This disclosure relates generally to medical treatment systems and, more particularly but not by way of limitation, to re-epithelialization wound dressings and systems.
The physiological process of wound healing involves different phases that may occur simultaneously or sequentially. As used herein, “or” does not require mutual exclusivity. Two phases of the wound healing process involve granulation (proliferation) and re-epithelialization.
Improvements to certain aspects of wound care dressings, methods, and systems are addressed by the present invention as shown and described in a variety of illustrative, non-limiting embodiments herein. According to an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a re-epithelialization dressing for use with reduced pressure includes a moist tissue-interface layer, a manifold member, and a sealing member. The moist tissue-interface layer is adapted to provide a moisture balance for the tissue and is formed with a plurality of apertures. The manifold is operable to distribute reduced pressure and is disposed between the sealing member and the moist tissue-interface layer.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a system for promoting re-epithelialization of a wound includes a re-epithelialization wound dressing. The re-epithelialization wound dressing includes a moist tissue-interface layer, a manifold member, and a sealing member. The moist tissue-interface layer is adapted to provide a moisture balance for the tissue and is formed with a plurality of apertures. The manifold is operable to distribute reduced pressure and is disposed between the sealing member and the moist tissue-interface layer. The system further includes a reduced-pressure connector, a reduced-pressure delivery conduit, and a reduced-pressure source to provide reduced pressure to the re-epithelialization wound dressing. The reduced-pressure delivery conduit is operable to fluidly couple the reduced-pressure source to the reduced-pressure connector.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method for promoting re-epithelialization of a wound includes the steps of: deploying a re-epithelialization dressing proximate the wound; fluidly coupling a reduced-pressure delivery conduit to the re-epithelialization dressing; and providing reduced pressure to the reduced-pressure delivery conduit. The re-epithelialization dressing includes a moist tissue-interface layer operable to provide a moisture balance. The moist tissue-interface layer has a first side and a second, tissue-facing side and is formed with a plurality of apertures. The re-epithelialization dressing further includes a manifold member for distributing reduced pressure. The manifold member has a first side and a second, tissue-facing side. The re-epithelialization dressing also includes a sealing member, which has a first side and a second, tissue-facing side. The manifold member is disposed between the sealing member and the moist tissue-interface layer.
Other features and advantages of the illustrative embodiments will become apparent with reference to the drawings and detailed description that follow.
In the following detailed description of the illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments are defined only by the appended claims.
Referring primarily to
The re-epithelialization, or epithelialization, phase of acute wound healing involves resurfacing of the wound 106 and changes in the wound edges 112. The process protects a patient's body from invasion by outside organisms and may occur concurrently with other phases if not restricted. The resurfacing aspect involves keratinocytes.
Among other things, keratinocytes form layers of the dermis and epidermis. Keratinocytes are derived from epidermal stem cells located in the bulge area of hair follicles and migrate from that location into the basal layers of epidermis. The keratinocytes proliferate and differentiate to produce epidermis and thereby replenish the epidermis. Keratinocytes may respond to signals released from growth factors, which may be in wound exudate, by advancing in a sheet to resurface a space. Because of this migration, a moist wound environment may speed or otherwise facilitate the migration of keratinocytes toward one another from the wound edges 112. The wound treatment system 100 promotes this re-epithelialization phase or process.
The wound treatment system 100 includes a reduced-pressure connector 114 that may be associated with the re-epithelialization dressing 102 for providing reduced pressure to at least a portion of the re-epithelialization dressing 102. A reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116 may be fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure connector 114 at a first end 118 and fluidly coupled to a reduced-pressure source 120 at a second end 122. One or more devices 124 may be fluidly coupled between the reduced-pressure connector 114 and the reduced-pressure source 120, such as on the reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116.
The device or devices 124 that may be fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116 include, for example, without limitation, a fluid reservoir (or collection member, to hold exudates and other fluids removed), a pressure-feedback device, a volume detection system, a blood detection system, an infection detection system, a flow monitoring system, a temperature monitoring system, or other device.
The reduced-pressure source 120 provides reduced pressure as a part of the wound treatment system 100. The term “reduced pressure” as used herein generally refers to a pressure less than the ambient pressure at the tissue site 104 that is being subjected to treatment. In most cases, this reduced pressure will be less than the atmospheric pressure at which the patient is located. Alternatively, the reduced pressure may be less than a hydrostatic pressure of tissue at the tissue site 104. Although the terms “vacuum” and “negative pressure” may be used to describe the pressure applied to the tissue site, the actual pressure applied to the tissue site may be significantly more than the pressure normally associated with a complete vacuum. Unless otherwise indicated, values of pressure stated herein are gauge pressures.
The reduced pressure delivered by the reduced-pressure source 120 may be constant or varied (patterned or random) and may be delivered continuously or intermittently. In order to maximize patient mobility and ease, the reduced-pressure source 120 may be a battery-powered, reduced-pressure generator. This facilitates application in the operating room and provides mobility and convenience for the patient during the rehabilitation phase. Other sources of reduced pressure may be utilized, such as V.A.C.® therapy unit, which is available from KCl of San Antonio, Tex., wall suction, or a mechanical unit.
The reduced pressure developed by the reduced-pressure source 120 is delivered through the reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116, or medical conduit or tubing, to the reduced-pressure connector 114. An interposed hydrophobic membrane filter may be interspersed between the reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116 and the reduced-pressure source 120. In another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment (not shown), the reduced-pressure source may be contained within the re-epithelialization dressing 102 and may be, for example, a micro-pump.
Referring now primarily to
The moist tissue-interface layer 126 has a first side 136 and a second, tissue-facing side 138. The moist tissue-interface layer 126 is formed with a first plurality of apertures 140, which may take any shape. The first plurality of apertures 140 extend through the moist tissue-interface layer 126. The first plurality of apertures 140 may be formed with a laser, punched, drilled, or formed by casting, or any other technique. The first plurality of apertures 140 may be formed with a uniform pattern or may be random and may have uniform or varied diameters.
In one illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the first plurality of apertures 140 are formed with a uniform pattern with aperture centers 141 being formed with a distance 142 between adjacent aperture centers 141. In some illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, the distance 142 is about two millimeters, three millimeters, four millimeters, five millimeters, six millimeters, seven millimeters, eight millimeters, nine millimeters, ten millimeters, or more. The distance 142 may be selected for the desired liquid transmission through the moist tissue-interface layer 126. The diameter of the first plurality of apertures 140 may also be selected so that when reduced pressure is applied and saturation occurs (at least in some embodiments), the first plurality of apertures 140 will not firmly collapse and seal but will become restricted to allow liquid to pass but to generally restrict the passing of gases through the first plurality of apertures 140. In other embodiments, the first plurality of apertures 140 may be sized to allow the first plurality of apertures 140 to close completely and firmly under the influence of reduced pressure.
The moist tissue-interface layer 126 may be made from numerous materials. The moist tissue-interface layer 126 may be, for example, a water-based material, such as a hydrogel or hydrocolloid. The material from which the moist tissue-interface layer 126 is formed provides a fluid balance, or equilibrium, with respect to a desired moist condition. Thus, for example, the material may provide moisture when needed (i.e., the tissue site 104 is dry) and will absorb moisture when needed (i.e., excessive moisture exists at the tissue site 104 or the tissue site 104 is substantially wet). The second, tissue-facing side 138 may be a relatively smooth surface as compared to a micro-strain inducing material, such as an open-cell foam. The relatively smooth surface of the second, tissue-facing side 138 helps to promote (or at least not hinder) cell migration. The relatively smooth surface of the second, tissue-facing side 138 may create little or no local micro-strain. The moist environment provided by the moist tissue-interface layer 126, fluid management of the first plurality of apertures 140, and the relatively smooth surface of the second, tissue-facing side 138 may encourage re-epithelialization of the wound 106.
In other illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, other materials may be used for the moist tissue-interface layer 126, such as a very dense hydrophilic foam (e.g., a hydrophilic closed cell foam); a film-coated, perforated, non-woven material; a hydrogel-impregnated foam; a hydroactive dressing material, or other material. The hydrogel-impregnated foam may be particularly well suited for deeper wounds or difficult shapes. The moist tissue-interface layer 126 may be perforated or cut into sections that allow removal of one or more portions of the moist tissue-interface layer 126 in order to provide reduced pressure to a portion or the tissue site 104. An opening created by the removed section may help with a highly exudating wound or may promote granulation if desired in an area of the wound 106.
In use, the moist tissue-interface layer 126 will typically swell as the moist tissue-interface layer 126 receives fluid under reduced pressure. With sufficient fluid, the moist tissue-interface layer 126 may become saturated. As shown in
The re-epithelialization dressing 102 may include an optional support layer 128. The support layer 128 has a first side 144 and a second, tissue-facing side 146. The second, tissue-facing side 146 is disposed adjacent to the first side 136 of the moist tissue-interface layer 126. The moist tissue-interface layer 126 and the support layer 128 may be coupled. As used herein, the term “coupled” includes coupling via a separate object and includes direct coupling. The term “coupled” also encompasses two or more components that are continuous with one another by virtue of each of the components being formed from the same piece of material. Also, the term “coupled” may include chemical, such as via a chemical bond, mechanical, thermal, or electrical coupling. The term “coupled” may include any known technique, including, without limitation, welding (e.g., ultrasonic or RF welding), bonding, adhesives, cements, or other techniques or devices. Fluid coupling means that fluid is in communication between the designated parts or locations.
The support layer 128 is optional but may be added to provide support for the moist tissue-interface layer 126. As shown best by comparing
The re-epithelialization dressing 102 includes the manifold member 130. The manifold member 130 has a first side 152 and a second, tissue-facing side 154. The manifold member 130 may be formed from any material that distributes fluids, including reduced pressure. The term “manifold” as used herein generally refers to a substance or structure that is provided to assist in applying reduced pressure to, delivering fluids to, or removing fluids from a tissue site 104. The manifold member 130 typically includes a plurality of flow channels or pathways that distribute fluids provided to and removed from the tissue site 104 around the manifold member 130. In one illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the flow channels or pathways are interconnected to improve distribution of fluids provided or removed from the tissue site 104.
The manifold member 130 may include, for example, without limitation, devices that have structural elements arranged to form flow channels, such as, for example, cellular foam, open-cell foam, porous tissue collections, liquids, gels, and foams that include, or cure to include, flow channels. The manifold member 130 may be porous and may be made from foam, gauze, felted mat, or any other material suited to a particular biological application. In one illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the manifold member 130 is a porous foam and includes a plurality of interconnected cells or pores that act as flow channels. The porous foam may be a polyurethane, open-cell, reticulated foam, such as GranuFoam® material manufactured by Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated of San Antonio, Tex. Other embodiments may include “closed cells.” In one non-limiting illustration, a manifold member 130 is formed of a non-woven material, such as a non-woven material available from Libeltex BVBA of Belgium. The second, tissue-facing side 154 of the manifold member 130 is disposed adjacent to the first side 144 of the support layer 128 in one illustrative, non-limiting embodiment or adjacent to the first side 136 of the moist tissue-interface layer 126 in another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment.
The re-epithelialization dressing 102 includes the sealing member 132. The sealing member 132 has a first side 158 and a second, tissue-facing side 160. The sealing member 132 forms a sealed space over the tissue site 104 or wound 106. The second, tissue-facing side 160 is disposed adjacent to and may be coupled to the first side 152 of the manifold member 130 or another layer. The sealing member 132 may be formed from any material that provides a fluid seal. “Fluid seal,” or “seal,” means a seal adequate to maintain reduced pressure at a desired site given the particular reduced-pressure source or subsystem involved. The sealing member may, for example, be an impermeable or semi-permeable, elastomeric material. “Elastomeric” means having the properties of an elastomer. Elastomeric generally refers to a polymeric material that has rubber-like properties. More specifically, most elastomers have ultimate elongations greater than 100% and a significant amount of resilience. The resilience of a material refers to the material's ability to recover from an elastic deformation. Examples of elastomers may include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, polyisoprene, styrene butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, polybutadiene, nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene monomer, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, polysulfide rubber, polyurethane, EVA film, co-polyester, and silicones. Additional examples of sealing member materials include a silicone drape, 3M Tegaderm® drape, acrylic drape, such as one available from Avery Dennison, or an incise drape.
Referring now primarily to
In operation, according to an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the tissue site 104, and in particular the wound 106, may be treated with the wound treatment system 100 by deploying the re-epithelialization dressing 102. The re-epithelialization dressing 102 is placed adjacent to the wound 106 and a portion of the patient's intact epidermis 108. If not already installed, the reduced-pressure connector 114 is fluidly coupled to the re-epithelialization dressing 102 to provide reduced pressure and, if not already deployed, the sealing member 132 is deployed over other portions of the re-epithelialization dressing 102. The second, tissue-facing side 138 of the moist tissue-interface layer 126 is thus disposed adjacent to the wound 106 and a portion of the intact epidermis 108 as shown in
If not already installed, the reduced-pressure delivery conduit 116 is fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure connector 114 and to the reduced-pressure source 120. The reduced-pressure source 120 is activated and reduced pressure is thereby supplied to the re-epithelialization dressing 102. The reduced pressure may help to hold the re-epithelialization dressing 102 in situ, may help avoid any fluid leaks from the re-epithelialization dressing 102, may help avoid infection, and may help to manage fluids.
Typically, the reduced pressure provided to the re-epithelialization dressing 102 is in the range of −10 to −100 mm Hg and more typically in the range of −25 to −75 mm Hg. The reduced pressure is adequate to cause a flow of fluid, but is not typically high enough to cause substantial micro-strain at the tissue site 104. In other illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, the reduced pressure may be between the range of −10 mm Hg and −200 mm Hg. In other illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the reduced pressure may be in the range of −100 to −200 mm Hg for an initial time period and then be in the range of −25 to −100 mm Hg for a second time period. Other variations are possible as desired.
When reduced pressure is provided to the re-epithelialization dressing 102, the first plurality of apertures 140 may go immediately or over time with saturation from an open position (
The reduced pressure delivered to the re-epithelialization dressing 102 helps to remove excess fluids from the tissue site 104 and helps to remove fluids from the moist tissue-interface layer 126 when the moist tissue-interface layer 126 becomes substantially saturated. The fluid balance, or equilibrium, of the moist tissue-interface layer 126 also helps manage fluid in that the moist tissue-interface layer 126 provides fluid when the tissue site 104 is dry or helps absorb fluids when the tissue site 104 is wet. The fluid removal by the moist tissue-interface layer 126 may be slowly accomplished to allow some exudate (but not pooling of exudate) to remain at the tissue site 104 to facilitate the healing process. The exudate may help by allowing signaling (e.g., from growth factors) to activate keratinocytes as previously mentioned.
The moist tissue-interface layer 126 also provides a relatively smooth surface against the tissue site 104 that may facilitate (or at least not inhibit) cell migration. In addition to providing a relatively smooth moist surface, the moist tissue-interface layer 126 may be left for extended periods of time against the tissue site 104 without granulation in-growth, infection, or the need for frequent dressing changes.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been disclosed in the context of certain illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, permutations, and alterations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. It will be appreciated that any feature that is described in connection to any one embodiment may also be applicable to any other embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/171,165, filed Feb. 3, 2014, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/857,100, filed Aug. 16, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,690,844, issued Apr. 8, 2014, which claims the benefit, under 35 USC § 119(e), of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/237,486, entitled “Re-Epithelialization Wound Dressings and Systems,” filed Aug. 27, 2009. Each of the applications above are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans | Jul 1954 | A |
2910763 | Lauterbach | Nov 1959 | A |
2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower Guiles, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233969 | Lock | Nov 1980 | A |
4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
4525166 | Leclerc | Jun 1985 | A |
4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4551139 | Plaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4710165 | McNeil | Dec 1987 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed | Mar 1990 | A |
4919654 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5018515 | Gilman | May 1991 | A |
5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5106629 | Cartmell | Apr 1992 | A |
5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160315 | Heinecke | Nov 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami | Dec 1992 | A |
5176663 | Svedman | Jan 1993 | A |
5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki | Mar 1994 | A |
5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5356372 | Donovan | Oct 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5423737 | Cartmell | Jun 1995 | A |
5437622 | Carlon | Aug 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd | Aug 1995 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5844013 | Kenndoff | Dec 1998 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6420622 | Johnston | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566575 | Stickels | May 2003 | B1 |
6685681 | Lockwood | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7004915 | Boynton | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7070584 | Johnson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7651484 | Heaton | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7790945 | Watson, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7846141 | Weston | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8062273 | Weston | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8172816 | Kazala, Jr. | May 2012 | B2 |
8216198 | Heagle et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251979 | Malhi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8257327 | Blott et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8398614 | Blott et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449509 | Weston | May 2013 | B2 |
8529548 | Blott et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535296 | Blott et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551060 | Schuessler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568386 | Malhi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8679081 | Heagle et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690844 | Locke | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8834451 | Blott et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8926592 | Blott et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9017302 | Vitaris et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9198801 | Weston | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9211365 | Weston | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9289542 | Blott et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
10052236 | Locke | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20010043943 | Coffey | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132540 | Soerens | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030203011 | Abuelyaman | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030232905 | Ives | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030304 | Hunt | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040243073 | Lockwood | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037194 | Greene | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064021 | Rippon | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085795 | Lockwood | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050137539 | Biggie | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050228329 | Boehringer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060041247 | Petrosenko | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060155260 | Blott | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173253 | Ganapathy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189910 | Johnson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060264796 | Flick | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070055209 | Patel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070185426 | Ambrosio | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219532 | Karpowicz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011368 | Singh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039763 | Sigurjonsson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080076844 | Van Sumeren | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080215020 | Reeves | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300555 | Olson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043268 | Eddy | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090227969 | Jaeb | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254066 | Heaton | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275922 | Coulthard | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306630 | Locke | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100125258 | Coulthard | May 2010 | A1 |
20110054422 | Locke | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110230848 | Manwaring | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110288512 | Locke | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120016323 | Robinson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046624 | Locke | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140163491 | Schuessler et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150080788 | Blott et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
550575 | Mar 1986 | AU |
745271 | Mar 2002 | AU |
755496 | Dec 2002 | AU |
2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
26 40 413 | Mar 1978 | DE |
43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
29 504 378 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1018967 | Jul 2000 | EP |
692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2 329 127 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
4129536 | Aug 2008 | JP |
71559 | Apr 2002 | SG |
8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
90010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
93009727 | May 1993 | WO |
94020041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PhD; Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Clinical Experience; Annals of Plastic Surgery; vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1997; pp. 563-576. |
Susan Mendez-Eatmen, RN; “When wounds Won't Heal” RN January 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24. |
James H. Blackburn II, MD et al.: Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philidelphia, PA, USA. |
John Masters; “Reliable, Inexpensive and Simple Suction Dressings”; Letter to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1998, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/The British Association of Plastic Surgeons, UK. |
S.E. Greer, et al. “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of the Groin” British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), 53, pp. 484-487. |
George V. Letsou, MD., et al; “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Stretch”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 31, 1990, pp. 634-639. |
Orringer, Jay, et al; “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB95/01983; dated Nov. 23, 1995. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jan. 8, 1999. |
PCT Written Opinion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jun. 8, 1999. |
PCT International Examination and Search Report, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Jan. 15, 1998 & Apr. 29, 1997. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Sep. 3, 1997. |
Dattilo, Philip P., JR., et al; “Medical Textiles: Application of an Absorbable Barbed Bi-directional Surgical Suture”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al; “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Management of Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986, pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation Mastitis”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1986, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof. |
Yusupov. Yu.N., et al; “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnki Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu.A., et al; “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirugi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu.A., et al; “Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds by Means of Vacuum Therapy”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al; “Effective Management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-63. |
Egnell Minor, Instruction Book, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24. |
Egnell Minor: Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns all Egnell Pumps, Feb. 3, 1983, pp. 2. |
Svedman, P.: “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534. |
Chinn, Steven D. et al.: “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 24, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81. |
Arnljots, Björn et al.: “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of Intractable Leg Ulcers”, Scand J. Plast Reconstr. Surg., No. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213. |
Svedman, P.: “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment of a Biosurface”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221. |
Svedman, P. et al: “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for Continuous of Intermittent Irrigation”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133. |
N.A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External Vacuum Aspiration in the Treatment of Purulent Diseases of Soft Tissues,” Current Problems in Modern Clinical Surgery: Interdepartmental Collection, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986); pp. 94-96 (certified translation). |
K.F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M. Chariker, “Managing Draining Wounds and Fistulae: New and Established Methods,” Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Management Publications, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246. |
G. {hacek over (Z)}ivadinovi?, V. ?uki?, {hacek over (Z)}. Maksimovi?, ?. Radak, and P. Pe{hacek over (s)}ka, “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Blood Vessels,” Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (certified translation). |
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain,” Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585. |
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, Vacuum Therapy of Trophic Ulcers of the Lower Leg with Simultaneous Autoplasty of the Skin (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (certified translation). |
M. Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A.G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen,” British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370. |
D.E. Tribble, An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction, Archives of Surgery 105 (1972) pp. 511-513. |
M.J. Morykwas, L.C. Argenta, E.I. Shelton-Brown, and W. McGuirt, “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies and Basic Foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 38 (1997), pp. 553-562 (Morykwas I). |
C.E. Tennants, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremities and Thorax,”Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549. |
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in Surgery, Medicine, and the Specialties: A Manual of its Practical Application, (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211. |
V.A. Solovev et al., Guidelines, The Method of Treatment of Immature External Fistulas in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, editor-in-chief Prov. V.I. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Solovev Guidelines”). |
V.A. Kuznetsov & N.a. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption Treatment of Open Septic Wounds,” in II All-Union Conference on Wounds and Wound Infections: Presentation Abstracts, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenok et al. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”). |
V.A. Solovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures after Gastric Resection (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Solovev Abstract”). |
V.A.C.® Therapy Clinical Guidelines: A Reference Source for Clinicians; Jul. 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180318138 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61237486 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12857100 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 14171165 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14171165 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 16039111 | US |