The present disclosure relates generally to ignition systems for gas burners and more particularly to ignition systems having electrical resistive hot surface igniters.
Currently, gas cooktops consist of two to eight individual gas burners mounted atop a metallic or ceramic glass cooktop surface. Generally, the burners will consist of a cap and a main burner body, where exhaust gas ports are placed around its periphery. Gas is supplied through user actuable valves that individually control flow to a respective burner. The gas is then directed through gas tubing to an orifice where the gas flow is exhausted at flow rates sufficient to entrain enough air into the gas flow stream to permit combustion at the exhaust ports of the burners. The gas at each burner is ignited at some point near one or several of the exhaust ports. According to United States regulatory requirements, ignition devices for the gas burners must successfully ignite the gas within four (4) seconds of turning the valve to a corresponding ignition point. Generally, cooktop appliances or gas range appliances in the United States and throughout the world either use a spark igniter or a standing pilot system to ignite the gas/air combination exhausted out of the exhaust ports. The standing pilot is a low flow, continuous flame that stays lit even when the system is not in use.
Spark igniters generally only function when a control of a gas cooking appliance is set to a certain position, i.e. at the ignition setpoint on the gas valve knob. Spark igniter systems generally energize all igniters regardless of the specific gas knob being activated. A variation of a spark igniter system that is commonly used on higher end products consists of spark igniter system with a flame sense technology that permits the spark igniter to fire at any non-off control knob position if flame is not sensed. There are several flame sense technologies in practice including those that use temperature sensing devices and those that detect ground to igniter voltage changes when the flame is no longer present. Both of these flame sense technologies are hampered by occasional reliability issues where a false loss of flame is sensed and the igniters fire off sparks when not necessary. Because of the unnecessary activation of the spark igniters, when for example, a burner flame is falsely determined to be lost or out, and because the burner flame sensing is hidden to the consumer, there is often a mistrust of the technology and a perception of not being trustworthy in properly evaluating loss of flame.
In some gas oven applications, hot surface, electrical resistive igniters have replaced pilot lights and spark igniters. Because of their fairly large thermal mass, typical hot surface igniters are relatively slow to reach ignition temperatures and thus require a delay between the user turning on the oven and the opening of the gas control valve feeding fuel to the gas burners inside the oven. It is fairly common for ovens to require a delay on the order of thirty (30) to sixty (60) seconds to allow the surface igniter to heat up to an auto-ignition temperature (e.g. about 700 degrees centigrade for natural gas). While this approach is acceptable to the consumer oven applications, such an extended delay would create a perception to the same consumer of unsafe operation for a cooktop application. Recent advances in low mass, highly conductive ceramic, hot surface igniters using such base materials as silicon nitride, silicon carbide, and other comparable inorganic compounds have led to the development of hot surface igniters that can reach ignition temperatures well within the four (4) second threshold, while still meeting reasonable expectations for a long service life, more attainable. However, the development of a fast responding system using hot surface igniters for appliance applications has been hindered by complexity, lack of reliability, and/or high cost. Typically, microcomputers have been used to control the heating of the hot surface igniter. In one example, an ignition system for a gas burner uses a control algorithm based on an alternating current (AC) modulated signal where a second voltage is applied to the hot surface igniter for maintaining a temperature lower than the fuel ignition temperature. Here the steady state voltage with the igniter below the fuel ignition temperature is intended to permit a longer igniter life cycle. These igniters that are maintained at a steady state below the fuel ignition temperature are generally a silicon nitride igniter with a tungsten filament that is prone to aging.
In another example the microcomputer controls the igniter so that the igniter is rapidly heated via control of the AC power supply to attain ignition temperature and then subsequently reduced from the initial power levels to maintain ignition temperature based on a learning routine. In other examples, the level of AC power to the igniter is based on the determined value of AC voltage available to energize the igniter and on the determined value of the igniter resistance. In still other examples, power is modulated to the igniter by trimming alternating current cycles using, for example, triacs. The main disadvantages of such microcomputer based approaches include a fairly high level of complexity and cost, the potential of software based decisions acting inappropriately for a safety critical system, and, in the case of the AC modulated solutions, a risk of failing due to excessive amounts of power being fed into the igniter. In many applications, there is a requirement that flame sensing technology must be employed concurrently with the hot surface technology to enable a sufficiently long use life. This approach, however, is contrary to research that shows many consumers would prefer to see a continuously glowing igniter as it is perceived to be a more reliable ignition source and to make it easy to detect that igniter is not working properly.
It would be advantageous to control a low voltage DC powered electrical resistive igniter without a microprocessor so that a flame is ignited within a predetermined time period where the igniter is reliable throughout a projected life of a cooktop on which it is installed.
As described herein, the exemplary embodiments overcome one or more of the above or other disadvantages known in the art.
One aspect of the exemplary embodiments relates to an ignition control system for an appliance including a gas burner, a user actuable valve for controlling a flow of fuel to the burner and an electrical resistance igniter for igniting fuel at the burner. The control system includes a user actuable control interface having an off state and an on state, coupled to the valve operative to control the valve and provide a control signal indicative of the state of the control interface. The control system also includes a controller having a timer circuit responsive to the control signal and a boost circuit coupled to the timer circuit. The timer circuit is configured to activate the boost circuit for a predetermined period of time. A first direct current power supply is selectively coupled to the electrical resistance igniter by the boost circuit, such that power from the first power supply is provided to the electrical resistance igniter through the boost circuit when the boost circuit is activated. A second direct current power supply is coupled to the electrical resistance igniter and control interface. The second power supply is configured to provide power to the electrical resistance igniter after expiration of the predetermined time period to maintain the igniter at a predetermined temperature above an ignition temperature of the fuel as long as the valve remains on. The voltage from the first direct current power supply is greater than a voltage from the second direct current power supply.
Another aspect of the exemplary embodiments relates to a method for controlling energizing of an electrical resistance igniter in a control system for an appliance having a burner. The method includes receiving a signal in a timer circuit from a respective control interface of the appliance when the respective control interface is in an on position. Power is provided from a first direct current power supply to the electrical resistance igniter through activation of a respective boost circuit, where the timer activates the respective boost circuit for a predetermined period of time. After expiration of the predetermined period of time, the respective boost circuit is deactivated and the power provided to the electrical resistance igniter is switched from the first direct current power supply to a second direct current power supply to maintain the igniter at a predetermined temperature above an ignition temperature of the fuel, where a voltage provided by the second direct current power supply is less than a voltage supplied by the first direct current power supply.
Still another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to an ignition control system for a gas cooking appliance. The appliance includes a burner, a user actuable valve for controlling a flow of fuel to the burner and movable between an off state and an on state, and an electrical resistance igniter for igniting fuel at the burner. The control system includes a control interface coupled to the valve; a control board including a boost circuit and a timer circuit, the timer circuit being coupled to the boost circuit and the control interface, the control interface being configured to communicate a control signal to the timer circuit for activation of the boost circuit for a predetermined period of time; a first direct current power supply coupled to the boost circuit and the electrical resistance igniter, where power from the first power supply is provided to the electrical resistance igniter through the boost circuit during the predetermined period of time; and a second direct current power supply coupled to the electrical resistance igniter and the control interface, the second direct current power supply being configured to provide power to the electrical resistance igniter after expiration of the predetermined time period to maintain the igniter at a predetermined temperature above an ignition temperature of the fuel, wherein a voltage from the first direct current power supply is greater than a voltage from the second direct current power supply.
These as other aspects and advantages of the exemplary embodiments will become more apparent from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed solely for the purposes of illustration and not as a definition of the limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the appended claims. Moreover, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that, unless otherwise indicated, they are merely intended to conceptually illustrate the structures and procedures described herein. In addition, any suitable size, shape or type of elements or materials could be used.
In the drawings:
In one exemplary embodiment, referring to
In one aspect, the exemplary embodiments provide a cooking appliance 100 having a frame 110 forming a cooktop 120. The cooktop 120 includes surface heating units in the form of burners 130 and grates 140 for supporting items to be heated over the burners. The cooking appliance 100 also includes suitable user actuable controls such as, for exemplary purposes only, gas control interfaces, such as knobs 150 that are connected to suitable control valves and a manifold for selectively providing fuel to a respective one of the burners 130 to enable the user to control the heat output of the burners. The control interfaces have an off state selected by the user when no energization of the burner is desired and an on state which includes all non-off positions of the interface, which in the case of knobs may be a plurality of specifically designated discrete positions or the continuous rotational positions of the knob other than the designated off position. Referring also to
The control circuits 412A-412E include boost circuits 420A-420E respectively, one of which is shown in greater detail in
Still referring to
In one example, the hot surface igniter 230 of
In a spark igniter system, a very large voltage potential is maintained and discharged rapidly until the control knob is rotated away from or off the ignition setting. In the exemplary embodiments, the hot surface igniter 230 remains energized during the use cycle of the burner (e.g. as long as the respective control knob is in an “on” position). Any change in voltage of the hot surface igniter 230 can be detected and used to alert the cooking appliance operator of, for example, a loss of igniter function or a change in resistance of the igniter.
In one example, the hot surface igniter 230 may also function as a low wattage heater that may be used in lieu of a gas flame during low heat cooking modes such as, for example, a simmer. In one example, the hot surface igniter 230 may function as a heater having about a 25 watt power rating. In alternate examples, the hot surface igniter 230 may be configured to have any suitable power ratings for low heat cooking modes. Where the hot surface igniter 230 is used as a heater during low heat cooking modes, the gas flow to the respective burner 130 is shut off. For example, the control knob 150 may be configured with a low or simmer setting near, for example, the end of the control knob's rotation, that turns off the gas valve but maintains the respective hot surface igniter 230 in an energized state. It should be understood that other suitable control interfaces (other than mechanical knobs and valves) may be used to control operation of the gas valves such as, for exemplary purposes only, sliders, buttons, solenoids and electronic control panels.
The hot surface igniter 230 may be placed any suitable distance relative to the stability chamber 245 for igniting the gas exhausted from the gas port 240 and/or simmer port 247. In one exemplary embodiment a tip 230T of the hot surface igniter 230 may be disposed, for example, substantially horizontally from-a simmer port 247A disposed within the stability chamber 245 of the burner 130 by a distance D2 of about 0.125 inches to about 0.75 inches. In one example, the distance D2 may be about 0.60 inches. In another example, the distance D2 may be about 0.25 inches. The tip 230T of the hot surface igniter 230 may also be vertically disposed relative to the gas port 247A in the stability chamber 245 within a distance D1 of about 0.0625 inches. In another example, the tip 230T of the hot surface igniter 230 may also be vertically disposed relative to the gas port 247A within a distance D1 of about 0.030 inches. In still other examples the distances D1 and D2 may be any suitable distances for providing sufficient heat adjacent the burner for igniting the burner flame in the manner described herein.
Referring also to
The first and second low voltage direct current (DC) power supplies 440, 450 shown in
Referring to
In the example of
When a burner switch 150 is turned on, the first switching device 610 receives the output signal 605 of the timer 500. The first switching device 610 causes the second switching device 620 to turn on. When the second switching device 620 is turned on, the power from the first power supply 440 is provided to the hot surface igniter 230. Suitable protective devices 630, such as diodes, may be provided between the boost circuit 420 and the second power supply 450 to prevent current from flowing from the first power supply 440 to the second power supply 450. At the end of the time cycle generated by the timer 500, the state of output signal 505 from the timer 500 that is supplied to the first switching device 610 changes and causes the second switching device 620 to turn off. This interrupts the flow of power from the first power supply 440 to the hot surface igniter 230.
For example, in one embodiment, when a control knob 150 is switched on, or closes, the output 505 of timer 500 goes high. This causes first switching device 610 to conduct, which in turn biases the second switching device 620 to conduct. The output of the boost circuit 420 is coupled to the hot surface igniter 230. For either of the first power supply 440 or second power supply 450 to supply power to the hot surface igniter 430, the control knob 150 needs to be in the closed position. When the control knob 150 is closed, the timer 500 sees the falling edge of the corresponding voltage signal and the output from the boost circuit 420, the boost circuit voltage from first power supply 440, is applied to the hot surface igniter 230. After the set timing cycle of the timer 500 expires, the output 505 from the timer circuit 500 goes low. The second power supply 450, or low voltage supply, continues to power the hot surface igniter 230 as long as the control knob 150 remains in the on, or closed position. In one embodiment, the control knob 150 comprises a double pole, single throw (DPST) switch.
The boost circuit 420 (or the control board 490 in
The cooking appliance controls, such as control knob 150 in
The exemplary embodiments described herein provide an ignition control system for a gas burner that uses simple electronic principles and does not utilize a computer or software to evaluate operation of the system. The control board 490 described herein modulates power individually to each of the hot surface igniters 230 and mitigates in-rush current. The control system described herein isolates igniter failures and improves the overall life of the igniter by distributing usage time, as each igniter is operated independently.
Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omission and substitutions and changes in the form and details of devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps, which perform substantially the same way to achieve the same results, are with the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3705783 | Warren | Dec 1972 | A |
4600827 | Linwood et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4669430 | Reinold et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4858576 | Jeffries et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4925385 | McCord, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
4925386 | Donnelly et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935606 | Geary | Jun 1990 | A |
5329918 | Di Bari | Jul 1994 | A |
5416300 | Hickl et al. | May 1995 | A |
5725368 | Arensmeier | Mar 1998 | A |
5769622 | Aoki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5865612 | Hill et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5951276 | Jaeschke et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6104008 | Larson | Aug 2000 | A |
6217312 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6474979 | Rippelmeyer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6521869 | Donnelly et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6966315 | Pickering | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7148454 | Chodacki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7671305 | Chodacki et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7798139 | Gagas et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20030164368 | Chodacki et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20070007278 | Chodacki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070128563 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20100108658 | Chodacki et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110086319 | Chodacki et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110207065 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |