The present disclosure relates to recirculating vertical wind tunnels, and in particular, tunnels for indoor skydiving. These tunnels recreate the experience of outdoor skydiving in a safe and controlled indoor environment. However, recirculating vertical wind tunnels are often quite expensive to build and operate, and require a substantial amount of space to generate an airflow that is strong enough to suspend one or more persons, within acceptable levels of noise and energy consumption, while also maintaining a consistent quality airflow. It is often desirable that the airflow through the flight chamber is substantially uniform with low turbulence. Moving in the direction of airflow, recirculating vertical wind tunnels generally comprise a flight chamber, a diffuser above the flight chamber, a first corner or turn, an upper horizontal plenum, a second corner or turn, a vertical return plenum, a third corner or turn, a lower horizontal plenum, a fourth corner or turn, and an inlet contractor—also referred to as a contracting duct or jet nozzle—below the flight chamber. Tunnels have been designed with a single flowpath loop or a plurality of flowpath loops, in which case the different airflow pathways typically diverge downstream from the flight chamber (e.g., at or near the first corner) and then converge again upstream from the flight chamber (e.g., at or near the fourth corner).
Some recirculating vertical tunnel facilities install the bottom portions of the tunnel structure (e.g., the bottom corners, lower horizontal plenum, inlet contractor, lower part of the vertical return plenum) underground such that the flight chamber is at or near ground level. In this way, the structural integrity of the tunnel may be augmented while also avoiding the necessity of arranging the flight chamber on an upper floor of the facility, which can decrease commercial visibility/accessibility and increase associated building costs. This design approach may also allow a facility to comply with local building height restrictions. Further, positioning at least a portion of the flowpath circuit underground can help to absorb heat and noise from the tunnel. Due to the dimensional requirements of many recirculating vertical wind tunnel designs, however, substantial underground excavation is generally required to lay the necessary foundation if the flight chamber will be at or near ground level. For example, the height between the base of the flight chamber and the base of the lower horizontal plenum may be approximately 25 feet (7.6 m) or more in some designs. Construction costs and project timeframes will typically increase linearly with the length and width of the excavation, but exponentially with the depth of the excavation. Cost and time requirements may be further amplified depending on the local soil composition and moisture content. Technical challenges also arise with increasing excavation depth as well, including accounting for the heightened risks of water infiltration and collapse from the higher lateral pressure exerted by surrounding terrain at deeper locations. Further, it may be difficult or cost prohibitive to achieve a desired depth due to shallow bedrock in some locations. In laying the structure foundation, conventional approaches have typically used poured cement to form the bottom portions of the wind tunnel, which generally results in simple geometries defining the flowpath cross section compared to preformed fabrications having custom-designed geometries produced from different materials, in order to reduce construction costs. What is needed is a recirculating vertical wind tunnel with a reduced height between the flight chamber and the base of the flowpath structure, with minimal impact to tunnel efficiency or the quality of airflow for indoor skydiving.
Moreover, wind tunnels generally have a cable floor assembly or structure to provide support to users standing within the flight chamber, while also allowing the airflow to pass through to suspend users during indoor skydiving. In many tunnels, the cables are mounted to a plurality of weldments arranged around the periphery of the flight chamber. The weldments are typically supported by separate load-bearing crossbeams or other elements of the facility structure, which can increase construction costs. The cables often have varying sizes to minimize the required horizontal footprint of the weldments around the flight chamber, since many flight chambers are circular or substantially circular in cross section, meaning a cable through an edge of the flight chamber does not need to be as long as a cable through the center diameter of the flight chamber. The weldments generally have a removeable top cover to access the ends of the cables securely mounted within the weldments. Therefore, such designs are typically installed, replaced, and maintained from above by workers on the commercial level of the facility (e.g., the observation area or staging chamber surrounding the flight chamber). Because the cables extend across the flight chamber and mount within the weldments, the inside of the weldments are often in aerodynamic communication with the tunnel flowpath. To prevent noise infiltration to the commercial areas surrounding the flight chamber through the weldments, the top covers are usually sealed to prevent customers from being exposed to the high decibel levels inside the wind tunnel. Such designs have relatively expensive component fabrication costs; subjectively less aesthetic appeal due to visible access covers surrounding the flight chamber; a relatively lengthy, complicated, and arduous installation/maintenance process, which increases labor costs and project timeframes; and a limited range of possible suppliers due to complexity from the requirements.
Another consideration in wind tunnel design and construction is the horizontal dimensional requirements of the flowpath. For example, some locations may not have the necessary space or footprint available to accommodate the horizontal length dimensional requirements of a particular wind tunnel design. In this sense, a smaller location may not be feasible for wind tunnel construction. What is needed is a recirculating vertical wind tunnel with a reduced dimensional requirement along the length of the flowpath structure.
The foregoing discussion of the related art and any limitations therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon review of the specification and drawings.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
The present disclosure relates to a recirculating vertical wind tunnel design. One aspect is to reduce the vertical distance or height between the base of the flight chamber and the base of the fourth corner and/or lower horizontal plenum. Another aspect is to merge the inlet contractor and the fourth corner under the flight chamber into a single structure and airflow path element. Another aspect is to decrease the construction costs and time requirements associated with depth excavation when the flight chamber is to be arranged at or near ground level. Another aspect is efficient power consumption to reduce the operational costs of the tunnel. Another aspect is to minimize turbulence, friction, and pressure loss within such a wind tunnel. Another aspect is to provide an airflow inside the flight chamber that is at least comparable in quality to prior tunnel designs with respect to uniformity and turbulence.
These aspects may be satisfied by a vertical wind tunnel for indoor skydiving, comprising:
By providing a corner section, which connects at least one bottom horizontal member to a first vertical member with its flight chamber, with a design such that the airstream travelling through it is contracted, the overall height of such a vertical wind tunnel can be significantly reduced. Then the necessary inlet contractor upstream to the flight chamber is provided by the corner section. Therefore, the bottom of the flight chamber can be arranged much lower than in prior art tunnels of this kind. The bottom of the flight chamber may thus be arranged at the very bottom of the first vertical member. In order to provide a smooth airstream contraction, this vertical wind tunnel provides a dual stage contraction, which two contraction steps do not necessarily need to be separated from each other but can be continuous. One contraction zone is arranged in the corner section at the bottom of the first vertical member, and an upstream contraction section is arranged within the bottom horizontal member.
We believe this is the first time that it is suggested to use the corner section at the bottom of the first vertical member with its flight chamber as the inlet contractor.
The benefits of the present disclosure can be achieved with tunnels having one single return airflow plenum or having more than one return airflow plenum, for example two airflow plenums, for example arranged in relation to the first vertical member at opposite sides thereof. Further, the benefits of the present disclosure can be achieved irrespective of where in the return airflow plenum the means for providing the airstream, the fan assembly, is arranged. The fan assembly could be arranged in the top horizontal member. It is also possible to arrange the fan assembly in the second vertical member, in particular in its upper section.
In order to reduce turbulences within the contracting corner section, it is possible to arrange a set of turning vanes in the corner section which redirect the airstream entering the corner section streaming horizontally into a direction towards the flight chamber within the first vertical member. Depending on the length of guidance that the turning vanes provide to the airstream, it is possible that shorter turning vanes in the direction of the travel of the airstream are arranged within the corner section. Two or more sets of turning vanes may also be used depending on the tunnel configuration. The turning vanes may be arranged within an arch-like section of the corner section, which arch section typically provides part of the plenum walls. This arch section is preferably curved in the direction of curvature that the airstream is redirected in the corner section.
In some embodiments, another measure to reduce turbulences while redirecting and contracting the airstream in the corner section is to provide a ridge in the bottom section. This ridge functions like a turning vane redirecting the flow of at least a lower part of the airstream entering into the corner section. In case the tunnel has two return airflow plenums arranged opposite to each other with respect to the first vertical member, then two ridges may be arranged typically abutting each other with their backsides and arranged in alignment with a vertical center line through the flight chamber in the first vertical member. This means that the two ridges are arranged in the projection of the middle of the flight chamber with their center. The two ridge may be separate components, provided by a single component, or integrally formed in the plenum wall at this location, for example.
Numerous further aspects of the wind tunnel are disclosed in the following. All features described and disclosed in the specific embodiments can also be used independently from each other. This shall mean that the individual features and benefits of each feature, even if described together with other features, can also be achieved without necessarily needing the other features disclosed in combination with that feature.
Another aspect is to provide a cable floor assembly or structure with reduced fabrication costs for the constituent assembly components. Another aspect is to provide a cable floor assembly which reduces the construction costs of the larger wind tunnel facility building. Another aspect is to simplify and decrease the time required for installation of the cable floor assembly. Another aspect is to simplify and decrease the time required for maintenance of the cable floor assembly. Another aspect is to decrease the time to market for a new wind tunnel construction having such a cable floor assembly. Another aspect is to increase the potential supplier pool for the cable floor assembly. Another aspect is to provide a cable floor assembly which enables a streamlined or minimalist aesthetic with respect to the floor surrounding the flight chamber. Another aspect is to provide a cable floor assembly configured for maintenance service from below.
Another aspect is to provide a stepped plenum divergence in a corner of the wind tunnel to reduce the dimensional requirements between corners of the wind tunnel. Another aspect is a stepped plenum divergence in a corner of the wind tunnel to provide adequate spatial clearance for accommodating ducts and/or ducted fans arranged immediately downstream from the corner. Another aspect is a stepped plenum divergence in a corner of the wind tunnel to provide adequate spatial clearance for accommodating other structural elements, such as support columns or beams.
Another aspect is to provide a recirculating vertical wind tunnel wherein the airflow plenum is separated throughout the vertical return member.
Another aspect is to provide a recirculating vertical wind tunnel having a flyer exchange system for controlling participant movement and environment exchange between the flight chamber and the surrounding observation area of the facility.
In addition to aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the accompanying drawings and the detailed description forming a part of this specification.
This disclosure is described hereinafter with reference to the following figures:
In the sectional views of
Before further explaining the depicted embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the particular arrangements shown, since the invention is capable of other embodiments. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purposes of description and not limitation.
The third corner 207 may have a relatively wide rectangular construction to reduce excavation depth. For example, if the cross section of the third corner 207 at the juncture with the lower horizontal plenum 208 was squarer, then the required height of the third corner 207 along the vertical dimension would need to be increased to maintain the same cross-sectional area through the third corner for purposes of reducing airflow friction. By horizontally widening out the third corner 207, the lateral footprint requirements for the foundation increase while the depth requirements are reduced, which results in net savings with respect to excavation costs if the flight chamber is placed at or near ground level. The vertical return plenum 206 may share the widened geometry of the third corner 207 at the juncture of the vertical return plenum 206 and the third corner 207. Likewise, the lower horizontal plenum 208 may also share the widened geometry of the third corner 207 at the juncture of the lower horizontal plenum 208 and the third corner 207.
The lower horizontal plenum 208 may comprise a first section 211 and a second section 212. In the direction of airflow, the vertical return plenum 206 transitions through the third corner 207 into the first section 211 of the lower horizontal plenum 208. The first section 211 then transitions into the second section 212 of the lower horizontal plenum 208. The second section 212 is connected to the fourth or contracting corner 209 below the flight chamber 201. Where the vertical return plenum 206 and/or the third corner 207 have rectangular cross sections, the first section 211 of the lower horizontal plenum 208 may have a generally rectangular cross section as well. Of course, these plenums 206, 207, 208 may have different geometries other than rectangular, including other polygonal geometries or curved geometries (e.g., circular, elliptical, or substantially so), including different combinations thereof. Flat walls forming rectangular geometries are generally used at these locations of the flowpath to reduce construction costs and complexity—which typically increase when using curved or many-sided geometries—even though the hard corners may introduce additional turbulence into the airflow.
The first section 211 of the lower horizontal plenum 208 may comprise corner transition portions 213 for the transition into the second section 212 of the lower horizontal plenum 208. For example, in the depicted embodiment, the cross section of the flowpath at the juncture between the first section 211 and the second section 212 is generally rectangular with rounded top corners. The upper corners of the first section 211 progressively transition between hard corners near the third corner 208 into such rounded corners at the second section 212 via the corner transition portions 213. In some embodiments, the corner transition portions 213 may extend along at least a majority of the longitudinal length of the first section 211. In other embodiments, the corner transition portions 213 may extend along at least two-thirds of the longitudinal length of the first section 211. Further yet, the corner portions 213 could extend along at least three-fourths of the length of the first section 211, including along the entire or substantially the entire longitudinal length of the first section 211. The corner transition portions 213 help to reduce turbulence downstream in the upper corners of the second section 212.
The second section 212 of the lower horizontal plenum 208 contracts from a generally rectangular cross section with rounded corners at the juncture with the first section 211, to a generally semi-oval or semi-elliptical cross section at the juncture with the fourth corner 209 when viewed along the longitudinal axis (see
The contracting corner 209 turns the airflow in the lower horizontal plenum 208 upward directly into the flight chamber 201. At the same time, the contracting corner 209 also reduces the total cross-sectional area of the flowpath between the lower horizontal plenums 208 and the base of the flight chamber 201, which increases the velocity of the airflow for suspension of users within the flight chamber 201. In embodiments with two or more return loops, the contracting corner 209 also merges the separate airflows before the same enters the flight chamber 201. By integrating the fourth corner and inlet contractor together in a single structure, the need for a separate inlet contractor structure beneath the flight chamber is eliminated. In this way, the vertical distance between the base of the flight chamber 201 and the base of the contracting corner 209 and/or lower horizontal plenum 208 can be significantly reduced.
For example, the height of the tunnel flowpath between the base of the fourth or contracting corner 209 and the base of the flight chamber 201 can be reduced by approximately 35% relative to comparable wind tunnel designs, without significant sacrifice to efficiency. This may correspond to a height of approximately 10 feet or more. The height savings also corresponds to shortening of the overall tunnel flowpath. With the disclosed design, both reduced-excavation constructions and even entirely above-grade constructions are viable. Benefits include construction cost savings, construction time savings and construction risk reduction. Further, decreased height requirements make it viable to build in locations with height restrictions.
Specifically, in certain embodiments, for a dual-loop recirculating wind tunnel, a height between the base of the flight chamber 201 and the base of the contracting corner 209 (or lower horizontal plenum 208) can be realized which is less than or equal to 1.3 times the diameter of the flight chamber 201. In other words: [the vertical distance between the base of the flight chamber and the base of the contracting corner] is ≤[1.3×the diameter of the flight chamber]. For a single-loop recirculating wind tunnel, in certain embodiments, a height between the base of the flight chamber 201 and the base of the contracting corner 209 (or lower horizontal plenum 208) can be realized which is less than or equal to the diameter of the flight chamber 201 multiplied by a factor of 1.9. In other words: [the vertical distance between the base of the flight chamber and the base of the contracting corner] is ≤[1.9×the diameter of the flight chamber].
Regarding costs and therefore potential savings, it should be appreciated that the cost to build a wind tunnel is dependent on location. Factors include the cost of tunnel materials, the cost of labor, the cost of transporting materials to location, the cost of earthworks for a particular location, etc. Factors can also vary with quality and availability. Timing, both in terms of project timeframes and market forces, can further affect cost. In other words, each project has its own challenges and circumstances that make direct comparisons across completed tunnel locations difficult. Based on available data and project estimates, a wind tunnel according to the present disclosure can save about $20,000 to $100,000 USD per foot excavation, with an estimated average of about $40,000 USD. This correlates to as much as $400,000 USD or more per construction. Some projects could realize savings upwards of $1,000,000 USD or more. These savings can compensate for increased costs in other respects, if any, such as custom fabrication, transportation, or using relatively more expensive materials. Putting aside excavation depth considerations, it would seem counterintuitive that the complex geometries and curvature of a contracting corner according to the present disclosure could result in cost savings over more basic geometries (e.g., rectangular corners made of poured concrete). But once molds are created for curved wall plenums (e.g. lower horizontal plenum section 212), which are reusable for future projects of the same model, it can actually save on costs compared to pouring concrete. For example, using pre-formed fiberglass plenums with complex curvature can produce savings up to $100,000 USD with respect to part and installation costs, compared to poured concrete for simple plenum geometries (e.g. flat walls), which offsets potential increases in shipping and material costs. With the height reduction, concrete (Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) 2012 Division Code 03) and earthwork (CSI 2012 Division Code 31) costs can be significantly decreased in the magnitude of several hundred thousand dollars. Earthworks in particular can realize significant savings depending on the tunnel location, since location moisture, soil type, bedrock depth, etc. alone can significantly increase excavation and required shoring costs, in some cases to over $1,000,000 USD total for especially challenging build sites. Further, average project timeframes are estimated to be reduced initially by one to two months according to the present disclosure. Such time savings cannot be understated in relation to keeping project costs down and accelerating returns from opening the wind tunnel facility. Again, it must be appreciated that every construction project is unique and depends on the interplay of a plurality of factors; meaning potential savings discussed herein may not be realized in each instance. However, the limited data and current estimates reveals that significant savings are anticipated in constructing a wind tunnel having a contracting corner design according to the present disclosure, and generally regardless of the specific project location.
The contracting corner 209 comprises smooth or substantially-smooth curvature throughout the plenum wall transitions. This construction also reduces turbulence through the corner 209. In a dual-return or double-looped wind tunnel design (see
Further, the centerline 215 constitutes a ridge in the depicted embodiment. Here, the ridge 215 is formed by the bottom surfaces of each of the lower horizontal plenums 208 turning upward to meet at the centerline 215. In other embodiments, the ridge 215 may be formed by one or more components installed at this position (e.g. if the bottom surfaces of the lower horizontal plenums 208 are flat or substantially flat and do not themselves turn upward to form a ridge). The ridge 215 helps to redirect the airflow along the bottom surface of each lower horizontal plenum 208 upward into the contracting corner 209 and reduce turbulence from merging the airflows, at least compared to embodiments not having an upward-projecting ridge structure wherein the airflows along the bottom surfaces would meet head on. However, it should be appreciated that the ridge is not strictly required to realize benefits of the present disclosure and indeed may be absent in other embodiments. In that case, the centerline 215 (the nadir or base midpoint of the V-shape described above) may be provided as a flat or substantially flat surface. For example, the bottom surfaces of the plenums 208 may join in a flat or substantially flat manner at the centerline location or the centerline 215 may be located along the surface of a single plenum component at this location, depending on the particular construction. In single-return embodiments, the centerline 215 may be provided where the bottom surface of the lower horizontal plenum 208 joins with a vertical or substantially vertical end wall of the contracting corner 209, for example at a hard edge or through a curved surface transition. Therefore, like the arches 214, the centerline 215 is descriptive of points in space.
