The present invention generally relates to ranking search results according to relevance to a search request. More particularly, the present invention relates to ranking search results using feature extraction.
In the modern computing world, users routinely enter search requests into a variety of search engines for receiving help functionality, research materials, documents related to a given task, and the like. A well-known use of search engines in modern times is the use of a variety of search engines for obtaining one or more Universal Resource Locators (URL) associated with IInternet-based information. For example, a user may use a search engine to search the Internet for all topics related to a given history topic or other research topic.
In response to such searches, hundreds or even thousands of search results, including URLs, documents or other resources, may be located across vast arrays of information sources that are responsive to the user's search request. Efforts have been made for ranking the search results and providing the search results to the user in the order of relevance to the given search request. Prior methods have attempted to obtain various properties from located resources and for using those properties to determine a ranking of the relevance of individual resources to a user's request. Often, metadata associated with various resources, for example, documents and URLs, is incorrect or misleading. Incorrect data used by a ranking system leads to a poor ranking of the search results. Consequently, a user may be forced to review a number of irrelevant resources before the user comes to more relevant resources located during the search.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved method for ranking search results using a property extraction feature. It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
Embodiments of the present invention solve the above and other problems by providing a method of ranking search results using feature extraction data. According to an embodiment of the present invention, upon receipt of a search request by a search engine, a database of information, such as Internet-based information sites, is searched for information responsive to the search request. Each located document or other resource is parsed to obtain data, such as text, formatting information, metadata, and the like. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, text and data from the located documents or resources are passed through a feature extraction application to extract properties of the text or data that may be used to improve a ranking of the search results based on relevance of the search results to the user's request.
According to a particular embodiment, while a search engine may obtain certain types of information including document or resource titles from defined sources such as metadata, the feature extraction application extracts titles of each located document or resource from document or resource content based on formatting applied to the document or resource. Text, data, and extracted properties, such as resource titles and associated statistical information, are indexed. A ranking application is then run on the indexed text, data, and extracted properties for determining a ranking value for each located resource based on its relevance to the search request. The ranking application uses the extracted properties, such as titles, to augment other data passed to the ranking application, including indexed text, data from an associated document or resource. Ranked search results may then be displayed to the user.
These and other features and advantages, which characterize the present invention, will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and are explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed.
As briefly described above, embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and computer-readable media for ranking search results using feature extraction data. Each of the results of a search engine query is parsed to obtain data, such as text, formatting information, metadata, and the like. The text, the formatting information and the metadata are passed through a feature extraction application to extract data that may be used to improve a ranking of the search results based on relevance of the search results to the search engine query. According to one embodiment, the feature extraction application extracts titles from text and data contained in located documents or resources based on formatting properties applied to or associated with the document or resource. The extracted titles, the text, the formatting information and the metadata for any given search results item are processed according to a ranking algorithm application for determining a ranking of the given search results item. Ranked search results items may then be displayed according to ranking. These embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, and structural changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like elements through the several figures, aspects of the present invention and an exemplary operating environment will be described.
Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Turning now to
The mass storage device 14 is connected to the CPU 4 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the bus 12. The mass storage device 14 and its associated computer-readable media, provide non-volatile storage for the personal computer 2. Although the description of computer-readable media contained herein refers to a mass storage device, such as a hard disk or CD-ROM drive, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the personal computer 2.
By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
According to various embodiments of the invention, the personal computer 2 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a TCP/IP network 18, such as the Internet. The personal computer 2 may connect to the TCP/IP network 18 through a network interface unit 20 connected to the bus 12. It should be appreciated that the network interface unit 20 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computer systems. The personal computer 2 may also include an input/output controller 22 for receiving and processing input from a number of devices, including a keyboard or mouse (not shown). Similarly, an input/output controller 22 may provide output to a display screen, a printer, or other type of output device.
As mentioned briefly above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 of the personal computer 2, including an operating system 16 suitable for controlling the operation of a networked personal computer, such as the WINDOWS operating systems from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. The mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 may also store one or more application programs. In particular, the mass storage device 14 and RAM 8 may store an application program 105 for providing a variety of functionalities to a user. For instance, the application program 105 may comprise many types of programs such as a word processing application, a spreadsheet application, a desktop publishing application, and the like. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the application program 105 comprises a multiple functionality software application suite for providing functionality from a number of different software applications. Some of the individual program modules that may comprise the application suite 105 include a word processing application 125, a slide presentation application 135, a spreadsheet application 140 and a database application 145. An example of such a multiple functionality application suite 105 is OFFICE manufactured by Microsoft Corporation. Other software applications illustrated in
Referring now to
As should be understood by those skilled in the art, the example search request and search results illustrated in
Documents, URLs, and other resources searched by a search engine contain various information including text, data, and metadata. Metadata for a given resource may include such items as a title, an author's name, a date of resource creation, or information about an organization responsible for the resource. Utilizing terms and phrases parsed from a search request, a search engine locates matching terms or phrases in the text, data, or metadata of documents, resources, or URLs available in searched information sources or databases. A parser application 310 is illustrated for parsing each of a plurality of search results items into one or more portions of data and associated formatting information applied to the one or more portions of data, as well as, parsing the results of the search engine request into pieces of content and metadata. For example, parser application 310 may be in the form of a web crawler application and may parse an Internet-based resource into individual content pieces and metadata. For example, if the metadata of the resource includes a title, an author's name, identification information about the resource, and the like, the parser application 310 may parse that information into separate pieces of data or content. Content from other portions of a given resource may also be parsed by the web crawler application. For example, properties of a document may be obtained from parsing a storage file associated with a located search item, for example, a Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) header or body section. For a detailed discussion of the operation of a web crawling application, described herein, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/609,315, Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “Normalizing Document Metadata Using Directory Services,” which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out herein and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/493,748, filed Jan. 28, 2000, entitled “Adaptive Web Crawling Using A Statistical Model,” which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out herein.
In addition, other text and data in a given resource may be parsed into individual terms or phrases by the parser application. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, for other types of search engine results, other types of parsing applications may be utilized. For example, a document parser, for example an XML parser 130, may be utilized for parsing documents from a company or entity document storage site for individual text items, phrases, and metadata in the documents that may be useful for ranking search results obtained by the search engine.
Often, metadata of individual documents or other resources can be incorrect, missing or misleading. For example, information may be located in the metadata of a given Internet-based resource that is indicative of a title of a document, but the information may be incorrect. In addition, text or data located in the general content of the document may be ambiguous, misleading, or otherwise difficult to parse and to understand in terms of its relevance to a given search request. Referring still to
Other content, for example, text and data, may be passed to a content analysis application 340 for similar analysis. For example, a content analysis application 340 may be utilized for characterizing certain text or data for eventual use in ranking associated search results. For example, a content analysis application 340 may compare words parsed from the text of a document or resource against a database of known words that have been previously characterized. For example, referring to the example search results contained in
According to an embodiment of the present invention, content and metadata parsed from located documents, resources, and URLs are passed to a feature extraction application for extracting specified information from the located resources. According to a particular embodiment of the present invention, the feature extraction application 350 is utilized for extracting titles from located resources, documents, or URLs. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, a title of a given document, resource or URL, is a very valuable piece of information for ranking a given search result for its relevance to a search request. For example, referring to
According to embodiments of the present invention, an exemplary feature extraction application for extracting titles from located resources parses data contained in the resource for determining which text or data is associated with a title. For example, formatting information applied to certain text or data in a document, the location of certain text or data in a document, spacing between certain text or data a document, and the like, may be used by a feature extraction application for extracting a title from a given resource. For example, historical data may indicate that a phrase located at the top of a document or resource set apart from other content of the document or resource and formatted according to certain formatting properties, for example, bold formatting, underlining, and the like, may indicate that the phrase is a title. For another example, words or phrases located after certain introductory words, such as “Re:,” “Subject,” “Title,” and the like, may indicate that a word or set of words or data immediately following such terms or phrases is a title. According to embodiments of the present invention, such formatting information (font size, style, alignment, line numbers, etc) are passed to a classification algorithm of the extraction feature application that attempts to classify each fragment of text or data passed through the extraction feature as a potential beginning and ending of a particular feature such as a title. Once a beginning point and an ending point are determined as including a given feature, such as a title, a weighting may be applied to the determined text or data to further identify the determined text or data as a particular feature, such as a title. Once a given text or data fragment is determined as a particular feature, that text or data fragment may be indexed for ranking, as described below.
In addition to extracting titles from data passed through the feature extraction application, statistical information is extracted for each extracted title that provides a number of and frequency of appearance of a the extracted title in the data. As should be understood, other types of data in addition to titles may be extracted from a text or data selection for use in accordance with the present invention for augmenting the performance of a ranking application such as the field weighting algorithm described below.
Referring still to
Extracted titles and associated statistical information, words, phrases, data, and the like, indexed for a given search results item are passed to a field weighting application 380 for generation of a ranking value for the associated search results item based on its relevance to the search request. The following represents an example scoring or ranking algorithm for ranking a given search result based on indexed data obtained or extracted from a given search results item.
According to this algorithm, “Wtf” means weighted term frequency which is a sum of term frequencies of a given term multiplied by weights across all properties. According to embodiments, statistical analysis weighting may be applied to various terms for use in the algorithm. For example, articles like “and” and “the” may be given low weights so those terms will not adversely affect ranking of a given search item. “Wdl” means weighted document length. “Avwdl” means average weighted document length. “N” means number of documents in the corpus or body of documents or resources located in the search. The lower case “n” means the number of documents containing the given query term and the sum is across all query terms. The variables “kl” and “b” are constants. As should be understood, the ranking algorithm described above is one example of such and algorithm. For a detailed description of the operation of a field weighting ranking/scoring function, as described herein, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/804,326, filed Mar. 18, 2004, entitled “Field Weighting In Text Document Searching,” which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out herein.
Other suitable ranking algorithms may be used for generating ranking values for search results based on a content, metadata and extracted features of a given document or resource. For example, according to a particular embodiment, the algorithm cited above may be modified by removing the expression “(1−b)+b dl/avdl.” This expression is a length normalization factor that is incorporated into wtf variable. According to this embodiment, independent length normalization is used for each property. WTF becomes a weighted sum of term frequencies normalized by length. Extracted features (e.g., titles) and associated statistical information are included in the weighted sum of term frequencies, illustrated in the algorithm above, as one of the non-zero weight properties. The extracted titles and associated statistical information serve to augment the performance of the ranking algorithm for generating more accurate and reliable rankings for individual search results items. As should be understood, other types of data, in addition to titles, for example, names, dates, locations, and the like, may be extracted by a feature extraction application for augmenting the performance of the field weighting application. Once the field weighting ranking/scoring function is run using the indexed data obtained or extracted from an associated search results item, a numerical value is assigned to the associated search results item in terms of its relevance to the associated search request.
Referring still to
Having described components of a system for ranking search results using properties extracted by a feature extraction application with respect to
At block 415, documents or other resources obtained by the search engine are parsed to obtain text, data, formatting information, metadata, and the like. At block 420, text, content, metadata, and other data parsed from obtained documents or resources are passed to one or more analysis applications 340, 350, 360. In particular, according to embodiments of the present invention, a feature extraction application 350 is run against text, data, and metadata parsed from a given search results item to extract titles from the associated search request items. At block 425, extracted titles and other text, data and metadata are indexed in an index center 370, described above.
At block 430, in response to a search request, the search engine searches the index for information responsive to the request. Information responsive to the request, including extracted titles and other text, data and metadata, is passed to the ranking algorithm, as described above. At block 435, ranking values are generated by the ranking algorithm application for each search results item. At block 440, the results of the user's search request are displayed according to the ranking values applied to each search results item by the field weighting application. According to embodiments, the steps described above may be performed according to different orders. For example, according to one embodiment, the index is built for a variety of documents or resources in a given information source. Then, at query time, the search engine searches the index and ranks the results using the ranking algorithm.
As described herein, methods and systems are provided for ranking search results using feature extraction data. According to a particular embodiment, titles are extracted from documents, resources, URLs, and the like located by a search engine in response to a user search request. The extracted titles are utilized along with other metadata and information parsed from a given search request item by a field weighting application for applying a ranking to a given search request item. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5222236 | Potash et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5257577 | Clark | Nov 1993 | A |
5594660 | Sung et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606609 | Houser et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5848404 | Hafner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5893092 | Driscoll | Apr 1999 | A |
5920859 | Li | Jul 1999 | A |
5933851 | Kojima et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960383 | Fleischer | Sep 1999 | A |
5983216 | Kirsch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987457 | Ballard | Nov 1999 | A |
6006225 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012053 | Pant et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032196 | Monier | Feb 2000 | A |
6041323 | Kubota | Mar 2000 | A |
6070158 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070191 | Narendran et al. | May 2000 | A |
6098064 | Pirolli et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125361 | Chakrabarti et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128701 | Malcolm et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145003 | Sanu et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151624 | Teare et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167369 | Schulze | Dec 2000 | A |
6182085 | Eischstaedt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182113 | Narayanaswami | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185558 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202058 | Rose et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208988 | Schultz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216123 | Robertson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222559 | Asano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240407 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240408 | Kaufman | May 2001 | B1 |
6247013 | Morimoto | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263364 | Najork et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285367 | Abrams et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285999 | Page | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304864 | Liddy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317741 | Burrows | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327590 | Chidlovskii et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349308 | Whang et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351467 | Dillon | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351755 | Najork et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360215 | Judd et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6385602 | Tso et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389436 | Chakrabarti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418433 | Chakrabarti et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418452 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418453 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442606 | Subbaroyan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473752 | Fleming, III | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484204 | Rabinovich | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516312 | Kraft et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539376 | Sundaresan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546388 | Edlund et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547829 | Meyerzon et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549896 | Candan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549897 | Katariya et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594682 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598047 | Russell et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598051 | Wiener et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601075 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622140 | Kantrowitz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628304 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633867 | Kraft et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633868 | Min et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636853 | Stephens | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638314 | Meyerzon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671683 | Kanno | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6701318 | Fox et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718324 | Edlund et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718365 | Dutta | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738764 | Mao et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6763362 | McKeeth | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766316 | Caudill et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766422 | Beyda | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775659 | Clifton-Bligh | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775664 | Lang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778997 | Sundaresan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6829606 | Ripley | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859800 | Roche et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862710 | Marchisio | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871202 | Broder | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883135 | Obata et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886010 | Kostoff | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886129 | Raghavan et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6910029 | Sundaresan | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931397 | Sundaresan | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934714 | Meinig | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944609 | Witbrock | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947930 | Anick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959326 | Day et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973490 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990628 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7016540 | Gong et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7028029 | Kamvar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039234 | Geidl et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051023 | Kapur et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072888 | Perkins | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076483 | Preda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080073 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7107218 | Preston | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7152059 | Monteverde | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181438 | Szabo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179497 | Cossock | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243102 | Naam et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246128 | Jordahl | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257574 | Parikh | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257577 | Fagin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260573 | Jeh et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7281002 | Farrell | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308643 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7328401 | Obata et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7428530 | Ramarathnam et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7519529 | Horvitz | Apr 2009 | B1 |
20010042076 | Fukuda | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020055940 | Elkan | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062323 | Takatori et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078045 | Dutta | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099694 | Diamond et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103798 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107861 | Clendinning et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107886 | Gentner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129014 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169595 | Agichtein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169770 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030037074 | Dwork et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053084 | Geidl et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055810 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061201 | Grefenstette et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065706 | Smyth et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074368 | Schuetze et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030208482 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217007 | Fukushima et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217047 | Marchisio | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217052 | Rubenczyk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003028 | Emmett et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006559 | Gange et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049766 | Bloch et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093328 | Damle | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117351 | Challapalli et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148278 | Milo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181515 | Ullmann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186827 | Anick et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194099 | Lamping et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199497 | Timmons | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205497 | Alexander et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215606 | Cossock | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215664 | Hennings et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040254932 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033742 | Kamvar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044071 | Cho et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055340 | Dresden | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055347 | Cho et al. | Mar 2005 | A9 |
20050060186 | Blowers et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060304 | Parikh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060311 | Tong et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071328 | Lawrence | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071741 | Acharya et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086192 | Kodama | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086206 | Balasubramanian et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086583 | Obata et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050144162 | Liang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154746 | Liu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165781 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187965 | Abajian | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192936 | Meek et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192955 | Farrell | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210006 | Robertson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216533 | Berkhin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240580 | Zamir et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251499 | Huang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262050 | Fagin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283473 | Rousso et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036598 | Wu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047649 | Liang | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060173560 | Widrow | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195440 | Burges et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206460 | Gadkari et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206476 | Kapur et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282455 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287993 | Yao et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070038616 | Guha | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038622 | Meyerzon et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073748 | Barney | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106659 | Lu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150473 | Li et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070276829 | Wang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090106221 | Meyerzon et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106223 | Meyerzon et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106235 | Tankovich et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0950961 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0950961 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1050830 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1120717 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1282060 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1557770 | Jul 2005 | EP |
10091638 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11328191 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2002-091843 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2003-248696 | Sep 2003 | JP |
10-2002-0015838 | Mar 2002 | KR |
10-2003-0082109 | Oct 2003 | KR |
10-2006-0116042 | Nov 2006 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060136411 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |