The present invention relates to an attachment for reciprocating tools, such as reciprocating saws. More particularly, the present is an offset attachment that permits a reciprocating tool to be fit with a variety of blades, sanders, and the like to attack a point from an offset angle.
Conventional reciprocating tools allow the user to attack a point straight on, or in other words, in a direct line from the tip of the reciprocating tool to the point. While a typical blade can be affixed in the center of the reciprocating tool, the body of the reciprocating tool oftentimes interferes with the surfaces around a point of attack.
For example, if a user wants to use a reciprocating tool to cut a two inch by two inch section in a dry wall area so that the two inch by two inch section is adjacent to a floor, the user cannot easily do so with a reciprocating tool. Because the saw blade extends out of the center front of the reciprocating tool, and the reciprocating tool has a bulky mass, the user can only make such a cut into the drywall at an angle away from ninety degrees. The best way to cut into the drywall is to maintain the saw blade perpendicular to the dry wall; however, because the reciprocating tool must remain above the floor, the user must approach the drywall so that the point of attack varies from ninety degrees from the drywall. Varying from a perpendicular point of attack, the user's cut is less reliable, less controlled, and encroaches into the drywall unevenly.
Restated, the problem is that the user cannot possibly position the reciprocating tool perpendicular to the drywall because the housing of the reciprocating tool must remain above the floor. There is a need for a device that allows reciprocating tool attachments perpendicular access to spaces wherein the mass of the reciprocating tool interferes with the normal point of attack.
In the past, users have attempted to create attachments capable of making cuts near an object while maintaining a perpendicular point of attack; however, such attachments have been either not rigid enough in order to effectuate a straight cut (that is, the saw attachments bend under the pressure of the saw attachments entering the drywall), have been too rigid thereby preventing the user from completing the cut all the way into a corner (that is, the saw attachments cannot be adjusted or interchanged as access to points of attack vary), or have been so complicated that they would break—and when broken, would be very expensive to fix. Thus, there is a need for a requisitely rigid offset attachment for a reciprocating tool that can be adjusted or interchanged easily that is not so complicated that the cost is prohibitive should it become damaged.
It has also been seen that, if there is sufficient weight, the use of an offset blade in the fashion previously described may create torque on the end of the blade or other tool that is placed in said offset, when the blade is moved back and forth. The torque is caused by a weight imbalance and results in the tool in the offset device to move in to a widening S shaped shimmy. Thus there is seen to be a need for an offset tool adapter that may be adjustable in the horizontal, and or vertical plane and uses adjustable weights to balance the increased or decreased weight of any tool placed in the offset adapter providing for movement without any shimmy.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,028,890 issued on Apr. 10, 1962, to G. E. Atkinson, et al. describes a power saw which accepts a blade in both the center position and offset on the edge of the blade holders. Atkinson's blade holder is inferior to the present invention as Atkinson's blade holder can only adjust to various positions in line with the power saw; it is ill suited to make a cut in a wall at the point where the wall touches the floor because there is very little room to maneuver the body of the power saw. Further, Atkinson's blade holder does not offer any extension of the blade forward, so that the power saw can remain a greater distance from the cut while cutting.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,260,290 issued on Jul. 12, 1966, to R. Happe , et al. describes a power saw attachment which accepts a blade for an offset position. However, Happe's device uses a guide rod which shortens the cut of the blade and does not allow the blade to be as flexible as desired. Further, Happe's device does not allow for different and varied blade placements and offsets.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,306 issued on Nov. 19, 1985 to Mineck describes a reciprocating offset blade. Although Mineck's offset blade adapter does allow for the blade to be placed in more then one position, one of which is that of the flush cut, Mineck's adapter does so through a complicated device that, once broken, is expensive to replace. Further, Mineck's adapter does not allow for different and varied blade placements and offsets, and does not extend the distance between the blade and the reciprocating tool.
Thus, there is a need for an offset tool adapter for a reciprocating tool capable of distancing offset tool attachments from the offset tool itself (i.e. adding inches onto the length of the offset tool attachment) while remaining stable. Further, there is a need for an offset tool adapter that allows various positioning so that the angle of attack to make a cut, etc. can be altered. Also, there is a need for an offset tool adapter that allows for quick interchangeability so that various offset tool attachments can be employed in short amount of time.
The present invention is an attachment for reciprocating tools that allows blades, sanders, or any other device associated with a reciprocating tool to be quickly interchanged. The present invention has spaces common devices for reciprocating tools in different but parallel plane to the plane of the reciprocating tool. Thus, the user can access areas typically unreachable because with the present invention, the user can hold the reciprocating tool's body in a different plane than the device attached to the reciprocating tool. The present invention preferably has a 45 degree angle shift between the plane of the reciprocating tool and the plane of the device attached to the reciprocating tool. The angle provides a good blend of offset distance, structural integrity, and extension of the device ahead of the reciprocating tool. The distance of the angle shift is adjustable and can be used as a quick-change method. The length of the inline extension before the angle shift is also adjustable and weight may be added at end of the angle shift on either the outside or inside of the plane of the device attached to the reciprocating tool.
As seen in the attached drawings, the present invention is designed to be used with any power driven saw (10) having a reciprocating drive member (20). The present invention has an offset adapter (30) made up of a first, second, and third metal planes (40, 50, 60), two angle braces (70, 80), a conventional set screw (90), and a set screw receiving member (100).
The first straight metal plane (40) is designed to insert into the reciprocating drive member (20) and has the standard hole (25) used for locking any reciprocating saw blade into a reciprocating drive member (20). The second straight metal plane (50) is disposed anywhere from 90 degrees to 45 degrees from the first metal plane (40), and the second straight metal plane (50) is correspondingly attached to the third metal plane (60) anywhere from 90 degrees to 45 degrees from the third metal plane (60).
The first metal plane (40) and third metal plane (60) are, at all times, parallel with each other. In the embodiment shown in
The first metal plane (40) in
As has been intimidated, though not discussed in detail is the fact that a change in the weight of the offset (600) requires a change in the length of the first metal plane (40) in order to achieve the correct balance. In the current version of the invention (10) if the weight of the offset (600), which includes any attached tool combined is 0.72 lbs, then it will be balanced. The entire following math derives from this assumption as well as the environment being 600 RPM or 6.5 strokes per second.
It has been found that every time the first metal plane (40) is extended 1 inch, 0.04 lbs of weight must be removed from some part of the invention (10), which is not inline for the device to be balanced. This assumes no weight is being used in the opposite direction (500) of the offset (600) as previously discussed.
For example:
If the first metal plane (40) is extended by 4 inches then one would subtract 0.044 times or multiply 4×0.04 which would result in 0.16 lbs which is then subtracted from our base weigh of 0.72. providing us with 0.56 lbs. as the allowed weight on the offset (600) where in the offset (600) will be balanced. This would be written out mathematically as:
0.72−(4.0 in×0.04 lbs)=0.56 lb.
Interestingly enough, it has been found that the 0.72 lbs always corresponds to the 0.72° that is the angle of the second straight metal plane (50) when it is 1.5 inches in length. This therefore allows us to know any corresponding weight, distance or angle of the second straight metal plane (50) that will make the tool balance. For example:
With a first metal plane (40) being extended 12 inches and a second metal plane (50) that is 1.5 inches the formula would look as follows:
0.72−(12×0.04)=0.24
With a first metal plane (40) being extended 12 inches and a second metal plane (50) that is 2.0 inches the formula would look as follows:
((0.72−(12×0.04))/3)×4=0.32
It should of course be understood that when using these numbers we are working in a “perfect world” and that in the real world the same brand of saw or extension made with the same process from the same manufacturer will have different weights and as such a tolerance of plus or minus 0.1 lbs must be accepted. It is this tolerance, which makes the use of the ability to add a variable weight in the opposite direction (500) of the offset (600) in combination with the latter formula so attractive.
It should also be understood that a very light blade or tool may be put out on the market which would require weight to be added to the offset (600). Of course this weight could be added in a number of different spots and no particular spot on the inside of the offset (600) is superior to any other. One would of course not want to put any additional weight on the outside of the offset (600) in such a fashion as it would be impossible to place the offset (600) flat against the surface being cut. The configuration of the weight (not shown) which could be added may be of just about any configuration, however the preferred method would be thin metal plates which may attach magnetically to the offset (600) and which may be added in very small increments.
As can be seen from the prior discussion, it is contemplated that there would never be a saw or other attachment that would make the combined weight of the offset (600) more then 0.72 lbs. However, using the same concepts and similar math, the tool could be re-engineered to accept tools of any weight.
The third metal plane (60) is designed to accept a standard blade (110) in the same fashion as that of the reciprocating drive member (20) by using a conventional set screw (90) and a set screw receiving member (100). Set screw receiving member (100) is a U-shaped piece of metal that sandwiches standard blade (110) when standard blade (110) is held adjacent to third metal plane (60).
Alternative embodiments of the invention are many and varied. The first, second, and third metal planes (40, 50, 60), may be lengthened or shortened depending on the type of power driven saw (10) employed and depending on the additional offset length or reach desired. Further the angles between the first, second, and third metal planes (40, 50, 60) may also be changed in order to allow the user to make cuts at numerous angles. As the adapter (30) is inexpensive to manufacture, and is quite simple in design, many different lengths of first, second, and third metal planes (40, 50, 60) may be provided in a box in much the same fashion as drill bits are conventionally sold.
It should be noted that no matter the format of the adapter (30), it is always able to fit into a conventional power driven saw (10). As aforementioned, in
An alternative embodiment of the present invention has second metal plane (50) and angle braces (70, 80) merged as one piece with greater girth, so that merged together, they appear as a trapezoid (200), as shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention has third metal plane (60) deleted because trapezoid (200) is specially modified to communicate with file (210). This embodiment allows the adapter (30) to hold other implements such as file (210), sanders, or any other device that can fit in slot (215) and be conventionally bolted via first bolt (220) and second bolt (230).
An additional embodiment, as shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment, second bolt (230) can be turned by the user's fingers to move through trapezoid (200) and contact blade trapezoid (300). This is significant because blade trapezoid (300)—as shown in
In another embodiment the offset (600) may be rotated. In this case angle braces (70, 80) are replaced with a locking rotating screw (not shown). (Please note, a rotating screw which locks with a pin is conventionally known and there are numerous other methods to allow the active edge of the tool to be rotated. Of course, the piece that allows this rotation may be made an integral part of the device or may simply be an attachment that allows for the tool (700) itself to be attached to the attachment.) There are of course numerous methods of allowing this part of the device to turn and lock in many positions. Some of the known methods may be seen in US20040119352A1 or US4583907 among many others as well as the conventionally known ratchet and lock method used in many tools.
In another embodiment the offset (600) may be rotated at the joint where the third metal plane (60) and the second metal plane (50) meet. In this embodiment the third metal plane (60) may be attached and rotate in the exact same fashion as in the previous embodiment, i.e. through known methods. The advantage to this embodiment is that it allows the tool to affect a surface that is not only set away from the inline of the reciprocating saw, it also may do so to surfaces that are on different planes.
In another embodiment the third metal plane (60) of the offset (600) is attached in the same fashion as in any of the previous embodiments, however it (60) is designed to extend horizontally in line with the reciprocating saw. The advantage to this embodiment is it allows the use of the reciprocating saw in a hard to reach space, possibly behind a wall, pipe or other obstruction. This same embodiment may also include the former embodiment allowing the third metal plane (60) to rotate, allowing any of the surfaces to be affected.
In another embodiment the third metal plane (60) of the offset (600) is attached to the second metal plane (50) with a joint (not shown as known) which allows the third metal plane (60) to flex up to 30 degrees to the left or right of center and lock in any of such positions. It is further contemplated that the rotating capabilities discussed above may be insinuated preferably before though possibly after this joint.
In
In another embodiment of the invention, multiple tools may be placed in the end of the offset (600) allowing for multiple cuts to be made at the same time. As shown in
The present invention is not limited to the embodiments aforementioned, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
Priority is hereby claimed to PCT/US04/09432 filed on Mar. 30, 2004, as well as to 11/037,888 filed on Jan. 18, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11037888 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 10908631 | May 2005 | US |
Parent | PCT/US04/09432 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 10908631 | May 2005 | US |