Claim is made to the filing date of Oct. 11, 2014 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/062,852 for all subject matter disclosed and claimed in the present application that is disclosed in said Provisional Patent Application.
The present invention relates to exercise machines, and more particularly to exercise machines that provide reciprocating, dual-directional, negative resistance, movement for sequential alternate exercise of opposing muscle groups for enhanced results in exercising the arms, chest, and back of the user.
Many machines for exercising arms, chests, and backs of users have been developed in recent years. For example, German Patent No. DE 3532444, issued Mar. 19, 1987, discloses an exercise machine having pivotally swinging training arms that reciprocate through active and passive movements with a maximum force capacity greater than the force that can be imparted by the user. It includes a recording device that detects and displays the angle-dependent force exerted by the user.
Exerbotics, LLC has developed a chest press/row machine, as advertised on its exerbotics.com website, having reciprocating pivoted arms that can be selectively powered for either pulling or pushing, and includes means for detecting and displaying the amount of pressure being exerted by the user.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,578,774, issued Aug. 25, 2009, discloses an exercise machine adding a bar that reciprocates vertically op and down, and is powered by a motor to reciprocate at a constant rate, with the capacity of force being applied by the motor being greater titan the press or pull of the user.
Other examples of exercise machines having a drive mechanism driven at a constant rate regardless of the resistive force applied by the user are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,740, issued Feb. 1, 2000, U.S. Pat. No. 4,930,770, issued Jan. 5, 1990, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,919,418, issued Apr. 24, 1990.
None of these prior art disclosures have pivotable hand gaps that allow repositioning of the hands of the user, without releasing the handle, from a position for pushing against movement of exercise arms toward the user to exercise a particular set of muscles and a reversed position of the hands for pulling against movement of exercise arms away from the user to exercise a different set of muscles. Universally pivotable hand grips are disclosed in the prior an, such as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,344,374, issued Sep. 6, 1994, U.S. Pat. No. 5,407,405, issued Apr. 18, 1995, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0082448, published Apr. 29, 2004. However, none of these universally pivotable hand grip disclosures are for the purpose of alternately positioning the hands of the user for applying resistance to an exercise arm moving toward the user for exercising one set of muscles and positioning the hands of the user for applying resistance to an exercise arm moving away from the user for exercising a different set of muscles.
Further, there is no known disclosure in the prior art of controlling the rate of reciprocation of said arms during a set of reciprocations in a pattern, selected by the user, of incrementally increasing rates of reciprocation during sequential repetitions of a set of repetitions to simulate the fatigue factor occurring when a user is exercising with free weights.
The exercise machine of the present invention has reciprocating arms mounted on a frame for exercising the arms, chest, and back of the user and has pivotally mounted hand grips on the arms that allow repositioning of the hands of a user without having to release and regrasp the grips when the arms reciprocate in alternate strokes of reciprocation for exercise of alternate opposing muscle groups during alternate strokes, such as exercising the pectoralis major muscles of the user during one direction of reciprocation of said arms and exercising the latissimus dorsi muscles of the user during the opposite direction of reciprocation of said arms.
The hand grips are preferably universally pivotable for free positioning of the hands m any comfortable position during exercise, as well as for repositioning when the arms reciprocate.
In the preferred embodiment, the arms have inner portions pivotally attached to the frame and driven by an actuator to cause the inner portions to reciprocate toward and away from each other, and outer portions pivotally attached to the outer ends of the inner portions, with the hand grips being attached to the outer portions. The pivotal attachment of the inner portions to the frame correspond s generally to the shoulders of the user. The pivotal attachment of the outer portions of the inner portions is at a location generally corresponding to the elbows of a user. The hand grips are disposed generally at the location of the hands and wrists of the user. With tins arrangement the movement of the articulated arms simulate the pivoted flexing movement of the arms of the user, and the arms can accommodate therebetween different users having different shoulder widths and stroke lengths. The pivoted connection of the outer arm allows a user to simulate close grip, wide grip, and reverse grip hand positioning, and can simulate pectoral flyes.
The arms are reciprocated by the actuator that applies a force to move the arms with an applied capacity greater than the resistive force applied by the user. The resistive force applied by the user is measured by a load cell and displayed by a computer processing unit for observation by the user.
The computer processing unit is mounted on the frame and is operatively connected to the actuator to control reciprocation of the arms as selected by the user to provide a desired intensity of exercise in a pattern, selected by the user, of incrementally increasing rates of reciprocation during sequential repetitions of a set of repetitions to simulate the fatigue factor of exercising with free weights. In one embodiment the computer processing unit provides three patterns for selection by the user. One pattern provides relatively slow rates of reciprocation for relatively long application of resistive force for endurance exercising. A second pattern provides relative fast rates of reciprocation for relatively short application of resistive force for strength exercising. A third pattern provides intermediate rates of reciprocation for intermediate application of resistive force for muscle size exercising.
In a preferred embodiment, the body support mounted on the frame is inclined and concavely curved for supporting the back of a user in an inclined concave position for optimum positioning of the user for exercising on the machine.
In another embodiment of the present invention an armrest is mounted on a frame for supporting the elbows and adjacent portions of the upper arms of a user. The machine has an arm mounted on the frame in general alignment with die intended position of the elbows of the unit. Universally pivoted handgrips, which are the same as the hand grips of the first embodiment, are attached in spaced relation on the ends of a cross bar mounted on the outer end of the pivoted arm. An actuator controlled by a computer processing unit reciprocates the arm at a constant rate of reciprocation at a force greater than the resistive force applied by the user. This embodiment allows relocating the hands of the user for alternate exercise of opposing arm muscles during the alternate strokes of reciprocation.
The reciprocating, dual-directional, negative resistance, exercise machine 10 of the preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Pivotally mounted on the frame 12 is an operating unit 32, best illustrated in
The operating unit 32 includes an actuator 48 having mounted thereon a continuous dynamic load electric motor 50 that linearly reciprocates a screw piston 52, which is connected by drive rods 54 to the inner portions 36 of the operating arms 34 outwardly of the inner ends 38 of the inner portions 36 to create arcuate reciprocation of the inner portions 36 of the operating arms 34 toward and away from each other, resulting in the outer portions 44 of the operating arms 34 reciprocating away from and toward the frame 12 when extended by a user grasping hand grips 56 pivotally attached at outer ends 58 of the outer portions 44 of the operating arms 34.
The motor 50 is controlled by a conventional computer processing unit 60 to reciprocate the arms at rates of reciprocation selected by the user with a maximum force greater than the force exerted by a user through the hand grips 56 to exercise by attempting to resist movement of the operating arms 34. Thus, the operating arms 34 continue to reciprocate at the selected rate of reciprocation regardless of the resistive force applied by the user.
The pivotable hand grips 56 allow reverse manipulation of hand positions during reversal of reciprocation without having to release and regrasp the grips when the actuator reverses reciprocation of the arms. For example, in one direction of reciprocation the user can exercise his pectoralis major muscles, and in the other direction of reciprocation the user can exercise his latissimus dorsi muscles.
Preferably, the hand grips 56 are universally pivotable to permit free positioning of the hands of the user in comfortable positions at all times during exercise on the machine, as well as facilitating the reversal of hand positions without having to release and regrasp the hand grips when reciprocation is reversed.
An exploded view of a universally pivotable hand grip 56 is illustrated in
A load cell 62 is mounted on the actuator 48 for sensing the resistive force being applied by the user. The computer processing unit 60 is connected to the load cell 62 for receiving an indication of the amount of sensed resistive force, which the computer processing unit 60 displays on a display panel 64 positioned for observation by a user during exercise. This allows the user to see, in real time, the force being applied, where in the reciprocation the resistive force is strongest, and where in the reciprocation the resistive force is weakest. Thereby giving the user not only the ability to see what the maximum and minimum reciprocation strengths are, but allows the user to see where, within the reciprocation, improvement is needed.
The sequence of reciprocation of the operating anus 34 with a user U applying a resistive force in exercising is illustrated in
The computer processing unit 60 controls the rate of reciprocation of the operating anus 34 during a set of reciprocations in a pattern, selected by the user, of incrementally increasing rates of reciprocation during sequential repetitions of a set of repetitions. Preferably, the computer processing unit is programmed for selection by the user of a desired one of a plurality of patterns having different sequentially increasing rates of reciprocation of the operating arms 34. In a representative embodiment the plurality of patterns includes three patterns. One pattern provides incrementally increasing relatively slow rates of reciprocation, resulting in relatively long periods of time for relatively long application of resistive force during each incrementally decreasing length of reciprocation, which provides endurance exercising. A second pattern provides incrementally increasing relatively faster rates of reciprocation, resulting in relatively short periods of time for each relatively short application of resistive force during each incrementally decreasing time of reciprocation, which provides strength exercising. A third pattern provides incrementally increasing intermediate rates of reciprocation, resulting in relatively intermediate length periods of time for relatively intermediate length periods of application of resistive force during each incrementally decreasing time of reciprocation, which provides muscle size exercising, from stimulation of sarcoplasmic fluid expansion.
A specific example of three patterns to give the user a different experience and work towards different goals are:
1) MAX ENDURANCE and NEURAL-MUSCULAR REHAB: 10 repetitions in each direction per set as: 10 seconds, 10 seconds, 9 seconds, 8 seconds, 7 seconds, 6 seconds, 5 seconds, 4 seconds, 3 seconds, 2 seconds for a total time under tension of 64 seconds in each direction, alternately 64 seconds for chest exercise and 64 seconds for upper back exercise. This exercise increases muscular endurance in response to glycogen depletion, enhancing the efficiency of ATP re-uptake/use.
2): MAX SIZE; 8 repetitions in each direction per set as: 9 seconds, 8 seconds, 7 seconds, 6 seconds, 5 seconds, 4 seconds, 3 seconds, and 2 seconds for a of total time under tension of 44 seconds in each direction, alternately 44 seconds for chest exercise and 44 seconds for upper back exercise. This increases muscle size caused by sarcoplasmic fluid expansion.
3) MAX STRENGTH: 5 repetitions in each direction per set as: 6 seconds, 5 seconds, 4 seconds, 3 seconds, and 2 seconds for a total time under tension of 20 seconds in each direction. This pattern increases strength caused by Myofibrillar Hypertrophy, also known as fiber splitting.
In these patterns, each set incrementally diminishes in time, simulating the feel of free weight exercise. In free weight exercise, the user at first has no problem lowering the weight at a controlled pace, but as a set continues, the weight will seem to get heavier with each repetition, due to fatigue. The user will be losing control of how slow the user can lower the weight, struggling until the user reaches a point where the user can no longer control the rate of descent. This effect is avoided with the machine of the present invention by decreasing the time for each repetition in each pattern, giving the user at first the feeling of slowing the machine down, which of course the user is not, and as the reciprocations increase in rate the user will have the psychological motivation to continue applying resistance, rather than succumbing to failure because of fatigue.
A typical sequence of screens displayed on the display panel 64 is illustrated in
Another embodiment of the exercise machine of the present invention is illustrated in
At the opposite ends of the crossbar 98 hand grips 104 are mounted. These hand grips 104 are identical to the hand grips 56 of the embodiment of
In view of the foregoing written description of the present invention, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention is susceptible of broad utility and application in many embodiments and adaptations other than those herein described without departing from the substance or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, while the present invention has been described herein in detail in relation to preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is only illustrative examples of the present invention and is made merely for purposes of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the invention, the present invention being limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4099713 | Spector | Jul 1978 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jan 1990 | A |
4919418 | Miller | Apr 1990 | A |
5344374 | Telle | Sep 1994 | A |
5407405 | Oren | Apr 1995 | A |
5971895 | Habing | Oct 1999 | A |
6019740 | Hausman | Feb 2000 | A |
6244999 | Alessandri | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D445851 | Diakonov | Jul 2001 | S |
D520575 | Diakonov | May 2006 | S |
7094186 | Diakonov | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D535336 | Diakonov | Jan 2007 | S |
7563214 | Webber | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578774 | Zetterberg | Aug 2009 | B1 |
8075459 | Axelsson | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20040082448 | Litman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20100216600 | Noffsinger | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3532444 | Mar 1987 | DE |
Entry |
---|
EXERFBOTICS LLC, exerbotics.com website discloding Chest Press/Row Machine. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170100628 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |