The bioavailability of a drug is affected by a number of factors including its ability to be absorbed into the blood stream through the cells lining the intestines. There are a number of different in vitro assay options available to predict the gastrointestinal absorption property of drugs including a permeability assay, and a method known as PAMPA (Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay), which uses a lipid filled membrane to simulate the lipid bilayer of various cell types, including intestinal epithelium. These non-cell based permeability assays are automation compatible, relatively fast (4-24 hours), inexpensive, and straightforward. They are being used with increasing frequency to determine the passive, transcellular permeability properties of potential drug compounds. The majority of drugs enter the blood stream by passive diffusion through the intestinal epithelium. Consequently, permeability assays that measure passive transport through lipophilic barriers correlate with human drug absorption values from published methods.
Assays that predict passive absorption of orally administered drugs have become increasingly important in the drug discovery process. The ability of a molecule to be orally absorbed is one of the most important aspects in deciding whether the molecule is a potential lead candidate for development. Cell-based assays, like those using Caco-2 cells, are commonly used as a model for drug absorption; however, the technique is labor intensive and is often situated late in the drug discovery process. Assays described by Kansy and Faller have addressed these issues by providing rapid, low cost and automation friendly methods to measure a compound's passive permeability. Both permeability and PAMPA assays use artificial membranes to model the passive transport properties of the cell membrane. Other researchers have presented variations on Kansy's method, in some cases, improving on the correlation with a particular target (e.g., blood-brain barrier) or class of molecules. In general, the original assay has remained the same.
The devices used to carry out permeability assays include a filter plate containing one or more wells with a membrane barrier fixed to the bottom of each well, and a receiver plate configured to receive the filter plate in a nested relationship. Reagents and buffers are placed with the filter wells and the receiver wells at specific volume ratios so that accurate drug transport data can be analyzed. It is desirable to have the filter plate wells with membrane inserted into the receiver plate wells so that the media in the receiver plate wells will be at or close to equal level with the media in the filter wells. This creates hydrostatic equilibrium and minimized pressure differentials, which can cause uncontrolled or forced diffusion through the membrane. At a minimum however, the membrane must remain in contact with the liquid in the receiver plate during the experiment, including during incubation, shaking, and mixing. Cell culture assays (e.g., Caco-2) and non-cell based screening assays (e.g., PAMPA) are described in this manner. These devices also have non-cell based applications, which offer higher throughput compared to Caco assays, and require larger membrane areas to help achieve this.
Analysis is performed by reading directly in a transport assembly with UV or visual readers. It is therefore desirable to have a receiver plate that allows UV and visual light transmission. The protocol may also require shaking or other means of agitating the media, as well as extended incubation at room temperature. Handling of the device can be done manually or with automated plate handlers. In the latter case, the device needs to be compatible with the ANSI/SBS Microplate Standards (incorporated herein by reference) which apply mainly to the size, shape, and profile of the outer walls of the plate. These standards also restrict the well array by standardizing the distance between well centers and the location of the array relative to the outside of the plate.
Conventional receiver plates used in non-cell based PAMPA type assays include opaque acceptor plates and clear polystyrene receiver plates. Capillary wicking, cross contamination, volume control, evaporation, automation compatibility, and liquid recovery are problematic in these devices, however. The primary cause of cross contamination is the wicking of liquid in the small gap between each filter well and receiver well when the two plates are nested together, especially during incubation and shaking of the device. In conventional devices each receiver plate well has a circular cross section and thus forms a uniform capillary gap with a corresponding well of the concentrically nested filter plate, allowing for the wicking and cross contamination to occur. With these conventional devices, the cross-section is also uniform from the top to the bottom of the well, which increases the volume in the lower section of the well located under the membrane. Also with these conventional devices, the uniform capillary gap in the upper section of the well can hold only a minimum volume of media, and therefore when the device is assembled, there is a greater chance of displacing liquid out of the well, which leads to cross contamination. In the conventional devices, there are no features to assist in automated assembly and disassembly of the filter plate with the receiver plate. In conventional devices, the filter plate nests in the receiver plate such that there is a gap between the two, thus creating open paths to the atmosphere for evaporation of media from the receiver wells.
It therefore would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that reduces or eliminates capillary wicking and cross contamination.
It further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that readily accommodates visual readers.
It further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that minimizes the media volume requirements in the receiver plate.
It further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that can handle a wider range of receiver volumes such that the membrane remains in liquid contact and the media does not displace out of the wells when the device is assembled.
It further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that has features to assist in the automated assembly and disassembly of the filter plate.
It further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that will nest such that each filter well is centered within each receiver well with minimal variation during the course of the experiment.
It still further would be desirable to provide a receiver plate that minimizes the effects of evaporation of media from the wells during non-humidified incubation.
The problems of the prior art have been overcome by the present invention, which provides a multi-well assembly including a filter plate and a receiver plate. Each plate includes a plurality of wells, which, when the filter plate is placed in a nesting relationship with the receiver plate, each filter plate well has a corresponding receiver plate well into which it extends in nesting relationship. The receiver plate wells are of a non-uniform cross section along the height of the well. The cross-section of the upper portion of the receiver plate well is chosen to increase the gap between the outer walls of the filter plate wells and the inner walls of a corresponding receiver plate well when the receiver plate and filter plate are in a nesting relationship. This cross section creates a non-uniform gap such that the increased gap size reduces wicking and cross-contamination as well as increases the volume around the filter well to accommodate larger media volume variations. The lower portion of the receiver plate well has a reduced cross section compared to the upper portion, thus forming a non-uniform cross-section along the well height. This reduced volume lower section reduces the media required for the experiment. In a preferred embodiment, the cross-section of the receiver plate wells transitions from a square cross-section to a round cross-section. Preferably the portion of each receiver plate well that accommodates the filter plate well is square or substantially square in cross-section, and transitions to a circular or other geometric cross-section just below where the membrane on the filter plate well would be positioned when the filter plate is in nesting relationship with the receiver plate. The square cross-section also provides larger pathways for air to escape during assembly of the device. A square cross section maximizes the useable space between neighboring wells given a circular filter well and the limitations of ANSI/SBS restrictions on well spacing. A multi-section well of maximum cross-section in an upper region and a minimized cross-section in a lower region, with a gradual transition between the regions, is thus provided.
