This application claims priority to UK Patent Application No. GB 1412932.4, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
One practice which may be employed when drilling a borehole is to enlarge a hole with a reamer. A reamer may be constructed to have a fixed diameter, in which case the reamer must start cutting at the surface or at the end of an existing hole of equal or greater size. Alternatively a reamer can be constructed so as to be expandable so that it can enlarge a borehole to a greater diameter than that of the hole through which the (unexpanded) reamer was inserted.
Enlarging a borehole with a reamer may be done as a separate operation to enlarge an existing borehole drilled at an earlier time. Enlarging with a reamer may also be done at the same time as using a bottom hole assembly which has a drill bit at its bottom end. The drill bit makes an initial hole, sometimes referred to as pilot hole, and a reamer positioned at some distance above the drill bit increases the hole diameter.
There is more than one type of reaming tool. Some reamers are constructed to be eccentric, relative to the drill string to which they are attached and the borehole which they are enlarging. Other reamers are constructed to remain concentric with the drill string and the borehole. These different types of reamers tend to be used in different circumstances. There are many instances where concentric reamers are the appropriate choice.
A reamer may have a plurality of cutter assemblies, each comprising a support structure with attached cutters, arranged azimuthally around the axis of the tool. In the case of an expandable reaming tool it is common to have a plurality of radially expandable support elements bearing cutters positioned around the axis of the tool. Often the tool has three such cutter assemblies which extend axially and are arranged at 120° intervals azimuthally around the tool axis. A mechanism is provided for expanding these cutter assemblies radially outwardly from the axis and this mechanism typically uses hydraulic pressure to force the support structures of the cutter assemblies outwardly.
This tool construction has commonly been used for concentric reamers. In some constructions, each of the individual cutter assemblies arranged around the tool axis is an assembly of parts attached together so as to move bodily as one piece, in which case the assembly is often referred to as a “block” (one part of this assembly may be a shaped monolithic block) although the term “arm” has also been used for such an assembly. The individual cutter assemblies (i.e. individual blocks) may be moved outwards in unison by one drive mechanism acting on them all, or may be moved outwards by drive mechanism(s) which does not constrain them to move in unison.
Cutters attached to the supporting structure may be hard faced and may be PDC cutters having body with a polycrystalline diamond section at one end. The body may be moulded from hard material such as tungsten carbide particles infiltrated with metallic binder. The polycrystalline diamond section which provides the cutting part may then comprise particles of diamond and a binder. In many instances, the polycrystalline diamond section is a disc so that the hardest end of a cutter is a flat surface but other shapes can also be used.
Cutters are customarily positioned so that they are partially embedded in the support structure and project radially outwardly from the support structure with their hard cutting surfaces facing in the direction of rotation. The parts of the cutter which project outwardly beyond the support structure are the parts of the cutter involved in cutting as the rotating reamer is advanced and/or as an expandable reamer is expanded.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below. This summary is not intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the subject matter claimed.
In one aspect, the subject matter disclosed here provides a reaming tool for enlarging an underground borehole, comprising a plurality of cutter assemblies distributed azimuthally around a longitudinal axis of the tool, wherein each cutter assembly comprises support structure bearing a sequence of cutters which have hard surfaces facing in a direction of rotation of the tool and the radially outer surface of each cutter assembly includes zones facing towards the end of the tool.
Such zones may be zones of the outer surface of the support structure. Such a zone may be located between a pair of adjacent cutters which are at different axial distances from an end of the cutter assembly and different radial distances from the tool axis. Such zones may be curved surfaces and facing in directions which extend generally towards the end of the tool without being parallel to the tool axis. Thus each zone may be an area of the outer surface of the cutter assembly within which all notional lines normal (i.e. perpendicular) to the zone surface are at no more than 45° to the tool axis. Each cutter assembly may have at least two, at least three or possibly more such zones.
In accordance with one aspect of the subject matter disclosed here, such a zone is configured such that as it extends circumferentially relative to the tool axis in the direction opposite to rotation of the tool, it also extends away from an end of the assembly. It may extend away from an end of the assembly with an angle between the zone and the tool axis which is not more than 95°.
