Wipes have been made from a variety of materials which can be dry or wet when used. Perhaps the most common form of wipes has been a stack of moistened sheets which have been packaged in a plastic container and are known as wet wipes. Typically, the wipes have had linear (e.g., straight) or non-linear (e.g., curved or zigzagged) edges and a generally rectangular to square configurations. The wipes have also been available in either folded or unfolded configurations. For example, stacks of wipes have been available wherein each of the wipes in the stack have been arranged in a folded configuration such as a c-folded, z-folded or quarter-folded configuration, as are well known to those skilled in the art. Each folded wipe can be interfolded with the wipes immediately above and below in the stack of wipes. Such wipes have been formed as discrete wipes that are separate from one another upon formation into a stack of wipes and are intended to not interact with one another upon dispensing. In addition, the wipes have been in the form of continuous webs of material which include perforations to separate the individual wipes and which are wound into rolls and packaged in plastic is containers. Such wipes have been used for baby wipes, hand wipes, household cleaning wipes, industrial wipes and the like. The wet wipes have been made from a variety of materials and are moistened with a suitable wiping solution.
The conventional packages which contain stacks of wipes, such as those described above, have been designed to provide one at a time dispensing which can be accomplished using a single hand. Such single handed, one at a time dispensing is particularly desirable because the other hand of the user is typically required to be simultaneously used for other functions. For example, when changing a diaper product on an infant, the user typically uses one hand to hold and maintain the infant in a desired position while the other hand is searching for a wet wipe, such as a baby wipe, to clean the infant.
However, the dispensing of wipes in such stacks has not been completely satisfactory. For example, users of the wipes have had difficulties recognizing and grasping the edges of each individual wipe to dispense or remove the wet wipe from the package. This problem has been particularly acute when the individual wipes in the stack are folded such that the leading edge of each wipe is folded over upon another portion of the wipe. Typically, the user will frictionally drag from one to three fingers across the top surface of the stack of wet wipes in an attempt to peelingly lift the leading end edge of the top wipe from the stack of wipes. However, the leading end edge of each wipe in such a folded configuration has tended to have an affinity for the other portions of the wipe, especially when the wipes have been arranged in a stacked configuration for a period of time, and/or when the wipes are wet wipes due to adhesion caused by the moistening solution. As a result, in use, it has been undesirably difficult for the user to peelingly lift the leading end edge of each wipe from the other portions of the wipe to facilitate the dispensing of each wipe from the stack of wet wipes.
Moreover, as each wipe in the stack of wipes has been dispensed or removed from the stack, the trailing edge portion of the wipe has not always easily separated from the adjacent middle portion of the wipe. Such difficult separation has undesirably caused the user to exert additional force to unfold the wipe to gain full access to its surface area for wiping. Still additionally, in packages which contain a stack of individually folded wipes, each wipe has not always completely unfolded as it has been removed from the stack by the user. For example, various flap portions of the individually folded wipe have undesirably remained in a contacting relationship with the other portions of the wipe as the wipe has been removed. Such difficult separation and incomplete unfolding has undesirably resulted in reduced consumer acceptance. Without being limited to a theory of understanding, this is believe to occur because such existing wipes are intended to not interact with one another upon dispensing.
The difficulties encountered in dispensing the wipes has been particularly evident in stacks of wipes which have a solution add-on (i.e., wet wipes, and particularly wipes with greater solution add-on) and in stacks of wipes which have a greater number of wipes. For example, each wet wipe and, in particular, the edges of each wet wipe, have had an increased affinity for the other portions of the wet wipe and the adjacent wet wipe in the stack as the amount of solution in the stack increases. As a result, the consistency and reliability of the dispensing of such wet wipes has undesirably declined as the amount of solution has increased. Accordingly, it has been desired to provide a wipe and stack of wipes, each in a reach-in format, which have enhanced dispensability, particularly for wet wipes.
In response to the difficulties and problems discussed above, for example, a new relationship between two adjacent wipes enabling enhanced dispensing, and which may be more cost effective and reliable (e.g., reducing the likelihood of difficult wipe location and dispensing), has been developed. For example, dispensing can be enhanced or made easier when at least a leading portion of a wipe is ready for dispensing upon the opening of a resealable wipes dispenser after the initial opening of the dispenser and use of a first wipe in a plurality of wipes. That is, a leading edge of the top wipe can be more constantly positioned relative to the stack of wipes sufficiently extended upward so a user can readily find and grasp the edge and remove the entire individual wipe. Alternatively, dispensing can be made easier by mere loosening of the leading edge of the succeeding wipe to lessen the inherent adhesion force between the leading edge and the middle portion of the succeeding wipe. As another example, multiple wipes dispensing can occur when a leading individual wipe in a plurality of wipes does not timely separate completely from a following individual wipe at a joint between the adjacent wipes, i.e., before the leading wipe completely passes though the dispensing opening or orifice so that the following wipe falls back into the dispenser and remains at least partial separably joined to its following wipe in the stack of wipes for next dispensing. This can be desirable when two (or more) wipes are needed, but if only one is desired, then this is not preferred. As yet another example, dispensing can be enhanced or made easier when a folded wipe is readily extended to full length merely through the dispensing motion of a wipe because of the relationship with the following wipe. Additional features of the invention will be realized and attained by the product and processes particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof, as well as from the appended drawings. The purposes and features of the present invention will be set forth in and are apparent from the description that follows, as well as will be learned by practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the invention provides a stack of wipes for use in a reach-in wipes dispenser having a dispensing opening. The stack includes a plurality of wipes stacked upon each other. Each wipe is separably joined to an adjacent wipe to form a joint therebetween. For at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, dispensing a top wipe from the stack of wipes causes an adjacent following wipe to at least partially be drawn upwards towards and/or through the dispensing opening, and the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe at the joint before the following wipe completely passes through the dispensing opening, and when the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe the following wipe falls back towards the stack of wipes and is positioned within the dispenser and below the dispensing opening.
In another aspect, the invention provides a stack of wipes for use in a resealable reach-in wipes dispenser having a dispensing opening. The stack includes a plurality of wipes stacked upon each other. Each wipe of the plurality of wipes is separably joined to an adjacent wipe to form a joint therebetween, and each wipe is folded upon itself at least once forming a leading portion of the wipe before a first fold and a trailing portion of the wipe after a last fold. For at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, dispensing a top wipe from the stack of wipes causes an adjacent following wipe to at least partially be drawn upwards towards and/or through the dispensing opening, and the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe at the joint before the following wipe completely passes through the dispensing opening, and when the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe the following wipe falls back towards the stack of wipes and is positioned within the dispenser and below the dispensing opening. And, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, the leading portion of the following wipe stays below the dispensing opening during the time when the top wipe is being dispensed and until the top wipe is completely separated automatically from the following wipe and the following wipe then becomes the top wipe in the stack of wipes.
In other aspects, the invention provides a method for dispensing a stack of wet wipes from a resealable reach-in wipes dispenser having a dispensing opening. The is method includes the following steps: unsealing the reach-in wipes dispenser to gain access to a plurality of wipes stacked upon each other to form the stack of wipes, each wipe in the stack of wipes folded upon itself at least once and each wipe separably joined to an adjacent wipe to form a joint therebetween and each wipe being a wet wipe; locating a leading portion of a top wipe and withdrawing the leading portion through the dispensing opening; at least partially unfolding the top wipe as the leading portion is withdrawn through the dispensing opening; for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, drawing upwards at least a portion of the following wipe towards and/or through the dispensing opening wherein the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe at the joint before the following wipe completely passes through the dispensing opening such that when the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe the following wipe falls back towards the stack of wipes and is positioned within the dispenser and below the dispensing opening; and sealing the reach-in wipes dispenser.
In yet other aspects, the invention provides various configurations for the separably joined relationship, the wipes per se, and the wipes relative to other wipes such as in a stack of wipes, as well as, for use of wipes of the invention in various types of dispensers, e.g., rigid to non-rigid, and for dispensing in various manners and wipe positions and with dry to wet wipes.
A variety of definitions used throughout the specification are provided first, followed by a further description of aspects of the invention.
As used herein, “automatically” means that separation at the joint between adjacent wipes occurs as a result of the configuration and relationship of the wipes in the stack of wipes in response to the act of dispensing a top wipe from the stack of wipes. That is, external forces provided beyond the wipes in the stack of wipes, such as a user's second hand or a restrictive orifice of the dispenser to act upon the succeeding wipe(s), are not needed to separate the wipes of the invention.
As used herein, wipes of the invention are considered “separably joined”, “separably joining” (and variations thereof) when each wipe of a plurality, e.g., in a stack of wipes, is engaging any adjacent wipe while in the dispenser or package such that withdrawing the leading wipe through the dispenser or package opening also separates at least a portion of the following wipe from itself or portion of a succeeding wipe immediately below the portion of the following wipe being caused to separate by the leading wipe. Such engaging of any adjacent wipe can include an interfolded relationship or a non-interfolded relationship in combination with one or more of the following between adjacent wipes: adhesive, friction, fusion bonding (e.g., ultrasonic welding, heat sealing), mechanical entanglement (e.g., needle punching, steam sealing, embossing, crimping), autogeneous bonding, and/or weakened line(s) (e.g., perforations, zones of frangibility, score line(s), crush cutting).
As used herein, when the following wipe that has at least a portion through the opening of the dispenser or package is intentionally maintained in the opening after the leading wipe is completely separated from the following wipe, this is referred to as “pop-up” format or dispensing. To be intentionally maintained in the opening means the opening is configured to maintain the wipe in the opening between successive dispensing occasions, such as through use of a constricting orifice or opening being smaller than the wipe in at least one dimension of the wipe.
As used herein, “reach-in” dispensing is understood to mean having to fetch a wipe out of a dispenser through an opening substantially coextensive with the walls of the dispenser or through a restricted opening smaller than the perimeter defined by the walls. In either case, the top wipe for dispensing rests on top of the remainder of the stack of wipes and is not in a pop-up position but rather the top wipe needs to be retrieved from the remainder of the stack each time anew when dispensing is desired. An example of a reach-in dispenser is found in the currently available baby wipes product sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation of Neenah, Wis. under the trade name HUGGIES® Supreme Care.
As used herein, the term “wet wipe” refers to a fibrous sheet that has a liquid applied thereto during manufacture. The amount of liquid or solution contained within each wet wipe can vary depending upon the type of material being used to provide the wet wipe, the type of liquid being used, the type of container being used to store the stack of wet wipes, and the desired end use of the wet wipe. Generally, each wet wipe can contain from about 25 to about 700 weight percent or from about 200 to about 400 weight percent liquid based on the dry weight of the wipe, for improved wiping in certain situations. To determine the liquid add-on, first the weight of a just-manufactured dry wipe is determined. Then, the amount of liquid by weight equal to the weight of the just-manufactured dry wipe, or an increased amount of liquid measured as a percent add-on based on the weight of the just-manufactured dry wipe, is added to the wipe to make it moistened, and then known as a “wet wipe” or “wet wipes”. The liquid may include a fragrance and/or an emollient and may serve to aid the fibrous sheet in retention of materials, which are to be wiped up during its utilization.
As used herein, the term “nonwoven web” means a structure or a web of material that has been formed without use of traditional fabric forming processes, such as weaving or knitting, to produce a structure of individual fibers or threads that are intermeshed, but not in an identifiable, repeating manner. Non-woven webs have been, in the past, formed by a variety of conventional processes such as, for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes, film aperturing processes and staple fiber carding processes.
As used herein, the term “coform” means a nonwoven composite material of air-formed matrix material comprising thermoplastic polymeric meltblown fibers such as, for example, microfibers having an average fiber diameter of less than about 10 microns, and a multiplicity of individualized absorbent fibers such as, for example, wood pulp fibers disposed throughout the matrix of polymer microfibers and engaging at least some of the microfibers to space the microfibers apart from each other. The absorbent fibers are interconnected by and held captive within the matrix of microfibers by mechanical entanglement of the microfibers with the absorbent fibers, the mechanical entanglement and interconnection of the microfibers and absorbent fibers alone form a coherent integrated fibrous structure. The coherent integrated fibrous structure can be formed by the microfibers and wood pulp fibers without any adhesive, molecular or hydrogen bonds between the two different types of fibers. The absorbent fibers are preferably distributed uniformly throughout the matrix of microfibers to provide a homogeneous material. These materials are prepared according to the descriptions in U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,324 to Anderson et al. (“Anderson”), U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,102 to Georger et al. (“Georger”) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,775 to Wright (“Wright”), as well as related teaching in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/751,329, entitled “Composite Material With Cloth-Like Feel”, filed Dec. 29, 2000 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/032,703, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Controlling Retraction Of Composite Materials”, filed Dec. 28, 2001, all assigned to the same Assignee as in the present invention.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute part of this specification, are included to illustrate and provide a further understanding of the wipes of the invention.
The drawings are merely representative and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims. Like parts depicted in the drawings are referred to by the same reference numerals.
As representatively illustrated throughout the figures, and for explanation now referring to
As a result of their work, the inventors have determined that particular separably joined relationships to form a joint 11 between the plurality of wipes 12 are better than others for overcoming some challenges to successively dispensing wipes in a reach-in format one at a time more successfully, and with ease in finding the leading edge of each wipe for successive dispensing occasions. For example, the inventors have determined that the separably joined relationship (e.g., adhesive 22, weakened line 26, or others) can join together the at least two wipes 12 of the plurality of wipes such that, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, dispensing a top wipe from the stack of wipes causes an adjacent following wipe to at least partially be drawn upwards towards and/or through the dispensing opening 1303, and the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe at the joint 11 before the following wipe completely passes through the dispensing opening, and when the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe the following wipe falls back towards the stack of wipes and is positioned within the dispenser 1300 and below the dispensing opening 1303. As concerns the requirement that at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes perform as just discussed to completely separate automatically and fall back into the dispenser, the inventors have determined such is beneficial to achieve the desired reach-in dispensing more consistently and reliably throughout the stack of wipes, as compared to traditional pop-up dispensing systems which may fail (i.e., through wipe fall back) periodically but do not do so intentionally nor anywhere near at least 50% of the stack of wipes in such systems. Further in this regard, for the present invention, it can be more advantageous though not required, and in order of increasing advantage, for at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95%, of the wipes in the stack of wipes to perform as just discussed to completely separate automatically at the joint and fall back into the dispenser after each wipe dispensing occasion.
The type of fall back that can occur with wipes of the invention ranges anywhere from a nominal stretch and retraction and/or nominal position change of the leading portion of the following wipe (i.e., with very little separation of the leading portion 30 of the following wipe from the adjacent portion of the following wipe upon which the leading portion rested before dispensing of the top wipe) to position change of the entire following wipe (i.e., causing the following wipe to completely unfold and be substantially drawn though the dispensing opening but not separating from the next following wipe such that when the top wipe completely separates from the following wipe the following wipe can fall back towards the stack of wipes and be positioned within the dispenser and below the dispensing opening, and where the fallen back following wipe likely does not, though it may, return to its folded configuration and rather bunches up on top of the stack to await the next dispensing occasion).
For wipes of the invention to be completely separated automatically, this means that the mere act of dispensing the top wipe from the dispenser causes the following wipe to eventually separate from the top wipe without any further intervention from the user during dispensing of the top wipe. For example, this can be accomplished, at least in part, due to a weight of the following wipe creating a force greater than a joining force of the separably joined relationship between the top wipe and the following wipe during dispensing of the top wipe (i.e., the downward force created by the weight of the following wipe, either a portion of the following wipe or the entire wipe, is greater than the force holding the top wipe and the following wipe together at their separably joined interface). Further, this can also include adhesion (due to being wet wipes, the wipes formation process, the basesheet material forming the wipes, and the like) forces. In any event, it is desired that the separably joined relationship be made so the force holding the top wipe and the following wipe together at their separably joined interface, e.g., the joint 11, is no greater than the adhesion of the adjacent wipes opposing surface areas plus the weight of the following wipe, and advantageously, only the weight of the leading portion of the following wipe and not the entire following wipe. In this way, then, during dispensing of the top wipe the following wipe will completely separate automatically for the desired reach-in dispensing for wipes of the invention.
The particular separably joined relationship strength needed between wipes may vary from wipe to wipe, as well as be dependent upon such factors as: the composition of the wipe material, the solution moistening the wipe (if any), handling of the wipe during manufacturing, the type of separably joined relationship between adjacent wipes, the folded or unfolded configuration of the wipes, the relationship of one wipe to any adjacent wipes, combinations of these, and the like. In light of the now taught ability to create a stack of wipes 10 that, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack, intentionally fall back into the dispenser after each wipe is dispensed, one of ordinary skill in the art can determine the particular separably joined relationship strength needed for a particular stack of wipes.
For example, one such test to assist in determining the desired separably joined relationship, and strength of that relationship, is explained. This testing can be done, generally, under TAPPI standard procedures and conditions which would be applicable except as otherwise noted. A SINTECH™ Model # M4001 with a MTS 25 pound (11.4 Kg) load cell conventional test machine equipped with TestWorks™ 3.10 software for Windows, or comparable equipment, can be used. Testing is carried out according to ordinary procedures for using such equipment, and one can then determine the strength of the separably joined relationship between adjacent wipes (i.e., and the force to separate the wipes during dispensing as desired). Both the Sintech™ test machine and TestWorks™ software are available from MTS Corporation located at 1400 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, Minn., USA. With this knowledge, then one can adjust the separably joined relationship as desired by conventional means, e.g., without limitation, vary one or more of the factors such as: the composition of the wipe material, the solution moistening the wipe (if any), handling of the wipe during manufacturing, the type of separably joined relationship between adjacent wipes, the folded or unfolded configuration of the wipes, the relationship of one wipe to any adjacent wipes, and the like; in order to obtain a stack of wipes of the invention.
Table 1 sets out data obtained from sample wipes made in accordance with the teachings of the invention and some conventionally available comparative sample wipes. Sample A includes baby wet wipes (made of composite elastic coform) that are currently commercially available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation of Neenah, Wis. under the tradename HUGGIES® Supreme Care (moistened with 330% add-on of HUGGIES® Supreme Care solution). Sample B includes wet wipes made into a stack of wipes from the same material as the baby wipes product currently available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation of Neenah, Wis. under the tradename HUGGIES® Supreme Care (moistened with 330% add-on of HUGGIES® Supreme Care solution), but modified to obtain pleat-like leading and trailing edges according to the teaching in the separate, but concurrently filed, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/318,827, entitled “WIPES WITH A PLEAT-LIKE ZONE ALONG THE LEADING EDGE PORTION” of inventors Scott Lange et al.
The sample B wipes were folded generally like that seen in
The sample C wipes were identical to the sample B wipes, except the sample C wipes were folded like that seen in FIG. 6. The sample D wipes were made of the same material as currently commercially available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation of Neenah, Wis. under the tradename HUGGIES® Natural Care (moistened with 330% add-on of HUGGIES® Natural Care solution). The wipes did not have pleat-like leading and trailing edges but were folded like that seen in
The samples were then dispensed from a dispenser like that seen in
The inventors have developed other aspects that can be employed, as desired, to favorably impact the separably joined relationship between wipes 12. For example, adhesive 22 can be substantially located at the center leading edge of the wipes, and even, extending from about a first side 33 of the wipes to about a second side 33 of the wipes 12 if a weak enough adhesive pattern is used. As another example, adhesive 22 can be applied, at least in part, in a curved pattern. Yet further, for example, the adhesive can be applied, at least in part, in a swirl pattern. Still further, for example, a weakened line pattern can join the wipes 12 together over an entire length of the wipes when a weak enough pattern is used (e.g.,
The inventors have developed still another aspect that can be employed, as desired, to favorably impact the adhesive relationship between a plurality of wipes 12. For example, adhesive 22 can be added-on to the wipes 12 anywhere across the top surface portion of the wipe that will directly oppose the adjacent wipe laid on top for adhesive joining thereto (e.g., anywhere across the top surface portion seen in FIG. 1A). More particularly, the inventors have discovered that the add-on location across the top surface portion of the wipes can advantageously be located relative to the leading edge 31, in order of increasing advantage, within 75% of the leading edge, within 50% of the leading edge, within 25% of the leading edge, or within 10% of the leading edge. Still more particularly, the inventors have discovered that the add-on location across the top surface portion of the wipes can advantageously be located relative to the exact center of the wipes relative to the sides 33 of the wipe, in order of increasing advantage, within 50% of the exact center, within 25% of the exact center, or within 10% of the exact center.
The inventors have developed other aspects that can be employed, as desired, to favorably provide enhanced reach-in dispensing. For example, the trailing portion of the following wipe can be made to substantially stay undisplaced by dispensing of the top wipe. It can be further advantageous to provide the stack of wipes with separably joined relationships such that each top wipe only draws at most the leading portion (i.e., and mainly the hinge flap if there is one) towards the dispensing opening upon the top wipe completely separating automatically from the following wipe. With this later aspect, it is more likely that the leading edge will be in a stand-up position (discussed further below) and/or easy to distinguish from the rest of the following wipe because substantially only the leading portion will be loosened from the stack of wipes. One way to accomplish such a feature is to adjust the separably joined relationship as needed based on the teaching herein. Another example for enhancing reach-in dispensing of the invention is by providing the stack of wipes where, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipe, the leading portion 30 of the following wipe stays below the dispensing opening 1303 during the time when the top wipe is being dispensed and until the top wipe is completely separated automatically from the following wipe and the following wipe then becomes the top wipe in the stack of wipes. As still another example for enhanced dispensing, the leading portion 30 can have an edge portion 44 (
Referring to
The stack 10 of wipes 12 of the present invention, e.g., wet wipes, can be arranged in a package or dispenser in any manner which provides convenient and reliable one at a time dispensing in accordance with the invention, and advantageously, also which assists the wet wipes in not becoming contaminated (i.e., from an external environment) or overly dry (i.e., if wet wipes). For example, the wet wipes can be arranged in a dispenser or package as a plurality of individual sheets arranged in a stacked configuration to provide a stack of wet wipes which may or may not be individually folded. The wet wipes can be individual wet wipes which are folded in a c-fold configuration (e.g., FIG. 5), z-fold configuration (e.g., FIG. 4), backward z-fold configuration (e.g., FIG. 6), modified z-fold configuration (e.g., FIGS. 1-2), v-fold configuration (e.g.,
Referring to
Referring generally to the figures now, the plurality of wipes, such as a stack of wipes 12, can include any suitable number of individual wipes depending upon the desired packaging and end use. For example, the plurality 10 can be configured to include a stack of wet wipes which can include at least about 5 wet wipes and desirably from about 16 to about 320 individual wet wipes, and more desirably from about 32 to about 160 wet wipes. The size and shape of the stack of wipes 12 is dependent upon the size and shape of the package or dispenser and vice versa. For example, the length of an assembled stack of wipes can be about 190 mm, with a height of about 90 mm and a width of about 100 mm.
Each wipe is generally rectangular in shape and defines a pair of opposite side edges 33 and a pair of opposite end edges 31, 35 which can be referred to as a leading end edge 31 and a trailing end edge 35. Each wipe defines an unfolded width between sides 33 and an unfolded length between edges 31, 35. The wipe can have any suitable unfolded width and length. For example, a wet wipe can have an unfolded length of from about 2.0 to about 80.0 centimeters and desirably from about 10.0 to about 26.0 centimeters and an unfolded width of from about 2.0 to about 80.0 centimeters and desirably from about 10.0 to about 45.0 centimeters.
Materials suitable for the wipes of the present invention are well known to those skilled in the art. The wipes can be made from any material suitable for use as a wipe, including nonwoven webs, tissue materials, paper materials, high wet-strength tissue and the like and can comprise synthetic or natural fibers or combinations thereof. The wet wipes can have a dry basis weight of from about to about 120 grams per square meter and desirably from about 40 to about 90 grams per square meter.
In a particular aspect, the wet wipes can comprise coform, e.g., a coform basesheet of polymeric microfibers and cellulosic fibers having a basis weight of from about 60 to about 100 grams per square meter and desirably about 80-85 grams per square meter. Typically, such coform basesheets comprise a gas-formed matrix of thermoplastic polymeric meltblown microfibers, such as, for example, polypropylene microfibers, and cellulosic fibers, such as, for example, wood pulp fibers. The relative percentages of the polymeric microfibers and cellulosic fibers in the coform basesheet can vary over a wide range depending on the desired characteristics of the wet wipes. For example, the coform basesheet can comprise from about 20 to about 100 weight percent, desirably from about 20 to about 60 weight percent, and more desirably from about 30 to about 40 weight percent of polymeric microfibers based on the dry weight of the coform basesheet being used to provide the wet wipes. An example of such a coform basesheet for use in the present invention is found in the baby wipes product presently sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation and known as HUGGIES® Natural Care or found in the baby wipes product presently sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation and known as HUGGIES® Supreme Care.
In another aspect of the invention, wipes 12 can contain a liquid which can be any liquid or solution which can be absorbed into the wipes (e.g., water based, oil based, others), thus making them wet wipes. The wipes can be moistened at any time before the wipes are actually used by the consumer. Preferably they are moistened some time during the manufacturing process before or contemporaneous with the plurality of wipes being sealed in a dispenser or other packaging for next use by a product user. The liquid contained within the wet wipes can include any suitable components which provide the desired wiping properties. For example, the components can include water, emollients, surfactants, preservatives, chelating agents, pH buffers, fragrances or combinations thereof. The liquid can also contain lotions, ointments and/or medicaments. An example of such a liquid for use in the present invention is found in the baby wipes product presently sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation and known as HUGGIES® Natural Care.