The multi-well assembly of the present invention also improves the repeatability of positioning the filter plate and receiver plate in proper nesting relationship, so that the filter wells are not eccentric with the receiver wells. The present invention also provides a means to improve automated assembly and disassembly by means of a lead-in feature. In addition, evaporation of media from the receiver wells is reduced by providing a flat surface-to-surface contact between the filter plate and receiver plate.
Turning first to
Where the upper region of the receiver plate is in a square cross-section, a suitable gap between the outer wall of a nested filter plate well 20 and the inner wall of a receiver plate well 21 at the four corners of the square is a maximum of 0.039 inches, depending on the corner radius chosen, with a minimum gap of about 0.010 inches at the four side walls. The minimum gap is dictated by the ANSI/SBS array spacing standard and the outside diameter of the filter plate well 21′.
Since wicking of fluid is not an issue in the region of each receiver well below where each filter plate well nests when in the assembled condition (e.g., in the region of each receiver plate well that is below the effective area of the membrane 30 of each filter plate well), the diameter and therefore the volume of this region can be smaller than the region that receives and accommodates each filter plate well. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, each receiver plate well 21 transitions from a larger diameter region 200 in the area that receives a filter plate well 20 to a smaller diameter region 201 in the area that is below where each filter plate well 20 nests. Although the particular shape of this region is not particularly limited and can include a teardrop shape, preferably this region of each receiver plate well 21 is circular in cross-section, in order to improve liquid recovery and to control the amount of media volume for the experiment. More particularly, were the square cross-section continued from the region that receives the filter plate well to the region below where the filter plate well nests, un-recovered media would become trapped in the well corners, especially during automated liquid removal in which a pipette is extracting liquid from a single location and tipping the plate is not possible. Since it is only necessary to have media directly under the effective membrane area, the diameter of the lower region of the receiver plate well can be substantially the same as the outer dimensions of the filter well 20, and preferably the same as the effective membrane diameter so that fluid can transfer between each filter well and corresponding receiver well, through the membrane, without obstruction, to this region of the receiver well. Preferably no region of the receiver plate well is less than the effective membrane area, so that the entire membrane surface remains visible to plate readers when viewed from the bottom of the plate.
The transition 60 from the larger diameter region to the smaller diameter region is preferably uniform in order to reduce hold up or un-recovered media. In the embodiment shown, the transition 60 results in angled wall sections 32 when cross sections are taken through corners of the square well, as shown in
Proper and reproducible placement of the filter plate wells within the receiver plate wells is important to avoid cross contamination, as eccentric nesting of the filter plate wells in the receiver plate wells can cause the gap between the wells to vary and allow wicking. Also, the well location needs to be properly maintained through the experiment during manual and automated handling, mixing, and shaking to prevent liquid sloshing, spilling, and wicking. Proper placement, particularly during automation, can be enhanced in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention by providing a chamfer 35 along the outside perimeter of the array of wells in the receiver plate 10. The chamfer functions to guide the outside edges of filter plate wells 20 into proper nesting relationship with the receiver plate wells 21. By locating the chamfer around the perimeter of the well array, various configurations of filter plates can be guided into place, even where the filter late has a skirt that would interfere with such a guide were it positioned about the outside edge of the receiver plate rather than about the periphery of the well array. Preferably the chamfer is formed at a 45° angle, sloping toward the wells as seen in
To further guide the assembly of the filter plate and receiver plate, positioning ribs or posts 40 can be provided in one or more, preferably at least two, wells of the receiver plate that mate with corresponding well support ribs or posts 41 in corresponding filter plate wells. The positioning ribs also provide a means of keeping the filter plate from moving or shifting during handling, mixing, and shaking. As best seen in
In order to reduce evaporation of media from the receiver wells, particularly from the peripheral receiver wells, the filter and receiver plates preferably are configured so that there is a flat surface-to-surface contact area between the plates to seal the wells. Thus, the area 50 that is peripheral to the chamfered lead-in 35 of the receiver plate is flat or planar (
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5096672 | Tervamaki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5141718 | Clark | Aug 1992 | A |
5516490 | Sanadi | May 1996 | A |
5650323 | Root | Jul 1997 | A |
5972694 | Mathus | Oct 1999 | A |
6083761 | Kedar et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
20030215956 | Reed | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 394 247 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 524 033 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2 259 655 | Mar 1993 | GB |
2006-231166 | Sep 2006 | JP |
0025922 | May 2000 | WO |
2004078352 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The Singapore communication dated May 28, 2007, with Australian Search Report dated May 18, 2007. |
Singapore communication dated Aug. 6, 2008. |
Chinese communication dated Apr. 27, 2010 in co-pending foreign application (200610084764.9). |
Japanese communication dated Aug. 3, 2010 in co-pending foreign application (JP2006-136441). |
India communication dated Jan. 23, 2009. |
Chinese communication dated Sep. 4, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060263875 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |