The present disclosure is related to a method and system for improving the performance of components that make up operations in a plant, such as a carbonaceous processing plant, a chemical plant, a petrochemical plant, or a refinery. Typical plants may be those that provide catalytic dehydrogenation or hydrocarbon cracking.
A plant or refinery may include one or more pieces of equipment for performing a process. Equipment may break down over time, and need to be repaired or replaced. Additionally, a process may be more or less efficient depending on one or more operating characteristics. There will always be a need for improving process efficiencies and improving equipment reliability.
The following summary presents a simplified summary of certain features. The summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical elements.
One or more embodiments may include a system that includes a reactor; a heater; a compressor comprising one or more injection ports; one or more sensors associated with the compressor; a data collection platform, and/or a data analysis platform. The data collection platform may include one or more processors of the data collection platform; a communication interface of the data collection platform; and computer-readable memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: receive, from the one or more sensors associated with the compressor, sensor data associated with the compressor and collected by the one or more sensors associated with the compressor; and send the sensor data associated with the compressor and collected by the one or more sensors associated with the compressor. The data analysis platform may include one or more processors of the data analysis platform; a communication interface of the data analysis platform; and computer-readable memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: receive the sensor data associated with the compressor and collected by the one or more sensors associated with the compressor; analyze the sensor data associated with the compressor to determine potential fouling within the compressor; and based on determining the potential fouling within the compressor, send a command configured to cause an online wash via the one or more injection ports of the compressor to reduce the potential fouling within the compressor.
One or more embodiments may include one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause a data analysis platform to: receive sensor data associated with a compressor comprising one or more injection ports and collected by one or more sensors associated with the compressor; analyze the sensor data associated with the compressor to determine potential fouling within the compressor; and based on determining the potential fouling within the compressor, send a command configured to cause an online wash via the one or more injection ports of the compressor to reduce the potential fouling within the compressor.
One or more embodiments may include a method including receiving, by a data analysis computing device, sensor data associated with a compressor comprising one or more injection ports and collected by one or more sensors associated with the compressor; analyzing, by the data analysis computing device, the sensor data associated with the compressor to determine potential fouling within the compressor; and based on determining the potential fouling within the compressor, sending, by the data analysis computing device, a command configured to cause an online wash via the one or more injection ports of the compressor to reduce the potential fouling within the compressor.
Other technical features may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
In the following description of various illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, various embodiments in which aspects of the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be used, and structural and functional modifications may be made, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
It is noted that various connections between elements are discussed in the following description. It is noted that these connections are general and, unless specified otherwise, may be direct or indirect, wired or wireless, and that the specification is not intended to be limiting in this respect.
A chemical plant or a petrochemical plant or a refinery may include one or more pieces of equipment that process one or more input chemicals to create one or more products. For example, catalytic dehydrogenation can be used to convert paraffins to the corresponding olefin, e.g., propane to propene, or butane to butene.
A multitude of process equipment may be used in the chemical, refining, and petrochemical industry including, but not limited to, slide valves, rotating equipment, pumps, compressors, heat exchangers, fired heaters, control valves, fractionation columns, reactors, and/or shut-off valves.
Elements of chemical and petrochemical/refinery plants may be exposed to the outside and thus can be exposed to various environmental stresses. Such stresses may be weather related, such as temperature extremes (hot and cold), high-wind conditions, and precipitation conditions such as snow, ice, and rain. Other environmental conditions may be pollution particulates, such as dust and pollen, or salt if located near an ocean, for example. Such stresses can affect the performance and lifetime of equipment in the plants. Different locations may have different environmental stresses. For example, a refinery in Texas may have different stresses than a chemical plant in Montana.
Process equipment may deteriorate over time, affecting the performance and integrity of the process. Such deteriorating equipment may ultimately fail, but before failing, may decrease efficiency, yield, and/or product properties. It is desirable that corrective actions be taken in advance of equipment inefficiencies and/or failure.
The reactor section 10 includes one or more reactors 25. A hydrocarbon feed 30 is sent to a heat exchanger 35 where it exchanges heat with a reactor effluent 40 to raise the feed temperature. The feed 30 is sent to a preheater 45 where it is heated to the desired inlet temperature. The preheated feed 50 is sent from the preheater 45 to the first reactor 25. Because the dehydrogenation reaction is endothermic, the temperature of the effluent 55 from the first reactor 25 is less than the temperature of the preheated feed 50. The effluent 55 is sent to interstage heaters 60 to raise the temperature to the desired inlet temperature for the next reactor 25.
After the last reactor, the reactor effluent 40 is sent to the heat exchanger 35, and heat is exchanged with the feed 30. The reactor effluent 40 is then sent to the product recovery section 20. The catalyst 65 moves through the series of reactors 25. When the catalyst 70 leaves the last reactor 25, it is sent to the catalyst regeneration section 15. The catalyst regeneration section 15 includes a regenerator 75 where coke on the catalyst is burned off and the catalyst may go through a reconditioning step. A regenerated catalyst 80 is sent back to the first reactor 25.
The reactor effluent 40 is compressed in the compressor or centrifugal compressor 82. The compressed effluent 115 is introduced to a cooler 120, for instance a heat exchanger. The cooler 120 lowers the temperature of the compressed effluent. The cooled effluent 125 (cooled product stream) is then introduced into a chloride remover 130, such as a chloride scavenging guard bed. The chloride remover 130 includes an adsorbent, which adsorbs chlorides from the cooled effluent 125 and provides a treated effluent 135. Treated effluent 135 is introduced to a drier 84.
The dried effluent is separated in separator 85. Gas 90 is expanded in expander 95 and separated into a recycle hydrogen stream 100 and a net separator gas stream 105. A liquid stream 110, which includes the olefin product and unconverted paraffin, is sent for further processing, where the desired olefin product is recovered and the unconverted paraffin is recycled to the dehydrogenation reactor 25.
The spent or coked catalyst, following its disengagement or separation from the product gas stream, requires regeneration for further use. This coked catalyst first falls into a dense bed stripping section of the FCC reactor, into which steam is injected, through a nozzle and distributor, to purge any residual hydrocarbon vapors that would be detrimental to the operation of the regenerator. After this purging or stripping operation, the coked catalyst is fed by gravity to the catalyst regenerator through a spent catalyst standpipe.
In the FCC recovery section, the product gas stream exiting the FCC reactor is fed to a bottom section of an FCC main fractionation column. Several product fractions may be separated on the basis of their relative volatilities and recovered from this main fractionation column. Representative product fractions include, for example, naphtha (or FCC gasoline), light cycle oil, and heavy cycle oil.
Other petrochemical processes produce desirable products, such as turbine fuel, diesel fuel and other products referred to as middle distillates, as well as lower boiling hydrocarbonaceous liquids, such as naphtha and gasoline, by hydrocracking a hydrocarbon feedstock derived from crude oil or heavy fractions thereof. Feedstocks most often subjected to hydrocracking are the gas oils and heavy gas oils recovered from crude oil by distillation.
References herein to a “plant” are to be understood to refer to any of various types of chemical and petrochemical manufacturing or refining facilities. References herein to a plant “operators” are to be understood to refer to and/or include, without limitation, plant planners, managers, engineers, technicians, operators, and others interested in, overseeing, and/or running the daily operations at a plant.
Rotating Equipment Technology
A system or arrangement as described above may include various compressors, pumps, and/or turbines, and
There are several types of compressors typically used in chemical and petrochemical plants and refineries, the most common of which are centrifugal compressors, axial compressors, and reciprocating compressors. Many compressors in a plant as described herein are arranged in parallel with a redundant backup compressor, which can be activated to prevent total shutdown when the original compressor needs to be taken offline. Centrifugal and axial compressors are dynamic compressors that operate by transferring energy from a set of rotating impeller blades to a gas, which is then converted into potential energy in the form of increased gas pressure by diffusers that slow the flow of the gas, creating a pressurized output gas.
Centrifugal or axial compressors may be referred to as dynamic compressors or turbomachinery. Such compressors often have other components immediately upstream and downstream that enhance or enable the functioning of the compressor. Examples of such equipment include isolation valves, a suction strainers, a compressor suction drum or separator, an anti-surge spillback takeoff, a feed mix node and combined feed exchanger for H2 recycle, and an interstage drum or knockout drum.
Performance of all types of compressors may be affected by changes in gas conditions, including gas temperature and the composition and/or molecular weight of the gas, among other factors. Process control of capacity may be made by speed variation, suction throttling, or variable inlet guide vanes. Compressors can be put through a variety of extreme conditions, such as high temperatures and pressures and corrosive and aggressive components.
Surge is a common issue faced by all centrifugal and axial compressors. Surge occurs when the outlet or discharge pressure of the compressor is equal to or greater than the pressure generated by the impellers 313, 323. In a centrifugal or axial compressor, this phenomenon typically occurs within the final diffuser 316, 326 before the outlet 317, 327. When this occurs, the increased outlet pressure drives airflow temporarily backward toward the impeller or impellers 313, 323. Surge typically happens in an oscillatory manner and is often accompanied by rapid (even exponential) temperature increase. Various factors can cause surging, such as increased discharge pressure, improper valve cycling, change in gas composition (e.g., decreased molecular weight of the gas), ramping the feed rate too fast, improper limit stop set point on the valves, and other operational errors or malfunctions, among other factors. Surge can decrease the effectiveness and efficiency of the compressor, and the vibrations, thrust reversals, and temperature increases that result from surging can damage components of the compressor (sometimes quickly) and reduce the functional life of the compressor. For example, vibrations and thrust reversal can cause damage to bearings and seals, and potentially cause contact between rotating and stationary parts. As another example, temperature increases can cause damage to seals, thermal expansion of the rotor/impeller, and contact between rotating and stationary parts.
Each dynamic compressor has a surge limit that represents a limit on operation of the compressor.
Additional issues faced by centrifugal or axial compressors include bearing and seal failures, wear, fouling, and damage from contact between moving and non-moving components, among others. Such failures may be caused by vibrations, thrust reversals, excessive temperature, and unwanted chemicals in the feed gas. Some of these issues may directly or indirectly result from surging, but these issues may result from other causes as well, including other causes described elsewhere herein.
A reciprocating compressor is a positive-displacement compressor that operates by a moveable member, e.g., a piston and/or a membrane/diaphragm, moving to decrease the volume of a cylinder filled with a gas, thereby compressing the gas within the cylinder.
Reciprocating compressors often have other components immediately upstream and downstream that enhance or enable the functioning of the compressor. Examples of such equipment include an isolation valve, a suction strainer, an interstage cooler or aftercooler, and a discharge drum.
One issue facing reciprocating compressors is ingress of liquid contaminants, which may occur through a variety of mechanisms, such as improper separation between gas and liquid components at some point along the line, seal leakage, condensation caused by insufficient temperature at some point along the line and compounded by poor suction pipe layout. Liquids are incompressible, and therefore, ingress of liquids into the compressor can negatively affect operation of the compressor. Other contaminants, such as particulates or debris entrained in the gas flow, also present issues for reciprocating compressors. Ingress of liquid or other contaminants can damage a reciprocating compressor, and in particular may cause valve distress and failure. Ingress of such contaminants may also cause fouling of equipment, process drifting, and/or decreasing capacity and efficiency.
A turbine is a device that extracts energy from a fluid flow and converts it into work, e.g., mechanical or electrical power.
Issues faced by turbines in petrochemical plants include failure of trip and throttle valves, damage to flow path components (e.g., stationary or rotating blades) due to “wet” steam that is not of sufficiently high temperature, and failure of the turbine for mechanical reasons.
In various embodiments described herein, as described in further detail below, different types of sensors may be used in and around rotating equipment components such as compressors and turbines, including centrifugal compressors, axial compressors, reciprocating compressors, and/or steam turbines as described above. Data from such sensors can then be analyzed in a manual and/or automated manner, and corrective actions or recommendations for such actions can be generated based on such analysis. It is understood that any sensor described herein may be configured for communicating the data gathered by the sensor to a computer system, including by various wired or wireless technologies. In one or more embodiments, each sensor described herein may include a wireless transmitter (or transceiver) for wirelessly communicating with a computer system. In another embodiment, some or all of the sensors described herein may include an individual processor and/or memory configured for processing communications to/from the computer system or processing and/or storing data independently or in conjunction with the computer system.
Sensor Data Collection and Processing
The system may include one or more computing devices or platforms for collecting, storing, processing, and analyzing data from one or more sensors.
Although the computing system environment of
In yet another example, the data collection platform 1002 and data analysis platform 1004 may reside on a single server computer and depicted as a single, combined logical box on a system diagram. Moreover, a data store may be illustrated in
Referring to
In addition, sensors may include transmitters and/or deviation alarms. One or more sensors may be programmed to set off an alarm or alert. For example, if an actuator fails, sensor data may be used to automatically trigger an alarm or alert (e.g., an audible alarm or alert, a visual alarm or alert). Other sensors may transmit signals to a processor or a hub that collects the data and sends to a processor. For example, temperature and pressure measurements may be sent to a hub (e.g., data collection platform 1002). In one or more embodiments, temperature sensors 1012 may include thermocouples, fiber optic temperature measurement, thermal cameras 1020, and/or infrared cameras. Skin thermocouples may be applied to rotating equipment casing, or alternatively, to tubes, plates, or placed directly on a wall of a rotating equipment component. Alternatively, thermal (infrared) cameras 1020 may be used to detect temperature in one or more aspects of the equipment. A shielded (insulated) tube skin thermocouple assembly may be used to obtain accurate measurements. One example of a thermocouple may be a removable Xtracto™ Pad. A thermocouple can be replaced without any additional welding. Clips and/or pads may be used for ease of replacement. Fiber Optic cable can be attached to the pipe, line, and/or vessel to provide a complete profile of temperatures.
Sensors may be also used throughout a plant or rotating equipment to detect and monitor various issues such as PV detection, surge detection, fouling, gas quality, dew point characteristics, and/or production levels. Sensors might be able to detect whether feed composition into the rotating equipment, such as pH, are outside of acceptable ranges leading to a corrosive environment or whether consumption of sacrificial anodes (in water services) is nearing completion and resulting in a corrosive environment. Sensors detecting outlet temperatures and pressure drops may be used to determine/predict flow and production rate changes.
Furthermore, flow sensors may be used in flow paths such as the inlet to the path, outlet from the path, or within the path. If multiple tubes are used, the flow sensors may be placed in corresponding positions in each of the rotating machines. In this manner, one can determine if one of the rotating machines is behaving abnormally compared to one or more others. Flow may be determined by pressure-drop across a known resistance, such as by using pressure taps. In other examples, flow may be inferred using fluid density in addition to suction and discharge pressures. Other types of flow sensors include, but are not limited to, ultrasonic, turbine meter, hot wire anemometer, vane meter, Kármán™, vortex sensor, membrane sensor (membrane has a thin film temperature sensor printed on the upstream side, and one on the downstream side), tracer, radiographic imaging (e.g. identify two-phase vs. single-phase region of channels), an orifice plate (e.g., which may in some examples, be placed in front of one or more tube or channels), pitot tube, thermal conductivity flow meter, anemometer, internal pressure flow profile.
Sensor data, process measurements, and/or calculations made using the sensor data or process measurements may be used to monitor and/or improve the performance of the equipment and parts making up the equipment, as discussed in further detail below. For example, sensor data may be used to detect that a desirable or an undesirable chemical reaction is taking place within a particular piece of equipment, and one or more actions may be taken to encourage or inhibit the chemical reaction. Chemical sensors may be used to detect the presence of one or more chemicals or components in the streams, such as corrosive species, oxygen, hydrogen, and/or water (moisture). Chemical sensors may use gas chromatographs, liquid chromatographs, distillation measurements, and/or octane measurements. In another example, equipment information, such as wear, efficiency, production, state, or other condition information, may be gathered and determined based on sensor data. Corrective action may be taken based on determining this equipment information. For example, if the equipment is showing signs of wear or failure, corrective actions may be taken, such as taking an inventory of parts to ensure replacement parts are available, ordering replacement parts, and/or calling in repair personnel to the site. Certain parts of equipment may be replaced immediately. Other parts may be safe to use, but a monitoring schedule may be adjusted. Alternatively or additionally, one or more inputs or controls relating to a process may be adjusted as part of the corrective action. These and other details about the equipment, sensors, processing of sensor data, and actions taken based on sensor data are described in further detail below.
Monitoring the rotating equipment and the processes using rotating equipment includes collecting data that can be correlated and used to predict behavior or problems in different rotating equipment used in the same plant or in other plants and/or processes. Data collected from the various sensors (e.g., measurements such as flow, pressure drop, thermal performance, vessel skin temperature at the top, expansion bellows leak, vibration, etc.) may be correlated with external data, such as environmental or weather data. Process changes or operating conditions may be able to be altered to preserve the equipment until the next scheduled maintenance period. Fluids may be monitored for corrosive contaminants and pH may monitored in order to predict higher than normal corrosion rates within the rotating equipment.
Systems Facilitating Sensor Data Collection
Sensor data may be collected by a data collection platform 1002. The sensors may interface with the data collection platform 1002 via wired or wireless transmissions. The data collection platform 1002 may continuously or periodically (e.g., every second, every minute, every hour, every day, once a week, once a month) transmit collected sensor data to a data analysis platform 1004, which may be nearby or remote from the data collection platform 1002.
Sensor data (e.g., temperature data) may be collected continuously or at periodic intervals (e.g., every second, every five seconds, every ten seconds, every minute, every five minutes, every ten minutes, every hour, every two hours, every five hours, every twelve hours, every day, every other day, every week, every other week, every month, every other month, every six months, every year, or another interval). Data may be collected at different locations at different intervals. For example, data at a known hot spot may be collected at a first interval, and data at a spot that is not a known hot spot may be collected at a second interval. The data collection platform transmit collected sensor data to a data analysis platform, which may be nearby or remote from the data collection platform.
The computing system environment of
In addition, the platform and/or devices in
Furthermore, the platform and/or devices in
In some examples, one or more sensor devices in
Referring to
In addition, the data collection module 1066 may assist the processor 1060 in the data collection platform 1002 in communicating with, via the communications interface 1068, and processing data received from other sources, such as data feeds from third-party servers and manual entry at the field site from a dashboard graphical user interface (e.g., via dashboard 1003). For example, a third-party server may provide contemporaneous weather data to the data collection module. Some elements of chemical and petrochemical/refinery plants may be exposed to the outside and thus may be exposed to various environmental stresses. Such stresses may be weather related such as temperature extremes (hot and cold), high wind conditions, and precipitation conditions such as snow, ice, and rain. Other environmental conditions may be pollution particulates such as dust and pollen, or salt if located near an ocean, for example. Such stresses can affect the performance and lifetime of equipment in the plants. Different locations may have different environmental stresses. For example, a refinery in Texas will have different stresses than a chemical plant in Montana. In another example, data manually entered from a dashboard graphical user interface (e.g., via dashboard 1003) (or other means) may be collected and saved into memory by the data collection module. Production rates may be entered and saved in memory. Tracking production rates may indicate issues with flows. For example, as fouling occurs, the production rate may fall if a specific outlet temperature can no longer be achieved at the targeted capacity and capacity has to be reduced to maintain the targeted outlet temperature.
Referring to
Referring to
Although the elements of
Referring to
In a plant environment such as illustrated in
Referring to
Although
Although the elements of
Referring to
The aforementioned cloud computing infrastructure may use a data collection platform 1002 associated with a plant to capture data, e.g., sensor measurements, which may be automatically sent to the cloud infrastructure, which may be remotely located, where it may be reviewed to, for example, eliminate errors and biases, and used to calculate and report performance results. The data collection platform 1002 may include an optimization unit that acquires data from a customer site, other site, and/or plant (e.g., sensors and other data collectors at a plant) on a recurring basis. For cleansing, the data may be analyzed for completeness and corrected for gross errors by the optimization unit. The data may also be corrected for measurement issues (e.g., an accuracy problem for establishing a simulation steady state) and overall mass balance closure to generate a duplicate set of reconciled plant data. The corrected data may be used as an input to a simulation process, in which the process model is tuned to ensure that the simulation process matches the reconciled plant data. An output of the reconciled plant data may be used to generate predicted data using a collection of virtual process model objects as a unit of process design.
The performance of the plant and/or individual process units of the plant is/are compared to the performance predicted by one or more process models to identify any operating differences or gaps. Furthermore, the process models and collected data (e.g., plant operation information) may be used to run optimization routines that converge on an optimal plant operation for a given values of, e.g., feed, products, and/or prices. A routine may be understood to refer to a sequence of computer programs or instructions for performing a particular task.
The data analysis platform 1004 may include an analysis unit that determines operating status, based on at least one of a kinetic model, a parametric model, an analytical tool, and/or a related knowledge and/or best practice standard. The analysis unit may receive historical and/or current performance data from one or a plurality of plants to proactively predict one or more future actions to be performed. To predict various limits of a particular process and stay within the acceptable range of limits, the analysis unit may determine target operational parameters of a final product based on actual current and/or historical operational parameters. This evaluation by the analysis unit may be used to proactively predict future actions to be performed. In another example, the analysis unit may establish a boundary or threshold of an operating parameter of the plant based on at least one of an existing limit and an operation condition. In yet another example, the analysis unit may establish a relationship between at least two operational parameters related to a specific process for the operation of the plant. Finally in yet another example, one or more of the aforementioned examples may be performed with or without a combination of the other examples.
The plant process model predicts plant performance that is expected based upon the plant operation information. The plant process model results can be used to monitor the health of the plant and to determine whether any upset or poor measurement occurred. The plant process model is desirably generated by an iterative process that models at various plant constraints to determine the desired plant process model.
Using a web-based system for implementing the method of this disclosure may provide one or more benefits, such as improved plant performance due to an increased ability by plant operators to identify and capture opportunities, a sustained ability to bridge plant performance gaps, and/or an increased ability to leverage personnel expertise and improve training and development. Some of the methods disclosed herein allow for automated daily evaluation of process performance, thereby increasing the frequency of performance review with less time and effort required from plant operations staff.
