The present invention relates to rain gutters for buildings and the like, and in particular to a guard and associated method to prevent leaves, twigs and other debris from entering the interior of the gutter.
Gutter protection systems, such as guards, caps, screens and shields, are well known in the art, and are designed to prevent leaves and other debris from entering the trough-shaped interior of the gutter, while directing runoff water to a desired location. Some types of gutter guards, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,182,399 and 5,845,435, are incorporated into a complete gutter system of the type having a special gutter shape. Consequently, such guards cannot be used to retrofit an existing conventional gutter.
Some types of gutter guards, such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0073631 A1, attach to the existing hangers of a conventional gutter, while others, such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0069594 A1, employ special clips to attach the guard to the front lip of an existing gutter. In both such designs, extra strain is applied to the gutter and/or associated hangers as a result of the weight of the guard, as well as the runoff water and related debris. This additional weight can result in substantial problems, particularly when the existing gutter is installed without anticipating the additional weight of a retrofitted guard.
Many types of gutter guards are currently available, including those that use screens or expanded metal panels, as well as those using imperforate caps or top sheets. Typically, both of these designs rely upon the rain gutter itself for support, and/or must be fastened to the roof, resulting in increased installation difficulty and cost.
One aspect of the present invention is to provide a guard for rain gutters and the like of the type having a generally trough-shaped interior, a rear wall extending along a roof fascia, and a front lip with a channel and an end flange. The guard includes a cap having a rearward portion shaped to extend along an associated roof, a medial portion shaped to extend over the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion shaped to extend adjacent to the front lip of the gutter. The guard also includes a mounting bracket having a rearward portion adapted for abutment with the rear wall of the gutter, an upper portion supporting the cap to deflect debris from the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion having a hook-shaped nose configured for insertion under the end flange of the gutter, such that the mounting bracket is rotated rearwardly along a generally vertical arc about the nose toward the rear wall of the gutter, and shifted laterally into a skewed orientation within the interior of the gutter, and subsequently pivoted laterally along a generally horizontal plane about the nose into a generally perpendicular orientation within the interior of the gutter to retain the nose in the channel of the gutter, and facilitate attachment of the rear portion of the mounting bracket to the rear wall of the gutter and the roof fascia.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a mounting bracket for rain gutter guards of the type having a deflector extending over a gutter with a generally trough-shaped interior, a rear wall extending along a roof fascia, and a front lip with a channel and an end flange. The mounting bracket includes a rearward portion adapted for abutment with the rear wall of the gutter, an upper portion shaped for supporting the deflector to deflect debris from the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion having a hook-shaped nose configured for insertion under the end edge of the gutter, such that the mounting bracket is rotated rearwardly along a generally vertical arc about the nose toward the rear wall of the gutter, and shifted laterally into a skewed orientation within the interior of the gutter to positively capture the nose in the channel of the gutter, and subsequently pivoted laterally along a generally horizontal plane about the nose into a generally perpendicular orientation within the interior of the gutter to retain the nose in the channel of the gutter, and facilitate attachment of the rearward portion of the mounting bracket to the rear wall of the gutter and the roof fascia.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is to provide a guard for rain gutters and the like of the type having a generally trough-shaped interior, a rear wall extending along a roof fascia, and a front lip with a channel and an end flange. The guard includes an imperforate cap having a rearward portion shaped to extend along an associated roof, a medial portion shaped to extend over the interior of the gutter, and a curved forward portion shaped to extend above and forward of the front lip of the gutter to define a gap of predetermined width through which rainwater is swept into the interior of the gutter. The guard also includes a mounting bracket having a rearward portion thereof adapted for abutment with the rear wall of the gutter, an upper portion thereof supporting the cap to deflect debris from the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion thereof having a hook-shaped nose configured for insertion under the end flange of the gutter such that the mounting bracket assumes a generally perpendicular orientation within the interior of the gutter to retain the nose in the channel of the gutter, and acilitate attachment of the rearward portion of the mounting bracket to the rear wall of the gutter and the roof fascia, so as to precisely maintain the predetermined width of the gap during use.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for deflecting debris and the like from rain gutters of the type having a generally trough-shaped interior, a rear wall extending along a roof fascia, and a front lip with a channel and an end flange. The method comprises providing a cap having a rearward portion shaped to extend along an associated roof, a medial portion shaped to extend over the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion shaped to extend adjacent to the front lip of the gutter. A mounting bracket is provided having a rearward portion shaped for abutment with the rear wall of the gutter, an upper portion shaped to support the cap to deflect debris from the interior of the gutter, and a forward portion having a hook-shaped nose. The method further includes inserting the nose of the mounting bracket under the end edge of the gutter, and rotating the mounting bracket rearwardly and laterally along a generally vertical arc about the nose toward the rear wall of the gutter into a skewed orientation within the interior of the gutter. The mounting bracket is then pivoted along a generally horizontal plane about the nose into a generally perpendicular orientation within the interior of the gutter to retain the nose in the channel of the gutter. The rearward portion of the mounting bracket is then attached to the rear wall of the gutter and the roof fascia.
Yet another aspect of the present invention provides a self-supporting gutter guard that can be easily and quickly attached to an existing rain gutter. A unique mounting bracket shifts into the interior of the gutter in a quick and easy fashion, and includes self-leveling and aligning features which automatically locate the same properly within the gutter interior to ensure secure support and proper debris deflection. The mounting bracket is preferably configured to be mounted on the roof fascia by a single fastener to expedite installation.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the guard is anchored solely through the roof fascia, and does not penetrate or damage the roof shingles. Furthermore, when an imperforate cap type deflector is used, the unique mounting bracket precisely retains the cap in a predetermined edge forward relationship with the gutter that maintains a consistent gap which keeps out debris and animals, such as rodents, birds, etc., without restricting the flow of rainwater into the gutter. The mounting bracket has a very strong, rigid design to resist damage to the guard by tree branches and the like. Preferably, the cap has a very durable finish that can be matched to the appearance of the building.
The gutter guard is economical to manufacture, easy to install and repair, and can be readily retrofitted to an existing conventional gutter. The gutter guard is capable of a long operating life, and particularly well adapted for the proposed use.
These and other advantages of the invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following written specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper”, “lower”, “right”, “left”, “rear”, “front”, “vertical”, “horizontal” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
The reference numeral 1 (
In the illustrated example, guard 1 (
The illustrated guard 1 (
The illustrated existing gutter 2 is attached to building 32 in a conventional fashion, which as best illustrated in
With reference to
In the illustrated example, nose 14 (
The horizontal leg 50 (
Mounting bracket 9 (
With reference to
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, mounting bracket 9 may be used to support a wide variety of different types of gutter guards, including perforated styles, such as screens, expanded metal panels, etc., as well as imperforate styles, such as the illustrated nose forward design.
The illustrated guard 1 is preferably installed on gutter 2 in the following fashion. A plurality of mounting brackets 9 are selected for attachment to the roof fascia 5 in a laterally spaced apart relationship along the length of the gutter, generally in between the gutter hangers 45. In one working embodiment of gutter guard 1, mounting brackets 9 are spaced around 30 inches apart. Each of the mounting brackets 9 is attached to gutter 2 in the manner shown in
After mounting bracket 9 has been shifted into its proper perpendicular relationship within the interior 3 of gutter 2, the installer drives fastener 56 through the rear wall 4 of gutter 2 and into the roof fascia 5. Preferably, fastener 56 has a threaded shank and a sharpened point which forms its own aperture to avoid a separate drilling operation. A power drill or driver is preferably used to rotate fastener 56 into the secured position. In the example shown in
After each of the mounting brackets 9 have been installed in the manner described hereinabove, cap 12 is attached to the installed mounting brackets 9 in the following fashion. As best illustrated in
Guard 1 is self-supporting, and can be easily and quickly attached to an existing rain gutter 2. The unique mounting brackets 9 anchor the guard solely through the roof fascia 5, and do not penetrate or damage the roof shingles. Furthermore, the mounting brackets precisely retain the cap in a predetermined edge forward relationship with the gutter that maintains a consistent gap to keep out debris and animals, without restricting the flow of rainwater into the gutter.
In the foregoing description, it will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed herein. Such modifications are to be considered as included in the following claims, unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
The present application is a continuation of commonly assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/099,250, filed Apr. 5, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,347,027 entitled RAIN GUTTER GUARD AND METHOD, which is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/458,562 filed Jun. 10, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,993,870), which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and claim priority thereto under 35 U.S.C. § 120.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
546042 | Horn | Sep 1895 | A |
603611 | Nye | May 1898 | A |
836012 | Cassen | Nov 1906 | A |
891405 | Cassens | Jun 1908 | A |
891406 | Cassens | Jun 1908 | A |
1101047 | Yates | Jun 1914 | A |
2144663 | Petersen | Jan 1939 | A |
2209741 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 1940 | A |
2271081 | Layton | Jan 1942 | A |
2636458 | Harris | Apr 1953 | A |
2669950 | Bartholomew | Feb 1954 | A |
2672832 | Goetz | Mar 1954 | A |
2873700 | Heier | Feb 1959 | A |
2935954 | Matthews et al. | May 1960 | A |
3388555 | Foster | Jun 1968 | A |
3420378 | Turner | Jan 1969 | A |
3507396 | Homa | Apr 1970 | A |
3550381 | South | Dec 1970 | A |
3809347 | Pekarek | May 1974 | A |
3950951 | Zukauskas | Apr 1976 | A |
4043527 | Franzmeier | Aug 1977 | A |
4272370 | Cunning | Jun 1981 | A |
4404775 | Demartini | Sep 1983 | A |
4435925 | Jefferys | Mar 1984 | A |
4493588 | Duffy | Jan 1985 | A |
D277584 | Annestedt | Feb 1985 | S |
4497146 | Demartini | Feb 1985 | A |
4553356 | Pepper | Nov 1985 | A |
4616450 | Shouse | Oct 1986 | A |
4632342 | Skinner | Dec 1986 | A |
4757649 | Vahldieck | Jul 1988 | A |
4796390 | Demartini | Jan 1989 | A |
4929000 | Annestedt, Sr. | May 1990 | A |
5016404 | Briggs | May 1991 | A |
5040750 | Brant | Aug 1991 | A |
5072551 | Manoogian, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5181350 | Meckstroth | Jan 1993 | A |
5189849 | Collins | Mar 1993 | A |
5271191 | Vahamaki | Dec 1993 | A |
5305562 | Sapia | Apr 1994 | A |
5333417 | Demartini | Aug 1994 | A |
5368784 | Annestedt, Sr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375379 | Meckstroth | Dec 1994 | A |
5388377 | Faulkner | Feb 1995 | A |
5398464 | Jacobs | Mar 1995 | A |
5406755 | Serano | Apr 1995 | A |
5457916 | Tenute | Oct 1995 | A |
5459965 | Meckstroth | Oct 1995 | A |
5468026 | Annestedt | Nov 1995 | A |
5471798 | Kuhns | Dec 1995 | A |
5491998 | Hansen | Feb 1996 | A |
5495694 | Kuhns | Mar 1996 | A |
5548931 | Bryant | Aug 1996 | A |
5570860 | Schoenherr | Nov 1996 | A |
5575118 | Vahldieck | Nov 1996 | A |
5617678 | Morandin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638643 | Demartini et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640809 | Iannelli | Jun 1997 | A |
5640810 | Pietersen | Jun 1997 | A |
5737879 | Sweet | Apr 1998 | A |
5819476 | Annestedt, Sr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5845435 | Knudson | Dec 1998 | A |
5862631 | Attaway et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5878533 | Swanfeld, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893239 | Leahy | Apr 1999 | A |
5911659 | Serano | Jun 1999 | A |
6016631 | Lowrie, III | Jan 2000 | A |
6073398 | Williams | Jun 2000 | A |
6098345 | Demartini et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151836 | McGlothlin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151837 | Ealer, Sr. | Nov 2000 | A |
6182399 | Pollera | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6260307 | Richardson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269592 | Rutter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6367743 | Iannelli | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6412228 | Meckstroth | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453622 | Walters | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470628 | Walters | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6543729 | Ylonen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6631587 | Lynch | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6658796 | Higgins | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701674 | Albracht | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708452 | Tenute | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732477 | Richard | May 2004 | B1 |
6745517 | Vahldieck | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6993870 | McDonald et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20020069594 | Sweet | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073631 | Baker | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030009951 | Bergeron | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030089046 | Stevens | May 2003 | A1 |
20040000098 | Knudson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040244304 | Bullinger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2219018 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2-304168 | Dec 1990 | JP |
3-28448 | Feb 1991 | JP |
3-100254 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3-267449 | Nov 1991 | JP |
5-52009 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-222812 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-57894 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-93692 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6-146508 | May 1994 | JP |
6-193219 | Jul 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060272223 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11099250 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11505914 | US | |
Parent | 10458562 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11099250 | US |