Patent Grant
10497219
This disclosure relates generally to electronic gaming devices, and more particularly to video poker gaming devices that are configured to allow a rapid speed of game play.
Video draw poker is a popular casino game. Players spend hours wagering on the game, largely due to tradition and simplicity of the basic rules. That said, deciding which cards to discard on the deal can be challenging, especially for newer players. In a simple game such as Jacks or Better, players must play for the best paying hand with the best chance of receiving any required cards on the draw to achieve the maximum possible awards. Sometimes, deciding which cards to hold and which cards to discard is counter intuitive. That is, sometimes it is more advantageous to go for a higher paying hand even though a player is less likely to achieve it then a lower paying hand.
Also, video poker is a comparatively slow game with an average speed of 6 seconds per game. Because many of the paytables preferred by players don't allow for a large hold percentage (%), casinos often find it difficult to earn enough revenue to justify offering the game. Simple “jacks or better” draw poker, for example, holds only about 0.5% when configured with a 6/9 paytable (that is a paytable that pays 6 times the player's wager for a flush and 9 times a player's wager for a full house) and the player playing the best theoretical strategy. Given that the most popular poker games are played with a typical $1.25 wager, and with only 600 decisions per hour, the casino's profit may amount to only S1.25*600*0.5%=$3.75 per hour.
In order to earn a reasonable return, casinos must cut the amounts awarded for many jackpots, which in turn decreases player interest in the game. Hence, there exists a need for a video poker game that eliminates the drudgery of playing for small wins and simultaneously provides the standard games and paytables players prefer while increasing the hourly profits earned by casinos.
Referring to
The gaming device 10 includes a cabinet 15 housing components to operate the gaming device 10. The cabinet 15 may include a gaming display 20, a base portion 13, a top box 18, and a player interface panel 30. The gaming display 20 may include mechanical spinning reels (
The base portion 13 may include a lighted panel 14, a coin return (not shown), and a gaming handle 12 operable on a partially rotating pivot joint 11. The game handle 12 is traditionally included on mechanical spinning-reel games, where the handle may be pulled toward a player to initiate the spinning of reels 22 after placement of a wager. The top box 18 may include a lighted panel 17, a video display (such as an LCD monitor), a mechanical bonus device (not shown), and a candle light indicator 19. The player interface panel 30 may include various devices so that a player can interact with the gaming device 10.
The player interface panel 30 may include one or more game buttons 32 that can be actuated by the player to cause the gaming device 10 to perform a specific action. For example, some of the game buttons 32 may cause the gaming device 10 to bet a credit to be wagered during the next game, change the number of lines being played on a multi-line game, cash out the credits remaining on the gaming device (as indicated on the credit meter 27), or request assistance from casino personnel, such as by lighting the candle 19. In addition, the player interface panel 30 may include one or more game actuating buttons 33. The game actuating buttons 33 may initiate a game with a pre-specified amount of credits. On some gaming devices 10 a “Max Bet” game actuating button 33 may be included that places the maximum credit wager on a game and initiates the game. The player interface panel 30 may further include a bill acceptor 37 and a ticket printer 38. The bill acceptor 37 may accept and validate paper money or previously printed tickets with a credit balance. The ticket printer 38 may print out tickets reflecting the balance of the credits that remain on the gaming device 10 when a player cashes out by pressing one of the game buttons 32 programmed to cause a ‘cashout.’ These tickets may be inserted into other gaming machines or redeemed at a cashier station or kiosk for cash.
The gaming device 10 may also include one or more speakers 26 to transmit auditory information or sounds to the player. The auditory information may include specific sounds associated with particular events that occur during game play on the gaming device 10. For example, a particularly festive sound may be played during a large win or when a bonus is triggered. The speakers 26 may also transmit “attract” sounds to entice nearby players when the game is not currently being played.
The gaming device 10 may further include a secondary display 25. This secondary display 25 may be a vacuum fluorescent display (VFD), a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma screen, or the like. The secondary display 25 may show any combination of primary game information and ancillary information to the player. For example, the secondary display 25 may show player tracking information, secondary bonus information, advertisements, or player selectable game options.
The gaming device 10 may include a separate information window (not shown) dedicated to supplying any combination of information related to primary game play, secondary bonus information, player tracking information, secondary bonus information, advertisements or player selectable game options. This window may be fixed in size and location or may have its size and location vary temporally as communication needs change. One example of such a resizable window is International Game Technology's “service window.” Another example is Las Vegas Gaming Incorporated's retrofit technology which allows information to be placed over areas of the game or the secondary display screen at various times and in various situations.
The gaming device 10 includes a microprocessor 40 that controls operation of the gaming device 10. If the gaming device 10 is a standalone gaming device, the microprocessor 40 may control virtually all of the operations of the gaming devices and attached equipment, such as operating game logic stored in memory (not shown) as firmware, controlling the display 20 to represent the outcome of a game, communicating with the other peripheral devices (such as the bill acceptor 37), and orchestrating the lighting and sound emanating from the gaming device 10. In other embodiments where the gaming device 10 is coupled to a network 50, as described below, the microprocessor 40 may have different tasks depending on the setup and function of the gaming device. For example, the microprocessor 40 may be responsible for running the base game of the gaming device and executing instructions received over the network 50 from a bonus server or player tracking server. In a server-based gaming setup, the microprocessor 40 may act as a terminal to execute instructions from a remote server that is running game play on the gaming device.
The microprocessor 40 may be coupled to a machine communication interface (MCI) 42 that connects the gaming device 10 to a gaming network 50. The MCI 42 may be coupled to the microprocessor 40 through a serial connection, a parallel connection, an optical connection, or in some cases a wireless connection. The gaming device 10 may include memory 41 (MEM), such as a random access memory (RAM), coupled to the microprocessor 40 and which can be used to store gaming information, such as storing total coin-in statistics about a present or past gaming session, which can be communicated to a remote server or database through the MCI 42. The MCI 42 may also facilitate communication between the network 50 and the secondary display 25 or a player tracking unit 45 housed in the gaming cabinet 15.
The player tracking unit 45 may include an identification device 46 and one or more buttons 47 associated with the player tracking unit 45. The identification device 46 serves to identify a player, by, for example, reading a player-tracking device, such as a player tracking card that is issued by the casino to individual players who choose to have such a card. The identification device 46 may instead, or additionally, identify players through other methods. Player tracking systems using player tracking cards and card readers 46 are known in the art. Briefly summarizing such a system, a player registers with the casino prior to commencing gaming. The casino issues a unique player-tracking card to the player and opens a corresponding player account that is stored on a server or host computer, described below with reference to
To induce the player to use the card and be an identified player, the casino may award each player points proportional to the money or credits wagered by the player. Players typically accrue points at a rate related to the amount wagered, although other factors may cause the casino to award the player various amounts. The points may be displayed on the secondary display 25 or using other methods. In conventional player tracking systems, the player may take his or her card to a special desk in the casino where a casino employee scans the card to determine how many accrued points are in the player's account. The player may redeem points for selected merchandise, meals in casino restaurants, or the like, which each have assigned point values. In some player tracking systems, the player may use the secondary display 25 to access their player tracking account, such as to check a total number of points, redeem points for various services, make changes to their account, or download promotional credits to the gaming device 10. In other embodiments, the identification device 46 may read other identifying cards (such as driver licenses, credit cards, etc.) to identify a player and match them to a corresponding player tracking account. Although
A player typically plays the gaming device 10 by placing a wager and activating an input mechanism to initiate a game associated with the placed wager. As used herein, a gaming event refers to any activity that affects the calculation or display of a game outcome. Game events include interactions occurring between the gaming device 10, the player, and/or a connected game system. Example gaming events include a player inserting a player account card in a gaming device, a double-pay bonus time period activation, a first spinning reel coming to a stop, a player's input to hold a card in a poker hand, etc. A game refers to the calculation and completion of one game outcome. That is, a game includes a single game cycle that begins with the initiation of the wagered upon game and ends with the completion of all activities relating to the wager placed including any intervening bonuses. In other words, a game encompasses all gaming events dependent on a placed wager during an initiated game including all amounts due the player that are paid directly by the gaming machine, or as a manual payment by casino personnel to the player playing that gaming machine. For example, if an item was awarded as a result of a wager that could be saved and used later, the game would encompass the awarding of the item, which is part of the game outcome, but not the later use of that item since the later use would affect a different game outcome. A game session refers to one or more played games. For example, a game session for a particular player may include each game played on a specific gaming device, each game played between insertions of money or credits, each game played between an initial money or credit insertion and a cash-out or zeroing out of credits, each game played during a casino stay, or each game played over a predetermined time period. Alternatively, game sessions may refer to games played by multiple players over a specified time period or event period with respect to a particular gaming device or group of gaming devices.
The player may initially insert monetary bills or previously printed tickets with a credit value into the bill acceptor 37. The player may also put coins into a coin acceptor (not shown) or a credit, debit or casino account card into a card reader/authorizer (not shown). In other embodiments, stored player points or special ‘bonus points’ awarded to the player or accumulated and/or stored in a player account may be able to be substituted at or transferred to the gaming device 10 for credits or other value. For example, a player may convert stored loyalty points to credits or transfer funds from his bank account, credit card, casino account or other source of funding. The selected source of funding may be selected by the player at time of transfer, determined by the casino at the time of transfer or occur automatically according to a predefined selection process. One of skill in the art will readily see that this invention is useful with all gambling devices, regardless of the manner in which wager value-input is accomplished.
The credit meter 27 displays the numeric credit value of the money or other value inserted, transferred, or stored dependent on the denomination of the gaming device 10. That is, if the gaming device 10 is a nickel slot machine and a 20 bill inserted into the bill acceptor 37, the credit meter will reflect 400 credits or one credit for each nickel of the inserted twenty dollars. For gaming devices 10 that support multiple denominations, the credit meter 27 will reflect the amount of credits relative to the denomination selected. Thus, in the above example, if a penny denomination is selected after the $20 is inserted the credit meter will change from 400 credits to 2000 credits.
A wager may be placed by pushing one or more of the game buttons 32, which may be reflected on the bet meter 28. That is, the player can generally depress a “bet one” button (one of the buttons on the player interface panel 30, such as 32), which transfers one credit from the credit meter 27 to the bet meter 28. Each time the button 32 is depressed an additional single credit transfers to the bet meter 28 up to a maximum bet that can be placed on a single play of the electronic gaming device 10. The game may be initiated by pulling the gaming handle 12 or depressing the spin button 33. On some gaming devices 10, a “max bet” button (another one of the buttons 32 on the player interface panel 30) may be depressed to wager the maximum number of credits supported by the gaming device 10 and initiate a game.
If the game does not result in any winning combination, the process of placing a wager may be repeated by the player. Alternatively, the player may cash out any remaining credits on the credit meter 27 by depressing the “cash-out” button (another button 32 on the player interface panel 30), which causes the credits on the credit meter 27 to be paid out in the form of a ticket through the ticket printer 38, or may be paid out in the form of returning coins from a coin hopper (not shown) to a coin return tray.
If instead a winning combination (win) appears on the display 20, the award corresponding to the winning combination is immediately applied to the credit meter 27. For example, if the gaming device 10 is a slot machine, a winning combination of symbols 23 may land on a played payline on reels 22. If any bonus games are initiated, the gaming device 10 may enter into a bonus mode or simply award the player with a bonus amount of credits that are applied to the credit meter 27.
Referring to
During game play, the spinning reels 22A may be controlled by stepper motors (not shown) under the direction of the microprocessor 40 (
A game on a spinning reel slot machine 10A typically includes the player pressing the “bet-one” button (one of the game buttons 32A) to wager a desired number of credits followed by pulling the gaming handle 12 (
Referring to
Because the virtual spinning reels 22B, by virtue of being computer implemented, can have almost any number of stops on a reel strip, it is much easier to have a greater variety of displayed outcomes as compared to spinning-reel slot machines 10A (
With the possible increases in reel 22B numbers and configurations over the mechanical gaming device 10A, video gaming devices 10B often have multiple paylines 24 that may be played. By having more paylines 24 available to play, the player may be more likely to have a winning combination when the reels 22B stop and the game ends. However, since the player typically must wager at least a minimum number of credits to enable each payline 24 to be eligible for winning, the overall odds of winning are not much different, if at all, than if the player is wagering only on a single payline. For example, in a five line game, the player may bet one credit per payline 24 and be eligible for winning symbol combinations that appear on any of the five played paylines 24. This gives a total of five credits wagered and five possible winning paylines 24. If, on the other hand, the player only wagers one credit on one payline 24, but plays five games, the odds of winning would be identical as above: five credits wagered and five possible winning paylines 24.
Because the video display 20B can easily modify the image output by the video display 20B, bonuses, such as second screen bonuses are relatively easy to award on the video slot game 10B. That is, if a bonus is triggered during game play, the video display 20B may simply store the resulting screen shot in memory and display a bonus sequence on the video display 20B. After the bonus sequence is completed, the video display 20B may then retrieve the previous screen shot and information from memory, and re-display that image.
Also, as mentioned above, the video display 20B may allow various other game information 21B to be displayed. For example, as shown in
Even with the improved flexibility afforded by the video display 20B, several physical buttons 32B and 33B are usually provided on video slot machines 10B. These buttons may include game buttons 32B that allow a player to choose the number of paylines 24 he or she would like to play and the number of credits wagered on each payline 24. In addition, a max bet button (one of the game buttons 32B) allows a player to place a maximum credit wager on the maximum number of available paylines 24 and initiate a game. A repeat bet or spin button 33B may also be used to initiate each game when the max bet button is not used.
Referring to
Although examples of a spinning reel slot machine 10A, a video slot machine 10B, and a video poker machine 10C have been illustrated in
Gaming devices 71 coupled over an optical line 64 may be remote gaming devices in a different location or casino. The optical line 64 may be coupled to the gaming network 50 through an electronic to optical signal converter 63 and may be coupled to the gaming devices 71 through an optical to electronic signal converter 65. The banks of gaming devices 70 coupled to the network 50 may be coupled through a bank controller 60 for compatibility purposes, for local organization and control, or for signal buffering purposes. The network 50 may include serial or parallel signal transmission lines and carry data in accordance with data transfer protocols such as Ethernet transmission lines, Rs-232 lines, firewire lines, USB lines, or other communication protocols. Although not shown in
As mentioned above, each gaming device 70-75 may have an individual processor 40 (
Thus, in some embodiments, the network 50, server 80, and database 90 may be dedicated to communications regarding specific game or tournament play. In other embodiments, however, the network 50, server 80, and database 90 may be part of a player tracking network. For player tracking capabilities, when a player inserts a player tracking card in the card reader 46 (
The various systems described with reference to
Video poker games in casinos typically involve draw poker and simulate the play of a real deck. That is, a gaming device is programmed with a digital rendition of a deck of 52 standard playing cards. Upon making a wager, the game deals the player five cards face up (the “dealt poker hand”). The player may then discard any or all of the five cards and perform a “draw” operation to replace the discards with new ones from the remaining deck to form a “final poker hand.”
The player's goal is to end up with specific card combinations after the draw is completed. Awards are paid if these specific card combinations are achieved according to the paytable of the video poker gaming device. Table A is a typical “Jacks or better” paytable, so called because a pair of any face cards or Aces (Jacks, Queens, Kings, or Aces) repays the wager amount. The award amounts shown in Table A are actually multiplier values used with the value of the original wager. For example, if $1.25 is wagered on a video poker game and a straight flush is struck, the initial bet is paid back at a 50:1 rate or 50 times the wagered amount, giving an award of $62.50.
If a “perfect” player (e.g., a player that always plays according to the best theoretical strategy) gambles on a machine with a paytable like that of Table A, the player will, over time, earn a return of about 99.54% of her total wagers. In other words, if the player gambles $1,000, on average she will win $995.40 in prizes. Of course most players do not always play according to the best theoretical average. This happens when the players are not aware of all of the best card-holding strategies, they are rushing through games and mistakenly hold the wrong cards before drawing, or they feel that a certain outcome is “due” or “lucky” and hold cards according to this feeling rather than according to the best theoretical strategy. Hence, the casinos overall hold percentage and profit from video poker gaming devices is often greater than the theoretical hold percentages. In the short term, players may win much more or much less than the theoretical payback percentage of the gaming machines due to the random nature of the game outcomes. This uncertainty is part of what makes gambling such a compelling past-time. However, when all player wins are averaged together over a relatively long period of time, the total payback percentage of a gaming device using the paytable illustrated in Table A will approach 99.54% or $995.40 for every $1,000 wagered.
Even if most players are not playing “perfectly,” the hold percentage of the video poker gaming device will not be very large. If perfect play is again assumed, and presuming a standard rate of play of 600 hands per hour and a typical $1.25 average wager size, the casino earns only $1.25*600*0.46%=3.75/hour. With less than perfect play, assume that the hold percentage increases to 1.5%, which means that the casino can earn up to $11.25 an hour. This earning number is still relatively low compared to most slot machines, which typically have a faster rate of play for games and much higher hold percentages.
Most casinos cannot justify placing a game on their floor with such a low profit potential and so they modify the paytable. For example, simply by lowering the award for a Full House from 9 to 8 and lowering the award for a Flush from 6 to 5, the minimum house advantage or hold percentage increases from 0.46% to 2.7%, which is over a fivefold increase. Some popular casinos may modify the paytable even further to further increase their profits. Because video poker games typically use a traditional 52 card deck, casinos are generally limited in fluctuating hold percentages by implementing different paytables instead of changing some other aspect of the game play. Thus, unlike slot machines, where players do not generally know what hold percentage the game is set to, players can determine the hold percentage of video poker games from an understanding of the rules and paytable. Even if most players do not calculate out the exact theoretical hold percentage of video poker gaming device, these players typically understand that a 9/6 paytable is more favorable than an 8/5 paytable and are hence more reluctant to play an 8/5 paytable or worse and seek out games with 9/6 paytables.
In most video poker games, a large percentage of total wins are paid by the very low awards. For example, in a jacks or better video poker game, most of the awards include card combinations of pairs with jacks or better, or two pairs. Because these awards are very low, money back on jacks or better and double money on two pair, these hands are sometimes considered boring to play, but essential to winning maximum return.
Embodiments of this concept address these issues by providing a video poker gaming device that utilizes rapid play so that a high paying (low hold percentage) paytable can be utilized while emphasizing larger wins and increasing profits for the casino. Although, a standard game of jacks or better video poker is illustrated in Table A and discussed in the embodiments below, one of skill in the art will readily appreciate other embodiments of this concept can be used with any paytable or any other draw poker game such as “Deuces Wild” “Bonus Poker” or any other draw poker configurations.
Referring to
In operation, the player of gaming device 100 is dealt five cards. An additional five cards are selected and held in secret. These cards are the replacement or “draw” cards, which are substituted for any of the initial deal cards the player chooses to discard. In some embodiments, the additional five cards are ordered in that first selected draw card is used to replace the card of the first (leftmost) discarded position; the second draw card replaces the next discarded position, etc. Of course, if only one card is discarded, only the first draw or secret card is used and the others are never played as part of the game. In other embodiments of this invention cards may be ordered in any manner, or a player may choose which of the cards is substituted for each discard.
Once the five dealt cards (visible to the player) and the five hidden draw cards are selected and held secret from the player, the gaming device 100 inspects all ten cards to determine if a combination of the ten cards meets a predefined criterion. In some embodiments, the gaming device 100 determines if any winning card combinations are possible from the ten cards using a best theoretical strategy (perfect play). Here, the predefined criterion is any win; that is, any card combination associated with an award. To accomplish this determination, the gaming device 100 may analyze or evaluate the possible card combinations arising from holding and drawing cards using at least the best theoretical strategy and determining if any potential awards are associated with these card combinations. In some embodiments, the gaming device may make the analysis of which cards to hold and draw using more than one strategy. For example, a strategy that emphasizes holding all dealt face cards may also be used when analyzing possible card combinations since some newer players tend to hold a lot of face cards in the hope of receiving a pair of jacks or better.
As games are typically implemented with fast microcomputers, this evaluation is accomplished in a very brief time—perhaps a few milliseconds or less. In the above example, if the evaluation shows that no win is possible (or only wins below a predefined criterion or designated threshold), the gaming device will display a non-preferred game sequence. This non-preferred game sequence may include displaying the dealt cards for a relatively short amount of time and then automatically discarding some or all of the dealt cards and displaying a final hand. In some embodiments another poker game may be automatically initiated as described in the '633 application following the non-preferred game sequence.
In other embodiments, the non-preferred game sequence may include displaying the dealt hand and revealing the draw cards above the dealt hand. In still other embodiments, the non-preferred game sequence may include simply deducing the wager from the credit meter of the gaming device. Here, no cards are displayed to the player during the non-preferred game sequence. In embodiments where the predefined criterion is a minimum threshold award value over a certain number, analyses of card combinations that form winning hands with an award less than the minimum threshold value may have a non-preferred game sequence of displaying the dealt hand, automatically holding cards according to the best theoretical strategy or other strategy being used, and automatically drawing cards so as to display a final hand with the winning card combination. The gaming device 100 may also show the award value briefly and roll up the credit meter with the awarded credits. As discussed above, a second poker game may automatically be initiated as soon as the non-preferred game sequence is displayed.
As discussed in the embodiments above, the analysis of the possible card combinations may use one or more predefined strategies with the knowledge of all possible cards for that game, i.e., the dealt cards and the secret draw cards. However, in other embodiments, different algorithms may be used: for example, analysis could be made with full or partial evaluation of the hidden deal cards. As one of skill in the art will appreciate, any algorithm for evaluating the possible card hands is useful with this concept. With any of these algorithms, when the analysis determines that the card combinations do not satisfy the predefined criterion, the entire poker game may be played much faster than a conventional video poker game. In embodiments that utilize an automated deal and draw of a poker hand, entire poker game takes only 0.25 seconds, though the process can operate more quickly or more slowly in other embodiments.
If, on the other hand, the analysis determines that a card combination satisfies the predetermined criterion, the gaming device 100 displays the dealt poker hand and allows the player to choose which cards to hold and which ones to discard. Once the player makes her hold selection, the discarded cards are replaced with the hidden draw cards in the designated order. If a win results, the player is paid according to the paytable of the game, such as the one shown in Table A. In some embodiments, a second poker game may again be automatically initiated following the display of the final hand and presentation of the credit award as described in the '633 application. In other embodiments, the gaming device 100 may wait for further player input after displaying the final poker hand and presenting the awarded credits.
As a result of the just-described process, games which result in losses or small wins are played very quickly. Only games with potential wins equal to, or above, the designated threshold specified by the predefined criterion are played by players and this play occurs at normal speed. Because losses and small wins are a very large portion of all game outcomes, however, overall game speed is significantly increased and players are not burdened with playing out hands with small or no win possibilities.
In the just-described process player are only presented with games to play that have a chance at having a winning outcome that meets the predefined criterion. However, this does not mean the player will necessarily win because the player still must make decisions as to which cards to hold and discard. Thus, depending on the choices made, the player may still lose or not win the maximum possible amount. In other embodiments, however, the player may be given at least partial information about the possible wins available. For example, the game could inform the player that a maximum win of Four of a Kind is possible. Or the player could be informed that the lowest winning combination is Three of a Kind. In other words, the player could be told of the maximum or minimum winning possibilities. In another embodiment, the player could be told of all the possible winning combinations or a subset of the possible winning combinations. In yet another embodiment, the player could be shown one or more cards in the draw pool. Such disclosures may be used to heighten the entertainment value of a game, but that information can also improve the likelihood that the player will achieve a final poker hand with at least one of the card combinations associated with an award greater than the predefined threshold amount.
One of skill in the art of draw poker design will understand that these “tips” or extra game information increases the odds of winning and hence will alter the theoretical payback percentage of the gaming device. To offset this increase, the paytable values may be changed or another aspect of the game may be altered. All techniques relating to the varied embodiments disclosed herein and all of the possible combinations thereof are within the scope of this inventive concept.
In another embodiment, disclosure of possible outcomes or the identity of one or more draw cards can be offered for an additional wager, whether of cash, player loyalty points, or other consideration. In another embodiment disclosure of possible outcomes may reduce the award value of the paytable for that game. In yet another embodiment, such disclosure may vary by time of day, day of week, initial wager size, player identity, total play by the player and other parameters, either alone or in any combination. Further, disclosure may be made automatically or only when selected by the player.
In another embodiment of the invention, the gaming device may offer players the opportunity to play games when the analysis determines that a certain possibility of winning or simply an estimated probability of winning is above a predefined threshold amount. Similarly, this determination may be made by evaluating one or more of the dealt cards, one or more of the draw cards, or any combination thereof.
In another embodiment of the invention, hands presented to the player for play may include a “buy-out” offer in return for the player surrendering his hand and its potential win. For example, the player may be offered a flat payment of 5× his wager to surrender his cards. As another example, the buyout amount could vary, either randomly or in proportion to the value of the potential win, or in proportion to any other variable, such as player identity, etc. The buy-out offer may be made prior to dealing the first set of cards or may be made after the dealt hand is displayed to the player. These buy-out offers may increase the speed of the game and provide another level of intrigue for seasoned video poker players. The buy-out offer feature may also be opted-out of by players that would rather play a more traditional poker game. In some embodiments, if the player chooses to accept the buy-out offer, the deal and/or draw cards may be displayed to the player to show them what they would have received had they not accepted the offer. A best final hand may also be highlighted from the revealed cards or otherwise displayed.
By implementing embodiments of this concept, player enjoyment may increase since game play is focused on winning or otherwise positive poker hands while losing hands and small win hands do not have to be played. In addition, the speed of game play can be greatly increased because games with losing hands and hands with small wins are completed at a much faster rate through the non-preferred game sequences.
For example, if only games with possible wins of Three of a Kind or better are offered to players, the player will only be offered one game out of every approximately 7 hands played. If each losing or small win game requires ¼ second of time, and the one game offered to the player requires 6 seconds of time, the average game time is (6*0.25+6)/7=1.07 seconds per game; nearly 6 times faster than the 6 seconds per hand of traditional video draw poker.
Because game play is 6 times faster, the casino makes more money per hour on a given hold percentage. For example, the 6/9 draw poker, which is desirable from a player perspective, can now earn about 6 times as much per hour of player wagering. That is, instead of earning about $3.75 per hour, the casino earns an amount closer to $22.50/hour. Since overall game speed is partially determined by how quickly the player starts each subsequent game, even faster game play can be accomplished by utilizing embodiments where a second or subsequent poker game is initiated immediately following the completion of the prior game for so long as credits remain to fund play. As described in the '633 application, the wager size of the prior game may be repeated in each subsequent game. The player may be able to pause or stop this automated play at any time by pressing a designated button.
In other embodiments a delay is placed after each automatically completed game before the next game starts, and another delay, equal or different to the first delay period, is placed after each player-completed game before the next game is restarted. In some of these embodiments the amount of the delay varies according to the prior game outcome. For example, the delay time depends upon the amount won. Here, the delay time may correspond to the time it takes to roll up the awarded credits on the credit meter.
In other embodiments, a new game is initiated almost instantly after completion of each losing or small win hand that is played by the game itself, but is not initiated following a player-completed game. As described in the '633 application, this win seeking embodiment allows player to quickly move through losing and low paying games while being able to savor the higher paying games. Here, the player must restart game play after playing a potentially larger winning poker game by pressing a designated button, such as the rapid player poker button 134 or the deal/draw button 133.
In another embodiment, the player is provided the ability to select between playing a standard video poker game, that is a poker game in which no games are automatically played, and the rapid play poker mode. Referring again to
In another embodiment, the player may select the award level of wins used as the threshold value for the predefined criteria in determining which poker games are to be automatically played. In another embodiment, the player may choose how quickly each automatically played game is completed, and/or how long the delay is between the time one game is completed and the next game begins. In order to incentivize the player to play rapidly, the paytable could vary according to how fast the games are played. For example, poker games initiated using the rapid play poker button 134 may utilize a higher paying paytable (e.g., a 6/9 paytable for jacks or better poker) than a paytable used for a poker game initiated using the single game deal/draw button 133 (e.g., a 5/8 paytable for jacks or better poker). Additionally, higher paying paytables may be used when the player selects a minimal inserted delay between games. Further, higher awards may be available when a longer series of games is played in rapid play poker mode. These awards may be progressive in nature such that they increase the longer rapid play poker is used and are reset if a conventional poker mode is used, or the player leaves the gaming device 100.
Referring to
If the gaming device does determine that a combination of the selected cards meets the predefined criterion in process (208), the gaming device displays the first five selected cards as the dealt poker hand in process (210). At this point, the player is allowed to hold any of the dealt cards if desired and to draw additional cards from the secret draw cards to replace any cards that are not held in the dealt hand in process (212). The draw cards, if any, replace the discarded cards after the draw and a final poker hand is displayed to the player in process (214). If the player has won an award associated with the final poker hand, the player may also receive the award in conjunction with the display of the final poker hand.
Although flow 200 specifies that all of the cards are selected and analyzed prior to displaying anything to a player, other embodiments include different orders of these steps. For example, other embodiments of the invention provide for dealing the first five selected cards as a dealt poker hand before selecting the draw cards and analyzing the dealt and draw cards to determine if these sets of cards include an combination that meets the predefined criterion.
Referring to
In other embodiments, the player may select which of the displayed draw cards 322 they would like to reveal. That is the player may select which ones among the unrevealed draw cards they would like to complete their final poker hand. In some of these embodiments, the identify of each unrevealed draw card is assigned prior to allowing the player to select among the draw cards 322. In these scenarios, the player's selections will have an impact on the final poker hand. In other ones of these embodiments, the cards will be sequentially revealed according to a predetermined script. That is, no matter which draw card the player selects first, it will be identified according to the first card of the predetermined script sequence.
Referring to
Referring now to
As noted above, the revealed draw card may have changed the player's strategy in holding cards from the dealt hand. That is, without knowing that one of the draw cards 322 was another suited 3 card, the player may have elected to only hold the two aces and drawn three cards from the draw cards 322. Thus, by revealing one of the draw cards 322, the gaming device is not only giving away information about the identity of one of the draw cards, but is also telling the player one of the possible winning card combinations (here, two pairs).
In some embodiments, the player may choose one of the draw cards 322 to be revealed in a tip or hint. In other embodiments, the gaming device 300 may automatically choose one of the draw cards 322 to reveal. The gaming device 300 may make this choice randomly or may take into account the possible card combinations when deciding which of the draw cards 322 to reveal. As discussed above, this reveal may be done in response to an additional payment by the player, in response to a game event, or just randomly during a game session.
Referring to
Referring to
In operation, games that result in losing poker hands have the hands transferred to the historical losing hand display 450. For example, a game that results in a losing hand may have the losing hand transferred to the bottom of the historical losing hand display 450 thereby shifting each of the other losing hands shown in the historical losing hand display 450 up and eliminating the topmost displayed losing hand if it has neared the top of the display 420. Similarly, games that result in winning poker hands have the hands transferred to the historical winning hand display 460.
In some embodiments where the game device analyzes whether the dealt cards and the draw cards result in a possible winning hand or otherwise meets a predefined criterion, the dealt cards may be briefly displayed to the player, the draw cards are revealed, the losing hand is automatically transferred to the historical losing hand display 450, and a subsequent game is initiated. In the same embodiments, the game device may display the dealt cards and allow the player to hold and draw cards when the analysis determines that the dealt cards and draw cards can result in a winning hand or otherwise meets a predefined criterion. If the player chooses to hold and draw cards such that the resulting final poker hand is a winning poker hand, the poker hand is transferred to the historical winning hand display 460 and the gaming device waits for the player to initiate a subsequent game. Here, the player only plays hands that have a chance of being winning hands (or otherwise meeting a predefined criterion) and the player is able to observe the recent winning and losing hands.
In alternate embodiments, the gaming device may continue to briefly display losing hands until an advance game information analysis indicates that a hand is a possible winning hand or a predefined event occurs. Here, the predefined event includes a particular number of games passing without the player playing a hand. That is, if a player only plays hands that have a potential winning outcome, the player may try to second guess themselves when finally being allowed to play a hand. For example, a player may receive a draw of three spades and a pair of threes. Normally, the player playing the best possible strategy would hold the pair of threes in the hopes of receiving a third three or another pair of cards. However, the player may remember past games where when confronted with a similar situation, the possible winning hand used a strategy of holding the three matching suit cards or even holding a lone eight card that was included in a winning straight. This possible conundrum occurs when the analysis only indicates that a winning hand is possible. The winning hand may be reached using a best theoretical strategy or it may have nothing to do with the best theoretical strategy. If a player uses the best theoretical strategy, but does not receive a winning hand when they do get a chance to play, they may second guess their strategy and just go for the larger win. Thus, in the above example, the player may hold the three spade cards and hope for a higher paying flush.
These embodiments, however, also pause the automatic re-initiation of games to allow the player to play hand based on predefined events. These predefined events may include a predefined or random number of losing games occurring, a predefined amount of time passing, or other metrics. Here, the player may not be sure whether the game has allowed them to play a hand because it is a possible winning hand or because the predefined event paused game play to allow player interaction. This may make the game more interesting while still allowing for a faster rate of overall game play speed. In other embodiments, as described in the '633 application, the player may pause the re-initiation of games at any time by pressing a game button or a separate pause button.
In yet another embodiment, the gaming device may analyze the dealt and draw cards to determine if a winning hand is possible, discarding the cards completely if they do not result in a possible winning hand, and continuing to analyze new sets of dealt and draw cards until a possible winning hand is found among the analyzed cards before ever showing the dealt cards to the player. In essence, these embodiments allow a player to play only hands that have one or more possible winning card combinations. Since the player does not have to wager on each of the discarded hands the game paytable must be adjusted to maintain a proper hold percentage for the casino. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways. For example, the award values of the winning hands may be reduced or the player may have to wager more to enjoy the standard paytable amount. For example, a player may have to place a wager of five credits to enjoy the 9/6 paytable shown above in Table A. Here, a hand that results in a pair of face cards or aces will only “win” one credit on a five credit wager.
Referring to
In embodiments that only allow a player to play poker hands with a possible winning combination, or that only display poker hands with a possible winning combination, this hint activation may greatly help the player choose a hold and draw strategy to find the possible winning hand. In embodiments that allow a player to play hands with no possible winning combination, activation of the hint button when no win is possible may simply tell the player that no win is possible. In other embodiments, however, when the player uses the hint button and no winning card combination is possible, the gaming device may allow the player to surrender their hand and receive a portion of their wager back (e.g., half their wager is returned) without holding or drawing for additional cards.
In some embodiments, the player may have to “buy” the use of the hint. That is, by activating the hint button 538 the player is spending some additional credits. The hint button may cost a predefined number of credits, or the use of the hint button may reduce any winnings by a certain number of credits or a percentage of the win. In one example, the use of the hint button may cost the equivalent of whatever the wager on the game is. Thus, if the player has wagered three credits on the poker hand, the use of the hint button will cost an additional three credits. In a second example, the use of the hint button may reduce any win by two credits. Thus, if the player uses the hint button 538 and receives a winning pair or two pairs, the player does not win anything. Additionally, if the player receives a flush, the player will only win four credits instead of six. However, if the hint only indicates that no win is possible, the player does not have to pay any additional credits.
In alternate embodiments, the player may have to “earn” hints based on their game play or a casino promotion. The “hints” may be stored and used at a later time or date. For example, a player may earn the use of a hint after reaching a threshold of $500 of credits wagered (coin-in) or after a streak of ten losing hands. A casino may give away a ticket that can be inserted into a gaming device and used to activate a hint as a promotion for new players. The casino may also credit a player's account with a “hint” that can be downloaded and used after the player has identified herself to a gaming device that allows the use of hints.
Some embodiments of the invention have been described above, and in addition, some specific details are shown for purposes of illustrating the inventive principles. However, numerous other arrangements may be devised in accordance with the inventive principles of this patent disclosure. Further, well known processes have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the invention. Thus, while the invention is described in conjunction with the specific embodiments illustrated in the drawings, it is not limited to these embodiments or drawings. Rather, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents that come within the scope and spirit of the inventive principles set out in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/967,571, filed Dec. 14, 2105, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/630,752, filed Dec. 3, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,240,094 issued Jan. 19, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety. The priority application is commonly assigned with U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/630,767 (“the '767 application”), now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,684,811, to John F. Acres, filed Dec. 3, 2009, for GAMING DEVICE HAVING ADVANCE GAME INFORMATION ANALYZER. The disclosure of the above-listed application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/187,639, filed Feb. 24, 2014, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,165,435, on Oct. 20, 2015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/874,894, filed on Oct. 5, 2015, both claim priority from the 767 application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2669389 | Mesi et al. | Feb 1954 | A |
| 3124355 | Mentzer | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3124674 | Edwards | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3684290 | Wayne | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3727213 | Kurtenbach | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3751040 | Carey | Aug 1973 | A |
| 4240635 | Brown | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4254404 | White | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4283709 | Lucero et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4433844 | Hooker et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4620707 | Lippincott | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4624459 | Kaufman | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4652998 | Koza et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4657256 | Okada | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4712799 | Fraley | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4836546 | DiRe et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4837728 | Barrie et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4887813 | Chiles, III et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4911449 | Dickinson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5022653 | Suttle et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5024439 | Okada | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5026058 | Bromley | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027102 | Sweeny | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5031914 | Rosenthal | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5033744 | Bridgeman et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5046736 | Bridgeman et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5078405 | Jones et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5123649 | Tiberio | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5152529 | Okada | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5178395 | Lovell | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5221083 | Dote | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5265880 | Maksymec | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5342049 | Wichinsky et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5364104 | Jones et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5377973 | Jones et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380008 | Mathis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5490670 | Hobert | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5536016 | Thompson | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5560603 | Seelig et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5564700 | Celona | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5584485 | Jones et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586766 | Forte et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5655961 | Acres et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655965 | Takemoto et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5674128 | Holch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5695402 | Stupak | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5697844 | Kohom | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704835 | Dietz | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5720662 | Holmes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5743798 | Adams et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5758875 | Giacalone, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766076 | Pease et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5816918 | Kelly et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828862 | Singkomrat et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830064 | Bradish et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836816 | Bruin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836817 | Acres et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851147 | Stupak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5910048 | Feinberg | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913726 | Jones et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5934998 | Forte et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941770 | Miers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5960406 | Rasansky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5984779 | Bridgeman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6003013 | Boushy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012983 | Walker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6024642 | Stupak | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030109 | Lobsenz | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032955 | Luciano et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045129 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045130 | Jones et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048272 | Tsujita | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059659 | Busch et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077163 | Walker et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086477 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6106395 | Begis | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110041 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110043 | Olsen | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6135884 | Hedrick et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146273 | Olsen | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165071 | Weiss | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168521 | Luciano et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183362 | Boushy | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6186892 | Frank et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6186893 | Walker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196918 | Miers et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203429 | Demar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210276 | Mullins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217448 | Olsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224482 | Bennett | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6234900 | Cumbers | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6254483 | Acres | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264560 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270409 | Shuster | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287194 | Okada et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293866 | Walker et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293868 | Bernard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6302793 | Fertitta, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315662 | Jorasch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6315666 | Mastera et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319122 | Packes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319125 | Acres | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6336859 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
| 6347996 | Gilmore et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6364314 | Canterbury | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368216 | Hedrick et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6371852 | Acres | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375567 | Acres | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6390473 | Vancura et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6425823 | Byrne | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428002 | Baranauskas | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443456 | Gajor | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454648 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457045 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6471588 | Sakamoto | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6485367 | Joshi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485368 | Jones et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6520856 | Walker et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6558255 | Walker et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565434 | Acres | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565436 | Baerlocher | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569013 | Taylor | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575832 | Manfredi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6592457 | Frohm et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599186 | Walker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599193 | Baerlocher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6606615 | Jennings et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6620046 | Rowe | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6634922 | Driscoll et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6648757 | Slomiany et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652378 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6656047 | Tarantino et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6695700 | Walker et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697165 | Wakai et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6702670 | Jasper et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6709331 | Berman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712693 | Hettinger | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712695 | Mothwurf et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722985 | Criss-Puszkiewicz et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6739973 | Lucchesi | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6749510 | Giobbi | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6751657 | Zothner | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6755420 | Colton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6758754 | Lavanchy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6760595 | Inselberg | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6780104 | Fox | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786824 | Cannon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800026 | Cannon | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6800027 | Giobbi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6802778 | Lemay et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6811482 | Letovsky | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6811486 | Luciano, Jr. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6860808 | Levitan | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6860810 | Cannon et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878064 | Huang | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6939227 | Jorasch et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6939229 | McCllntic | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6944509 | Altmaier et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6948171 | Dan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6965868 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6973665 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| RE38982 | Forte et al. | Feb 2006 | E |
| 6997380 | Safaei et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6998806 | Suzuki | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7037195 | Schneider et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056210 | Bansemer et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7059604 | Richards | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069232 | Fox et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7090579 | Tarantino | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7094149 | Walker et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7094150 | Ungaro et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103560 | Fox et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7105736 | Laakso | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7125333 | Brosnan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7131908 | Baerlocher | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7144322 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7160188 | Kaminkow et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7160189 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7169052 | Beaulieu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7175521 | McClintic | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7182690 | Giobbi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184965 | Fox et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7186181 | Rowe | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7192346 | Mathis | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7195243 | Kenny et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7201654 | Jarvis et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7210998 | Kazaoka et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7251805 | Koo | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7258613 | Lucchesi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264243 | Yoseloff et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7300351 | Thomas | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7303475 | Britt et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7329185 | Conover et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7338372 | Morrow et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7355112 | Laakso | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361089 | Daly et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7374486 | Baerlocher | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7410422 | Fine | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7416186 | Walker et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7458892 | Walker et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7585222 | Muir | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594849 | Cannon | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594851 | Falconer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7601060 | Baerlocher et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7628691 | Luciano et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7674180 | Graham et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7699703 | Muir et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7717788 | Rowe | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7765121 | Pace et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7775876 | Rowe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7780520 | Baerlocher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7806761 | Walker et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7811167 | Giobbi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7846018 | Baerlocher | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7874911 | Walker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7963844 | Walker et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7980934 | Shuster et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8047908 | Walker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8052517 | Manfredi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8057294 | Pacey et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8070582 | Lutnick et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8186682 | Amaitis et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8197324 | Walker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8475254 | Acres | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506394 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8523652 | Luciano, Jr. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8657662 | Acres | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8678914 | Young | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8684811 | Acres | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702490 | Acres | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8758109 | Lutnick | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 9165435 | Acres | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9240094 | Acres | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9251671 | Acres | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9430903 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9472064 | Acres | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9483909 | Acres | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9659429 | Acres | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9916722 | Acres | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9953490 | Acres | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 20010004609 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024015 | Hogan et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010046893 | Giobbi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048193 | Yoseloff et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049298 | Bennett | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013173 | Walker et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016202 | Fertitta et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020019253 | Reitzen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032052 | Levitan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034981 | Hisada et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020039923 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055381 | Tarantino | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082076 | Roser et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086726 | Ainsworth | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094855 | Berman | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103018 | Rommerdahl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107072 | Giobbi | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123376 | Walker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132664 | Miller et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142815 | Candelore | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142825 | Lark et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143652 | Beckett | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147040 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147043 | Shulman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152120 | Howington | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167126 | De Raedt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177480 | Rowe | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177483 | Cannon | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187834 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193162 | Walker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003989 | Johnson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030013512 | Rowe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017865 | Beaulieu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017867 | deKeller | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032474 | Kaminkow | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036425 | Kaminkow | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054878 | Benoy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054881 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060276 | Walker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064769 | Muir | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064771 | Morrow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067116 | Colton | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078101 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083943 | Adams et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087685 | Hogan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090063 | Jarvis | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092484 | Schneider et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100360 | Manfredi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114217 | Walker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119575 | Centouri et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119576 | McClintic et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130042 | Ollins | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135304 | Sroub et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137109 | Vancura | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144048 | Silva | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030178774 | Marcilio | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030186733 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187736 | Teague et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190944 | Manfredi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195029 | Frohm et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199292 | Greenburg | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199295 | Vancura | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199312 | Walker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204474 | Capek et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207711 | Rowe | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209853 | Harris | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211884 | Gauselmann | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216169 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220138 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220139 | Peterson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220143 | Shteyn et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228901 | Walker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232640 | Walker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030234489 | Okada | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236110 | Beaulieu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002388 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040009808 | Gauselmann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023715 | Luciano | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038735 | Steil et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038736 | Bryant et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048650 | Mierau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048655 | Yoshioka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053657 | Fiden et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053681 | Jordan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063484 | Dreaper et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072609 | Ungaro et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103013 | Jameson | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121833 | Mezen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142742 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158536 | Kowal et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166922 | Michaelson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166940 | Rothschild | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176156 | Walker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180722 | Giobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198485 | Loose et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203611 | Laporta et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204213 | Schugar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204216 | Schugar | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204222 | Roberts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214637 | Nonaka | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219967 | Giobbi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224750 | Al-Ziyoud | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229671 | Stronach et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229683 | Mothwurf et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229700 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235542 | Stronach et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248642 | Rothschild | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254010 | Fine | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266517 | Bleich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050014558 | Estey | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026674 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043072 | Nelson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043088 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043092 | Gauselmann | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043094 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049028 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054438 | Rothschild et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059467 | Saffari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070356 | Mothwurf et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075164 | Krynicky | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096121 | Gilliland et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096124 | Stronach | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101375 | Webb et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101379 | Falconer | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119052 | Russell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124411 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124415 | Centouri et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148380 | Cannon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148383 | Mayeroff | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050153773 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050164764 | Ghaly | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181851 | Amaitis et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181856 | Cannon et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181860 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181862 | Asher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187014 | Saffari et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215311 | Hornik et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215314 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215316 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208995 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227760 | Viazny et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233794 | Cannon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239541 | Jorasch et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239545 | Rowe | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251440 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255902 | Lind | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266905 | Emori et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282613 | Pryzby | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009284 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025205 | Casey et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025206 | Walker et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025207 | Walker et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025210 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030400 | Mathis | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040723 | Baerlocher et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040730 | Walker et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046830 | Webb | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046835 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052153 | Viazny et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052160 | Saffari et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058095 | Berman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058097 | Berman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068898 | Maya | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068899 | B-Jensen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068903 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073872 | B-Jensen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073887 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079310 | Friedman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079314 | Walker et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084496 | Jaffe et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094493 | Kido | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100009 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105836 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116201 | Gauselmann | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121972 | Walker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128467 | Thomas | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135249 | Seelig et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148559 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149632 | Register et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154714 | Montross et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160598 | Wells et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160610 | Potts | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174270 | Westberg et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183530 | Ellis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183536 | Gagner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199631 | McGill et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205468 | Saffari et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211486 | Walker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211496 | Manz | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217175 | Walker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229127 | Walker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237905 | Nicely et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240890 | Walker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247031 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247034 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247041 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252510 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252512 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252519 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258422 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258425 | Edidin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258432 | Packer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287034 | Englman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287045 | Walker et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287075 | Walker et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287098 | Morrow et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287102 | White et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001396 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010309 | Giobbi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010315 | Hein | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070015564 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021202 | Matsumoto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049369 | Kuhn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050256 | Walker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060252 | Taylor | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060254 | Muir | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060274 | Rowe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060295 | DeMar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060323 | Isaac et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060334 | Rowe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060387 | Enzminger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066377 | Asdale | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087822 | Van Luchene | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105612 | Fotevski | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105615 | Lind | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105618 | Steil | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106553 | Jordan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111772 | Shuster et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111776 | Griswold et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112609 | Howard et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117619 | Walker et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117623 | Nelson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129147 | Gagner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135214 | Walker et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143156 | van Deursen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167210 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180371 | Kammler | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184896 | Dickerson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191087 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197247 | Inselberg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205556 | Roemer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218974 | Patel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254732 | Walker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259709 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275777 | Walker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281775 | Kashima | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293292 | Gipp et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298874 | Baerlocher et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004101 | Hein | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015004 | Gatto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026826 | Groswirt | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039190 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080058105 | Combs et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064495 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070695 | Baerlocher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076576 | Graham et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080090651 | Baerlocher | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080096632 | Okada | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080096636 | Power | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102921 | Urquhart | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102935 | Finnimore | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102946 | Amour | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108401 | Baerlocher et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113749 | Williams et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113777 | Vallejo | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113779 | Cregan | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113811 | Linard et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080132320 | Rodgers | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080132328 | Yoshioka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139274 | Baerlocher | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139305 | Vallejo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146331 | Nordman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146344 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080153564 | Baerlocher et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080153580 | Beadell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161085 | Hansen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161099 | Sines et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080171586 | Roemer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176647 | Acres | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182655 | DeWaal et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207313 | Acres | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214286 | Lutnick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220852 | Olive | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220861 | Okada | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234035 | Malek | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080242394 | Sakuma | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080242398 | Harris et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248851 | Bloom | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254886 | Kelly | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261699 | Topham et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268959 | Bryson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280674 | Sakuma | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287186 | Sakuma | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293467 | Mathis | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318656 | Walker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318686 | Crowder | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005170 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2009 | A9 |
| 20090036202 | Baerlocher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042652 | Baerlocher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048012 | Patel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070081 | Saenz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075712 | Englman | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075728 | Acres | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088239 | Iddings et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117981 | Yoshizawa | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124327 | Caputo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124364 | Cuddy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131134 | Baerlocher et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131175 | Kelly et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137312 | Walker et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170608 | Herrmann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176580 | Herrmann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189351 | Baerlocher et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090233682 | Kato et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239601 | Macke | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239622 | Fujimori et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239628 | Fujimori et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090247284 | Sigiyama et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253477 | Teranishi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253478 | Walker et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253490 | Teranishi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090270168 | Englman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275389 | Englman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286590 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325669 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325670 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100016055 | Englman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100041464 | Arezina et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048286 | Okada et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056241 | Acres | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056248 | Acres | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100075741 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105454 | Weber et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105466 | Inamura et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113130 | Kamano et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100124981 | Kato et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130280 | Arezina et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197384 | Wright | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197389 | Ueda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234089 | Saffari et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285867 | Okada | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304834 | Okada | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110021259 | Acres | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039615 | Acres et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053675 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110081958 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110081964 | Acres | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111836 | Acres | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110117987 | Aoki et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110165938 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183753 | Acres et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218030 | Acres | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223983 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110275438 | Hardy et al. | Nov 2011 | A9 |
| 20110281632 | Okada | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110287826 | Kato et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294563 | Jaffe | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120077565 | Barbalet | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115566 | Fujisawa et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172108 | Acres | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172130 | Acres | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120190425 | Barbalet | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120190426 | Acres | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130331172 | Olsen | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331967 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140080565 | Pececnik | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094256 | Hilbert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106858 | Constable et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148230 | Gause et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20160098902 | Acres | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20170011584 | Acres | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170032627 | Acres | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170228961 | Acres | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20180151031 | Acres | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180158273 | Acres | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 442 442 | Oct 1998 | CA |
| 0 141 264 | May 1985 | EP |
| 896304 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 896308 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 919965 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 981397 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1091789 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1 170 041 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1231577 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1351180 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1369830 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1490849 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1496419 | Jan 2005 | EP |
| 1623375 | Feb 2006 | EP |
| 1637196 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1832952 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 1 938 872 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2-21883 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 9521665 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| 9531262 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 9635490 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| 9746293 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 0017825 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| 0032286 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0064545 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0136059 | May 2001 | WO |
| 0159680 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0180961 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 03066179 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 03089092 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2005029279 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005029287 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005099845 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2005099841 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2005113093 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006014745 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006014770 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006014990 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006032498 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006036948 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2006055518 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006060442 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006060493 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006104731 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006121663 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2006135608 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007087286 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2008024556 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008024556 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008024705 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008027429 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Acres, John, Measuring the Player Experience: What a Squiggly Line Can Tell You, Inside Edge / Slot Manager, Jan.-Feb. 2009, pp. 28-29. |
| Acres, John, The Future of Gaming, Where Will You be in 10 Years?, Slot Operations Management / Casino Enterprise Management, Jul. 2007, pp. 8-10, 12. |
| “White Paper: An Analysis of Harrah's Total Rewards Players Rewards Program” written and published by Gaming Market Advisor on or before Dec. 31, 2006, retrieved from URL <http://www.gamingmarketadvisors.com/publications/Harrahs%20Total%20Rewards%20White%20Paper.pdf>, 41 pages. |
| Acres, John, An Ingenious Internet Marketing Tool, Slot Operations Management / Casino Enterprise Management, Aug. 2007, pp. 8-10. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180211492 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14967571 | Dec 2015 | US |
| Child | 15924593 | US | |
| Parent | 12630752 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 14967571 | US |
