This invention relates generally to methods for improved mail distribution, and more particularly, to a mail distribution system which reduces the number of unwanted/unsolicited mail to recipients.
Traditionally, recipients (i.e., individuals, businesses and households) have had little opportunity to influence the number and/or type of mail that is received. Merely having a post office address has served as an open invitation to persons/companies desiring to communicate with the recipient. With the constant influx of unsolicited mail, the recipient can become desensitized to mail communications which are important to receive or desired by the mail recipient. Hence, it is common for such recipients to inadvertently discard important pieces of mail (i.e., the receipt of a credit card) believing them to be one of the many unsolicited mailpieces received on a daily basis.
While recipients are often frustrated by the plethora of mailpieces they receive, senders, on the other hand, would prefer to limit their mailings to a targeted audience of recipients most likely to respond in order to reduce mailing expenses while increasing yield (i.e., the number or recipients responding in a positive manner to the sender's messages). Without more information/communication from the recipients, the senders understand little about the messaging preferences of the recipients and their interests. Consequently, this dichotomy results in millions of unwanted/unsolicited mail pieces being discarded without being opened, depletes our natural resources (e.g., wood for paper) and places an increased burden on our environment (filling landfills and taxing recycling efforts).
Many factors place increased demands on the efficacy and effectiveness of mail communications by senders of unsolicited mail (e.g., mass mailings). For example, senders must compete for the mail recipient's attention due to the large influx of mail communications received daily. If the mail communication can not be comprehended or does not generate interest, it is probable that the mail recipient will move on to more important mail communications which may require their attention or action (e.g., their heating or lighting bill).
Inflation and other factors are constantly increasing the cost of the mail. Hence, the value of mail communications must be weighed against other, more targeted methods of communication (e.g., an advertisement in a magazine having an audience of readers which are most likely to purchase the consumer product). In an effort to support these activities and reduce the mailing costs, mail service providers (i.e., companies which augment or facilitate the delivery of mail, whether delivered by the US Postal Service or some commercial distribution mail service) now offer services which attempt to consolidate mass mailed messages/advertisements. Such consolidation is designed to take optimum advantage of discounts offered by the Postal service for bulk or volume delivery of mail. For example, a scheduled mass mailing of a golf resort advertisement may be well-suited for combination with a mass mailing of an advertisement for golf clubs. Consequently, through the consolidation services of the mail service provider, each party obtains fiscal advantages by sharing the mailing expenses.
Co-pending commonly-owned U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 09/588,763 entitled INFORMATION DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SENDERS WITH A RECIPIENT'S MESSAGING PREFERENCES (Attorney Docket No. F-160), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,640,773 entitled RECIPIENT CONTROL OVER ASPECTS OF INCOMING MESSAGES (Attorney Docket No. F-126), both address issues surrounding the control of incoming messages and methods for improving the effectiveness thereof. While these solutions offer significant improvement, each requires the use of various electronic devices, e.g., personal computers, web servers, etc.) which are not accessible to or in all households. Furthermore, to the extent that such delivery systems require the use of a computer to access these systems, the user must turn the computer on, wait while the computer processes its startup programs, log onto a web site, enter user profile information, etc.
Therefore, due to the foregoing, the recipients/senders are relegated to receiving/sending large volumes of mailpieces to ensure that a handful of interested recipients receive the mailpieces they desire or welcome.
A need, therefore, exists for a simple system designed to limit the amount of unwanted/unsolicited mail while, at the same time, providing fiscal advantages for the sender of the mailpiece, the delivery agent, and the mail services provider.
The present invention provides a mail delivery system which reduces the number and/or type of unwanted and unsolicited mail received by recipients The method does not rely on the use of electronic devices or other communication devices and can be employed within the current mail distribution infrastructure.
In accordance with the present invention, the mail delivery system employs a messenger for use in connection with an unsolicited mailpiece received by a mail recipient. The messenger functions to communicate a message to the sender of the unsolicited mailpiece that the recipient desires some change regarding future unsolicited mailings from the sender. The preference may include an instruction to discontinue future mail communications from the sender. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the messenger is disposed in combination with the unsolicited mailpiece and re-introduced into the mail distribution system by the mail recipient to communicate the mailing preference to the sender. Furthermore, a mail service provider may be employed to act on behalf of the mail recipient for the purpose of communicating this preference to the sender.
Therefore, it is now apparent that the present invention substantially overcomes the disadvantages associated with the prior art. Additional advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
Referring to
Upon receipt of the various mailpieces MA, MB & MC, the mail recipient 14 determines that mailpieces MB and MC are expected/important mail communications and are stored in a in-basket 15 for retention. Further, the mail recipient 14 notices that one of the mailpieces MA is from a Company A desiring to interest the mail recipient in a product offering. In the prior art, if the mail recipient was disinterested in the offering, the mail recipient 14 would discard the mailpiece MA and its contents in the trash 16, hoping that Company A would discontinue sending future mail communications.
In contrast to the prior art, the present invention employs a messenger 20 to enable the mail recipient 14 to communicate a mailing preference or instruction regarding future mail communications with Company A. In the context used herein, a “mailing preference” is any instruction or request to change the flow of mail from the sender to the mail recipient. Common examples may include changes to the frequency of communication (including discontinuation of mail communications), times of the year that mail communications are to be conducted (e.g., only during the December holidays) or subject matter such as a request to send catalogues on camping and other outdoor activities.
The messenger 20 may take a variety of forms and, in the broadest sense of the invention, is any physical manifestation of a mailing preference or instruction which may be read or otherwise understood by its recipient (which as will be discussed hereinafter, may be the original sender of the unsolicited mailpiece or a mail service provider). In one embodiment, and referring to
Further, the messenger 20 includes a means for conveying at least one mailing preference 24 to the sender of the unsolicited mailpiece MA. The mailing preference 24 may be communicated by any one of a variety of message conveying words, codes, indicia, or symbology. For example, the mailing preference 24 may be pre-printed, or printed by the mail recipient in a designated region, on the face of the label 22. Additionally, the mail preference 24 may be checked off from a list of preference options pre-printed on the face of the messenger 20. Alternatively, a mailing preference may be conveyed by simple color coded labels, e.g., red being indicative of an instruction to “stop”. future mail communications. Those skilled in the art of form or label design will readily appreciate a multiplicity of alternate embodiments falling within the means for conveying a mailing preference.
In the described embodiment, the messenger 20 is affixed to the face 29 of the mailpiece MA so as to conceal or cover the recipient's mailing address as printed on the original mailpiece MA by the sender Company A. To facilitate reading of the concealed address, the messenger 20 may include a portion which is easily removable to view the previous mailing address, e.g., a perforated flap or window.
In this embodiment, the messenger 20 includes contact information 26 of the mail service provider 30 operating in a liaison capacity between the mail recipient 14 and the sender, Company A.
Additionally, the messenger 20 may include prepaid postage 28 to further facilitate and promote its use. Inasmuch as postal authorities typically provide discounts on mailpieces containing machine readable, i.e., via electronic scanning), the messenger 20 may also have barcode indicia or other identifier to facilitate its delivery and handling within the mail distribution system. As such, the cost of mailing the modified mailpiece MA20 may be substantially reduced.
The discussion supra has described, the messenger 20 for use in connection with an unsolicited mailpiece MA and operative to convey the mailing preference to the sender Company A. The following discussion will emphasize the import and use of the messenger 20 in connection with a method for limiting the dissemination and delivery of unsolicited mailpieces in a mail distribution system.
The inventive method addresses the difficulty that a mail recipient 14, unfamiliar with various aspects of mail distribution, may experience in an effort to alter the course of future mail communications from a sender. Consequently, due their involvement in an array of specialized mail-related services, mail service providers are acknowledged to have greater access to and, perhaps, influence with respect to such senders. Consequently, such mail service providers 30 are uniquely qualified to act in a liaison capacity and are well-suited to effect the desired mail communication changes. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the mail service provider 30 serves to promote and enable the desired mail preferences.
