The present invention relates generally to engine inlet air filters and more particularly to monitoring air flow through inlet barrier filters for turboshaft engines such as used in rotorcraft vehicles to determine when maintenance of the filter is required.
Turboshaft engines are widely used as power plants in all types of vehicles including aircraft, land based vehicles and ships and boats. Such engines may also be used in auxiliary power units and other stationary equipment. One particular aircraft application is to provide power systems for rotorcraft. Turboshaft engines compress inlet air in a compressor, which is then mixed with fuel and ignited to drive a compressor turbine. The heated, expanding air-fuel mixture drives an aerodynamically-coupled “power” turbine that is connected to an output shaft called a power shaft that may be connected through a transmission apparatus to the driven element of a drive train or a propeller. It is a characteristic of turboshaft engines that the power turbine is not mechanically connected to the inlet compressor or compressor turbine. This design allows the compressor and compressor turbine (often called the gas generator) to rotate at different speeds than the power turbine. It also can eliminate the need for transmissions and clutches in some applications, thereby simplifying the drive train of a vehicle.
To prevent damage to the engine, an expensive assembly of substantial precision in its construction, the inlet air admitted to the engine is often filtered to ensure the inlet air is free of debris that could be harmful to the engine. However, as the filter performs its function, to remove debris from the inlet air stream, the filter becomes clogged, which increases the pressure drop across the filter. The increase in pressure drop decreases the available shaft power and increases fuel consumption. In the case of a rotocraft powered by a turboshaft engine, the pressure drop due to filter contamination can cause a reduction in available shaft power—and engine performance—below its rated value as published in the applicable aircraft flight manual, as in “flight manual performance can no longer be achieved.
In a typical example of a prior art rotorcraft, the condition of the engine air inlet barrier filter is subject to inspection based on a message or data displayed by a crew alerting system (CAS) located in the cockpit of the rotorcraft. The CAS may display a message or indicator that maintenance of the inlet barrier filter may be required based on the output of a transducer positioned in the air flow inlet to the engine. The transducer may be a switch that changes state in response to the output of a differential pressure (or, pressure drop, dP) sensor.
While the change of state of the switch can indicate a threshold that may correspond to the need to clean or replace a filter element, the setting of the threshold may be a compromise that is not well-suited to actual operating conditions of the rotorcraft in a given application. For example, setting the threshold at higher levels of differential pressure dP that are equivalent to higher airflows associated with maximum take-off power may not indicate a need for filter maintenance as soon as it is needed based on the actual continuous uses of the rotorcraft. On the other hand, with a fixed threshold responsive to a single change of state of the transducer switch, the CAS may indicate a premature need to service the inlet filter if the threshold is set at too low a level. What is needed is a system for indicating the need for inlet barrier filter maintenance that more closely corresponds with continuous use rather than one example of a peak load use.
In one embodiment an aircraft equipped with a flight control computer system responsive to programmed instructions and powered by at turboshaft engine, an engine inlet barrier filter monitor comprises a differential pressure transducer for measuring differential pressure dPx across the inlet filter during operation of the aircraft to continuously produce an output value in real time; a digitizing mechanism in the flight control system to convert the output value to digital form for storage in a register; a processing algorithm executed in the flight control computer system for calculating a percent restriction of air flow through the inlet filter from the digitized and stored output value as a function of a predicted mass air flow value W1 through the turboshaft engine; and a display interface for converting the percent restriction of air flow to a displayed indication of inlet filter condition (or “health”).
In one aspect, the display interface may comprise a visual indicator driven by a graphics processor and configured to output a percent restriction reading accompanied by a statement “maintenance required” when the indicated percent restriction exceeds a predetermined value.
In another embodiment a method is provided for monitoring restriction in an air inlet filter of a turboshaft engine in an aircraft having a flight control computer system operable according to programmed instructions stored in non-volatile memory, the method comprising the steps of constructing a graphical characteristic curve set of a functional relationship of differential pressure dP as a function of a mass inlet air flow W1 for the turboshaft engine as installed in the aircraft; receiving a real time transducer value dPx from a differential pressure transducer disposed in an inlet air path of the turboshaft engine corresponding to pressure drop across the inlet filter; retrieving operating parameters of the engine stored in the non-volatile memory, the operating parameters including aircraft speed, compressor and power shaft speeds, and ambient pressure and temperature referenced to sea level standard values, which together comprise independent variables for predicting the mass inlet air flow W1 for the turboshaft engine; calculating the mass inlet air flow value W1 from the operating parameters; calculating a percentage restriction of the air inlet filter; and outputting an air inlet filter state to an instrument panel indication corresponding to the percentage restriction.
In one aspect, the graphical characteristic curve set comprises a first curve representing a characteristic for a clean inlet air filter versus the mass air inlet flow (W1) and a second curve representing a characteristic for a maximum allowable restriction of the inlet air filter versus W1.
In another aspect, the step of calculating the percentage restriction comprises the steps of: entering a graphical plot of filter restriction characteristics along an independent variable corresponding to the calculated mass inlet air flow value W1 at a time t1 retrieved from the random access memory; selecting values for dPclean and dPmax where the mass inlet air flow value W1 crosses the filter restriction characteristics; applying an algorithm to the selected values for dPclean and dPmax and the received real time transducer value dPx to determine the percentage restriction at the time t1; and storing the resulting percentage restriction in a register of the flight control computer.
In another aspect, the algorithm comprises a function expressed as R=(dPx−dPclean)/(dPmax−dPclean)×100 where R is the percentage restriction evaluated at a current value W1 of mass air flow at the inlet to the engine at the time t1, dPclean=value of dP for a clean filter at W1, dPmax=value of dP for a clogged filter at W1, and dPx=transducer value of dP at W1; and the current value W1 is determined by the engine thermodynamic model according to values for airspeed, ambient temperature and pressure, and the shaft speeds of a gas generator portion and a power turbine of the engine.
Accordingly, in an advance in the state of the art, the present invention provides a continuous, real-time air inlet barrier filter “health” or condition monitor system and method that operates irrespective of mass air flow into the engine or the power setting of the engine and indicates the percentage amount of restriction of the filter as it becomes clogged during use. An indicator gives the pilot advance warning that the inlet barrier filter is clogged. Instead of merely generating an alarm or message under a single, predetermined condition, the invention is responsive to actual operating conditions because it is based on the relationship that differential pressure dP increases as a function of mass air flow (squared) into the engine. That is, the “health” or condition monitor is sensitive to the component variables of the mass air flow inlet to the engine, which in turn are affected by the varying levels of filter restriction. Thus the filter monitor is responsive to and reflects the effects of atmospheric variables such as temperature and pressure, the airspeed of the rotorcraft, the speeds of the compressor and power turbine shafts, and any impediment offered by restriction of the filter itself.
The following detailed description of the illustrated embodiment depicted in the drawings uses reference numbers to refer to various components of the apparatus, steps of the methods, or aspects of the relationships or parameters involved in describing the invention. Reference numbers that appear in more than one drawing figure refer to the same element, step or aspect. In some cases the units of certain parameters, as used in the aircraft industry, may be denoted by abbreviations such as lbm/sec, which means “pounds mass per second,” a unit for air flow through a defined area, where the lower case m denotes mass (not meters). In another example, the term “dP” stands for “differential pressure” and is expressed herein in pounds-per-square-inch (PSI).
The illustrated embodiment describes the invention as it may be used with a rotorcraft powered by a turboshaft engine. The description illustrates the concepts implemented in the invention but should not be considered as limiting of the scope of the invention. For example, the concept described herein for inlet barrier filters for a turboshaft engine as used in rotorcraft has wide applicability to engines that operate on air and fuel mixtures, wherein the air intake limits the air inlet to the engine to air that has been filtered by a filter element placed in the air inlet path.
For example, the present invention is well-suited for engines that rely on compressed or forced induction of air into the engine air intake where the pressure drop across the inlet filter can impede the performance of the engine. Moreover, vehicles powered by such means that are typically operated under the control of digital or computer systems operable according to programmed instructions implemented in software, for example, and which may include instrument panel apparatus for the display of operational characteristics and data, are well-adapted to the uses of the concepts described herein.
The first section 40 also includes a step 46 describing construction of a graphical plot 90 (see
In a second section 50 of the flow diagram at the left side of
The third section 70 of
R=(dPx−dPclean)/(dPmax−dPclean)×100 in percent (%)
where dPx is the value of dP output from the pressure transducer 30, corrected for SLS (sea level standard values). The values of dPmax, and dPclean are read from the two characteristic curves, respectively dPmax 94 (second curve) and dPclean 92 (first curve), where they are intersected by a vertical line extending upward from the value 106 of W1c provided by the process depicted in the second section of the flow diagram of
The process steps of sections 40, 50 and 70 of the flow diagram in
Continuing with
The foregoing detailed description is shown and described in only one of its forms—with a turboshaft engine for powering a rotorcraft for example—to illustrate the concept of the invention. Persons skilled in the art will understand that this concept is susceptible of various changes and modifications and may be implemented or adapted readily to other types of engines that require air mixed with fuel for operation and provide for filtering the air conducted into the engine. Further, the invention is not limited to use with turboshaft engines or to engines used in rotorcraft. Other types of internal combustion engines and other types of motorized vehicles are suitable candidates for the use of this invention, including engines that operate on compressed air or forced air induction.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5018069 | Pettigrew | May 1991 | A |
7031812 | Pettigrew | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7491253 | Wilson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7591173 | Benscoter | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8292978 | Krahl | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8459038 | Lickfold | Jun 2013 | B1 |
9254921 | Braeutigam | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9574497 | Dailey | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20020016654 | Ing | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020182062 | Scimone | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040217872 | Bhardwaj | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060016196 | Epstein | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20090139200 | Colaprisco | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100065139 | Osswald | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110001003 | Krahl | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054811 | Contini | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238331 | Moore | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130092798 | Boyce | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130115114 | Bryant | May 2013 | A1 |
20130313371 | Lamb, Jr. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130327218 | Izzi | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140077039 | Scimone | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150096627 | Dailey | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150202561 | Morgan | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150330310 | deGaribody | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160055685 | Lilly | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160208716 | Bewick | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160342930 | Tucker | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342956 | Tucker | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170067814 | Steinert | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170211498 | Moore | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170259936 | Schaupmann | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170284927 | Hamann | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287235 | Ozturk | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170306788 | Vega | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180073386 | Zhang | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180202398 | Jammoussi | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180238235 | Dailey | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180297718 | Adibhatla | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305035 | Bergami | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180312270 | Boyce | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180350165 | Moravek | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190112075 | Kalmar | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190146000 | Hurst | May 2019 | A1 |
20190224607 | Bergami | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190309689 | Meisner | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190339688 | Celia | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190359240 | Domingos | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20210147097 | Bigeard | May 2021 | A1 |
20220260031 | Li | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Kim Breitfelder, Don Messina, IEEE 100 The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms , IEEE, 7th Edition (Year: 2000). |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary Fifth Edition 2002 Microsoft Press p. 527 (Year: 2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190390564 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |