4 (a), there is disclosed a system for restricting the lateral movement of a bogie, provided with a ground-based equipment 11 (referred to below as a “derailment prevention guard”) on an inner side of a pair of rails 4 and a stopper 14 that protrudes downward to the inner side portion of a wheel 13 of a bogie 12. As shown in FIG. 4 (b), in the event of a derailment, this system for restricting the lateral movement of a bogie restricts the movement of the bogie 12 in a lateral direction of the vehicle by having a contact portion 14a of the stopper 14 make contact with an inner side surface of the derailment prevention guard 11.


In Patent Reference 5, as shown in FIG. 5, there is disclosed a derailment and disengagement prevention system, provided with a stopper unit 16 at a lower portion of an axle box 17. In the event that a wheel 13 disengages from a rail 4, this derailment and disengagement prevention system moves a vehicle in a lateral direction of the vehicle, and a sloping member 16a formed on a stopper member 16 makes contact with the rail 4, so that the wheel 13 is positioned outside of the prescribed range of a fastening device 15 of the rail 4.


In Patent Reference 6 there is disclosed a fall prevention device provided with a stopper device 18 disposed at a lower portion of an axle box 17, as shown in FIG. 6. If a derailment occurs, this fall prevention device guides a vehicle so that it travels on a track bed to prevent the vehicle from falling, by causing a stopper piece 18a provided in a stopper device 18 to make contact with a side surface of a rail 4.


However, none of the systems disclosed in Patent References 4-6 detect a derailment. Therefore, it is incumbent on an operator to stop a vehicle after a derailment, but the probability is not zero that the vehicle will continue traveling while the wheels have disengaged from the rails, if the operator is unaware that a derailment has occurred.


On the other hand, in Patent Reference 7 there is disclosed a technology that provides a connecting device for producing electrical signals, and if the connecting device is disconnected, a command is delivered to an alarm device. This technology is provided instead of a vertical displacement detector provided parallel to an axle damper disposed between an axle box support unit and a bogie frame.


However, in the technology disclosed in Patent Reference 7, there are cases in which the connecting device does not become disconnected if a derailment occurs, depending on the durability of the connecting device and the performance of the axle damper. In such cases, a derailment cannot be detected.


In Patent Reference 8, there is disclosed a system for detecting a derailment, wherein a case is immobilized by a portion of a rotating bearing that rotatably supports an axle, and within this case is installed a vibration detector. Detection of a derailment results when a connecting support that connects a base of the vibration detector to a weight part is broken.


However, in the case of the system disclosed in Patent Reference 8, it is difficult to decide on a material, surface area, and shape of the connecting support such that only the connecting support reliably breaks if a derailment occurs. In other words, it is not necessarily the case that it is possible to reliably detect a derailment using the system disclosed in Patent Reference 8.


In Patent Reference 9, there is disclosed a technology for detecting derailment and falling of a railroad vehicle, wherein optical fiber is laid along the outer side of a pair of rails, and detection of derailment and falling of the railroad vehicle occurs when the optical fiber is cut.


However, in the technology disclosed in Patent Reference 9, there are cases in which the fall prevention device disclosed in Patent Reference 6 is installed, and there are cases in which the optical fiber does not break just because of a railway vehicle derailment, due to the position in which the optical fiber is laid. In addition, this technology cannot be considered to be practical, since the optical fiber must be laid along the entire length of track.


PRIOR ART REFERENCES
Patent References



  • Patent Reference 1: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2002-211396

  • Patent Reference 2: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2002-211400

  • Patent Reference 3: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2004-175156

  • Patent Reference 4: Japanese Patent No. 5430216

  • Patent Reference 5: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2006-315518

  • Patent Reference 6: Japanese Patent No. 3393032

  • Patent Reference 7: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2002-79941

  • Patent Reference 8: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. 2009-255823

  • Patent Reference 9: Japanese Patent Application Kokai Publication No. H11-14838



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention

A problem that the present invention aims to solve is that derailment detection accuracy becomes poor if derailment detection depends on a determination of a derailment based on a threshold value, and if the set threshold value is not optimal. Another problem that the present invention aims to solve is that, even if the systems disclosed in Patent References 4-6 are installed, there is a possibility that a vehicle will continue to travel even if the wheels have disengaged from the rails, if the operator is unaware that a derailment has occurred. Yet another problem that the present invention aims to solve is that a derailment cannot necessarily be reliably detected using the technologies disclosed in Patent References 7-9.


