The present invention generally relates to medical implants and uses thereof for treating obesity and/or obesity-related diseases and, more specifically, to transorally-delivered devices designed to occupy space within a stomach and/or stimulate the stomach wall and react to changing conditions within the stomach.
Over the last 50 years, obesity has been increasing at an alarming rate and is now recognized by leading government health authorities, such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), as a disease. In the United States alone, obesity affects more than 60 million individuals and is considered the second leading cause of preventable death. Worldwide, approximately 1.6 billion adults are overweight, and it is estimated that obesity affects at least 400 million adults.
Obesity is caused by a wide range of factors including genetics, metabolic disorders, physical and psychological issues, lifestyle, and poor nutrition. Millions of obese and overweight individuals first turn to diet, fitness and medication to lose weight; however, these efforts alone are often not enough to keep weight at a level that is optimal for good health. Surgery is another increasingly viable alternative for those with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of greater than 40. In fact, the number of bariatric surgeries in the United States was estimated to be about 400,000 in 2010.
Examples of surgical methods and devices used to treat obesity include the LAP-BAND® (Allergan Medical of Irvine, Calif.) gastric band and the LAP-BAND AP® (Allergan). However, surgery might not be an option for every obese individual; for certain patients, non-surgical therapies or minimal-surgery options are more effective or appropriate.
In the early 1980s, physicians began to experiment with the placement of intragastric balloons to reduce the size of the stomach reservoir, and consequently its capacity for food. Once deployed in the stomach, the balloon helps to trigger a sensation of fullness and a decreased feeling of hunger. These devices are designed to provide therapy for moderately obese individuals who need to shed pounds in preparation for surgery, or as part of a dietary or behavioral modification program. These balloons are typically cylindrical or pear-shaped, generally range in size from 200-500 ml or more, are made of an elastomer such as silicone, polyurethane, or latex, and are filled with air, an inert gas, water, or saline.
One such inflatable intragastric balloon is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,061 and is commercially available as the BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon System (“BIB System,” sold under the trademark ORBERA). The BIB System comprises a silicone elastomer intragastric balloon that is inserted into the stomach and filled with fluid. Conventionally, the balloons are placed in the stomach in an empty or deflated state and thereafter filled (fully or partially) with a suitable fluid. The balloon occupies space in the stomach, thereby leaving less room available for food and creating a feeling of satiety for the patient. Placement of the intragastric balloon is non-surgical, trans-oral, usually requiring no more than 20-30 minutes. The procedure is performed gastroscopically in an outpatient setting, typically using local anesthesia and sedation. Placement of such balloons is temporary, and such balloons are typically removed after about six months. Removing the balloon requires deflation by puncturing with a gastroscopic instrument, and either aspirating the contents of the balloon and removing it, or allowing the fluid to pass into the patient's stomach. Clinical results with these devices show that for many obese patients, the intragastric balloons significantly help to control appetite and accomplish weight loss.
Some attempted solutions for weight loss by placing devices in the stomach result in unintended consequences. For instance, some devices tend to cause food and liquid to back up in the stomach, leading to symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition in which the stomach contents (food or liquid) leak backwards from the stomach into the esophagus. Also, the stomach acclimates to some gastric implant devices, leading to an expansion of stomach volume and consequent reduction in the efficacy of the device.
Therefore, despite many advances in the design of intragastric obesity treatment implants, there remains a need for improved devices that can be implanted for longer periods than before or otherwise address certain drawbacks of intragastric balloons and other such implants.
Transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices generally promote a feeling of satiety in the patient by contacting the insides of the stomach wall. In addition, transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices generally allow for easy and quick placement and removal. Surgery is usually not required or very minimal. In one embodiment, the transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices may be placed in the patient's stomach through the mouth, passing the esophagus and reaching the destination. The transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices do not require suturing or stapling to the esophageal or stomach wall, and remains inside the patient's body for a lengthy period of time (e.g., months or years) before removal.
Each of the disclosed devices is formed of materials that will resist degradation over a period of at least six months within the stomach. The implantable devices are configured to be compressed into a substantially linear transoral delivery configuration and placed in a patient's stomach transorally without surgery to treat and prevent obesity by applying a pressure to the patient's stomach.
In one embodiment, a transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring device may fight obesity or reduce weight by stimulating the stomach walls of the patient. The three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring device may be a purely mechanical device comprising a flexible body which in response to an input force in one direction, may deform and cause a resultant displacement in an orthogonal direction, thereby exerting a pressure on the inner stomach walls of the patient.
