Genus and species: Rubus idaeus L.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisRaspNine’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct raspberry variety designated ‘DrisRaspNine’ and botanically known as Rubus idaeus L. This new raspberry variety was discovered in Ventura County, Calif. in February 2011 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent raspberry plant ‘RB629.4’ (unpatented) and the proprietary male parent raspberry plant ‘RB629.5’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new variety was first asexually propagated at a nursery in Santa Cruz County, Calif. in 2011. ‘DrisRaspNine’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Ventura County, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations via tissue culture and root cuttings.
The following are the most outstanding and distinguishing characteristics of this new variety when grown under normal horticultural practices in Ventura, Calif.:
This new raspberry plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs which show fruit, flowers and leaves of the new plant. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures. The photographs are of plants that are six months old.
The following detailed descriptions set forth the distinctive characteristics of ‘DrisRaspNine’. The data which define these characteristics is based on observations taken in Ventura County, Calif. from 2011 to 2015. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisRaspNine’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisRaspNine’ was taken from six-month-old plants. Color references are primarily to The R.H.S. Colour Chart of The Royal Horticultural Society of London (R.H.S.) (2015 edition). Descriptive terminology follows the Plant Identification Terminology, An Illustrated Glossary, 2nd edition by James G. Harris and Melinda Woolf Harris, unless where otherwise defined.
‘DrisRaspNine’ differs from the proprietary female parent ‘RB629.4’ (unpatented) in that ‘DrisRaspNine’ has a higher percentage of marketable fruit and the fruit has better flavor than the fruit of ‘RB629.4’. Additionally, plants of ‘DrisRaspNine’ have a more vigorous growth habit and better emergence of canes after planting than ‘RB629.4’.
‘DrisRaspNine’ differs from the proprietary male parent ‘RB629.5’ (unpatented) in that ‘DrisRaspNine’ has brighter colored, firmer fruit than ‘RB629.5’.
‘DrisRaspNine’ differs from the commercial variety ‘Driscoll Maravilla’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,804), in that ‘DrisRaspNine’ has medium sized, soft fruit having an easy adherence to the plug, whereas ‘Driscoll Maravilla’ has large sized, firm fruit having a medium adherence to the plug. Additionally, ‘DrisRaspNine’ usually has three lateral leaflets with a free arrangement, whereas ‘Driscoll Maravilla’ usually has five lateral leaflets with an overlapping arrangement.
‘DrisRaspNine’ differs from the commercial variety ‘DrisRaspSeven’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 25,045) in that ‘DrisRaspNine’ has medium sized, soft fruit with an ovate shape, whereas ‘DrisRaspSeven’ has large sized, medium firm fruit with a long conical shape. Additionally, ‘DrisRaspNine’ usually has three lateral leaflets and terminal leaflets that are convex in cross section, whereas ‘DrisRaspSeven’ usually has five lateral leaflets and terminal leaflets that are flat in cross section.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PP4486 | Reiter | Nov 1979 | P |
PP6493 | Wilhelm | Dec 1988 | P |
PP7436 | Ackerman | Feb 1991 | P |
PP7437 | Ackerman | Feb 1991 | P |
PP8022 | Wilhelm | Nov 1992 | P |
PP8027 | Wilhelm | Nov 1992 | P |
PP9340 | Wilhelm et al. | Oct 1995 | P |
PP9653 | Wilhelm et al. | Oct 1996 | P |
PP9696 | Fear | Nov 1996 | P |
PP11067 | Fear et al. | Sep 1999 | P |
PP11087 | Fear et al. | Oct 1999 | P |
PP11094 | Fear et al. | Oct 1999 | P |
PP11102 | Fear et al. | Oct 1999 | P |
PP14761 | Fear et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP14781 | Fear et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP14804 | Fear et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP14860 | Fear et al. | Jun 2004 | P2 |
PP14903 | Fear et al. | Jun 2004 | P2 |
PP14904 | Fear et al. | Jun 2004 | P2 |
PP18658 | Fear et al. | Mar 2008 | P3 |
PP18659 | Fear et al. | Mar 2008 | P3 |
PP19137 | Harrison et al. | Aug 2008 | P3 |
PP19656 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2009 | P2 |
PP22246 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2011 | P3 |
PP22731 | Fear et al. | May 2012 | P2 |
PP23477 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 2013 | P3 |
PP24610 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2014 | P3 |
PP25044 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2014 | P3 |
PP25045 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2014 | P3 |
20160219774 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2016 | P1 |
Entry |
---|
Cousineau et al. “Use of Isoenzyme Analysis to Characterize Raspberry Cultivars and Detect Cultivar Mislabeling”, HortScience, vol. 27, No. 9, 1992, pp. 1023-1025. |
Hamilton, Brian K., U.S. Appl. No. 14/999,878, filed Jul. 13, 2016, titled “Raspberry Plant Variety Named ‘Drisraspten’”. |
Williams et al. “Dna Polymorphisms Amplified by Arbitrary Primers are Useful As Genetic Markers”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, No. 22, 1990, pp. 6531-6535. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170311501 P1 | Oct 2017 | US |