Shaving systems often consist of a handle and a cartridge in which one or more blades are mounted in a plastic housing. In some cases, the blades are held in place in the housing by a pair of metallic clips, mounted at opposite ends of the length of the blades.
Most modern razor cartridges include one to five razor blades disposed between a guard and a cap. The cutting edge of each razor blade is positioned adjacent a plane that tangentially intersects the contact surfaces of the guard and the cap. This plane, referred to as the “contact plane,” represents the theoretical position of the surface being shaved. The position of a razor blade's cutting edge relative to the contact plane is described in terms of the “exposure” of the cutting edge. A cutting edge with “positive exposure” is one that extends through the contact plane and into the area normally occupied by the object being shaved. A cutting edge with “negative exposure” is one that is positioned below the plane and therefore does not intersect the contact plane. A cutting edge with “neutral exposure” is one that is contiguous with the contact plane. Generally, positioning the cutting edge of a blade at a positive exposure has been found to improve closeness, but potentially also increases the chance of skin irritation. On the other hand, neutral or negative blade exposure tends to reduce the likelihood of irritation, but also tends to decrease the closeness of the shave.
The overall blade geometry of the cartridge, including blade exposure and other factors such as blade span, affects the comfort and closeness of the shave obtained with the razor, as well as the likelihood of nicks and cuts during shaving. As will be discussed further below, comfort and closeness is also impacted by “skin management,” i.e., the way in which the skin bulge contacted by the blade edges is affected by other elements of the razor, including the guard that is provided at the leading edge of most razor cartridges.
In general, the present disclosure pertains to razor cartridges (also known as blade units), and to shaving assemblies that include such cartridges.
In one aspect, the invention features a razor cartridge comprising (a) a frame defining a base, said frame having an opening defined in part by a composite guard having a leading guard surface and a cap having a trailing cap surface, said leading guard surface and said trailing cap surface cooperating to define a contact plane tangential thereto and extending across said opening; and (b) at least three razor blades attached to said base, said razor blades being fixedly spaced. The cutting edge of the razor blade closest to the leading guard surface has a cutting edge exposure relative to said contact plane that is positive, and the cutting edge exposures of the other razor blades become less positive from said leading guard surface to said cap.
By “composite guard,” we mean a guard that includes a flexible elastomeric portion and a rigid or semi-rigid supporting portion that is closer to the blades than the flexible elastomeric portion and that is the last skin-engaging surface prior to the blades.
Some implementations include one or more of the following features.
The razor cartridge may include four or more blades, e.g., five blades.
The composite guard may include an elastomeric guard bar having a skin contacting surface, and a rigid guard bar support defining said leading guard surface, wherein the rigid guard bar support is proximal to the cutting edge of the razor blade closest to the leading guard surface. In some cases, the skin contacting surface of the elastomeric guard bar is higher than an uppermost surface of the rigid guard bar support, e.g., by about 0.05 to 0.5 mm, preferably by about 0.2 to 0.3 mm.
In some implementations, the cartridge has a pivot point that is closer to the trailing cap surface than to the leading guard surface. The pivot point may be below a lowermost portion of the blades.
In preferred implementations, the blades are spaced relatively close together. At least two of the blades may have an inter-blade span that is less than about 0.9 mm, e.g., from about 0.75 to 0.85 mm. The primary span, i.e., the distance between a leading edge of the leading guard surface and the cutting edge closest to the leading guard surface may be from about 0.3 to 0.75 mm, e.g., from about 0.35 to 0.45 mm.
In some implementations, the blades are bent blades, and the blades are fixedly supported within the frame such that the blades are not intended to move relative to the frame during shaving.
In another aspect, the invention features a razor cartridge comprising (a) a frame defining a base, said frame having an opening defined in part by a guard having a leading guard surface and a cap having a trailing cap surface, said leading guard surface and said trailing cap surface cooperating to define a contact plane tangential thereto and extending across said opening; and (b) at least three razor blades attached to said base, said razor blades being fixedly spaced. The cutting edge of the razor blade closest to the leading guard surface has a cutting edge exposure relative to said contact plane that is positive, the cutting edge exposure of the cutting edges of the other razor blades become less positive from said leading guard surface to said cap, and one or more of the blades has a cutting edge exposure that is negative or neutral.
In some implementations, razor cartridges according to this aspect of the invention may include any one or more of the features disclosed above.
In other aspects, the invention features methods of contacting the skin with the razor cartridges described herein, and methods of manufacturing razor cartridges.
Referring to
The elastomeric guard bar 19 is higher than the guard bar support 21, and is also higher than the cutting edge of the blade that is closest to the guard bar support (hereafter referred to as the “primary blade.”) In some preferred implementations, the skin contacting surface of the elastomeric guard bar is higher than an uppermost surface of the rigid guard bar support by at least 0.05 mm, e.g., from about 0.05 to 0.5 mm or in some cases from about 0.2 to 0.3 mm higher. This height allows the elastomeric guard bar to stretch the skin prior to the skin contacting the primary blade, thereby managing the skin bulge and reducing the tendency of the primary blade to nick the skin. The rigid guard bar support then supports and manages the skin again prior to contact between the skin and the primary blade, setting the skin up for blade contact.
Blades 18 are positioned relative to each other and relative to the cutting plane discussed in the Background section above (plane Pc in
Referring to
Referring to
Blades 18 are preferably bent blades, as shown in
It is also preferred that the blades be fixed blades, rather than “sprung” blades (e.g., blades of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,270,268.) Thus, the blades are positioned by their placement in the slots of the blade positioning elements and held in place by the clips such that their position relative to the housing does not change during shaving.
The distance between the cutting edges of adjacent blades, referred to herein as inter-blade span (Si,
The primary span (Sp,
The skin management provided by the features discussed above contributes to the ability to have a primary blade with a positive exposure relative to the cutting plane without compromising user comfort. Preferably, the primary blade is positive by at least 0.02 mm, preferably by at least 0.025, e.g., at least 0.035 mm, and in some cases by about 0.04 mm or more. In some implementations, the primary blade could be positive by as much as 0.1 mm. As shown in
The cartridge is designed to pivot in a manner that takes advantage of this blade exposure arrangement by causing shaving forces to be relatively evenly distributed over the blades during shaving, with somewhat less force being applied to the primary blade. By applying more force to the negative and neutral blades and less to the primary blade, shaving comfort is enhanced without deleteriously affecting closeness.
Referring to
The pivot axis is also positioned below a lowermost portion of the base portions of the blades. This positioning allows the cartridge to have a small footprint.
The housing 12 can be made of any suitable material including, for example, amorphous blends of polyphenylene ether and polystyrene, e.g., polymers sold under the tradename NORYL resins, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET or PETE), high density (HD) PETE, thermoplastic polymer, polypropylene, oriented polypropylene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyester, high-gloss polyester, nylon, or any combination thereof. The cap 14 is preferably formed of the same material as the housing.
The clips can be made of metals (preferably Aluminum, aluminum alloys) or other malleable material.
The guard, including the elastomeric portion of the composite guard, may be made of any suitable materials, e.g., as described in U.S. Application No. 61/983,790, filed Apr. 24, 2014.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
For example, the cartridge may have more or fewer than five blades. Moreover, the exposure of the blades other than the primary blade may in some implementations be different from the progression described above.
As another example, while a composite guard bar consisting of an elastomeric guard bar and a rigid guard bar support has been described above, other types of guard bars may be used.
Moreover, while a generally rectangular cartridge is shown in the Figures, other shapes can be used, e.g., oval.
Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/247,712, filed Dec. 21, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/324,245, filed Jan. 5, 2017, issued on Mar. 30, 2021, as U.S. Pat. No. 10,960,558 which is a U.S. national phase application of PCT Application Ser. No. PCT/US2015/38543, filed Jun. 30, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/023,419, filed Jul. 11, 2014, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3871073 | Nissen et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
4270268 | Jacobson | Jun 1981 | A |
4345374 | Jacobson | Aug 1982 | A |
4403412 | Trotta | Sep 1983 | A |
4516320 | Peleckis | May 1985 | A |
4621424 | Jacobson | Nov 1986 | A |
4854043 | Chen | Aug 1989 | A |
5063667 | Jacobson | Nov 1991 | A |
5092042 | Miller et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5224267 | Simms et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5369885 | Ferraro | Dec 1994 | A |
5813293 | Apprille, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6161288 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6185822 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216349 | Gilder et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6295734 | Gilder et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6651342 | Walker, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
D514253 | Gray | Jan 2006 | S |
7131202 | Pennell et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7200937 | Richard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210229 | Coffin | May 2007 | B2 |
7322109 | Newkirk et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7448135 | Zhuk et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8061039 | Kwiecien et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8209869 | Royle | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8273205 | Murgida et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8336212 | Bozikis et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8448339 | Walker, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8782903 | Clark et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
D731708 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
9308657 | Bruno | Apr 2016 | B2 |
D764100 | Park et al. | Aug 2016 | S |
9475201 | Georgakis et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
D776875 | Ren et al. | Jan 2017 | S |
9718200 | Dryfhout | Aug 2017 | B2 |
11059193 | Bozikis | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11059195 | Nicholas | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11077570 | Dryfhout | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20020157259 | Coffin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040134072 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050015991 | Follo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050198840 | Worrick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060277759 | Follo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080256803 | Tucker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090083982 | Forsdike | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110146079 | Clarke | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162208 | Wain | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110232100 | Park et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120210586 | Lelieveld et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120317818 | Oglesby et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130081291 | Wain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130160305 | Howell et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160306 | Howell et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160307 | Howell | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150013169 | Warrick | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150090085 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150101195 | Long et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160167242 | Noh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170203451 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20130125538 | Nov 2013 | KR |
2013168894 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application No. PCT/US2015/038543, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2015, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240083047 A1 | Mar 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62023419 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17247712 | Dec 2020 | US |
Child | 18319313 | US | |
Parent | 15324245 | US | |
Child | 17247712 | US |