This application claims priority to Japanese patent application no. 2022-061997 filed on Apr. 1, 2022, and to Japanese patent application no. 2022-107137 filed on Jul. 1, 2022, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
The disclosure of the present specification relates to a rebar tying tool, e.g., for use in tying together (binding) reinforcing bars used in reinforced concrete.
US 2018/207709 discloses a rebar tying tool (binding machine) that ties together (binds) reinforcing bars (hereinafter “rebars”) using a wire. This rebar tying tool comprises: a reel comprising a bobbin and the wire, which is wound around the bobbin; a reel-holding part configured to hold the reel in a rotatable manner; a feeding part (feeding unit) configured to advance the wire from the reel around the rebars; and a twisting part (twisting unit) configured to twist the wire after it has been curled (wound, looped) around the rebars. The wire used with this known rebar tying tool is a steel wire having a diameter of approximately 1 mm.
It is one non-limiting object of the present teachings to disclose techniques for tying together rebars more tightly.
Embodiments of rebar tying tools disclosed herein are configured to tie together (bind) rebars using a wire, e.g., for use in reinforcing concrete. Such rebar tying tools may comprise: a reel comprising a bobbin and the wire, which is wound on the bobbin; a reel-holding part configured to hold the reel in a rotatable manner; a feed part (feed mechanism) configured to advance the wire from the reel around the rebars (preferably by a predetermine number of turns or windings around the rebar; and a twisting part (twisting mechanism) configured to twist (terminal ends of) the wire that is around the rebars (i.e. after the wire has been looped (wound) around two or more rebars).
In one aspect of the present disclosure, the overall (total) maximum tensile load of the wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 1,050 N or more. The overall (total) maximum tensile load is calculated by multiplying the maximum tensile load of the wire by the number of turns of the wire around the rebars.
To tightly tie together (bind) the rebars, it is necessary to twist terminal ends of the wire that is curled or looped around two or more rebars with a strong force. However, if the overall maximum tensile load of the wire, which is looped around the rebars, is small (low), when the terminal ends of the looped wire are twisted with a strong force, there is a risk that the wire will fracture (break). On the other hand, if the overall maximum tensile load of the wire around the rebars is 1,050 N or more, even if the terminal ends of the wire that is looped around the rebars are twisted with a strong force, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of fracturing of the wire. Thus, by utilizing a wire that will have an overall maximum tensile load of at least 1,050 N after the predetermined number of turns of the wire have been wound around the rebars, the rebars can be tied more tightly.
In addition or in the alternative, in another aspect of the present teachings, the maximum tensile load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 700 N or more.
As was mentioned above, to tightly tie together the rebars, it is necessary to twist the terminal ends of the wire that is curled or looped around the rebars with a strong force. However, if the maximum tensile load per single (each) wire looped or curled around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) is small (low), when the terminal ends of the single looped wire are twisted with a strong force, there is a risk that the wire will fracture (break). On the other hand, if the maximum tensile load per single wire around the rebars is 700 N or more (i.e. if the wire wound on the bobbin has a maximum tensile load of at least 700 N), even if the terminal ends of the wire that is looped around the rebars are twisted with a strong force, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of fracturing of the wire. Thus, if a wire having a maximum tensile load of at least 700 N is wound on the bobbin and used to tie together the rebars, the rebars can be tied together more tightly.
In addition or in the alternative, in another aspect of the present teachings, the overall (total) yield-point load of the wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 700 N or more. The overall (total) yield-point load is calculated by multiplying the yield-point load of the wire by the number of turns of the wire around the rebars.
If the wire that ties together the rebars deforms in an adverse manner during the advancing or twisting process, one or more gaps might form between the rebars and the wire, and thereby the tying of the rebars will loosen in an adverse manner. Consequently, to tightly tie together the rebars, it is necessary to reduce the likelihood that the wire that ties together the rebars will adversely deform during the advancing or twisting process. If the overall yield-point load of the wire looped around the rebars by the predetermined number of turns is small (low) and a strong force acts on the terminal ends of the looped wire, there is a risk that the wire will deform in an adverse manner. On the other hand, if the overall yield-point load of the wire looped around the rebars by the predetermined number of turns is 700 N or more, even if a strong force acts on the wire that ties the rebars, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of adverse deformation of the wire. In this aspect as well, the rebars can be tied together more tightly.