In another embodiment, a transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring device may include a variable size balloon. The balloon may be configured to occupy volume in the patient's stomach, thereby reducing the amount of space in the patient's stomach.
In a particular embodiment disclosed herein, a reactive implantable device comprises a three-dimensional spring structure comprising a plurality of legs each having opposite ends extended between top and bottom junctions of the spring structure defining an axis. Each leg has a flexible portion and a rigid portion attached to the flexible portion, wherein the flexible portions of each leg has a relaxed shape which causes the leg to bow laterally outward from the other legs thus maintaining the top and bottom junctions at a first distance apart. The implantable device is configured to react to inward forces from the stomach such that the flexible portions flex to straighten each leg and cause the axial spacing between the top and bottom junctions to increase from the first distance. The implantable device may have four or more legs, and the rigid portion comprises four or more distinct rigid members per leg. Each of the top and bottom junctions preferably comprises a quadrilateral-shaped cap, wherein the opposite ends of each leg are attached to different edges of the respective quadrilateral-shaped caps.
In one embodiment, a balloon is integrated with the three-dimensional spring structure and filled with fluid. The balloon may be within or outside the legs of the three-dimensional spring structure. If outside, the device may further include a pump located within the balloon and integrated with the three-dimensional spring structure configured to inflate and deflate the elastic balloon by transferring stomach liquid into and out of the elastic balloon.
Another reactive implantable device disclosed herein comprises a central elongated body having an adjustable length. Two collapsible atraumatic feet on opposite ends of the elongated body are configured to exert pressure on the patient's stomach when in a deployed position. A spring within the central elongated body biases the length of the body away from a minimum length. The two collapsible atraumatic feet may comprise balloon-like structures. The two collapsible atraumatic feet may alternatively comprise an array of living hinges that may be unfolded to an elongated delivery configuration and folded outward to a deployed configuration. In one embodiment, the array of living hinges is in an X-shape. The central elongated body preferably comprises a series of telescoping tubular members having apertures along their lengths.
A still further reactive implantable device includes an inflatable body having an internal volumetric capacity of between 400-700 ml and being made of a material that permits it to be compressed into a substantially linear transoral delivery configuration and that will resist degradation over a period of at least six months within the stomach. The body has a plurality of popout features on its surface that reside generally flush with the inflatable body in relaxed, retracted states, and which respond to an increase in pressure within the inflatable body by projecting outward from the body in a stressed, deployed state. The inflatable body may have a generally barrel shape along an axis. The popout features may be generally cylindrical, or are rounded bars oriented parallel to the axis. The popout features preferably convert between their retracted and deployed states by movement of rolling diaphragms formed in the inflatable body.
A still further reactive implantable device disclosed herein has an inflatable body with an internal volumetric capacity of between 400-700 ml and being made of a material that permits it to be compressed into a substantially linear transoral delivery configuration and that will resist degradation over a period of at least six months within the stomach. The body has a central inflatable member and at least two outer wings, and a single internal fluid chamber such that fluid may flow between the central inflatable member and the outer wings. The inflatable body is underfilled with fluid such that the outer wings are floppy in the absence of compressive stress on the central inflatable member and stiff when compressive stress from the stomach acts on the central inflatable member. The central inflatable member may have a generally spherical shape along an axis. There are preferably two outer wings extending in opposite directions from the generally spherical inflatable member along the axis. In one form, each of the outer wings includes a narrow shaft portion connected to the central inflatable member terminating in bulbous heads.
The invention also comprises a reactive implantable device configured for transoral placement into a patient's stomach for the treatment of obesity by applying a pressure to the patient's stomach, the implantable device comprising: a spring or spring type structure having a plurality of legs each leg having opposite ends extended between top and bottom junctions of the spring thereby defining an axis, each leg also having a flexible portion and a rigid portion attached to the flexible portion, wherein the flexible portions of each leg has a relaxed shape which causes the leg to bow laterally outward from the other legs to thereby maintain the top and bottom junctions at a first distance apart, and wherein the implantable device is configured to react to inward forces from the stomach such that the flexible portions flex to straighten each leg and cause the axial spacing between the top and bottom junctions to increase from the first distance, wherein the device is formed of materials that permit it to be compressed into a substantially linear transoral delivery configuration and that will resist substantially resist degradation over a period of at least six months within the stomach. To substantially resist degradation means that when placed in the acid environment of the stomach the device still functions at least substantially as intended, that is a clinically significant result (i.e. weight loss or the maintenance of a weight loss) can still be obtained.
The following detailed descriptions are given by way of example, but not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure solely to the specific embodiments described herein, may best be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Persons skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various aspects of the disclosure may be realized by any number of methods and devices configured to perform the intended functions. Stated differently, other methods and devices may be incorporated herein to perform the intended functions. It should also be noted that the drawing FIGS. referred to herein are not all drawn to scale, but may be exaggerated to illustrate various aspects of the invention, and in that regard, the drawing FIGS. should not be construed as limiting. Finally, although the present disclosure may be described in connection with various medical principles and beliefs, the present disclosure should not be bound by theory.
By way of example, the present disclosure will reference certain transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring device. Nevertheless, persons skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the present disclosure advantageously may be applied to one of the numerous varieties of three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices.
In one embodiment, these three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring device described herein are intended to be placed inside the patient, transorally and without invasive surgery, without associated patient risks of invasive surgery and without substantial patient discomfort. Recovery time may be minimal as no extensive tissue healing is required. The life span of these transoral three-dimensionally orthogonal intragastric spring devices may be material-dependent upon long-term survivability within an acidic stomach, but is intended to last one year or longer.
The legs 125 are attached and held together by the top and bottom junctions 115 and 120, respectively. The junctions 115, 120 desirably comprise top and bottom caps. As shown, the caps forming the junctions 115 and 120 are quadrilateral in configuration and each leg 125 attaches to a different one of the four sides of the caps 115 and 120. As shown, the spring device 100 is in a natural state and fully functional. That is, the shape shown in
In one embodiment, the materials used to construct the spring device 100 may include metals, thermoplastics, thermoplastic elastomers, silicones, glass, thermosets or any combination thereof. More particularly, the rigid portions 105 may be made of a more rigid material such as a silver alloy or glass, while the flexible portions 110 may be constructed out of elastomeric materials. If silver is used, the rigid portions 105 provide an antiseptic benefit to the device 100 to prevent bacteria from growing. The junction caps 115 and 120 may also be constructed out of rigid materials. In one embodiment, the flexible portions 110 may be constructed out of one material, while the rigid portions 120 and the junction caps, 115 and 120, are constructed out of a second material.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Next, a method of manufacturing of a spring device (e.g., spring device 100 or 200) will be discussed. While the following description refers to spring device 100 specifically, the same principles apply to spring device 200 or any other embodiment of the spring device equally.
After formation, and well before or just prior to use, the spring device 100 may be placed inside a removable sleeve, band, or otherwise held in a “deformed” or straightened position (e.g., as shown in
For removal, a standard grabber may encircle the spring device 100 at the flexible portions 110 and decompress the spring device into a straightened state for easy removal. In one embodiment, the flexible portions 110 configured to be “grabbed” by the standard grabber to decompress the spring device 100 may be injected with a radio opaque additive during the construction of these portions so that the physician may identify and view these portions when viewing an x-ray during the removal procedure.
Turning to
In another embodiment, as shown by
Similarly, as shown by
As described above with respect to
In different embodiments, the spring device (e.g., spring device 100 or 200) may further include an intragastric balloon.
In one embodiment, the transoral device 504 may be considered a two-phase intragastric device. In the first phase, the intragastric balloon 500 expands to a sufficient volume that effectively negates the impact of the spring device 100. That is, the intragastric balloon 500 may be so large that the legs of spring device 100 never contact the inside of the stomach walls. In this phase, the spring device 100 is a purely volume occupying device. In a second phase, the volume of the intragastric balloon 500 is reduced (deflated) such that the legs of the spring device 100 protrude against the “walls” or balloon layer 505 of the intragastric balloon 500, thereby receiving input pressures from the stomach walls during contraction, and causing the spring device 100 to react as described above with respect to
The inflatable balloon device 504 may be inflated and filled with stomach juices naturally occurring and produced in the patient's body. At the outer surface of the top 510 of the central tubular body 520 is an opening 515 that functions as an intake for a peristaltic pump 525 integrated into the body 520. The pump 525 pulls stomach juices into the inflatable layer 505 to fill and expand the balloon 500, or pushes out stomach juices from inside the inflatable layer 505 to deflate the balloon 500. Though not shown in great detail, the peristaltic pump 525 includes two openings, the inlet opening 515 at the top of the body 520 and an outlet opening (not shown) leading to the space within the inflatable layer 505. Peristaltic rollers 535 of the pump 525 are in fluid connection with flexible tubes that connect to the inlet and outlet openings. In operation, the rollers 535 rotate in one direction to move stomach fluid from one tube to the other tube and out of outlet opening 515, thereby deflating the inflatable balloon device 504. Opposite rotation of the rollers 535 pulls stomach fluid in the inlet opening 515 and expels it to the cavity of the inflatable layer 505, thus inflating the balloon device 504. The inflatable balloon device 504 may further include a control portion or control board 530 and motor (not shown). By inflating the inflatable balloon device 504 to a volume between about 0 milliliters (mL) and about 1000 mL (but preferably between about 400 mL and about 700 mL), the balloon device 504 occupies space in the stomach decreasing the amount of space for food, and also stimulates the stomach walls when the inflatable balloon device 504 (via inflation and/or migration) exerts a pressure on the inner stomach walls.
