Patent Grant
7221648
Related subject matter is disclosed in the following application being filed concurrently herewith: U.S. patent application entitled “Sub-Packet Adaptation In A Wireless Communication System”, Ser. No. 09/725,393.
The present invention relates generally to wireless communication systems and, in particular, to data transmission over wireless communication systems.
In the well-known Data Only Evolution of third generation CDMA based wireless communication systems, hereinafter referred to as 3G-1x EVDO, voice and data services are provided using separate frequency carriers. That is, the voice and data signals are transmitted over separate forward links defined by different frequency carriers. Data is transmitted over a time multiplexed frequency carrier at fixed data transmit powers but at variable data rates. Specifically, measured SIR at a receiver of a pilot signal transmitted by a base station is used to determine a data rate which can be supported by the receiver. Typically, the determined data rate corresponds to a maximum data rate at which a minimum level of quality of service can be achieved at the receiver. Higher measured SIR translates into higher data rates, wherein higher data rates involve higher order modulation and weaker coding than lower data rates. For example, if measured SIR at the receiver is 12 dB and −2 dB at two different receivers, then the data rates may be 2.4 Mb/s and 38.4 Kb/s at each of the respective receivers.
To improve system throughput, 3G-1x EVDO allows the receiver with the most favorable channel conditions, i.e., highest measured SIR, and thereby the highest associated data rate, to transmit ahead of receivers with comparatively less favorable channel conditions. 3G-1x EVDO utilizes a fast rate adaptation mechanism whereby the receiver, for every time slot, measures SIR, calculates a data rate using the measured SIR and reports the calculated data rate to the base station. Calculated data rates from multiple receivers are used by the base station to schedule when data transmission is to occur for a particular receiver.
Data transmission from the base station to a particular receiver occurs when that receiver reports the highest calculated data rate to the base station. The following protocol is utilized in data transmissions. The base station transmits data to the receiver in time slot n at the calculated data rate. The receiver receives the data transmission and responds with an ACK/NACK message indicating to the base station whether the data transmission was successfully received, i.e., no errors, by the receiver. Specifically, if the data transmission is successfully received, the receiver responds with an acknowledgement or ACK. Otherwise the receiver responds with a negative acknowledgement or NACK. The ACK/NACK message is received by base station in time slot n+j, wherein j is some known time offset. Thus, the base station can determine that an ACK/NACK message was transmitted from a receiver to which data was transmitted j time slots prior to receipt of the ACK/NACK message.
If an ACK was received, the base station knows that the data transmission to the associated receiver was successful. If a NACK was, the base station knows that the data transmission to the associated receiver was unsuccessful. In response to the NACK, the base station re-transmits, at the same data rate, the same data which was earlier transmitted. Note that the term “re-transmits the same data” should be understood to describe a retransmission of the data that may or may not be identical to the data it is being compared to, i.e., data transmitted in a previous transmission, so long as the data of the retransmission may be soft combined with the data to which it is being compared. The re-transmitted data is received by the receiver in time slot n+j+k, wherein k is some known time offset.
This prior art protocol disadvantageously utilizes the data rate of the initial transmission for re-transmissions even if the channel conditions may have changed for the associated receiver. Specifically, if the channel conditions degraded between the time of the initial transmission and the re-transmission, the re-transmission will likely suffer a higher frame error rate (FER) than the initial transmission, thereby suffering a degradation in transmission quality. Or if the channel conditions improved, then channel resources are being inefficiently utilized since a higher data rate could had been used for the re-transmission.
The present invention is a method of data rate adaptation based on channel conditions. In the present invention, data is initially transmitted at a first data rate based on a measured first channel condition and subsequently re-transmitted at a second data rate based on a measured second channel condition, wherein the first channel condition is measured prior in time to the second channel condition.
The features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
The present invention is a method of data rate adaptation based on channel conditions.
In another embodiment, the sub-packet transmitted in step 120 may be transmitted at a data rate higher than the data rate indicated in the rate indication message. The reason for doing this is to decrease the amount of time slots over which the sub-packets are to be transmitted in step 120. Although the transmission quality may degrade because of the increased data rate, Hybrid ARQ may be used to soft combine the sub-packets transmitted in step 140 with the sub-packets transmitted in step 120. Under certain conditions, e.g. at lower data rates, when using Hybrid ARQ (soft combining) throughput efficiency of the channel can be improved through the “aggressive” use of the channel, i.e., transmitting at higher data rates than indicated by the receiver.
The data rate at which the encoder sub-packets are transmitted may be negotiated between the base station and receiver anytime prior to the actual transmission of the encoder sub-packets. For example, the receiver transmits a rate indication message to the base station indicating a data rate of 19.2 Kb/s. The base station wants to be aggressive with the data transmission by using a data rate of 76.8 Kb/s to transmit an encoder sub-packet to the receiver. Accordingly, the base station transmits a new rate message to the receiver indicating the new data rate at which the base station will be transmitting the encoder sub-packet to the receiver, wherein the new data rate indicated may or may not be the same as the data rate indicated in the data rate message. Upon receipt of the new rate message, the receiver would know the data rate to use in decoding the encoder sub-packet.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the new data rate is based on the data rate message and the size of the encoder packet. For larger size encoder packets, it is desirable to set the new data rate as a higher multiple, e.g., four times, of the data rate indicated in the data rate message in order to reduce the number of time slots utilized in the transmission and to promote scheduling flexibility. By contrast, for smaller size encoder packets, it is desirable to set the new data rate as a lower multiple, e.g., one times, of the data rate indicated in the data rate message in order to utilize the channel more efficiently.
Table I depicts an example lookup table which may be used in selecting a new data rate based on the data rate indicated by the receiver and the size of the encoder packet. For example, suppose the data rate message indicates a data rate of 38.4 Kb/s and the encoder packet is 1,536 bits. The new rate message would then indicate a new data rate of 153.6 Kb/s.
In step 125, the base station receives an ACK/NACK message from the selected receiver. If the message is an ACK, in step 130, flowchart 100 returns to step 110. If the message is a NACK, in step 135, the base station receives from the selected receiver another rate indication message. Additionally, when a NACK is transmitted by the receiver, the receiver stores in memory the received data which was transmitted in step 120 such that it may later be soft combined with a re-transmission of the same data.
In step 140, the base station re-transmits the sub-packet of data to the selected receiver at the data rate indicated in the second rate indication message received in step 135. As in step 120, the sub-packet may be transmitted at a data rate higher than the data rate indicated in the second rate indication message.
In one embodiment, the sub-packet of data transmitted in steps 120 and 140 are of the same size but the number of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted or modulation scheme may vary if the data rates in steps 120 and 140 are different. In another embodiment, such sub-packet are of different sizes if Hybrid ARQ may be used to soft combine the sub-packets transmitted in steps 120 and 140.
In an alternate embodiment, regardless of whether the ACK/NACK message transmitted by the selected receiver is an ACK or a NACK, flowchart 100 returns to step 110 from step 125. In this embodiment, the re-transmission to the originally selected receiver would not occur until the selected receiver is the receiver with the highest associated data rate.
In a preferred embodiment, the manner in which sub-packets are transmitted in steps 120 and 140 allows for Hybrid ARQ at different data rates. This embodiment is achieved by varying the size of the sub-packets, the modulation scheme and number of time slots over which the sub-packets are transmitted.
Note that each of the encoder sub-packets are associated with different data rates. That is, the two 13,824 bit encoder sub-packets are associated with a data rate of 819.2 Kb/s; the 24,576 bit encoder sub-packet is associated with data rates of 38.4 Kb/s, 76.8 Kb/s, 153.6 Kb/s and 307.2 Kb/s; the two 12,288 bit encoder sub-packets are associated with data rates of 614.4 Kb/s and 1288.8 Kb/s; and the three 6,144 bit encoder sub-packets are associated with a data rate of 2457.6 Kb/s. Thus, if the data rate at which the sub-packet was to be transmitted was 153.6 Kb/s, the sub-packet size would be 24,576 bits. Note that there exists a single sub-packet format for a given data rate and encoder packet size. Although
In step 220, an encoder packet size identifier is added to the encoder sub-packet, wherein the encoder packet size identifier indicates the size of the packet from which the encoder sub-packet was derived. Based on the encoder packet size identifier and the transmission data rate, the receiver can determine the format of the sub-packet such that the receiver can correctly soft combine and jointly decode the associated encoder sub-packet with a re-transmission or a prior transmission of an encoder sub-packet derived from the same encoder packet (although the latter sub-packet may be in a different format). Recall that there exists a single sub-packet format for a given data rate and encoder packet size. The data rate is known to receiver based on one of many alternate embodiments discussed above. The transmission data rate is mapped from the rate indication message from the receiver, either based on a mapping that is indicated to the receiver at connection set-up, or on a broadcast channel. Otherwise, the transmission data rate is transmitted in a message or in data header information to the receiver.
In another embodiment, whether or not there exists a single sub-packet format for a given data rate and encoder packet size, an encoder sub-packet format identifier may be added to the encoder sub-packet in lieu of, or in conjunction with, the encoder sub-packet size identifier. The encoder sub-packet format identifier indicating a format of the associated encoder sub-packet such that the receiver knows how to derive the encoder packet from the encoder sub-packet.
In step 225, the encoder sub-packet is modulated and transmitted to the receiver over one or more time slots. The type of modulation scheme used to modulate the encoder sub-packet depends on the new data rate. Table II depicts an example lookup table which may be used in selecting a modulation scheme based on the new data rate. As can be seen, higher modulations (with more bits per symbol) are required to achieve the higher data rates. For example, if the new data rate is 307.2 Kb/s, then the modulation scheme used to transmit the encoder sub-packet would be QPSK.
The number of time slots used in the transmission of the encoder sub-packet depends on the new data rate and the size of the encoder packet (or encoder sub-packet). Table III depicts an example lookup table which may used in determining the number of time slots required for transmitting a particular size encoder packet at the new data rate.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain embodiments, other versions are possible. For example, the present invention is also applicable to encoder packets which are not 3,072 bits in size; the encoder sub-packet sizes may vary; the data rate at which particular encoder sub-packets may vary; etc. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the present invention should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4589111 | Adachi | May 1986 | A |
| 4939731 | Reed et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5490168 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5515368 | Saito et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5544170 | Kasahara | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5828677 | Sayeed et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5838267 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5914959 | Marchetto et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5931964 | Beming et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940772 | Kameda | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6208663 | Schramm et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212240 | Scheibel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6366763 | Ue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6414938 | Corke et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6519731 | Huang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6574211 | Padovani et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6721834 | Das et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6754189 | Shepard et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 984 534 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 9083600 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020097684 A1 | Jul 2002 | US |
