Rebuilt double hull vessel and method of rebuilding a single hull vessel into a double hull vessel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6357373
  • Patent Number
    6,357,373
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 12, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 19, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An existing single hull vessel is rebuilt to provide a double hull vessel by cutting and removing the topside decking and internal vessel structure of the single hull vessel and inserting an inner hull structure within a volume defined by the original hull. The original hull defines an exterior (outer hull) of the rebuilt double hull vessel and the inner hull defines an interior cargo carrying volume and forms a boundary in the event that the outer hull is penetrated. In addition, a trunk structure, raised deck, and lower bulkhead portions may be used to prevent the loss of cargo carrying capacity due to the new double hull. The double hull covers at least the length of the cargo carrying section of the vessel along the bottom and sides of the cargo section. This method of internal double hulling results in the original vessel structure being reused to the maximum extent possible, and the major exterior dimensions and outer hull hydrodynamic characteristics of the vessel remaining substantially the same after the process of double hulling is complete.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to shipbuilding and vessel repair, and more particularly, the present invention relates to a rebuilt double hull vessel and method of rebuilding a vessel having an existing single hull into a vessel having a double hull. Even more particularly, the present invention relates to a rebuilt double hull vessel and method of internal double hulling, wherein the existing internal structure and deck of a vessel are cut out and removed from the shell of the existing single hull, a new inner hull is fabricated and installed inside the existing outer hull to form a double hull design, the original internal and deck structure is modified, fitted over, and then coupled to the new inner hull.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The shipping and cargo moving industry is continually faced with customer demands for new and improved vessel designs and for new and improved methods of modifying the design of existing vessels. Substantial cost savings can be realized by a vessel owner in modifying or rebuilding existing vessels to incorporate improvements in vessel designs or otherwise extend the life of the vessel rather than paying the cost of building a new vessel.




In addition, new governmental and environmental regulations place certain restrictions and requirements on vessel owners and operators. These new or required designs must be capable of securely holding a cargo and also of being seaworthy. At the same time, a vessel must comply with shipping and environmental requirements and regulations.




A typical vessel comprises a vessel having a single hull design. This type of hull construction provides a single outer hull or skin that provides structural integrity and acts as a boundary between the operating environment of the vessel (e.g., the sea) and the cargo and internal structure of the vessel. The single hull typically includes a shell having a bottom, a port side, a starboard side, a bow, a stem, and a plurality of transverse and longitudinal bulkheads and internal stiffening frames that support and strengthen the shell of the hull. This internal framing typically comprises a combination of transverse and longitudinal members.




As a result of the recent heightened environmental awareness and several shipping mishaps, new governmental regulations have been implemented requiring the use of double hulls on designated vessels in U.S. waters out to the 200 mile economic zone limit. These double hull requirements are contained in the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA-90) and have been incorporated in U.S. Coast Guard regulations. In part, OPA-90 requires that all new tank vessels constructed under contracts awarded after 1990 must have double hulls and that all existing single hull vessels engaged in the marine transport of oil and petroleum products be rebuilt with double hulls or be retired between the years 1995 and 2015, depending on the size and age of the vessel.




This has created a great burden on carriers having existing single hull vessels. These single hull vessels will either have to be rebuilt to incorporate a double hull design at great cost to the carrier, or the vessel will have to be retired, in many cases years before the end of its economically useful life.




Double hull designs have been used in the construction of newer vessels in an effort to comply with the requirements of the OPA-90. These double hull vessels typically have an outer hull and an inner hull. The outer hull and the inner hull each have shell plating that forms the structural integrity of the hull. A combination of transverse and longitudinal framing is provided between the inner and the outer hull to help strengthen the shell plating. The idea behind a double hull is that the structural integrity of the outer hull may be breached without breaching the inner hull. Therefore, the outer hull may be breached, i.e., opened to the sea, while the cargo would remain securely contained within the inner hull. Thereby, a potential cargo spill will have been avoided. Typical cargos that have spilled in the past to cause environmental mishaps include cargos such as an oil, a petroleum, a chemical, or other hazardous materials. Of course the provision of a double hull adds to the complexity and cost of new construction. “METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF DOUBLE HULL PROTECTION”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,218,919, issued on Jun. 15, 1993, Krulikowski et al. describes the construction of an auxiliary hull, exterior to the primary hull of a ship, which has the capacity to absorb impact energy preventing primary hull puncture, which may be retrofitted to existing single hull ships. However, this external fitting of a new auxiliary hull outside the existing single hull to form a double hull is costly and significantly changes the operational characteristics of the vessel. The breadth and draft of the ship are changed as a result of this external double hulling. This affects the ports that the vessel may access and the port interface characteristics of the vessel. Additionally, as is the case of a vessel with a pushing notch, an external double hulling will change the tugboat interface. External double hulling also affects the wave and wind characteristics of the vessel. In addition, the cargo carrying capabilities of the vessel may be affected, which in turn may affect the customers that may be serviced by a particular vessel.




Therefore a need exists for the rebuild of an existing single hull vessel with a new double hull. Preferably, this double hulling maintains the external shape and dimensions of the outer hull so that the vessel's hull performance and operational characteristics remain substantially the same.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a double hull vessel (particularly a seal going vessel) and a method of internally rebuilding an existing vessel having a single hull design into a vessel having a double hull design. The present invention accomplishes the installation of the new double hull using an internal rebuild concept. The present invention reuses the existing vessel structure to the maximum extent possible, while also maintaining, as much as possible, the cargo carrying and hull operational characteristics of the original vessel. The shape and dimensions of the outer hull of the vessel and the hull performance characteristics of the vessel remain substantially the same, and the existing internal ship structure, including the longitudinal bulkheads, the transverse bulkheads, and top side decking are removed, modified, and reused to the maximum extent possible.




The outer hull of the existing single hull vessel and a new inner hull, which is disposed within a volume defined by the outer hull, define the double hull of the rebuilt vessel. A plurality of framing members are disposed between the inner hull structure and the outer hull and maintain the inner hull in a spaced apart relationship with the outer hull. The new inner hull defines an interior cargo carrying volume and the outer hull defines an exterior of the rebuilt vessel, such that the inner hull provides a boundary in the event that the outer hull is penetrated.




Preferably, the new inner hull structure which forms the new inner hull of the double hull vessel is prefabricated as a plurality of modular sections, and the prefabricated modules are fitted over the top of the existing bottom framing members and joined to the existing framing members at the sides. The prefabricated modules comprise portions of the inner hull plating including the inner bottom plating, port side plating, and starboard side plating, and a plurality of framing members. The framing members include stiffening, members and connecting members. In one preferred embodiment, the connecting members include a plurality of transverse framing members and the stiffening members include a plurality of longitudinal framing members. Alternatively, the connecting membersmay include a plurality of longitudinal framing members and the stiffening members may include a plurality of transverse framing members. The connecting members are connected at one end to an exterior surface of the inner hull structure and extending therefrom and are connected at the other end to the outer hull structure.




The new portions of the primary framing members of the modular sections extend from the inner bottom plating a shorter distance than the new portions of the connecting members, thereby forming a gap when the module is installed over the existing framing. This gap helps facilitate fitting up and welding of each modular section to the existing outer hull structure. The removed internal ship structure and topside deck is modified and then reinstalled over the new inner hull after the inner hull has been installed. Thus, the cargo is primarily contained by new steel (the inner hull), and the exterior structure and coating of the original vessel's hull define the outer hull of the vessel.




Accordingly, a single hull vessel is rebuilt to have a double hull over at least the entire side and bottom within the length of the cargo carrying volume, while substantially maintaining the major outer hull exterior dimensions and hull hydrodynamic characteristics of the original single hull vessel.




In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a new trunk structure is disposed over the opening formed in the topside deck plating when the cut out section of deck plating was removed. The trunk structure includes topside deck (main deck) plating, preferably the existing decking that was cut and removed, and new bulkheads, extending down therefrom. The trunk bulkheads are formed between the cut in the original main deck, in the area where the original topside deck plating and bulkheads were raised to maintain cargo carrying capacity. Preferably, where a new trunk structure is employed, new bulkhead portions are connected to the existing longitudinal and transverse bulkheads to form rebuilt bulkheads. These bulkhead portions are preferably formed as lower bulkhead portions proximate the inner hull to strengthen the rebuilt bulkheads and to provide additional support and strength for the new raised deck and trunk structure. Preferably, new lower portions of the transverse and longitudinal bulkhead are formed extending upward from an inner surface of the new inner hull plating. The trunk structure may be sized to increase or decrease the cargo carrying capacity.




Additional features of the present invention are set forth below.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings an exemplary embodiment that is presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:





FIGS. 1A and 1B

show a side view and a top plan view, respectively, of an exemplary single hull vessel for double hull rebuild in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2A

shows a side view of the vessel of

FIG. 1

illustrating with dashed lines the cut lines for removal of the existing internal vessel structure and topside decking;





FIG. 2B

shows a plan view of the cut lines of

FIG. 2A

;





FIG. 2C

shows a cross-sectional view taking along line


2


C—


2


C of

FIG. 2B

showing the cut lines;





FIG. 3

shows a perspective, exploded view of an exemplary inner hull structure of the present invention;





FIG. 4

shows a detail view of an exemplary port modular section and an exemplary starboard modular section of the inner hull structure of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5A

is a perspective view of a rebuilt vessel having a double hull and a raised trunk structure according to the present invention;





FIG. 5B

is a perspective cross-sectional view taken along line


5


B—


5


B of

FIG. 5A

;





FIG. 5C

is a cross-sectional detail view taken along line


5


B—


5


B of

FIG. 5A

;





FIG. 5D

is a cross-sectional view taken along line


5


B—


5


B of

FIG. 5A

illustrating the inner hull structure of the new double hull and the raised trunk structure.





FIG. 6A

is a detailed end view of an exemplary connection of the inner hull structure to the outer hull of FIG.


5


C and

FIG. 5D

;





FIG. 6B

is a detailed side view of the connection of

FIG. 6A

;





FIG. 7

is a perspective, exploded view of the bulkheads that form the trunk structure;





FIG. 8

is an exploded view showing the various plate assemblies; and





FIG. 9

is an exploded, midship sectional view showing the new double hull, trunk structure and raised deck.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A rebuilt double hull vessel and method of vessel construction/rebuild that solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art and provides other beneficial features in accordance with the presently preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described below with reference to

FIGS. 1-9

. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the description given herein with respect to those figures is for explanatory purposes only and is not intended in any way to limit the scope of the invention. Throughout the following detailed description similar reference numbers refer to similar elements in all the figures of the drawings.




The vessel and method of internal double hull rebuild are described in reference to a rebuild, conversion, and/or retrofit of an existing oil, or petroleum, or chemical carrying vessel, but it is contemplated that the invention is applicable to other types of vessels as well, and is not limited to the particular vessel embodiments shown. For example, the invention contemplates the use of other vessel types, such as ships and barges for the transportation of liquid, granular, and gaseous cargos, as well as other vessel structures, different methods of coupling various parts of the vessel together, and the use of various materials for the construction/rebuild of the vessel.




The present invention is directed to a rebuilt double hull vessel and method of rebuilding an existing vessel


1


having a single outer hull


2


into a rebuilt vessel


5


having a double hull


4


. This vessel and method of internal double hulling results in a “ship within a ship” like construction. More specifically, it is directed to a rebuilt double hull vessel


5


having a new inner hull


6


that is adapted to be fitted inside the volume defined by the outer hull


2


and to be coupled to the outer hull


2


of an existing vessel


1


thereby forming a double hull


4


. The double hull


4


includes an inner hull


6


formed by an inner hull structure


3


and an exterior or outer hull


2


defined by the original hull


2


of the existing vessel


1


. The inner hull


6


defines an interior cargo carrying volume


12


and the outer hull


2


defines an exterior of the rebuilt vessel


5


. The inner hull structure


3


allows for the internal rebuild of an existing single hull vessel


1


into a double hull vessel


5


while at the same time maintaining the original outer or exterior hull material, exterior hull shape, exterior hull dimensions, and exterior hull performance characteristics. The new inner hull structure


3


is also adapted for forming a connection to the original internal vessel structure


7


.




The present invention is also directed to a new method of internal double hulling wherein the outer hull


2


of an existing vessel


1


is rebuilt internally from a single hull to a double hull


4


. The method of double hull rebuild includes the steps of removing substantially all of the existing internal structure


7


proximate the cargo section


12


(herein after also referred to as cargo carrying volume) of the vessel


1


, inserting a new inner hull structure


3


within the volume defined by the existing outer hull


2


, thereby forming an inner hull


6


of a double hull


4


, and then reinstalling the modified existing internal vessel structure


7


over the new inner hull


6


.




By rebuilding the hull from the inside out, the same outer hull shape and dimensions of the original single hull vessel are maintained. This is important for several reasons. By maintaining the same outer hull shape and dimensions, the wind and wave performance characteristics of the vessel are essentially the same after the rebuild as they were prior to the rebuild The vessel interface with port facilities and tugboats are maintained. Also, the new inner hull


6


having new metal and surface coatings is used to hold the cargo. The existing hull


2


, which is already proven to be seaworthy, to have the proper structural, stiffness, and the proper corrosion coating required for a seawater environment, is still on the outside or exterior of the new double hull


4


. This method of internal double hulling allows the vessel to also maintain essentially the same beam characteristics. This allows the same ports to be accessed by the vessel, and the same customers to be serviced after the rebuild that were serviced prior to the rebuild.




The double hull


4


extends over at least the entire outer shell plating


18


(e.g., outer bottom plating


9


, outer port side plating


10


and outer starboard side plating


11


) within the length of the cargo carrying section


12


of the double hull vessel


5


in order to protect the cargo from spillage in case of penetration of the outer hull


2


. The existing internal structure


7


that was removed may be modified such that the topside decking


13


that was removed is adapted to be reconnected to the topside decking


13


that was left in place, or preferably, a trunk structure


53


is added between the topside decking


13




b


that was left in place and the topside decking


13




a


that was removed to maintain the cargo carrying capacity of the double hull vessel


5


substantially the same as that of the single hull vessel


1


. Preferably the trunk structure


53


has a height sufficient to prevent a loss in the cargo carrying capacity, although the trunk structure


53


may be designed to increase, decrease, or maintain the cargo carrying capacity.




The present invention allows for the installation of a double hull


4


into an existing vessel


1


having a single hull design and has the advantages of maximizing the amount of existing structure that is reused in the rebuild construction. In addition, the present invention provides for prefabrication of the material and structure of the new inner hull


6


. Preferably the inner hull structure


3


is prefabricated into a plurality of modular sections


15


to reduce the repair time. This rebuild or retrofit process saves a substantial amount of time and money due to the fact that the original vessel's hull


2


and internal structure


7


is reused. Also, the present invention provides a level of confidence in the operation and performance of the rebuilt double hull vessel


5


due to the fact that the design and seaworthiness of the outer hull


2


of the rebuilt double hull vessel


5


has already been proven in-service.





FIGS. 1A and 1B

show a typical single hull vessel


1


. As shown, the single hull vessel


1


includes a stem section


16


, a bow section


17


, and a cargo canying section


12


located midships between the stern section


16


and the bow section


17


, as are conventional. The stern section


16


and bow section


17


typically include main propulsion systems, mechanical systems, electrical systems, cargo and ship handling equipment, crew living quarters, and the like as are conventional.




As shown in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, a single exterior or outer hull


2


extends the length of the vessel


1


from the stern


16


to the bow


17


. The outer hull


2


is formed of outer shell plating


18


including outer bottom plating


9


, outer port side plating


10


, and outer starboard side plating


11


. Top side deck plating


13


extends laterally across the top edges


19


of the side plating


10


,


11


from the stern


16


to the bow


17


. One or more cargo carrying sections


12


are typically formed midships between the bow section


16


and the stern section


17


. The cargo section


12


defines the cargo carrying volume of the vessel and may be divided transversely by one or more transverse bulkheads


20


and/or longitudinally by one or more longitudinal bulkheads


21


. These bulkheads


20


,


21


are watertight solid structures that divide the cargo section


12


of the vessel


1


into one or more tanks which physically separate the cargo.




As shown in

FIG. 2C

, the outer hull's


2


shell plating


18


is supported and strengthened by a plurality of outer framing members


22


and bulkheads


20


,


21


. These outer frames


22


and bulkheads


20


,


21


typically include outer longitudinal frames


23


and bulkheads


21


that run generally fore and aft (lengthwise), and outer transverse frames


24


and bulkheads


20


that run generally port to starboard (side to side).




The outer framing members


22


typically include a first leg


47


and a second leg


48


. The first leg


47


extends from the interior planar surface


8


of the outer shell plating


18


in a plane substantially perpendicular to the interior planar surface


8


. The second leg


48


extends transversely in relation to the first leg


47


and forms a plane that is substantially parallel to the interior planar surface


8


of the outer shell plating


18


. For example,

FIGS. 6A and 6B

show a typically outer transverse framing


24


that includes I-beam type framing wherein the first leg


47


is a web, and the second leg


48


is a flange. The outer longitudinal framing


23


typically includes angle bar type framing, as is conventional The outer framing members


22


may comprise web frames which are not solid structures, but rather have passages (not shown) formed therein which allow the cargo or contents of a tank to flow through the web framing member.





FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C show dashed lines that illustrate preferred cut lines


25


for an exemplary single hull vessel


1


that will be rebuilt into a double hull vessel


5


. The cut lines


25


show a preferred location for cutting and removing the existing internal vessel structure


7


from the existing single hull


1


in preparation for installing the new inner hull


6


inside the original outer hull


2


to form the double hull


4


. As shown, a cut


25


is preferably made along the existing hull


1


around the perimeter of the cargo carrying section


12


(e.g., the top, bottom, sides, and ends of the cargo carrying section). As shown in

FIGS. 2B and 2C

, a cut


25




a


is preferably made in the topside plating


13


in an area above the cargo section


12


proximate the outer perimeter of the topside deck plating


13


(e.g., longitudinally along the port side


10


, transversely along the forward end


26


of the cargo section


12


, longitudinally along the starboard side


11


, and transversely along the after end


27


of the cargo section


12


). An opening is formed in the topside deck plating


13


once the cut out section of the topside deck plating is removed. As shown in

FIGS. 2 and 2C

, a cut


25




b


is also made proximate the outer port side plating


10


, outer starboard side plating


11


, and outer bottom plating


9


, and along both the transverse


20


and the longitudinal


21


bulkheads. The cut


25




b


preferably follows the contour of the outer hull


2


and is made near the transverse


24


and longitudinal


23


framing of the outer hull


2


. The cuts


25


are made using conventional techniques.




As shown in

FIG. 2A

, the cut internal vessel structure


7


is then removed from the outer hull


2


using conventional lifting techniques. Preferably, the internal vessel structure


7


is cut into a plurality of sections


7




a


to help facilitate removal of the internal vessel structure


7


from the shell of the outer hull


2


, as shown in

FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C. The internal vessel structure


7


may be cut into sections


7




a


in the longitudinal direction, the transverse direction, or both. The number of sections


7




a


that the internal vessel structure


7


is cut into is preferably predetermined taking into account several factors, including the type of vessel, the size of the vessel, a maximum number of sections that helps facilitate removal of the sections from the existing outer hull, the crane capacity for lifting, and a minimum number of sections that helps facilitate reinstallation of the sections back into the new inner hull. After the cut sections


7




a


are lifted out, the sections


7




a


are modified so that they may be reinstalled over and connected to the new inner hull


6


. This modification of the removed internal vessel structure


7


is preferably performed off-site.




As shown in

FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C, most of the topside decking


13


and internal vessel structure


7


of the cargo section


12


is cut and removed from the shell of the outer hull


2


.

FIG. 2C

shows a simplified cross-sectional view of the midship cargo section


12


of the vessel


1


, looking aft, and showing the configuration of the vessel prior to being cut apart. The left half is a section forward of a typical web frame while the right half is a section forward of a typical transverse bulkhead.

FIG. 2C

additionally shows schematically the placement of the external vessel structure


40


, including the outer shell plating


18


, the outer transverse flaming


24


, and the outer longitudinal framing


23


. The external vessel structure


40


remains in place in the outer hull


2


in the area of the cargo section


12


after the cuts


25


have been completed. In addition, other ship systems (not shown) that run through or are contained in the cargo section


12


of the vessel


1


may be left intact, provided that they do not interfere with the installation of the new inner hull


6


. The existing external structure


40


on the topside deck plating


13


, outer bottom plating


9


, and outer side plating


10


,


11


of the vessel


1


that was cut and remains in place is adapted to receive and be connected to the new inner hull


6


. This external vessel structure


40


is adapted using conventional techniques.





FIG. 3

shows the new inner hull


6


that will be inserted inside the shell plating


18


of the outer hull


2


to rebuild an existing single hull vessel


1


into a double hull vessel


5


. Once installed within the volume defined by the outer hull


2


, the inner hull


6


defines an interior cargo carrying volume


12


and the outer hull


2


defines an exterior of the rebuilt vessel


5


. The inner hull


6


includes an inner hull structure


3


including inner hull shell plating


28


and inner framing members


32


. The inner shell plating


28


including inner bottom plating


29


, inner port side plating


30


, and inner starboard side plating


31


. Preferably, the new inner hull structures also comprises a plurality of inner framing members


32


that include a plurality of inner connecting members


33


and a plurality of inner stiffening members


34


that are disposed between the inner hull structure


3


and the outer hull


2


. The inner hull structure


3


may also comprise lower bulkhead portions


55


, as will be discussed further below. The new inner hull


6


is adapted to be disposed within and connected to the inside of the outer hull


2


, adapted to receive the cut and removed internal vessel structure


7


, and also to accommodate and fit up with existing shipboard systems and equipment (not shown). In addition, piping or equipment of various vessel systems (not shown) may be included on the new inner hull structure


3


as required.




The volume defined by the spaced apart area between the outer hull


2


and the inner hull


6


preferably forms a space


38


that may be used as tanks for the rebuilt double hull vessel


5


, including ballasting tanks or the like. The new ballast spaces


38


may be used to optimize vessel trim and heel, to provide additional propeller immersion, or to minimize wind and weather sensitivity. Additionally, this feature has importance for single hull vessels


1


that carry segregated ballast. After a single hull vessel


1


having segregated ballast tanks has been rebuilt into a double hull vessel


5


, the majority of the segregated ballast tanks may be converted to cargo tanks, thus increasing the cargo volume capacity. This increased cargo volume capacity results from the fact that space


38


created by the formation of the double hull


4


may serve as ballast tanks providing ample volume for ballast, and since the segregated ballast tanks are no longer necessary for the carrying of ballast, they may carry cargo.




As shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, the new inner hull


6


is preferably constructed and installed as a plurality of prefabricated modular sections


15


. These individual modular sections


15


are constructed at yard level, transported to the vessel


1


, lifted into the interior of the outer hull


2


, laid on top of the existing external vessel structure


40


that was left in place after the cut, aligned with the external vessel structure


40


that was left in place and adjacent modular sections


15


, and integrated with the external vessel structure


40


and adjacent modular sections


15


, as shown in

FIGS. 5C

,


6


A, and


6


B. The modular sections


15


of the new inner hull structure


3


are connected together and to the external vessel structure


40


by conventional techniques, preferably by welding. Prefabrication of the new inner hull structure


3


allows for a shorter rebuild or repair time and therefore the vessel is out of service for a shorter period of time.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, each new inner hull modular section


15


preferably includes a portion of inner bottom plating


29


and a portion of inner side plating


30


,


31


. In addition, each modular section


15


includes a plurality of inner framing members


32


extending from an exterior surface


35


of the inner shell plating


28


(e.g., the inner bottom plating


29


, inner port side plating


30


, and inner starboard side plating


31


). The size of each modular section


15


is predetermined base on several factors, including the type of vessel, the size of the vessel, a maximum number of modules


15


that helps facilitate installation of the modules


15


into the volume of the existing outer hull


2


, the crane lifting capacity, and a minimum number of modules


15


that helps facilitate the fitting up and welding of the modules


15


to the outer hull


2


.




The inner bottom plating


29


and inner port and starboard side plating


30


,


31


generally include a plurality of flat metal plate structures


42


having parallel planar surfaces. These individual flat metal plate structures


42


are coupled together to form a plurality of plate assemblies


43


. The plurality of plate assemblies


43


include bottom plating assembly


44


and side plating assembly


45


that are connected together. The corner


46


formed at the connection of the bottom plating assembly


44


and side plating assembly


45


may form a right angle or preferably comprises a joint that is formed such that the bottom and side plating assemblies


44


,


45


follow the general contour of the outer hull


2


.




Temporary bracket members (not shown) may be used to hold the inner bottom plating


29


and the inner side plating


30


,


31


constant in relation to one another during fitting and make-up of the new inner hull


6


to the existing outer hull


2


. Once the inner hull structure


3


has been connected inside the outer hull


2


, these temporary bracket members are cut off and removed.




As shown in

FIGS. 5C and 5D

, a plurality of elongated inner framing members


32


are disposed between the spaced apart inner hull


6


and outer hull


2


. As shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, the inner framing members


32


are preferably attached to the exterior surface


35


of the inner shell plating


28


in a parallel spaced relation to each other. Preferably, the framing members


32


are connected to and extend outward in a plane substantially perpendicular to a plane defined by the exterior surface


35


of the inner shell plating


28


(e.g., inner bottom plating


29


, inner port side plating


30


, and inner starboard side plating


31


). Alternatively, the framing members


32


may be installed at a predetermined angle or comprise an energy absorbing type design.




As shown, the inner framing members


32


includes inner connecting members


33


that function to hold the inner hull


6


spaced apart from the outer hull


2


, and inner stiffening members


34


that function to stiffen the planar surfaces of the inner bottom plating assembly


44


and the inner side plating assembly


45


. Preferably, the inner framing members


32


include inner longitudinal frames


36


that run generally fore and aft, and inner transverse frames


37


that run generally port to starboard thereby forming a cris-cross structure. An inner end


41


of each inner framing member


32


is coupled to the inner shell plating


28


using conventional techniques, such as welding.




In a preferred embodiment shown in

FIGS. 6A and 6B

, the inner longitudinal frames


36


are formed as continuous members and functions as the primary stiffener of the new inner shell plating


28


. In this preferred embodiment, the inner transverse frames


37


includes a plurality of chocks


70


disposed between the longitudinal frames


36


. The inner transverse frames


37


are laid onto and fitted to the outer averse frames


24


of the outer hull


2


. The distal ends


51


of the inner connecting members


33


are coupled to the outer transverse framing


24


by conventional welding techniques.




As shown in

FIGS. 6A and 6B

, a gap


49


is preferably formed at the location between where the distal ends


51


of the inner connecting members


33


(inner transverse framing


37


) land on the second legs


48


of the outer transverse framing


24


and the distal end


50


of the inner stiffening members


34


(inner longitudinal framing


36


) of the new inner hull


6


. This gap


49


assists the fitting up and welding of the new inner hull structure


3


to the existing external hull structure


40


with improved efficiencies. For example, the gap


49


allows for the use of automated processes for connecting the inner hull structure


3


to the outer hull


2


. Preferably, the gap


49


is formed by the inner transverse frames


37


of the new inner hull


6


extending a greater distance from the exterior side


35


of the inner shell plating


28


than the inner longitudinal frames


36


extend therefrom. The distal ends


51


of the inner transverse frames


37


are coupled to the second legs


48


of the outer transverse frames


24


of the existing outer hull


2


using conventional techniques.




The cut out section of topside deck plating


13




a


and internal vessel structure


7


that was cut and removed is adapted to be re-installed and connected to the new inner hull


6


and the cut portion of the topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place defining an opening in the topside decking. The topside deck plating


13




a


and internal vessel structure


7


that was cut and removed may be adapted such that the topside deck plating


13




a


that was cut and removed is reconnected to the cut topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place, forming a rebuilt topside deck that is substantially the same as the topside deck


13


of the original single hull vessel


1


, or preferably, a new trunk structure


53


is added extending between the cut


25




a


in the topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place and the topside deck plating


13




a


that was removed, resulting in a raised deck


13




d


, as shown in

FIGS. 5A

, SB, and


5


D.




As shown in

FIG. 5A

the new double hull


4


extends at least the length of the cargo carrying section


12


.

FIG. 5B

shows a cut-away perspective view of the new double hull


4


at the midship cargo section


12


.

FIGS. 5B and 5C

illustrate how the new inner hull


6


is inserted within the volume defined by the outer shell plating


18


of outer hull


2


, and also shows the outer framing members


22


, the inner framing members


32


, and the connection of the inner hull structure


3


to the outer hull


2


. The inner hull


6


defines an interior cargo carrying, volume


12


and provides a secondary boundary in the event that the outer hull


2


is penetrated.




As shown in

FIG. 5C

, the inner hull structure


3


is inserted within a volume defined by the outer shell plating


18


of the outer hull


2


, spaced apart from the outer hull


2


to form a double hull


4


. Connecting members


52


connect the inner hull


6


to the outer hull


2


in a spaced apart relationship. Preferably, connecting members


52


include outer connecting members


22




a


and inner connecting members


33


. In a preferred embodiment, outer connecting members


22




a


comprise the outer transverse framing


24


of the outer hull


2


and the inner connecting members


33


comprise the inner transverse framing


37


of the inner hull


6


. The new inner hull structure


3


is inserted internally within the existing outer framing


22


of the outer hull


2


. As shown, the inner transverse framing


37


extending from the exterior surface


35


of the inner hull


6


is coupled to the outer transverse framing


24


extending from an interior surface


8


of the outer hull


2


. Preferably, the framing members on the bottom are laid together and the framing members on the sides are lapped or butted together. The connecting members


52


are designed to hold the inner hull


6


in a spaced apart relationship with the outer hull


2


and to withstand normal hydrostatic loads (e.g., the pressures of the cargo inside the double hull


4


and the pressures of an operating environment, such as the sea, on the exterior of the double hull


4


).




Alternatively, the inner hull structure


3


and connecting members


52


may also comprise a curved plate design, a transversely framed design, transverseless framed design, an energy absorbing design, or any other suitable hull design as known in the art.





FIGS. 5A and 5B

show an exemplary double hull vessel


5


rebuilt in accordance with the present invention. The removed internal vessel structure


7


and topside deck plating


13


is reinserted and coupled to the new inner hull


6


and the remaining external vessel structure


40


by conventional techniques, preferably by welding. Weld joints


25




c


join the inner hull


6


to the outer hull


2


. The weld joints


25




c


illustrate where the inner hull structure


3


, the removed internal vessel structure


7


and topside deck plating


13


are reconnected to the remaining external vessel structure


40


. The location of the weld joints


25




c


essentially coincide with the cut lines


25




a


and


25




b.






As illustrated in the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 5A and 5B

, the new double hull vessel


5


may include a new trunk structure


53


and raised deck


13


d.

FIG. 5D

shows a cross-section taken amidship in the cargo carrying section


12


of the double hull vessel


5


. In this preferred embodiment, a trunk structure


53


is added to the internal vessel structure


7


and topside deck plating


13




a


that is removed from the vessel


1


. Preferably, the trunk structure


53


is connected to the peripheral edge of the cut out section of topside deck plating


13




a


that was removed. The trunk structure


53


is employed to minimize any loss in the cargo carrying capacity of the vessel. The trunk structure


53


is connected along and extends between the cut line


25




a


around the outer peripheral of the cut out section of topside deck plating


13




a


that was removed and the outer peripheral edge of the opening defined by the topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place. The trunk structure


53


and raised deck


13




d


define an additional volume of the cargo carrying volume


12


. The height of the trunk structure


53


is determined by the desired cargo carrying capacity for the vessel


5


. Preferably, the trunk structure


53


is sized to compensate for the height of the new inner hull


6


so that no loss in cargo carrying capacity results. In this way, the cargo carrying capacity of the double hull vessel


5


remains substantially the same as it was when the vessel was a single hull vessel


1


.




As shown in

FIG. 7

, the trunk structure


53


includes a forward trunk bulkhead


58


, an after trunk bulkhead


59


, a port trunk bulkhead


60


, and a starboard trunk bulkhead


61


. The trunk bulkheads


58


,


59


,


60


,


61


generally include a plurality of flat metal plate structures


62


having parallel planar surfaces. These individual flat metal plate structures


62


are coupled together to form a plurality of plate assemblies


63


. These plate assemblies are coupled together to form each bulkhead


58


,


59


,


60


,


61


.




Trunk framing members


64


are disposed along an inside surface


65


of each trunk bulkhead


58


,


59


,


60


,


61


. The trunk framing members include trunk stiffening members


66


and trunk connecting members


67


. Preferably the trunk stiffening members


66


comprise longitudinal framing and the bunk connecting members


67


comprise transverse framing. The trunk connecting members


67


are preferably constructed such that at least a portion


68


of each trunk connecting members


67


extends beyond a bottom edge


69


of the trunk structure


53


. This provides a stronger connection of the trunk structure


53


to the topside deck plating


13


and new inner hull


6


because the connection extends across the weld line


35




c


, as shown in

FIGS. 7 and 8

. The bulkheads of the trunk structure


53


are constructed using conventional bulkhead construction techniques.




The trunk structure


53


and raised deck


13




d


may be prefabricated as a single unit, or as a plurality of sections. Preferably, the existing topside deck plating


13




a


that was cut away and removed is used to form the raised deck


13




d


portion of the new trunk structure


53


. The existing topside deck plating


13




a


that was cut and removed may be set into an erection building or the like and temporary supports used to elevate the deck plating


13




a


while the trunk structure


53


is connected to the outer peripheral of the deck plating


13




a


. The trunk structure


53


is then installed over the inner hull


6


and topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place.




Referring back to

FIGS. 3 and 4

, where a new trunk structure


53


is employed, the inner hull structure


3


also includes new bulkhead portions


55


. These new bulkhead portions


55


compensate for the added height resulting from the raised deck


13




d


and trunk structure


53


. The new bulkhead portions


55


may be formed separate from and then coupled to the inner hull


6


, or preferably the new bulkhead portions


55


are formed integral with the inner hull structure


3


.




Preferably, the bulkhead portions


55


are disposed on the interior surface


56


of the inner hull structure


3


as lower bulkhead portions and extend upward to form lower portions of the rebuilt bulkheads


20


,


21


. This is advantageous because these lower bulkhead portions


55


may be constructed to be more robust than the existing bulkhead


20


,


21


structure thereby providing additional strength to support the extra loads due to the trunk structure


53


and the higher level of the raised deck


13




d


. Accordingly, the existing longitudinal and transverse bulkheads


23


,


24


are removed with the topside deck plating


13




a


as part of the internal vessel structure


7


so that the stronger, lower portions


55


may be added with the new inner hull structure


3


. Alternatively, it is possible to modify the existing bulkhead structure


20


,


21


to make it stronger to support the new raised deck and trunk structure


53


, or to add the new bulkhead portions at the top of the existing bulkheads to form upper bulkhead portions of the rebuilt bulkheads


20


,


21


.




Bulkhead portions


55


may comprise one or more longitudinal bulkhead portions


55




a


and/or one or more transverse bulkhead portions


55




b


depending on the design of the existing single hull vessel


1


being rebuilt. The height of that the lower bulkhead portions


55


is preferably substantially the same as the height of the raised deck and trunk structure


53


. The bulkhead portions


55


are constructed using conventional techniques for bulkhead designs.





FIG. 8

illustrates an exemplary process of how the various plate assemblies are connected together. The corner


46


plate assembly is coupled to the bottom plate assembly


44


. One or more side plate assemblies


45


is coupled to the corner


46


plate assembly, and the trunk side plate assembly


60


is coupled to the upper side plate assembly


45


. Lower bulkhead portions


55


, including longitudinal bulkhead portions


55




a


and transverse bulkhead portions


55




b


, are coupled to an interior surface


56


of the inner hull


6


.

FIG. 9

shows a midship sectional of how the trunk structure


53


and raised deck


13




d


fit over the completed double hull


4


.




The present invention also provides a method of vessel construction, and particularly, a method of internal double hulling of an existing single hull vessel. The method of the present invention, generally comprises the steps of:




1. Cutting the existing internal structure


7


of the existing single hull vessel


1


proximate the outer bottom


9


, outer port side


10


, and outer starboard side


11


of the outer hull


2


up to and including the main or topside deck plating


13


along the port


10


and starboard


11


sides and along the stern


16


and bow


17


areas of the vessel


1


(e.g., around the perimeter of the cargo carrying section


12


). Preferably the internal structure


7


is cut into one or more sections


7




a


to facilitate the removal of each the sections


7




a


of internal structure


7


. Also, the cut lines


25


are preferably made so that the existing hull outer longitudinal framing


23


and outer transverse framing


24


is left in place on the outer bottom


9


and outer sides


10


,


11


of the existing outer hull


2


.




2. Lifting the cut sections


7




a


out of the shell plating


18


of the existing outer hull


2


. Preferably these cut sections


7




a


are lifted from a point of attachment proximate the main deck


13


area and are lifted up and out of the existing hull outer shell


18


or skin. After these cut sections


7




a


of existing internal structure


7


have been removed, they may either be repaired and/or refurbished in place or preferably at a separate repair facility.




3. Prefabricating the new inner hull structure


3


. The shape of the new inner hull


6


generally conforms to the shape of the existing outer hull


2


and the inner hull


6


is adapted for connection to the existing external hull structure


40


that was left in place after the cuts.




Preferably, the new inner hull structure


3


is prefabricated in a plurality of modular sections


15


to help facilitate lifting, installation, and fitting of the new inner hull


6


to the existing outer hull


2


structure. Preferably, the new inner hull modules


15


are fabricated from a plurality of flat metal structures


42


or steel plates that are cut and welded to form a plurality of plate or panel assemblies


43


. The plurality of panel assemblies


43


are then connected to form bottom plate assemblies


44


and side plate assemblies


45


of the modules


15


. The new modules preferably comprise a plurality of flat sheets of metal


42


that are integrated and coupled together to form the new inner hull shell plating


28


. Inner transverse


37


and inner longitudinal


36


framing members are coupled to the exterior surface


35


of the flat metal plate assemblies


43


of the inner shell plating


28


and are preferably fabricated to conform to and match up with the existing framing members


22


of the existing outer hull


2


. In addition, a plurality of bulkhead portions


55


may be formed on the interior surface


56


extending outward therefrom.




4. Installing and coupling the modular sections


15


of the inner hull structure


3


into place on the existing outer hull structure


40


to form a double hull


4


. This step of installing the inner hull structure


3


inside the outer hull


2


includes the additional steps of laying the inner hull structure


3


inside the outer hull


2


and then coupling the inner hull


6


to the outer hull


2


. Preferably the new inner hull structure


3


is coupled to the existing outer hull


2


by welding. The inner connecting framing members


33


extending outward from the exterior surface


35


of the inner bottom plating


29


of the new inner hull


6


are laid on the outer framing


22


extending outward from the interior surface


8


of the outer hull


2


and then the connecting framing members are welded together. The inner connecting framing members


33


extending outward from the exterior surface


35


of the inner port side plating


30


and inner starboard side plating


31


of the inner hull


6


are lapped onto the outer connecting sing


22


extending outward from the interior surface


8


of the port and starboard sides of the outer hull


2


and the connecting framing members are welded together.




5. Modifying the existing internal vessel structure


7


and decking


13


of the vessel


1


that was cut and removed to conform to the new double hull


4


. This comprises adapting the sections


7




a


that were cut and removed for re-connection with the inner hull


6


.




In a preferred embodiment, a trunk structure


53


is added between the cut


25


in the topside deck plating


13




a


that was removed and the topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place. Preferably, this trunk structure


53


includes a bulkhead that is prefabricated and extends substantially downward from the outer peripheral edge of the main deck plating


13




b


that was cut away and removed. When the internal structure


7


and topside deck plating


13




b


having the trunk structure


53


is re-installed into the inner hull


6


, the trunk structure


53


forms a raised bulkhead on the main deck between the cut lines


25


. The height of the new bulkhead section of the trunk structure


53


is predetermined based on the desired cargo carrying capacity of the completed double hull vessel


5


.




Alternatively, the existing internal vessel structure may be re-installed without a trunk structure


53


such that the topside deck plating


13




a


that was removed and the topside deck plating


13




b


that was left in place are re-connected at the cut line


25


.




6. Installing the modified/adapted internal ship structure


7


and the original main deck plating


13




b


that was cut and removed into the inner hull


6


of the double hull


4


.




7. Coupling the modified internal ship structure


7


and the original main deck plating


13




b


that was cut and removed to the shell plating


28


of the inner hull


6


of the double hull


4


and the external structure


40


of the original hull


1


that was left in place.




8. Modifying the vessel's mechanical, electrical, cargo, and structural systems as required to allow for operation with the new double hull


4


, and for a raised deck in those embodiments having a trunk structure


53


.




The following is an example of the practice of the present invention on a barge. Application of the invention employed as much of the existing barge as possible to smoothly integrate it with the entirely new inner hull structure


3


and the new trunk structure


53


. A detailed inside measurement was performed to detect changes from the design to “as-built.” From these measurements, substantial modular


15


pre-assembly of the inner hull structure


3


was completed before the barge arrived in the yard. When the vessel arrived, the topside deck


13


and internal vessel structure


7


were cut into five large sections


7




a


. These sections


7




a


, with their attached transverse and longitudinal bulkheads


20


,


21


, were removed and stored separately.




The prefabricated modular sections


15


were laid on top of the existing bottom transverse frames


24


and lapped onto the frames


24


at the side. Forward and aft, where the barge has more shape, the plating and modules


15


were installed in smaller increments. Because most of the original main deck


13


and bulkheads


20


,


21


were being raised to create a trunk deck structure


53


, new lower portions


55


of the transverse and longitudinal bulkheads


20


,


21


were fabricated and fitted. The new bulkhead portions


55


were added on the new inner hull structure


3


and formed the bottom portion of the new extended rebuilt bulkheads thereby providing additional strength at the bottom of the bulkhead to support the extra load due to the higher level of the raised deck


13




d


. While the work was going on inside, the new side walls of the raised trunk


53


were fitted to the original deck


13


and bulkheads


20


,


21


. Finally, the completed deck and upper bulkhead assembly or trunk structure


53


was installed inside the new inner hull


6


of the double hull


4


.




The cargo carrying volume of the original barge was maintained approximately the same by raising a trunk structure


53


from the original main deck


13


and using the existing structure to the maximum extent possible. The resulting rebuilt double hull vessel


5


thus resembles newly built double hull vessels, at a substantial cost savings as compared to the cost of new construction.




The art is well aware of procedures for cutting apart pre-existing vessels and inserting new hull sections and equipment. Essentially similar techniques of cutting and welding may be employed to carry out the invention Similarly, methods of revising the vessel's cargo and ballast piping to allow suitable flow of oil and water into its various tanks, and of its wiring and control systems, are well within the knowledge of those skilled of the art.




According to the present invention, a conventional single hull vessel


1


may be internally rebuilt as a double hull vessel


5


having a double hull


4


extending at least over the length of the cargo carrying section


12


of the vessel. The new inner hull structure


3


spaces the cargo carrying tanks


12


from the outer hull


2


or skin of the vessel, thereby protecting against cargo spillage in the event of penetration of the sides and/or bottom of the outer hull


2


due to collision or grounding damage. The existing outer shell plating


18


of the vessel forms the skin of the outer hull


2


of the double hull


4


and the inner shell plating


28


of the new inner hull


6


forms the skin of the inner hull


6


of the double hull


4


.




Preferably, the relative exterior proportions of the vessel prior to and after rebuild are relatively the same. In a first embodiment, the exterior shape and outer hull dimensions of the hull and topside decking remain relatively the same and the cargo carrying capacity is reduced by the addition of the new inner hull structure


3


, while in the preferred embodiment, the exterior shape and outer hull dimensions remain relatively the same, but the topside decking is rebuilt with a trunk structure


53


(e.g., the main deck and superstructure of the vessel are modified), which allows the cargo carrying capacity to remain relatively the same.




The present invention provides a double hull vessel from an existing single hull vessel at a fraction of the cost of construction of a new vessel. The cost of the rebuild is estimated to be attractive with respect to the cost of construction of a new double-hulled vessel of comparable capacity. Obviously the economics of internally rebuilding any particular vessel will vary, particularly in dependence on the anticipated economic useful life of the rebuilt vessel.




While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications can be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A double hull vessel comprising:an outer hull of an existing single hull vessel; an inner hull internally fitted in spaced apart relationship with said outer hull; a plurality of connecting members disposed between and connecting said inner hull to said outer hull; wherein said outer hull and said inner hull form a double hull of a rebuilt double hull vessel and wherein said outer hull of said double hull of said rebuilt double hull vessel maintains the same outer hull shape and outer hull dimensions as said outer hull of said existing single hull vessel, wherein said inner hull is connected to said outer hull using a transversely framed design.
  • 2. The double hull vessel of claim 1 wherein said inner hull extends over at least a cargo carrying section of said double hull vessel.
  • 3. The double hull vessel of claim 1 wherein said double hull vessel is adapted for carrying one or more of a liquid cargo, a granular cargo, and a gaseous cargo.
  • 4. A method of rebuilding an existing single vessel to form an internally rebuilt double hull vessel comprising the steps of:providing an existing single hull vessel having an outer hull; cutting an opening in said existing single hull vessel; removing an existing internal vessel structure through said opening in said existing single hull vessel; installing a new inner hull through said opening and over said existing outer hull; connecting said new inner hull to said existing outer hull; reinstalling said removed existing internal vessel structure through said opening in said existing single hull vessel; and closing said opening in said existing single hull vessel.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein said step of cutting an opening in said existing single hull vessel further comprises cutting an opening in a topside deck plating of said existing single hull vessel.
  • 6. The method of claim 4 wherein said method further comprises the step of forming a double hull of a rebuilt double hull vessel including said outer hull and said inner hull, and maintaining an outer hull shape and outer hull dimensions of said outer hull of said double hull of said rebuilt double hull vessel the same as an outer hull shape and outer hull dimensions of said outer hull of said existing single hull vessel.
  • 7. The method of claim 4 wherein said method further comprises the step of connecting said inner hull to said outer hull using a transversely framed design.
  • 8. The method of claim 4 wherein said step of reinstalling further comprises connecting said removed existing internal vessel structure to said inner hull.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of 09/289,031, filed Apr. 9, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No 6,170,420, which claims priority to provisional application 60/112,394, filed Dec. 15, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (18)
Number Name Date Kind
3399645 Dahan Sep 1968 A
3574921 Fiegel et al. Apr 1971 A
3590466 Moshammer et al. Jul 1971 A
3742889 Weise et al. Jul 1973 A
3797099 Myers Mar 1974 A
3811593 Bridges et al. May 1974 A
4230061 Roberts et al. Oct 1980 A
4267789 Ivanov et al. May 1981 A
4548154 Murata et al. Oct 1985 A
4573422 Murata et al. Mar 1986 A
4660491 Murata et al. Apr 1987 A
4674430 Murata et al. Jun 1987 A
4907524 Hart et al. Mar 1990 A
5090351 Goldbach et al. Feb 1992 A
5189975 Zednik et al. Mar 1993 A
5218919 Krulikowski, III et al. Jun 1993 A
5542365 Jurisich et al. Aug 1996 A
6170420 Hagner et al. Jan 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2 719 545 Oct 1995 FR
61-24685 Feb 1986 JP
61-24686 Feb 1986 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Maritrans Inc. Annual Report, 1997.
Company Press Release, Sep. 8, 1997: “Maritrans Inc. Will Seek Shipyard Bids For Pilot Double-Hull Retrofit Project,” Internet: http://biz.yahoo.com.
Maritrans Signal, “A View From The Top: We'd Like to Thank 536 of the Most Environmentally Caring People in the World,” by Stephen van Dyck, Fall 1998, pp. 1. 12, and 13.
“Firm Rebuilds Shipping Barge,” Business and Finance Section of The Tampa Tribune, Nov. 7, 1998.
“Maritrans Completes First Double-Hull Barge Retrofit,” News Log, Nov. 1998, pp. 19, 20, 22.
“Maritrans Is Making Waves,” Great Ships of 1998, Maritime Reporter/Engineering News, pp. 26, 28, 44.
Letter from D. Jones to Penn Maritime re “Internal Double Hulling of the Morania No. 460,” dated Dec. 6, 1996.
Drawing, “Midbody Scantling Details,” Schuller & Allan, Inc., Oct 12, 1996.
Drawing, “Scantling Arrangement” Schuller & Allan, Inc., undated.
Drawing, “Revised & New Ballast Piping System” Schuller & Allan, Inc., Oct. 13, 1996.
Drawing, “Cargo Piping Modifications” Schuller & Allan, Inc., Oct 26, 1996.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/112394 Dec 1998 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/289031 Apr 1999 US
Child 09/689420 US