Nonetheless, using these conventions, the contracting corner 209 smoothly transitions from the circular base of the flight chamber 201 to points along one of the arches 214. Along the longitudinal axis of the lower horizontal plenums 208, the smooth transition of the plenum walls of the contracting corner 209 comprises a single or substantially single curvature in moving between the base of the flight chamber 201 and the apex of each respective arch 214 (see
The bottom surface or floor 216 of the lower horizontal plenum 208, or the lower horizontal plenum 208 and the third corner 207 and/or fourth corner 209, may be configured for draining any liquids that might accumulate in the wind tunnel 200. As shown in
Turning now to
As seen in
As seen in
It should be appreciated that the cable floor assembly 222 can be accessed for maintenance from under, rather than above, the weldments 224. In this way, the cover plates 227 need not be accessible or even necessarily sealed from the commercial areas surrounding the flight chamber 201. Instead, finished flooring (e.g., carpet, wood, tile, composite, etc.) may be installed over the cover plates 227 to provide a streamlined or minimalist aesthetic of the floor surrounding the flight chamber 201 to customers. For maintenance purposes, such as checking or replacing components of the cable floor assembly, the frame 220 may comprise walkways to facilitate access to the cables 223 and mounting plate 225 from beneath the weldment 224 (see
In certain embodiments of a dual-return recirculating wind tunnel, the height between the cables 223 and the bottom surface of the tunnel plenum thereunder (or base of the corner) is less than or equal to 1.3 times the diameter of the flight chamber. Stated another way: [the vertical distance between the cables and the base of the corner] is ≤[1.3×the diameter of the flight chamber]. In certain embodiments of single-loop recirculating wind tunnel, the height between the cables 223 and the bottom surface of the tunnel plenum thereunder (or base of the corner) is less than or equal to 1.9 times the diameter of the flight chamber. Stated another way: [the vertical distance between the cables and the base of the corner] is ≤[1.9×the diameter of the flight chamber].
Turning to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Operation of the doors 510, 512 may be automatic, manual, or both. For example, opening and/or closing may be operated by pushbutton or another input device from the operator control room 504. Likewise, pushbutton(s) or other input device(s) may be provided at the doors 510, 512 themselves for operation by participants, such as inside the flyer exchanger 500 and/or the corridor 506. Automated timed operation may also be used to control when the doors 510, 512 are opened and/or closed, as well as the sequence in which specific doors are opened and/or closed. Sensors may also be used for automated door operation. Still further, a RFID or bar/QR code reader may be provided proximate to the exterior door 510 to scan a wristband or keycard worn by the participant to confirm entry authorization before the exterior door 510 is opened.
Accordingly, it should be appreciated that the flyer exchange device 500 provides a controlled and continuous mechanism for the exchange of flyers between the flight chamber 502 and observation area 508. Pressure and noise exchange between the flight chamber 502 and observation area 508 is prevented or reduced via the two-door system. User access can be controlled and tracked via the authentication scanning methods. Further, views of the flight chamber 502 from the surrounding observation area 508 are less impeded compared to prior wind tunnel facilities having an entire staging area chamber for housing batches of participants extending around the flight chamber periphery. This aspect also frees up additional floor space for the observation area 508 adjacent to the flight chamber 502 for other uses.
While a number of aspects and embodiments have been discussed, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations therefor. It is thus intended that the following appended claims are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations, which are within their true spirit and scope. Each embodiment described herein has numerous equivalents.
The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof; it being recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by certain embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts disclosed herein may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims. Whenever a range is given in the specification, all intermediate ranges and subranges, as well as all individual values included in the ranges given are intended to be included in the disclosure. When a Markush group or other grouping is used herein, all individual members of the group and all possible combinations and sub-combinations of the group are intended to be individually included in the disclosure.
In general, the terms and phrases used herein have their art-recognized meaning, which can be found by reference to standard texts, literature, journal references and contexts known to those skilled in the art. The above definitions are provided to clarify their specific use in the context of the invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/290,402 which is a National stage of PCT/IB2019/059,857 filed Nov. 16, 2019, which claims the benefits of provisional application No. 62/929,260 filed Nov. 1, 2019 and of provisional application No. 62/768,384 filed Nov. 16, 2018, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1811364 | Olshevsky | Jun 1931 | A |
3109670 | Engel | Nov 1963 | A |
3484953 | Norheim, Jr. | Dec 1969 | A |
4457509 | St-Germain | Jul 1984 | A |
5099685 | McLean et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5495754 | Starr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5655909 | Kitchen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6083110 | Kitchen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
7153136 | Hatlestad et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156744 | Metni et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7640796 | Petruk | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7819664 | Petruk | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7926339 | Serrano Pellicer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8668497 | Nebe et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9045232 | Burke et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9194632 | Metni et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9327202 | Lurie | May 2016 | B2 |
D770383 | Lurie et al. | Nov 2016 | S |
10238980 | Romanenko et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10765958 | Maida et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11058960 | Metni et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20110100109 | Kim et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20150375125 | Lurie | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180050276 | Romanenko et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190001229 | Arias, IV | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190184297 | Romanenko et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190329142 | Maida | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200324213 | Metni et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
PI9702554-2 | Mar 1999 | BR |
201492925 | Jun 2010 | CN |
202393581 | Aug 2012 | CN |
202420815 | Sep 2012 | CN |
302446241 | May 2013 | CN |
302446242 | May 2013 | CN |
302446243 | May 2013 | CN |
302446244 | May 2013 | CN |
105854304 | Aug 2016 | CN |
112717428 | Apr 2021 | CN |
3007950 | Sep 1981 | DE |
2659620 | Sep 1991 | FR |
2062557 | May 1981 | GB |
201281652 | Jul 2009 | IN |
02-036887 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-036887 | Jun 1990 | JP |
H03-1361289 | Jun 1991 | JP |
H03-116883 | Dec 1991 | JP |
6-296764 | Oct 1994 | JP |
8-182787 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H08-182791 | Jul 1996 | JP |
8-299515 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8-299516 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H08-299516 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10-082715 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-156047 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-234919 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-311774 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-314359 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-42308 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2008-076304 | Apr 2008 | JP |
14423 | Jan 2012 | LV |
568424 | Mar 2010 | NZ |
0059595 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2010028980 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011044860 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011084114 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2015185124 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016170365 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016180735 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017006251 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017098411 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2017103768 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2018015766 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018122575 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2019021056 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019082115 | May 2019 | WO |
2020067917 | Apr 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Koss, Holger; Climatic Wind Tunnel, Civil Engineering & Architectural Aerodynamics (CEAero); May 2014. |
Lindgren, Bjorn et al.; Evaluation of a New Wind-Tunnel with Expanding Corners; Royal Institute of Technology Department of Mechanics SE-1 00 44 Stockholm, Sweden; Oct. 2003. |
Wenzinger, Carl J. and Harris, Thomas A.: “The Vertical Wind Tunnel of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics”, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Report No. 387, Feb. 1931. |
Defrance, Smith J : “The N.A.C.A. Full-Scale Wind Tunnel”, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Mar. 1933. |
Rossow, Vernon J.; Schmidt, Gene I.; Meyn, Larry A.; Ortner, Kimberley R.; and Holmes, Robert E.: “Aerodynamic Characterics of an Air-Exchanger System for the 40-by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel al Ames Research Center”, NASA TM 88192, Jan. 1986, pp. 4, 29 and 33. |
Pope, Alan and Harper, John J : “Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966, pp. 6-7 and 75-76. |
Wolf, T.: “Improvement and Modernization of Subsonic Wind Tunnels”, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 30, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1993. |
DD Form 139lc Army, FY 1985 Military Construction Project Data, dated Dec. 12, 1984, Ft. Bragg, NC, Titled: Unspecified Minor Construction Free Fall Simulation Facility, Project No. T897. |
Neihouse, A.I., “Design and Operation Techniques of Vertical Spin Tunnels”, AGARD Memorandum, Nov. 6, 1954. |
Hiscocks et al., “Report on Bivis to Luftfahrtforschungsanstant Hermann Goring, Volkenrode Brunswick”, B.I.O.S. Final Report No. 160, 1945. |
“8-Food Transonic Wind Tunnel”, CALSPAN Report No. WTO-300, Oct. 1971. |
Photos from NASA website of Langley Wind Tunnel (http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:15ft._ and_20ft._ Spin_Tun.pg). |
Wind Tunnels of NASA, Chapter 4 (http://history.nasa.gov/SP-440/ch4-7.htm). Website accessed Apr. 8, 2015. |
“Vertical Wind Tunnel”, LIFE Magazine, Aug. 8, 1949, p. 55-57. |
“Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Area B, Building 27, Verical Wind Tunnel”, HAER No. OH-79-A, Historical American Engineering Record. |
Garner et al., “Subsonic Wind Tunnel Wall Corrections”, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, AGARDograph 109, Oct. 1966. |
Spiegel et al. “A Description of the Ames 2-by-2 foot Transonic Wind Tunnel and Preliminary Evaluation of Wall Interference”, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, NACA Research Memorandum, Jan. 20, 1956. |
Website for Vegas Indoor Skydiving, http://www.vegasindoorskydiving.com. |
Neihouse et al., “Status of Spin Research for Recent Airplane Designs” Langley Research Center Technical Report R-57. |
Goodrich et al., “Wind Tunnels of the Eastern Hemisphere”, Library of Congress, Aug. 2008. |
Troller, “The Daniel Guggenheim Airship Institute”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vo9. 9, No. 1, Jan. 1938. |
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Vertical Wind Tunnel diagrams, 1944. |
Baggett, “You float on air in this new-sport flight chamber”, Popular SCience, Mar. 1983. |
Zell, “Performance and Test Section Flow Characteristics of the National Full-Scale Aerodynamic Complex 80-by-120-Foot Wind Tunnel”, NASA Technical Memorandum 103920, Jan. 1993. |
World Directory of Aerospace Research and Development, US General Accounting Office, Jan. 22, 1990. |
“Technical Guide for the Kirsten Wind Tunnel”, University of Washington Aeronautical Laboratory, Apr. 2002. |
“NASA Langley's 30-by-60-Fott Tunnel”, NASA Facts, Oct. 1995. |
Design drawings—NACA Wind Tunnel, 1928. |
Mehta et al., “Technical Notes: Design rules for small low speed wind tunnels”, The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Nov. 1979. |
Martinez, “The Texas A&M University Low Speed Wind Tunnel”, The Wind Tunnel Connection, vol. 1, Issue 3, Mar. 2001. |
Schmidt et al., “One-fiftieth Scale Model Studies of 40-by-80-Foot and 80-by-120-Foot Wind Tunnel Complex at NASA Ames Research Center”, NASA Technical Memorandum 89405, Apr. 1987. |
NASA, “The Wandering Wind Tunnel”, https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/WindTunnel/wandering_windtunnel.html. |
“Wind Tunnel Explained with Computational Fluid Dynamics”, Symscape, (https://www.symscape.com/blog/wind-tunnel-explained-with-computational-fluid dynamics), Jun. 28, 2013. |
Pankhurst et al., “Wind-Tunnel Technique”, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., 1952. |
Bradshaw et al., “Wind Tunnel Design: Corner Vanes” (http://navier.stanford.edu/bradshaw/tunnel/cornervane.html). Website accessed Jul. 22, 2013. |
Gorlin et al., “Wind Tunnels and their Instrumentation” (translate3d from Russian), Israel Program for Scientific Translations. |
Boethert, “Transonic Wind Tunnel Testing”, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development,, AGARDograph 49, 1961 (in three parts). |
Examination Report dated Aug. 17, 2023 in related Australian application 2022291630. |
Examination Report dated Oct. 5, 2023 in related Canadian application 3114629. |
Examination report dated Feb. 1, 2023 in related Taiwan application No. 108141836. Foreign references cited in report are already on record. |
Examination report dated Mar. 4, 2024 in related Taiwan application No. 112130960. Foreign references cited in report are already on record. |
Examination report dated May 1, 2024 in related Australian application No. 2022291630. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230052575 A1 | Feb 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62929260 | Nov 2019 | US | |
62768384 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17290402 | US | |
Child | 17968305 | US |