This disclosure relates generally to the field of user interface devices and, in particular, to touch sensor devices.
One type of touch sensor device operates by way of capacitance sensing utilizing capacitance sensors. The capacitance detected by a capacitance sensor changes as a function of the proximity of a conductive object to the sensor. The conductive object can be, for example, a stylus or a user's finger. In a touch sensor device, a change in capacitance detected by each sensor in the X and Y dimensions of the sensor array due to the proximity or movement of a conductive object can be measured by a variety of methods. Regardless of the method, usually an electrical signal representative of the capacitance detected by each capacitive sensor is processed by a processing device, which in turn produces electrical or optical signals representative of the position of the conductive object in relation to the touch sensor pad or touch sensor screen in the X and Y dimensions. A touch sensor strip, slider, or button operates on the same capacitance sensing principle.
One type of touch sensor device operates on a principle known as self capacitance. Self capacitance refers to the capacitance between one electrode of a touch sensor device and ground. A number of self capacitance sensor devices may be arranged in a matrix to form a touch-sensor pad. As the size of the matrix increases, the number of self capacitance sensors increases along with the number of measurements for determining the presence of a conductive object. The increased number of measurements takes a longer amount of time to perform. The speed of the measurements can be increased by sampling the sensors in parallel, however, not all self capacitance sensors can support parallel sensing.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
The following description sets forth numerous specific details such as examples of specific systems, components, methods, and so forth, in order to provide a good understanding of several embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, that at least some embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known components or methods are not described in detail or are presented in simple block diagram format in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention. Thus, the specific details set forth are merely exemplary. Particular implementations may vary from these exemplary details and still be contemplated to be within the scope of the present invention.
Embodiments of a method and apparatus for detecting an input to a capacitive sensor are described. In one embodiment, the sensor elements of a TX-RX capacitive sensor include at least one transmit (TX) electrode and at least one receive (RX) electrode. Each of the sensor elements, including the transmit and receive electrodes, has a parasitic capacitance CP and a mutual capacitance CM. The parasitic capacitance of a sensor element is the capacitance between the sensor element and ground. The mutual capacitance of the sensor element is the capacitance between the sensor element and other sensor elements.
In one embodiment, a capacitance sensing circuit detects an input at the capacitive sensor by detecting a change in the capacitance of a sensor element. For example, a finger placed near a sensor element may cause a change in the capacitance of the sensor element. The magnitude of this change in capacitance can be detected and converted to a voltage level or a digital code that can be processed by a computer or other suitable circuit or device.
In one embodiment, for a mutual capacitive sensor having transmit and receive electrodes, a signal applied to a transmit electrode induces a current at a receive electrode due to capacitive coupling between the transmit and receive electrodes. The magnitude of the current induced at the receive electrode depends on the degree of capacitive coupling between the electrodes. The proximity of an object, such as a finger, near the electrodes may change the capacitance between the electrodes, as well as the capacitance between the electrodes and ground. This change in turn affects the amount of current induced at the receive electrode. Thus, the magnitude of the induced current reflects the change in capacitance of the transmit and receive electrodes due to the input. A charge based on the induced current is stored in a charge storage circuit, which may include a quasi-differential channel with two integration capacitors.
When a conductive object, such as a finger, approaches the intersection between the transmit electrode 112 and the receive electrode 114, the conductive object causes a decrease in capacitance CM between the electrodes. The transmit electrode 112 may be either a row or a column in the sensor matrix with the receive electrode 114 being the other of a row and a column. In one embodiment, the sensor matrix can be part of an Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) touch sensor device, although other suitable types of touch sensor devices can be used. The induced current waveform at the receive electrode 114 is modified by the change in capacitance and that change is rectified by the demodulation circuit 100. In one embodiment, the demodulation circuit includes current conveyor 102, synchronous detect block 104 and charge storage circuit 106.
The receive electrode 114 of the mutual capacitance sensor is coupled to a low impedance input (X) of a current conveyor 102. In one embodiment, the current conveyor 102 comprises a current conveyor type two (CCII) or other appropriate type of circuit or device, such as, for example, a suitable configuration of operation amplifiers. The current conveyor 102 receives a voltage supply signal at a high impedance input (Y). In one embodiment, the voltage supply signal is received from reference voltage generator 230. Reference voltage generator 230 may be controlled by a control signal VREF. The current conveyor 102 mirrors the voltage supply received at the input Y to the input X. The current conveyor 102 holds the voltage level at the input X at a constant voltage level (VX), regardless of the current (Ix) induced at that terminal. In one embodiment, the voltage level VX may be VCC/2 (e.g., 2.5 V). Maintaining the receive electrode 114 at a constant voltage VX prevents the current Ix from being influenced by the parasitic capacitance Cp between the electrodes 112, 114 and ground.
As the transmit driver circuit 120 pulls the voltage VC1 on the transmit electrode 112 to VCC, the current Ix flows from VC1 through the mutual capacitance CM to VX and into the input X of the current conveyor 102. Conversely, when the voltage VC1 is pulled to ground, the current Ix is reversed, flowing from a source in the input X of the current conveyor 102. The current conveyor 102 senses the current Ix and mirrors the current at a bipolar output IZ+. In one embodiment, when the current Ix is sourced at input X, an output current is also sourced at output IZ+. Likewise, when the current Ix is sinked in input X, the output current is sinked at output IZ+. Output IZ− of current conveyor 102 inverts the current at IZ+, and may be used in some embodiments.
The output current from IZ+, passes through a synchronous detect block 104. In one embodiment, the synchronous detect block 104 includes switches 207 and 208. Switches 207 and 208 may be controlled by control signals Phi1 and Phi2, generated by the synchronous control logic circuit (not shown). The output of the synchronous detect block 104 is coupled to the quasi-differential capacitance block 206. In one embodiment, the quasi-differential capacitance block 206 includes positive integration capacitor CINTP and negative integration capacitor CINTN. In one embodiment, when the output current at is positive, switch 207 is activated while switch 208 is opened, allowing the current IINTP to flow to the output node VOUTP. The current IOUTP charges up the positive integration capacitor CINTP. When the output current at IZ+, is negative, switch 208 is activated while switch 207 is opened, allowing the current IOUTN to flow to the output node VOUTN. In one embodiment, the current IOUTN discharges the negative integration capacitor CINTN. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the current IOUTN charges CINTN with a negative voltage. For example, if one node of CINTN is held at, for example, 4V, IOUTN can charge CINTN to, for example, 1V with a negative charge. As the current is alternately switched between the integration capacitors, the voltages at output nodes VOUTP and VOUTN grow apart differentially. The differential voltage between output nodes VOUTP and VOUTN can be applied to suitable processing circuitry (not shown) to detect the presence of a conductive object at the mutual capacitive sensor CM.
The waveform Ix represents the current flowing across the mutual capacitance CM and into the input X of current conveyor 102. As discussed above, the voltage at the receive electrode 114 is kept constant at some fraction of the supply voltage (e.g., VCC/2). Thus, when the voltage VC1 on transmit electrode 112 is pulled high to VCC, the resulting voltage differential induces a current IX across CM and into the input X of current conveyor 102. In one embodiment, this current sinked in the current conveyor 102 is referred to as a positive current, as is indicated in the waveform IX. When the voltage VC1 on transmit electrode 112 is pulled low (e.g., to a ground potential), the voltage differential induces a current IX across CM out of the input X of current conveyor 102. In one embodiment, this current sourced in the current conveyor 102 is referred to as a negative current, as is indicated in the waveform IX.
The current conveyor 102 mirrors the current IX at the bipolar output IZ+. The waveform IZ+, represents the current at the bipolar output. When the current IX is sourced at input X, an output current is also sourced at output IZ+. In one embodiment, this current is referred to as a positive current Likewise, when the current IX is sinked in input X, the output current is sinked at output IZ+. In one embodiment, this current is referred to as a negative current.
The waveforms Phi1 and Phi2 represent the control signals for switches 207 and 208, respectively. In one embodiment, Phi1 and Phi2 are generated by the synchronous control logic block. The synchronous control logic block causes the signal Phi1 to be high when the signal TXD is high, because the resulting current at IZ+, will be positive. The high signal Phi1 causes switch 207 to close allowing a current IOUTP to flow to output node VOUTP The current IOUTP charges up the integration capacitor CINTP, causing the output voltage to increase, as shown in the waveform VOUTP. The synchronous control logic block further causes the signal Phi2 to be high when the signal TXD is low, because the resulting current at IZ+, will be negative. The high signal Phi2 causes switch 208 to close allowing a current IOUTN to flow to output node VOUTN. The current IOUTN discharges the integration capacitor CINTN, causing the output voltage to decrease, as shown in the waveform VOUTN. In one embodiment, the waveforms Phi1 and Phi2 are non-overlapping and the waveform TXD is delayed with respect to Phi1 and Phi2, such that Phi1 and Phi2 have changed state before TXD changes.
Referring again to
In one embodiment, the integration capacitors CINTP and CINTN are pre-charged to a certain voltage level. Depending on the technology used to implement the circuit, a certain amount of headroom may be used. In one embodiment, where the supply voltage is, for example, 5V, the positive integration capacitor CINTP may be pre-charged to, for example, 1V and the negative integration capacitor CINTN may be pre-charged to, for example, 4V, allowing 1V of headroom on either end of the supply range. In one embodiment, the pre-charging is accomplished using voltages from reference generator 230 where the application of the voltage levels is controlled by switches SW1 and SW2.
At block 425, method 400 senses the current at the low impedance input of the current conveyor. The current may be affected by the presence of a conductive object near the mutual capacitance sensor. At block 430, method 400 mirrors the sensed input current at a bipolar output of the current conveyor. At block 435, method 400 switches the current to flow to either the positive or negative output node. When the current at the bipolar output of the current conveyor is positive, switch 207 is activated, and when the current is negative, switch 208 is activated.
At block 440, a programmable amount of charge is subtracted from each of the positive and negative currents to compensate for the baseline capacitance of the mutual capacitance sensor. At block 445, the remaining charge is stored in the integration capacitors. The charge from the positive output current is stored in the positive integration capacitor, causing the positive output voltage to increase. The negative output current discharges the negative integration capacitor, causing the negative output voltage to decrease. At block 450, the quasi-differential voltage between the positive output node and the negative output node is output to processing circuitry for determination of whether a conductive object is present.
In one embodiment, the processing circuitry (described below with respect to
In one embodiment, IDAC 540 is a single ended IDAC configured, via control signal IDACEN, to perform baseline compensation by subtracting a portion of the output current during each clock cycle. The amount that is subtracted from the output current may be programmable via IDACEN. Switch pwc1 controls when output current is subtracted.
In one embodiment, the output current from both IZ+, and IZ− of each current conveyor 702A and 702B (i.e., IOUTP and IOUTN) is passed through synchronous detect block 704. In one embodiment, the synchronous detect block 704 includes switches 707, 708, 709 and 710. Switches 707-710 may be controlled by one of control signals Phi1 and Phi2, generated by the synchronous control logic circuit (not shown). In one embodiment, switches 707 and 710 are controlled by Phi1 and switches 708 and 709 are controlled by Phi2. The output of the synchronous detect block 704 is coupled to the charge storage circuit 706. In one embodiment, the charge storage circuit 706 includes a single integration capacitor CINT coupled to ground or some other suitable low supply voltage. In one embodiment, when the control signal Phi1 is activated, positive charge flows onto CINT from IZ+, of current conveyor 702A and negative charge flows onto CINT from IZ− of current conveyor 702B. Since the output current from current conveyor 702A is affected by the mutual capacitance sensor CMA, the presence of a conductive object proximate to CMA will cause the voltage at VOUT to decrease. Conversely, the presence of a conductive object proximate to mutual capacitance sensor CMB will cause the voltage at VOUT to increase.
When the control signal Phi2 is activated, negative charge flows onto CINT from IZ− of current conveyor 702A and positive charge flows onto CINT from IZ+, of current conveyor 702B. Accordingly, the presence of a conductive object proximate to CMA will cause the voltage at VOUT to increase, while the presence of a conductive object proximate to mutual capacitance sensor CMB will cause the voltage at VOUT to decrease. The voltage at output node VOUT can be applied to suitable processing circuitry (not shown) to detect the presence of a conductive object at the mutual capacitive sensors CMA and CMB.
In one embodiment, the voltage VC2 at the electrode 816 is controlled by varying the supply voltage at the input Y of current conveyor 102. As the voltage VC2 is increased, a current IX flows out of the input X of current conveyor 102 and through self capacitance CSE. As the voltage VC2 is decreased, the current IX2 flows into the input X of current conveyor 102. The current conveyor 102 senses the current IX2 and mirrors the current at a bipolar output IZ+. In one embodiment, when the current IX is sourced at input X, an output current is also sourced at output IZ+, Likewise, when the current IX is sinked in input X, the output current is sinked at output IZ+.
The output current from IZ+, passes through a synchronous detect block 104. In one embodiment, the synchronous detect block 104 includes switches 207 and 208. Switches 207 and 208 may be controlled by control signals Phi1 and Phi2, generated by the synchronous control logic circuit (not shown). The output of the synchronous detect block 104 is coupled to the quasi-differential capacitance block 206. In one embodiment, the quasi-differential capacitance block 206 includes positive integration capacitor CINTP and negative integration capacitor CINTN. In one embodiment, when the output current at IZ+, is positive, switch 207 is activated while switch 208 is opened, allowing the current IOUTP to flow to the output node VOUTP. The current IOUTP charges up the positive integration capacitor CINTP. When the output current at IZ+, is negative, switch 208 is activated while switch 207 is opened, allowing the current IOUTN to flow to the output node VOUTN. The current IOUTN discharges the negative integration capacitor CINTN. As the current is alternately switched between the integration capacitors, the voltages at output nodes VOUTP and VOUTN grow apart differentially. The differential voltage between output nodes VOUTP and VOUTN can be applied to processing circuitry (not shown) to detect the presence of a conductive object at the self capacitive sensor CSE.
In one embodiment, the transmit driver circuit 820 drives a transmit voltage onto one terminal of a shield capacitor CSHIELD. The transmit driver circuit 820 may include a voltage divider formed, for example, by two transistors coupled between two voltages, VSHIELD
The processing device 990 may also include an analog block array (not illustrated). The analog block array is also coupled to the system bus. Analog block array also may be configured to implement a variety of analog circuits (e.g., ADC, analog filters, etc.) using, in one embodiment, configurable UMs. The analog block array may also be coupled to the GPIO 907.
As illustrated, capacitive sensor 910 may be integrated into processing device 990. Capacitive sensor 910 may include analog I/O for coupling to an external component, such as touch-sensor pad 920, touch-sensor slider 930, touch-sensor buttons 940, and/or other devices.
It should be noted that the embodiments described herein are not limited to touch-sensor pads for notebook implementations, but can be used in any other suitable type of capacitive sensing implementation. For example, the sensing device may be a touch-sensor slider 930, or a touch-sensor button 940 (e.g., capacitance sensing button). Similarly, the operations described herein are not limited to notebook cursor operations, but can include other appropriate types of operations, such as lighting control (dimmer), volume control, graphic equalizer control, speed control or other control operations requiring gradual adjustments. It should also be noted that these embodiments of capacitive sensing implementations may be used in conjunction with non-capacitive sensing elements, including but not limited to pick buttons, sliders (e.g., display brightness and contrast), scroll-wheels, multi-media control (e.g., volume, track advance, and the like), handwriting recognition, and numeric keypad operation.
In one embodiment, the electronic system 900 includes a touch-sensor pad 920 coupled to the processing device 990 via bus 921. Touch-sensor pad 920 may include a multi-dimension sensor array. The multi-dimension sensor array comprises a plurality of sensor elements, organized as rows and columns. In an alternative embodiment, the electronic system 900 includes a touch-sensor slider 930 coupled to the processing device 990 via bus 931. Touch-sensor slider 930 may include a single-dimension sensor array. The single-dimension sensor array comprises a plurality of sensor elements, organized as rows, or, alternatively, as columns. In another embodiment, the electronic system 900 includes a touch-sensor button 940 coupled to the processing device 990 via bus 941. Touch-sensor button 940 may include a single-dimension or multi-dimension sensor array. The single- or multi-dimension sensor array comprises a plurality of sensor elements. For a touch-sensor button, the plurality of sensor elements may be coupled together to detect a presence of a conductive object over the entire surface of the sensing device. Alternatively, the touch-sensor button 940 has a single sensor element to detect the presence of the conductive object. In one embodiment, the touch-sensor button 940 may be a capacitive sensor element. Capacitive sensor elements may be used as non-contact switches. These switches, when protected by an insulating layer, offer resistance to severe environments.
The electronic system 900 may include any combination of one or more of the touch-sensor pad 920, touch-sensor slider 930, touch-sensor button 940 and/or capacitive pressure sensor 975. In an alternative embodiment, the electronic system 900 may also include non-capacitive sensor elements 970 coupled to the processing device 990 via bus 971. The non-capacitive sensor elements 970 may include buttons, light emitting diodes (LEDs), and other user interface devices, such as a mouse, a keyboard or other functional keys that do not require capacitance sensing. In one embodiment, buses 971, 941, 931 and 921 may be a single bus. Alternatively, these buses may be configured into any combination of one or more separate buses.
The processing device may also provide value-added functionality, such as keyboard control integration, LEDs, battery charger and general purpose I/O, as illustrated as non-capacitive sensor elements 970. Non-capacitive sensor elements 970 are coupled to the GPIO 907.
The processing device 990 can include other suitable types of circuits, modules, arrays, and other like analog and digital elements. For example, processing device 990 may include internal oscillator/clocks 906 and communication block 908. The oscillator/clocks block 906 provides clock signals to one or more of the components of processing device 990. Communication block 908 may be used to communicate with an external component, such as a host processor 950, via host interface (UF) line 951. Alternatively, processing device 990 may also be coupled to embedded controller 960 to communicate with the external components, such as host 950. Interfacing to the host 950 can be through various methods. In one exemplary embodiment, interfacing with the host 950 may be done using a standard PS/2 interface to connect to an embedded controller 960, which in turn sends data to the host 950 via low pin count (LPC) interface. In some instances, it may be beneficial for the processing device 990 to do both touch-sensor pad and keyboard control operations, thereby freeing up the embedded controller 960 for other housekeeping functions. In another exemplary embodiment, interfacing may be done using a universal serial bus (USB) interface directly coupled to the host 950 via host interface line 951. Alternatively, the processing device 990 may communicate to external components, such as the host 950, using industry standard interfaces, such as USB, PS/2, inter-integrated circuit (I2C) bus, system packet interfaces (SPI), or any other suitable type of interface. In one embodiment, the host 950 and/or embedded controller 960 may be coupled to the processing device 990 with a ribbon or flex cable from an assembly, which houses the sensing device and processing device.
In one embodiment, the processing device 990 is configured to communicate with the embedded controller 960 or the host 950 to send and/or receive data. The data may be a command or alternatively a signal. In an exemplary embodiment, the electronic system 900 may operate in both standard-mouse compatible and enhanced modes. The standard-mouse compatible mode utilizes the HID class drivers already built into the Operating System (OS) software of host 950. These drivers enable the processing device 990 and sensing device to operate as a standard cursor control user interface device, such as a two-button PS/2 mouse. The enhanced mode may enable additional features such as scrolling (reporting absolute position) or disabling the sensing device, such as when a mouse is plugged into the notebook. Alternatively, the processing device 990 may be configured to communicate with the embedded controller 960 or the host 950 using non-OS drivers, such as dedicated touch-sensor pad drivers, or other drivers known by those of ordinary skill in the art.
In other words, the processing device 990 may operate to communicate data (e.g., commands or signals) using hardware, software, and/or firmware, and the data may be communicated directly to the processing device of the host 950, such as a host processor, or alternatively, may be communicated to the host 950 via drivers of the host 950, such as OS drivers or other non-OS drivers. It should also be noted that the host 950 may directly communicate with the processing device 990 via host interface 951.
In one embodiment, the data sent to the host 950 from the processing device 990 includes click, double-click, movement of the cursor, scroll-up, scroll-down, scroll-left, scroll-right, step back, step forward, Rewind, Fast Forward, Play, Stop, and the like. Alternatively, other user interface device commands and/or signals may be communicated to the host 950 from the processing device 990. These commands may be based on gestures occurring on the sensing device that are recognized by the processing device, such as tap, push, hop, and zigzag gestures. Alternatively, other commands and/or signals may be recognized. For example, signals may be sent that indicate the recognition of these operations.
In particular, a tap gesture, for example, may be a user's finger (e.g., conductive object) that is on the sensing device for less than a threshold time. If the time the finger is placed on the touchpad is greater than the threshold time, it may be considered to be a movement of the cursor, in the x- or y-axes. Scroll-up, scroll-down, scroll-left, and scroll-right, step back, and step-forward may be detected when the absolute position of the conductive object is within a pre-defined area, and movement of the conductive object is detected.
Processing device 990 may reside on a common carrier substrate such as, for example, an integrated circuit (IC) die substrate, a multi-chip module substrate or the like. Alternatively, the components of processing device 690 may be one or more separate integrated circuits and/or discrete components. In one exemplary embodiment, processing device 990 may be a Programmable System on a Chip (PSoC) processing device, manufactured by Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, San Jose, Calif. Alternatively, processing device 990 may be one or more other processing devices known by those of ordinary skill in the art, such as a microprocessor or central processing unit, a controller, special-purpose processor, digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or the like. In an alternative embodiment, for example, the processing device 990 may be a network processor having multiple processors including a core unit and multiple microengines. Additionally, the processing device 990 may include any combination of general-purpose processing device(s) and special-purpose processing device(s).
In one embodiment, one or more processing devices, such as processing device 690, may be used in a master/slave configuration. For example, one processing device may operate as the master and one or more processing devices may operate as the slave(s). The processing devices may be configured so that the master provides a clock signal and start of scan signal to the slaves, which perform a scan of a touch sensor device, such as for example, touch-sensor pad 920. The results of the scan may be sent back to the master. In other embodiments, another processing device is used to control operation of the master and slaves and stores the results of the scans. The master/slave configuration may be effective when the touch-sensor pad 920 is relatively large by having many parallel channels (e.g., 8 channels per chip).
It should be noted that the embodiments described herein are not limited to having a configuration of a processing device coupled to a host, but may include a system that measures the capacitance on the touch-sensing device and sends the new data to a host computer where it is analyzed by an application. In effect, the processing that is done by processing device 990 may also be done (in whole or in part) in the host.
In one embodiment, the method and apparatus described herein may be implemented in a fully self-contained touch-sensor pad, which outputs fully processed x/y movement and gestures data signals or data commands to a host. In an alternative embodiment, the method and apparatus may be implemented in a touch-sensor pad, which outputs x/y movement data and also finger presence data to a host, and where the host processes the received data to detect gestures. In another embodiment, the method and apparatus may be implemented in a touch-sensor pad, which outputs raw capacitance data to a host, where the host processes the capacitance data to compensate for quiescent and stray capacitance, and calculate x/y movement and detects gestures by processing the capacitance data. Alternatively, the method and apparatus may be implemented in a touch-sensor pad, which outputs pre-processed capacitance data to a host, where the touch-sensor pad processes the capacitance data to compensate for quiescent and stray capacitance, and the host calculate x/y movement and detects gestures from the preprocessed capacitance data.
In one embodiment, the electronic system that includes the embodiments described herein may be implemented in a conventional laptop touch-sensor pad. Alternatively, it may be implemented in a wired or wireless keyboard integrating a touch-sensor pad, which is itself connected to a host. In such an implementation, the processing described above as being performed by the “host” may be performed in part or in whole by the keyboard controller, which may then pass fully processed, pre-processed or unprocessed data to the system host. In another embodiment, the embodiments may be implemented in a mobile handset (e.g., cell phone) or other electronic devices where the touch-sensor pad may operate in one of two or more modes. For example, the touch-sensor pad may operate either as a touch-sensor pad for x/y positioning and gesture recognition, or as a keypad or other array of touch-sensor buttons and/or sliders.
Capacitive sensor 910 may be integrated into the IC of the processing device 990, or alternatively, in a separate IC. Alternatively, descriptions of capacitive sensor 910 may be generated and compiled for incorporation into other integrated circuits. For example, behavioral level code describing capacitive sensor 910, or portions thereof, may be generated using a hardware descriptive language, such as VHDL or Verilog, and stored to a machine-accessible medium (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, floppy disk, or the like). Furthermore, the behavioral level code can be compiled into register transfer level (“RTL”) code, a netlist or even a circuit layout and stored to a machine-accessible medium. The behavioral level code, the RTL code, the netlist and the circuit layout all represent various levels of abstraction to describe capacitive sensor 910.
It should be noted that the components of electronic system 900 may include all the components described above. Alternatively, electronic system 900 may include only some of or more than the components described above.
In one embodiment, electronic system 900 may be used in a notebook computer. Alternatively, the electronic system 900 may be used in other applications, such as a mobile handset, a personal data assistant (PDA), a keyboard, a television, a remote control, a monitor, a handheld multi-media device, a handheld video player, a handheld gaming device, a control panel, or other suitable type of device, application, or system.
In one embodiment, capacitive sensor 910 may be a capacitive sensor relaxation oscillator (CSR). The CSR may have an array of capacitive touch switches using a current-programmable relaxation oscillator, an analog multiplexer, digital counting functions and high-level software routines to compensate for environmental and physical switch variations. The switch array may include combinations of independent switches, sliding switches (e.g., touch-sensor slider), and touch-sensor pads implemented as a pair of orthogonal sliding switches. The CSR may include physical, electrical, and software components. The physical component may include the physical switch itself, typically a pattern constructed on a printed circuit board (PCB) with an insulating cover, a flexible membrane or a transparent overlay. The electrical component may include an oscillator or other means to convert a changed capacitance into a measured signal. The electrical component may also include a counter or timer to measure the oscillator output. The software component may include detection and compensation software algorithms to convert the count value into a switch detection decision. For example, in the case of slide switches or X-Y touch-sensor pads, a calculation for finding position of the conductive object to greater resolution than the physical pitch of the switches may be used.
It should be noted that there are various known methods for measuring capacitance. Although the embodiments described herein are described using a relaxation oscillator, the present embodiments are not limited to using relaxation oscillators, but may include other methods, such as current versus voltage phase shift measurement, resistor-capacitor charge timing, capacitive bridge divider, charge transfer, or the like.
In one method, the current versus voltage phase shift measurement may include driving the capacitance through a fixed-value resistor to yield voltage and current waveforms that are out of phase by a predictable amount. The drive frequency can be adjusted to keep the phase measurement in a readily measured range. In another method, the resistor-capacitor charge timing may include charging the capacitor through a fixed resistor and measuring timing on the voltage ramp. Small capacitor values may require very large resistors for reasonable timing. In an alternative method, the capacitive bridge divider may include driving the capacitor under test through a fixed reference capacitor. The reference capacitor and the capacitor under test form a voltage divider. The voltage signal is recovered with a synchronous demodulator, which may be done in the processing device 990. In another method, the charge transfer may be conceptually similar to an R-C charging circuit. In this method, CP is the capacitance being sensed. CSUM is the summing capacitor, into which charge is transferred on successive cycles. At the start of the measurement cycle, the voltage on CSUM is reset. The voltage on CSUM increases exponentially (and only slightly) with each clock cycle. The time for this voltage to reach a specific threshold is measured with a counter. Additional details regarding these alternative embodiments have not been included so as to not obscure the present embodiments, and because these alternative embodiments for measuring capacitance are known by those of ordinary skill in the art.
Embodiments of the present invention include various operations described herein. These operations may be performed by hardware components, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. Any of the signals provided over various buses described herein may be time multiplexed with other signals and provided over one or more common buses. Additionally, the interconnection between circuit components or blocks may be shown as buses or as single signal lines. Each of the buses may alternatively be one or more single signal lines and each of the single signal lines may alternatively be buses.
Certain embodiments may be implemented as a computer program product that may include instructions stored on a machine-readable medium. These instructions may be used to program a general-purpose or special-purpose computer or processor to perform the described operations. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form (e.g., software, processing application) readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, magnetic storage medium (e.g., floppy diskette), optical storage medium (e.g., CD-ROM), magneto-optical storage medium, read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), erasable programmable memory (e.g., EPROM and EEPROM), flash memory, or another appropriate type of medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
Additionally, some embodiments may be practiced in distributed computing environments where the machine-readable medium is stored on and/or executed by more than one computer system. In addition, the information transferred between computer systems may either be pulled or pushed across the communication medium connecting the computer systems.
The digital processing devices described herein may include one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor or central processing unit, a controller, or the like. Alternatively, the digital processing device may include one or more special-purpose processing devices such as a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or the like. In an alternative embodiment, for example, the digital processing device may be a network processor having multiple processors including a core unit and multiple microengines. Additionally, the digital processing device may include any combination of general-purpose processing devices and special-purpose processing devices.
Although the operations of the methods herein are shown and described in a particular order, the order of the operations of each method may be altered so that certain operations may be performed in an inverse order or so that certain operation may be performed, at least in part, concurrently with other operations. In another embodiment, instructions or sub-operations of distinct operations may be in an intermittent and/or alternating manner.
This application which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/623,661, filed Nov. 23, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/117,031 filed on Nov. 21, 2008, which are hereby incorporated by reference by their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4039940 | Butler et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4145748 | Eichelberger et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4264903 | Bigelow | Apr 1981 | A |
4283713 | Philipp | Aug 1981 | A |
4293734 | Pepper, Jr. | Oct 1981 | A |
4438404 | Philipp | Mar 1984 | A |
4475151 | Philipp | Oct 1984 | A |
4497575 | Philipp | Feb 1985 | A |
4614937 | Poujois | Sep 1986 | A |
4728932 | Atherton | Mar 1988 | A |
4736097 | Philipp | Apr 1988 | A |
4736191 | Matzke et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742331 | Barrow et al. | May 1988 | A |
4772983 | Kerber et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773024 | Faggin et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4802103 | Faggin et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4825147 | Cook et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4876534 | Mead et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4879461 | Philipp | Nov 1989 | A |
4879505 | Barrow et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4920399 | Hall | Apr 1990 | A |
4935702 | Mead et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940980 | Tice | Jul 1990 | A |
4953928 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962342 | Mead et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5049758 | Mead et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055719 | Hughes | Oct 1991 | A |
5055827 | Philipp | Oct 1991 | A |
5059920 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5068622 | Mead et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073759 | Mead et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083044 | Mead et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5095284 | Mead | Mar 1992 | A |
5097305 | Mead et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5107149 | Platt et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109261 | Mead et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5119038 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5120996 | Mead et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122800 | Philipp | Jun 1992 | A |
5126685 | Platt et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5146106 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160899 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165054 | Platt et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166562 | Allen et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5204549 | Platt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5243554 | Allen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248873 | Allen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5260592 | Mead et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270963 | Allen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276407 | Mead et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5281862 | Ma | Jan 1994 | A |
5289023 | Mead | Feb 1994 | A |
5294889 | Heep et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303329 | Mead et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5323158 | Ferguson, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324958 | Mead et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331215 | Allen et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336936 | Allen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339213 | O'Callaghan | Aug 1994 | A |
5349303 | Gerpheide | Sep 1994 | A |
5374787 | Miller et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381515 | Platt et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384467 | Plimon et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5408194 | Steinbach et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412387 | Vincelette et al. | May 1995 | A |
5488204 | Mead et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5495077 | Miller et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5541600 | Blumenkrantz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541878 | Lemoncheck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543588 | Bisset et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543590 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543591 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555907 | Philipp | Sep 1996 | A |
5565658 | Gerpheide et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566702 | Philipp | Oct 1996 | A |
5572205 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5629891 | Lemoncheck et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648642 | Miller et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5672959 | Der | Sep 1997 | A |
5682032 | Philipp | Oct 1997 | A |
5684487 | Timko | Nov 1997 | A |
5730165 | Philipp | Mar 1998 | A |
5757368 | Gerpheide et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760852 | Wu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763909 | Mead et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763924 | Lum et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767457 | Gerpheide et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796183 | Hourmand et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801340 | Peter | Sep 1998 | A |
5812698 | Platt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841078 | Miller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844265 | Mead et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854625 | Frisch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861583 | Schediwy et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861875 | Gerpheide | Jan 1999 | A |
5864242 | Allen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864392 | Winklhofer et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880411 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889236 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914465 | Allen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914708 | Lagrange et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920309 | Bisset et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920310 | Faggin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926566 | Wang et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942733 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943052 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969513 | Clark | Oct 1999 | A |
6023422 | Allen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028271 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028959 | Wang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6097432 | Mead et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148104 | Wang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151967 | McIntosh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185450 | Seguine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188228 | Philipp | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188391 | Seely et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191723 | Lewis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222528 | Gerpheide et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239389 | Allen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249447 | Boylan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262717 | Donohue et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271719 | Sevastopoulos | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6271720 | Sevastopoulos | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280391 | Olson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288707 | Philipp | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304014 | England et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320184 | Winklhofer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326859 | Goldman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342817 | Crofts et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344773 | Sevastopoulos et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353200 | Schwankhart | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366099 | Reddi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377009 | Philipp | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380929 | Platt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380931 | Gillespie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414671 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430305 | Decker | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441073 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441682 | Vinn et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445257 | Cox et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452514 | Philipp | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457355 | Philipp | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459321 | Belch | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466036 | Philipp | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489899 | Ely et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498720 | Glad | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6499359 | Washeleski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522083 | Roach | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522128 | Ely et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522187 | Sousa | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523416 | Takagi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534970 | Ely et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535200 | Philipp | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6570557 | Westerman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587093 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610936 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614313 | Crofts et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624640 | Lund et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639586 | Gerpheide | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642857 | Schediwy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649924 | Philipp et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667740 | Ely et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673308 | Hino et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677932 | Westerman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680731 | Gerpheide et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683462 | Shimizu | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6704005 | Kato et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705511 | Dames et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714817 | Daynes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730863 | Gerpheide et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6750852 | Gillespie et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774644 | Eberlein | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788221 | Ely et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6788521 | Nishi | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798218 | Kasperkovitz | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809275 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856433 | Hatano et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859159 | Michalski | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873203 | Latham, II et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879215 | Roach | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888536 | Westerman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6888538 | Ely et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893724 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903402 | Miyazawa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6904570 | Foote et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914547 | Swaroop et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6933873 | Horsley et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6949811 | Miyazawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958594 | Redl et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969978 | Dening | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970120 | Bjornsen | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970126 | O'Dowd et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975123 | Malang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993607 | Philipp | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030782 | Ely et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031886 | Hargreaves | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032051 | Reay et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7046230 | Zadesky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7078916 | Denison | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109978 | Gillespie et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119550 | Kitano et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129935 | Mackey | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133140 | Lukacs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133793 | Ely et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141968 | Hibbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141987 | Hibbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148704 | Philipp | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151528 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7183851 | Song | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212189 | Shaw et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7235983 | O'Dowd et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253643 | Seguine | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7262609 | Reynolds | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288946 | Hargreaves et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288977 | Stanley | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298124 | Kan et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301350 | Hargreaves et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315793 | Jean | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339580 | Westerman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7417411 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417441 | Reynolds | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423437 | Hargreaves et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7449895 | Ely et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450113 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451050 | Hargreaves | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453270 | Hargreaves et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453279 | Corbin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466307 | Trent, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7498822 | Lee | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499040 | Zadesky et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521941 | Ely et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7663607 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683641 | Hargreaves et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724001 | Kleven | May 2010 | B2 |
7812827 | Hotelling et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8358142 | Maharyta | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20010008478 | Mcintosh et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010020850 | Mcintosh et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020063688 | Shaw et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020191029 | Gillespie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030062889 | Ely et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080755 | Kobayashi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090277 | Lechner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040178989 | Shahoian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050024341 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050122119 | Barlow | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060001490 | Song | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032680 | Elias et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038793 | Philipp | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066582 | Lyon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071674 | Jean | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138574 | Saito et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060273804 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070227253 | Kleven | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257894 | Philipp | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268273 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268274 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268275 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080041639 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041640 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042986 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042987 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042988 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042989 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042994 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048997 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068100 | Goodnow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085720 | Hirano et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088602 | Hotelling et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111714 | Kremin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116904 | Reynolds et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128182 | Westerman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162996 | Krah et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080278178 | Philipp | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090008161 | Jones et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009491 | Grivina | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058802 | Orsley | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096757 | Hotelling et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160461 | Zangl et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090267622 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090315258 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100060622 | Van Der et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100201382 | Welland | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219846 | Dubery | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110007021 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025629 | Grivna et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2007128682 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sedra et al., “A Second Generation Current Conveyor and Its Application,” IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, Feb. 1970, vol. 17, pp. 132-134; 3 pages. |
Sedra et al., “Current Conveyor Theory and Practice,” IEEE Proceedings (Part G), Chapter 3, Apr. 1990, pp. 93-126; 18 pages. |
Sedra, Adel S. et al., “Microelectronic Circuits,” 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, pp. xiii-xx and 861-883, 1991; 20 pages. |
Seguine, Ryan; “Layout Guidelines for PSoC CapSense,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2292; Jul. 22, 2005; 13 pages. |
Shah et al., “Cascadable Electronically Tunable Sito Current-Mode Active-Only Universal Filter,” 2008; 6 pages. |
Smith et al., “The Current Conveyor—A New Circuit Building Block,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Aug. 1968, pp. 1368-1369; 2 pages. |
Soliman A. Mahmoud, “New Fully-Differential CMOS Second-Generation Current Conveyor,” ETRI Journal, vol. 28, No. 4, Aug. 2006; pp. 495-501; 7 pages. |
USPT Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,614 dated Jun. 21, 2011; 17 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/623,661 dated May 17, 2012; 13 pages. |
USPTO Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,171 dated Jul. 9, 2013; 8 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,614 dated Jan. 31, 2011; 15 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/623,661 dated May 29, 2013; 9 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,614 dated Feb. 27, 2013; 12 pages. |
Van Ess, David; “Simulating a 555 Timer with PSoC,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2286, May 19, 2005; 10 pages. |
Vladislav Golub, Ph.D., “Sigma-Delta ADCs”, pub. date: Jun. 17, 2003, 10 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US 11/67153 mailed Apr. 24, 2012; 9 pages. |
“CSD User Module Data Sheet,” CSD v1.0, Oct. 23, 2006; 58 pages. |
“Sigma-Delta ADCs and DACs, AN-283 Application Note, Analog Devices,” 1993; Downloaded from <http://www.analog.com/UpoloadedFiles/Application—Notes/292524291525717245054923680458171AN283.pdf>; 16 pages. |
A. Fabre, “Third-Generation Current Conveyor: a New Helpful Active Element,” Electronics Letters, vol. 31, No. 5, Mar. 1995, pp. 338-339; 2 pages. |
Adisak Monopapassorn, “CMOS High Frequency/Low Voltage Full-Wave Rectifier,” Thammasat International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr.-Jun. 2003; 11 pages. |
Ahmed M. Soliman, “Generation of Current Conveyor-Based All-Pass Filters from Op Amp-Based Circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 44, No. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 324-330; 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,614: “Multi-Functional Capacitance Sensing Circuit With a Current Conveyor,” Viktor Kremin, filed Jul. 22, 2009; 56 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,447: “Capacitance Sensing Systems, Circuits and Methods That Include Current Conveyor Based Oscillators,” Andriy Maharyta, filed Jul. 18, 2011; 58 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,514: “Active Integrator for a Capacitive Sense Array,” Paul Walsh, filed Sep. 30, 2011; 46 pages. |
Assi et al., “An Offset Compensated and High-Gain CMOS Current-Feedback Op-Amp,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 85-90; 6 pages. |
Calvo et al., “Novel High Performance CMOS Current Conveyor,” Microelectronics Reliability, Mar. 2003, pp. 955-961; 7 pages. |
Cataldo et al., “Active Capacitance Multipliers Using Current Conveyors,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, Jun. 1998, pp. 343-346; 4 pages. |
Chapweske, Adam; “The PS/2 Mouse Interface,” PS/2 Mouse Interfacing, 2001, retrieved on May 18, 2006; 11 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “CY8C21×34 Data Sheet,” CSR User Module, CSR V.1.0; Oct. 6, 2005; 36 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “Cypress Introduces PSoC(TM)-Based Capacitive Touch Sensor Solution,” Cypress Press Release; May 31, 2005; <http://www.cypress.com/portal/server>; retrieved on Feb. 5, 2007; 4 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “FAN Controller CG6457AM and CG6462AM,” PSoC Mixed Signal Array Preliminary Data Sheet; May 24, 2005; 25 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “PSoC CY8C20×34 Technical Reference Manual (TRM),” PSoC CY8C20×34 TRM, Version 1.0, 2006; 218 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “PSoC Mixed-Signal Controllers,” Production Description; <http://www.cypress.com/portal/server>; retrieved on Sep. 27, 2005; 2 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, “Release Notes sm017,” Jan. 24, 2007; 3 pages. |
Dave Van Ess, “Understanding Switched Capacitor Analog Blocks,” Application Note AN2041, Mar. 30, 2004; 16 pages. |
Dennis Seguine, “Capacitive Switch Scan,” AN2233a, Application Note, CY8C21×34, Apr. 7, 2005; 6 pages. |
Elwan et al., “Low-Voltage Low-Power CMOS Current Conveyors,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1997; pp. 828-835; 8 pages. |
Ibrahim et al., “A CMOS Realization of Inverting Second Generation Current Conveyor ‘Positive’ (ICCII+),” The Norwegian Signal Processing Society and IEEE 5th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, Oct. 2002; 4 pages. |
Ibrahime et al., “A New Voltage Scaling Type Digital-Analog Converter Using Only DDCCS,” 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2003; 4 pages. |
Imazeki et al., “Low-Voltage, Low-Power, Second-Generation Current Conveyors,” Electrical Engineering in Japan, vol. 138, No. 2, Nov. 2001, pp. 41-48; 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US11/67153 dated Apr. 24, 2012; 8 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US10/28943 mailed on Sep. 7, 2010; 2 pages. |
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US10/28943 mailed on Sep. 7, 2010; 5 pages. |
James Quan, “CMOS Programmable Gain Circuits: Amplifiers and Current Conveyors,” The University of Calgary, Aug. 2005; 141 pages. |
Kayed et al., “VLSI Design and Implementation of CMOS Current Conveyors,” The Eleventh International Conference on Microelectronics, Nov. 1999, pp. 55-57; 3 pages. |
Kimmo Koli, “CMOS Current Amplifiers: Speed versus Nonlinearity,” Dissertation, Nov. 2000; 305 pages. |
L. Grigorescu, “Amplifiers Built with Current-Conveyors,” Sep. 2006, pp. 105-109; 5 pages. |
Lee, Mark; “EMC Design Considerations for PSoC CapSense Applications,” Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Application Note AN2318; Sep. 16, 2005; 6 pages. |
Madian et al., “New 1.5-V CMOS Second Generation Current Conveyor Based on Wide Range Transconductor,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Springer Netherlands, Sep. 2006, pp. 267-279; 13 pages. |
Mahmoud et al., “Low-Voltage CMOS Current Feedback Operational Amplifier and Its Application,” ETRI Journal, vol. 29, No. 2, Apr. 2007, pp. 212-218; 7 pages. |
Maitreechit et al., “A Full-Wave Rectifier Using a Current Conveyor and Current Mirrors with Improved Efficiency,” Thammasat International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, No. 2, Apr.-Jun. 2005, pp. 21-27; 7 pages. |
Mark Lee, “CapSense Best Practices,” Cypress Semiconductor Application Note, Oct. 16, 2006; 10 pages. |
Mark Lee, “The art of capacitive tough sensing”, Cypress Perform, Published in Embedded.com (http://www.embedded.com), Mar. 2007, pp. 1-10. |
Masciotti et al., “CMOS Current-Mode Analog Circuit Building Blocks for RF DC-DC Converter Controllers,” Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2003, vol. 3, pp. 455-458; 4 pages. |
Maundy et al., “A New Configuration for Current Feedback Operational Amplifiers,” The 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, Aug. 2002, pp. 547-550; 4 pages. |
Minaei et al., “High Performance CMOS Realization of the Third Generation Current Conveyor (CCIII),” MWSCAS, 2002, 16 pages. |
Mohit Kumar, “Low-Voltage Current-Mode Analog Cells,” M. Tech. Credit Seminar Report, Electronic Systems Group, Nov. 2002, 16 pages. |
Montree Siripruchyanun, “Second Generation Current Conveyor (CCII),” PowerPoint Presentation, Jan. 2008; 29 pages. |
Pawarangkoon et al., “Four-Quadrant Current-Mode Divider Based on Current Conveyors,” IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON, Nov. 2004, vol. 4, pp. 380-383; 4 pages. |
Premont et al., “Current-Conveyor Based Field Programmable Analog Array,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Sep. 1998, vol. 17, pp. 155-157; 3 pages. |
Rajpiit et al., “Low Voltage, Low Power, High Performance Current Conveyors,” The 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2001, vol. 1, pp. 723-726; 4 pages. |
Rajput et al., “Advanced Applications of Current Conveyors: A Tutorial,” J. of Active and Passive Electronic Devices, vol. 2, 2007, Old City Publishing Inc., pp. 143-164; 22 pages. |
Robert Jania, “Cypress' CapSense Successive Approximation Algorithm,” Whiat Paper CSA RJO.doc, Jan. 17, 2007; 6 pages. |
S. Minaei, “A New High Performance CMOS Third Generation Current Conveyor (CCIII) and its Application,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 85, No. 3, Springer-Verlag, Jul. 2003, pp. 147-153; 7 pages. |
Salem et al., “A 2.5V 0.35um CMOS Current Conveyor and High Frequency High-Q Band-Pass Filter,” The 16th International Conference on Microelectronics, Dec. 2004, pp. 328-333; 6 pages. |
Sangil Park, “Motorola Digital Signal Processors, Principles of Sigma-Delta Modulation for Analog-to-Digital Converters,” Rev. 1, downloaded from <http://digitalsignallabs.com/SigmaDelta.pdf>, Mar. 1997; 64 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61117031 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12623661 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13739991 | US |