Further, the analytics unit may be partially or fully automated. In one or more embodiments, the system is performed by a computer system, such as a third-party computer system, remote from the plant and/or the plant planning center. The system may receive signals and parameters via the communication network, and displays in real time related performance information on an interactive display device accessible to an operator or user. The web-based platform allows all users to work with the same information, thereby creating a collaborative environment for sharing best practices or for troubleshooting. The method further provides more accurate prediction and optimization results due to fully configured models. Routine automated evaluation of plant planning and operation models allows timely plant model tuning to reduce or eliminate gaps between plant models and the actual plant performance. Implementing the aforementioned methods using the web-based platform also allows for monitoring and updating multiple sites, thereby better enabling facility planners to propose realistic optimal targets.
As shown in
First, the one or more devices may collect 1402 sensor data. The sensor data may be from one or more sensors attached to one or more pieces of equipment (e.g., rotating equipment) in a plant. The sensor data may be locally collected and processed and/or may be locally collected and transmitted for processing.
After the sensor data is collected, the one or more devices may process 1404 the sensor data. The one or more devices may compare the data to past data from the one or more pieces of equipment, other pieces of equipment at a same plant, one or more pieces of equipment at a different plant, manufacturer recommendations or specifications, or the like.
After the sensor data is processed, the one or more devices may determine 1406 one or more recommendations based on the sensor data. The one or more recommendations may include recommendations of one or more actions to take based on the sensor data.
The one or more devices may send 1408 one or more alerts, which may include the determined recommendation. The one or more alerts may include information about the sensor data, about other data, or the like.
The one or more devices may receive 1410 a command to take an action (e.g., the recommended action, an action other than the recommended action, or no action). After receiving the command, the one or more devices may take 1412 the action. The action may, in some embodiments, include one or more corrective actions, which may cause one or more changes in the operation of the one or more pieces of equipment. The corrective action(s) may be taken automatically or after user confirmation, and/or the corrective action(s) may be taken without an accompanying alert being generated (and vice-versa).
The graphical user interface 1200 may include one or more visual representations of data (e.g., chart, graph, etc.) that shows information about a plant, a particular piece of equipment in a plant, or a process performed by a plant or a particular piece or combination of equipment in the plant. For example, a graph may show information about an operating condition, an efficiency, a production level, or the like. The graphical user interface 1200 may include a description of the equipment, the combination of equipment, or the plant to which the visual display of information pertains.
The graphical user interface 1200 may display the information for a particular time or period of time (e.g., the last five minutes, the last ten minutes, the last hour, the last two hours, the last 12 hours, the last 24 hours, etc.). The graphical user interface may be adjustable to show different ranges of time, automatically or based on user input.
The graphical user interface 1200 may include one or more buttons that allow a user to take one or more actions. For example, the graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., an “Actions” button) that, when pressed, shows one or more actions available to the user. The graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., a “Change View” button) that, when pressed, changes one or more views of one or more elements of the graphical user interface. The graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., a “Settings” button) that, when pressed, shows one or more settings of the application of which the graphical user interface is a part. The graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., a “Refresh Data” button) that, when pressed, refreshes data displayed by the graphical user interface. In some aspects, data displayed by the graphical user interface may be refreshed in real time, according to a preset schedule (e.g., every five seconds, every ten seconds, every minute, etc.), and/or in response to a refresh request received from a user. The graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., a “Send Data” button) that, when pressed, allows a user to send data to one or more other devices. For example, the user may be able to send data via email, SMS, text message, iMessage, FTP, cloud sharing, AirDrop, or via some other method. The user may be able to select one or more pieces of data, graphics, charts, graphs, elements of the display, or the like to share or send. The graphical user interface may include a button (e.g., an “Analyze Data” button) that, when pressed, causes one or more data analysis functions to be performed. In some aspects, the user may provide additional input about the desired data analysis, such as desired input, desired output, desired granularity, desired time to complete the data analysis, desired time of input data, or the like.
The graphical user interface 1300 may include one or more buttons that, when pressed, cause one or more actions to be taken. For example, the graphical user interface 1300 may include a button that, when pressed, causes a flow rate to change. In another example, the graphical user interface 1300 may include a button that, when pressed, sends an alert to a contact (e.g., via a remote device), the alert including information similar to the information included in the alert provided via the graphical user interface. In a further example, the graphical user interface 1300 may include a button that, when pressed, shows one or more other actions that may be taken (e.g., additional corrective actions).
Reactor Loop Fouling Monitor
In one or more embodiments, one or more sensors may be used in conjunction with a centrifugal or axial compressor to detect potential fouling in the equipment and allow corrective actions to be taken. Fouling can occur in multiple locations on a dynamic compressor, and a frequent source of problems is fouling from buildup of nitrogen salts on the impeller blades, especially in a recycle gas compressor. If fouling can be detected at an early stage, corrective actions can be taken to address the fouling rather than shutting down the entire process. An automated technique for detecting and managing potential fouling can prevent unscheduled shutdowns of equipment.
A centrifugal compressor 310 as shown in
Sensors placed in and around the compressor can collect data relevant to potential fouling and transmit the data to a computer system, which can analyze the data to determine whether fouling exists, determine a degree of fouling, or predict a future occurrence and/or degree of fouling. In particular, the system may be configured to detect and/or predict fouling of the impeller blades for the compressor. In one or more embodiments, pressure and vibration data collected by the sensors 355, 356 may be used in this analysis. Additionally, the pressure and vibration data and analysis thereof may be based on the compressor as a whole or, in the case of a centrifugal compressor 310, may be based on each individual impeller 313. Analysis of data on a per-impeller basis can permit detection of whether fouling is limited to a particular impeller or impellers, so that corrective actions can be taken with respect to the particular impeller(s). The computer system may be configured to determine the extent of the vibration and pressure and/or the deviation of the vibration and pressure from standard operation.
