The present subject matter relates to marine barriers and movable gates. The present disclosure has particular applicability to marine barriers for arresting the motion of a vessel impacting the barrier.
Structures for use on both land and/or water as security barrier systems have been previously developed. Such structures generally intend to stop intruding objects, and range from thick, solid walls blocking the object's progress to secured areas for disabling the propelling mechanism of the object. These structures commonly exhibit noticeable shortcomings. First, these structures are often cumbersome and time-consuming to install and erect as and where desired. Second, they are difficult, or even impossible, to maintain and/or repair after they have sustained the impact of an intruding object. Third, they are often not adaptable to different needs and conditions.
One solution providing an improved marine barrier is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,920,075, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The marine barrier of the '075 patent includes two continuous pleated rows of first and second respective pluralities of buoyant panels, to form a diamond-shaped barrier. A plurality of hinges elastically connect opposing sides of adjacent panels with an included angle therebetween to form two continuous pleated rows, and the hinges are arranged in first, second, and third substantially parallel rows. A first plurality of impact cables (or an impact net) are attached to opposing ends of the first pleated row of panels and pass through each of the hinges in the first row of hinges. A second plurality of impact cables (or an impact net) are attached to opposing ends of the second pleated row of panels and pass through each of the hinges in the third row of hinges. When the barrier is floating in water and a moving vessel impacts the first or second plurality of impact cables, those impact cables deflect to transfer a force of the impact to one or more of the panels, which in turn engage the water to transfer the force of the impact to the water, to arrest the motion of the vessel. In other words, during an impact the panels are drawn in around the point of impact and engage the water to dissipate the impact force.
The marine barrier of the '075 patent is a vast improvement over previous barriers, but is designed to be a permanent structure, and is designed to have a very high level of effectiveness. Consequently, it may be unnecessarily large, heavy, and/or costly for temporary applications, for deployment in remote areas, or for lower-performance applications that do not require its effectiveness or its built-in redundancies.
In another type of barrier intended to be simpler and lower-cost, a single impact net is strung between central columns in what is referred to as a “single net capture mechanism,” in contrast to the two-net capture mechanism of the '075 patent, which has a set of impact nets or cables attached to each of the front and rear faces of the barrier. A single net capture system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,683,342, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The marine barrier 200 of the '342 patent, one embodiment of which is shown in FIGS. 8a-b, includes a series of central columns 205 arranged in a line, which support an impact net 210 strung between them. As best seen in FIG. 8b, the central substantially vertical columns 205 are joined to each other and supported in the water by frames, each having a lower horizontal leg 220 attached to a lower portion of the column 205 and a diagonal strut 225 also attached to the column 205. Each leg includes a float 230. The legs 220 and floats 230 are arranged such that a distal end of each of the legs 220 is attachable to a distal end of a corresponding leg 220 of an adjacent column 205 to form a series of diamond-shaped supports between the columns 205, to support the columns 205 and the impact net 210 when the barrier 200 is floating in a body of water. The combination of a column 205 and four frames 215 is referred to hereinafter as a “column module.”
When the barrier 200 is floating in the body of water and a moving vessel 235 impacts the impact net 210, the impact net 210 deflects to transfer a force of the impact to one or more of the column modules (see arrows L), which in turn engage the water to transfer the force of the impact to the water, to arrest the motion of the vessel 235. The barrier 200 can be folded for portability such that the legs 220 are substantially parallel to each other, because the legs 220, struts 225, and columns 205 are joined to each other via elastic hinges 255, 265.
Although the single net barrier of the '342 patent is lighter and more easily portable than previous barriers, its folding legs and struts add cost, complexity, and size when folded, while lowering the system's overall strength. Additionally, its floats are on each of its horizontal legs (four legs for each column module), creating a large water plane area, which tends to make the system unstable in large wave events.
There exists a need for an effective marine barrier that is low cost, simple, and easily portable.
The present disclosure provides a marine security barrier system that addresses the aforementioned needs.
Embodiments include a marine barrier comprising a plurality of center column modules spaced apart from each other and arranged in a linear fashion, each having a substantially vertical center column beam and a buoyant portion. An impact net is attached to each of the center column beams and extends between the plurality of center column modules. A first plurality of flotation modules is spaced from each other and arranged in a linear fashion such that they are substantially parallel to the plurality of center column modules. The barrier further comprises a first plurality of legs, each leg for connecting one of the first plurality of flotation modules to one of the center column modules. Each of the first plurality of flotation modules has a pair of the first plurality of legs extending outwardly therefrom in opposing directions with an included angle therebetween, such that each of the first plurality of flotation modules is retained between two adjacent ones of the center column modules and offset from the longitudinal axis of the line of center column modules in a first direction.
A second plurality of flotation modules is spaced from each other and arranged in a linear fashion such that the second plurality of flotation modules is substantially parallel to the plurality of center column modules. A second plurality of legs is provided, each leg for connecting one of the second plurality of flotation modules to one of the center column modules. Each of the second plurality of flotation modules has a pair of the second plurality of legs extending outwardly therefrom in opposing directions with the included angle therebetween, such that each of the second plurality of flotation modules is retained between two adjacent ones of the center column modules and offset from the longitudinal axis of the line of center column modules in a second direction opposite the first direction.
