Embodiments of the invention relate to a shaving razor. More particularly, embodiments of the invention relate to a shaving razor having reciprocating blades.
There are two main classes of shaving razors that dominate the market. There are electric razors, which have one or more cutting implements behind a screen or other protective barrier, where the cutting elements are powered to, for example, spin such that hair penetrating the screen or barrier is cut. The advantage of these types of razors is after the initial purchase, a large number of shaves are possible without replacing the device or parts thereof. Unfortunately, electric razors are typically somewhat bulky, making it difficult to get into tight spaces, for example, around a user's nose. Additionally, even in open spaces such as a user's cheek, the closeness of the shave generally does not match that which is possible with exposed-blade razors. This lack of closeness is due at least impart to the dimension of the barrier. Even relatively thin micro-screens have a thickness that dictates the maximum closeness of the shave. That is, the shave can be no closer than the thickness of the screen.
The second class of razors in common use today is exposed-blade razors, which have one or more blades arranged in a cartridge. A user pulls the cartridge across the area to be shaved, and the blades provide a shave that is generally closer than possible with an electric razor, owing to the fact that the blades are in direct contact with the user's skin and the dimension of the protective shield of the electric razors need not be accommodated. Commonly, three, four, or even five blades are aligned to cut in the same shaving direction. Even where multiple blades are present, the leading blade performs most of the cutting. As used herein, “leading” when modifying blade refers to the first blade to come in contact with the hair in the direction of shaving. As a result, the leading blade dulls more quickly than the other blades. Often, the dullness of the leading blade requires replacement of the cartridge while the remaining blades are perfectly serviceable.
Some razor manufacturers have come up with “power” models of their exposed blade razors. These razors include a battery in the handle and a motor with an eccentric mass such that when powered, the entire razor vibrates. In these models, the blades do not actually move; rather, the entire device vibrates. This feature has been heavily advertised, but market research reflects that it fails to provide any real benefit to the user, and the majority of users do not replace the battery once it goes dead. Studies have not revealed that power models have longer cartridge life or improved cutting efficacy over the unpowered models. Rather, these “power” exposed blade razors appear to be little more than a marketing gimmick.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that different references to “an” or “one” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references mean at least one.
Several embodiments of the invention with reference to the appended drawings are now explained. Whenever the shapes, relative positions and other aspects of the parts described in the embodiments are not clearly defined, the scope of the invention is not limited only to the parts shown, which are meant merely for the purpose of illustration.
In one embodiment, actuator assembly 170 includes an armature housing 174, an armature 176, a pair of bushing containing end caps 178 and an actuator support 172. Armature 176 has dual shafts 184 and, in use, applies force to the bridge 150 to cause reciprocating motion of the blades as described more fully below. As it translates back and forth is applies a force on the bridge 150. In one embodiment the armature housing 174 and armature 176 uses a voice coil principle to move the shaft 184 back and forth in a reciprocating motion. In this context, by rapidly changing direction of the magnetic flux in the voice coil, the relative range of motion of the blade assemblies 102 can be precisely controlled. Armature 176 resides within armature housing 174. The armature housing 174 then resides within a void defined by distal end 182 of handle 180. Actuator support 172 is molded to engage distal end 182 and retain armature housing 174 within the void. Actuator support 172 may also be molded to include a leading platform 160 that extends from a front edge of the actuator support 172. Leading platform 160 resides ahead of the leading blade assembly and does not move responsive to force applied by the actuator assembly 170. As used herein, “leading” refers to earlier in position relative to the direction of shaving.
Bridge 150 is molded to have a yoke 158 that spans between two linkages 154 on to which blade assemblies 102 may be installed. The yoke 158 terminates in an eye at either end. The linkages 154 are substantially rigid such that they do not bend along the length of the linkage when driven by the actuator assembly 170. Linkages 154 are molded to define a plurality of bores 152. The number of bores 152 in each linkage 154 is dictated by the number of blade assemblies 102 desired to be part of the shaving head 100. Each blade assembly 102 includes a pair of posts 142 that pass through and remain rotatable within the bores 152 of the linkages 154. The importance of this rotatable engagement is detailed further below. Eyes 156 permit the bridge 150 to rotatably couple to the post 142 of one of the blade assemblies 102. Thus, the bridge 150 couples to the linkages 154 adjacent to at least one of the plurality of bores 152. In the shown embodiment, Eyes 156 couple the bridge to the linkages 154 adjacent to the center bore 152 of the three bores 152. In an alternative embodiment the eyes might couple the bridge adjacent to any one of the other bores 152. Bridge 150 is formed of a substantially rigid mechanical structure and may be molded of a material such as glass fiber impregnated plastic.
Bridge 150 also defines a handle attachment mechanism 162 that permits selective coupling of the razor head to handle 180 and in particular engagement of the yoke by the actuator assembly 170 and more specifically by actuator shaft 184. A release lever 181 is provided to cause the disengagement of the shaving head from the handle 180. While one possible handle arrangement is shown, other shapes and form factors are deemed to be within the scope and contemplation of different embodiments of the invention.
In one embodiment, blade assembly 102 has three primary parts, a razor blade 130, a cover 120 and a base 140. The cover 120 is unitarily molded as a single unit. The blade 130 has a cutting edge 132 and defines a plurality of voids 134. It is within the scope and contemplation of embodiments of the invention to use blades with more or fewer voids 134 than shown. If fewer or more pins are used fewer or more voids can be defined.
The cover 120 has formed as part thereof a plurality of deformable pins 126 that pass through the voids 134 of the blade 130. The cover 120 also has formed as part thereof end caps 124 at either longitudinal end of the cover 120. In one embodiment, the end caps 124 have a generally L shaped cross section. In one embodiment, the short leg of the L provides a hard stop that prevents forward movement of the blade 130 once installed over the pins 126. By holding the blade 130 against the hard stops during manufacture constant cutting edge location is achieved independent of inconsistences that may arise in the manufacture of the blade itself. For example, the relative distance between the cutting edge and the voids may be different between two blades owing to the fact that the edge is typically ground after the voids are punched. Precision molding of the hard stops permits significant tolerance in the blade production including both the edge and the voids without negatively impacting the precision of the finished assembly.
The base 140 is unitarily molded to define a plurality of voids 144 to receive pins 126. Base 140 may also optionally be molded to define one or more sacrificial electrode pockets to receive sacrificial electrodes 190. In one embodiment, the sacrificial electrodes 190 are aluminum spheres and the pockets are defined to be of a size that the sphere will pressure fit within the pocket. In one embodiment, the sphere has a diameter of 1 mm. Other shapes of sacrificial electrodes are also contemplated including but not limited to rectangular solids, toroids, discs and the like. Other embodiments may have the electrode pockets molded into the cover 120, but it is believed that ease of manufacture is enhanced with the electrodes 190 residing in the base 140. Molded as part of base 140 are a pair of deformable posts 142, which during assembly pass through the bores 152 of linkages 154.
To assemble blade assembly 102, the cover 120 is held in a fixture and the blade 130 is inserted such that the pins 126 pass through the voids 134 in the blade 130. The hard stops 124 in conjunction with the pins 126 force the blade into a precise position. The sacrificial electrodes 190 (if present in the embodiment) are pressure fit into pockets in the base 140 and the base 140 is overlaid on the cover-blade combination such that the pins 126 pass through the voids 144 in the base 140. Pressure is applied to pins 126 to drive them into the plastic range of the material used such that the pins 126 are permanently deformed and hold the assembly 102 together as a unit. Notably, unlike prior art razor assemblies that often relied on heat welding or similar processes, here, no heat processing is required for assembly. The final position of the blade is achieved when the sandwich of the cover, blade and base is compressed. The hard stops 124 ensure precision and consistency between blade assemblies. While the foregoing blade assemblies 102 are cost effective and efficient to manufacture, practice of embodiments of the invention are not limited to that particular construction or arrangement. Generally, any individual independent blade assemblies that can be installed on the linkages 154 could be used.
While greater movement of the leading assembly has be found to be effective, it should be recognized that is not required. In some embodiments, for example, only two blade assemblies may be used with the pivot point centrally located between them such that each blade assembly experiences substantially equal movement. Other embodiments may have the pivot point located between the leading blade assembly and the middle blade assembly such that the lagging blade assembly experiences the greatest movement (presuming equal distance between the blade assemblies). In another embodiment the pivot point may be located at the middle blade assembly such that it effectively does not move and the leading and lagging blade assemblies reciprocate back and forth. Such an embodiment requires the bridge to apply its force displaced from the pivot point to cause the pivot.
In
The posts of the blade assemblies must rotate within the bores to permit the linkage to pivot as describe. In this embodiment d′ is equal to the distance the bridge is driven in one direction. If one draws an axis through the center of the middle bore, the displacement of the center of the leading and lagging bores is a′ and a respectively. Notably, while in the shown embodiment the distance between the middle bore and the other bores is the same, that need not be the case in all embodiment. Where the distance between the bore is different between the bore pairs, a and a′ will generally not be the same. Furthermore, while the pivot point 412 in some embodiments is defined to be closer to the lagging attachment point (relative to the middle bore) other embodiments define the pivot point centrally between the middle and lagging bore or even closer to the middle bore.
All of these geometric changes affect the relative range of reciprocating motion experiences by each blade assembly.
In the foregoing specification, the embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5152064 | Johnston | Oct 1992 | A |
D343922 | Ahlgren | Feb 1994 | S |
5307564 | Schoenberg | May 1994 | A |
5504997 | Lee | Apr 1996 | A |
5732470 | Labarbara | Mar 1998 | A |
5794342 | Davey | Aug 1998 | A |
D423143 | Cowell | Apr 2000 | S |
6125857 | Silber | Oct 2000 | A |
6161288 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6418623 | Marcarelli | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430814 | Solow | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434828 | Andrews | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442840 | Zucker | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6502312 | Beutel | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6615492 | Parsonage | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7024776 | Wain | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086160 | Coffin | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7131203 | Wain | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7797834 | Steunenberg | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8024863 | Wain | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8156652 | Takeuchi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8273205 | Murgida | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8479398 | Coresh | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8595940 | Coresh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8671576 | Hotella | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8707561 | Kneier | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8726517 | Lau | May 2014 | B2 |
9144914 | Coresh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9457486 | Coresh | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10112313 | Robertson | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20050188540 | Kelly | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060064875 | Folio | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080034592 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080148574 | Chou | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20120151772 | Moon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130000127 | Coresh | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130160296 | Park et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130199346 | Psimadas | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140102271 | Krenik | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140182138 | Krenik | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140259676 | Chou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259677 | Coresh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150266192 | Coresh | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160001454 | Coresh | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160089800 | Coresh | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160121496 | Johnson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160144519 | Hahn | May 2016 | A1 |
20180304483 | Lev | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180361603 | Griffin | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190337173 | Coresh | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2731538 | Jan 2010 | CA |
2942900 | Sep 2015 | CA |
184913 | Aug 1922 | GB |
290796 | May 1928 | GB |
2462086 | Jan 2010 | GB |
20140053107 | May 2014 | KR |
2010010517 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2013003484 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2015142526 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016053664 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16701069 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17706040 | US |