1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to razor cartridges in general, and, more particularly, to razor cartridges including a retainer.
2. Background Information
Many modern safety razors include a disposable razor cartridge adapted to be connected to a handle by connecting structure therebetween. The cartridge includes a frame having at least one razor blade with a cutting edge disposed therein. Some modern razor cartridges include cap structure of the frame having a lubricating strip, sometimes referred to as a shaving aid strip that can enhance shaving comfort by reducing friction and/or imparting shaving aids during use.
Although the lubricating strip can be successful in enhancing comfort during use, these strips and their associated cap structure can be relatively wide. This can often hinder the shaving process. For example, when shaving hard to reach areas (e.g., under the nose) or areas that require precision (e.g., sideburns), the cap structure can often physically impede the accurate placement of the razor blade on the desired location and/or make it difficult to pre-determine exactly where the blade will contact the skin and begin shaving. Such difficulties can lead to areas of the skin left unshaven, as well as areas shaven where the user did not wish to shave.
Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,309 discloses a safety razor that addresses this problem by providing the lubricating strip or lubricating member as a separate member additional to and articulately connected to the frame of the cartridge. This so-called separable lubrication can be selectively operated by a user for trimming operations, which can enable the user to see the area to be shaved more clearly. The outer surface of the rear wall of the frame of the razor cartridge is as close to the cutting edge of the blade as possible. For example, the aforementioned '309 application discloses the outer surface of the rear wall rear edge is preferably less 2 mm from the cutting edge. However, such a narrow rear wall should still provide structural stability to the cartridge frame, especially in the event that a safety razor having such a razor cartridge, and having the cartridge in its trimming (or locked) position is accidentally dropped.
Some modern razor cartridges include a plurality of razor blades (e.g., two, three, four, five or more) disposed in the frame, the blades being resiliently mounted in the frame and being moveable relative to the frame away from an at-rest position in response to forces encountered during shaving. U.S. Pat. No. 4,586,255 to Jacobson discloses such a razor cartridge having two razor blades. The cartridge assembly includes a pair of spring clamps disposed in respective grooves at each end of the frame and enveloping the respective ends of the frame. The spring clamps retain the blades in the frame and define the at-rest positions for the blades. U.S. Pat. No. 6,161,287 to Swanson et al. discloses such a razor cartridge having three blades and an annular retainer clip that is disposed about the periphery of the frame and serves to retain the blades onto the frame and define the at-rest positions for the blades.
The present disclosure has for its objective to eliminate, or at least substantially alleviate the limitations of the prior art cartridge retainers when employed with razor cartridges having a separable lubrication. A razor cartridge has a frame, one or more razor blades mounted in the frame, a cartridge retainer disposed around a portion of a periphery of the frame and a separable lubrication articulately connected to the frame. The separable lubrication can be selectively moveable between a forward position and a locked position. The cartridge retainer includes a first portion that has a surface that defines a skin engaging surface when the separable lubrication is in the locked position and a second portion that retains the blade in the frame. The cartridge retainer includes means to fixedly attach the cartridge retainer to the frame, for example by bending a tab against the frame, use of a suitable adhesive, welding, riveting, staking or insert molding the cartridge retainer in the frame. The cartridge retainer includes a rear wall that defines the rear edge of the razor cartridge when the separable lubrication is in the locked position. The rear wall is preferably spaced less than 3 mm from a cutting edge of the razor blade and more preferably spaced less than 2 mm from the cutting edge of the razor blade. The cartridge retainer is preferably manufactured from aluminum to provide galvanic corrosion protection for the razor blade.
The above-mentioned features are effective to produce a razor cartridge having a separable lubrication that can resist abnormal abuse, such as accidental dropping e.g. onto tile flooring in a shower during use. The cartridge retainer helps provide structural stability to the cartridge frame and retention and location of the various elements of the razor cartridge are assured during usage of the system.
These and other advantages of the present disclosure will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in light of the following Detailed Description and Drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
Referring additionally to
Each razor blade 14 can be mounted on a support 22. Portions of the support 22 are in elongated slots 24 of the frame. Spring fingers 26 of the frame provide a spring force to urge the razor blade to its at-rest position and to permit movement of the razor blade relative to the frame away from an at-rest position along the elongated slots in response to forces encountered during a normal shaving operation. In another embodiment, the support can be omitted and the razor blade can include a bent portion. The razor blade can be an approximate “L” shape in a transverse cross section as is known in the art.
Referring now to
The cartridge retainer 16 includes a second portion 36 preferably integrally formed with the first portion to provide a monolithic structure. The second portion 36 includes a datum surface 38 that defines the at-rest position of the razor blade (see
In other embodiments of the cartridge retainer, other means for fixedly attaching the cartridge retainer to the frame can be employed in addition to, or in the alternate to the third tab 42, which can be omitted. For example the cartridge retainer can be attached by use of a suitable adhesive between the frame and the cartridge retainer. A suitable adhesive is a cyanoacrylate (CA) adhesive, e.g. LOCTITE 401 or LOCTITE 420 manufactured by HENKEL. Other suitable adhesives include epoxy adhesives, e.g. a two-part epoxy. Referring now to
The cartridge retainer 16 is preferably manufactured by a perforation and forming process and is preferably manufactured from aluminum, most preferably the grade designated AL 5052-H16 and having a thickness about 0.3 mm. The cartridge retainer is preferably aluminum as this can act as a sacrificial anode in use and can provide galvanic protection to inhibit corrosion of the razor blade. However the present disclosure is not limited in regard of the material or manufacturing method of the cartridge retainer and alternatives are within the scope of the present disclosure. The cartridge retainer preferably comprises a relatively rigid, high strength and impact resistant material such as a metal (e.g. the aforementioned aluminum) or a so-called “engineering grade” thermoplastic. The cartridge retainer provides structural stability to the frame, especially in the event that a safety razor having a razor cartridge of the present disclosure, and having the separable lubrication in the locked position, is accidentally dropped. One of skill in the art will understand that molded thermoplastic materials such as glass fiber or carbon fiber reinforced NYLON can be used in the alternative for the cartridge retainer.
The cartridge retainer 16 can also be provided with a coating. It is preferred that the coating be on the outer surface and that the cartridge retainer 16 is uncoated on its underside to provide the aforementioned galvanic protection for the blades. It is preferred that the coating is a polymer coating formed from materials such as polyester, epoxy or two-layer vinyl and polyester systems. The coating can also be an anodized coating. Because the cartridge retainer 16 includes a skin contacting surface it is desirable that the coating provide low friction characteristics.
From the above it should be evident that the razor cartridge 10 includes structure which is simple to manufacture and assemble, and which will withstand the rigors of inadvertent dropping or other mishaps.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. For instance, modifications or changes as can be made within the scope of the attached claims and features disclosed in connection with any one embodiment can be used alone or in combination with each feature of the respective other embodiments. Thus, the breadth and scope of any embodiment should not be limited by any of the above described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,309, filed May 1, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,191,263 which claims the benefit U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/049,608, filed May 1, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
979296 | Heissenberger | Dec 1910 | A |
1741891 | Vallon | Dec 1929 | A |
2677883 | Schallgruber | May 1954 | A |
3895437 | DiBuono | Jul 1975 | A |
4586255 | Jacobson | May 1986 | A |
4625402 | Kavoussi | Dec 1986 | A |
6032372 | Dischler | Mar 2000 | A |
6161287 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6216345 | Andrews | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7197825 | Walker et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7540088 | Takeshita | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7690122 | Worrick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7802353 | Gratsias et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7877879 | Nakasuka | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20060143925 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070056167 | Richard et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080209734 | Nicoll | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090188112 | Prochaska et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211099 | Louis | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100107416 | Follo | May 2010 | A1 |
20110119922 | Ntavos et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1935588 | Jun 2008 | EP |
WO 2008 053814 | May 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100077619 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61049608 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12434309 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 12570668 | US |