In addition or in the alternative, in another aspect of the present teachings, the yield-point load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 450 N or more.
As was mentioned above, if the wire that ties together the rebars deforms in an adverse manner during the advancing or twisting process, one or more gaps might form between the rebars and the wire, and therefore the tying of the rebars will loosen in an adverse manner. Consequently, to tie the rebars tightly, it is necessary to reduce the likelihood that the wire that ties together the rebars will adversely deform during the advancing or twisting process. If the yield-point load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) is small (low) and a strong force acts on the looped wire, then there is a risk that the wire will deform in an adverse manner. On the other hand, if the yield-point load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) is 450 N or more, even if a strong force acts on the wire that ties together the rebars, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of adverse deformation of the wire. In this aspect as well, the rebars can be tied more tightly.
Representative, non-limiting concrete examples of the present invention are explained in detail below, with reference to the drawings. This detailed explanation is intended merely to illustrate to a person skilled in the art that details to implement preferred examples of the present invention are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. In addition, additional features and the invention disclosed below can be used separately from or together with other features and inventions to provide additional improved rebar tying tools, manufacturing methods, and methods of use.
In addition, the combinations of features and processes disclosed in the detailed explanation below are not essential to carry out the present invention in the broadest meaning and are recited only to explain representative concrete examples of the present invention in particular. Furthermore, in providing additional and useful embodiments of the present invention, the various features of the representative concrete examples above and below and the various features of the independent and dependent claims do not necessarily have to be combined as indicated in the concrete examples recited herein or as indicated in the sequence enumerated herein.
All features recited in the present specification and/or in the patent claims are intended, separately from the configuration of features recited in the working examples and/or the claims, to be disclosed individually and mutually independently as limitations relative to the specific matters disclosed in the disclosure and claims of the original patent application. Furthermore, description related to all numerical ranges, groups, and collections are intended to disclose intermediate configurations thereof as limitations relative to specific matters recited in the disclosure and the claims of the original patent application.
As was mentioned above, embodiments of rebar tying tools disclosed herein are configured tie together (bind) rebars using a wire, e.g., for use in reinforcing concrete. Such rebar tying tools may preferably comprise one or more of: a reel comprising a bobbin and the wire, which is wound on the bobbin; a reel-holding part configured to hold the reel in a rotatable manner; a feed part (feed mechanism) configured to advance the wire from the reel by a predetermined number of turns around the rebars; and a twisting part (twisting mechanism) configured to twist (terminal ends of) the wire after the predetermined number of turns have been wound around the rebars (i.e. after the wire has been looped around two or more rebars). Preferably, the overall (total) maximum tensile load of the wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 1,050 N or more, wherein the overall (total) maximum tensile load of the wire is calculated by multiplying the maximum tensile load of the wire by the predetermined number of turns of the wire that have been wound around the rebars. For example, the predetermined number of turns of the wire are preferably one or two, although the predetermined number of turns may be three or greater.
In one or more embodiments, the overall maximum tensile load of the wire after having been wound (looped) around the rebars by the predetermined number of turns may be within the range of 1,050-4,700 N.
Generally speaking, to increase the overall maximum tensile load of the wire around the rebars, it is necessary to increase the number (i.e. the number of turns or winding count) and/or the diameter of the wires. However, if the number of turns and/or the diameter of the wires is/are excessively large, then there is a risk that an excessive load will act on the motive-power source (e.g., an electric motor) that drives the twisting part. By utilizing a wire such that an overall maximum tensile load of at least 1,050 N will be achieved when the wire has been wound around the rebars by the predetermined number of turns, the rebars can be tied together more tightly (without breaking the wire) while reducing the likelihood that an excessive load will act on the motive-power source that drives the twisting part.
Preferably, the overall yield-point load of the wire wound (looped) around the rebars after the wire has been wound around the rebars by the predetermined number of turns may be 700 N or more, wherein the overall (total) yield-point load of the wire is calculated by multiplying the maximum yield-point load of the wire by the predetermined number of turns of the wire that have been wound around the rebars. For example, the predetermined number of turns of the wire are preferably one or two, although the predetermined number of turns may be three or greater.
In one or more embodiments, the overall yield-point load of the wire wound (looped) around the rebars after the wire has been wound the predetermined number of times around the rebars may be within the range of 700-2,550 N.
Generally speaking, when the overall yield-point load of the wire around the rebars is excessively large, the wire tends not to tightly contact the outer-circumferential surfaces of the rebars after the advancing and/or twisting operations, and thereby one or more gaps can adversely form between the wire and the rebars. In this case, it becomes difficult to tightly tie together the rebars. However, by suitably selecting the overall yield-point load of the wire within the above-noted range (e.g., by appropriately selecting the yield-point load of the wire wound on the bobbin and the predetermined number of turns of the wire around the rebars), the rebars can be tied together more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the twisting part (mechanism) may comprise a tip-holding part configured to hold a tip of the wire that has advanced around the rebars. The feed part (mechanism) may be configured to draw back (pull, tension) the wire after the tip-holding part holds the tip of the wire and before the twisting part twists the wire (i.e. the terminal ends of the wire looped around two or more rebars).
According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the feed part draws back the wire, when the twisting part twists the wire, the wire can be twisted from a state in which the wire has been brought into tighter contact with the rebars. By employing such a configuration, the rebars can be tied together more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the diameter of the wire may be 1.6 mm or more. Although the upper limit of the diameter of the wire is not particularly limited, the diameter of the wire may be, e.g., 5 mm or less, e.g., 4 mm or less when the predetermined number of turns is one and may be, e.g., 2.5 mm or less, e.g., 2.3 mm or less when the predetermined number of turns is two.
Such a wire enables the rebars to be tied together more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the diameter of a trunk part of the bobbin may be 50 mm or more. Although the upper limit of the diameter of the trunk part is not particularly limited, the diameter of the trunk part may be, e.g., 100 mm or less, e.g., 80 mm or less.
By making the diameter of the trunk part of the bobbin relatively large (i.e. at least 50 mm), it is possible to reduce the likelihood that a winding curl (curved plastic deformation) will be imparted to the wire due to the wire being wound on the bobbin.
In one or more embodiments, the feed part may comprise feed rollers, which advance the wire by rotating. The hardness of the feed rollers may be 56 HRC or more. Although the upper limit of the hardness of the feed rollers is not particularly limited, the hardness of the feed rollers may be, e.g., 70 HRC or less, e.g., 68 HRC or less.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to reduce the likelihood and/or amount of adverse wear on the feed rollers when the feed part advances the wire.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool may further comprise a cutting part comprising cutters configured to cut the wire after the wire has been looped around two or more rebars. The hardness of the cutters may be 56 HRC or more. Although the upper limit of the hardness of the cutters is not particularly limited, the hardness of the cutters may be, e.g., 70 HRC or less, e.g., 68 HRC or less.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to reduce the likelihood and/or amount of adverse wear on the cutters when the cutting part cuts the wire.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool may further comprise a grip (handle), which the user grips (grasps, hold) during a rebar tying operation so that the user can perform the work of tying together the rebars in a hand-held state.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, the rebars can be tied more tightly by using the hand-held-type rebar tying tool.
Preferably, the maximum tensile load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 700 N or more.
Preferably, the yield-point load per single wire looped around the rebars (i.e. the wire wound on the bobbin) may be 450 N or more.
The rebar tying tool 2 shown in
The rebar tying tool 2 comprises a housing 16. The housing 16 constitutes a portion of a support part 15. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The rebar tying tool 2 comprises a feed part (feed mechanism) 38, a guide part (wire guide) 40, a cutting part (cutter or cutting mechanism) 44, and the twisting part (twisting mechanism) 46. The feed part 38 is disposed in the interior of a front-side lower portion of the main body 4. The guide part 40 is disposed at a front portion of the main body 4. The cutting part 44 is disposed in the interior of a lower portion of the main body 4. The twisting part 46 is disposed in the interior of the main body 4.
As shown in
The speed-reducing part 52 comprises, for example, a planetary-gear mechanism. The speed-reducing part 52 reduces the speed of the rotation of the feed motor 50. In other words, the speed-reducing part is configured to convert the rotational output from the feed motor 50 into a rotational output having a lower rotational speed but higher torque than the rotational output from the feed motor 50.
Referring to
Rotation is transmitted from the speed-reducing part 52 to the drive gear 60. The first feed gear 62 is supported on (by) the base member 56 in a rotatable manner. The first feed gear 62 meshes with the drive gear 60. Rotation of the drive gear 60 causes the first feed gear 62 to rotate. The first feed gear 62 has a groove 62a configured to receive a first circumferential half (semi-circle) of the wire W. The groove 62a is formed on the outer-circumferential surface of the first feed gear 62 in a direction along the rotational direction of the first feed gear 62. The second feed gear 64 meshes with the first feed gear 62. The second feed gear 64 is supported on (by) the release lever 66 in a rotatable manner. The second feed gear 64 has a groove 64a configured to receive a second circumferential half (semi-circle) of the wire W. The groove 64a is formed on the outer-circumferential surface of the second feed gear 64 in a direction along the rotational direction of the second feed gear 64. The release lever 66 is supported on the base member 56 so as to be swingable (pivotable) about a pivot shaft 66a. The compression spring 68 biases (urges) the release lever 66 relative to the right housing half 18 (refer to
As shown in
As shown in
The wire W fed from the feed part 38 (refer to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The speed-reducing part 88 is fixed to the right housing half 18 and the left housing half 20. The speed-reducing part 88 comprises, for example, a planetary-gear mechanism. The speed-reducing part 88 reduces the speed of the rotation of the twisting motor 86. In other words, the speed-reducing part is configured to convert the rotational output from the twisting motor 86 into a rotational output having a lower rotational speed but higher torque than the rotational output from the twisting motor 86.
As shown in
The bearing box 96 is fixed to the speed-reducing part 88. The bearing box 96 supports the carrier sleeve 98 in a rotatable manner via a bearing 96a. Rotation from the speed-reducing part 88 is transmitted to the carrier sleeve 98. When the rotor of the twisting motor 86 forwardly rotates (rotates in a first rotational direction), the carrier sleeve 98 rotates in the direction of a left-hand screw, viewed from the rear side. When the twisting motor 86 reversely rotates (rotates in a second rotational direction that is opposite of the first rotational direction), the carrier sleeve 98 rotates in the direction of a right-hand screw, viewed from the rear side.
As shown in
A rear part 102a of the screw shaft 102 is inserted into the carrier sleeve 98 from the front side and is fixed to the clutch plate 100. A flange 102c, which protrudes radially, is formed between the rear part 102a and a front part 102b of the screw shaft 102. A ball groove 102d, which has a helical shape, is formed on the outer-circumferential surface of the front part 102b of the screw shaft 102. An engaging part 102e, the diameter of which is smaller than that of the front part 102b, is formed at the front end of the screw shaft 102.
As shown in
The clamp shaft 110 is inserted into the inner sleeve 104 from the front side. The engaging part 102e of the screw shaft 102 is inserted into the rear end of the clamp shaft 110. The clamp shaft 110 is fixed to the screw shaft 102. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In the state in which the clamp shaft 110 is mounted on the inner sleeve 104 as shown in
As shown in
In the initial state in which the clamp shaft 110 is protruding from the outer sleeve 106 in the forward direction, the left clamp 114 is located at its leftward-most position relative to the clamp shaft 110. In this state, a left-side wire passageway 134, through which the wire W passes, is formed between the downward protruding part 114c of the left clamp 114 and the flat-plate part 110a of the clamp shaft 110. This state of the left clamp 114 is called the fully open state. From this state, when the outer sleeve 106 moves forward relative to the clamp shaft 110, the left clamp 114 moves rightward toward the clamp shaft 110. In this state as well, although the wire W can pass through the left-side wire passageway 134, the rear side of the left-side wire passageway 134 is covered by the rear-side guard part 114e, and the front side of the left-side wire passageway 134 is covered by the front-side guard part 114f. This state of the left clamp 114 is called the semi-open state. From this state, when the outer sleeve 106 moves further forward relative to the clamp shaft 110, the left clamp 114 moves further rightward toward the clamp shaft 110. In this state, the wire W is sandwiched (interposed) between the upper end of the contact part 114d of the left clamp 114 and the lower end of the flat-plate part 110a of the clamp shaft 110. This state of the left clamp 114 is called the fully closed state.
The wire W fed from the feed part 38 (refer to
In addition, the wire W, which is guided by the guide part 40, passes through the right-side wire passageway 132. Consequently, when the right clamp 112 reaches (assumes) the fully closed state, the tip of the wire W wound around the rebars R is held by the right clamp 112 and the clamp shaft 110.
As shown in
The rotation-blocking part 92 is disposed at a location corresponding to the fins 138 of the outer sleeve 106. The rotation-blocking part 92 cooperates with the fins 138 to permit or prohibit (block) rotation of the outer sleeve 106. As shown in
When, relative to the upper stopper 142, the rotor of the twisting motor 86 (refer to
When, relative to the lower stopper 144, the rotor of the twisting motor 86 forwardly rotates and the screw shaft 102 rotates in the direction of a left-hand screw viewed from the rear side, even if the fins 138 of the outer sleeve 106 make contact with the blocking piece 144a, they push in, as is, the blocking piece 144a. In this situation, the lower stopper 144 does not prohibit (block) rotation of the outer sleeve 106. On the other hand, when the screw shaft 102 rotates in the direction of a right-hand screw viewed from the rear side, rotation of the outer sleeve 106 is prohibited (blocked) by the lower stopper 144 when the fins 138 of the outer sleeve 106 make contact with the blocking piece 144a.
Next, a representative, non-limiting operation of the rebar tying tool 2 shown in
When the rotor of the feed motor 50 shown in
After the advancing process ends, the twisting motor 86 shown in
After the tip-holding process ends, the feed motor 50 shown in
After the draw-back process ends, the twisting motor 86 shown in
After the terminal-end holding process ends, the twisting motor 86 shown in
After the cutting process ends, the twisting motor 86 shown in
After the cutting process ends or after the twisting process ends, the twisting motor 86 shown in
The rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example can perform a single-winding-type tying operation, wherein the wire W is wound one turn around the rebars R and the one wire W is twisted. In addition, the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example can also perform a double-winding-type tying operation, wherein the wire W is wound two turns around the rebars R and two of the wires W are twisted at the same time, as will be further explained below.
When the single-winding-type tying operation is to be performed (i.e. the predetermined number of turns of the wire around the rebars is one), the rebar tying tool 2 performs, in order, the advancing process, the tip-holding process, the draw-back process, the terminal-end holding process, the cutting process, the twisting process, and the returning process. In this single-winding-type tying operation, the wire W is advanced by the feed part 38, the tip of the wire W is held by the twisting part 46, the wire W is drawn back by the feed part 38, the terminal end of the wire W is also held by the twisting part 46, and the wire W is cut by the cutting part 44. Thereafter, the first and second terminal end portions of the wire W are twisted together by the twisting part 46.
When the double-winding-type tying operation is performed (i.e. the predetermined number of turns of the wire around the rebars is two), first, the rebar tying tool 2 performs, in order, the advancing process, the tip-holding process, the draw-back process, the terminal-end holding process, and the cutting process, and then performs the returning process. In this double-winding-type tying operation, the first turn of the wire W is advanced by the feed part 38, the tip of the first turn of the wire W is held by the twisting part 46, the first turn of the wire W is drawn back by the feed part 38, the terminal end of the first turn of the wire W is also held by the twisting part 46, and the first turn of the wire W is cut by the cutting part 44. Thereafter, the twisting part 46 releases the holding of the tip and the holding of the rear end of the first turn of the wire W. Subsequently, the rebar tying tool 2 performs, in order, the advancing process, the tip-holding process, the draw-back process, the terminal-end holding process, the cutting process, the twisting process, and an initial-state returning process. At this time, the second turn of the wire W is advanced by the feed part 38, the tip of the first turn of the wire W and the tip of the second turn of the wire W are held by the twisting part 46, the second turn of the wire W is drawn back by the feed part 38, the terminal end portion of the first turn of the wire W and the terminal end portion of the second turn of the wire W are held by the twisting part 46, and the second turn of the wire W is cut by the cutting part 44. From this state, the terminal end portions of the first turn of the wire W and the terminal end portions of the second turn of the wire W are twisted together by the twisting part 46.
