1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to providing increased data accessibility for a personal computing device and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for allowing rapid access to certain data on a personal computing device that is powered down or otherwise in a power conservation state.
2. Background of the Related Art
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art which may be related to various aspects of the present invention which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Since the introduction of the first personal computer (“PC”) over 20 years ago, technological advances to make PCs more useful have continued at an amazing rate. Microprocessors that control PCs have become faster and faster, with operational speeds eclipsing the gigahertz (one billion operations per second) and continuing well beyond.
Productivity has also increased tremendously because of the explosion in development of software applications. In the early days of the PC, people who could write their own programs were practically the only ones who could make productive use of their computers. Today, there are thousands and thousands of software applications ranging from games to word processors and from voice recognition to web browsers.
In addition to becoming more powerful, computers have also become more mobile than ever before over the past few years. Notebook or laptop PCs have been steadily increasing in power while their cases (or footprint) continue to get lighter and more portable.
Another innovation in recent years has been the handheld PC. These ultra-small PCs have revolutionized productivity because they are highly mobile and provide such functions as wireless email connectivity and even interne browsing. Many handheld PCs are operated or controlled by a stylus or pen instead of a keyboard. In spite of these benefits, handheld PCs are not generally as powerful as their full-function desktop or notebook counterparts. Design considerations such as overall size, weight and heat dissipation prevent the use of the most powerful components (microprocessors, for example) in handheld PCs. These same design considerations prevent the use of large amounts of computer memory and other types of storage such as disk drives.
The tablet PC is an emerging type of personal computing device that is designed to incorporate the power of traditional desktop or notebook computers while offering many of the portability and simplicity features available in handheld PCs. For example, tablet PCs may incorporate a full-function processor and a full-function operating system such as Windows XP Professional, which is available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. In addition, tablet PCs may incorporate advanced video graphics capabilities and large hard drive storage capacity. Tablet PCs may additionally incorporate these powerful features while providing the user with the natural simplicity of a pen- or stylus-based interface, such as the interface typically found on a handheld PC. The combination of power and simplicity afforded by tablet PCs will allow support of handwriting recognition, which will make it possible for users to take handwritten notes, create drawings or annotate documents then wirelessly share the information with others.
Advances in computer technology, however, have not come without undesirable side effects. Modern computers are complex machines and they take a significant amount of time to become usable when they are first turned on. This is because most systems go through a power-on self test and various degrees of hardware and software initialization before they are ready for normal operation. Additional factors that may delay the start of normal operation at power-up or awakening from a reduced power state are: (1) BIOS startup, (2) waiting for a network interface card to initialize, including expiration of any timeouts associated with connecting to a network that is not present or providing a weak signal, and (3) hard drive spin-up.
The factors listed above are in addition to other factors such as the speed of a computer's processor (slower processor will result in slower execution of startup code) or the version and type of operating system being run on the computer (every Os has it's own set of initialization requirements that it must perform, such as enumerating Plug and Play devices, etc), Thus, the power-on initialization process may take over one or two minutes before the computer is ready for a user to launch an application program to obtain desired data. After that, the user must still launch the desired application and request access to the needed data. The time before the user actually gets the desired data may be even longer if the computer must connect to a network to access needed data.
The problem of slow data availability is compounded by the fact that modern computers are capable of being placed into a number of low-power consumption states. This feature is especially useful for handheld, notebook and tablet PCs that are capable of running on batteries. The ability to place these types of computers in power saving states contributes to longer periods between recharging the batteries. An industry standard specification known as the Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (“ACPI”) sets forth definitions and requirements for certain low-power states of computer operation. The ACPI specification defines a hibernation state, which the specification refers to by the designation “S4”). The “off” state is referred to in the ACPI specification by the designation “S5.”
In many cases, users of computers need faster access to data when they first power up their computers. A business user may need to quickly obtain the location of a meeting or a business associate's phone number or address. When data is needed expeditiously, the initial delay of a computer powering up can be a significant inconvenience. A method and apparatus of rapidly obtaining information from a computer that is powered down or otherwise in a low-power state is desirable.
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
Referring to the drawings.