Configuration and positioning of such zones may be such that on cutter assemblies which follow one another in succession during rotation of the tool, corresponding zone are at increasing distances from the end of the tool. In some embodiments, there may be at least three cutter assemblies distributed azimuthally around a longitudinal axis of the tool and a configuration of supporting structure bearing a plurality of cutters and comprising one or more such zones appearing on a first of the cutter assemblies may then be repeated on the following cutter assembly at greater distance from the end of the assembly and greater radial distance from the tool axis and repeated again on the third cutter assembly at even greater distance from the end of the assembly and even greater radial distance from the tool axis.
One possible arrangement is that the zones lie on a helix around the axis of the tool. The helix may possibly have an angle of no more than 5° and/or be such that the spacing between adjacent turns of the helix is between 3 mm and 10 mm. This may be a helix of progressively increasing diameter.
When a configuration of supporting structure and cutters is reproduced on a plurality of cutter assemblies in a helical arrangement, cutters may lie on a helix similarly to the forwardly facing surface zones.
The inventors have recognised that surfaces which face axially or somewhat axially towards the end of the tool have the potential to be problematic because they could impede axial advance of the tool but they can also be advantageous because they can provide axially facing stabilising surfaces in contact with the rock, which can stabilise the positioning of the tool within the borehole. Arranging such surfaces to slant away from an end of the assembly as they extend circumferentially back from the faces of cutters (or more generally extend circumferentially in a direction opposite to tool rotation) will permit axial advance of the tool. It may also place a limit on the rate of advance. The inventors have found that this is not a problem, because the rate of advance can be at least as good as a rate achieved with conventional cutter assemblies. Moreover, control or limitation of the rate of axial advance may assist multiple cutters on a tool to cut rock in a controlled manner, with the cutting action shared by the cutters rather than throwing the majority of the burden onto a small number of the cutters. This may improve the distribution of reaction forces exerted by the rock on the cutters, reducing cutter damage and/or vibration. It may also offer an advantage if the formation which is being cut has variable resistance to being removed, in that if is no limitation on the speed of advance, energy which has become stored in the drill string can be released as an abrupt jerk forward, adding to vibration.
Cutters used in accordance with the concepts disclosed above may have hard surfaces exposed as the leading faces of the cutters. These hard surfaces may be planar but other shapes, such as a domed or conical shape, are possible. Hard surfaced cutters may be polycrystalline diamond (PDC) cutters which have diamond crystals embedded in a binder material providing a hard face at one end of a cutter body. The radially outer extremity of a cutter may be located at a point at which the circular or other shape of the exposed leading face reaches its maximum distance from the tool axis. However, another possibility is that the cutter is shaped and positioned so that its outer extremity is not a point but is a linear edge parallel to the tool axis or an approximately planar face extending back from such an edge.
In further aspects, this disclosure includes methods of enlarging a borehole by rotating a reaming tool as stated above in the borehole and advancing the tool axially. The method may include expanding a reaming tool which has expandable cutter assemblies and then rotating the tool while also advancing the expanded tool axially.
The drilling rig is provided with a system 128 for pumping drilling fluid from a supply 130 down the drill string 112 to the reamer 122 and the drill bit 120. Some of this drilling fluid flows through passages in the reamer 122 and flows back up the annulus around the drill string 112 to the surface. The rest of the drilling fluid flows out through passages in the drill bit 120 and also flows back up the annulus around the drill string 112 to the surface. The distance between the reamer 122 and the drill bit 120 at the foot of the bottom hole assembly is fixed so that the pilot hole 124 and the enlarged borehole 126 are extended downwardly simultaneously.
As shown in
Referring now to
Each recess 516 accommodates a cutter support element 140 in its collapsed position. This support element has the general form of a block to which cutters are attached. One such cutting block 140 is shown in perspective in
A spring 540 biases the block 140 downwards to the collapsed position of
Below the moveable blocks 140, a drive ring 570 is provided that includes one or more nozzles 575. An actuating piston 530 that forms a piston cavity 535 is attached to the drive ring 570. The piston 530 is able to move axially within the tool. An inner mandrel 560 is the innermost component within the tool 500, and it slidingly engages a lower retainer 590 at 592. The lower retainer 590 includes ports 595 that allow drilling fluid to flow from the flowbore 508 into the piston chamber 535 to actuate the piston 530.
The piston 530 sealingly engages the inner mandrel 560 at 566, and sealingly engages the body 510 at 534. A lower cap 580 provides a stop for the downward axial movement of piston 530. This cap 580 is threadedly connected to the body 510 and to the lower retainer 590 at 582, 584, respectively. Sealing engagement is provided at 586 between the lower cap 580 and the body 510.
A threaded connection is provided at 556 between the upper cap 555 and the inner mandrel 560 and at 558 between the upper cap 555 and body 510. The upper cap 555 sealingly engages the body 510 at 505, and sealingly engages the inner mandrel 560 at 562 and 564.
In operation, drilling fluid flows along path 605, through ports 595 in the lower retainer 590 and along path 610 into the piston chamber 535. The differential pressure between the fluid in the flowbore 508 and the fluid in the borehole annulus surrounding tool 500 causes the piston 530 to move axially upwardly from the position shown in
The movement of the blocks 140 is eventually limited by contact with the spring retainer 550. When the spring 540 is fully compressed against the retainer 550, it acts as a stop and the blocks can travel no further. There is provision for adjustment of the maximum travel of the blocks 140. The spring retainer 550 connects to the body 510 via a screwthread at 551. A wrench slot 554 is provided between the upper cap 555 and the spring retainer 550, which provides room for a wrench to be inserted to adjust the position of the screwthreaded spring retainer 550 in the body 510. This allows the maximum expanded diameter of the reamer to be set at the surface. The upper cap 555 is also a screwthreaded component and it is used to lock the spring retainer 550 once it has been positioned.
As shown in
The outer part 146 of the block 140 has upper and lower cutting portions 160, 162 on which PDC cutters are arranged in a leading row of cutters 164 and a following row of cutters 166. It will be appreciated that the upper and lower cutting portions 160, 162 are inclined (they are curved as shown) so that the cutters in these regions extend outwards from the tool axis by amounts which are least at the top and bottom ends of the block 140 and greatest adjacent the middle section 168 which includes stabilising pad 170.
When a reamer is advanced downwardly within a hole to enlarge the hole, it is the curved lower cutting portions 162 which do the work of cutting through formation rock. This takes place in
The stabilising pad 170 does not include cutters but has a generally smooth, part-cylindrical outward surface positioned to face and slide over the borehole wall. To increase resistance to wear, the stabilising pad 170 may have pieces 172 of harder material embedded in it and lying flush with the outward facing surface.
The reamer as described above, referring to
As with the conventional construction, the outer part of each cutter block is a steel support structure for PDC cutters.
A row of PDC cutters 211-216 is positioned with the hard surfaces of the cutters exposed within the slanted area 204 of the leading face of the block. The cutters are fitted into sockets in the steel supporting structure and secured by brazing so that they are embedded in the supporting structure. The cutters 211-215 are positioned at progressively increasing radial distances from the tool axis. The next cutter 216 is at the same radial distance from the tool axis as cutter 215.
These cutters 211-216 arranged in a single sequence are the only cutters on the lower portion of the cutter block. In contrast with
This length 203 of the block with the slanted area 204 and cutters 211-216 adjoins a length 205 which does not include cutters and provides a stabilising pad with a part-cylindrical outward facing surface 220 which includes a leading region 221 which extends forwardly (in the direction of rotation) of the cutter 216. The leading side surface 200 of the block extends outwards to meet the region 221 of surface 220 at an edge 222 with the consequence that there is a surface 224 facing axially at one end of the slanted area 204. As best seen in the cross-section which is
The outer surface 220 of the stabilising pad is at the full gauge of the reamer and so when the cutter blocks are fully expanded, the outer surface 220 is part of a cylinder which is centred on the tool axis and lies on the notional surface swept out by the rotating tool. The outer extremities of the cutters 215 and 216 are also at the full gauge of the reamer and also lie on this notional surface. This notional surface is akin to a surface of revolution, because it is the surface swept out by a rotating body, but of course the reamer may be advancing axially as it rotates.
The outer surface 220 extends axially over the cutter 216 and over half of cutter 215. Thus, as shown by the cross-section in
The shape of the block inhibits any pivoting around the extremities of cutters during rotation. If the extremity 218 snags on the borehole wall, any pivoting around the extremity 218 in the sense seen as clockwise and denoted by arrow 182 in
The cutters 211-214 are embedded in the outer part of the block in a manner similar to the cutters 215, 216. The outer face of the block includes part-cylindrical surfaces 231-234 which extend behind the leading faces of cutters 211-214 respectively and which are aligned radially with the extremities of the respective cutters. Each of the part-cylindrical surfaces 231-234 has a radius which lies on the tool axis when the cutter blocks are fully expanded.
These surfaces 231-234 act as secondary gauge areas: the surface 231 slides over rock which has just been cut by the action of cutter 211, surface 232 slides over rock cut by cutter 232 and so on. Of course, the rock surfaces created by cutters 211-214 have only a transient existence. They are cut away by cutters at a greater radius as the reamer advances. Nevertheless, this provision of secondary gauge areas contributes to stabilisation of the position of the rotating reamer.
The outer face of the block includes portions connecting the part cylindrical surfaces 231-234. Referring to
These connecting portions of the outer face of the block have zones, such as between the chain lines 248, which face in a generally axial direction and so face towards formation rock which is to be cut away as the reamer advances axially. In order that contact between these zones and the rock does not prevent axial advance of the reamer, these zones are configured in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure and is illustrated by
On each of the three cutter blocks of the reamer, the zones of the outer face which face axially forwards are not positioned exactly orthogonal to the reamer axis. Instead, they are shaped and oriented so that they extend away from the axial end 202 of the reamer as they extend back from the leading faces of the cutters. Secondly the three cutter blocks of the reamer are not identical. They have similar appearance but differ in dimensions.
By way of illustration, a reamer with an expanded diameter of 150 mm may have angle of slightly less than 1 degree between the lines 250 and 249 and advance by 6 mm in each revolution. The axial spacing between the cutters may then be approximately equal to this distance of 6 mm. A reamer may have a diameter larger than 150 mm, for instance up to 600 mm or even more with the same designed rate of advance of 6 mm.
The radial positions of the cutters 211-213 relative to each other is the same on all three cutter blocks, but the cutters 211-213 on block 252 are positioned radially slightly further from the axis of the tool than the corresponding cutters of block 251. Similarly the cutters 211-213 of block 253 are positioned slightly further from the axis of the tool than the corresponding cutters 211-213 of block 252. Thus the cutters 211-213 and the support structure around them has a configuration in which both axial and radial positions are the same, relative to each other, on all three cutter blocks, but this configuration of cutters and associated support structure is positioned slightly differently both axially relative to the ends of the blocks and radially relative to the tool axis. The cutters 214 are at progressively increasing radial distances from the tool axis on the blocks 251, 252 and 253, but for these cutters 214 the increase in distance is smaller than in the case of the cutters 211-213. The support structure around blocks 214-216 is similar in shape and appearance on all three cutter blocks but the cutters 215 and 216 are all at the same radial distance from the tool axis.
The tapering of the axially facing surface zones as described with reference to
This is illustrated by
With this arrangement of the axially facing surface zones on a helix, the axially facing zones will not impede axial advance of the tool if it rotates, so long as the amount of advance in one revolution does not exceed the distance between turns of the helix, which may be in the range of 3 to 10 mm and in some embodiments is 6 mm. When the amount of advance in a revolution reaches the distance between turns of the helix, each axially facing zone will slide on, and be aligned with, a rock surface formed by the cutter at the leading edge of the axially facing zone.
The inventors have found that a rate of advance which is controlled in this way can be approximately the same as the rate of uncontrolled advance achieved with a conventional reamer construction.
The blocks 301, 302, 303 have cutters 211-215 at their lower cutting portions as in
A middle section between these two ends has an outer surface 320 which is a part-cylindrical surface at full gauge. Within this middle section, each block includes a length 305 without cutters which is a full gauge stabilising pad. As in
As disclosed in copending GB patent application GB2520998A, these lengths 305 which provide stabilising pads are at different axial positions on the blocks in order to provide stabilisation without preventing expansion of the reamer. As the reamer is expanded, each stabilising pad presses on the borehole wall. The pads cannot cut into the wall but the other two cutter blocks have cutters at the corresponding axial position and these do cut into the wall. This arrangement avoids placing three stabilising pads at the same axial position on the reamer, which does prevent expansion.
The remainder of each middle section of each block is provided with a row of cutters which are embedded so that their faces are exposed in a slanted area 304 and their radial extremities are aligned with the outer surface 320. However, these cutters are made with a truncated cylindrical shape and are secured to the support structure such that, as seen in
As can be seen from the drawing, the cutters in the lower cutting portions of blocks 302, 303 are positioned axially further from the end of the block than the corresponding cutters on block 301.
Near the trailing edge of surface 320, each block has a row of hard inserts 324 which are set flush with the surface 320 and are harder than the surface 320 of the steel outer part of the block, so as to resist wear. These hard inserts may be made of tungsten carbide particles sintered with a binder. There are also hard inserts 326 embedded to be flush with surfaces 231-234.
Modifications to the above embodiments are possible, and features shown in the drawings may be used separately or in any combination. The geometrical arrangements of supporting structure and cutters could also be used in a reamer which does not expand and instead has cutter blocks at a fixed distance from the reamer axis. Other mechanisms for expanding a reamer are known and may be used. Cutters may be embedded or partially embedded in supporting structure. They may be secured by brazing or in other ways. The hard faces of the cutters will of course need to be exposed so that they can cut rock, but the radially inner part of a cylindrical cutters' hard face may possibly be covered or hidden by a part of the support structure so that the hard face is only partially exposed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1412932.4 | Jul 2014 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/041265 | 7/21/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/014477 | 1/28/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4431065 | Andrews | Feb 1984 | A |
4440247 | Sartor | Apr 1984 | A |
4499959 | Grappendorf | Feb 1985 | A |
4593777 | Barr | Jun 1986 | A |
4710074 | Springer | Dec 1987 | A |
4887668 | Lynde et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5070952 | Neff | Dec 1991 | A |
5238075 | Keith | Aug 1993 | A |
5341888 | Deschutter | Aug 1994 | A |
5495899 | Pastusek | Mar 1996 | A |
5531281 | Murdock | Jul 1996 | A |
5967247 | Pessier | Oct 1999 | A |
6021858 | Southland | Feb 2000 | A |
6397958 | Charles | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6732817 | Dewey | May 2004 | B2 |
6880650 | Hoffmaster et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6920923 | Pietrobelli et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7228901 | Vail, III | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7467671 | Savignat et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7506703 | Campbell | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7571782 | Hall | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7726415 | Tipton | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7954564 | Makkar | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963348 | Laird et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975783 | Fanuel et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8162081 | Ballard | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8205689 | Radford | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8297381 | Radford et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8517124 | Hareland | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8550188 | Makkar et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8607900 | Smith | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8720611 | Chen | May 2014 | B2 |
8752649 | Isenhour | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8776912 | Makkar | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8905126 | Krieg et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9051793 | Makkar | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9068407 | Radford et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9074434 | Mensa-Wilmot | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9187958 | Mensa-Wilmot | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9273519 | Smith | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9359825 | Gavia et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9593538 | Rasheed | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9739094 | Moreno, II | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9864821 | Chen | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010020552 | Beaton et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020166703 | Presley | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030029644 | Hoffmaster et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030155155 | Dewey | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040188149 | Thigpen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222022 | Nevlud et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050034897 | Youan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070089912 | Eddison et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070163808 | Campbell | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205024 | Mensa-Wilmot | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080128174 | Radford | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128175 | Radford | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149396 | Fyfe | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080190670 | Welch | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080314645 | Hall | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090145666 | Radford | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090294173 | Laird et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090294178 | Radford | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321138 | Shamburger | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012387 | Huynh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018779 | Makkar | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100051349 | Ballard | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089649 | Welch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100224414 | Radford | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263875 | Williams et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276201 | Makkar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110005836 | Radfprd et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005841 | Wood et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031029 | Gavia | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110120777 | Lee | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127087 | Hareland | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110259650 | Hall | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120012398 | Hall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120073879 | Makkar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120138365 | Maurstad | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152543 | Davis | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152623 | Chen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120205151 | Inoue et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120205157 | Radford et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120255786 | Isenhour | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130075167 | Knull | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130087386 | Radford et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130146361 | Makkar | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130199855 | Shears | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130256036 | Lyons | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130306380 | Oesterberg | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130341100 | Zhang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140008128 | Adam | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140048335 | Mensa-Wilmot | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048336 | Mensa-Wilmot | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140097024 | Haugvaldstad | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140246247 | Smith | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262523 | Davis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278282 | Chen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150068813 | Moreno, II | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150144405 | Salvo | May 2015 | A1 |
20160290067 | Tipples | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160305190 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170058611 | Lin, Jr. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170204670 | Hird | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211332 | Hird | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211333 | Hird | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211334 | Hird | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211335 | Hird | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170218707 | Hird | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180094496 | Su | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180179825 | Johnson | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2397110 | Feb 2003 | CA |
2821495 | Jun 2012 | CA |
102086756 | Jun 2011 | CN |
0385673 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0397417 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0869256 | Oct 1998 | EP |
1811124 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2097610 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2339227 | Nov 2002 | GB |
2417267 | Feb 2006 | GB |
2520998 | Jun 2015 | GB |
2546518 | Jul 2017 | GB |
03102354 | Dec 2003 | WO |
20040101943 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005047644 | May 2005 | WO |
2005052301 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2007041811 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008100194 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2011017394 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2013134629 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013167954 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO-2013173607 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014150524 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015054227 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015114407 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO-2015167786 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2015167788 | Nov 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/068991, dated Mar. 25, 2015, 14 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17 of UK Patent Application No. 1412934.0, dated Jan. 16, 2015, 4 pages. |
Exam Report under Section 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1412934.0, dated Sep. 2, 2016, 2 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041224, dated Oct. 8, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/328,051, dated Aug. 24, 2018, 22 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041260, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 11 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) of UK Patent Application No. 1412933.2, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 4 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) of UK Patent Application No. 1412932.4, dated Jan. 16, 2015, 3 pages. |
Exam Report under Section 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1412932.4, dated Jan. 23, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exam Report under Section 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1412932.4, dated Nov. 18, 2016, 5 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) of UK Patent Application No. 1412932.4, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 3 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041223, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 11 pages. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) of UK Patent Application No. 1412929.0, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 3 pages. |
combined Search and Exam Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1321625.4, dated Nov. 25, 2015, 8 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041280, dated Oct. 13, 2015, 12 pages. |
Combined Search and Exam Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1412930.8, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 5 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/040295, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 12 pages. |
combined Search and Exam Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) of UK Patent Application No. 1321625.4, dated May 1, 2014, 5 pages. |
European Search Report of EP Patent Application No. 14868423.6, dated Nov. 23, 2016, 3 pages. |
European Exam Report of EP Patent Application No. 14868423.6, dated Jan. 3, 2017, 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/102,039, dated, Jun. 1, 2018, 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/328,059, dated Mar. 12, 2019, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170218707 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |