This application contains subject matter related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,440 issued Oct. 31, 2006 entitled SINGLE AXIS LIGHT PIPE FOR HOMOGENIZING SLOW AXIS OF ILLUMINATION BASED ON LASER DIODES by Bruce Adams, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 7,135,392 issued Nov. 13, 2006 entitled THERMAL FLUX LASER ANNEALING FOR ION IMPLANTATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR P-N JUNCTIONS by Bruce Adams, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/195,380 filed Aug. 2, 2005 (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0102607 published May 18, 2006) entitled MULTIPLE BAND PASS FILTERING FOR PYROMETRY IN LASER BASED ANNEALING SYSTEMS by Bruce Adams et al.; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/198,660 filed Aug. 5, 2005 (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0105585 published May 18, 2006) entitled AUTOFOCUS FOR HIGH POWER LASER DIODE BASED ANNEALING SYSTEM by Dean Jennings, et al., all of which applications are assigned to the present assignee.
The invention relates generally to thermal processing of semiconductor substrates. In particular, the invention relates to laser thermal processing of semiconductor substrates.
Thermal processing is required in the fabrication of silicon and other semiconductor integrated circuits formed in silicon wafers or other substrates such as glass panels for displays. The required temperatures may range from relatively low temperatures of less than 250° C. to greater than 1000°, 1200°, or even 1400° C. and may be used for a variety of processes such as dopant implant annealing, crystallization, oxidation, nitridation, silicidation, and chemical vapor deposition as well as others.
For the very shallow circuit features required for advanced integrated circuits, it is greatly desired to reduce the total thermal budget in achieving the required thermal processing. The thermal budget may be considered as the total time at high temperatures necessary to achieve the desired processing temperature. The time that the wafer needs to stay at the highest temperature can be very short.
Rapid thermal processing (RTP) uses radiant lamps which can be very quickly turned on and off to heat only the wafer and not the rest of the chamber. Pulsed laser annealing using very short (about 20 ns) laser pulses is effective at heating only the surface layer and not the underlying wafer, thus allowing very short ramp up and ramp down rates.
A more recently developed approach in various forms, sometimes called thermal flux laser annealing or dynamic surface annealing (DSA), is described by Jennings et al. in PCT/2003/00196966 based upon U.S. Pat. No. 6,987,240, issued Jan. 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Markle describes a different form in U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,681 and Talwar yet a further version in U.S. Pat. No. 6,747,245.
The Jennings and Markle versions use CW diode lasers to produce very intense beams of light that strike the wafer as a thin long line of radiation. The line is then scanned over the surface of the wafer in a direction perpendicular to the long dimension of the line beam.
A system for thermal processing of a substrate includes a source of radiation, optics disposed between the source and the substrate to receive light from the source of radiation at the optics proximate end, and a housing holding the optics and having a void inside the housing isolated from light emitted from the source. A sealant is between the optics proximate end and the source of radiation. A light detector is disposed within said void in the housing to detect light from the optics emitted into the housing and send a deterioration signal. The system further includes a power supply for the source of radiation, and a controller to control the power supply based on the deterioration signal from the light detector.
One embodiment of the apparatus described in the above-referenced application by Jennings et al. is illustrated in the schematic orthographic representation of
In typical operation, the gantry beams 16, 18 are set at a particular position along the fixed rails 12, 14 and the beam source 20 is moved at a uniform speed along the gantry beams 16, 18 to scan the line beam 26 perpendicularly to its long dimension in a direction conveniently called the fast direction. The line beam 26 is thereby scanned from one side of the wafer 22 to the other to irradiate a 1 cm swath of the wafer 22. The line beam 26 is narrow enough and the scanning speed in the fast direction fast enough that a particular area of the wafer is only momentarily exposed to the optical radiation of the line beam 26 but the intensity at the peak of the line beam is enough to heat the surface region to very high temperatures. However, the deeper portions of the wafer 22 are not significantly heated and further act as a heat sink to quickly cool the surface region. Once the fast scan has been completed, the gantry beams 16, 18 are moved along the fixed rails 12, 14 to a new position such that the line beam 26 is moved along its long dimension extending along the slow axis. The fast scanning is then performed to irradiate a neighboring swath of the wafer 22. The alternating fast and slow scanning are repeated, perhaps in a serpentine path of the beam source 20, until the entire wafer 22 has been thermally processed.
The optics beam source 20 includes an array of lasers. An example is orthographically illustrated in
Returning to
The optics beam source 20 can further include conventional optical elements. Such conventional optical elements can include an interleaver and a polarization multiplexer, although the selection by the skilled worker of such elements is not limited to such an example. In the example of
A first set of interleaved beams is passed through a quarter-wave plate 48 to rotate its polarization relative to that of the second set of interleaved beams. Both sets of interleaved beams are input to a polarization multiplexer (PMUX) 52 having a structure of a double polarization beam splitter. Such a PMUX is commercially available from Research Electro Optics. First and second diagonal interface layers 54, 56 cause the two sets of interleaved beams to be reflected along a common axis from their front faces. The first interface 54 is typically implemented as a dielectric interference filter designed as a hard reflector (HR) while the second interface 56 is implemented as a dielectric interference filter designed as a polarization beam splitter (PBS) at the laser wavelength. As a result, the first set of interleaved beams reflected from the first interface layer 54 strikes the back of the second interface layer 56. Because of the polarization rotation introduced by the quarter-wave plate 48, the first set of interleaved beams passes through the second interface layer 56. The intensity of a source beam 58 output by the PMUX 52 is doubled from that of the either of the two sets of interleaved beams.
Although shown separated in the drawings, the interleaver 42, the quarter-wave plate 48, and the PMUX 52 and its interfaces 54, 56, as well as additional filters that may be attached to input and output faces are typically joined together by a plastic encapsulant, such as a UV curable epoxy, to provide a rigid optical system. An important interface is the plastic bonding of the lenslets 40 to the laser stacks 32, on which they must be aligned to the bars 34. The source beam 58 is passed through a set of cylindrical lenses 62, 64, 66 to focus the source beam 58 along the slow axis.
A one-dimensional light pipe 70 homogenizes the source beam along the slow axis. The source beam, focused by the cylindrical lenses 62, 64, 66, enters the light pipe 70 with a finite convergence angle along the slow axis but substantially collimated along the fast axis. The light pipe 70, more clearly illustrated in the orthographic view of
The source beam output by the light pipe 70 is generally uniform. As further illustrated in the schematic view of
One problem in laser radiation thermal processing is maintaining the integrity of the optics and rapidly detecting its deterioration thus preventing imminent failure of the laser source. To a large extent, the integrity of the optics depends on of the condition of the interfaces at which the optics components are joined together. Typically, the optics components are attached to each other at their interfaces with adhesives. If one of the components or the adhesive degrades, significant amounts of radiation power is scattered within the housing encapsulating the optics instead of propagating through the optics toward the substrate. It is desired to restrict the damage to the one section of components in which the failure is occurring. For example, the lenslets are epoxied to the laser bar stacks and may delaminate from the stacks causing the laser light to scatter within the chamber. It is desired to restrict the damage to the lenslets and not allow the scattered radiation to heat up and degrade the other components, for example, the PMUX and interleaver and interfaces attached to them. Conventionally, a thermocouple is used to measure an increase in the ambient temperature within the housing or the temperature of optical assemblies resulting from the increase of laser radiation. However, the response time of a thermocouple is often too slow to report a rapid catastrophic system failure, and the system may collapse before an appreciable rise in the housing temperature occurs. A rapid indication of the level of radiation energy within the housing is therefore desired to detect a component failure and prevent the catastrophic deterioration of the system. One aspect of this invention uses photodiodes to detect the failure in the system components and enable a timely shutdown of the system.
Referring to
The light detector 81 is preferably located inside the housing 68 adjacent to the laser stacks 32, the interleaver 42, or the PMUX 52 and can be supported by a support structure 82, such as a support ring attached to the housing 68. The light detector 81 should be out of the direct path of the laser light assuming the optical components have not degraded. It should also be out of the path of waste light, for example waste beams 110 from the interleaver 42 that are imperfectly reflected and interleaved or the residual light 111 that is transmitted through wavelength or polarization selective reflectors, such as the interfaces 54, 56 in the PMUX 52. The photodetector 81 should also be out of the direct path of the laser light reflected from the wafer 22, perhaps at angles that are not specular because of the wafer surface structure. The photo detector 81 should also not point to the radiation dumps used to suppress the waste radiation. Instead, the light detector 81 should be pointing in a direction that is nominally dark. For example, the photo detector 81 may be located in back of the laser stacks 32 and be pointed along an optical axis 112 directed to a portion of the housing 68 at the lateral side of the laser stack 32 that normally does not receive radiation from the laser bars. When one of the optical components begins to fail or its adhesive or encapsulant loosens, the tightly controlled optical focusing is lost, and laser radiation from the bar stacks 32 begins to propagate along unintended paths and strike unintended reflective structures within the housing 68. That is, imminent failure is marked by an increase of ambient radiation within the housing 68 at the laser wavelength.
Optionally, the support structure 82 for the photo detector 81 may be a translation mechanism to move the light detector 81 vertically in order to sense light radiation level in various areas across the housing 68.
The translation mechanism 82 can be fixedly attached to the frame of the housing 68 and can be capable of extending and detracting along a path across the housing 68 to obtain the most optically advantageous position for the light detector 81. The translation mechanism 82 can include a horizontal actuator that can move the light detector laterally in order to adjust the distance between the light detector 81 and optics in the housing 68. Optionally, a rotary actuator can be connected to the housing 68 in order to rotate the light detector 81 around the optics in the housing.
Referring to
The photo diode preferably is a silicon photodiode made of “n” type silicon material. The basic elements of photo diode 81 include a “p” layer formed on the front surface of the device. The interface between the “p” layer and the “n” silicon is known as a pn junction. Alternatively, the photodiode 81 is formed of a “n” layer on a “p” substrate. Other types of silicon photodetectors are known, such as pin photodiodes and charged coupled devices and photodetectors of other materials are available. Metal contacts are connected to the anode and cathode of the photo diode is the anode. Unillustrated biasing circuitry provides the requisite biasing voltage to the photodiode and amplifies and separates the photocurrent to the comparator 86.
The photodetector 81 may be disposed inside the housing 68 or alternatively disposed outside of it with either an optically transparent window or with an optical fiber receiving radiation inside the housing 68 and conveying it to the photodetector located outside. Either zero or reverse bias photodiodes 74 can be used, although the reverse biased photodiodes are more preferable for the rapid detection of the increased laser radiation in the housing 68 because their circuits are more sensitive to light.
High voltage is preferably applied to the diode contacts of the reverse biased diode to increase the sensitivity of the diode to the radiation. The voltage is applied across the high resistance of the reversed biased semiconductor junction. The high resistance is reduced when light of an appropriate frequency impinges on the diode. For a fast response time required in the system 30, the resistance and operating voltage of the photo diode 81 must be chosen corresponding to the operating wavelengths between 810 nm and 1550 nm. Alternatively stated, the detected photons generate electron-hole pairs in the vicinity of the pn junction, which is detected in the sensing circuit as a photocurrent.
Referring to
The operations of the system of
In operation, the power supply 100 provides electric power to energize the beam source 20, which includes laser light source and optical system 30, for emission of a downwardly directed beam 24 for thermal processing of the substrate. The light scattered in the housing 68 from the optical system 30 under the normal operational conditions of the system 30 can be sensed by the photo diode 81. The photo diode 81, which is sensitive to the normal operational light energy emitted in the housing 68 by the interleaver 42 and the PMUX 52, can generate a continuous current response signal to the comparator 86 proportional to the intensity of the amount of the scattered light received. When one or more of the optical components of the system 30, including the reflective and anti-reflective coatings, or adhesives which seal the interfaces of the interleaver 42 and the PMUX 52 or the cylindrical lens 62, 64, 66, begin to fail, the light radiated through the ruptured component escapes from the optical system 30 into the housing 68. A large increase in radiated power scattered within the housing 68 is immediately detected by the photo diode 81 and a current signal proportional to the increased radiation is sent to the comparator 86. The controller 90 receives from the comparator 86 a signal associated with the condition that exceeds a predetermined baseline value corresponding to the radiation in the housing 68 under the normal operations. This indicates the presence of the deterioration of the optical system 30, and the controller 90 immediately disengages the power supply 100 based on the data from the comparator 86 to stop further emission of the light radiation from the beam source 20.
Although the invention has been described with respect to scanning of a linear laser beam, the invention may be applied to other thermal processing system involving high intensity radiation, for example, a pixel pulsed laser system or a blanket irradiation system.
The system for optical control of thermal processing of a substrate has several advantages. The system provides a measurement technique of the level of light radiation that is suitable for the high temperature and high radiation level environment of a laser thermal processing system. Furthermore, the light detector 81 can move within the housing 68 and consequently the light detector 81 can be capable of obtaining the most advantageous position for the photo diode window or optical fiber connection 92 to sense an excessive light radiation. The system can be simple, robust and inexpensive and does not require change to the layout of the laser thermal processing system. Most importantly, the system enables a much more rapid response than any existing measuring technique for the detection and prevention of catastrophic failure that would occur in the absence of rapid intervention.
It may be possible to carry out the invention without either the interleaver 42 or the polarization multiplexer 52 or without both of them. While the invention has been described in detail by specific reference to preferred embodiments, it is understood that variations and modifications thereof may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/185,454 filed Jul. 20, 2005 entitled RAPID DETECTION OF IMMINENT FAILURE IN LASER THERMAL PROCESSING OF A SUBSTRATE by Bruce Adams, et al., which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/627,529 filed Nov. 12, 2004, both of which are assigned to the present assignee.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3778791 | Lewicki et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4015100 | Gnanamuthu et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4079230 | Miyauchi et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4099875 | McMahon et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4305640 | Cullis et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4316074 | Daly | Feb 1982 | A |
4448547 | Wickersheim | May 1984 | A |
4647774 | Nrisk et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4694136 | Kasner et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4730113 | Edwards | Mar 1988 | A |
4818886 | Drucker | Apr 1989 | A |
5238858 | Matsushita | Aug 1993 | A |
5463202 | Kurosawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5861992 | Gelbart | Jan 1999 | A |
5886313 | Krause et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6040787 | Durham | Mar 2000 | A |
6080236 | McCulloch et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6240116 | Lang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6494371 | Rekow et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6530687 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531681 | Markle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6747245 | Talwar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771686 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780692 | Tatsuiki et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6809012 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6847457 | Tobiason et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6895164 | Saccomanno | May 2005 | B2 |
6987240 | Jennings et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7005601 | Jennings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7129440 | Adams et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135392 | Adams et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7494272 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20030196996 | Jennings et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234970 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040095983 | Whitley | May 2004 | A1 |
20040136662 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149217 | Collins et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179807 | Tanaka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188399 | Smart | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198028 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040263986 | Brown | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050063451 | Abe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050175285 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060008237 | Imade | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060102607 | Adams et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105585 | Jennings et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114572 | Bittner | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080025368 | Aderhold et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080210671 | Jennings et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090200279 | Li | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090296774 | Koelmel et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10339237 | Mar 2004 | DE |
0231794 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0458388 | Nov 1991 | EP |
57099747 | Jun 1982 | JP |
57-167692 | Oct 1982 | JP |
07-134069 | May 1995 | JP |
02000091231 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2003-245789 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 03089184 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004044955 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Action Dated Dec. 31, 2009 Issued in Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/283,615. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 20, 2009 in Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/198,660. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 19, 2012 Issued in Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,906. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 26, 2011 Issued in Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,906. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080217306 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60627529 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11185454 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12075798 | US |