A video display screen 12 extends to cover a significant portion of the front of the tablet PC 10. In the illustrated embodiment the video display 12 is touch-sensitive to facilitate handwriting recognition. The tablet PC 10 may include application software which supports handwriting recognition.
The tablet PC 10 and control panel 14, which may include an on-off switch and other control buttons. In addition, the control panel 14 is provided with a plurality of soft keys 16. The soft keys 16 may be programmed to support a wide variety of functions of the tablet PC 10. For example, the soft keys 16 may be programmed to allow a user to change the display mode of the tablet PC 10 or to access menus or other features associated with the operation of the tablet PC 10. As described below, the soft keys 16 may be programmed to allow rapid access to a user's data even though the tablet PC 10 is powered off or otherwise in a state of low power consumption such as a hibernation mode.
Email programs and other programs that allow users to manage their personal information, such as task lists, calendar data and contact information for customers and other colleagues or friends, are commonly used on traditional PCs and tablet PCs. Microsoft Outlook, which is available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., is an example of one such email program. Outlook features a task manager, a contact list, a calendar, as well as email and other functions. Generally speaking, Outlook is a type of a program referred to as a Personal Information Manager (or “PIM”). PIM programs primarily display relevant aspects of a user's personal information. For example, PIM programs may be used to view the user's calendar, task list, contact information or email among other data. Examples of such data that a user could get using the PIM include the time and location of an appointment or the telephone number or address of a business colleague. Through the rest of this document, although the examples cite references to Outlook, they are equally valid for other popular PIM applications such Lotus Notes, ACT and the like.
As set forth above, accessing this information typically requires a user to fully boot his PC from an “off” state (ACPI state S5) and launch Outlook (or any other PIM application) to gain access to the relevant PIM information. On a computing device using Windows XP which is also part of a business domain, the boot up or wakeup from hibernation process might also require the user to login (or revalidate) his credentials for authentication from the business information technology (“IT”) department to gain access to mail, etc. This process can take a relatively long time, especially if the user is running late or otherwise is in a hurry. Even if Outlook is left running when the user places the PC in a state of low power consumption, such as a hibernation state (ACPI state S4), it may take a considerable amount of time to gain access to information because outlook typically waits for the expiration of network connection timeouts when awakening from a state of low power consumption before displaying information to the user.
A BIOS-based browser 26 is implemented to read PIM data that is stored in the file 24. The non-volatile memory, which stores the file 24, may be accessible within a very short time (a few seconds) after request for information from a user. Thus, the information is available long before the user's computer is fully powered up or awakened from a reduced power state. The user's computer may be set up such that the user can request information from the file 24 by pressing a soft key 16 (
Microsoft Outlook is an example of an email program that may be used to implement the present invention. If Outlook is used, the interface between the email program 20 and the add-in component 22 may include two-way communication via the Outlook object model. Additionally, the interface in the disclosed embodiments includes IDTExtensibility2 COM interface functionality (see Microsoft Developer Network documentation for more information on the IDTExtensibility2 functionality), The specific details of the interface between the email program 20 and the add-in component 22 are not crucial aspects of the present invention.
Starting with Outlook 2000, Microsoft Corporation introduced the Office Add-In architecture, which allows the development of inproc COM servers that may leverage the object model (consisting of methods and events) of Outlook 2000 or later versions. That object model allows the automation of the functions and features of Outlook. This allows the import/export of information stored in Microsoft Exchange Servers even though the details of the data structures involved are not known.
A COM add-in is a COM component that interacts with Office 2000 applications. COM add-ins must meet two requirements: (1) the add-in must register itself as an Office add-in by setting values in the Microsoft Office section of the Windows registry, and (2) the add-in must implement the IDTExtensibility2 interface. When Microsoft Office invokes the add-in, it may use Office objects to perform actions such as customizing the user interface, creating new documents or creating special rules that evaluate incoming mail messages.
When Outlook (and other Office applications) load, they search for registered in-process components that implement the IDTExtensibility2 COM interface. That interface requires the methods set forth in Table 1:
Once loaded, these components can then interact with Outlook using the Microsoft Outlook Object Model. The specific implementation details of the Microsoft Outlook Object Model are not crucial aspects of the invention. Because the Microsoft Object Model is COM-based, any COM-aware language may be used to program the add-in and access the Object Model. Examples of languages that may be used are Microsoft Visual C++ and Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications. The add-in component 22 may be implemented as a dynamic-link library (DLL) but it may also be an executable program file.
Various categories of information that may be made accessible using the BIOS-based browser 26 are set forth below in Table 2:
Upon startup, the add-in component 22 may extract Outlook information that is currently available and store it in an XML file. XML may be used because of its portability, extensibility, and standards compliance.
On the occurrence of individual events, like addition, modification, or deletion of Outlook information, the individual XML files may be updated and/or synchronized to reflect the new information. When system-provided power management wake events occur, the same steps that are performed at start-up should be repeated (see previous paragraph). This will allow synchronization of items missed while the computer is in a state of low power consumption.
Prior to or upon exiting Outlook, or prior to the computer being placed in a low power state such as hibernation, or when a network connection is dropped or added (for example, a RAS connection), all of the individual XML files may be merged into a single unified XML file 38. The unified XML file 38 may employ a name with eight or fewer characters to the left of period followed by up to three characters to the right of the period (an 8.3 filename format) to allow the to be used in non-Windows computing environments. The specific format for individual XML files 30, 32, 34, 36 or the unified XML file 38 is not a crucial aspect of the invention.
In order to decouple and provide maximum amount of leverage for output compatibility, a style sheet (XSL or CSS) may be used to define rules for converting the unified XML file 38 into an HTML file 24 (
Different style-sheets may be used to perform output as suitable for viewer application. For example, different style sheets may be used to accommodate for differences in Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator HTML compatibility. In addition, the unified XML file 38 (or individual XML files 30, 32, 34 and 36 may be directly read by support applications such as third party synchronization applications.
Style sheets may be stored in a separate file or could be embedded in the same (merged) XML file. The software developer must accommodate for the syntax differences for the two options, depending on which method is employed. The unified XML file, the XSL style sheet, and the HTML file 24 may all be produced by the add-in component 22, but they do not have to be. For example, the style sheet may be pre-coded and kept separately. The add-in component 22 may merge them or use the MSXML (or other such parsers) to generate the HTML file 24.
The configuration and appearance of the user interface must be taken into account when designing and generating the corresponding style sheet. An influencing factor in developing an appropriate style sheet may be the HTML capabilities of the BIOS-based browser 26 that will access the HTML file 24.
To reduce the complexity and the overhead associated with designing the BIOS-based browser 26 to process XML code and XSL style sheets, the add-in component 22 (
The add-in component 22 may be designed to be an independent or stand-alone piece of code complete with a Windows-based setup and uninstall programs, if desired. The setup program may ensure that it is capable of executing and installing the add-in component 22 anywhere in the system, including a default location such as the non-volatile storage flash volume associated with the host computer. The setup program may be designed to detect whether the add-in component 22 has already been installed and, if so, to exit gracefully without reinstalling the program.
The version of HTML produced by the add-in component 22 may be matched with the level of HTML compatibility that the BIOS-based browser 26 supports. In order to accommodate cycling through data that might not all-fit onto one HTML screen, the resulting HTML may include scripting code. The inclusion of scripting code may be avoided if the user interface is designed to use web controls that allow built in navigation (for example, a list box as built in support for sliders, etc.).
The BIOS-based browser 26 may also support frames to logically and physically separate different categories of the PIM data on the display screen. Alternatively, the BIOS-based browser 26 may incorporate CSS for transforming the XML in the supported HTML format. If the BIOS-based browser 26 is designed to support XML and CSS, the HTML need not be generated because the BIOS-based browser 26 could generate it from the unified.xml file 38. In the illustrated embodiment, the PIM viewer may be accessed in a non-Windows environment (i.e. when the computer is not powered on). Thus, the BIOS-based browser 26 may support the level of HTML in which the HTML file 24 is created. The BIOS-based browser 26 may additionally support the Double Byte Character Set (“DBCS”) to allow support of international languages.
A protocol may be established to determine the default home page the BIOS-based browser 26 navigates to upon launch. The BIOS-based browser 26 may support a command line option to accept an HTML file that the BIOS-based browser 26 may navigate to upon launch. This functionality may be in addition to a protocol that allows changing of the default home page through programming.
The BIOS-based browser 26 may be implemented to support basic graphic file formats natively. These file formats may include JPEG, Gif, and bitmaps, with color depths of 16,256 and 64K color. Additionally, the BIOS-based browser 26 may provide basic browser-based controls for basic navigation. Such controls may include: Stop, Refresh, Back, Forward and the like.
The information contained in the unified.xml file 38 is processed with a style sheet and the results written into the HTML file 24 (
At 44, 46 examples of changes to a user's PIM data are depicted. The example shown at 44 depicts a change to the user's mail data and the example 46 depicts a change to the user's calendar data. Changes such as those depicted at 44, 46 could occur with respect to any of the email functional areas supported by a given embodiment of the invention (e.g. contacts and task lists as well as email and calendar data). The changes at 44, 46 are captured and result in corresponding writes to the XML files that store the data for the system components that have changed. For example, 48 depicts a change to the mail.xml file 32 (
When the user's computer is powered off or otherwise in a state of low power consumption, the user may choose to access the information stored in the HTML file 24. This access may be accomplished by pressing a soft key 16 (
When the user is finished using the PIM information, he/she may exit the BIOS-based browser 26, for example, by pressing (toggling) the same soft key 16 HW button. The user may also be able to exit the BIOS-based browser 26 by clicking on a control element displayed by the BIOS-based browser 26. When the BIOS-based browser is exited, the computer system need not be booted.
The BIOS-based browser 26 may be programmed to display error messages to the user based on certain conditions of the system. Examples of such error messages may include indications that no HTML file could be found or that no non-volatile memory storage (flash) is available to the BIOS-based browser 26 and the like. The specific conditions that generate these messages and the content of the messages themselves are not crucial aspects of the invention.
During the exit or shutdown process of Outlook, accurate updates may not be obtainable through Outlook's object model. Accordingly, it may be necessary to rely on data gathered from Outlook object model event notifications to update individual data categories.
The present invention may be employed if multiple users share the same computer (i.e. the PIM application on the computer is configured with multiple user accounts). To implement the invention in a multiple user environment, the xml files 30, 32, 34, 36 and 38 (
The user data stored in the HTML file does not necessarily have to be PIM data. It could be any type of data that the user desires to access in a rapid manner when his/her computer is powered down or otherwise in a state of low power consumption. For example, the user data may be web pages that were browsed by the user when the computer was powered up. Those pages may be stored in the HTML file 24 (
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/214,668 filed on Aug. 8, 2002 now granted as U.S. Pat. No. 7,882,162.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4542377 | Hagen et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4831368 | Masimo et al. | May 1989 | A |
5134390 | Kishimoto et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5173940 | Lantz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
D343168 | Morisaki et al. | Jan 1994 | S |
5329289 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337212 | Barlett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5436792 | Leman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5535093 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537531 | Suga et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5596697 | Foster et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5640176 | Mundt et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5682529 | Hendry et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708458 | Vrbanac | Jan 1998 | A |
5708561 | Huilgol et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5774233 | Sakamoto | Jun 1998 | A |
5790120 | Lozares et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5841424 | Kikinis | Nov 1998 | A |
5845282 | Alley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859628 | Ross et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5889964 | Cho et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899421 | Silverman | May 1999 | A |
5903254 | Mundt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923528 | Lee | Jul 1999 | A |
5941493 | Cheng | Aug 1999 | A |
5973664 | Badger | Oct 1999 | A |
5978912 | Rakavy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991897 | Perugini et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995139 | Lee | Nov 1999 | A |
6044436 | Otsuka | Mar 2000 | A |
6061104 | Evanicky et al. | May 2000 | A |
6125449 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137468 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157958 | Armitage et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176828 | Becker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189842 | Bergeron Gull et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189850 | Liao et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208996 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209088 | Reneris | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210327 | Brackett et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268845 | Pariza et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275932 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282642 | Cromer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289466 | Bayramoglu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301101 | Anzai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326978 | Robbins | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331867 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336142 | Kato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343006 | Moscovitch et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360327 | Hobson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366450 | Janicek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385668 | Gaddess et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401202 | Abgrall | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418010 | Sawyer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426872 | Sutton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437975 | Huang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443408 | Hung | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477588 | Yerazunis et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D469091 | Hasegawa et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
6504710 | Sutton et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522529 | Huilgol et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523125 | Kohno et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567101 | Thomas | May 2003 | B1 |
6583984 | Yin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6633976 | Stevens | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639788 | Liao et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6684326 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691187 | Schwerin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718464 | Cromer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727830 | Lui et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6763458 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771494 | Shimano | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781604 | Poynter | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785807 | Aguilar et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788527 | Doczy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795966 | Lim et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802018 | Bormann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856506 | Doherty et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874744 | Rawlings et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888532 | Wong et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895515 | Yamazaki | May 2005 | B1 |
6952725 | Raghunandan | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7025274 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7076539 | Reese et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089487 | Tsai | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7209124 | Hunt et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7302698 | Proudler et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7542052 | Solomon et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20010011302 | Son | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025289 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020024499 | Karidis et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020068558 | Janik | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129288 | Loh et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130836 | Ohmori et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135977 | Yin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020184395 | LeFevre et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009705 | Thelander et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030122864 | Jenne et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030122882 | Kho | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162152 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030222848 | Solomon et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234797 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236935 | Amemiya et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236971 | Rothman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017652 | Billington et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021678 | Ullah et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047505 | Ghassabian | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051726 | Martyn | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040243761 | Bohrer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
USPTO Advisory Action, Date Mailed Mar. 5, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 6. |
USPTO Advisory Action, Date Mailed Mar. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 3. |
Compaq, Aero 500/2 100 Pocket PC Reference Guide, Mar. 2000, pp. 41. |
USPTO Examiners Answer, Date Mailed Nov. 16, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 14. |
USPTO Final Action , Date Mailed Jan. 24, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658 , pp. 13. |
USPTO Final Action , Date Mailed Oct. 17, 2006 , U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658 , pp. 16. |
USPTO Final Action , Date Mailed Dec. 22, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818 , pp. 15. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Jan. 11, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 20. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Jan. 31, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 12. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Mar. 14, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 19. |
USPTO Notice of Allowability, Date Mailed Nov. 23, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 4. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, Date Mailed Dec. 19, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,827, pp. 4. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, Date Mailed Sep. 20, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 16. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, Date Mailed Dec. 30, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 7. |
USPTO Notice of Non-Compliance, Date Mailed Jan. 30, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 2. |
USPTO Office Action , Date Mailed Jun. 30, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818 , pp. 19. |
USPTO Office Action , Date Mailed Jul. 13, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 13. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Feb. 1, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 13. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Mar. 30, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 12. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Apr. 3, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/215,416, pp. 17. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Nov. 13, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 12. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Dec. 20, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 10. |
USPTO Office Action, Dated Mailed Apr. 20, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 9. |
One-Click Mobility Client Overview, Mar. 8, 2002, 2002-Pocket Presence AB, pp. 11. |
USPTO Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review, Date Mailed Jul. 6, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 2. |
USPTO Decision Letter, Date Mailed Oct. 21, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 10. |
USPTO Final Action date mailed Oct. 10, 2006 U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,827 pp. 9. |
USPTO Office Action date mailed Apr. 5, 2006 U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,827, pp. 8. |
USPTO Office Action dote mailed Sep. 30, 2004 U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,827 pp. 7. |
USPTO Office Action, dated mailed Apr. 7, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 21. |
USPTO Office Action, date mailed Apr. 27, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,655, pp. 30. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Apr. 11, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 11. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Jun. 14, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 18/214,668, pp. 9. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Jul. 10, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 9. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Sep. 21, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 12. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Sep. 21, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,655, pp. 15. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Oct. 6, 2004 , U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 15. |
USPTO Final Action, Date Mailed Oct. 14, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 18. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, Date Mailed Jan. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 4. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, Date Mailed May 28, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 24. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed May 3, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 14. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Jun. 4, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 11. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Jun. 11, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 12. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Jul. 12, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,818, pp. 16. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Sep. 19, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/214,668, pp. 11. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Sep. 21, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,658, pp. 10. |
USPTO Office Action, Date Mailed Oct. 17, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/215,416, pp. 19. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110087643 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10214668 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 12972643 | US |