Rear collision warning system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6831572
  • Patent Number
    6,831,572
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 29, 2002
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 14, 2004
    21 years ago
Abstract
A rear collision warning system (10) for a target vehicle (17) and an approaching vehicle (18) is provided. The rear collision warning system (10) includes a first transmitter (54) located on the approaching vehicle (18) and directed at the target vehicle (17). The first transmitter (54) generates a vehicle information signal. A first indicator (16) located on the target vehicle (17). A first receiver (50) electrically coupled to the first indicator (16) receives the vehicle information signal and transmits a warning signal to the approaching vehicle (18) when the vehicle information signal is above a predetermined magnitude. A method of performing the same is also provided.
Description




BACKGROUND OF INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to collision warning systems, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for warning both operators of two imminent and potentially collidable vehicles of their close proximity.




Collision warning systems are becoming more widely used. Collision warning systems provide a vehicle operator knowledge and awareness of objects or vehicles within a close proximity so as to prevent colliding with those objects. Current collision warning systems are unitary in nature in that they only warn the operator of the vehicle containing the collision warning system of a potential collision. A sensor located on a vehicle, upon sensing an object generates an object detection signal, which is communicated to the operator of that vehicle.




Typically, a collision that occurs between two moving vehicles occurs over a short duration of time, that may not be long enough in extent for an operator to react. Reaction time is critical in preventing collisions. The longer the available reaction time, the lower the probability of the collision ever occurring. Some data indicates that half of all collisions between vehicles could be avoided if each driver would initiate his accident avoidance maneuver between one and one half second earlier. A factor that affects operator reaction time is the manner in which a vehicle collision warning system indicates to the operator an impending collision. Other factors are also relevant in preventing a collision such as whether the operator is distracted so as to not visualize or hear a collision-warning signal, which can impede the operator from reacting in time.




Current collision warning systems have absorbed some of these potential downfalls by creating large lead times, thereby warning the operator far in advance of a potential collision. Some active collision warning systems have considered interrupting verbal and visual communications within the vehicle or applying the brakes or other countermeasures. Yet other warning systems have considered the use of deceleration brake lights that have widening illumination with decreases in vehicle speed, as to warn rearly approaching vehicles of a nearing decelerating vehicle.




The above-mentioned warning systems have several disadvantages. Due to drastically increased warning times the operator of a vehicle may be prematurely warned of a potential collision. The operator, because of the far in advance warning, may find the system to be inaccurate and less likely to heed to the warning signals. Therefore, the above warning systems are limited in their prevention of a collision. The above-mentioned warning systems also do not address closing speed of the approaching vehicle and the likelihood of a collision.




Therefore, it would be desirable to provide an improved rear collision warning system. The improved system may increase reaction time and decrease the probability of a collision occurring.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




Accordingly, an advantage of the present invention is to provide an improved rear collision warning system for use in an automotive vehicle.




The foregoing and other advantages are provided by a method and apparatus for warning both operators of two imminent and potentially collidable vehicles of their close proximity. A rear collision warning system for a target vehicle and an approaching vehicle is provided. The rear collision warning system includes a first transmitter located on the approaching vehicle and directed at the target vehicle. The first transmitter generates a vehicle information signal to a first indicator located on the target vehicle. A first receiver electrically coupled to the first indicator receives the vehicle information signal and transmits a warning signal to the approaching vehicle when the vehicle information signal is above a predetermined magnitude. A method of performing the same is also provided.




One of several advantages of the present invention is that it provides a system for not only warning a target vehicle of a potential collision, but also warning an approaching vehicle.




Another advantage of the present invention is that it increases the reaction time for both operators of the target vehicle and the approaching vehicle. Thereby, decreasing the probability of a collision between the two vehicles.




Additionally, the present invention provides multiple methods of warning both vehicle operators of the potential for a collision, increasing the overall versatility of the rear collision warning system.




Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for enacting countermeasures to prevent injury of the vehicle operators in case of a collision.




The present invention itself, together with attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS




For a more complete understanding of this invention reference should now be had to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying figures and described below by way of examples of the invention.





FIG. 1

is a schematic view illustrating a sensor implementation technique of a rear collision warning system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic view of a wireless communication implementation technique of a rear collision warning system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram of a rear collision warning system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a logic flow diagram illustrating a method of preventing a rear collision between an approaching vehicle and a target vehicle, according to an embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




While the present invention is described with respect to a method and apparatus for warning both operators of two imminent and potentially collidable vehicles of their close proximity, the present invention may be adapted to be used in various systems including: forward collision warning systems, collision avoidance systems, vehicle systems, or other systems that may require collision avoidance.




In the following description, various operating parameters and components are described for one constructed embodiment. These specific parameters and components are included as examples and are not meant to be limiting.




Also, in the following description, the terms “target vehicle” and “approaching vehicle” are relative terms used to reference a vehicle for a particular situation or application of the present invention. By no means do these terms only refer to a certain vehicle position relative to the position of another vehicle. For example, an approaching vehicle may refer to a first vehicle that is approaching a second vehicle from behind or it may refer to the second vehicle that is forward of the first vehicle but is becoming closer to the first vehicle.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a schematic view illustrating a sensor implementation technique of a rear collision warning system


10


in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown. The system


10


includes an object detection sensor


12


, a controller


14


, and an indicator


16


, all of which are located on a target vehicle


17


. The object detection sensor


12


senses an approaching vehicle


18


, represented by field lines


20


, and generates a detection signal that is transferred to the controller


14


. The controller


14


determines whether the detection signal is greater than a predetermined magnitude, constituting that the approaching vehicle


18


is within a predetermined distance and/or is accelerating toward or approaching the target vehicle


17


. The controller


14


warns the operator of the approaching vehicle


18


by a warning signal, represented by triangle


22


, via the indicator


16


that the approaching vehicle


18


may potentially collide with the target vehicle


17


. In so doing, the operator of the approaching vehicle


18


may react upon sensing the warning signal


22


and preventing a collision with the target vehicle


17


. In a less sophisticated system the object detection sensor


12


may directly transmit a warning signal to the indicator


16


when the detection signal is above the predetermined magnitude. The use of controller


14


provides added advantages over non-use of the controller


14


that will become more evident in the following description.




The object detection sensor


12


may be of various form and style including a radar sensor, a scanning laser radar sensor, a pair of stereo camera sensors, an infrared sensor, an ultrasonic sensor, or other sensor known in the art for detecting an object. The object sensor may be also located in various locations on the target vehicle


17


.




Controller


14


is preferably a microprocessor based controller such as a computer having a central processing unit, memory (RAM and/or ROM), and associated inputs and outputs communicating across a bus. Controller


14


may be a portion of central vehicle main control unit or a stand-alone rear collision controller.




The indicator


16


may be a pulsating indicator, a light bulb, an LED, a fluorescent light, a brake light, a tail light, a hazard light, a horn, or any other indicator that an operator of a vehicle may sense visually or audibly. The indicator


16


may vary in intensity, amplitude, size, or in a way so as to communicate to an operator of an approaching vehicle


18


that the potential for colliding with the target vehicle


17


is increasing or decreasing depending upon the proximity and/or velocity of the approaching vehicle


18


relative to the target vehicle


17


.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a pictorial view of a wireless communication implementation of a rear collision warning system


10


″ in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention is shown. The system


10


″ includes a first receiver


50


, a second transmitter


52


, a first controller


14


″, and a first indicator


16


, all of which are located in the target vehicle


17


. The system


10


″ also includes a first transmitter


54


, a second receiver


56


, a second controller


58


, and a second indicator


60


, all of which are located in the approaching vehicle


18


. The approaching vehicle


18


continuously transmits an information signal containing information of the location, velocity, and direction of travel of the approaching vehicle


18


. The first controller


14


″ receives the information signal via the first receiver


50


and determines whether to warn the operator of the approaching vehicle


18


via the indicator


16


and, if so, in what manner. As with the object detection sensor


16


in system


10


, the first receiver


50


may directly transmit a warning signal to the first indicator


16


. The first controller


14


″ may also transmit a warning signal via the second transmitter


52


to the second receiver


56


, as to communicate the warning signal to the second controller


58


. The second controller


58


may then determine whether, using the second indicator


60


, to warn the operator of the approaching vehicle


18


.




The transmitters


52


and


54


and the receivers


50


and


56


may be part of a radar system, a scanning laser radar system, a stereo camera system, an infrared sensing system, an ultrasonic sensing system, or other sensing system known in the art. The transmitters


52


and


54


and the receivers


50


and


56


may also be part of a communication system such as a Bluetooth wireless communication system, an 802.11A wireless communication system, an 802.11B wireless communication system, a satellite wireless communication system, or other communication system. The receivers


50


and


56


may be one of the following type: an AM/FM receiver, a wireless communication system receiver, a telematic system receiver, a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, a satellite receiver, and a navigation system receiver. The receivers


50


and


56


may receive warning signals or approaching vehicle information from either controller


14


″ or


58


, or a communication system external to both the approaching vehicle


18


and target vehicle


17


. For example, the receivers


50


and


56


may receive position information, of either vehicle


18


or


17


, from global positioning data received as part of a GPS.




Controllers


14


″ and


58


are similar to controller


14


, in system


10


, as to their internal componentry and some potential locations and uses within a vehicle. The controllers


14


″ and


58


may have additional logic and memory, above that of controller


14


, as to satisfy additional features of system


10


″.




The second indicator


60


may be of various type and style including a computer, an LED display, an LED, a PDA, a light bulb, a heads-up display, an audio system, a video system, or other indicator known in the art. Further explanation of the audio system and the video system is below and best illustrated in FIG.


3


.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, a block diagrammatic view of a rear collision warning system


10


″″ in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention is shown. System


10


″″ includes the transmitters


52


and


54


, receivers


50


and


56


, and indicators


16


and


60


as in system


10


″. System


10


″″ also includes a first controller


14


″″ and a second controller


58


″, which are similar to controllers


14


″ and


58


, respectively. Controllers


14


″″ and


58


″ may have additional logic and memory, above that of controllers


14


″ and


58


, for use in system


10


″″. The system


10


″″ also includes audio systems


100


and


102


, video systems


104


and


106


, restraint systems


108


and


110


, braking systems


112


and


114


, and fuel and power supply systems


116


and


118


for the target vehicle


17


and the approaching vehicle


18


, respectively.




The audio systems


100


and


102


and the video systems


104


and


106


of both the approaching vehicle


18


and the target vehicle


17


may be in communication with the second controller


58


″ and the first controller


14


″″, respectively, and be used as an indicator to warn an operator of a potential collision. The audio systems


100


and


102


may include a vehicle stereo system, a computer generated audio system, an entertainment system, and a sound-conveying device. Audio systems


100


and


102


may warn an operator in a verbal format such as a recorded voice, warning tones, and text-to-speech. Video systems


104


and


106


may include a radar display, a data capable phone, a wireless-enabled personal digital assistant, a navigation system, a telematic system, and a video entertainment system. The audio systems


100


and


102


and the video system


104


and


106


convey approaching vehicle information to an operator including proximity, position, velocity, distance, direction of travel, time to impact, and other relative information as to inform the operator of a potential collision. Time to impact refers to the amount of time between a warning signal and a predicted time of collision. The time to impact preferably includes velocity of the approaching vehicle


18


relative to the target vehicle


17


. Time to impact may also include other components such as whether one vehicle is accelerating or not, the distance between the vehicles, or other factors that may effect the probability of the approaching vehicle


18


colliding with the target vehicle


17


in a predicted time frame.




The restraints systems


108


and


110


of the approaching vehicle


18


and the target vehicle


17


are enacted by the controllers


14


″″ and


58


″ as a countermeasure to protect operators of both vehicles, in case of a collision. The restraint systems


108


and


110


may include a vehicles air bag deployment system containing frontal, side, side curtain, or other vehicle air bags. The restraint systems


108


and


110


may also include pretensioners, seat positioning systems, head restraint systems, or other restraint systems.




The controllers


14


″″ and


58


″ may also activate the braking systems


112


and


114


, downshift a vehicle transmission (not shown), or deactivate a vehicle fuel system or a portion of a vehicle power supply system in order to reduce traveling velocity of the vehicle and maintain a predetermined distance between the approaching vehicle


18


and the target vehicle


17


. This is another added precautionary measure, of the present invention, in preventing a potential collision.




All of the above-mentioned systems and embodiments of the present invention are not meant to be separate all-inclusive systems; they may share components and systems from each other depending upon the application.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, a logic flow diagram illustrating a method of preventing a rear collision between an approaching vehicle and a target vehicle is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.




In step


150


, an object detection sensor or a first receiver detects the approaching vehicle and signals a first controller as described above.




In step


152


, the first controller determines the proximity of the approaching vehicle relative to the target vehicle. The proximity is determined, using one of several methods including the target vehicle sensing the approaching vehicle, the target vehicle receiving a communication signal from the approaching vehicle, or the target vehicle determining proximity as part of a communication system that is partially external to both the approaching vehicle and the target vehicle. Proximity includes the relative position and distance of the approaching vehicle. The first controller, as stated above, may also determine the velocity and direction of travel of the approaching vehicle relative to the target vehicle, as well as, other factors in determining the probability of a collision between the approaching vehicle and the target vehicle.




In step


154


, the first controller continuously monitors the above-mentioned factors and signals the operators of the approaching vehicle and the target vehicle of a potential collision when any of the above mentioned factors are above corresponding predetermined magnitude or threshold levels. Controllers located on the approaching vehicle and the target vehicle then determine, in response to the above factors, whether to enact a countermeasure, and what countermeasures to enact. For example, when the time to impact is less than a particular predetermined duration, a controller may enact a pretensioner to pull the operator of a vehicle further into a driver seat as to aid in preventing operator injury during a collision. The proactive action of the controller activating the pretensioner further indicates to the operator that a collision has a high probability of occurring.




The present invention provides an improved rear collision warning system that increases reaction time for both the operator of an approaching vehicle and the operator of a target vehicle. The present invention is passive in that it warns vehicle operators of a potential collision and it is also active in that it activates countermeasures as to prevent a collision from ever occurring. The variety of potential uses and the versatility of the present invention allow it to be used for various purposes having various system and cost requirements.




The above-described apparatus, to one skilled in the art, is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following systems: forward collision warning systems, collision avoidance systems, vehicle systems, or other systems that may require collision avoidance. The above-described invention may also be varied without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention as contemplated by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A rear collision warning system for a target vehicle and an approaching vehicle comprising:a first transmitter located on the approaching vehicle and directed at the target vehicle, said first transmitter generating a vehicle information signal comprising at least partially approaching vehicle related information; a first indicator located on the target vehicle; and a first receiver electrically coupled to said first indicator, said first receiver receiving said vehicle information signal and generating a warning signal that is indicated via said indicator to the approaching vehicle when said vehicle information signal is above a predetermined magnitude.
  • 2. A system as in claim 1 further comprising a first controller electrically coupled to said first receiver and said first indicator, said first controller receiving said vehicle information signal and transmitting said warning signal to said first indicator when said vehicle information signal is above said predetermined magnitude.
  • 3. A system as in claim 2 further comprising said first controller determining relative velocity of the approaching vehicle relative to velocity of the target vehicle and signaling said first indicator in response to said relative velocity of the approaching vehicle.
  • 4. A system as in claim 2 further comprising said first controller determining proximity of the approaching vehicle relative to the target vehicle and signaling said first indicator in response to said determined proximity.
  • 5. A system as in claim 4 wherein said proximity comprises the relative position of said approaching vehicle to said target vehicle and distance between the target vehicle and the approaching vehicle.
  • 6. A system as in claim 2 further comprising said first controller determining direction of travel for said approaching vehicle relative to said target vehicle and signalling said first indicator in response to said determined direction of travel.
  • 7. A system as in claim 2 further comprising:said first controller determining time to impact between the target vehicle and the approaching vehicle in response to relative proximity of the target vehicle and the relative velocity of the target vehicle; and said first controller warning said approaching vehicle in response to said time to impact.
  • 8. A system as in claim 2 further comprising:said first controller determining time to impact between the target vehicle and the approaching vehicle in response to relative proximity of the target vehicle and the relative velocity of the target vehicle; and said first controller warning said target vehicle in response to said time to impact.
  • 9. A system as in claim 2 further comprising:a second transmitter located on the target vehicle and electrically coupled to said first controller; a second indicator located on the approaching vehicle; a second receiver electrically coupled to said indicator; and a second controller electrically coupled to said first transmitter, said second indicator, and said second receiver, said second controller in response to receiving said warning signal from said first controller via said second transmitter and said second receiver signaling said second indicator.
  • 10. A system as in claim 9 further comprising said second controller in response to said warning signal enacting a countermeasure, within the approaching vehicle, selected from the group consisting of: activating brakes, inhibiting fuel consumption, retracting seat belts, adjusting seat positioning, and downshifting a transmission.
  • 11. A system as in claim 2 further comprising said first controller in response to said warning signal enacting a countermeasure, within the target vehicle, selected from the group consisting of: activating brakes, inhibiting fuel consumption, retracting seat belts, adjusting seat positioning, and downshifting a transmission.
  • 12. A system as in claim 2 further comprising a wireless communication system for receiving and transmitting proximity, velocity, and direction of travel data, said wireless communication system selected from the following group consisting of: a Bluetooth wireless communication system, a 802.11A wireless communication system, a 802.11B wireless communication system, and a satellite wireless communication system.
  • 13. A system as in claim 2 further comprising said second controller signaling said second indicator in response to relative approaching vehicle proximity, velocity, or direction of travel.
US Referenced Citations (130)
Number Name Date Kind
3514610 Huston et al. May 1970 A
3892483 Saufferer Jul 1975 A
4257703 Goodrich Mar 1981 A
4381829 Montaron May 1983 A
4623966 O'Sullivan Nov 1986 A
4626850 Chey Dec 1986 A
4638289 Zottnik Jan 1987 A
4673937 Davis Jun 1987 A
4833469 David May 1989 A
4916450 Davis Apr 1990 A
4969103 Maekawa Nov 1990 A
4992943 McCracken Feb 1991 A
4994972 Diller Feb 1991 A
5040118 Diller Aug 1991 A
5063603 Burt Nov 1991 A
5091726 Shyu Feb 1992 A
5162794 Seith Nov 1992 A
5166881 Akasu Nov 1992 A
5173859 Deering Dec 1992 A
5182459 Okano et al. Jan 1993 A
5230400 Kakinami et al. Jul 1993 A
5234071 Kajiwara Aug 1993 A
5249157 Taylor Sep 1993 A
5295551 Sukonick Mar 1994 A
5307136 Saneyoshi Apr 1994 A
5314037 Shaw et al. May 1994 A
5428439 Parker et al. Jun 1995 A
5430432 Camhi et al. Jul 1995 A
5467283 Butsuen et al. Nov 1995 A
5479173 Yoshioka et al. Dec 1995 A
5502432 Ohmamyuda et al. Mar 1996 A
5521580 Kaneko et al. May 1996 A
5526269 Ishibashi et al. Jun 1996 A
5534870 Avignon et al. Jul 1996 A
5541590 Nishio Jul 1996 A
5552986 Omura et al. Sep 1996 A
5572428 Ishida et al. Nov 1996 A
5574463 Shirai et al. Nov 1996 A
5594414 Namngani Jan 1997 A
5602760 Chacon et al. Feb 1997 A
5604683 Roecker Feb 1997 A
5629847 Shirakawa et al. May 1997 A
5635922 Cho et al. Jun 1997 A
5646612 Byon Jul 1997 A
5680097 Uemura et al. Oct 1997 A
5684474 Gilon et al. Nov 1997 A
5689264 Ishikawa et al. Nov 1997 A
5699040 Matsuda Dec 1997 A
5699057 Ikeda et al. Dec 1997 A
5710565 Shirai et al. Jan 1998 A
5745870 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1998 A
5748477 Katoh May 1998 A
5749426 Gilling May 1998 A
5751211 Shirai et al. May 1998 A
5751836 Wildes et al. May 1998 A
5754099 Nishimura et al. May 1998 A
5771481 Gilling Jun 1998 A
5779264 Demesseman et al. Jul 1998 A
5808561 Kinoshita et al. Sep 1998 A
5815093 Kikinis Sep 1998 A
5835007 Kosiak Nov 1998 A
5835873 Darby et al. Nov 1998 A
5838228 Clark Nov 1998 A
5847472 Byon Dec 1998 A
5847755 Wixson et al. Dec 1998 A
5872536 Lyons et al. Feb 1999 A
5905457 Rashid May 1999 A
5906393 Mazur et al. May 1999 A
5920345 Sauer Jul 1999 A
5926126 Engelman Jul 1999 A
5936549 Tsuchiya Aug 1999 A
5938714 Satonaka Aug 1999 A
5948026 Beemer, II. et al. Sep 1999 A
5949366 Herrmann Sep 1999 A
5949918 McCaffrey Sep 1999 A
5955967 Yamada Sep 1999 A
5959552 Cho Sep 1999 A
5963272 Wixson Oct 1999 A
5964822 Alland et al. Oct 1999 A
5983161 Lemelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5995037 Matsuda et al. Nov 1999 A
5999117 Engel Dec 1999 A
5999874 Winner et al. Dec 1999 A
6002983 Alland et al. Dec 1999 A
6018308 Shirai Jan 2000 A
6025797 Kawai et al. Feb 2000 A
6026340 Corrado et al. Feb 2000 A
6031484 Bullinger et al. Feb 2000 A
6037860 Zander et al. Mar 2000 A
6044166 Bassman et al. Mar 2000 A
6044321 Nakamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6049619 Anandan et al. Apr 2000 A
6061105 Nakagawa May 2000 A
6076028 Donnelly et al. Jun 2000 A
6084508 Mai et al. Jul 2000 A
6085151 Farmer et al. Jul 2000 A
6087928 Kleinberg et al. Jul 2000 A
6088639 Fayyad et al. Jul 2000 A
6094159 Oterfeld et al. Jul 2000 A
6097332 Crosby, II Aug 2000 A
6114951 Kinoshita et al. Sep 2000 A
6121896 Rahman Sep 2000 A
6148943 Kodaka et al. Nov 2000 A
6151539 Bergholz et al. Nov 2000 A
6157892 Hada et al. Dec 2000 A
6161074 Sielagoski et al. Dec 2000 A
6168198 Breed et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169479 Boran et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177866 O'Connell Jan 2001 B1
6185490 Ferguson Feb 2001 B1
6186539 Foo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188316 Matsuno et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191704 Takenaga et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204756 Senyk et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209909 Breed Apr 2001 B1
6218960 Ishikawa et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219606 Wessels et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223125 Hall Apr 2001 B1
6225918 Kam May 2001 B1
6226389 Lemelson et al. May 2001 B1
6229438 Kutlucinar et al. May 2001 B1
6246961 Sasaki et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249738 Higashimata et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256584 Kodaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259992 Urai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278360 Yanagi Aug 2001 B1
6337638 Bates et al. Jan 2002 B1
6359552 King Mar 2002 B1
6580374 Schrage Jun 2003 B2
6614387 Deadman Sep 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0720928 Oct 1996 EP
54-65934 May 1979 JP
WO 9837435 Aug 1998 WO
WOX 9858274 Dec 1998 WO