This invention relates to a ratchet block, and in particular to a ratchet block where the operation of the ratchet depends upon the load to which the block is subjected by a line passing around a sheave rotatably mounted within the block.
Ratchet blocks for use in yachting, dinghy sailing and the like are well known and typically comprise a block body defining a pair of cheeks, between which is rotatably mounted a sheave. A ratchet mechanism is mounted on the block body and cooperates with ratchet teeth formed on the sheave such that when the mechanism is active, the sheave may rotate in only one sense. Generally, a manually-operable control for the ratchet mechanism is provided, whereby the mechanism may be switched between active and inactive settings, and when inactive, the sheave may rotate in either sense.
Particularly when racing sailing boats of various kinds, the control lines for the sails may be subjected to relatively high loads. If that line passes around a block attached to some other component, a correspondingly high load will be imparted to the block. If the bitter end is being held manually, the load on the line may be relieved by employing a ratchet block arranged so that when the ratchet is active, the line may be pulled in but the ratchet mechanism resists rotation of the sheave in the direction which allows the line to be payed out.
If the ratchet mechanism is set to its active position and the line is to be payed out, the ratchet mechanism will resist free rotation of the sheave and so the line will not run smoothly through the block. As such, it may be necessary to switch the mechanism so as to be in its inactive setting, when the line is to run free.
In order to overcome this disadvantage of having to switch the ratchet mechanism between its active and inactive settings depending upon whether a line is to be hauled in or payed out, it is known to provide a block with an automatically operating ratchet mechanism, the operation of which depends upon the load to which the block is subjected. There have been various proposals for such blocks and it is a principal aim of this invention to provide an improved form of a load activated ratchet block which is relatively easy to manufacture and yet which is reliable in operation. A further aim of preferred forms of the block is to allow pre-setting, either during manufacture or by a user, of the load at which the ratchet mechanism becomes active, or becomes inactive.
According to this invention, there is provided a ratchet block comprising:
Though the pawl and actuator could be mounted on a side cheek with the actuator being operated by said interconnecting means carried on the hub, the most preferred embodiment has the pawl and actuator mounted on the hub.
It will be appreciated that the operation of the ratchet mechanism with the block of this invention depends upon the load to which the block is subjected. The hub of the sheave assembly is pivoted to the block body about an axis spaced from the principal axis of the sheave assembly and that assembly is spring loaded to an unloaded limiting position. When the block body is secured to some other component and a line passing around the sheave is subjected to tension, the sheave assembly will pivot against that spring loading to its loaded position. This pivoting movement of the sheave assembly moves the actuator from its first setting which in turn moves the pawl to its engaged setting so rendering active the ratchet mechanism.
Typically, the side cheeks are held in the required disposition by a bridging piece, which may be part of the side cheeks or a separate spacer. That bridging piece conventionally serves as a mounting for the block; for example, a mounting pin could rotatably be supported in the bridging piece or a strop may pass around the bridging piece to tie the block to some other component. In order to allow operation as described above, the pivotal axis of the hub to the side cheeks preferably lies on a diameter extending substantially at right angles to a notional line passing through said principal axis of the sheave assembly and the bridging piece. If then a load is imparted to a line passing around the sheave, the block will tend to align itself with said notional line, so enabling the sheave assembly to pivot as aforesaid, when that load is sufficiently high to overcome the bias of the spring means.
In a preferred form of this invention, the pawl is pivoted to the hub for movement between ratchet-engaged and free settings. Similarly, the actuator is also mounted on the hub for pivoting movement between first and second settings, corresponding respectively to the unloaded and loaded limiting positions of the hub. In this case, the pawl may be connected to the actuator by an over-centre spring mechanism so as to have stable engaged and free settings. Such a mechanism may include a helical compression spring having one end engaged with the pawl and the other end with the actuator, whereby the movement of the actuator from either the first or second settings thereof bends the spring, initially compressing the spring until an over-centre position is reached whereafter the spring extends again, so moving the pawl to its other setting.
The hub may be generally annular and so have a central bore, with said spring means being disposed within that bore and acting between the hub and a fixed part of the block body. Conveniently, that fixed part comprises an abutment extending through the bore of the hub. The spring means may comprise a hoop-stressed C-shape spring one end of which is connected to the abutment and the other end of which is connected to the hub. Preferably, the force imparted by the spring can be adjusted either during manufacture or subsequently by a user, for example by changing the number of springs disposed within the hub, or changing a spring of one spring-rating by another having a different spring-rating.
The actuator is moved from its first position upon pivoting movement of the hub from its unloaded position against the action of the spring means, under an applied load. For this purpose, the actuator may include a cam profile co-operable with a cam follower provided on the adjacent side cheek whereby the actuator is moved from its first position where the hub is in its unloaded position to a second position as the hub is moved to its loaded position, under the action of an applied load on the sheave. Preferably, means are provided to limit the pivoting movement of the hub about its pivotal axis to the side cheeks. Conveniently, an elongate slot is provided at a location opposed to the pivoting axis of the hub and engaged by an abutment formed on the hub.
The block may include a pair of similar ratchet mechanisms each as described above, and disposed one to each side of the sheave so as to be operable in unison.
By way of example only, two specific embodiments of load-activated ratchet block arranged in accordance with this invention will now be described in detail, reference being made to the accompanying drawings in which:—
Referring initially to
A sheave assembly 15 is mounted between the two side cheeks 11,12 and comprises a hub 16 rotatably supporting an annular sheave 17, typically by means of a pair of ball races (not shown) having balls running on tracks provided on both the hub and the sheave. The hub is formed in two parts split in a radial plane and held together by rivets 18, following the mounting of the sheave 17 thereon. Such an assembly is well known in the block art and will not be described in further detail here.
The block incorporates a load-activated ratchet mechanism in order to prevent rotation of the sheave in one sense when a line extending around the sheave applies a load to the block in excess of a predetermined value. On both sides of the annular sheave 17, adjacent the periphery thereof, is a ring of inwardly directed ratchet teeth 19. Each of those rings of teeth are engageable by a respective pawl 20, though in the following the arrangement on only one side of the sheave assembly will be described. The pawl 20 is pivoted to the hub 16 about shaft 21 extending through the hub. The profiling of the pawl 20 and teeth 19 as well as the location of the shaft 21 are such that when the pawl is spring-urged into engagement with the ratchet teeth (as will be described below), the sheave 17 may freely rotate in a clockwise direction (in
The sheave assembly 15 is pivotally mounted between the side cheeks 11 and 12 by means of a dowel 29 extending through aligned bores in the side cheeks and in the hub 16. Typically, the dowel is in two parts threaded together, each part having an enlarged head 30 for engaging the outer face of the adjacent side cheek and provided with holes to permit threading engagement of the two parts, using a suitable tool. The bore through the hub 16 extends parallel to but spaced from the rotational axis of the sheave 17 and also is displaced to one side of the axis of the mounting pin 14. Pivoting movement of the hub assembly about dowel 29 is limited by a further dowel 31 extending through a bore in the hub diametrically opposed to the bore receiving dowel 29, that further dowel extending through elongate slots 32 in the side cheeks 11 and 12. Rather than having dowels 29 and 31 extending through respective bores in the hub, a spigot may project from both sides of the hub at each location where a dowel is required. The spigot may be threaded axially with a fastener threaded thereon.
A plurality (and in this embodiment, three) of C-shaped springs 33 are located side-by-side within the bore of the hub 16. The ends of the spring are appropriately profiled so that one end of each spring is engaged with a first bar 34 located in a radially outwardly directed recess in the inner surface of the hub 16 and the other end is hooked around a second bar 35 carried in a pair of lugs 36 projecting inwardly from the two side cheeks 11 and 12. In this way, the sheave assembly 15 is spring-urged to an unloaded position shown in
The arrangement of the pawl 20, actuator 25 and compression spring 24 forms an over-centre mechanism such that the pawl has two stable positions depending upon the position of the actuator 25: in one of these stable positions (
The actuator 25 is moved from its position shown in
When the load is removed from a line extending around the sheave, the sheave assembly is permitted to move back to its unloaded position (
The load which must be applied to the sheave assembly 15 by a line extending around the sheave in order to cause the ratchet mechanism to become active may be pre-set by controlling during manufacture the spring force of each of the springs 33, or by changing the number of springs employed within the hub 16. The latter may be made user-adjustable, by removal of the second bar 35, whereafter removal of one or more of the springs is permitted and perhaps replacement of those springs having different spring characteristics.
As mentioned hereinbefore, corresponding ratchet mechanisms are provided on both sides of the sheave assembly. These ratchet mechanisms share a common shaft 21, further shaft 26 and peg 38, with separate pawls 20, actuators 25 and compression springs 24 on each side of the hub 16. Rather than sharing a common shaft 21, further shaft 26 and peg 38, the hub could be provided with axially aligned shafts and pegs, projecting from each side of the hub.
In this second embodiment, an actuator 42 is pivoted to the hub 16 about a further shaft 26 disposed close to dowel 29 and that actuator has a somewhat different cam profile as compared to actuator 25, for co-operation with peg 38 located close to dowel 29. The actuator 42 in conjunction with compression spring 24 and pawl 44 forms an over-centre mechanism, pawl 44 having a slightly different profile as compared to pawl 20 but pawl 44 has the same functionality. Also as with the first embodiment, corresponding ratchet mechanisms are provided on both sides of the sheave assembly.
As can be seen in the drawings, the peg 38 locates in a U-shaped slot formed in the actuator, with the peg being a relatively close fit so that movement between the hub and the adjacent side plate will cause corresponding movement of the actuator. A more open slot could provide a dwell space which would leave the ratchet operational despite some unloading of the sheave assembly and requiring the sheave to turn fractionally in the non-ratcheting direction to free the mechanism. A particular advantage of using a helical spring as described is that it can accommodate being pulled into an S-shape by the momentarily conflicting positions of the pawl and actuator, until the unloading has continued sufficiently to allow full operation.
Though the first embodiment shows an open cam profile 39 for the actuator 25, that actuator could have a profile similar to that of the actuator 42 described above with reference to
This second embodiment of block operates in precisely the same manner as has been described above with reference to the first embodiment and no further description of that operation is required here.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0717855.1 | Sep 2007 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
328340 | Robbins | Oct 1885 | A |
2349084 | Findley | May 1944 | A |
2356147 | Caldwell | Aug 1944 | A |
7431269 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2287688 | Sep 1995 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090072209 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |