Receiver architecture for SDARS full band signal reception having an analog conversion to baseband stage

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6735416
  • Patent Number
    6,735,416
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 25, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 11, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A receiver adapted to receive a signal having at least first and second carrier frequencies on which first and second information signals are modulated, respectively. The inventive receiver further includes circuitry for converting the received signal to a complex baseband signal. In the illustrative embodiment, the received signal includes first and second ensembles. The first ensemble includes a first signal from a first source, a first signal from a second source and a first signal from a third source. The second ensemble includes a second signal from the first source, a second signal from the second source and a second signal from the third source. The receiver is adapted to selectively output the first and/or the second ensemble. Conversion of the band is achieved with quad mixers. The outputs of the mixers are digitized and selectively provided as the first and/or the second ensemble by a digital translation stage.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to communications systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to satellite digital audio service (SDARS) receiver architectures.




While the present invention is described herein with reference to illustrative embodiments for particular applications, it should be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. Those having ordinary skill in the art and access to the teachings provided herein will recognize additional modifications, applications, and embodiments within the scope thereof and additional fields in which the present invention would be of significant utility.




2. Description of the Related Art




Satellite radio operators will soon provide digital quality radio broadcast services covering the entire continental United States. These services intend to offer approximately 100 channels, of which nearly 50 channels will provide music with the remaining stations offering news, sports, talk and data channels. According to C. E. Unterberg, Towbin, satellite radio has the capability to revolutionize the radio industry, in the same manner that cable and satellite television revolutionized the television industry.




Satellite radio has the ability to improve terrestrial radio's potential by offering a better audio quality, greater coverage and fewer commercials. Accordingly, in October of 1997, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) granted two national satellite radio broadcast licenses. The FCC allocated 25 megahertz (MHz) of the electromagnetic spectrum for satellite digital broadcasting, 12.5 MHz of which are owned by CD Radio and 12.5 MHz of which are owned by the assignee of the present application “XM Satellite Radio Inc.”. The FCC further mandated the development of interoperable receivers for satellite radio reception, i.e. receivers capable of processing signals from either CD Radio or XM Radio broadcasts. The system plan for each licensee presently includes transmission of substantially the same program content from two or more geosynchronous or geostationary satellites to both mobile and fixed receivers on the ground. In urban canyons and other high population density areas with limited line-of-sight (LOS) satellite coverage, terrestrial repeaters will broadcast the same program content in order to improve coverage reliability. Some mobile receivers will be capable of simultaneously receiving signals from two satellites and one terrestrial repeater for combined spatial, frequency and time diversity, which provides significant mitigation against multipath and blockage of the satellite signals. In accordance with XM Radio's unique scheme, the 12.5 MHz band will be split into 6 slots. Four slots will be used for satellite transmission. The remaining two slots will be used for terrestrial re-enforcement.




In accordance with the XM frequency plan, each of two geostationary Hughes 702 satellites will transmit identical or at least similar program content. The signals transmitted with QPSK modulation from each satellite (hereinafter satellite


1


and satellite


2


) will be time interleaved to lower the short-term time correlation and to maximize the robustness of the signal. For reliable reception, the LOS signals transmitted from satellite


1


are received, reformatted to Multi-Carrier Modulation (MCM) and rebroadcast by non-line-of-sight (NLOS) terrestrial repeaters. The assigned 12.5 MHz bandwidth (hereinafter the “XM” band) is partitioned into two equal ensembles or program groups A and B. The use of two ensembles allows 4096 Mbits/s of total user data to be distributed across the available bandwidth. Each ensemble will be transmitted by each satellite on a separate radio frequency (RF) carrier. Each RF carrier supports up to 50 channels of music or data in Time Division Multiplex (TDM) format. With terrestrial repeaters transmitting an A and a B signal, six total slots are provided, each slot being centered at a different RF carrier frequency. The use of two ensembles also allows for the implementation of a novel frequency plan which affords improved isolation between the satellite signals and the terrestrial signal when the receiver is located near the terrestrial repeater.




In any event, with different content being provided on each ensemble and inasmuch as data will be transmitted along with music content on one or both ensembles, it is conceivable that a listener will may want to access content on both ensembles simultaneously.




Unfortunately, there was no efficient satellite radio receiver architecture capable of receiving two ensembles simultaneously. Accordingly, system designers were forced to consider either replicating the data on both ensembles or replicating the tuner within the receiver. Both approaches were unacceptably costly. As a result, there was a need in the art for satellite radio receiver architecture capable of receiving two ensembles simultaneously which will not require a replication of the tuner nor a replication of the data broadcast channel on both ensembles.