As shown in
As shown in
For example, when the rebars R are tied together using the single-winding method of the rebar tying tool 2 (in
In addition, when the rebars R are tied using the double-winding method of the rebar tying tool 2 (in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 of the present working example, the bobbin 160 having a trunk-part diameter of 50 mm or more, or for example 52 mm or more, or for example 54 mm or more, is used as the bobbin 160 of the reel 33 shown in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example, in the feed part 38 shown in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example, in the feed part 38, a metal having a hardness of 56 HRC or more, or for example a hardness of 58 HRC or more, or for example a hardness of 60 HRC or more, or for example a hardness of 62 HRC or more, or for example a hardness of 64 HRC or more, or for example a hardness of 66 HRC or more is used as the material of the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64. By employing such a configuration, even if the diameter of the wire W is large and, attendant therewith, the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64 are strongly pressed against the wire W, wear of the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64 can be curtailed.
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example, in the feed part 38, a motor having a rated output within the range of 100-500 W, or for example within the range of 150-400 W, is used as the feed motor 50. By employing such a configuration, even if the diameter of the wire W is large, the advancing and drawing back of the wire W can be performed reliably.
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 of the present working example, in the guide part 40 shown in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 of the present working example, in the cutting part 44 shown in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example, in the twisting part 46 shown in
With regard to the rebar tying tool 2 according to the present working example, in the twisting part 46, a motor having a rated output within the range of 100-500 W, or for example within the range of 150-400 W, is used as the twisting motor 86. By employing such a configuration, even if the diameter of the wire W is large, the twisting of the end portions of the wire W can be performed reliably, and thereby the wire W can be tightly tied.
In the tying operation of the rebar tying tool 2 described above, the draw-back process may be omitted for either the single-winding method or the double-winding method.
In the rebar tying tool 2 described above, the feed motor 50 and/or the twisting motor 86 may be a brushed DC motor, or may be an AC motor, or may be some other type of motor.
In the rebar tying tool 2 described above, the reel holder 10, the feed part 38, the guide part 40, the cutting part 44, and the twisting part 46 may be differently arranged. For example, the reel holder 10 may be disposed on a rear-side upper portion of the main body 4, the feed part 38 may be disposed between the reel holder 10 and the guide part 40 at an upper portion of the main body 4, or the cutting part 44 may be disposed between the feed part 38 and the guide part 40 in the interior of the main body 4.
In the rebar tying tool 2 described above, the right clamp 112 and the clamp shaft 110 may be configured such that they do not hold the tip of the wire W, or the left clamp 114 and the clamp shaft 110 may be configured such that they do not hold the terminal end of the wire W; and in the tying operation of the rebar tying tool 2, the tip-holding process and the terminal-end holding process may be omitted. In such a modified embodiment, in the twisting process, the wire W that has been wound around the rebars R is twisted by being wound in response to the rotation of the clamp shaft 110, the right clamp 112, and the left clamp 114.
In the rebar tying tool 2 described above, instead of the battery-mount part 8, on which the battery pack B is mountable, a power-supply-cord connecting part, to which a power-supply cord that supplies electric power from an external power supply can connect, may be provided. In this situation, the rebar tying tool 2 operates using electric power supplied via the power-supply cord.
Instead of the rebar tying tool 2 being used by the user gripping the grip 6, the rebar tying tool 2 may be used by being installed on a rebar-tying robot that comprises a transport unit, which transports the rebar tying tool 2, and a manipulation unit, which manipulates the trigger 12.
In one or more of the embodiments as described above, the rebar tying tool 2 ties together the rebars R using the wire W. The rebar tying tool 2 comprises: the reel 33 comprising the bobbin 160 and the wire W, which is wound on the bobbin 160; the reel-holding part 10 (example of reel-holding part) configured to hold the reel 33 in a rotatable manner; the feed part 38 configured to advance the wire W from the reel 33 a predetermined number of turns around the rebars R; and the twisting part 46 configured to twist the wire W that has been looped around the rebars R. The overall maximum tensile load of the wire W after the wire W has been wound around the rebars R by the predetermined number of turns is 1,050 N or more.
As was described above, to tightly tie together the rebars R, it is necessary to twist the wire W that is looped around the rebars R with a strong force. Nevertheless, if the overall maximum tensile load of the wire W around the rebars R is small, when the wire W that is around the rebars R is twisted with a strong force, there is a risk that the wire W will fracture. According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the overall maximum tensile load of the wire W around the rebars R is 1,050 N or more, even if the wire W that is around the rebars R is twisted with a strong force, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of fracturing of the wire W. By employing such a configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the overall maximum tensile load of the wire W around the rebars R is within the range of 1,050-4,700 N.
Generally speaking, to make the overall maximum tensile load of the wire W around the rebars R large, it is necessary to make the number and diameter of the wires W large. Nevertheless, if the number of turns and/or the diameter of the wires W is (are) excessively large, then there is a risk that an excessive load will act on the motive-power source (e.g., the twisting motor 86) that drives the twisting part 46. According to the above-mentioned configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly while reducing the likelihood that an excessive load will act on the motive-power source that drives the twisting part 46 during the twisting operation.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool 2 ties together rebars R using the wire W. The rebar tying tool 2 comprises: the reel 33 comprising the bobbin 160 and the wire W, which is wound on the bobbin 160; the reel-holding part 10 (example of a reel-holding part) configured to hold the reel 33 in a rotatable manner; the feed part 38 configured to advance the wire W around the rebars R from the reel 33; and the twisting part 46 configured to twist the wire W that is around the rebars R. The overall yield-point load of the wire W after the wire W has been wound around the rebars R by the predetermined number of turns is 700 N or more.
If the wire W that ties together the rebars R deforms in an adverse manner, one or more gaps may form between the rebars R and the wire W, and thereby the tying (binding) of the rebars R will loosen in an adverse manner. Consequently, to tightly tie the rebars R together, it is necessary to make it difficult for the wire W that ties together the rebars R to deform. Nevertheless, if the overall yield-point load of the wire W around the rebars R is small, if a strong force acts on the wire W that ties together the rebars R, there is a risk that the wire W will deform in an adverse manner. According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the overall yield-point load of the wire W around the rebars R is 700 N or more, even if a strong force acts on the wire W that ties the rebars R, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of adverse deformation of the wire W. By employing such a configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the overall yield-point load of the wire W around the rebars R is within the range of 700-2,550 N.
Generally speaking, if the overall yield-point load of the wire W around the rebars R is excessively large, it becomes difficult for the wire W to tightly contact the outer-circumferential surfaces of the rebars R, and thereby one or more gaps may adversely form between the wire W and the rebars R, and it becomes difficult to tightly tie together the rebars R. According to the above-mentioned configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the twisting part 46 comprises the holding part 90 (example of a tip-holding part) configured to hold the tip of the wire W that has advanced around the rebars R. The feed part 38 is configured to draw back the wire W after the holding part 90 holds the tip of the wire W and before the twisting part 46 twists the wire W.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the feed part 38 draws back the wire W, when the twisting part 46 twists the wire, the wire W can be twisted from a state in which the wire W has been brought into tighter contact with the rebars R. By employing such a configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the diameter of the wire W may be 1.6 mm or more.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, the rebars R can be tied together more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the diameter of the trunk part of the bobbin 160 is 50 mm or more.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of a winding curl being imparted to the wire W due to the wire W being wound (and stored) on the bobbin 160.
In one or more embodiments, the feed part 38 comprises the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64 (example of feed rollers), which advances the wire W by rotating. The hardness of the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64 is 56 HRC or more.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to reduce the likelihood and/or amount of adverse wear of the first feed gear 62 and the second feed gear 64 when the feed part 38 advances the wire W.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool 2 further comprises the cutting part 44 comprising the fixed-cutter member 72 and the movable-cutter member 74 (example of cutters) that cut the wire W. The hardness of the fixed-cutter member 72 and the movable-cutter member 74 is 56 HRC or more.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, it is possible to reduce the likelihood and/or amount of adverse wear of the fixed-cutter member 72 and the movable-cutter member 74 when the cutting part 44 cuts the wire W.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool 2 further comprises the grip 6, which the user grips. The user is capable of performing the work of tying the rebars R in the state in which the user grips the rebar tying tool 2 with their hand.
According to the above-mentioned configuration, the rebars R can be tied together more tightly by using the hand-held type rebar tying tool 2.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool 2 ties together rebars R using the wire W. The rebar tying tool 2 comprises: the reel 33 comprising the bobbin 160 and the wire W, which is wound on the bobbin 160; the reel holder 10 (example of a reel-holding part) configured to hold the reel 33 in a rotatable manner; the feed part 38 configured to advance the wire W around the rebars R from the reel 33; and the twisting part 46 configured to twist the wire W that is around the rebars R. The maximum tensile load per single wire W around the rebars R is 700 N or more.
To tightly tie the rebars R, it is necessary to twist the wire W that is around the rebars R with a strong force. Nevertheless, if the maximum tensile load per single wire W around the rebars R is small, when the wire W that has been around the rebars R is twisted with a strong force, there is a risk that the wire W will fracture. According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the maximum tensile load per single wire W around the rebars R is 700 N or more, even if the wire W that is around the rebars R is twisted with a strong force, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of fracturing of the wire W. By employing such a configuration, the rebars R can be tied more tightly.
In one or more embodiments, the rebar tying tool 2 ties together rebars R using the wire W. The rebar tying tool 2 comprises: the reel 33 comprising the bobbin 160 and the wire W, which is wound on the bobbin 160; the reel holder 10 (example of the reel-holding part) configured to hold the reel 33 in a rotatable manner; the feed part 38 configured to advance the wire W around the rebars R from the reel 33; and the twisting part 46 configured to twist the wire W that is around the rebars R. The yield-point load per single wire W around the rebars R is 450 N or more.
If the wire W that ties together the rebars R deforms in an adverse manner, a gap or gaps will be formed between the rebars R and the wire W, and therefore the tying of the rebars R will loosen in an adverse manner. Consequently, to tie together the rebars R tightly, it is necessary to make it difficult for the wire W that ties together the rebars R to deform. Nevertheless, if the yield-point load per single wire W around the rebars R is small, if a strong force acts on the wire W that ties the rebars R, then there is a risk that the wire W will deform in an adverse manner. According to the above-mentioned configuration, because the yield-point load per single wire W around the rebars R is 450 N or more, even if a strong force acts on the wire W that ties together the rebars R, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of adverse deformation of the wire W. By employing such a configuration, the rebars R can be tied together more tightly.
Additional teachings, embodiments, structures, circuits, processes, methods, advantages, etc., which are combinable with the rebar tying tools described herein to develop additional embodiments of the present teachings, are disclosed in the Applicant’s U.S. Pat. Nos. 11,529,669 and 11,554,409, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
15
16
16
a
18
20
22
24
24
a
24
b
26
26
a
26
b
26
c
28
30
31
32
33
36
38
40
44
46
50
52
54
56
58
58
a
60
62
62
a
64
64
a
66
66
a
68
70
70
a
71
71
a
72
72
a
74
74
a
76
78
80
82
86
88
90
92
96
96
a
98
98
a
98
b
98
c
100
100
a
102
102
a
102
b
102
c
102
d
102
e
104
104
a
104
b
106
106
a
108
110
110
a
110
b
110
c
110
d
112
112
a
112
b
112
c
112
d
112
e
112
f
112
h
114
114
a
114
b
114
c
114
d
114
e
114
f
114
h
116
118
120
122
124
126
128
130
131
132
134
138
138
a
138
b
140
140
a
140
b
142
142
a
144
144
a
146
148
160
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2022-061997 | Apr 2022 | JP | national |
2022-107137 | Jul 2022 | JP | national |