Each of the first and second pluralities of flotation modules includes a buoyant portion. When the barrier is floating in a body of water and a moving vessel impacts the impact net, the impact net deflects to transfer a force of the impact to one or more of the center column modules, first plurality of flotation modules, and second plurality of flotation modules, which in turn engage the water to transfer the force of the impact to the water, to arrest the motion of the vessel.
Embodiments also include the barrier wherein each leg of the first and second pluralities of legs is for movably connecting one of the flotation modules to one of the center column modules, such that the barrier is movable from an expanded position where adjacent ones of the legs are disposed with the included angle therebetween, to a retracted position where the legs are substantially parallel to each other.
Embodiments further include a rapidly deployable marine barrier system comprising the barrier described immediately above, and a lifting cage for storing the barrier when the barrier is in the retracted position.
Objects and advantages of embodiments of the disclosed subject matter will become apparent from the following description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments will hereinafter be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like elements. The accompanying drawings have not necessarily been drawn to scale. Where applicable, some features may not be illustrated to assist in the description of underlying features.
It should be understood that the principles described herein are not limited in application to the details of construction or the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The principles can be embodied in other embodiments and can be practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Disclosed herein are marine barrier and gate systems. In the disclosed barrier and gate systems, a single impact net is strung between central columns in what is referred to as a “single net capture mechanism.” The disclosed single net capture system is simpler, more stable, and more easily foldable and ship-able than prior such systems shown in
As shown in
As best seen in
Likewise, a second plurality of flotation modules 107, each including a buoyant portion 107a, is spaced from each other and arranged in a linear fashion such that the second plurality of flotation modules 107 is substantially parallel to the plurality of center column modules 101. A second plurality of legs 108 is provided, each leg 108 for connecting one of the second plurality of flotation modules 107 to one of the center column modules 101. Each of the second plurality of flotation modules 107 has a pair of the second plurality of legs 108 extending outwardly therefrom in opposing directions with the included angle A therebetween, such that each of the second plurality of flotation modules 107 is retained between two adjacent ones of the center column modules 101 and offset from the longitudinal axis X-X of the line of center column modules 101 in a second direction opposite the first direction.
The value of included angle A depends on the length of the legs 106, 108, which can vary depending on environmental and site-specific requirements, as discussed herein below. Generally, legs 106, 108 can be from 17 to 24 inches long, resulting in each pair of corresponding flotation modules 105, 107 being spaced about 15 to about 66 inches apart.
Similar to the buoyant portions 103 of the center column modules 101, the buoyant portions 105a, 107a of the first and second pluralities of flotation modules 105, 107 comprise high density foam or a foam-filled plastic shell (e.g., an HPDE shell).
When the barrier 100 is floating in a body of water and a moving vessel impacts the impact net 104, the impact net 104 deflects to transfer a force of the impact to one or more of the center column modules 101, first plurality of flotation modules 105, and second plurality of flotation modules 107, which in turn engage the water to transfer the force of the impact to the water, to arrest the motion of the vessel.
As shown in
Each leg 106, 108 of the first and second pluralities of legs is for movably connecting one of the flotation modules 105, 107 to one of the center column modules 101 such that the barrier 100 is movable from an expanded position (best seen in
Referring now to
Each of the flotation modules 105, 107 comprises a V-shaped hinge bracket 115 secured to the buoyant portions 105a, 107a for attaching to the first hinges 113 of each pair of legs 106, 108, such that each pair of legs is disposed with the included angle A therebetween in the expanded position. Each of the center column modules 101 also comprises the hinge bracket 115 for attaching to the second hinge 114 of two adjacent ones of the legs 106, 108, such that the two legs are disposed with the included angle A therebetween in the expanded position. As shown in
In certain embodiments, the hinges 113, 114 comprise EPDM rubber having a Durometer value of about 60 to about 70. An elastic portion 400 of a hinge 113, 114 according to one embodiment is shown in
A hinge locking pin 115c, such as a ¾ inch aluminum rod, is inserted in a longitudinal through-hole molded into the faceted portion 420 of each of the rubber elastic portions 400, for retaining the elastic portions 400 in the faceted track of the hinge bracket 115. Thin metal hinge support plates 115d are placed at the ends of the locking pin 115c and act as bearing plates for retainers 115e inserted through a transverse hole in the locking pin 115c near its end to retain the locking pin 115c in place. In this way, the hinges 113, 114 are attached to bracket 115.
As shown in
The length of hinge panels 112 is scalable responsive to site-specific requirements, and/or optimized for select environmental conditions. For example, the length of hinge panels 112 can be relatively long for lower sea states and relatively short for higher sea states. This advantageous feature is made possible by the modular construction of legs 106, 108 described immediately above. Hinge panels 112 can be unbolted, removed, and replaced with panels of a different length as needed, unlike previous single net capture systems such as shown in
In a further embodiment shown in
Referring again to
The ballast weight beam 120 is slidably retractable into a recess 102a within the center column beam 102 (see
In certain embodiments shown in
Referring again to
In further embodiments of the disclosed single net capture system shown in
The lifting cage 700 comprises a floor 701 for supporting the barrier 100. Floor 701 has openings or a mesh to allow water to flow through floor 701. Lifting cage 700 also comprises a lifting frame 702 attached to the top portion of the lifting cage 700 by a chain or a cable 703. The lifting frame 702 is movably attachable to a top portion of the lifting cage 700 from a secured position (shown in
To deploy barrier 100, the lifting cage 700 is removed from its shipping container or flatbed truck. The lifting frame 702 released from the cage 700 to allow it to be raised off the top of the cage 700. Lifting frame 702 is attached to a hoist, and the cage 700 is lowered into the body of water (floor 701 is open/mesh to allow flooding). The barrier 100 is expanded via operation of the capstan/winch 111, allowing the barrier to float out of the cage 700 and the ballast weight beams 120 and ballast weights 130 to drop down from the bottom of the barrier the predetermined distance. Once barrier 100 is floating, it is towed to the deployment site by a vessel.
To recover barrier 100, the cage 700 is lowered into the body of water. Cable 109 is then fed through fairleads 110, attached to the far end one of the column modules 101, and also attached to capstan/winch 111. Barrier 100 is then retracted into the lifting cage 700 via operation of capstan/winch 111, and secured in cage 700. Cage 700 is then lifted out of the water and placed on the ground, on a truck, or in a container for storage or shipping.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that, instead of using a lifting cage, the barrier 100 can be collapsed in the water using a stand-alone capstan or winch to pay in cable 109. Then, a single lifting beam attached to the top of barrier 100 can be used to take the barrier out of the water and place it in a container, on the ground, or on a truck for storage/shipping. Likewise, such a lifting beam and winch can be used to deploy barrier 100. The lifting beam is attached to the top of a retracted barrier 100 and, once the barrier is in the water, the lifting beam is disconnected from the barrier. Barrier 100 can then be expanded via the stand-alone winch.
Another technique of deploying and recovering the barrier 100 can be seen in
It is, therefore, apparent that there is provided in accordance with the present invention, a single net capture marine barrier system. While this invention has been described in conjunction with a number of embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations would be or are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the applicable arts. Accordingly, applicants intend to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations that are within the spirit and scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1158555 | Prescott | Nov 1915 | A |
1278970 | Maxwell | Sep 1918 | A |
1299243 | Sheransky | Apr 1919 | A |
2041662 | Mapes | May 1936 | A |
2693161 | Stubbs | Nov 1954 | A |
2716959 | Betts | Sep 1955 | A |
3020567 | Colt | Feb 1962 | A |
3077614 | Lloyd | Feb 1963 | A |
3185445 | Broadway | May 1965 | A |
3499291 | Mikkelsen | Mar 1970 | A |
3604389 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3823680 | Straumsnes | Jul 1974 | A |
3864049 | Ono | Feb 1975 | A |
4033137 | Geist | Jul 1977 | A |
4174185 | Toki | Nov 1979 | A |
4272214 | Nyfeldt et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4319858 | Jaffrennou et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4425053 | Mute et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
5062739 | Klockner | Nov 1991 | A |
5141359 | Klockner | Aug 1992 | A |
5179907 | Galbraith | Jan 1993 | A |
5429452 | Frost | Jul 1995 | A |
5651709 | Nandakumar et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5827011 | Kann | Oct 1998 | A |
5980159 | Kazim | Nov 1999 | A |
6102616 | Foote | Aug 2000 | A |
6591774 | Metherell et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6655641 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681709 | Nixon | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6843197 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6860209 | McKoy | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877456 | Metherell et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886484 | Thomas | May 2005 | B2 |
6960047 | Knezek et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980483 | McDonald | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7140599 | Spink | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7401565 | Nixon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7451527 | Pearce et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
RE40616 | Nixon | Jan 2009 | E |
7481176 | Pratt et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7524139 | Bishop | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524140 | Bishop | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7572083 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7726910 | Foo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744313 | Terai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7887254 | Bishop | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7975639 | Bishop | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007202 | Davis et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8020836 | Bishop | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8844114 | Butterfield | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8920075 | Bishop | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9683342 | Bishop | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20030190191 | Clark | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040018055 | Clark et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018060 | Knezek et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040115002 | Meeks et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050013668 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050058509 | Steinberg | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050191129 | Yodock et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060034668 | Knezek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037526 | Knezek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060216116 | Baker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070102689 | Alberson | May 2007 | A1 |
20080105184 | Nixon | May 2008 | A1 |
20080267717 | Meyers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279631 | Bishop | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035068 | Terai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090059 | Bishop | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100059728 | Bishop | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100178109 | Wilson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100239374 | Davis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130108368 | Bishop | May 2013 | A1 |
20130119334 | Bishop | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0226019 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/053094 dated Nov. 20, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/2012/052655 dated Nov. 6, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report dated Mar. 4, 2014 in PCT/US2012/053094. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/067524 dated Feb. 25, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/067558 dated Feb. 24, 2015. |