The need in the art for a satellite radio receiver architecture capable of receiving two ensembles simultaneously is addressed by the invention disclosed and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/318,296, filed May 25, 1999 by P. Marko et al., entitled LOW COST INTEROPERABLE SATELLITE DIGITAL AUDIO RADIO SERVICE (SDARS) RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE (Atty. Docket No. XM 0006), assigned to the present assignee, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.




The receiver architecture of the referenced patent involves an analog mixing of RF signals to complex baseband for digital conversion. However, as is appreciated by those skilled in the art, the analog mixing of RF signals to complex baseband for digital conversion has inherent limitations related to the dynamic range of the input signals. In practice, these limitations often steer the receiver designer to digital conversion at an intermediate frequency at the expense of higher cost and size.




One such limitation of mixing analog signals to baseband is second order intermodulation products generated in the baseband mixers and post mixer amplifiers. These undesired products develop when two RF (or IF) signal components (f


1


and f


2


) present at the mixer input self-mix and the difference product (f


1


-f


2


) falls at baseband. If the amplitude of the difference product is sufficiently large, destructive interference with the desired baseband signal occurs.




A second limitation of analog mixing of RF signals to baseband is due to the fact that the conversion of RF signals to baseband using analog conversion results in the creation of images about 0 Hz axis due to gain and/or phase imbalance in the I and Q complex signal paths. The imbalance may be due to many causes including imperfect device matching, layout asymmetries, mechanical and process variations in present production RF circuit technology. Best case I/Q matching with standard bipolar integrated circuit processing results in a minimum image attenuation in the range of 30-40 dB. The image of the large amplitude signal creates destructive interference for the small signal. Those skilled in the art appreciate that a receiver operating in a typical land mobile environment will encounter substantially large signal amplitude variations due to the varied proximity to terrestrial transmitters.




Hence, there is a further need in the art for a receiver architecture for multiple signal reception which includes an analog conversion to baseband stage with image rejection capability effective to yield acceptable interference protection.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The need in the art is addressed by the system and method of the present invention. In general, the inventive system includes a receiver adapted to receive a signal having at least first and second carrier frequencies on which first and second information signals are modulated, respectively. The inventive receiver further includes circuitry for converting the received signal to a complex baseband signal.




In the illustrative embodiment, the received signal includes first and second ensembles. The first ensemble includes a first signal from a first source, a first signal from a second source and a first signal from a third source. The second ensemble includes a second signal from the first source, a second signal from the second source and a second signal from the third source. The receiver is adapted to selectively output the first and/or the second ensemble. Conversion of the band is achieved with quad mixers. The outputs of the mixers are digitized and selectively provided as the first and/or the second ensemble by a digital translation stage.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an illustrative implementation of a satellite digital audio service (SDARS) system architecture constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a diagram which illustrates the system of

FIG. 1

in greater detail.





FIG. 3



a


is a diagram which depicts a frequency plan for a two-satellite SDARS broadcast system utilizing the XM band in accordance with the present teachings.





FIG. 3



b


is a diagram which depicts the frequency plan of

FIG. 3



a


centered at baseband.





FIG. 4



a


is a diagram which depicts the CD Radio frequency plan.





FIG. 4



b


is a diagram which depicts the CD Radio frequency plan of

FIG. 4



a


centered at baseband.





FIG. 5

is a block diagram of an illustrative implementation of an SDARS receiver constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a detailed view of a receiver capable of receiving a single ensemble only.





FIG. 7

is a block diagram of a first embodiment of an SDARS receiver of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is an alternative embodiment of the SDARS receiver of FIG.


7


.





FIG. 9

is a block diagram of second alternative embodiment of the SDARS receiver of the present invention.





FIG. 10

is a block diagram of a third alternative preferred embodiment of an SDARS receiver incorporating the teachings of the present invention.





FIG. 11

is a diagram which illustrates the benefits of direct digital conversion.





FIG. 12

is a diagram showing an XM full waveform receiver adapted to receive audio and data simultaneously.











DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Illustrative embodiments and exemplary applications will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings to disclose the advantageous teachings of the present invention.




An illustrative implementation of a satellite digital audio service (SDARS) system architecture is depicted in FIG.


1


. The system


10


includes first and second geostationary satellites


12


and.


14


which transmit line-of-sight (LOS) signals to SDARS receivers located on the surface of the earth. The satellites provide for interleaving and spatial diversity. (Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in the alternative, the signals from the two satellites could be delayed to provide time diversity.) The system


10


further includes plural terrestrial repeaters


16


which receive and retransmit the satellite signals to facilitate reliable reception in geographic areas where LOS reception from the satellites is obscured by tall buildings, hills, tunnels and other obstructions. The signals transmitted by the satellites


12


and


14


and the repeaters


16


are received by SDARS receiver


20


. As depicted in

FIG. 1

, the receivers


20


may be located in automobiles, handheld or stationary units for home or office use. The SDARS receivers


20


are designed to receive one or both of the satellite signals and the signals from the terrestrial repeaters and combine or select one of the signals as the receiver output as discussed more fully below.





FIG. 2

is a diagram which illustrates the system


10


of

FIG. 1

in greater detail with a single satellite and a single terrestrial repeater

FIG. 2

shows a broadcast segment


22


and a terrestrial repeater segment


24


. In the preferred embodiment, an incoming bit stream is encoded into a time division multiplexed (TDM) signal using a coding scheme such as MPEG by an encoder


26


of conventional design. The TDM bit stream is upconverted to RF by a conventional quadrature phase-shift keyed (QPSK) modulator


28


. The upconverted TDM bit stream is then uplinked to the satellites


12


and


14


by an antenna


30


. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to the broadcast segment shown. Other systems may be used to provide signals to the satellites without departing from the scope of the present teachings.




The satellites


12


and


14


act as bent pipes and retransmit the uplinked signal to terrestrial repeaters


18


and portable receivers


20


. As illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the terrestrial repeater includes a receiver demodulator


34


, a de-interleaver and reformatter


35


, a terrestrial waveform modulator


36


and a frequency translator and amplifier


38


. The receiver and demodulator


34


downconverts the downlinked signal to a TDM bitstream. The de-interleaver and reformatter


35


reorders the TDM bitstream for the terrestrial waveform. The digital baseband signal is then applied to a terrestrial waveform modulator


36


(e.g. MCM or multiple carrier modulator) and then frequency translated to a carrier frequency prior to transmission.




As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the strength of the signal received close to the terrestrial repeaters will be higher than that received at a more distant location. A concern is that the terrestrial signal might interfere with the reception of the satellite signals by the receivers


30


. For this reason, in the best mode, a novel frequency plan such as that described below is utilized.





FIG. 3



a


is a diagram which depicts a frequency plan for a two-satellite SDARS broadcast system utilizing the XM band


40


in accordance with the present teachings. Each satellite transmits ensemble A and ensemble B. In accordance with the novel frequency plan of the present invention, two frequency slots


42


and


48


centered at frequencies


43


and


49


are assigned to the first satellite


12


and two frequency slots


44


and


46


centered at frequencies


45


and


47


are assigned to the second satellite


14


. In addition, two frequency slots


50


and


52


centered at frequencies


51


and


53


are assigned to the terrestrial repeaters


18


. Three frequency slots


42


,


44


and


50


each carry identical program content assigned to ensemble A and the three frequency slots


48


,


46


and


52


each carry identical program content assigned to ensemble B. As mentioned above, the repeaters


18


retransmit the signals received from satellite


12


as illustrated in FIG.


2


.




Returning to

FIG. 3



a


, note that the frequency slots


42


and


48


associated with the satellite


12


are separated from the frequency slots


50


and


52


associated with the terrestrial repeaters


18


by the frequency slots


44


and


46


associated with satellite


14


. In this manner, any satellite interference created by a terrestrial repeater transmission will primarily impact only the signal from satellite


14


and not the signal from satellite


12


. As will be appreciated by those skilled in this art, this facilitates reliable reception by a receiver even while located in close proximity to a terrestrial repeater.





FIG. 4



a


is a diagram which depicts the CD Radio frequency plan and

FIG. 4



b


is a diagram which depicts the CD Radio frequency plan of

FIG. 4



a


centered at baseband. As depicted in

FIGS. 4



a


and


4


b, the three signals contain identical program content. The terrestrial signal is at the center of the band with the signals from the satellites on either side.





FIG. 5

is a block diagram of an illustrative implementation of an SDARS receiver


20


constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. The receiver


20


includes an antenna module


100


, an RF tuner module


200


, a channel decoder


300


, a source decoder


400


, a digital control and status interface bus


600


, system controller


500


, data interface


700


, audio output circuit


800


, power supply


900


, and a user interface


1000


.




In order to appreciate the present teachings, reference is made to FIG.


6


.

FIG. 6

is a detailed view of antenna module


100


′ and tuner module


200


′ capable of receiving a single ensemble only. In the preferred embodiment, the system disclosed in

FIG. 6

is implemented in accordance with the teachings of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/435,317, entitled Tuner Architecture for Satellite and Terrestrial Reception of Signals, filed Nov. 4, 1999 by P. Marko and A. Nguyen (Atty Docket No. XM-0003), the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. The signal received by the antenna


110


′ of the antenna module


100


′ is amplified by a first low noise amplifier


122


′ prior to being input to a first image filter


124


′. The output of the first image filter


124


′ is input to a second low noise amplifier


126


′. The output of the second low noise amplifier


126


′ is fed back to the first low noise amplifier


122


′ via an automatic gain control (AGC) circuit


128


′ for gain stabilization as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. The output of the second low noise amplifier


126


′ constitutes the output of the antenna module


100


′ and is input to the tuner module


200


′ via an RF cable


130


′.




In the tuner module


200


′, a second image filter


201


′ receives the RF signal from the cable


130


′ and provides an input to a third low noise amplifier


202


′. The output of the third low noise amplifier


202


′ is input to a first mixer


208


′. The first mixer is driven by a dual resonator voltage controlled oscillator (VCO)


209


′. A dual resonator VCO is required in order to switch between the two ensembles. A splitter


225


′ supplies the output of the first mixer


208


′ to first and second intermediate frequency (IF) amplifiers


227


′ and


229


′. The first IF amplifier


227


′ is disposed in a terrestrial repeater signal processing path


231


′ and the second IF amplifier


229


′ is disposed in a second satellite signal processing path


233


′.




In each path


212


′ or


214


′, a surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter is disposed. The first SAW filter


212


′ isolates the signals from a selected ensemble received from a terrestrial repeater. The second SAW filter


214


′ isolates the signals from a selected ensemble received from both satellites. The output of the first SAW filter


212


′ and


214


′ is input to a back end integrated circuit (IC) which mixes the filtered signal down from a first intermediate frequency (IF


1


) to a second intermediate frequency (IF


2


). For example, for the terrestrial arm


231


′, IF


1


may be 209.760 MHz and IF


2


2.99 MHz.




In the satellite arm


233


′, the SAW filter is adapted to isolate the signals from a selected ensemble received from both satellites. For the satellite arm


233


′, IF


1


may be 206.655 MHz and IF


2


6.095 MHz. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to the frequencies illustrated in the present disclosure. The outputs of the backend ICs


235


′ and


237


′ are output to analog-to-digital (A/D) converters as per the embodiment of

FIG. 5

for digital processing. A channel decoder


300


′ (not shown) digitally separates and decodes the two satellite channels.




In addition to the use of a single SAW filter to process the two satellite signals, a novel aspect of the embodiment of

FIG. 6

is that since the satellite and terrestrial signals for ensemble A are the mirror image of the satellite and terrestrial signals for ensemble B, both signals can be received by using high side and low side injection into the first mixer


208


′ using


221


′ driven by the switched VCO


219


′. See the above-referenced patent application filed by P. Marko and A. Nguyen (Atty Docket No. XM-0003) for a detailed discussion of this feature.




While the architecture of

FIG. 6

is well adapted to receive a single ensemble at a time, in order to receive two ensembles at a time, it would be necessary to double the number of back ends (including the first mixer and every component thereafter).





FIG. 7

is a block diagram of a first embodiment of an SDARS receiver of the present invention. In the preferred embodiment, the full 12.5 MHz XM band containing the first and second ensembles are received in the receiver


200


via the antenna


110


, a low noise amplifier


122


and an image filter


124


as per FIG.


5


. The output of the image filter


124


is input to a first mixer


208


. The first mixer


208


is driven by a VCO


221


which, in the illustrative embodiment, operates at a frequency of approximately 1600 MHz. The actual output frequency of the VCO


221


will be substantially equivalent to two-thirds of the center frequency of the full 12.5 MHz frequency band received at the antenna


110


. If, for example, the center of the XM 12.5 MHz frequency band is 2338.750 MHz, the VCO should operate at two-thirds of 2338.750 MHz or 1559.167 MHz. The VCO is driven by a synthesizer


219


.




The mixer will have an approximate 800 MHz output which, in the illustrative embodiment, is filtered by a 12.5 MHz wide SAW filter


212


. Note that the use of a single SAW filter in place of the two SAW filters


212


′ and


214


′ of

FIG. 6

is one advantage of the implementation of FIG.


7


. The SAW filter


212


serves to select the entire XM band


40


(see

FIG. 3



a


) including both ensemble A and ensemble B.




The output of the SAW filter


212


is input to an automatic gain controllable (AGC) amplifier


228


. The gain of amplifier


228


is controlled by signal amplitude control stages (not shown) contained in demodulator blocks


317


,


318


and


319


. The output of the AGC amplifier


228


feeds quadrature mixers


230


and


232


. The quad mixers


230


and


232


are driven in-phase at the IF frequency of 800 MHz with injection in quadrature. The injection signal is derived from the 1600 MHz signal output by the VCO


221


via a divide by 2 quad generator


234


. Hence, the quad generator


234


serves as a quad local oscillator operating at 800 MHz.




Recall that the output of the SAW filter is centered at 800 MHz in the illustrative embodiment. Consequently, the effect of mixing the output of the SAW filter with an 800 MHz signal is to mix the full 12.5 MHz band centered at the 800 MHz IF output of the SAW filter down to baseband (centered at 0 MHz IF). A graphical representation of this baseband signal can be seen in

FIG. 3



b


. The two frequency slots assigned to satellite


12


are now centered at approximately ±5.2925 MHz, the two slots assigned to satellite


14


are centered at approximately ±3.4525 MHz and the two slots assigned to the terrestrial repeaters are centered at approximately ±1.2625 MHz.




Returning to

FIG. 7

, the outputs of the quad mixers


230


and


232


are amplified by post-mixer amplifiers


236


and


238


and input to low pass filters


240


and


242


, respectively. The quadrature (complex) baseband signals will have a bandwidth from 0 to +6.25 MHz. Hence, the low pass filters should be designed to have a rolloff at a frequency of approximately 6.25 MHz or higher. The low pass filters


240


and


242


may be implemented with simplicity as one or two stage resistive/capacitive (RC) filters.




The filtered I (in-phase) and Q (quadrature) signals, output by the filters


240


and


242


, are digitized by analog to digital converters (ADCs)


224


and


226


, respectively. In the illustrative embodiment, the ADCs must at a minimum be capable of digitizing signals in the frequency range of 0 to 6.25 MHz. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the outputs of the ADCs


224


and


226


constitute a digital complex baseband signal representing both ensembles (A and B) of the XM band and are ready for post processing. This digital representation can be applied to any of a number of digital selectivity elements.




In

FIG. 7

, the channel decoder


300


is shown as having three branches


302


,


304


and


306


for processing the signal from the terrestrial repeater


16


, satellite


14


and satellite


12


, respectively. Since channel decoder


300


in

FIG. 7

contains only three branches, only a single ensemble (A or B) at a time may be decoded. As each branch is similar (the filter bandwidth for the terrestrial repeater is wider than the bandwidth for the satellite), only one is described below for brevity. Each branch includes a complex mixer


311


which may be implemented with two mixers


312


and


313


driven by a complex numerically controlled oscillator CNCO


314


. The CNCO


314


is programmed to a frequency at the center of the frequency slot containing the satellite or terrestrial signal the branch is intended to receive. If for example branch


306


is intended to receive ensemble A of satellite


12


, CNCO


314


would be tuned to approximately.−5.29 MHz. With CNCO


314


tuned to −5.29 MHz and applied to complex mixer


311


, the output of complex mixer


311


will contain the frequency slot assigned to ensemble A of satellite


12


centered at 0 MHz.




System controller


500


(of

FIG. 5

) also serves to select ensemble A or ensemble B for further processing by tuning the CNCO


314


to negative frequencies for ensemble A and to positive frequencies for ensemble B.




The digital low pass filters


315


and


316


act as channel or selectivity filters that remove the components relating to the other frequency slots in the 12.5 MHz band and any other residue that manages to pass the SAW filter


212


. Hence, at this point, the signal for each branch for the selected ensemble (A or B) is isolated and ready for demodulation (signal extraction) by demodulators


317


,


318


, and


319


prior to being applied to a combiner


328


. The combiner applies error correction decoding to each of the demodulator outputs and takes the best of the three signals for output.




As illustrated in at the transport layer


320


in

FIG. 5

, in the preferred embodiment, the combiner uses a conventional Viterbi decoder (not shown) on soft decision bits from the first and second satellites


12


and


14


as, in the preferred embodiment, these signals are convolutionally encoded. Next, the Viterbi decoded signals are input to a Reed-Solomon decoder. The Reed-Solomon simply checks the validity or integrity of each codeword and applies corrections to a small percentage of errors. The RS decoded composite satellite signal is then ready for combination with the terrestrial repeater signal. (Those skilled in the art will appreciate that Viterbi decoders and Reed-Solomon decoders are well known in the art.)




Returning to

FIG. 7

, the stream at the output of the combiner


328


represents the bitstream that is to be multiplexed in the manner described more fully below. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the receiver of

FIG. 7

could be used to receive signals in the other assigned 12.5 MHz band (presently allocated to CD Radio) by simply tuning to the ‘CD’ band centered at 2326.25 MHz instead of the XM band centered at 2338.750 MHz. This would satisfy an FCC requirement that satellite radios be compatible across the entire 25 MHz digital broadcast spectrum. The digital filters would have to have a wider passband and the demodulators would have be changed to accommodate the CD Radio frequency plan. In an interoperable receiver, these changes could be realized with programmable filters and demodulators or with separate filter and demodulator paths, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.





FIG. 8

is an alternative embodiment of the SDARS receiver of FIG.


7


. The embodiment


200


* of

FIG. 8

is essentially identical to that of

FIG. 7

with the exception of the addition of a second VCO


235


* and a second synthesizer


237


*. In the illustrative embodiment of

FIG. 8

, the second VCO operates at 400 MHz. The use of two synthesizers eliminates the requirement that the 1


st


LO=2/3 the RF frequency. This allows for a lower frequency 1


st


IF which is programmable.





FIG. 9

is a block diagram of second alternative embodiment of the SDARS receiver of the present invention. The embodiment of

FIG. 9

is essentially the same as that of

FIG. 7

with the exception that each channel of each ensemble is provided for separately. That is, instead of simply retuning each CNCO from one ensemble to the other, three additional branches are provided


301


″,


303


″, and


305


″ and each CNCO


314


is tuned to a different channel for a single ensemble. With additional demodulators


322


″,


323


″, and


324


″ and an additional combiner


328


″ the system is capable of receiving both ensembles simultaneously. Both ensembles are received simultaneously without replication of the front-end circuitry including SAW filters, synthesizers and analog mixers. Another advantage of the architecture of

FIG. 9

is that the signal processing is implemented in the preferred embodiment in digital complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a significant advantage of a digital CMOS implementation resides in the fact that a digital CMOS implementation is on a very fast cost reduction path.





FIG. 10

is a block diagram of an alternative preferred embodiment of an SDARS receiver incorporating the teachings of the present invention. The receiver architecture


200


′″ of

FIG. 10

is similar to the receiver architecture


200


″ of

FIG. 9

with the exception that the receiver architecture


200


′″ of

FIG. 10

is a direct conversion architecture in which the SAW filter


212


″ of

FIG. 9

is eliminated. In addition, instead of using two local oscillators as per

FIG. 9

, the architecture of

FIG. 10

employs a single local oscillator


221


′″ which is driven to operate at twice the received frequency (e.g. 4800 MHz in the illustrative embodiment) by a synthesizer


219


′″ to provide a stable reference. (Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a crystal may be used for injection instead of a synthesizer, without departing from the scope of the present teachings, where the ability to move the reference frequency is not required.) The signal received by the antenna


110


′″ is amplified by a low noise amplifier


122


′″, input to a selectivity filter


124


′″, amplified by an AGC amplifier


228


′″ and applied to a quadrature mixers


230


′″ and


232


′″. Similar to the architecture of

FIG. 9

, the gain of amplifier


228


is controlled by signal amplitude control stages (not shown) contained in demodulator blocks


317


,


318


,


319


,


322


,


323


and


324


.




In the quadrature mixers


230


′″ and


232


′″, the RF signal, received at 2.4 GHz in the illustrative embodiment, is mixed with the 2.4 GHz quadrature local oscillator signals developed in quadrature generator


234


′″ by dividing down the 4.8 GHz local oscillator signal. Consequently, the received RF signal is converted directly to baseband. With the direct conversion architecture of

FIG. 10

, no image filter is required (as would be the case with the superheterodyne receivers of

FIGS. 7

,


8


and


9


) because the received signal is converted directly from RF frequency to baseband.




In each embodiment, the synthesizer outputs a reference frequency in response to the system controller


500


of FIG.


5


and thereby selects the XM radio band or the CD radio band of the digital broadcast spectrum as discussed above.




Returning to

FIG. 10

, the outputs of the quad mixers


230


′″ and


232


′″ are applied to post mixer amplifiers


236


′″ and


238


′″ and low pass filters


240


′″ and


242


′″. The low pass filters must be designed to handle the aliasing components which may be expected to result from an analog-to-digital conversion process implemented by ADCs


224


′″ and


226


′″. Low pass filters


240


′″ and


242


′″ will require a steeper rolloff than the low pass filters of

FIG. 9

, where additional anti-aliasing protection is available from SAW filter


212


″. The output of the ADCs is a complex bit stream for processing in the manner described above with reference to

FIGS. 8 and 9

.




The architecture of

FIG. 10

allows for the pursuit of improvements with respect to the tuner and the digital back end separately via a common interface


340


′″.




Those skilled in the art appreciate that analog mixing of RF signals to complex baseband for digital conversion has inherent limitations related to the dynamic range of the input signals. In practice, these limitations often steer the receiver designer to digital conversion at an intermediate frequency, as described in the architecture of

FIG. 6

, at the expense of higher cost and size. One such limitation of mixing analog signals to baseband is second order intermodulation products generated in the baseband mixers and post mixer amplifiers. These undesired products develop when two RF (or IF) signal components (f


1


and f


2


) present at the mixer input self mix and the difference product (f


1


-f


2


) falls at baseband. If the amplitude of the difference product is sufficiently large, destructive interference with the desired baseband signal occurs. With the architecture of

FIG. 7

, SAW filter


212


protects the baseband mixers from strong interfering signals outside the XM band, which can create second order intermodulation products. Within the XM band, signals received from the satellites will have low signal amplitude which will not generate significant second order intermodulation products. In the scenario where the receiver is in close proximity to a terrestrial repeater, the repeater signal amplitude may be sufficient to generate significant second order intermodulation products. However, since the repeater signal contains program content identical to the satellite signal, in the event second order intermodulation products from the repeater interfere with the satellite signal, the signal recovered from the repeater will have more than sufficient amplitude to insure an error free bitstream is available to the end user.




With the architecture of

FIG. 10

, the SAW filter is eliminated and close-in selectivity for second order intermodulation protection from out of band signals is not available. However, by direct translation of the full XM frequency band to 0 Hz, the low amplitude satellite signals are isolated in frequency from most second order intermodulation, products generated from out-of-band single carrier interferers, such as MCM carriers. This is evident by referring to the frequency plan of

FIG. 3



b


. Since the satellite


14


and satellite


12


receive slots are centered at ±3.45 MHz and ±5.29 MHz, after digital translation the satellite signals may be separated from lower frequency intermodulation products with the digital complex mixers and low pass filters described previously.




A second limitation of analog mixing of RF signals to baseband is illustrated in FIG.


11


. In

FIG. 11



a


, two RF signals, S


1


and S


2


, centered at frequencies F


1


and F


2


, respectively, are depicted with S


2


having substantially larger amplitude than S


1


. Assuming S


1


and S


2


exist in the digital domain,

FIG. 11



a


demonstrates the benefits of digital conversion to baseband. In

FIG. 11



b


, a complex digital mixer has recentered the frequency band containing S


1


and S


2


to 0 MHz. Since digital mixers behave similar to ideal mixers, a substantially ideal replication of the RF spectrum exists at complex baseband after the digital frequency translation.




As depicted in

FIG. 11



c


, the conversion of RF signals S


1


and S


2


to baseband using analog conversion results in the creation of images about 0 Hz axis due to gain and/or phase imbalance in the I and Q complex signal paths. The imbalance may be due to many causes including imperfect device matching, layout asymmetries, mechanical and process variations in present production RF circuit technology. Best case I/Q matching with standard bipolar integrated circuit processing results in a minimum image attenuation in the range of 30-40 dB. Referring back to the example depicted in

FIG. 11



c


, the image of the large amplitude signal S


2


creates destructive interference for the small signal S


1


. Those skilled in the art appreciate that a receiver operating in a typical land mobile environment will encounter substantially large signal amplitude variations due to the varied proximity to terrestrial transmitters. A receiver architecture for multiple signal reception which includes an analog conversion to baseband stage would yield unacceptable interference protection due to the limited image rejection problem described above. The inventive receiver overcomes this limitation by symmetrically positioning the satellite signals about the 0 Hz axis. Since the XM satellite signals (or CD Radio satellite signals) are received on the ground with low margin (normally less than 15 dB), the signal dynamic range is limited such that the image created by a maximum amplitude satellite signal will not interfere with a low level satellite signal received at the minimum amplitude for detection.





FIG. 12

is a diagram showing an XM full waveform receiver adapted to receive audio and data simultaneously. The signal from antenna


110


″ is received by the receiver


200


′″ of

FIG. 10

or the receiver


200


″ of FIG.


9


. The outputs of the receiver


200


′″ are first and second time-division multiplexed bitstreams A and B with approximately 100 channels of audio content and a number of data channels. The bitstreams are input to two types of demultiplexors broadcast


2010


and


2020


and data


2030


and


2040


. Through a switch


2050


, the user is able to select a broadcast channel from either ensemble A or B for listening pleasure as well as a data channel for informational purposes.




Returning briefly to

FIG. 5

, in the channel decoder IC the output of the combiner


328


is input to a service layer decoder


330


. In the service layer


330


, a demultiplexor


332


decrypts and extracts the desired channel information and provides digital audio and data to a separate source decoder


400


. The source decoder


400


provides digital audio to a digital-to-audio converter which applies an analog signal to an audio amplifier


840


and a speaker


860


. The data may be sent to a separate data interface


700


for external output or internal use. The system controller


500


has a man-machine interface


540


that controls the user interface


1000


. The interface


1000


also allows a user to control a conventional AM/FM radio, CD player or tape, the output of which is provided to the speaker


860


via the DAC


830


and amplifier/multiplexer


840


.




Thus, the present invention has been described herein with reference to a particular embodiment for a particular application. Those having ordinary skill in the art and access to the present teachings will recognize additional modifications, applications and embodiments within the scope thereof.




It is therefore intended by the appended claims to cover any and all such applications, modifications and embodiments within the scope of the present invention.




Accordingly,



Claims
  • 1. A receiver architecture comprising:first means for receiving a signal having at least first and second carrier frequencies on which first and second information signals are modulated, respectively, said first means including means for simultaneously receiving first and second ensembles, said first ensemble including a first signal from a first source, a first signal from a second source and a first signal from a third source and said second ensemble including a second signal from said first source, a second signal from said second source and a second signal from said third source; second means for converting said received signal to a complex baseband signal; and third means for outputting said complex baseband signal.
  • 2. The invention of claim 1 wherein said first means includes means for filtering said received signal.
  • 3. The invention of claim 2 wherein said means for filtering is an image filter.
  • 4. The invention of claim 2 wherein said means for filtering is a selectivity filter.
  • 5. The invention of claim 2 further including a quad mixer connected to the output of said means for filtering for providing first and second complex baseband outputs.
  • 6. The invention of claim 5 further including first and second low pass filters for filtering said first and second complex baseband outputs respectively.
  • 7. The invention of claim 6 wherein said third means includes means for digitizing said complex baseband outputs.
  • 8. The invention of claim 7 wherein said means for digitizing said complex baseband outputs includes first and second analog-to-digital converters.
  • 9. The invention of claim 1 further including means for selectively outputting said first and/or said second ensembles.
  • 10. The invention of claim 1 wherein said first means includes means for filtering said received signal.
  • 11. The invention of claim 10 wherein said means for filtering is an image filter.
  • 12. The invention of claim 10 wherein said means for filtering is a selectivity filter.
  • 13. The invention of claim 10 further including a quad mixer connected to the output of said means for filtering for providing first and second complex baseband outputs.
  • 14. The invention of claim 13 further including first and second low pass filters for filtering said first and second complex baseband outputs respectively.
  • 15. The invention of claim 14 wherein said third means includes means for digitizing said first and second complex baseband outputs.
  • 16. The invention of claim 15 wherein said means for digitizing said first and second complex baseband outputs includes first and second analog-to-digital converters.
  • 17. The invention of claim 1 wherein said third means includes means for digitizing said complex baseband signal.
  • 18. A satellite radio receiver architecture comprising:first means for simultaneously receiving first and second ensembles, said first ensemble including a first signal from a first source, a first signal from a second source and a first signal from a third source and said second ensemble including a second signal from said first source, a second signal from said second source and a second signal from said third source, said first means including: means for receiving a signal having at least first and second carrier frequencies on which first and second information signals are modulated, respectively and means for filtering said received signal; second means for converting said received signal to a complex baseband signal, said second means including a quad mixer connected to the output of said means for filtering for providing first and second complex baseband outputs; and third means for outputting said complex baseband signal, said third means including means for digitizing said complex baseband outputs; and fourth means for selectively outputting said first and/or said second ensembles.
  • 19. The invention of claim 18 wherein said first means includes means for filtering said received signal.
  • 20. The invention of claim 19 wherein said means for filtering is an image filter.
  • 21. The invention of claim 19 wherein said means for filtering is a selectivity filter.
  • 22. The invention of claim 19 further including first and second low pass filters for filtering said first and second complex baseband outputs respectively.
  • 23. The invention of claim 18 wherein said means for digitizing said complex baseband outputs includes first and second analog-to-digital converters.
  • 24. A method for receiving a satellite radio signal comprising the steps of:receiving a signal having at least first and second carrier frequencies on which first and second information signals are modulated, respectively, said step of receiving further including the step of simultaneously receiving first and second ensembles, said first ensemble including a first signal from a first source, a first signal from a second source and a first signal from a third source and said second ensemble including a second signal from said first source, a second signal from said second source and a second signal from said third source; converting said received signal to a complex baseband signal; and outputting said complex baseband signal.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
4977580 McNicol Dec 1990 A
5726974 Kunieda et al. Mar 1998 A
6078796 Ling Jun 2000 A
6167031 Olofsson et al. Dec 2000 A