In the patents mentioned above, the seating was supported by flexible members so as to enable it to rotate with respect to the chair frame, thereby enabling the user to vary his position from upright sitting to fully reclining sitting. A reclinable chair being more comfortable and healthier for its occupant.
Runners attached to the four corners of the seating board went through slots machined in the chair's frame whereby they attached to the ends of said flexible members. Each of the four slots where shaped like a circular sector, with the diameter of said sectors matching the distance between the front and the rear runners. Hence, the rotation of the seating was guided by the geometry of said slots. Expressly, the sliding of the runners over the edges of the slots controlled the motions of the seating.
Though the chairs having a suspended seating worked smoothly and effortlessly, the cumbersome mechanism and the aesthetic design constrains in the frame, needed to house said mechanism, were a big drawback. Another drawback was the impossibility to build an armless chair, since armrests were needed to house the mechanism, and used by the chair occupant to pull the seat forward from the reclined positions.
In the present invention—basically—the seat has plastic shoes or runners that slide over circular slots called here the raceways, that are attached to the frame. The sliding travel of the runners over the raceways defines the seat pivoting degree of rotation. Due to the nature of the sliding surfaces, all the motions are then smoothly and noiselessly attained.
But the most desirable characteristic of a non-powered reclinable seat should be its ability to rotate effortlessly over its whole arc of pivoting and to retain—also effortlessly—any attained seat position.
In the present invention this is achieved by the combination of two features:
In view of the innovative advantages mentioned above, it is the principal object of the present invention to offer a chair mechanism whereby the seat slides over curved surfaces.
It is a further object to provide an armless chair having a reclinable seat.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide greater aesthetics freedom of design, reliability and easy of manufacturing.
The above and other beneficial objects and advantages over the state of the art, are attained in accordance with the present invention which comprises a chair frame and a seat disposed within.
The seat is supported and guided by circular slots attached to the frame; corresponding runners attached to the seat enable it to slide over the convex, or the concave, surfaces of the raceways. In following the raceways path, the runners rotate the seat from a fully upright to a fully reclinable position, and to all positions in within.
In another embodiment the runners are attached to the frame and the raceways are attached to the seat.
In the accompanying drawings:
Referring now in detail to
It will be understood that the hardware is symmetrically disposed on both side of the chair; hence, the hardware on one side only will be described in the future.
The seat comprises an upholstered horizontal board 23 and an upholstered back board 26, which are rigidly connected together to each other at an obtuse angle by the rails 25. This chair, having a reclinable seat, is built differently from the generic fixed chairs where the seat structure and the frame are rigidly connected at a plurality of places. Here the seat rotates, or pivots, within the chair frame, whereby the seat and frame are connect only through the components of the invented reclinable mechanism.
Notice on the horizontal member 22, a throughout machined circular ring sector 27 a slot called the raceway, that houses a corresponding male circular ring sector 28, called the runner. While the raceway 27 is part of the chair frame, the runner 28 is part of the seat. The inner sector 28 having a shorter arc could travels—oscillate—between the inner ends of the raceway. This free travel—an arc of about 14°—clearly defines the extent of the seat rotation, tilting or pivoting.
The virtual (imaginary) transverse axis of the seat rotation would be a line passing through the cross-air A on both sides of the chair. The distance “d”, measured horizontally between a plumb line passing through the center of rotation A and the rear edge of the bottom board 23 is usually 4″ to 8″ (four to eight inches), depending on the chair style and application. Since said center of gravity would vary widely, the value of “d” was settled after numerous diversified tests. In the present invention, the center of rotation is always (measured horizontally), behind the center of gravity of the seat-occupant entirety, to minimize the chair occupant effort necessary to tilt the seat forward. To avoid that the seat tilts backwards due to the weight of the back board, a weak torsion spring 59, connecting the side frame and the seat, will keep the seat in the upright position.
Notice here that the runner 28 has rotated all the way back, inside the raceway 27, until its rear end was stopped by the rear inner end of the raceway. 59 is the torsion spring.
For clarity purposes only, the fabric and foam that comprises the upholstery horizontal board 23 has been removed, leaving in place an ubiquitous panel 24 that is the structural member of said board 23. 28 are the runners (right and left hand required), rigidly attached to panel 24. The runners could be made of a molded reinforced plastic, stamped out of a metallic sheet, machined from a cast or solid piece, etc. Or made by a combination of all of them. The matching cross section surfaces of the raceways and the runners are shown flat, but they could have other shapes. The raceway 27 that is shown here as a cutout on the wooden member 22 should have an inside plastic insert or metallic lining covering the wooden raceway surfaces. The insert or lining could be used to reinforce the wooden cutout, to reduce the sliding noise, to reduce wear and tear and/or to place small surface details on the raceways paths that would be impossible to duplicate in wood, etc. In other instances, a lining that could be a plastic tape or a metallic strip, embedded, glued or fastened over the raceway paths could be used to change its operation, because the dynamic sliding of a runner over a raceway path is very much given by the coefficient of friction between their mating surfaces.
Here, numeral 59 are a pair of elastic elements, torsion springs in this case that, anchored to the planar board 24 and to the side frame in hole 60, would force the seat against its upright position stops.
The different placement of the center of rotation produce different motions on the seat. Other modes of seat rotation could be also created, if the raceway arc is not placed symmetrically to a plumb line passing through the center of rotation.
For clarity purposes only, the fabric and foam that comprises the horizontal board 23 has been removed, leaving in place an ubiquitous panel 24 that is the structural member of said board 23.
30 are the runners, rigidly attached to panel 24. Numeral 31 are the raceways.
Here, the raceway with a large arc, like e.g.: raceway 27 of
The runners 33 and 34 are the free ends of small diameter shafts (about 0.375″ O.D.), but still rotating the same degree of arc than in previous chairs.
This plurality of smaller raceways and runners is ideal for inexpensive, small tube frames and/or expendable chairs, where space for the reclining mechanism components is always tight, and a shorter useful life is acceptable. Also, though the larger surfaces in contact of the runners and raceways of
Instead, in the new embodiment, the runners, each having only a small surface of contact with their raceways, are more tolerant to some misalignment within the components.
Moreover, the raceways don't have to be perfectly circular any longer, since a system of two runners per side will always follow any curved path. For example, the raceways could now be: slightly elliptical or parabolic in its totality or at certain spots; it could even have straight sections, or the original circular path could become distorted by usage without loosing its functionality.
Though the illustration shows the raceways placed above their common center of rotation, all of above claims would also be valid if we had placed the raceways inverted, e.g. below their center of rotation, like shown in
Here, β is the angle between the center of the runner 33 and a vertical line passing through C, while α is the angle between the center of the runner 34 and the vertical line passing through C. In this illustration de value of α is 48°, and the value of a is 60°. Since the raceways 32 and 35 are placed symmetrically to a vertical line passing through the cross-hair C, the 12° difference between the α and β angles is the pivoting arc of the seat. Larger α and β angles increases the friction between the runners and their raceways. Though I have shown the raceways placed symmetrically to a plumb line passing through their center of rotation C, different seat requirement and the chair aesthetics may benefit from non symmetrical angular and radial placement of the raceways.
Obviously, different placement of the raceways will alter the friction factor, hence, the force required to rotate the seat between the upright and the reclined positions, and the ability of the seat to remain ‘locked’ in a chosen place.
In this embodiment the runners 33 and 34 are riding over the outer (lower) concave path of the raceways. The center of rotation of these raceways is indicated by the cross hair L, located above them.
Moreover, the front raceway 59 and the rear raceway 60 are placed asymmetrically with respect to a plumb line passing through L, besides being placed on two different concentric diameter circles.
Here 42 is a foam block, part of the upholstered horizontal board 23. 26 is the back upholstered board, firmly attached to the structural panel 24 by the two rails 25.
33 and 34 are two round shafts firmly attached to the panel 24 by straps 48. The ends of these shafts function as runners that will slide inside the raceways 32, 35, 36 and 37.
A raceway lip 57, a flange on the wheel 39, plus a shoulder step on the shaft diameter checks any lateral seat motions. 48 is a clamp that attach shaft 33 to the seat panel 24. 42 is the horizontal board foam.
The chair of
In any non motorized reclining chair, the occupant uses his legs and/or hands to change the seat position. In the most ubiquitous of the reclining chairs: the office task chairs, the chair occupant compresses a spring when he pushes the seat backwards with his legs.
The seat will remain reclined as long as the occupant keeps the spring compressed. When the occupant relaxes the pressure that he puts on the seat back board, the seat rotates forward to its upright position.
In the present invention, when the occupant pushes with his legs against the chair vertical back board, the whole seat reclines backwards while the center of gravity of the seat-occupant entirety system rises. This increase in potential energy of the system, will allow gravity, all by itself, to bring the seat forward when the occupant relaxes his push. Here,
By introducing a friction factor between the raceways and the runners, we increase the acceptable effort that an occupant has to apply to recline the seat. But this friction, acting as a brake, is a must for slowing the forces of gravity that want to bring the seat forward (toward the upright position). By having the friction slowing the seat motions, the occupant may chose any forward reclining position by just releasing the pressure that he exerts against the back seat, and the seat will slowly rotate forward. The friction will also make it easier to keep a balanced seat ‘locked’ in place
In the present invention the friction coefficients would vary with the materials used to manufacture the raceways and the runners, while different shapes and position of these runners and raceways, by exerting different forces—for the same occupant weight—over the sliding surfaces will require different amounts of efforts to pivot the seat.
If we didn't introduce a reasonably friction factor, like if the seat rotated with an extremely low friction around a ball bearing guided shaft, the seat positions would be extremely unstable, and the chair useless.
In
The plastic insert 49 is the raceway, snapped into a corresponding hole machined on one side of the tubular member 47. On its travels, the free wheel 39 follows the inside shape of the raceway, thus tilting the attached seat accordingly.
Here, the raceway, represented by the plastic or metal insert 51 is glued to the wooden block 50, that in turn is glued to the seat panel 24. The runner 53 is a stud welded to the frame member 47. 52 is a plastic cap covering the stud's end.
In this embodiment the runners remain fixed while the raceways slide over them.
Since a reclinable seat is always back heavy, an unoccupied seat may slowly creep backward, or the seat wouldn't stay in the upright position when the chair is moved around. This could be avoided by using a spring, as shown in prior
The long dashed lines 56 indicates the raceway wall thickness.
Intermittently in the past, I meant—liberally—by a runner: the ends of a rod or a plastic piece that rolls, slides, coast or glides inside a raceway.
An alternate embodiment of this invention is illustrated in
In an assembled mechanism the cover plate 69 is fastened to the raceway 61 by means of screws that, due to their small sizes are not shown.
Here, 71 are clearance holes for the screws and 72 are the threaded holes used for fastening the cover plate 69 to the raceway 61.
The functions of the cover plate 69 are multiple. It covers the components of the mechanism, hence, is a decorative piece. It also keeps the chair occupant's fingers out of harms ways, since the mechanism has pinching points. But a more important function would be to check the motions of the runners. In the present illustration, the openings 74 and 75 are slots concentric with the raceway(s), and having well defined ends. Its obvious that both ends of each slot could be used to stop the rotation or tilting of a smug fitting runner—and by extension since the runners are part of the seat—be the seat stops at the upright and at the fully reclined positions—in addition of other seat stops—as could be the case of the front runner 62 in the opening 74 in this illustration. In this embodiment, the cover plate 69 also checks the upward motions of the runners, since raceway 61 only has the lower path. Numeral 76 is the cover plate opening for the prong 70. The horizontal member 47 could also have been a carved wooden piece, instead of a metallic piece, if it was considered strong enough for the application.
In
Numeral 61 is the raceway represented by the convex arc of a circular segment fastened to the horizontal member 47 by screws 73. 62 and 63 are the front and rear runners respectively, sliding over the arc of the raceway 61. Up to now, the upper and lower paths of all the raceways were done into one piece, but in this embodiment they are found in two different pieces. The lower path is provided by the arc of the circular segment 61, that we will keep calling the raceway, and the upper path(s) are provided by the upper edges of the cover plate 69 openings that are circular rings sectors concentric with the raceway.
Here, the rectangles 66 would be the position of the prongs in the assembled mechanism. 67 is an elastic elements, e.g.: a tension spring engaging at one end the prong 70 and at the other end to the anchor 68. 72 are threaded holes used to fastening the cover plate 69.
This would be the position of the runners, prongs and spring when the seat is at the upright position. Notice here that the front runner 62 is stopped here by the inside face of the lower leg or flange of the channel 47.
Stopping the runners, or the prongs, would stop the further rotation of the seat.
In other embodiments the stops could be part of the raceway 61 or the cover plate 69.
When the seat rotates or tilts backward, the runners 62 and 63 slide backward over the raceway 61, to their reclined position shown here by the phantom lines of 62a and 63a respectively. 66a would be the new positions of the prongs 66. Likewise, the spring 67 is stretched to the new position 70a (shown in phantom lines), of the prong 70.
Notice that when the rear runner 63 reaches its 63a position it is stop from further traveling by its interfering with the lower flange of the channel 47, thus becoming the farther reclined position attainable by the seat.
In prior embodiments the runners were housed in slots that limited their vertical displacements. In normal operation the runners are only in sliding contact with the lower path of the raceway because the weight of the seat-occupant entirety forces always the runners downward. But it may happen when the seat is at one of the extreme positions: upright or fully reclined, that, if the chair occupant forced the seat against its stops, some runners will be forced against the upper paths of the slot. Another instance would be when the chair is lifted by the seat, pressing all the runners against the upper path of the raceways. But these vertical motions occur only in very rare circumstances, and in none of them the runners slide over the upper path of the slots. That's why in the embodiment shown in
In
In some instances were the load on the runners is low, like in some child chairs, given enough cover plate thickness, the raceway could be eliminated and the openings or slots in the cover plates 69 becomes the raceway with its lower and upper path, and the ends of the slot becoming the upright and reclining seat stops. In this possible embodiment, the cover plate would be directly attached to the channel 47 as an insert.
In another embodiment of the cover plate 69, as shown in
While the invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiment, it is apparent that various changes can be made without departing from the scoop and teachings of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present application is related to my U.S. Pat. No. 4,819,986 “Reclining chair with suspended seating”; my U.S. Pat. No. 4,880,273 “Reclining chair having suspended seating”, and my Canadian Patent 2,002,009 “Reclining chair having suspended seating”. These being the only known patents that refer specifically to four legged or sled chairs having a spring-less reclinable seating. The applicant claim priority of Disclosure Document # 531771 dated May 22, 2003 plus the Provisional Patent Application No. 60/485,067 filed Jul. 7, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60485067 | Jul 2003 | US |