Real time notification of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10554426
  • Patent Number
    10,554,426
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 3, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods of real time notification of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment are disclosed. In one aspect, embodiments of the present disclosure include a method, which may be implemented on a system, for selecting a recipient of a notification an activity according to criteria determined based on a workspace in which the activity was performed in the online collaboration platform and/or sending the notification of the activity to the recipient such that the recipient is notified in real time or near real time to when the activity occurred.
Description
BACKGROUND

As electronic or digital content is used in enterprise settings or other organizations as the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management, as has the need and use of streamlined collaboration and editing surrounding digital content and documents.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an example diagram of a system where a host server and a notification server provide notifications of activities that occur in an online collaboration environment in real time or near real time to users.



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting for organizing work items and workspaces.



FIG. 3 depicts an example diagram of a workspace in an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators through various devices.



FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in the host server of a web-based collaboration environment with real time activity notification capabilities.



FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in a notification server for providing real time or near real time notifications of activities that occur in a web-based or online collaboration environment.



FIG. 6 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface for use in accessing and interacting with content or other work items a web-based collaboration environment.



FIG. 7 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface for engaging in discussions surrounding work items with collaborators in real time in an online or web-based collaboration environment.



FIG. 8 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface with a feed stream of real time or near real time notifications of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment.



FIG. 9 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for selecting a recipient to notify of activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment.



FIG. 10 depicts a diagram illustrating examples of criteria used to select notification recipients and the various pathways through which criteria are set.



FIG. 11 depicts a flow chart illustrating another example process for notifying a user in a web-based collaboration environment of an activity performed by another user in a workspace.



FIG. 12 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for presenting notifications in a feed stream among other notifications according to relevancy.



FIG. 13 depicts a diagram illustrating example processes for and parameters used in determining an ordering with which notifications of activity can be presented to a user.



FIG. 14 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.


Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.


The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.


Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.


Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.


Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods real time notification of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example diagram of a system where a host server 100 and a notification server 150 provide notifications of activities that occur in an online collaboration environment in real time or near real time to users 108.


The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or notification server 150. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102 and/or the host server 100 and/or notification server 150.


For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone, a PDA, a Blackberry device, a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, a Galaxy, Xoom Tablet, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console, an iPhone, and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and app server 110 are coupled via a network 106 and/or a network 108. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 may be directly connected to one another.


The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination of the above.


Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100).


The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator user or administrative user, for example.


In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may be different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a work space and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.


In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a work space for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing work space or to a new work space. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a work space.


A diagrammatic illustration of the online collaboration environment and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 2. A diagrammatic illustration of a workspace having multiple work items with which collaborators can access through multiple devices is illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 3.


In one embodiment, actions performed on work items or other activities that occur in a work space can be detected in real time or in near real time. In addition, users, collaborators, or select users can be notified in real time or near real-time of these actions or activities. Various mechanisms can be used to notify users or collaborators, including through the web interface to access the collaboration platform, via email, and/or SMS, for example.


Functions and techniques disclosed for real time or near real time notification of activities that occur in the online platform on a work item or in a work space can be performed by a push-enabled server (e.g., the notification server 150 coupled to the host server 100 of the collaboration platform. Functions and techniques performed by the host server 100, the notification server 150, and the related components therein are described, respectively, in detail with further reference to the examples of FIG. 4-5.


In one embodiment, client devices 102 communicate with the host server 100 and/or notification server 150 over network 106. In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102, the host server 100, and/or notification server 150 communicate, may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.


The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).


In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone Service (D-Amps), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G, 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, 3G LTE, 3GPP LTE, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, UMTS-TDD, 1xRTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks or messaging protocols.



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting 250 for organizing work items 215, 235, 255 and workspaces 205, 225, 245.


The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.


When deployed in a organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associate work items. For example, work space A 205 may be associated with work items 215, work space B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and work space N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 may be unique to each work space but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one work space (e.g., work space A 205) or it may be associated with multiple work spaces (e.g., Work space A 205 and work space B 225, etc.).


In general, each work space has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, work space A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, work spaces deployed in an enterprise may be department specific. For example, work space B may be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.


Each user associated with a work space can generally access the work items associated with the work space. The level of access will depend on permissions associated with the specific work space, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the work space or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a work space (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates work space B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 may also set different permission settings for each work item, which may be the same for different users, or varying for different users.


In each work space A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the work space, other users in the same work space may be notified in real time or in near real time. Activities which trigger real time notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the work space, adding, deleting a work item in the work space, creating a discussion topic in the work space.


The activity can be performed in relation to a discussion topic in the work space, for example, adding a response to a discussion topic, deleting a response, or editing a response in the work space. In addition, the activity is performed on a work item in the work space by the user, including, by way of example but not limitation, download or upload of a work item, deletion of editing of the work item, selecting, adding, deleting, and modifying a tag in the work item, preview of the work item or comment of the work item, setting or changing permissions of the work item, sharing a work item, emailing a link to the work item, and/or embedding a link to the work item on another website. Example user interfaces for accessing the collaborative environment or platform are illustrated with references to the example screenshots of FIG. 6-8.



FIG. 3 depicts an example diagram of a workspace 302 in an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators 322 through various devices.


Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the work space 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user can access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).


Each user can be notified of actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the work space 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time. The notifications can be sent through any of all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform (e.g., as shown in the example screenshot of FIG. 8). In the event of multiple notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit).


For example, a notification can be presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment. Preferential presentation of real time notifications is further described with references to the examples of FIG. 4 and the processes of FIG. 12-13.



FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in the host server 400 of a web-based collaboration environment with real time activity notification capabilities.


The host server 400 of the web-based or online collaboration environment can generally be a cloud-based service. The host server 400 can include, for example, a network interface 402, an activity detector 405, a notification engine 415, a permissions manager 435 and/or a notification prioritizer 455. The notification engine 415 can include a notification server manager 416 and/or a recipient selection module, the permission manager 435 can include a workspace manager 426, a collaboration manager 438, an organization tracker 440 having an enterprise tracker 441, and/or a work item manager 442; the notification prioritizer 455 can further include a rules module 456, a chronological ordering engine 458, and/or a relevance assessor 460. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 400 and each illustrated component.


The network interface 402 can be a networking module that enables the host server 400 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server 400, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface 402 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.,), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.


As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” a “handler,” a “detector,” an “interface,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, hander, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, hander, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. 101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.


One embodiment of the host server 400 includes the activity detector 405 which can detect an activity in the web-based collaboration environment. The activity can be a triggering activity which causes select or relevant users to be notified of the occurrence, which in one embodiment, is in real time or near real-time.


The detected activity can be performed by a user or collaborator in a work space and can be performed on a work item or relating to a work item, for example, download or upload of the work item, previewing, commenting of a work item, deletion or editing of the work item, commenting on a work item, identifying, selecting, adding, deleting, saving, editing, and modifying a tag in the work item, setting or changing permissions of the work item, sharing the work item including, for example, emailing a link to the work item, embedding a link to the work item on another website.


The types of activities that can be detected can also relate to changes to a work space, such as adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the work space; changes to work items such as adding, deleting a work item in the work space; creating a discussion topic in the work space, adding a response to a discussion topic, deleting a response, or editing a response in the work space.


Detected activity in a work space that is performed by a user or otherwise occurring can trigger notifications to be sent out, for example, via the notification engine 415. The notification engine 415 can notify users, which can be collaborators of the user who performed the activity in the work space via one or more of many mechanisms, including but not limited to, email, SMS, voice-message, text-based message, RSS, feed, etc.


In one embodiment, the notification is depicted through a web-browser used by the other user to access the web-based collaboration environment, for access in real time or near real time to when the activity was performed by the user. When notifying a user in real time through a web-browser, the notification engine 415 can utilize a push-enabled service to ensure real time notification. In one embodiment, the notification is sent by a component or another server which implements push technology (e.g., the notification server 500 shown in the example of FIG. 5). The push-enabled service can be implemented via long poll or HTTP streaming, for example, by the notification sever 500 or another component, device which may be internal to or external to the host server 400. In addition, the host server 400 could utilize other push servers including third party push servers to implement push technology including but not limited to mobile platform push systems and services (e.g., via smart phones or tablets or other portable devices such as iPhone, Android phones, Blackberry, iPad, Galaxy or other tablets, etc.).


The host server 400 can send a notification server an identification of the recipient to be notified and indicator of the activity to notify the recipient of. Use of an external push server, such as the notification server 550 is described with further reference to the example of FIG. 5. The notification server 550 can be managed by the notification server manager 416 in the notification engine 415 which can communicate events to notify users in real-time via their browser interfaces. In one embodiment, the host server sends a notification server an identification of the recipient to be notified and indicator of the activity to notify the recipient of.


In general, recipients of an activity notification are selected based on criteria, for example, by the recipient selection module 418 of the notification engine 415. The criteria may be determined, for example, based on a work space in which the activity was performed in the online collaboration platform. Specifically, the criteria, is in one embodiment, determined based on permissions configured for the workspace, as managed, tracked, updated, implemented, revised, based by the permissions manager 435.


For example, the workspace can be associated with an enterprise and in such an instance, the criteria can specify that the recipient that is selected is an employee of the enterprise. Enterprise associations and affiliations can be managed by the organization tracker 440, for example; in some embodiments, enterprises and/or enterprise accounts can specifically be managed, tracked, monitored by the enterprise tracker 441. Permissions for the workspace can configured by a creator or administrative user of the workspace. The collaboration manager 438 can determine, track, and implement relationships, roles, and/or access levels of multiple users/collaborators. For example, users may be a general user, a creator of the work space, a creator of a work item, or an administrative user. The permissions for a work space can be configured by a user, creator, or the administrative user and is generally managed by the collaborations manager 438.


The criteria that are determined by work space permissions can be managed by the work space manager 436 in the permissions manager 435. The recipient selection module 418 can also determine the recipient selection criteria based on user affiliation with the workspace, including, one or more of, member, invited collaborator and collaborator in the workspace. Such user affiliation can be tracked and managed by, for example, the collaboration manger 438 of the permissions manager 435.


In one embodiment, the criteria are determined based on permissions associated with a work item on which the activity was performed in relation to in the workspace. Permissions associated with work items can be managed, tracked, updated, revised, or implemented, in one embodiment, by the work item manager 442. For example, the permissions associated with the work item can be set by, a creator of the work item or an administrative user of the work space. Each work space can include multiple work items where each of multiple work items has individually configurable permissions. The individually configured permissions can be determined by user roles and rights (e.g., as managed by the collaborations manager 438). The work item manager 442 can communicate with the collaboration manager 438 in setting, configuring, or re-configuring permissions associated with work items.


The notification of a triggering activity, can be presented to a selected user in the web-based or online collaboration environment such that the notification is accessible by the user in real time or near real time to when the triggering activity occurred. In one embodiment, the notification is presented via a user interface to the online collaboration platform, for example, when the recipient (e.g., selected recipient) is accessing the workspace (e.g., the same work space in which activity is detected) or when the recipient is accessing a different work space. Specifically, the real time or near real time notification can be presented to the user via the user interface if the user is online (e.g., online or otherwise logged into the web-based or online collaboration environment). Example screenshots of this online environment is illustrated with further references to the examples of FIG. 6-7 and examples of real time notifications are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 8.


The notification engine 415 can determine the channel through which to notify selected users or recipients of activity. The channels that are used can include, indicators via a user interface to the online collaboration environment, SMS, audio message, text-based messages, email, desktop application, RSS, etc. The indicators presented via the user interface (e.g., the user interfaces shown in the example screenshots of FIG. 6-7) can include visual indicators (e.g., pop-up form including text and/or graphics), audio indicators, or any other types detectable by a user.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications in an order based a rule, which may be configurable by the recipient or another user. Such prioritization in presentation can be determined, managed, tracked, implemented, revised, or updated by the notification prioritizer 455, for example. The notification prioritizer 455 can present the notification in the user interface (e.g., as shown in the user interface of FIG. 8) among other notifications in an order based on a rule as determined by the rules module 456, for example.


The rule can indicate user preferences for notifications of activities based on one or more of, a type of activity that occurred and a user related to the activity. For example, a given user may explicitly or implicitly indicate preferences for activities or actions performed by specific other users or collaborators. A user may also indicate explicitly or implicitly preferences for types of activities that they wish to be notified of or not notified of. Users may also indicate that notifications for certain types of activities are to be prioritized other others. For example, a user may indicate that a notification for a ‘comment on’ activity is of a higher priority compared to a ‘edit’ activity.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications based on chronological order, for example as tracked or determined by the chronological ordering engine 458. For example, each notification can be depicted in the user interface based the time ordering when each associated triggering activity occurred. Notification of the most recently occurred activity can be depicted above or below other notifications, or in a location where most easily accessed by the recipient user.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications based on relevance to the recipient, for example, as determined, tracked, monitored, or implemented by the relevance assessor 460. The relevance to the recipient can be represented by, for example, contextual and temporal parameters. For example, contextual parameters provide metrics indicating the recipient's current activity in the online collaboration platform. Current activity can be any activity of the user that occurred within a certain time frame (e.g., within the last minute, within the last 5 minutes, within the last 10 minutes, for example). Activity of the user can include, a document that the user edited, viewed, downloaded, commented on, tagged, or otherwise accessed. Activity of the user can also include activities surrounding a workspace, including creation/modification of a workspace or attributes of a workspace, such as modification of collaborators, permissions, etc.


Temporal parameters can, for example, provide metrics indicating the recipient's activities in the online collaboration platform over a period of time, a frequency with which the recipient has accessed a work item with which the activity relates to, and/or a frequency with which the recipient has accessed the work space in which the activity was performed.


In one embodiment, notification messages can be assigned a priority rating on a scale (e.g., from 0, not important, to 100, very important) calculated depending on how much the recipient user is impacted by the notification. The impact on a user that a notification has can be indicated by, for example: 1) whether user needs to or has the option to respond to the notification? 2) whether the user (or owner) of the content that has been updated? 3) is the user active on the content that has been updated?.


For notifications of user settings, assignment of priority can be based on, for example, any one or any combination of the following: 1) what are the type of events that the user wants to see more? 2) which collaborators that the user wants, likes, needs, or prefers to get the most notification from? Based on these priority ratings, notifications with a priority lower than a threshold (e.g., user-defined minimum threshold and/or system defined threshold) may not be not displayed, or displayed under select circumstances. In some instances, if too many notifications arrive at the same time, those with the highest priority are displayed. In one embodiment, similar notifications can be grouped together and assigned a priority as a group.



FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in a notification server 550 for providing real time or near real time notifications of activities that occur in a web-based or online collaboration environment.


The notification server 550 generally includes, for example, a push server 505, an SMS notifier 515, and/or a priority module 525. In one embodiment, the push server 505 includes a long poll engine 506 and/or an HTTP streaming engine 508. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the notification server 550 and each illustrated component.


As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” a “handler,” a “detector,” an “interface,” a “controller,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, handler, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, handler, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. 101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.


The notification server 550 can support the services of a collaboration platform or environment to provide real time or near real time notifications of activities. In one embodiment, the notification server 550 is integrated within a host server of a collaboration platform (e.g., the host server 100 shown in the example of FIG. 1 or the host server 400 shown in the example of FIG. 4, for example). The notification server 550 may also be externally coupled to the host server (e.g., the host server 100 or 400. In some instances, a portion of the functions implemented and performed by the notification server 550 can be implemented in part or in whole in the host server 100 or 400. For example, some of the components shown to be in the notification server 500 and associated functionalities can in part or in whole reside in the host server 100 or 400.


In one embodiment, the notification server 550 sends a notification of an activity that occurs within a collaboration platform to a recipient. The notification is sent by the server 550 such that the recipient is notified in real time or near real time to when the activity occurred or when the activity was performed. Real time notification can be performed via push technology, for example by the push server 505 through long polls (e.g., via the long poll engine 506) and/or through the HTTP streaming (e.g., via the HTTP streaming engine 506). The notification server 550 can communicate with the host server to determine a recipient to whom to notify. The notification server 550 can also determine the activity to notify the recipient of, for example through communication with the host server.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment. The presentation priority in a user interface in a feed stream can be managed, in whole, or in part, for example, by the priority module 525 using information determined by the notification prioritizer (e.g., notification prioritizer 455 of host server 400 shown in the example of FIG. 4).


In one embodiment, the notification server 550 can send notifications to users via SMS (e.g., through the SMS notifier 515). In this instance, the notification server 500 can be coupled to an SMS center which forwards the SMS text message to a mobile device over a cellular network. The notification can be sent via SMS in real time or near real time, or with a delay.



FIG. 6 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface 600 for use in accessing and interacting with content or other work items a web-based collaboration environment.


In the example of FIG. 6, a work item 602 is depicted in the user interface to the collaboration environment. The user interface 600 also includes a portion 604 identifying collaborators of the work item 602, or collaborators of the folder (e.g., work space) which the work item 602 belongs to. The user interface 600 can include a portion 606 which includes various options for sharing the work item (e.g., file/document 602). In addition, the user interface 600 can include a portion 608 listing or otherwise identifying other work items (e.g., files) in the same folder (e.g., work space).


The collaboration platform/environment generally allows users or collaborators to define or assign tasks for the work item 602. Users or collaborators can comment on a given work item 602, as shown in this example in portion 610. In addition to commenting, users and collaborators can initiate, engage in, dialogues surrounding a work item or file 602, as further illustrated in the example screenshot of FIG. 7.



FIG. 7 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface 700 for engaging in discussions surrounding work items with collaborators in real time in an online or web-based collaboration environment.


Discussion topics can be created by users (e.g., topics/questions 705 and 725) and users/collaborators in the work space. Once a discussion topic is created (e.g., via panel 702), the users/collaborators can provide comments or dialogue surrounding the topic (e.g., through “Enter your comment” field 715 or 735, for example). Commenting and/or dialogue features can also occur surrounding files (e.g., specific work items) or folders (e.g., specified work spaces).


Dialoging and/or commenting activities are some examples of actions or activities which can trigger notifications. For example, when a user comments (e.g., comment 710) on a discussion topic, other users (e.g., other collaborators) may be notified. The users that are notified can be others participating in the dialogue surrounding topic 705 or any or all other users in the work space. Users can be notified immediately (e.g., in real time or near real time) to when a comment or dialogue is sent. The notification can be sent via any mechanism, including but not limited to email, SMS, or through the user interface to the collaboration environment, as further illustrated in the example screenshot of FIG. 8.



FIG. 8 depicts a screenshot showing an example of a user interface 800 with a feed stream 850 of real time or near real time notifications 850 of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment.


The example user interface 800 includes a feed stream 850 (e.g., real time or near real-time notifications) of activities or actions performed in the depicted work space (e.g., comprising of files, folders, discussions, etc.). Notifications for various types of activities can be presented; for example, notification 852 is sent in response to a user uploading files to the work space, notification 854 is triggered by a comment, notification 856 is triggered in response to the download of a file, for example. Notification triggering activities can include additional types of activities surrounding work items and/or work spaces and are not limited to those illustrated in the present example.


The example notifications shown in the example screenshot 800 includes an identification of the user who performed the activity or action, the type of activity, and the work item (e.g., file) on which the action was performed. Note that notifications can include additional or less information, for example, the time/date of the action can be included, the work space (e.g., a folder in which the acted on-file is stored) can be included, additional detail about the action can be included (e.g., an excerpt of an added comment). The amount of information and/or type of information included in a specific notification (e.g., notification 852, 854, or 856) can be configured or reconfigured, or specified by the user. The amount of information can be automatically adjusted by the collaboration platform, for example, based on device characteristics (e.g., screen size) or device/network resource availability.


In one embodiment, notifications are presented in a feed stream among other notifications through according to relevancy to the user, determined for example, based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment



FIG. 9 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for selecting a recipient to notify of activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment.


In process 902, a recipient of a notification of an activity is selected according to criteria. The recipient can be selected, for example, automatically by a web server which hosts the online collaboration environment/platform.


In process 904, the criterion is determined based on a workspace in which the activity was performed in the online collaboration platform, some examples of criterion used to select recipients is illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 10.


In process 906, the notification of the activity is sent to the recipient. In one embodiment, the notification is sent by a server implementing push technology. The server may be a portion of the same web server or another server. The push technology can be implemented using, for example, long polls or HTTP streaming.


In process 908, the notification is presented via a user interface to the online collaboration platform. In process 910, the recipient is notified in real time or near real time to when the activity occurred. For example, the notification is presented in the user interface when the recipient is accessing the same workspace or a different workspace in which the triggering activity was performed.



FIG. 10 depicts a diagram illustrating examples of criteria used to select notification recipients and the various pathways through which criteria are set.


Criteria can be determined, for example, based on user affiliation with a work space 1002 (e.g., a work space in which a notification-triggering activity or action was performed or detected by the system). Types of user affiliations can include, for example, a member, a user, a collaborator, or an invited collaborator. Other types of affiliations can include, creator, administrator, manager, etc.


Criteria can also be determined based on permissions configured for the workspace, as shown in process 1004 and/or based on permissions associated with a work item 1006. Each criterion can be used alone or in combination with any number of others in the process of selecting recipients to notify. In some instances, a work space is associated with an organization such as an enterprise. In this instance the criteria used can include a requirement that the recipient that is selected is an employee of the enterprise, or other organization.



FIG. 11 depicts a flow chart illustrating another example process for notifying a user in a web-based collaboration environment of an activity performed by another user in a workspace.


In process 1102, an activity performed by a user in a workspace is detected in the web-based collaboration environment. In process 1104, a notification of the activity performed by the user to another user, who meets criteria, in the web-based collaboration environment.


In process 1106, the notification is depicted through a web-browser used by the other user to access the web-based collaboration environment. The notification can also be sent to the user via email, SMS, or in an RSS feed, for example. In process 1108, the notification is accessible by the other user in real time or near real time to when the activity was performed by the user.



FIG. 12 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for presenting notifications in a feed stream among other notifications according to relevancy.


In process 1202, a triggering activity is detected in the web-based collaboration environment.


In process 1204, a notification of the triggering activity is provided to a user in the web-based collaboration environment such that the notification is accessible by the user in real time or near real time to when the triggering activity occurred. In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications in an order based on a rule. The rule can specify preferences for notifications of activities based on one or more of, a type of activity and a user related to the activity. In general, the rule is configurable by users, collaborators in a work space, (e.g., any selected recipient). In addition, the notification can be presented in the user interface among other notifications based on relevance to the recipient.


In general relevance to the recipient can be characterized using one or more of, contextual and temporal parameters, examples of which are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 13. In process 1206, current or recent activity of the user is detected in the web-based collaboration environment. In process 1208, relevancy of the triggering activity to the user is determined based on the current or recent activity of the user. In process 1210, the notification is presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface to the web-based collaboration environment according to relevancy.



FIG. 13 depicts a diagram illustrating example processes for and parameters used in determining an ordering with which notifications of activity can be presented to a user.


In process 1302, a rule which specifies preferences for notifications of activities based on: a type of activity and/or a user related to the activity can be used to determine ordering with which to present a notification in a user interface. In process 1304, chronological ordering 1304 can be used to determine ordering with which to present a notification in a user interface.


In process 1306, contextual parameters can be used to characterize relevance to the recipient 1308 in determining the ordering. Contextual parameters can include, for example, the recipient's current activity and/or collaborator's current activities. Temporal parameters can include, for example, recipient's activities over a period of time, frequency with which the recipient has accessed a work item, and/or frequency with which the recipient has accessed the work space. Each process can be used alone or in conjunction with any number of other processes for determining the ordering of placement in the user interface of a notification in feeds.



FIG. 14 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed


In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.


The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.


In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.


Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.


Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.


The network interface device enables the machine 1100 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.


The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.


Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc. without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.


Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.


The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.


The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.


Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.


These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.


While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method of notifying recipient collaborators of activities occurring in an online collaboration platform, the method comprising: selecting, by a processor of a web server hosting the online collaboration platform, a recipient collaborator for notification of an activity occurring on an item in a workspace of the online collaboration platform, wherein the selection is made according to criteria determined based on the workspace in which the activity occurred in the online collaboration platform, and wherein the online collaboration platform is configured to include multiple workspaces, each workspace configured to have multiple items on which activities can be performed by a set of collaborators associated with the workspace;sending the notification of the activity to the recipient collaborator based on a relevance of the notification to the recipient collaborator, wherein the relevance is determined based, at least in part, on a first set of activities performed by the recipient collaborator in the online collaboration platform within a first duration before the activity occurred on the item and a second set of activities performed by the recipient collaborator in a second duration before the activity occurred on the item, the second duration being greater than the first duration; andpresenting the notification via a user interface of the online collaboration platform to the recipient collaborator, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface among multiple notifications in an order, wherein the presenting includes: computing a priority rating of each of the notifications based on a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a type of activity associated with each of the notifications or a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a user related to the activity,selecting the notifications whose priority rating exceeds a specified threshold to generate selected notifications,determining the order of the selected notifications based on the priority rating, andautomatically adjusting, by the online collaboration platform, the amount of information to be displayed in the notification.
  • 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising a notification server implementing a push technology, wherein the notification is sent by the notification server.
  • 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the push technology is implemented using one or more of long polls or HTTP streaming.
  • 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the workspace is associated with an enterprise and the criteria specifies that the recipient collaborator that is selected is an employee of the enterprise.
  • 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein, the criteria is determined based on permissions or roles configured for the workspace.
  • 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the permissions or roles for the workspace are configured by a creator or administrative user of the workspace.
  • 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the criteria is determined based on permissions or roles associated with the item on which the activity occurred.
  • 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the permissions or roles associated with the item are set by, a creator of the item or an administrative user of the workspace.
  • 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the workspace includes multiple items each having individually configurable permissions or roles.
  • 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface to the recipient collaborator when the recipient collaborator accesses one or more of the workspace or a different workspace.
  • 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface among other notifications in an order based on a rule that is configurable by the recipient collaborator.
  • 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface among other notifications based on a chronological order.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the relevance of the notification to the recipient collaborator includes one or more of, contextual and temporal parameters.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the contextual parameters provide metrics indicating the recipient collaborator's current activity in the online collaboration platform.
  • 15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the temporal parameters provide metrics indicating the recipient collaborator's activities in the online collaboration platform over a period of time.
  • 16. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the temporal parameters indicate a frequency with which the recipient collaborator has accessed the item or a frequency with which the recipient collaborator has accessed the workspace in which the activity was performed.
  • 17. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein automatically adjusting the amount of information to be displayed in the notification includes automatically adjusting the amount of information based on characteristics of a computing device on which the notification is presented.
  • 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein automatically adjusting the amount of information to be displayed in the notification includes automatically adjusting the amount of information based on a resource availability in a computing device on which the notification is presented, or a resource availability in of a network using which the online collaboration platform presents the notification to the computing device.
  • 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the type of activity associated with each of the notifications comprises one of adding the item to the workspace, deleting the item from the workspace, modifying the item in the workspace, adding a collaborator to the workspace, deleting a collaborator from the workspace, or modifying a collaborator within the workspace.
  • 20. A computer-implemented method of providing notifications of activities occurring in a web-based collaboration environment, the method, comprising: detecting an activity performed by a user on an item associated with a workspace in the web-based collaboration environment, wherein the web-based collaboration environment is configured to include multiple workspaces each configured to have multiple items on which activities can be performed by a set of users associated with the workspace;providing a notification of the activity performed by the user to another user of the set of users associated with the workspace based on a relevance of the notification to the another user, wherein the relevance is determined based, at least in part, on whether the another user performed a first set of activities on the item in the workspace within a first duration before the activity occurred on the item and a second set of activities on the item within a second duration before the activity occurred on the item, the second duration being greater than the first duration, wherein the another user meets a criteria; andpresenting the notification via a user interface of the web-based collaboration environment to the another user, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface among multiple notifications in an order, wherein the presenting includes: computing a priority rating of each of the notifications based on a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a type of activity associated with each of the notifications or a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a user related to the activity and wherein the type of activity associated with each of the notifications comprises one of adding the item to the workspace, deleting the item from the workspace, modifying the item in the workspace, adding a collaborator to the workspace, deleting a collaborator from the workspace, or modifying a collaborator within the workspace,selecting the notifications whose priority rating exceeds a specified threshold to generate selected notifications,determining the order of the selected notifications based on the priority rating, andautomatically adjusting, by the web-based collaborationenvironment, the amount of information to be displayed in the notification.
  • 21. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein providing the notification comprises depicting the notification through a web accessible application used by the another user to access the web-based collaboration environment.
  • 22. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein providing the notification comprises providing the notification to the another user if the another user is online in the web-based collaboration environment.
  • 23. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein providing the notification comprises sending the notification to the another user via one or more of email, SMS or an RSS feed.
  • 24. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, further comprising deploying the web-based collaboration platform in an enterprise setting wherein the criteria specifies that the another user be an employee of the enterprise in which the web-based collaboration environment is deployed.
  • 25. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes one or more of, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace.
  • 26. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity is performed on the item in the workspace and includes one or more of, adding, deleting, modifying the item in the workspace, downloading or uploading of the item in the workspace, or deletion of editing of the item in the workspace.
  • 27. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes creating a discussion topic in the workspace.
  • 28. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity is performed in relation to a discussion topic in the workspace.
  • 29. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, adding a response to a discussion topic, deleting a response a discussion topic, or editing a response a discussion topic in the workspace.
  • 30. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, identifying, selecting, adding, deleting, and modifying a tag in the item.
  • 31. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, preview of the item or comment of the item.
  • 32. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, setting or changing permissions of the item, sharing the item, or emailing a link to the item.
  • 33. The computer-implemented method of claim 32, wherein the sharing of the item includes, embedding a link to the item on another website.
  • 34. A computer-implemented method of notification of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment, the method, comprising: detecting a triggering activity occurring on an item in a workspace of the web-based collaboration environment;selecting a user for notification of the triggering activity based, at least in part, on the workspace in which the activity occurred, wherein the user is a collaborator in the web-based collaboration environment;providing a notification of the triggering activity to the user in the web-based collaboration environment; andpresenting the notification in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface of the web-based collaboration environment according to a relevancy of the triggering activity to the user as determined based on current or recent activity performed by the user on the item in the workspace within a first duration before the triggering activity occurred on the item and activities performed by the user on the item in a second duration before the triggering activity occurred on the item, the second duration being greater than the first duration, wherein the notification is presented in the feed stream among multiple notifications in an order, wherein the presenting includes: computing a priority rating of each of the notifications based on a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a type of activity associated with each of the notifications or a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a user related to the activity and wherein the type of activity associated with each of the notifications comprises one of adding the item to the workspace, deleting the item from the workspace, modifying the item in the workspace, adding a collaborator to the workspace, deleting a collaborator from the workspace, or modifying a collaborator within the workspace,selecting the notifications whose priority rating exceeds a specified threshold to generate selected notifications,determining the order of the selected notifications based on the priority rating, andautomatically adjusting, by the web-based collaborationenvironment, the amount of information to be displayed in the notification.
  • 35. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, wherein the web-based collaboration environment is used in an enterprise setting and each enterprise is associated with one or more workspaces of the web-based collaboration environment.
  • 36. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, wherein the current or recent activity of the user includes actions on a same item with which the triggering activity the user is being notified of relates to.
  • 37. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, wherein the current or recent activity of the user includes dialogues or comments regarding a same item with which the triggering activity the user is being notified of relates to.