The amount of liquid or solution contained within each wet wipe can vary depending upon the type of material being used to provide the wet wipe, the type of liquid or solution being used, the type of container being used to store the stack of wet wipes, and the desired end use of the wet wipe. In a particular aspect wherein the wet wipe is made from a coform material comprising from about 30 to about 40 weight percent polymeric microfibers based on the dry weight of the wipe, the amount of liquid contained within the wet wipe is from about 250 to about 350 weight percent and desirably about 330 weight percent based on the dry weight of the wet wipe. If the amount of liquid is less than the above-identified range, the wet wipes can be too dry and may not adequately perform depending on the desired task. If the amount of liquid is greater than the above-identified range, the wet wipes can be over saturated and soggy and the liquid can pool in the bottom of the container, as well as possibly contribute to problems with the adhesive 22 sticking to the surface of wipes 12.
Otherwise, steps 163 to 165 are analogous to above described steps 152, 153 and 154/157 respectively.
An example of non-rigid containers for use with the present invention is found in the baby wipes refill packages presently sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation and known as HUGGIES® Natural Care or HUGGIES® Supreme Care resealable refill packs. Generally, use of such non-rigid dispensers for dispensing wipes of the invention is similar to that for container 1300, except when due to obvious structural difference.
More particularly, for example, the invention is a method for dispensing a stack 10 of wipes 12 from a resealable reach-in wipes dispenser 1300 having a dispensing opening 1303. The method includes, in no particular order, though it can be advantageous to consider the following order, the following steps. First, a user unseals the reach-in wipes dispenser to gain access to a plurality of wipes 12 stacked upon each other to form the stack of wipes. Each wipe in the stack of wipes can be folded upon itself at least once and each wipe is separably joined to an adjacent wipe. Also, the wipes can be wet wipes. Next, the user locates a leading portion 30 of a top wipe and withdraws the leading portion through the dispensing opening 1303. Third, in this act of withdrawing the top wipe, the top wipe at least partially unfolds as the leading portion 30 is withdrawn through the dispensing opening. Then, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, the act of withdrawing the top wipe also draws upwards at least a portion of the following wipe towards and/or through the dispensing opening so that the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe before the following wipe completely passes through the dispensing opening and when the top wipe completely separates automatically from the following wipe the following wipe falls back towards the stack 10 of wipes 12 and is positioned within the dispenser 1300 and below the dispensing opening 1303. Fourth, the user seals the reach-in wipes dispenser, i.e., dosing the lid 1301 upon the base 1302. The method can also include, advantageously though not required, the following steps. During the dispensing of wipes 12 from the stack 10, for at least 50% of the wipes in the stack of wipes, maintaining the leading portion of the following wipe below the dispensing opening 1303 during the time when the top wipe is being dispensed and until the top wipe is completely separated automatically from the succeeding wipe. Additionally or alternatively, dispensing can include maintaining the trailing portion of the following wipe substantially undisplaced by dispensing of the top wipe. Still additionally or alternatively, dispensing can include positioning a portion of the leading portion 30 of the following wipe in a stand-up position for the time period immediately after complete dispensing of the top wipe and for at least one minute as long as the wipes remaining in the dispenser are substantially undisturbed by an outside force. Yet additionally or alternatively, though not specifically mentioned here again, other steps can be completed based on the teachings herein, as desired.
All publications, patents, and patent documents cited in the specification are incorporated by reference herein, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the case of any inconsistencies, the present disclosure, including any definitions herein, will prevail. While the invention has been described in detail with respect to the specific aspects thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to these aspects which fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention, which should be assessed accordingly to that of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2118380 | Gresenz | May 1938 | A |
2323395 | Harwood | Jul 1943 | A |
2502772 | Winstead | Apr 1950 | A |
2529853 | Taggart | Nov 1950 | A |
2626145 | Sabee | Jan 1953 | A |
2761677 | Rutkus et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2809082 | Marcuse | Oct 1957 | A |
2823089 | De Franco | Feb 1958 | A |
2890791 | Wenzel | Jun 1959 | A |
3007605 | Donovan | Nov 1961 | A |
3021002 | Guyer | Feb 1962 | A |
3160337 | Nelson | Dec 1964 | A |
3161336 | Loescher | Dec 1964 | A |
3172563 | Harwood | Mar 1965 | A |
3239097 | Bates et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3266666 | Nelson | Aug 1966 | A |
3369699 | Enloe et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3490645 | Glass et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3576243 | Trunick | Apr 1971 | A |
3679094 | Nissen et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3679095 | Nissen et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3700138 | Nelson | Oct 1972 | A |
3749296 | Harrison | Jul 1973 | A |
3780908 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3795355 | Gerstein | Mar 1974 | A |
3805474 | Gerstein | Apr 1974 | A |
3836044 | Tilp et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3843017 | Harrison | Oct 1974 | A |
3868052 | Rockefeller | Feb 1975 | A |
3881632 | Early et al. | May 1975 | A |
3894898 | Taylor | Jul 1975 | A |
3973695 | Ames | Aug 1976 | A |
4002264 | Marchesani | Jan 1977 | A |
4009682 | Patel et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4017002 | Doyle et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4064880 | Logan | Dec 1977 | A |
4100324 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4101026 | Bonk | Jul 1978 | A |
4166551 | Stiros | Sep 1979 | A |
4191609 | Trokhan | Mar 1980 | A |
4200200 | Hein, III et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4219129 | Sedgwick | Aug 1980 | A |
4244493 | Harrison | Jan 1981 | A |
4262816 | Margulies | Apr 1981 | A |
4328655 | Spencer et al. | May 1982 | A |
4328907 | Beard | May 1982 | A |
4416392 | Smith | Nov 1983 | A |
4450026 | Pieniak et al. | May 1984 | A |
4458810 | Mahoney | Jul 1984 | A |
4475881 | Borst et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4534491 | Norton et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4574952 | Masui | Mar 1986 | A |
4611728 | Compton et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623074 | Dearwester | Nov 1986 | A |
4638921 | Sigl et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653666 | Mertens | Mar 1987 | A |
4674634 | Wilson | Jun 1987 | A |
4681240 | Wyant | Jul 1987 | A |
4720415 | Vander Wielen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4741944 | Jackson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4768810 | Mertens | Sep 1988 | A |
4776649 | ten Wolde | Oct 1988 | A |
4778048 | Kaspar et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4781306 | Smith | Nov 1988 | A |
4859518 | Schutz | Aug 1989 | A |
4863064 | Dailey, III | Sep 1989 | A |
4865221 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4895746 | Mertens | Jan 1990 | A |
4921127 | Windorski | May 1990 | A |
4927064 | Burgin | May 1990 | A |
4952432 | Ten Wolde | Aug 1990 | A |
4986440 | Windorski | Jan 1991 | A |
4993590 | Windorski | Feb 1991 | A |
5033620 | De Luca | Jul 1991 | A |
5050909 | Mertens et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5067628 | Evenson | Nov 1991 | A |
5076424 | Nakamura | Dec 1991 | A |
5080254 | Feer | Jan 1992 | A |
5080255 | Windorski | Jan 1992 | A |
5118554 | Chan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5152121 | Nakamura | Oct 1992 | A |
5158205 | Bodziak et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165570 | Windorski et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167346 | Bodziak | Dec 1992 | A |
5316177 | Boldt | May 1994 | A |
5332118 | Muckenfuhs | Jul 1994 | A |
5350597 | Pelley | Sep 1994 | A |
5358140 | Pellegrino | Oct 1994 | A |
5379897 | Muckenfuhs et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385775 | Wright | Jan 1995 | A |
5508102 | Georger et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516001 | Muckenfuhs et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520308 | Berg, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5540332 | Kopacz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5642835 | Young et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647506 | Julius | Jul 1997 | A |
5810200 | Trokhan | Sep 1998 | A |
5891008 | Bavely et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899447 | Muckenfuhs | May 1999 | A |
6082663 | Tramontina et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
20020127937 | Lange et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020192433 | Huang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195764 | Sosalla | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030022781 | Sosalla et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
996515 | Sep 1976 | CA |
0 223 262 | May 1987 | EP |
0 286 538 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 857 453 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1 023 863 | Aug 2000 | EP |
WO 0044270 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 02053365 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02053368 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040115393 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |