The invention is generally directed to a wet-shave razor cartridge, and more specifically to a wet-shave razor cartridge having multiple razor blades.
The comfort and performance provided by a particular razor is critical to the commercial success of that razor. Modern safety razors used in wet shaving operations to cut hair on hirsute surfaces typically are available in two types—a replaceable having a handle that uses a disposable razor cartridge, or a disposable having a handle combined with a razor cartridge such that the razor cartridge cannot be removed from the handle without destruction of one, the other or both. There are many design similarities between the razor cartridges used in each razor type.
Generally, the razor cartridge contains a number of blades with each blade defining a cutting edge; employing a plurality of cutting edges increases the shaving efficiency of the razor by increasing the number of times any one hair is cut in a single pass thereby decreasing the number of strokes necessary to satisfactorily shave a particular hirsute surface. The fewer number of strokes required over any given surface, the less the potential for irritation of that surface.
The typical multi-blade razor cartridge includes a frame that supports two or more razor blades. A typical frame can be of a single formed piece of plastic or can be any number of assembled parts. The frame typically provides a leading surface and a trailing surface to which the cutting edges are generally parallel. In use, the hirsute surface being shaved contacts in turn the leading surface, the cutting edges of the blades, and the trailing surface.
The leading surface and the trailing surface are generally at opposite sides of an opening defined by the frame in which at least a portion of the cutting edges are exposed. The leading and the trailing surfaces can be used to define a plane that extends over the opening and is approximately tangent to the leading and trailing surfaces. This plane is referred to by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, as a “contact plane” and is used as a reference for both qualifying and quantifying the exposure of a cutting edge.
With reference to the contact plane, a cutting edge can be qualified as having an exposure that is neutral, positive, or negative. A cutting edge has a neutral exposure if the entire cutting edge is on the contact plane. A cutting edge has a negative exposure if it is neither on nor extends through the contact plane. Similarly, if a cutting edge extends through the contact plane, its exposure is positive.
Historically, cutting edge exposure has been neutral, however, this does not necessarily render the closest shave at an acceptable comfort level. Accordingly, it is the general object of the present invention to provide a razor cartridge that improves upon or eliminates the problem associated with the prior art.
The present invention is directed in one aspect to a razor cartridge having a frame. The frame has an opening defined in part by a leading surface and a trailing surface, which cooperate to define a contact plane tangential thereto and extending across the opening. At least two razor blades, each having a cutting edge, are coupled to the frame with each cutting edge positioned at least in part in the opening. All of the cutting edges either have a common positive cutting edge exposure or a common negative cutting edge exposure.
In accordance with the present invention, the distance from the contact plane with regard to a set of blades all having either a positive or a negative exposure can vary from blade to blade. Alternatively, the distance from the contact plane can be constant for each cutting edge. Moreover, the distance from the contact plane can vary from blade-to-blade in accordance with a linear or non-linear function.
In an embodiment of the present invention, at least one blade is angularly offset or skewed relative to another blade. Skewed blades can provide for more effective wash through and thereby debris removal than parallel blades. While one blade has been described as being skewed relative to other blades, the present invention is not limited in their regard as any number, or all of the blades can be skewed without departing from the broader aspects of the present invention.
As shown in
As shown in
The frame 16 has a leading surface 30 and a generally opposite trailing surface 32. During a shaving operation, a hirsute surface contacts in turn the leading surface 30, the cutting edges 20, and the trailing surface 32. The leading surface 30 is defined by a guard 34 and the trailing surface 32 is defined by a guard 36, where both the cap and the guard are mounted to the base 24. While the frame 16 has been shown and described as including a cap 36 and a base 24, the present invention is not limited in this regard. For example, the cap 36 could be replaced by a comfort strip. In addition, the cap 36 and the guard 34 could be molded into the frame 16 and not be separate parts to be attached to a base 24.
The leading surface and the trailing surface, 30 and 32 respectively, cooperate to define a contact plane 38 tangential thereto that extends across the opening 18. In the illustrated embodiment, the contact plane 38 is defined by a surface created by a series of approximately parallel lines extending between and contacting the leading surface 30 and the trailing surface 32, over the opening 18. As shown in
The contact plane 38 permits the cutting edge exposure for the cutting edges 22 of each razor blade 20 to be categorized as neutral, positive, or negative. A cutting edge 22 has neutral cutting edge exposure if the entire cutting edge is on the contact plane. A cutting edge 22 has positive cutting edge exposure if any portion of the cutting edge extends through the contact plane 38. A cutting edge 22 has a negative exposure if the cutting edge neither touches, nor extends through the contact plane 38.
The base 24 includes flow members 40 positioned between successive razor blades 20 and between the razor blades and the frame 16. There may be any number of flow members 40, that can be equally or unequally spaced. The flow members 40 engage a hirsute surface at or about the contact plane 38. The flow members 40 preferably have a small tip radius of about 0.02 to 0.5 mm. However, the present invention is not limited in this regard as other radii can be employed. During a shaving operation, the flow members 40 support the hirsute surface and prevent it from entering the interstitial areas between the razor blades 20 and the razor blades and the frame 16, thereby reducing razor bum or nicking of the hirsute surface. The number and size of the flow members 40 should be selected to minimize the interference with as much of a cutting edge 22 as possible.
Referring to
Referring to
In
As shown in
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions are possible, particularly versions wherein the contact plane or razor blades are not planar, and the cutting edges have a geometry other than a line. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the invention should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/132,536 filed Apr. 24, 2002, now abandoned the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1920711 | Pelizzola | Aug 1933 | A |
3660893 | Welsh | May 1972 | A |
3786563 | Dorion et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
4069580 | Emmett | Jan 1978 | A |
4146958 | Chen | Apr 1979 | A |
4170821 | Booth | Oct 1979 | A |
4200976 | Gooding | May 1980 | A |
4345374 | Jacobson | Aug 1982 | A |
4407067 | Trotta | Oct 1983 | A |
4443940 | Francis et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4562644 | Hitchens | Jan 1986 | A |
4831731 | Elits | May 1989 | A |
5056222 | Miller et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5141694 | Butlin et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5249361 | Apprille | Oct 1993 | A |
5402574 | Milner | Apr 1995 | A |
5522137 | Andrews | Jun 1996 | A |
5524346 | Backhaus | Jun 1996 | A |
5661907 | Apprille | Sep 1997 | A |
5689883 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5711076 | Yin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5813119 | Ferraro et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5893213 | Motta | Apr 1999 | A |
5953824 | Ferraro et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966822 | Coffin | Oct 1999 | A |
6026577 | Ferraro | Feb 2000 | A |
D424744 | Coffin | May 2000 | S |
6112412 | Richard | Sep 2000 | A |
6122826 | Coffin | Sep 2000 | A |
6138361 | Richard | Oct 2000 | A |
6212777 | Gilder et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216349 | Gilder | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266884 | Prochaska | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276062 | Prochaska | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6378211 | Wonderley | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6430818 | Wonderley | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6550141 | Rivers et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568084 | McCool et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
20030154832 | Guimont et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040025350 | Richard et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1252982 | Oct 2002 | EP |
WO 9733728 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-9939883 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-9950035 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0037227 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030217469 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10132536 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 10374413 | US |