Sensor information may be gathered by one or more sensors and transmitted to data collection platform. Data collection platform may transmit the collected sensor data to data analysis platform, which may be at a plant or remote from a plant (e.g., in the cloud). Data analysis platform may analyze the received sensor data. Data analysis platform may compare the sensor data to one or more rules to determine if any of the issues disclosed herein are occurring. For example, detecting of fouling of the impeller blades for a compressor may be indicated if in one or more conditions are met: (1) sensing of increased vibrations and/or (2) measuring of decreased output pressure. Furthermore, data analysis platform may compare current sensor data to past sensor data from the rotating equipment, from other rotating equipment at the same plant, from other rotating equipment at other plants, from a manufacturer, or the like. Data analysis platform may determine if one or more data characteristics of the sensor data match data that may indicate any of the issues disclosed herein.
Data analysis platform may further run process simulations to suggest changes to operating parameters of the rotating equipment and associated components to avoid or limit further damage by one or more of the issues disclosed herein. In some aspects, data analysis platform may communicate with one or more vendors regarding the results of the simulation, and receive recommendations from the vendor on how to change or optimize parameters (e.g., geometry) of the equipment. Data analysis platform may use this information to create or expand a searchable database.
In one or more embodiments, the P and vibration data may be compared to current or archived P and vibration data for the same compressor and/or other compressors, and the computer system can analyze the data to make useful determinations, such as whether the data indicates that potential fouling exists or will exist and/or making predictions regarding future operation. Corrective actions can be taken if deviations are determined to exist, and if such deviations are determined to be potentially indicative of fouling. The data comparison may be made across a variety of time frames, from a time frame of a few minutes or hours, to real-time continuous comparison, to historical comparison over a period of months or more, and may include absolute and proportional comparisons. As one example, fouling may be detected if the P and/or vibration of the compressor (or an individual impeller) is found to differ by a set percentage (e.g., +/−5% or 10%) from normal operation data. As another example, a deviation may be detected if the P and/or vibration of the compressor (or an individual impeller) exceeds a specific absolute threshold, either as a set threshold or as a set absolute difference from normal operation data. The data analysis may be done over one or more different time frames, and the deviation percentage or threshold may depend on the time frame for comparison. In one or more embodiments, the difference from normal operation data required to detect a deviation over a short time frame may be relatively large as compared to analysis of a longer time frame, which may require a relatively smaller difference to detect a deviation. For example, a gradual but consistent increase or decrease in pressure or vibration over a long time frame may be used in predicting long-term failure. For detecting fouling of impeller blades in particular, vibration data often follows a predictable increase over time when monitored continuously. But such vibration data may, in some embodiments, be more effective in predicting fouling when considered in conjunction with other data (e.g., pressure data).
The data comparison may also be made with respect to various different pieces of equipment. As one example, the data comparison may be limited to only the compressor (or impeller) in question. As another example, the data comparison may be made relative to other compressors (or impellers) in the system, and potentially to all other compressors (or impellers) of the same type within the system. As a further example, the data comparison may be made relative to historical data, including historical data for the same compressor (or impeller) or historical data for other compressors (or impellers). It is understood that data analysis does not necessarily need to be done for the purpose of detecting deviations, as described in greater detail below. For example, data comparison that indicates consistency with historical data for a compressor (or impeller) that exhibited fouling may be valuable in predicting whether and when a specific degree of fouling will occur.
The data used for the comparison may also depend on the stage of operation of the compressor. For example, start-up or shut-down of the machine may place increased stresses on the system and may require different data comparison. Different criteria (% or threshold) for deviation from normal operation may be applied during start-up or shut-down. Different comparison data may be used for analysis during start-up or shut-down as well, such as comparison to other start-up or shut-down data, rather than data from steady operation. As another example, different criteria and/or comparison data may be used during particular environmental conditions, such as based on a particular season or weather phenomenon.
In another example, the P and vibration data can be compared to previous trend or pattern P or vibration data from the same or other compressors (or impellers). In this example, the overall trend or pattern of the P and vibration data for a compressor (or impeller) may be analyzed to determine which previous data sets match most closely to the present data. Once one or more similar trends in P or vibration data are matched, the matched data sets may provide useful predictive value. For example, matched data may be valuable in predicting whether and when a specific degree of fouling will occur and/or which solutions may be effectively implemented to address an actual or potential fouling issue. In particular, corrective actions that were effective for treating issues for a past compressor or impeller with matching data may be used with some expectation of effectiveness.
Based on the analysis and comparison of data described herein, the computer system may take various actions, including corrective actions, notifications, predictions, etc. Corrective actions may include actions to correct a present fouling condition or prophylactic actions to address predicted future fouling conditions. The corrective actions taken may depend on a degree of fouling detected or predicted. For example, the system can recommend and/or initiate alternative processes to preserve the life of the compressor. Such alternative processes that can be implemented include running an online wash, adjusting processing parameters, feed type/quality, and/or upstream or downstream unit operations, slowing the impeller speed, adding (or putting online) a guard bed that pulls nitrogen out of the feed gas, using a feed gas with less nitrogen, or a combination of such actions, or other actions. In a centrifugal compressor, some alternative processes or other corrective actions may be taken on an individual impeller or impellers where possible. For example, as shown in
The above analysis and/or actions may further incorporate additional data gathered by additional sensors in and around the compressor and/or elsewhere in the system in other embodiments. This additional data may influence determinations of potential problems and goals or may influence the corrective actions that are suggested and implemented. For example, temperature sensors may be used in addition to or instead of vibration sensors for detecting and predicting fouling in one or more embodiments. As another example, the ΔP data from a suction strainer or a CFE may be used to detect or predict fouling in those components.
Additionally, the principles for detection and prediction of fouling described herein may be applied to detection and prediction of fouling for other equipment within the plant or components of such equipment. Examples of other equipment that may be suitable for use with these principles include (without limitation) an FCC main air blower, an FCC wet gas compressor, an Oleflex main reactor effluent compressor, a hydrotreating recycle machine, compressors in MTO and olefin recovery applications, and a crude saturated gas compressor.
Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. Numerous other embodiments, modifications, and variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims will occur to persons of ordinary skill in the art from a review of this disclosure. For example, one or more of the steps illustrated in the illustrative figures may be performed in other than the recited order, and one or more depicted steps may be optional in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/477,876, filed Mar. 28, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4380146 | Yannone | Apr 1983 | A |
5077252 | Owen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5605435 | Haugen | Feb 1997 | A |
5666297 | Britt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6038540 | Krist et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6392114 | Shields et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6760716 | Ganesamoorthi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772044 | Mathur et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795798 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7006889 | Mathur et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7067333 | Pasadyn et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7133807 | Karasawa | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7246039 | Moorhouse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7313447 | Hsuing et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7415357 | Stluka et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7567887 | Emigholz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7742833 | Herbst et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7877596 | Foo Kune et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7925979 | Forney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936878 | Kune et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7979192 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995526 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8050889 | Fluegge et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055371 | Sanford et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8111619 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8204717 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244384 | Pachner et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280057 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8352049 | Hsiung et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8385436 | Holm et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8428067 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8458778 | Budampati et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8571064 | Kore et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8644192 | Budampati et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8811231 | Budampati et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923882 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9134717 | Trnka | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166667 | Thanikachalam | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176498 | Baramov | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9864823 | Horn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9968899 | Gellaboina et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10095200 | Horn et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10180680 | Horn et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10183266 | Victor et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10222787 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10328408 | Victor et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20020123864 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020179495 | Heyse et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030147351 | Greenlee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040079392 | Kuechler | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099572 | Evans | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109788 | Li et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040204775 | Keyes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220689 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220778 | Imai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027721 | Saenz | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050216209 | Evans | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020423 | Sharpe, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060133412 | Callaghan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060259163 | Hsiung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020154 | Evans | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070059159 | Hjerpe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059838 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091824 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091825 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070185664 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192078 | Nasle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070250292 | Alagappan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271452 | Foo Kune et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080086322 | Wallace | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130902 | Foo Kune et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080217005 | Stluka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080282606 | Plaza et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059786 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060192 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064295 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090201899 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245286 | Kore et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268674 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100014599 | Holm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100108567 | Medoff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125347 | Martin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100158764 | Hedrick | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100262900 | Romatier et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110112659 | Pachner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152590 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152591 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110311014 | Hottovy et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120083933 | Subbu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095808 | Kattapuram et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104295 | Do et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121376 | Huis in Het Veld | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123583 | Hazen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120197616 | Trnka | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259583 | Noboa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029587 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130079899 | Baramov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090088 | Chevsky et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094422 | Thanikachalam | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130253898 | Meagher et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270157 | Ferrara | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311437 | Stluka et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140074273 | Mohideen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114039 | Benham et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140131027 | Chir | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163275 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140179968 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140212978 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229121 | Greco | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140294683 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140294684 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296058 | Sechrist et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309756 | Trygstad | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337256 | Varadi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150077263 | Ali et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078970 | Iddir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098862 | Lok et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150185716 | Wichmann et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276208 | Maturana et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330571 | Beuneken | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160033941 | T et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098037 | Zornio et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160147204 | Wichmann et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160237910 | Saito | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160260041 | Horn et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291584 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292188 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292325 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170026598 | Fahim et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170058213 | Oprins | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170082320 | Wang | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170284410 | Sharpe, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315543 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323038 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352899 | Asai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180046155 | Horn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180081344 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082569 | Horn et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180121581 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180122021 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180155638 | Al-Ghamdi | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180155642 | Al-Ghamdi et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180197350 | Kim | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180275690 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275691 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275692 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180280914 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280917 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282633 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282634 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282635 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283368 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283392 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283404 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283811 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283812 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283813 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283815 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283816 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283818 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284705 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286141 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180311609 | McCool et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180362862 | Gellaboina et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363914 | Faiella et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180364747 | Charr et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190002318 | Thakkar et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003978 | Shi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190015806 | Gellaboina et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190041813 | Horn et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083920 | Bjorklund et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190101336 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101342 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101907 | Charr et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190108454 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190120810 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151814 | Victor et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190155259 | Romatier et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Jul. 12, 2018—(WO) International Search Report & Written Opinion—PCT/US2018/024903. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,872: Non-Final Office Action (dated Jun. 25, 2019). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/058,658, filed Mar. 3, 2015, Ian G. Horn Zak Alzein Paul Kowalczyk Christophe Romatier, System and Method for Managing Web-Based Refinery Performance Optimization Using Secure Cloud Computing. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/640,120, filed Mar. 30, 2015, Ian G. Horn Zak Alzein Paul Kowalczyk Christophe Romatier, Evaluating Petrochemical Plant Errors to Determine Equipment Changes for Optimized Operations. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/851,207, filed Mar. 27, 2017, Louis A. Lattanzio Alex Green Ian G. Horn Matthew R. Wojtowicz, Operating Slide Valves in Petrochemical Plants or Refineries. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/851,343, filed Dec. 21, 2017, Louis A. Lattanzio Alex Green Ian G. Horn Matthew R. Wojtowicz, Early Prediction and Detection of Slide Valve Sticking in Petrochemical Plants or Refineries. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/851,360, filed Mar. 27, 2017, Louis A. Lattanzio Alex Green Ian G. Horn Matthew R. Wojtowicz, Measuring and Determining Hot Spots in Slide Valves for Petrochemical Plants or Refineries. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/853,689, filed Mar. 30, 2015, Ian G. Horn Zak Alzein Paul Kowalczyk Christophe Romatier, Cleansing System for a Feed Composition Based on Environmental Factors. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/858,767, filed Dec. 28, 2017, Ian G. Horn Zak Alzein Paul Kowalczyk Christophe Romatier, Chemical Refinery Performance Optimization. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/899,967, filed Feb. 20, 2018, Joel Kaye, Developing Linear Process Models Using Reactor Kinetic Equations. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,827, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,847, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,872, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, 3744early Surge Detection of Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,898, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Reactor Loop Fouling Monitor for Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,920, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Sensor Location for Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,935, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Determining Quality of Gas for Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,950, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Determining Quality of Gas for Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/935,957, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Michael R. Van de Cotte Ian G. Horn, Using Molecular Weight and Invariant Mapping to Determine Performance of Rotating Equipment in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,484, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Detecting and Correcting Maldistribution in Heat Exchangers in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,499, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Detecting and Correcting Cross-Leakage in Heat Exchangers in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,517, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Strain Gauges and Detecting Pre-Leakage in Heat Exchangers in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,535, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Detecting and Correcting Thermal Stresses in Heat Exchangers in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,588, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Detecting and Correcting Problems in Liquid Lifting in Heat Exchangers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,602, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,614, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Wet-Cooled Heat Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/937,624, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Sanford A. Victor Phillip F. Daly Ian G. Horn, Heat Exchangers in a Petrochemical Plant or Refinery. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,840, filed Apr. 28, 2017, Ryan McCool Chad E. Bjorklund Jorge Charr Luk Verhulst, Remote Monitoring of Adsorber Process Units. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,974, filed Jun. 20, 2017, Jorge Charr Kevin Carnes Ralph Davis Donald A. Eizenga Christina L. Haasser James W. Harris Raul A. Ohaco Daliah Papoutsis, Incipient Temperature Excursion Mitigation and Control. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,421, filed May 14, 2018, Mahesh K. Gellaboina Louis A. Lattanzio, Catalyst Transfer Pipe Plug Detection. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/007,669, filed Jun. 28, 2017, Yili Shi Daliah Papoutsis Jonathan Andrew Tertel, Process and Apparatus to Detect Mercaptans in a Caustic Stream. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,600, filed Jun. 19, 2017, Theodore Peter Faiella Colin J. Deller Raul A. Ohaco, Remote Monitoring of Fired Heaters. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,614, filed Jun. 19, 2017, Mahesh K. Gellaboina Michael Telly Seth Huber Danielle Schindlbeck, Catalyst Cycle Length Prediction Using Eigen Analysis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,579, filed Jun. 28, 2017, Killol H. Thakkar Robert W. Brafford Eric C. Tompkins, Process and Apparatus for Dosing Nutrients to a Bioreactor. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/133,623, filed Sep. 18, 2017, Chad E. Bjorklund Jeffrey Guenther Stephen Kelley Ryan McCool, Remote Monitoring of Pressure Swing Adsorption Units. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/140,770, filed Oct. 20, 2017, Dinesh Kumar KN Soumendra Mohan Banerjee, System and Method to Optimize Crude Oil Distillation or Other Processing by Inline Analysis of Crude Oil Properties. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/148,763, filed Oct. 2, 2017, Jorge Chan Bryan J. Egolf Dean E. Rende Mary Wier Guy B. Woodle Carol Zhu, Remote Monitoring of Chloride Treaters Using a Process Simulator Based Chloride Distribution Estimate. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,086, filed Oct. 5, 2017, Soumendra Mohan Banerjee Deepak Bisht Priyesh Jayendrakumar Jani Krishna Mani Gautam Pandey, Harnessing Machine Learning & Data Analytics for a Real Time Predictive Model for a Fcc Pre-Treatment Unit. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,138, filed Oct. 8, 2018, Raul A. Ohaco Jorge Charr, High Purity Distillation Process Control With Multivariable and Model Predictive Control (Mpc) and Fast Response Analyzer. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,141, filed Oct. 8, 2018, Ian G. Horn Zak Alzein Paul Kowalczyk Christophe Romatier, System and Method for Improving Performance of a Plant With a Furnace. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/215,101, filed Dec. 10, 2018, Louis A. Lattanzio Christopher Schindlbeck, Delta Temperature Control of Catalytic Dehydrogenation Process Reactors. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/252,021, filed Sep. 16, 2016, Christophe Romatier Zak Alzein Ian G. Horn Paul Kowalczyk David Rondeau, Petrochemical Plant Diagnostic System and Method for Chemical Process Model Analysis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,181, filed Mar. 28, 2017, Ian G. Horn Phillip F. Daly Sanford A. Victor, Detecting and Correcting Vibration in Heat Exchangers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/363,406, filed Mar. 30, 2018, Louis A. Lattanzio Abhishek Pednekar, Catalytic Dehydrogenation Reactor Performance Index. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180283404 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62477876 | Mar 2017 | US |