The rollers 535 may be controlled according to any of a number of methods. Initially, when the inflatable balloon device 504 is first deployed in the patient's stomach, the control board 530 may read a schedule (stored in memory) providing instructions related to the different volumes that inflatable balloon device 504 may adjust to, and at which times. In one example, the schedule may be a daily schedule that the inflatable balloon device 504 follows. Alternatively, the schedule may be for a week, month, year and so forth. After the schedule is read, the target volume may be determined, and the motor may be driven to achieve the target volume. Subsequently, the inflatable balloon device 504 may determine if a trigger to change the volume is detected. For example, the trigger may be merely determining that the schedule dictates a changing of the volume of the inflatable balloon device 504. Other triggers may include a command from an external computer to change the volume of the inflatable balloon device 504.
A portion of the central body 520 of the inflatable balloon device 504 is desirably covered by an antiseptic band 560. The band 560 may be a separate piece of metal attached to the body 520, or may be directly integrated into the body 520 as an exterior layer. The band 560 may be constructed of any material with cleansing, antiseptic qualities. In one example, silver may be used to form the band since silver has natural antiseptic qualities. The function of the band 560 is to passively disinfect the stomach fluid inside the inflatable layer 505.
The insertion process for the inflatable balloon device 504 may be as simple as having the patient swallow the device while in a deflated state. Alternatively, the inflatable balloon device 504 in a deflated state may be carefully inserted through the mouth of the patient, down the esophagus and into the patient's stomach by using a standard grabber.
The removal process for the inflatable balloon device 504 may be substantially the reverse of the insertion process. After substantially deflating the inflatable balloon device 504, a standard grabber may be used to clamp onto one end of the device and pulled back up through the esophagus and out the patient's mouth.
The intragastric implant 600 is configured to telescope to varying lengths. For example,
Here, no electronics are required. The benefit to this embodiment is that no motor is required (and hence, the production of the implant 600 may be cheaper). However, the trade-off is that the patient's body may have a higher likelihood of compensating to a spring-biased implant 600 since the telescoping depends on the position of the implant and cannot change randomly or according to a diverse schedule. Nevertheless, the action of the reactive intragastric implant 600 is believed to be sufficiently variable to prevent accommodation by the stomach.
The feet 620 may be bent to a straightened or elongated position to allow easier implantation and removal. In embodiment, the entire intragastric implant including the feet 620 (in a straightened state, not shown) may be no larger than 10 millimeters (mm) in diameter, thereby easily passing transorally into the patient's mouth, through the esophagus and into the patient's stomach. However, once implanted inside the patient's stomach, the feet fold to the deployed state as shown in
The feet 620 are configured to be atraumatic, in that they are soft and pliable. The feet 620 are desirably formed as an array of fingers of a soft polymer, each preferably having thinned regions so as to function like living hinges. More particularly, each of the spokes of the “X” shaped feet 620 has a rectangular cross-section to facilitate bending in one plane, and thinned regions at three points: where it connects to the respective extension portion 650, where it connects to the other spokes along an axis of the device, and at a mid-portion which forms the outermost end of each of the spokes in the deployed configuration seen in
Furthermore, the tubular body 605 and extension portions 650 are desirably hollow and include through holes 695 to allow stomach juices to flow through. The tubular body 605 and extension portions 650 may be constructed, for example, out of a polysulphone, polypropylene or an acid-resistant plastic material configured to resist the strong acidity of the stomach juices.
The intragastric implants 700, 720 described above are primarily volume occupying, similar to current gastric balloons. As such, the fill volume is desirably the same, preferably between 400-700 mL. However, because of the popout surface features, the implants also provide enhanced stimulation to the surrounding stomach walls, which induces satiety. Furthermore, a number of rotationally variant intragastric implants are shown below with reference to
The two embodiments of intragastric implants 700, 720 with popout features 704, 722 shown in
Finally, a “rolling diaphragm” refers to a region surrounding each of the popout features that permits a projection to remain retracted until an inner chamber of the implant is pressurized, at which time it extrudes out from the surrounding wall surfaces. The illustrated embodiment of rolling diaphragm shows a continuous transition of the diaphragm which “roles” at a crease. Another way to define rolling diaphragm is a surface feature that allows for a change in the outer surface shape without any change in surface area. These intragastric implants experience bending stresses to change shape, rather than experiencing tensile stretching, which improve the durability of the devices. The same function can be obtained with structure that is more hinged as opposed to rolling, such that there is a sudden transition between a retracted position to a projecting position. Additionally, other popout configurations include a folded or spiral shape that unfolds when pressurized, elements that lie flat against the wall of the implant until pressurized, thinned regions of the wall which bow outward from surrounding figure wall portions, etc. It should be understood that the term “popout features” encompasses all of these variations.
Initially, the entire implant 740 is underfilled with a fluid such as saline or air to a degree that the wings 744 are floppy, and a predetermined compressive force causes them to become stiff. For example, the fully filled volume of the intragastric implant 740 may be between 400-700 mL, though the implant is filled with less than that, thus providing slack for flow into the wings 744. Additionally, it should be noted that underfilling the implant 740 results in lower stresses within the shell wall, which may improve the degradation properties of the material within the stomach's harsh environment.
The devices 890, 900 of
Another option for a number of the intragastric devices disclosed herein is to add exterior stimulation features, such as any raised or depressed geometry which act to stimulate certain portions of the stomach walls. Such features may be particularly effective for those embodiments which stimulate the cardia. For instance,
It should also be stated that any of the embodiments described herein may utilize materials that improve the efficacy of the implant. For example, a number of elastomeric materials may be used including, but not limited to, rubbers, fluorosilicones, fluoroelastomers, thermoplastic elastomers, or any combinations thereof. The materials are desirably selected so as to increase the durability of the implant and facilitate implantation of at least six months, and preferably more than 1 year.
Material selection may also improve the safety of the implant. Some of the materials suggested herein, for example, may allow for a thinner wall thickness and have a lower coefficient of friction than the implant.
The implantable devices described herein will be subjected to clinical testing in humans. The devices are intended to treat obesity, which is variously defined by different medical authorities. In general, the terms “overweight” and “obese” are labels for ranges of weight that are greater than what is generally considered healthy for a given height. The terms also identify ranges of weight that have been shown to increase the likelihood of certain diseases and other health problems. Applicants propose implanting the devices as described herein into a clinical survey group of obese patients in order to monitor weight loss.
The clinical studies will utilize the devices described above in conjunction with the following parameters.
Materials:
Purposes:
General Implant Procedures:
One exemplary implant procedure is listed below.
End Point Criteria:
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the disclosure are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
The terms “a,” “an,” “the” and similar referents used in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.
Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member may be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. It is anticipated that one or more members of a group may be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.
Certain embodiments are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Of course, variations on these described embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventor expects skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Furthermore, references may have been made to patents and printed publications in this specification. Each of the above-cited references and printed publications are individually incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Specific embodiments disclosed herein may be further limited in the claims using “consisting of” or “consisting essentially of” language. When used in the claims, whether as filed or added per amendment, the transition term “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claims. The transition term “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s). Embodiments of the invention so claimed are inherently or expressly described and enabled herein.
In closing, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Other modifications that may be employed are within the scope of the invention. Thus, by way of example, but not of limitation, alternative configurations of the present invention may be utilized in accordance with the teachings herein. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to that precisely as shown and described.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/394,708, filed Oct. 19, 2010, to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/394,592, filed Oct. 19, 2010, and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/394,145, filed Oct. 18, 2010, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1702974 | MacDonald | Feb 1929 | A |
2087604 | Mosher | Jul 1937 | A |
2163048 | McKee | Jun 1939 | A |
2619138 | Marler | Nov 1952 | A |
3667081 | Burger | Jun 1972 | A |
3719973 | Bell | Mar 1973 | A |
3840018 | Heifetz | Oct 1974 | A |
3919724 | Sanders | Nov 1975 | A |
4118805 | Reimels | Oct 1978 | A |
4364379 | Finney | Dec 1982 | A |
4416267 | Garren et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4430392 | Kelley | Feb 1984 | A |
4485805 | Foster | Dec 1984 | A |
4545367 | Tucci | Oct 1985 | A |
4586501 | Claracq | May 1986 | A |
4592355 | Antebi | Jun 1986 | A |
4598699 | Garren | Jul 1986 | A |
4607618 | Angelchik | Aug 1986 | A |
4636213 | Pakiam | Jan 1987 | A |
4648383 | Angelchik | Mar 1987 | A |
4694827 | Weiner | Sep 1987 | A |
4723547 | Kullas | Feb 1988 | A |
4739758 | Lai et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4773432 | Rydell | Sep 1988 | A |
4774956 | Kruse et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4844068 | Arata et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4881939 | Newman | Nov 1989 | A |
4899747 | Garren et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4925446 | Garay et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930535 | Rinehold | Jun 1990 | A |
4950258 | Kawai | Aug 1990 | A |
4969899 | Cox | Nov 1990 | A |
5074868 | Kuzmak | Dec 1991 | A |
5084061 | Gau | Jan 1992 | A |
5211371 | Coffee | May 1993 | A |
5226429 | Kuzmak | Jul 1993 | A |
5255690 | Keith | Oct 1993 | A |
5259399 | Brown | Nov 1993 | A |
5289817 | Williams | Mar 1994 | A |
5308324 | Hammerslag | May 1994 | A |
5312343 | Krog et al. | May 1994 | A |
5449368 | Kuzmak | Sep 1995 | A |
5514176 | Bosley | May 1996 | A |
5527340 | Vogel | Jun 1996 | A |
5540701 | Sharkey | Jul 1996 | A |
5547458 | Ortiz | Aug 1996 | A |
5601604 | Vincent | Feb 1997 | A |
5658298 | Vincent | Aug 1997 | A |
5693014 | Abele | Dec 1997 | A |
5725507 | Petrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5748200 | Funahashi | May 1998 | A |
5776160 | Pasricha | Jul 1998 | A |
5819749 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
5820584 | Crabb | Oct 1998 | A |
RE36176 | Kuzmak | Mar 1999 | E |
5938669 | Klaiber | Aug 1999 | A |
6074341 | Anderson | Jun 2000 | A |
6102678 | Peclat | Aug 2000 | A |
6102897 | Lang | Aug 2000 | A |
6102922 | Jakobsson | Aug 2000 | A |
6152922 | Ouchi | Nov 2000 | A |
6183492 | Hart | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6264700 | Kilcoyne et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290575 | Shipp | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6322538 | Elbert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6450946 | Forsell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454699 | Forsell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454785 | De Hoyos Garza | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464628 | Forsell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470892 | Forsell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503264 | Birk | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511490 | Robert | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6540789 | Silverman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547801 | Dargent | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579301 | Bales et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629776 | Bell | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6675809 | Stack et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682473 | Matsuura | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6733512 | McGhan | May 2004 | B2 |
6733513 | Boyle | May 2004 | B2 |
6746460 | Gannoe | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776783 | Frantzen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6840257 | Dario | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845776 | Stack et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6905471 | Leivseth | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6960233 | Berg | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981978 | Gannoe | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981980 | Sampson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994095 | Burnett | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008419 | Shadduck | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020531 | Colliou | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7033384 | Gannoe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037344 | Kagan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056305 | Garza Alvarez | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090699 | Geitz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7214233 | Gannoe et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220237 | Gannoe et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220284 | Kagan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223277 | DeLegge | May 2007 | B2 |
7320696 | Gazi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7347875 | Levine et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354454 | Stack et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7476256 | Meade et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7510559 | Deem et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7608114 | Levine et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628442 | Spencer | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7682330 | Meade et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695446 | Levine et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699863 | Marco et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7753870 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771382 | Levine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794447 | Dann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815589 | Meade et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837643 | Levine et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841503 | Sonnenschein et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7883525 | DeLegge | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7931693 | Binmoeller | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7981162 | Stack et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8029455 | Stack et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8032223 | Imran | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8075582 | Lointier | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8162969 | Brister | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187297 | Makower | May 2012 | B2 |
8216266 | Hively | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020019577 | Arabia | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020055757 | Torre | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095181 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020139208 | Yatskov | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183782 | Tsugita | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045896 | Murphy | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073880 | Polsky | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074054 | Duerig | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100822 | Lew | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106761 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109935 | Geitz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144575 | Forsell | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153905 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158570 | Ferrazzi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040044357 | Gannoe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040092892 | Kagan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117031 | Stack et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122452 | Deem et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122453 | Deem et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143342 | Stack | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148034 | Kagan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172142 | Stack | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186503 | DeLegge | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050033332 | Burnett | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049718 | Dann et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055039 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085923 | Levine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096692 | Linder et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110280 | Guy | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131485 | Knudson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050190070 | Rudduck | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192614 | Binmoeller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192615 | Torre | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197714 | Sayet | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228504 | Demarais | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240279 | Kagan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250979 | Coe | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256533 | Roth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261711 | Okada | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267595 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267596 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273060 | Levy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277975 | Saadat | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020278 | Burnett | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025799 | Basu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069403 | Shalon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106288 | Roth | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142700 | Sobelman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178691 | Binmoeller | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190019 | Gannoe | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217762 | Maahs | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229702 | Agnew | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252983 | Lembo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070010864 | Dann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016262 | Gross et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021761 | Phillips | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078476 | Hull, Sr. et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083224 | Hively | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100368 | Quijano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118168 | Lointier et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135829 | Paganon | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147170 | Hood | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149994 | Sosnowski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156013 | Birk | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156248 | Marco | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173881 | Birk et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185374 | Kick | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239284 | Skerven et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250020 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265598 | Karasik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276428 | Haller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288033 | Murature | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293716 | Baker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015618 | Sonnenschein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058840 | Albrecht et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058887 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065122 | Stack et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071305 | DeLegge | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097513 | Kaji et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080167606 | Dann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172079 | Birk | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208240 | Paz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208241 | Weiner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221595 | Surti | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228205 | Sharkey | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234718 | Paganon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234834 | Meade et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243071 | Quijano | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243166 | Paganon et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249635 | Weitzner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255601 | Birk | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255678 | Cully et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262529 | Jacques | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306506 | Leatherman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012553 | Swain et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082644 | Li | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093767 | Kelleher | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093837 | Dillon | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131968 | Birk | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132031 | Cook | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149879 | Dillon | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177215 | Stack | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198210 | Burnett et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216337 | Egan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259246 | Eskaros et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275973 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287231 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299327 | Tilson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299486 | Shohat et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312597 | Bar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030017 | Baker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049224 | Vargas | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100081991 | Swisher | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082047 | Cosgrove | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087843 | Bertolote | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100079 | Berkcan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100115 | Soetermans et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121371 | Brooks et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168782 | Hancock | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168783 | Murature | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174307 | Birk | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198249 | Sabliere | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234937 | Wang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249822 | Nihalani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249825 | Nihalani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256775 | Belhe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100256776 | Levine et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261390 | Gardner | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274194 | Sobelman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286628 | Gross | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305590 | Holmes et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331756 | Meade et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332000 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009897 | Forsell | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106113 | Tavakkolizadeh | May 2011 | A1 |
20110307075 | Sharma | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120022561 | Forsell | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120095483 | Babkes | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120221037 | Birk | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1250382 | Apr 2000 | CN |
1367670 | Sep 2002 | CN |
8804765 | May 1989 | DE |
102007025312 | Nov 2008 | DE |
1396242 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1396243 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1397998 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1774929 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2095798 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2797181 | Feb 2001 | FR |
2823663 | Oct 2002 | FR |
2852821 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2892297 | Apr 2007 | FR |
2941617 | Aug 2010 | FR |
2855744 | Dec 2004 | GB |
2086792 | May 1982 | JP |
S63279854 | Nov 1988 | JP |
1049572 | Feb 1989 | JP |
63264078 | Oct 1998 | JP |
8800027 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 8800027 | Jan 1988 | WO |
0015158 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0032092 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0110359 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0149245 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0166166 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0235980 | May 2002 | WO |
03055419 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03105732 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004019671 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2005007231 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005094257 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005097012 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005097012 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005110280 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110280 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006044640 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006020370 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006063593 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006090018 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006111961 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006118744 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007027812 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007053556 | May 2007 | WO |
2007076021 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007092390 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007110866 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008101048 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008112894 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008132745 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2010042062 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010074712 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010074712 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010087757 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010117641 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Xanthakos et al.; ‘Bariatric Surgery for Extreme Adolescent Obesity: Indications, Outcomes, and Physiologic Effects on the Gut-Brain Axis’; Pathophysiology; V. 15; pp. 135-146; 2008. |
Baggio et al. ‘Biology of Integrins: GLP-1 and GIP’; Gastroenrology; V. 132; pp. 2131-2157; 2007. |
Berne et al; ‘Physiology’; V. 5; pp. 55-57, 210, 428, 540, 554, 579, 584, 591; 2004. |
Boulant et al.; ‘Cholecystokinin in Transient Lower Oesophageal Sphincter Relation Due to Gastric Distension in Humans’; Gut; V. 40; pp. 575-581; 1997. |
Bradjewin et al; ‘Dose Ranging Study of the Effects of Cholecystokinin in Healthy Volunteers’; J. Psychiatr. Neurosci.; V. 16 (2); pp. 91-95; 1991. |
Chaudhri; ‘Can Gut Hormones Control Appetite and Prevent Obesity?’ Diabetes Care; V. 31; Supp 2; pp. S284-S289; Feb. 2008. |
Cohen et al.; ‘Oxyntomodulin Suppresses Appetite and Reduces Food in Humans’; J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; V. 88; pp. 4696-4701; 2003. |
Dakin et al.; ‘Oxyntomodulin Inhibits Food Intake in the Rat’; Endocrinology; V. 142; pp. 4244-4250; 2001. |
Dakin et al.; ‘Peripheral Oxyntomodulin Reduces Food Intake and Body Weight gain in Rats’; Endocrinology; V. 145; No. 6; pp. 2687-2695; Jun. 2004. |
Davison; ‘Activation of Vagal-Gastric Mechanoreceptors by Cholecystokinin’; Proc. West. Pharmocol. Soc; V. 29; pp. 363-366; 1986. |
Ekblad et al.; ‘Distribution of Pancreatic Peptide and Peptide-YY’; Peptides; V. 23; pp. 251-261;2002. |
Greenough et al.; ‘Untangling the Effects of Hunger, Anxiety and Nausea on Energy Intake During Intravenous Cholecystokinin Octapeptide (CCK-8) Infusion’ Physiology and Behavior; V. 65 (2); pp. 303-310; 1998. |
Hallden et al. “Evidence for a Role of the Gut Hormone PYY in the Regulation of Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein Transcripts in Differentiated Subpopulations of Intestinal Epithelial Cell Hybrids”; Journal of Biological Chemistry; V. 272 (19); pp. 125916-126000; 1997. |
Houpt; ‘Gastrointestinal Factors in Hunger and Satiety’; Neurosci. and Behav. Rev.; V. 6; pp. 145-164; 1982. |
Kissileff et al.; ‘Peptides that Regulate Food Intake: Cholecystokinin and Stomach Distension Combine to Reduce Food Intake in Humans’; Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.; V. 285; pp. 992-998; 2003. |
Naslund et al.; ‘Prandial Subcutaneous Injection of Glucagon-Like Peptide’; Br. J. Nutr.; V. 91; pp. 439-446; 2004. |
Renshaw et al. ‘Peptide YY: A Potential Therapy for Obesity’; Current Drug Targets; V. 6; pp. 171-179; 2005. |
Verdich et al. ‘A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 (7-36) Amide on ad Libitum Energy Intake in Humans’; J. Clin. Endocrinal. Metab. V. 86; pp. 4382-4389; Sep. 2001. |
Wynne et al.; ‘Subcutaneous Oxyntomodulin Reduces Body Weight in Overweight and Obese Subiects: A Double-Blind Randomized, Controlled Trial’: Diabetes; V. 54; pp. 2390-2395; 2005. |
BIB Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon Program, ‘Take Control of Your Weight and Your Life/The Solution for You,’ Inamed Health, pp. 1-2; Jan. 19, 2004. |
BIB Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon Program, ‘Taking the Next Step/Take Control of Your Weight and Your Life,’ Inamed Health, pp. 1-9; Apr. 29, 2004. |
BIB Data Sheet Directions for Use, ‘BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon System,’ Inamed Health, 1-12 pp. |
‘Living With the Bib/BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon Program,’ Inamed Health; 1-10 Patient Information Brochure; pp.; May 1, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120095496 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61394708 | Oct 2010 | US | |
61394592 | Oct 2010 | US | |
61394145 | Oct 2010 | US |