  • 38. A system for notifying a recipient collaborator of activities that occur in an online collaboration platform, the method, comprising: one or more processors; anda memory unit having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to: detect a triggering activity occurring on an item in a workspace of the web-based collaboration environment;select a user for notification of the triggering activity based, at least in part, on the workspace in which the activity occurred, wherein the user is a collaborator in the web-based collaboration environment;provide a notification of the triggering activity to the user in the web-based collaboration environment; andpresent the notification in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface of the web-based collaboration environment according to a relevancy of the triggering activity to the user as determined based on current or recent activity performed by the user on the item in the workspace within a first duration before the triggering activity occurred on the item and activities performed by the user on the item in a second duration before the triggering activity occurred on the item, the second duration being greater than the first duration, wherein the notification is presented in the feed stream among multiple notifications in an order, wherein the presenting includes: computing a priority rating of each of the notifications based on a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a type of activity associated with each of the notifications or a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a user related to the activity and wherein the type of activity associated with each of the notifications comprises one of adding the item to the workspace, deleting the item from the workspace, modifying the item in the workspace, adding a collaborator to the workspace, deleting a collaborator from the workspace, or modifying a collaborator within the workspace,selecting the notifications whose priority rating exceeds a specified threshold to generate selected notifications, anddetermining the order of the selected notifications based on the priority rating, andautomatically adjusting, by the web-based collaboration environment, the amount of information to be displayed in the notification.
  • 39. The system of claim 37, further comprising a notification server that sends the notification using a push technology.
  • 40. A computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by one or more processors of an online collaboration platform, cause the online collaboration platform to: detect an activity performed by a user on an item associated with a workspace in the web-based collaboration environment, wherein the web-based collaboration environment is configured to include multiple workspaces each configured to have multiple items on which activities can be performed by a set of users associated with the workspace;provide a notification of the activity performed by the user to another user of the set of users associated with the workspace based on a relevance of the notification to the another user, wherein the relevance is determined based, at least in part, on whether the another user performed a first set of activities on the item in the workspace within a first duration before the activity occurred on the item and a second set of activities in a second duration before the activity occurred on the item, the second duration being greater than the first duration, wherein the another user meets a criteria; andpresent the notification via a user interface of the online collaboration platform to the another user, wherein the notification is presented via the user interface among multiple notifications in an order, wherein presenting the notification includes: computing a priority rating of each of the notifications based on a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a type of activity associated with each of the notifications or a pre-defined priority rating explicitly assigned by the recipient collaborator to a user related to the activity and wherein the type of activity associated with each of the notifications comprises one of adding the item to the workspace, deleting the item from the workspace, modifying the item in the workspace, adding a collaborator to the workspace, deleting a collaborator from the workspace, or modifying a collaborator within the workspace,selecting the notifications whose priority rating exceeds a specified threshold to generate selected notifications, anddetermining the order of the selected notifications based on thepriority rating, andautomatically adjusting, by the online collaboration platform, the amount of information to be displayed in the notification.
  • 41. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein to provide the notification, the online collaboration platform depicts the notification through a web accessible application used by the another user to access the web-based collaboration environment.
  • 42. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, further comprising: detecting when the another user is online in the web-based collaboration environment, wherein the notification is provided when the another user is online in the web-based collaboration environment.
  • 43. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein to provide the notification, the online collaboration platform sends the notification to the another user via one or more of email, SMS or an RSS feed.
  • 44. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the web-based collaboration platform is configurable for deployment in an enterprise setting, and wherein the criteria specifies that the another user be an employee of the enterprise in which the web-based collaboration environment is deployed.
  • 45. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the activity includes one or more of, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace, downloading or uploading of the item in the workspace, deletion of editing of the item in the workspace, or creating a discussion topic in the workspace.
  • 46. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the activity is performed in relation to a discussion topic in the workspace and includes one or more of adding a response to the discussion topic, deleting a response to the discussion topic, or editing a response to the discussion topic in the workspace.
  • 47. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, identifying, selecting, adding, deleting, and modifying a tag in the item.
  • 48. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, preview of the item or comment of the item.
  • 49. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the activity includes, one or more of, setting or changing permissions of the item, sharing the item, or emailing a link to the item.
  • 50. The computer readable storage medium of claim 40, wherein the sharing of the item includes, embedding a link to the item on another website.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/434,810 entitled “REAL TIME NOTIFICATIONS OF ACTIVITY AND REAL-TIME COLLABORATIONS IN A CLOUD-BASED ENVIRONMENT WITH APPLICATIONS IN ENTERPRISE SETTINGS”, which was filed on Jan. 20, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/445,490 entitled “REAL TIME NOTIFICATIONS OF ACTIVITY AND REAL-TIME COLLABORATION IN A CLOUD-BASED ENVIRONMENT WITH APPLICATIONS IN ENTERPRISE SETTINGS, which was filed on Feb. 22, 2011, the contents of which are all incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (491)
Number Name Date Kind
858619 O'Farrell Jul 1907 A
5748735 Ganesan May 1998 A
5787175 Carter Jul 1998 A
5799320 Klug Aug 1998 A
5848415 Guck Dec 1998 A
5999908 Abelow Dec 1999 A
6016467 Newsted et al. Jan 2000 A
6034621 Kaufman Mar 2000 A
6073161 DeBoskey et al. Jun 2000 A
6098078 Gehani et al. Aug 2000 A
6226618 Downs et al. May 2001 B1
6233600 Salas et al. May 2001 B1
6260040 Kauffman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289345 Yasue Sep 2001 B1
6292803 Richardson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6336124 Alam et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342906 Kumar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345386 Delo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6370543 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B2
6374260 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385606 Inohara et al. May 2002 B2
6396593 Laverty et al. May 2002 B1
6441641 Pang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6515681 Knight Feb 2003 B1
6539381 Prasad et al. Mar 2003 B1
6584466 Serbinis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6636872 Heath et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636897 Sherman et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654737 Nunez Nov 2003 B1
6662186 Esquibel et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687878 Eintracht et al. Feb 2004 B1
6714968 Prust Mar 2004 B1
6735623 Prust May 2004 B1
6742181 Koike et al. May 2004 B1
6760721 Chasen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6947162 Rosenberg et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952724 Prust Oct 2005 B2
6996768 Elo et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003667 Slick et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010752 Ly Mar 2006 B2
7020697 Goodman et al. Mar 2006 B1
7039806 Friedman et al. May 2006 B1
7069393 Miyata et al. Jun 2006 B2
7130831 Howard et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133834 Abelow Nov 2006 B1
7143136 Drenan et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149787 Mutalik et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155483 Friend et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165107 Pouyoul et al. Jan 2007 B2
7178021 Hanna et al. Feb 2007 B1
7222078 Abelow May 2007 B2
7275244 Charles Bell et al. Sep 2007 B1
7296025 Kung et al. Nov 2007 B2
7346778 Guiter et al. Mar 2008 B1
7353252 Yang et al. Apr 2008 B1
7362868 Madoukh et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363330 Ellman et al. Apr 2008 B1
7370269 Prabhu et al. May 2008 B1
7386535 Kalucha et al. Jun 2008 B1
7401117 Dan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7543000 Castro et al. Jun 2009 B2
7581221 Lai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7620565 Abelow Nov 2009 B2
7647559 Yozell-Epstein et al. Jan 2010 B2
7661088 Burke Feb 2010 B2
7665093 Maybee et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676542 Moser et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698363 Dan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7734600 Wise et al. Jun 2010 B1
7756843 Palmer Jul 2010 B1
7774412 Schnepel Aug 2010 B1
7814426 Huesken et al. Oct 2010 B2
7886287 Davda Feb 2011 B1
7886295 Burger et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890964 Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. Feb 2011 B2
7937663 Parker et al. May 2011 B2
7958353 Matsuzaki et al. Jun 2011 B2
7958453 Taing Jun 2011 B1
7979296 Kruse et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996374 Jones et al. Aug 2011 B1
8027976 Ding et al. Sep 2011 B1
RE42904 Stephens, Jr. Nov 2011 E
8065739 Bruening et al. Nov 2011 B1
8090361 Hagan Jan 2012 B2
8117261 Briere et al. Feb 2012 B2
8140513 Ghods et al. Mar 2012 B2
8151183 Chen et al. Apr 2012 B2
8200582 Zhu Jun 2012 B1
8214747 Yankovich et al. Jul 2012 B1
8230348 Peters et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239918 Cohen Aug 2012 B1
8326814 Ghods et al. Dec 2012 B2
8347276 Schadow Jan 2013 B2
8358701 Chou et al. Jan 2013 B2
8370803 Holler et al. Feb 2013 B1
8429540 Yankovich et al. Apr 2013 B1
8464161 Giles et al. Jun 2013 B2
8515902 Savage Aug 2013 B2
8549066 Donahue et al. Oct 2013 B1
8549511 Seki et al. Oct 2013 B2
8582777 Urivskiy et al. Nov 2013 B2
8583619 Ghods et al. Nov 2013 B2
8607306 Bridge et al. Dec 2013 B1
8650498 Mihovilovic Feb 2014 B1
8719445 Ko May 2014 B2
8745267 Luecke et al. Jun 2014 B2
8825597 Houston et al. Sep 2014 B1
8868574 Kiang et al. Oct 2014 B2
8892679 Destagnol et al. Nov 2014 B1
8914856 Velummylum et al. Dec 2014 B1
8914900 Smith et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918387 Sokolov Dec 2014 B1
8949939 Peddada Feb 2015 B2
8959579 Barton et al. Feb 2015 B2
8966062 Giese et al. Feb 2015 B1
8990955 Hymel et al. Mar 2015 B2
20010027492 Gupta Oct 2001 A1
20020029218 Bentley et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020091738 Rohrabaugh et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099772 Deshpande et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116544 Barnard et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133509 Johnston et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020194177 Sherman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030041095 Konda et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030084306 Abburi et al. May 2003 A1
20030093404 Bader et al. May 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110264 Whidby et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115326 Verma et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135536 Lyons Jul 2003 A1
20030135565 Estrada Jul 2003 A1
20030154306 Perry Aug 2003 A1
20030204490 Kasriel Oct 2003 A1
20030217171 Von Stuermer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228015 Futa et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003352 Bargeron Jan 2004 A1
20040021686 Barberis Feb 2004 A1
20040068481 Seshadri Apr 2004 A1
20040088647 Miller et al. May 2004 A1
20040098361 Peng May 2004 A1
20040111415 Scardino et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117438 Considine et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122949 Zmudzinski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128359 Horvitz Jul 2004 A1
20040177138 Salle et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181579 Huck et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196307 Zak et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040201604 Kraenzel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218214 Kihara et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230624 Frolund et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246532 Inada Dec 2004 A1
20040267836 Armangau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005276 Morgan Jan 2005 A1
20050010860 Weiss et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028006 Leser et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038997 Kojima et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050228 Perham et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063083 Dart et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050097225 Glatt et al. May 2005 A1
20050102328 Ring et al. May 2005 A1
20050108406 Lee et al. May 2005 A1
20050114305 Haynes et al. May 2005 A1
20050114378 Ellen et al. May 2005 A1
20050138118 Banatwala et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050182966 Pham et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198299 Beck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198452 Watanabe Sep 2005 A1
20050234864 Shapiro Oct 2005 A1
20050234943 Clarke Oct 2005 A1
20060005163 Huesken et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026502 Dutta Feb 2006 A1
20060036568 Moore et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041603 Paterson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041752 Tuvell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047804 Fredricksen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053088 Ali et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053380 Spataro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070083 Brunswig et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075071 Gillette Apr 2006 A1
20060117247 Fite et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123062 Bobbitt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060164324 Polivy Jul 2006 A1
20060168550 Muller et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060174051 Lordi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060174054 Matsuki Aug 2006 A1
20060179070 George et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179309 Cross et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060242204 Karas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242206 Brezak et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259524 Horton Nov 2006 A1
20060265719 Astl et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271510 Haiward et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060288043 Novak et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070002736 Gade Jan 2007 A1
20070016680 Burd et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070067349 Jhaveri et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070079242 Jolley et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100830 Beedubail et al. May 2007 A1
20070115845 Hochwarth et al. May 2007 A1
20070118598 Bedi et al. May 2007 A1
20070124460 McMullen et al. May 2007 A1
20070124737 Wensley et al. May 2007 A1
20070124781 Casey et al. May 2007 A1
20070126635 Houri Jun 2007 A1
20070130143 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070130163 Perez et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150299 Flory Jun 2007 A1
20070162610 Un et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198609 Black et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208878 Barnes-Leon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214180 Crawford Sep 2007 A1
20070220016 Estrada et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220590 Rasmussen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070240057 Satterfield et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070256065 Heishi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282848 Kiilerich et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283443 McPherson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288290 Motoyama et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005195 Li Jan 2008 A1
20080021959 Naghi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028323 Rosen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040173 Aleong et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040503 Kleks et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046828 Bibliowicz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059656 Saliba et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080063210 Goodman et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065881 Dawson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077631 Petri Mar 2008 A1
20080091763 Devonshire et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091790 Beck Apr 2008 A1
20080104277 Tian May 2008 A1
20080114720 Smith et al. May 2008 A1
20080133674 Knauerhase et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140732 Wilson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147790 Malaney et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151817 Fitchett et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080182628 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183467 Yuan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194239 Hagan Aug 2008 A1
20080215883 Fok et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222654 Xu et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243855 Prahlad et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080250333 Reeves et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263099 Brady-Kalnay et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271095 Shafton Oct 2008 A1
20080276158 Lim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294899 Gazzetta et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080320025 Ozzie Dec 2008 A1
20090015864 Hasegawa Jan 2009 A1
20090019093 Brodersen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019426 Baeumer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030710 Levine Jan 2009 A1
20090043848 Kordun Feb 2009 A1
20090044128 Baumgarten et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049131 Lyle et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090119322 Mills et al. May 2009 A1
20090125469 McDonald et al. May 2009 A1
20090132651 Roger et al. May 2009 A1
20090138808 Moromisato et al. May 2009 A1
20090150417 Ghods et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158142 Arthursson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164438 Delacruz Jun 2009 A1
20090171873 Dolin Jul 2009 A1
20090177754 Brezina et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193107 Srinivasan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193345 Wensley et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198772 Kim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210459 Nair et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210497 Callanan Aug 2009 A1
20090214115 Kimura et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090235167 Boyer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235181 Saliba et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235189 Aybes et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090249224 Davis et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254589 Nair et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260060 Smith et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265430 Bechtel et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271708 Peters et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276771 Nickolov et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282212 Peterson Nov 2009 A1
20090282483 Bennett Nov 2009 A1
20090300356 Crandell Dec 2009 A1
20090300527 Malcolm et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090320035 Ahlgren Dec 2009 A1
20090327358 Lukiyanov et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327405 FitzGerald et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327961 De Vorchik et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100011292 Marinkovich et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011447 Jothimani Jan 2010 A1
20100017262 Iyer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017619 Errico Jan 2010 A1
20100036929 Scherpa et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042720 Stienhans et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057560 Skudlark et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057785 Khosravy et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076946 Barker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082634 Leban Apr 2010 A1
20100083136 Komine et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088150 Mazhar et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092126 Kaliszek et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100093310 Gbadegesin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107225 Spencer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100131868 Chawla et al. May 2010 A1
20100151431 Miller Jun 2010 A1
20100162365 Del Real Jun 2010 A1
20100162374 Nair Jun 2010 A1
20100185463 Noland et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191689 Cortes et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198783 Wang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198871 Stiegler et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198944 Ho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205537 Knighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100218237 Ferris et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100223378 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100229085 Nelson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235526 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235539 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241611 Zuber Sep 2010 A1
20100241972 Spataro et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250120 Waupotitsch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251340 Martin et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100257457 De Goes Oct 2010 A1
20100262582 Garcia-Ascanio et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100267588 Nelson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274765 Murphy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274772 Samuels Oct 2010 A1
20100281118 Donahue et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290623 Banks et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306379 Ferris Dec 2010 A1
20100322252 Suganthi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325155 Skinner et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325655 Perez Dec 2010 A1
20100332401 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100333116 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001763 Murakami Jan 2011 A1
20110016409 Grosz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022559 Andersen et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029883 Lussier et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040812 Phillips Feb 2011 A1
20110041083 Gabai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047413 McGill et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052155 Desmarais et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054968 Galaviz Mar 2011 A1
20110055299 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110055721 Jain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110061045 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110061046 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110065082 Gal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066951 Ward-Karet et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093567 Jeon et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099006 Sundararaman et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110107088 Eng et al. May 2011 A1
20110107205 Chow et al. May 2011 A1
20110119313 Sung et al. May 2011 A1
20110125847 Cocheu et al. May 2011 A1
20110131299 Sardary Jun 2011 A1
20110137991 Russell Jun 2011 A1
20110142410 Ishii Jun 2011 A1
20110145589 Camenisch et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145744 Haynes et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154180 Evanitsky et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161289 Pei et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167125 Achlioptas Jul 2011 A1
20110167353 Grosz et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110185292 Chawla et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202424 Chun et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202599 Yuan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209064 Jorgensen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110219419 Reisman Sep 2011 A1
20110225417 Maharajh et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238458 Purcell et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238621 Agrawal Sep 2011 A1
20110239135 Spataro et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246294 Robb et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246950 Luna et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252320 Arrasvuori et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252339 Lemonik et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258461 Bates Oct 2011 A1
20110258561 Ladouceur et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110277027 Hayton et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289433 Whalin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110313803 Friend et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320197 Conejero et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036370 Lim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057696 Chew Mar 2012 A1
20120064879 Panei Mar 2012 A1
20120072436 Pierre et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120079095 Evans et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120092055 Peschke et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120096521 Peddada Apr 2012 A1
20120110436 Adler, III et al. May 2012 A1
20120110443 Lemonik et al. May 2012 A1
20120117626 Yates et al. May 2012 A1
20120124306 Abercrombie et al. May 2012 A1
20120124547 Halbedel May 2012 A1
20120130900 Tang et al. May 2012 A1
20120134491 Liu May 2012 A1
20120136936 Quintuna May 2012 A1
20120149342 Cohen Jun 2012 A1
20120150888 Hyatt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120151551 Readshaw et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158908 Luna et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159178 Lin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159310 Chang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120166516 Simmons et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173612 Vegesna-Venkata et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120173625 Berger Jul 2012 A1
20120179981 Whalin et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185355 Kilroy Jul 2012 A1
20120192055 Antebi et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192086 Ghods et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203670 Piersol Aug 2012 A1
20120204032 Wilkins et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120214444 McBride et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218885 Abel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221789 Felter Aug 2012 A1
20120224691 Purohit Sep 2012 A1
20120226767 Luna et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233155 Gallmeier et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233205 McDermott Sep 2012 A1
20120233543 Vagell et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240061 Hillenius et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240183 Sinha Sep 2012 A1
20120259964 Lin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120266203 Elhadad et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120284290 Keebler et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284638 Cutler et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284664 Zhao Nov 2012 A1
20120296790 Robb Nov 2012 A1
20120309540 Holme et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120311157 Erickson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317239 Mulder et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317487 Lieb et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328259 Seibert, Jr. et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120331177 Jensen Dec 2012 A1
20120331441 Adamson Dec 2012 A1
20130007245 Malik et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007471 Grab et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007894 Dang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013560 Goldberg et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130014023 Lee et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130042106 Persaud et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130055127 Saito et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067232 Cheung et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130073403 Tuchman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080919 Kiang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130110565 Means, Jr. et al. May 2013 A1
20130117337 Dunham May 2013 A1
20130117376 Filman et al. May 2013 A1
20130124638 Barreto et al. May 2013 A1
20130124984 Kuspa May 2013 A1
20130138608 Smith May 2013 A1
20130138615 Gupta et al. May 2013 A1
20130159411 Bowen Jun 2013 A1
20130163289 Kim et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130167253 Seleznev et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185347 Romano Jul 2013 A1
20130185558 Seibert et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130191339 Haden et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130198600 Lockhart et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212067 Piasecki et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212486 Joshi et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218978 Weinstein et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130239049 Perrodin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130246901 Massand Sep 2013 A1
20130246932 Zaveri et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130262210 Savage et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262862 Hartley Oct 2013 A1
20130268480 Dorman Oct 2013 A1
20130268491 Chung et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275398 Dorman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275429 York et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275509 Micucci et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130282830 Besen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130305039 Gauda Nov 2013 A1
20130326344 Masselle et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140007205 Oikonomou Jan 2014 A1
20140032489 Hebbar et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140033277 Xiao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140033291 Liu Jan 2014 A1
20140052939 Tseng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059217 Pizurica Feb 2014 A1
20140068589 Barak Mar 2014 A1
20140074629 Rathod Mar 2014 A1
20140150023 Gudorf et al. May 2014 A1
20140156373 Roberts et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172595 Beddow et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140344456 Buzbee et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140359286 Wen et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150019723 Kweon et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (42)
Number Date Country
2724521 Nov 2009 CA
101997924 Mar 2011 CN
102264063 Nov 2011 CN
0348614 Jan 1990 EP
0921661 Jun 1999 EP
1349088 Oct 2003 EP
1528746 May 2005 EP
1933242 Jun 2008 EP
2372574 Oct 2011 EP
2610776 Jul 2013 EP
2453924 Apr 2009 GB
2471282 Dec 2010 GB
09-101937 Apr 1997 JP
11-025059 Jan 1999 JP
2003273912 Sep 2003 JP
2004310272 Nov 2004 JP
09-269925 Oct 2007 JP
2008250944 Oct 2008 JP
20020017444 Mar 2002 KR
20040028036 Apr 2004 KR
20050017674 Feb 2005 KR
20060070306 Jun 2006 KR
20060114871 Nov 2006 KR
20070043353 Apr 2007 KR
20070100477 Oct 2007 KR
20100118836 Nov 2010 KR
20110074096 Jun 2011 KR
20110076831 Jul 2011 KR
WO-0007104 Feb 2000 WO
WO-2002019128 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2004097681 Nov 2004 WO
WO-2006028850 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2007024438 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007035637 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2008011142 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008076520 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2011109416 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2012167272 Dec 2012 WO
WO-2013009328 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013013217 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013041763 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013166520 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (125)
Entry
“Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple”, Apr. 1, 2011, [retrieved on May 17, 2015], https://web.archive.org/web/20110401231335/http://www.agilewords.com/product/features, 2 pages.
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6.
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48.
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 24, 2013, 10 pages.
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 7, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated May 31, 2013, 10 pages.
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages.
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the Internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages.
“Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages.
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages.
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages.
Delendik, “My PDF.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages.
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages.
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 26, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages.
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 5 pages.
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages.
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages.
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 8, 2014, 7 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages.
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages.
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page.
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated May 31, 2013, 8 pages.
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages.
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 dated Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13.
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1- 2.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 dated Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12.
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,090, filed Feb. 17, 2011, Ghods et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/165,725, filed Jun. 21, 2011, Trombley-Shapiro et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/166,733, filed Jun. 22, 2011, Seibert et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/208,615, filed Aug. 12, 2011, Lee et al.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-3.
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5.
Written Opinion PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-4.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 dated Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10.
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 Raw file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pp.
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pp.
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90.
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pp.
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums - View topic - Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pp.
Search Report for Ep 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pp.
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pp.
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pp.
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages.
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 28, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages.
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; dated Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages.
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages.
Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20.
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6.
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16.
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages.
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages.
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages.
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page.
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages.
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages.
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages.
“QuickOffice,” Wikipedia Article (old revision), published May 9, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages.
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages.
Google Docs, http://web.Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 19, 2015, 6 pages.
“Agilewords—How to Request Approval,” YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Ov3DYNN3Q, Jan. 31, 2011, 2 pages.
“Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple,” Jun. 1, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20110601223756/http://agilewords.com/product/features, 3 pages.
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 42 pages.
Exam Report for EP 13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2015, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312264.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jan. 30, 2015, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 10, 2015, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316685.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 17, 2015, 5 pages.
Exam Report for EP 13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Feb. 13, 2015, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages.
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages.
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages.
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. dated Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages.
User's Guide for Smart Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages.
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Mar. 27, 2015, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311459.0, Applicant: Box, Inc., dated Aug. 19, 2013, 6 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/434,810, filed Jan. 20, 2011 Real Time Notifications of Activity and Real-Time Collaboration in a Cloud-Based Environment With Applications in Enterprise Settings.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,439, filed Sep. 14, 2012 Batching Notifications of Activities That Occur in a Web-Based Collaboration Environment.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120192086 A1 Jul 2012 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61445490 Feb 2011 US
61434810 Jan 2011 US