Means for Solving these Problems

The object of the present invention is to detect derailments more accurately, without variations in derailment detection accuracy that depend on the threshold values that are set, and without a vehicle continuing to travel with the wheels disengaged from the rails, because an operator is unaware that a derailment has occurred.


In order to achieve this object, the railway vehicle derailment detection method according to the present invention employs a member disposed at a position on a vehicle that makes contact with a rail or a ground-based equipment installed on an inner side of a pair of rails, and that breaks due to contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment in the event of a derailment, determining that a derailment has occurred by detecting that the member has been broken due to contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment.


The method according to the present invention is implemented by employing a derailment detection device of the present invention comprising:

    • a member that is installed in a portion of a railway vehicle, the member configured to be broken when a portion of the railway vehicle comes in contact with a rail or a ground-based equipment installed on an inner side of a pair of rails, and
    • a device that determines that a derailment has occurred by detecting that the member has been broken when the portion of the railway vehicle comes in contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment.


In detail, an example of a portion of the vehicle that makes contact with the rail in the event of a derailment is a disengagement prevention guide attached to an axle box provided with a bearing that rotatably supports a wheel set or attached to a bogie. Examples of the member configured to be broken due to contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment installed on the inner side of a pair of rails include a transmission line installed at a contact surface of the disengagement prevention guide that makes contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment, a conductive coating applied on top of an insulating coating, a power supply line for transmitting brake signals to all of the constituent railway vehicles, a wiring of a detector for measuring vibration and/or temperature of the axle box. A vibration accelerometer or a temperature sensor may be used as a sensor for detecting that the member has been broken.


Advantageous Effects of the Invention

The present invention makes it possible to more accurately detect a derailment without making use of a threshold value, but rather, detects a derailment by utilizing a member configured to be broken by making contact with a rail, when a portion of a railway vehicle makes contact with a rail, for example, when a derailment occurs. Therefore, safety is improved after the derailment, because the vehicle does not continue traveling after the wheels have disengaged from the rail if an operator is unaware of the derailment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a drawing illustrating the main parts of the derailment detection device according to the present invention. FIG. 1 (a) is a plan view; FIG. 1 (b) is a front view; and FIG. 1 (c) is a right side view.



FIG. 2 is a drawing illustrating a state in which a disengagement prevention guide that forms the derailment detection device according to the present invention makes contact with a rail during a derailment.



FIG. 3 is a drawing illustrating the derailment detection device according to the present invention that adds the technical ideas of the present invention to the disengagement prevention guide disclosed in Patent Reference 5. FIG. 3 (a) illustrates a time of ordinary travel; FIG. 3 (b) illustrates a time when a derailment has occurred.



FIG. 4 is a drawing illustrating the system for restricting the lateral movement of a bogie disclosed in Patent Reference 4. FIG. 4 (a) illustrates a time of ordinary travel; FIG. 4 (b) illustrates a time when a derailment has occurred.



FIG. 5 is a drawing illustrating the derailment and disengagement prevention system disclosed in Patent Reference 5, at a time when a derailment has occurred.



FIG. 6 is a drawing illustrating the railway vehicle fall prevention device disclosed in Patent Reference 6, at a time when a derailment has occurred.





EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

The object of the present invention, which is to detect derailments more accurately, is achieved by detecting that a member has been broken due to contact with a rail or with the ground-based equipment, when a portion of the railway vehicle makes contact with the rail or with the ground-based equipment on an inner side of a pair of rails when a derailment has occurred.


Example

In the following, an example of the present invention is described, making reference to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, after describing the process from conception of the invention to solving the problems of the prior art.


Recently, there are cases in which an L-shaped disengagement prevention guide 1 is installed in an axle box 3 of a high-speed train such as a bullet train, with the purpose of preventing a significant disengagement of a wheel from a rail during a derailment. The axle box 3 employs an internally mounted bearing to rotatably support a wheel set having a wheel 2.


The disengagement prevention guide 1 uses one plate 1a attached to a lower surface of the axle box 3 to cause another plate 1b to be lowered vertically so that a rail 4 comes to be located between the wheel 2 and the disengagement prevention guide 1, as viewed from the front side of the vehicle.


In the case of a vehicle equipped with this disengagement prevention guide 1, if the vehicle derails and the wheel disengages from the rail 4, the vehicle undergoes no further displacement in the lateral direction of the vehicle, after the other plate 1b of the disengagement prevention guide 1 abuts the rail 4, as shown in FIG. 2.


That is to say, if the vehicle derails and the wheel disengages from the rail 4, the disengagement prevention guide 1 abuts the rail 4 when the vehicle becomes displaced in the lateral direction of the vehicle only by a predetermined distance.


Accordingly, the present inventors had the idea that it is possible to detect a derailment if a member is installed in the disengagement prevention guide 1 that can be broken when it makes contact with the rail 4, and if the breaking of the member can be detected.


The present invention is based on the above-described idea of the inventors. As shown in FIG. 1, for example, in the event of a derailment, at the position where the disengagement prevention guide 1 abuts the rail 4, there is provided a transmission line 5 on a side facing the rail 4 and extending from the one plate 1a to the other plate 1b of the disengagement prevention guide 1. In addition, one end 5a and the other end 5b of the transmission line 5 are connected to a determination unit 6, for example, to monitor continuity of the transmission line 5.


In the above-described configuration, when the disengagement prevention guide 1 abuts the rail 4 during a derailment, the transmission line 5 is cut, so the continuity of the transmission line 5 is interrupted. It is therefore possible to reliably detect derailments if the continuity of the transmission line 5 is monitored by using the two ends 5a and 5b of the transmission line.


After the determination unit 6 detects that the continuity of the transmission line 5 has been interrupted, thereby determining that a derailment has occurred, derailment data is transmitted to a control device on the derailed vehicle, using a wireless or wired transmission line. This causes the brakes to be activated to stop the vehicle, thereby preventing the vehicle from traveling on the rail while the wheels are disengaged from the rail.


Instead of employing an indirect method for detecting derailments involving a comparison of threshold values that are set in advance with signals extracted from physical quantities such as acceleration and angular velocity that are applied to the vehicle body, the present invention directly detects derailments by employing a physical phenomenon wherein the transmission line 5 is cut. This makes it possible to more accurately detect derailment of a railway vehicle.


The present invention is not limited to the above-described example, and the preferred embodiment may, of course, be advantageously modified within the scope of the technical ideas recited in the claims.


The above-described example employs the transmission line 5 as the member that is cut when the disengagement prevention guide 1 makes contact with the rail 4 during a derailment.


However, a power supply line for transmitting brake signals to all of the constituent railway vehicles may be used as the member that is cut in order to detect a derailment. In this case, it becomes possible to automatically apply brakes when the line is cut and derailment is detected.


In the case of a vehicle in which the vibration and/or temperature of the axle box 3 is measured, the wiring of this detector may be used as the member configured to be broken in the event of a derailment. In such cases, it is possible to constantly monitor whether or not there is an abnormality in the wiring, since vibration and temperature are measured during normal operation.


As long as it is possible to detect that breaking has occurred when the disengagement prevention guide 1 makes contact with the rail 4, a conductive coating that can peel when the disengagement prevention guide 1 makes contact with the rail 4 to interrupt conductive continuity may be applied on top of an insulating coating. A vibration accelerometer and/or a temperature sensor may be used as a sensor for detecting breaking of the member during a derailment.


The disengagement prevention guide 1 having a member configured to be broken during a derailment is not limited to the configuration shown in FIG. 1. It may have configuration that includes a stopper member of the type disclosed in Patent Reference 5, as shown in FIG. 3.


Instead of the disengagement prevention guide 1, it is possible to use a device that restricts the lateral movement of a bogie during a derailment by having a contact portion of a stopper make contact with an inner side surface of a ground-based equipment (derailment prevention guard) of the type disclosed in Patent Reference 4. In this case, the member that breaks during a derailment is disposed on the stopper side.


EXPLANATION OF THE REFERENCE SYMBOLS






    • 1 Disengagement prevention guide


    • 1
      a One plate


    • 1
      b Another plate


    • 2 Wheel


    • 3 Axle box


    • 4 Rail


    • 5 Transmission line


    • 6 Determination unit




Claims
  • 1. A railway vehicle derailment detection method for a railway vehicle traveling on a rail, comprising: installing a derailment detection member disposed at a position on the railway vehicle that makes contact with a rail or a ground-based equipment installed on an inner side of a pair of rails, and that breaks due to direct contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment in event of a derailment; anddetermining that a derailment has occurred by detecting that the derailment detection member has been broken due to direct contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment;wherein breaking of the derailment detection member prevents a railway vehicle from traveling when wheels of the railway vehicle become disengaged from the rail without knowledge of an operator of the railway vehicle.
  • 2. A railway vehicle derailment detection device for a railway vehicle traveling on a rail, comprising: a derailment detection member that is installed in a portion of the railway vehicle, the derailment detection member being configured to be broken when a portion of the railway vehicle comes in direct contact with a rail or a ground-based equipment installed on an inner side of a pair of rails; anda device that determines that a derailment has occurred by detecting that the derailment detection member has been broken when the portion of the railway vehicle comes in direct contact with the rail or the ground-based equipment;wherein breaking of the derailment detection member prevents a railway vehicle from traveling when wheels of the railway vehicle become disengaged from the rail without knowledge of an operator of the railway vehicle.
  • 3. The railway vehicle derailment detection device according to claim 2, wherein: the portion of the railway vehicle that makes contact with the rail in the event of a derailment comprises a disengagement prevention guide attached to an axle box provided with a bearing that supports a rotatable wheel set; andthe derailment detection member configured to be broken due to contact with the rail comprises one of (i) a transmission line installed on a surface of the disengagement prevention guide that makes contact with the rail, (ii) a conductive coating applied on top of an insulating coating, (iii) a power supply line for transmitting brake signals to all of the constituent railway vehicles, (iv) a wiring of a detector for measuring vibration and/or temperature of the axle box, (v) a vibration accelerometer, or (vi) a temperature sensor.
  • 4. The railway vehicle derailment detection device according to claim 2, wherein: the portion of the railway vehicle that makes contact with the ground-based equipment in the event of a derailment comprises a disengagement prevention guide attached to a bogie; andthe derailment detection member configured to be broken due to contact with the ground-based equipment comprises one of (i) a transmission line installed on a surface of the disengagement prevention guide that makes contact with the ground-based equipment, (ii) a conductive coating applied on top of an insulating coating, (iii) a power supply line for transmitting brake signals to all of the constituent railway vehicles, (iv) a wiring of a detector for measuring vibration and/or temperature of the axle box, (v) a vibration accelerometer, or (vi) a temperature sensor.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2016-048067 Mar 2016 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2017/006542 2/22/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/154573 9/14/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3998413 Mygatt Dec 1976 A
4286763 Hayden Sep 1981 A
5188038 Shanley Feb 1993 A
5492290 Quinn Feb 1996 A
6412332 Bartonek Jul 2002 B1
7577502 Henry Aug 2009 B1
8013550 Young Sep 2011 B1
20030236598 Villarreal Antelo Dec 2003 A1
20040138814 Rajaram Jul 2004 A1
20050251337 Rajaram Nov 2005 A1
20110004446 Dorn Jan 2011 A1
20130015298 Cooper Jan 2013 A1
20140110537 Bartonek Apr 2014 A1
20140118152 Bartonek May 2014 A1
20150339863 Allwardt Nov 2015 A1
20190047597 Shimokawa Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
104428186 Mar 2015 CN
53-078717 Jun 1978 JP
11-014838 Jan 1999 JP
2002-079941 Mar 2002 JP
2002-211396 Jul 2002 JP
2002-211400 Jul 2002 JP
3393032 Apr 2003 JP
2004-175156 Jun 2004 JP
2006-315518 Nov 2006 JP
2008-201372 Sep 2008 JP
2009-255823 Nov 2009 JP
5430216 Feb 2014 JP
2014013650 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014013650 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2017154573 Sep 2017 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190047597 A1 Feb 2019 US