In an initial step 100, and referring to
In step 110, mail recipient 14 acquires, whether by purchase or other means, the mail preference messengers 20. In the preferred embodiment, the purchase price of the booklet 34 will include prepaid postage 28 and a nominal fee for the mail service provider 30 act on behalf of the mail recipient 14.
In step 120, upon receipt of the unsolicited mailpiece MA from Company A, the mail recipient 14 affixes the messenger 20, as previously described, in combination with the mailpiece MA. Inasmuch as the messenger contains contact information, i.e., of the mail service provider, includes prepaid postage 28 and contains a mailing preference instruction 24, the now modified mailpiece is ready for mailing. In step 130, the mail recipient 14 then re-introduces the mailpiece into the mail distribution system for delivery.
In step 140, the mail service provider 30 receives the modified mailpiece MA20 from the delivery agent 12. Upon receipt of the modified mailpiece MA20, the mail service provider 30, having determined the intent of the mail recipient 14 from the messenger 20, proceeds, in step 150 to communicate the mailing preference 24 to the sender Company A. This communication step may be conducted in any of a variety of methods, including forwarding the messenger 20 to the sender, or otherwise contacting the sender via electronic communication devices such as e-mail, facsimile or telephone. Alternatively, mail service providers 30 may collect numerous messengers from numerous recipients 14 before forwarding the preferences to parties of interest which may include mail senders or address list providers. While the sender Company A will be under no obligation to honor the mailing preference of the mail recipient 14, it is logical to conclude that Company A will not continue mail communications to a disinterested mail recipient 14.
In step 160, the mail service provider 30 is in a unique position to gather mail preference data and, in step 170, offer a list of mail recipients 50 (see
In summary, the inventive method reduces the number of unsolicited mail communications in a mail distribution system, thereby decreasing the time required by mail recipients to read and examine incoming mail correspondence. Further, a reduction in unsolicited mailpiece volume provides enhanced effectiveness of other mail communications in the mail distribution system.
In addition to providing logistic workload benefits, the method of the present invention provides fiscal advantages for mail service providers, senders of unsolicited mailpieces and, potentially, delivery agents. Mail service providers benefit from the revenue derived from (i) offering packets, sheets or booklets of mail preference messengers, and (ii) the sale of mail preference lists to those desiring to modify there mailing lists. Senders of unsolicited mail can avoid the cost of mailing to disinterested mail recipients and focus efforts on a smaller audience. Inasmuch as the mail recipient re-introduces the unsolicited mailpiece into the mail distribution system, a higher volume of mail is handled, and consequently higher revenues received, by the delivery agent. It should be appreciated that the aim of the present invention is to reduce the volume of NEW UNSOLICITED mail not to reduce the overall volume of mail, In fact, the overall volume may increase appreciably. That is, as mail communications increase in the percentage of mailpieces having content desired by mail recipients, such communications can become the preferred vehicle for communicating messages by both mailers and mail recipients.
Finally, mail recipients and environmentalists can rejoice in the positive effects that a lower volume of undesired mail communications will have on the environment, That is, the demand for wood pulp is decreased, the volume of waste is reduced and the by-products of recycling diminished.
While, in the preferred embodiment, a mail service provider is best suited to provide or offer the messenger to mail recipients, a variety of interested parties may offer provide the messenger. For example, the postal authority, having an interest in affecting the quantity of mail it delivers, may make a messenger available to mail recipients.
Based on the above description and the associated drawings, it should now be apparent that the present invention improves many aspects of the exchange of messages between senders and recipients by facilitating the delivery of recipient preference information to senders.
Many features of the preferred embodiment represent design choices selected to best exploit the inventive concept as implemented in a particular messaging environment as pertaining to individual private recipients. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention to adapt the concepts of the present invention to address situations where the recipient is a business.
Therefore, the inventive concept in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details of the preferred embodiments described above, but is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.