The present disclosure relates to closure mechanisms for reclosable pouches, and more particularly, to such closure mechanisms that create a desirable sound for the user during closure.
Thermoplastic bags are used to store various items. Typically, a closure mechanism allows selective sealing and unsealing of the bag. Use of closure mechanisms has been widely used and well understood in the art. Some examples are illustrated in the following: U.S. Pat. No. 3,656,147 discloses a plastic bag having male and female resealable interlocking elements integrally attached thereto for selectively opening and closing an end of the bag; U.S. Pat. No. 6,138,329 discloses a reclosable bag having an assembly that includes first and second male arrow-shaped profiles extending perpendicularly from a first base; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,167,597 discloses a zipper strip for a reclosable package, wherein the zipper strip includes a male and a female profile, wherein each male member has an asymmetrical arrow shape so that the zipper is easier to open from one side than the other.
Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,542, issued to Cisek on Oct. 11, 2005, discloses a bag closure device with a stepped deflection of the closure device to result in a popping sound as the closure is opened or closed. U.S. Pat. No. 5,647,100, issued to Porchia et al. on Jul. 15, 1997 (the '100 patent), discloses a deforming head apparatus for creating indentations in a portion of a bag zipper to create a bumpy feel and/or an audible clicking sound upon opening and closing.
Still further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,727, issued to Dais et al. on Aug. 25, 1992 (the '727 patent), discloses a zipper for a reclosable bag which produced a bumpy feel and/or an audible clicking sound. The zipper of the '727 patent has two opposing, longitudinally extending interlockable rib and groove profiles configured so that intermittent parts of the profiles are structurally discontinuous along a length thereof. The intermittent parts are created by a deformer wheel such that the segments with indentions have lesser relative length than those segments without indentions so as to minimize the likelihood or incidence of liquid leakage through the interlocked zipper.
Despite the advances in zippers for plastic bags, deficiencies remain in that one cannot be sure that the zipper is properly closed to seal the bag. For example, although the zipper may produce an audible sound, the sound may not be easily heard or recognized as closing the bag by the user.
There is a need for an improved zipper which produces a desirable sound upon closing and opening that allows a user to clearly discern that the bag is adequately closed. The subject technology is directed to a zipper for a bag that produces a more optimal sound for the user. In one embodiment, the closure sound is a relatively lower frequency (i.e., deeper) and higher level (i.e., louder) sound.
In one embodiment, the subject technology is directed to a zipper for a reclosable bag including an elongated groove profile having two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel, and an elongated rib profile opposing the groove profile. A plurality of first segments of the rib profile alternate with a plurality of second segments of the rib profile to create a structural discontinuity along a length thereof. The first segments have larger cross-sections and shorter lengths than the second segments such that interlocking the groove and rib profiles creates the audible clicking sound when the groove and rib profiles are engaged.
Preferably, a ratio of the length of the second segments to the length of the first segments is greater than one. For example, the length of the first segments is less than about 0.152 of an inch {3.86080 mm}, the length of the second segments is greater than about 0.157 of an inch {3.98780 mm}, and the channel generally has a transverse diameter of about 0.0375 of an inch {0.95250 mm}.
The rib profile also defines a stem extending from a base and terminating in a head, the stem being substantially unchanged between the first and second segments. A ratio of a thickness of the head to a thickness of the stem is about 2:1 in the first segments. In one embodiment, the thickness of the head in the first segments being in a range of 0.02989 inches {0.75921 mm} plus and minus one standard deviation of 0.00218 inches {0.0553720 mm} and the thickness of the head in the second segments is less than or equal to 0.0245 inches {0.62230 m}. The corresponding opening is about 0.010 of an inch {0.25400 mm} when the rib and groove profiles are separated. The groove profile includes a distal hook on each arm to provide: resistance to the rib profile interlocking within the channel; retention of the rib profile therein; and a sealing interface between the rib and groove profiles.
In another embodiment, the subject technology is directed to a zipper for a reclosable bag that generates audible sound continually therealong when interlocked. The zipper includes an elongated groove profile having two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel, and an elongated rib profile opposing the groove profile. The rib profile includes a head to provide resistance to interlocking within the channel. A ratio of a thickness of the head of the rib profile to the opening of the groove profile is about 3:1 such that interlocking the groove and rib profiles creates the audible sound. The rib profile includes a stem extending from a base and terminating in the head and a second ratio of the thickness of the head to a thickness of the stem is about 2:1.
Still another embodiment is directed to an elongated including a groove profile having two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel, and a rib profile opposing the groove profile, wherein the rib profile includes a head to provide resistance to interlocking within the channel and a ratio of a thickness of the head of the rib profile to the opening of the groove profile is about 3:1, and a plurality of first segments of the rib profile alternate with a plurality of second segments of the rib profile to create a structural discontinuity along a length thereof, the first segments having larger cross-sections and shorter lengths than the second segments such that interlocking the groove and rib profiles creates the audible clicking sound. Each of these zippers may also be used in recloseable pouches that define an interior by a first wall and a second wall opposing and partially sealed to the first wall to form a mouth for access to the interior.
Another embodiment of the subject technology is directed to a zipper for a reclosable bag including an elongated groove profile having two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel, and an elongated rib profile opposing the groove profile, wherein a plurality of first segments of the rib profile alternate with a plurality of second segments of the rib profile to create a structural discontinuity along a length thereof, wherein during interlocking the groove and rib profiles, an audible clicking sound of at least 50 dB on average is created during opening and closing. Preferably, a ratio of the length of the second segments to the length of the first segments is greater than one and a ratio of a thickness of a head to a thickness of a stem of the rib profile is about 2:1 in the first segments.
Another embodiment is a zipper for a reclosable bag that generates audible sound therealong when interlocked. The zipper includes an elongated groove profile, and an elongated rib profile opposing the groove profile, wherein an audible clicking sound of at least 50 dB on average is created during closing. Preferably, the elongated groove profile has two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel and the rib profile includes a head to provide resistance to interlocking within the channel, and the rib profile includes a stem extending from a base and terminating in the head, wherein a ratio of a thickness of the head to a thickness of the stem of the rib profile is about 2:1 in a plurality of segments.
In one embodiment, a plurality of first segments of the rib profile alternate with a plurality of second segments of the rib profile to create a structural discontinuity along a length thereof, the first segments having larger cross-sections and shorter lengths than the second segments, the thickness of the head in the first segments being in a range of 0.0299 of an inch {0.75946 mm} with a standard deviation of about 0.0022 of an inch {0.0.5588 mm}, the thickness of the head in the second segments is less than or equal to 0.0245 of an inch {0.62230 mm}, and the opening is about 0.010 of an inch {0.2540 mm} such that interlocking the groove and rib profiles creates an audible clicking sound.
Still another embodiment is a recloseable pouch defining an interior including a first wall, a second wall opposing and partially sealed to the first wall to form a mouth for access to the interior, and a closure mechanism for selectively sealing the opening. The closure mechanism includes an elongated groove profile having two arms which form a general U-shape to define an opening to a channel, and an elongated rib profile opposing the groove profile, wherein a plurality of first segments of the rib profile alternate with a plurality of second segments of the rib profile to create a structural discontinuity along a length thereof such that interlocking the groove and rib profiles creates an audible clicking sound of at least 50 dB on average during closing. Preferably, the zipper creates an audible clicking sound between 54 and 61 dB, and more particularly an audible clicking sound having an average of about 57 dB.
It should be appreciated that the present technology can be implemented and utilized in numerous ways, including without limitation as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, a method for applications now known and later developed. These and other unique features of the technology disclosed herein will become more readily apparent from the following description and the accompanying drawings.
So that those having ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed system appertains will more readily understand how to make and use the same, reference may be had to the following drawings.
The present disclosure overcomes many of the prior art problems associated with sealing storage bags and the like. The advantages and other features of the technology disclosed herein, will become more readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art from the following detailed description of certain preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings which set forth representative embodiments of the present invention and wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural elements. Unless otherwise specified, the illustrated embodiments can be understood as providing exemplary features of varying detail of certain embodiments, and therefore, unless otherwise specified, features, components, modules, elements, and/or aspects of the illustrations can be otherwise modified, combined, interconnected, sequenced, separated, interchanged, positioned, and/or rearranged without materially departing from the disclosed systems or methods. It is also noted that the accompanying drawings are somewhat idealized in that, for example without limitation, features are shown as substantially smooth and uniform when in practice, manufacturing variances and abnormalities would occur as is knows to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Referring to
Referring to
The zipper profiles 40, 41 may also produce a vibratory or bumpy feel during closure. The audible clicking and vibratory or bumpy feel on zipping are considered separable features of the present technology. Accordingly, a zipper may produce an audible clicking sound when zipped without imparting a vibratory or bumpy feel and vice versa while still being within the scope of the present technology.
Referring now to
In segments 100, groove arms 47 have hooks 49 at the distal free ends whereas in segments 102, the arms 47 have no such hooks. The indentions within segments 102 are manifest by the lack of such hooks. The groove arms 47 of segments 100 have surfaces 98 which are generally planar and perpendicular to the longitudinal extension of the groove arms 47. Segments 102 define surfaces 99 which are generally planar and positioned at about right angles to surfaces 98.
Referring now to
The segments 104 and the head portion 46a, 46b have surfaces 109, which interact with the groove profile 41 to create an audible clicking noise and a bumpy feel during closing. The surfaces 109 also produce an audible clicking noise and a bumpy feel during opening the profiles 40, 41 as well. Although shown as having a transition area between the segments 104, 106 that is at about right angles to the length of the rib profile 40, the transition between the segments 104, 106 may taper somewhat.
Referring now additionally to
Still referring to
In the segments 106, the head portion 46b is generally deformed at the widest portion 51b to a more generally bulbous shape. The term “bulbous” as used herein includes not only rounded cross-sections but also a generally arrow-shaped, triangular-shaped, quatrefoil-shaped, and like configurations in cross-section as may be created during deformation. Preferably, the deformation within segments 106 is largely removal of the widest part 51b of the head portion 46 of the segments 104 comparatively.
Still referring to
Zippers of the present technology may have a plurality of intermittent or alternating segments of differing shape along one or both of the profiles, but preferably have intermittent or alternating segments of two different shapes as in the embodiments illustrated herein. The segments of differing shape may be of equal or unequal length. Surprisingly, the segments having indentions or deformations of greater relative length than those segments not having indentions optimizes the resulting audible clicking noise according to user preference without a loss in performance despite conventional wisdom that such an arrangement would perform poorly.
Preferably, a ratio of the length of the deformed segments 106 to the length of the undeformed segments 104 is greater than one. More preferably, the length of the undeformed segments is less than about 0.152 of an inch {3.86080 mm} and the length of the deformed segments 106 is greater than about 0.157 of an inch {3.98780 mm}. In one embodiment, the length of each segment with an indention is preferably about 0.175 of an inch {4.44500 mm} whereas segments without an indentation are about 0.147 of an inch {3.73380 mm}.
Again, while not bound by any particular theory, the audible clicking sound and the vibratory or bumpy feel associated with the zipper 43 are believed to result from the hooks 49 of the groove arms 47 contacting the planar surfaces 107 and 109 of head 46 as the profiles 40, 41 are interlocked along the length of the zipper 43. The extended length of the deformed segments 102, 104 contributes to the lower frequency of the sound and the oversizing of the head portion 46a, 46b with respect to the opening 54 contributes to the louder sound. The various elements of the profiles 40, 41 are proportioned and configured so that an optimal audible indication of closure is provided surprisingly without compromising the seal between the profiles 40, 41 or making the profiles 40, 41 too stiff to close or interlock without applying excessive force.
To provide an indication of the proportions of the various elements of the profiles 40, 41 with respect to one another for accomplishing these purposes, it has been found desirable for the upper laterally-disposed portions of the head 46a in segments 104 to be sized so that the widest part 51a the head portion 46a does not push the groove profile 41 open after insertion. The widest part 51a of the head portion 46a is substantial enough to provide some resistance to the interlocking of the profiles 40, 41 and, in this regard, are each preferably from about 0.029 to about 0.031 inches thick {0.73660 to 0.78740 mm} (measured from side to side at a maximum width).
The corresponding groove profile 41 is preferably dimensioned so that the opening 54 or juncture of the groove arms 47 with the hooks 49 is about 0.006 to about 0.015 of an inch {0.15240 to 0.38100 mm}. Generally, the groove arms 47 are from about 0.015 to about 0.019 inches {0.38100 to 0.48260 mm} apart. In a preferred embodiment, the opening 54 to the channel 55 is approximately 0.010 of an inch {0.25400 mm}. The hooks 49 are preferably from about 0.006 to about 0.020 inches {0.15240 to 0.50800 mm} in length, and the groove base 41a is preferably from about 0.005 to about 0.020 of an inch {0.12700 to 0.50800 mm} in thickness.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art, the subject technology is applicable to any type of bag, pouch, package, and various other storage containers with significant advantages for sandwich and quart size bags. The subject technology is also particularly adaptable to double zipper or closure mechanisms such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,137,736 issued on Nov. 21, 2006 to Pawloski et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,298 issued on Aug. 12, 2008 also to Pawloski, each entitled “Closure Device for a Reclosable Pouch” and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In a multiple closure mechanism arrangement, such as a double zipper arrangement, the subject technology may be used for one or both of the closure mechanisms.
Now referring to
The deformer ring 70 has an annular body 72 with a plurality of teeth 74 formed on an outer circumference thereof. A throughbore 76 is formed in the annular body 72 to receive a dowel 78, which facilitates mounting the deformer ring 70 to the deforming apparatus. The teeth 74 are separated by gaps 80, which create a tooth arc length 82 and gap arc length 84 on the outermost portion of the deformer ring 70. In use, it is the size of the tooth arc length 82 and the gap arc length 84 that form the structural discontinuity in the profiles 40, 41. Preferably, the tooth arc length 82 is about 0.175 of an inch {4.44500 mm} and the gap arc length 84 is about 0.148 of an inch {3.75920 mm}.
One process for making a thermoplastic zipper 43 for a reclosable thermoplastic bag using the deformer ring includes the step of continuously extruding a longitudinally extending first zipper profile having a part interlockable with a longitudinally extending opposing second zipper profile while restricting at intervals the flow of molten polymer to a profile plate for forming the first zipper profile. Part of the first zipper profile is made intermittently structurally discontinuous along its length and defines at least a first undeformed segment of about 0.148 of an inch {3.75920 mm} and a second deformed segment of about 0.175 of an inch {4.44500 mm} therein characterized by cross-sections of different sizes but a common configuration imparting an audible clicking sound continually there along when the profiles are interlocked or separated from each other. The process may also interlock the first and second profiles so that the segmented part of the first profile is substantially free of interdigitation with the second profile.
An apparatus for making such a longitudinally extending zipper for a reclosable thermoplastic bag would include an extruder for providing longitudinally extending first and second profiles having a longitudinally extending part interlockable with a longitudinally extending opposing second zipper profile and a deformer ring for deforming the part to form indentions therein intermittently along its length at a desired spacing at any selected linespeed.
In one preferred embodiment of zipper 43, the undeformed segments 100, 104 of a length equal to about 0.147 of an inch {3.73380 mm} and deformed segments 102, 106 of a length equal to about 0.175 of an inch {4.44500 mm}. The thickness of the head portion 46a in the regular segments 104 of the rib profile 40 was about 0.02989 of an inch {0.75921 mm} and the thickness of the head portion 46b in the deformed segments 106 was about 0.0245 of an inch {0.62230 mm}. The opening 54 to the channel 55 of the groove profile 41 was about 0.010 of an inch {0.25400 mm} when the rib and groove profiles 40, 41 are separated.
A palmograph unit (shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,154,086 and 5,647,100) is used to determine the degree of vibratory feel and the average closing force of prior art zippers and zippers in accordance with the subject technology. Generally, a palmograph unit performs three main functions: (1) closing the zipper; (2) monitoring the force required to close the zipper and the oscillations in closing force; and (3) analyzing the force required to close the zipper.
For palmograph values, prior art zippers as shown and described in FIG. 5 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,298 patent (the “prior art zipper”) are tested. For comparison, a plurality of zippers in accordance with the subject technology or preferred zippers are also tested. The preferred zippers are similar to the prior art zippers in that each included first and second closure mechanisms. The inner or product side zipper was unchanged, namely a single hook for a male profile. However, the outer or consumer side zipper is the new and improved clicking zipper with the modifications described herein. The test bags utilized a film for sidewall of approximately 0.075 of an inch {0.1905 mm}.
The palmograph results surprisingly showed that closing force and palmograph values remained relatively unchanged. One of ordinary knowledge in the pertinent art would have expected the relatively larger deformed segments 100, 104 and/or the oversized head portion 46a, 46b would detrimentally impact the closing force.
Turning to measuring user preference (known as “paragon” values), the frequency of the audible clicking is an important factor in determining user preference. The same zippers were tested. The preferred embodiment in accordance with the subject disclosure exhibits a lower frequency or deeper sound, which was more easily heard, recognized, and preferred by users.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The sound acquisition system 200 includes a chamber 202 defining a sound dampening interior. The chamber 202 has an opening covered by a door 204, shown in a closed condition. The sound acquisition system 200 also includes an adjacent and preferably isolated motor unit 206 utilized for actuating opening and closing of zippers 43. The motor unit 206 rotates a spool 208 to wind and unwind thread 210 coupled to the zipper 43. An actuation switch 239 can turn the motor unit 206 on to move the spool 208 at a substantially consistent speed so that the resulting opening and closing occurs at a consistent speed. The thread 210 couples to the zipper 43 in an interference free manner. Referring now additionally to
Referring now to
Within the interior, a fixture 214 selectively provides an opening or closing force against the zipper 43 under test. The fixture 214 includes a fixed lower pedestal 219 surrounded by egg crate foam or other sound dampening material 216 and a rotatably mounted arm 232. The pedestal 219 and arm 232 have adapters 218 for engaging the zipper 43 to provide a closing force. The adapters 218 are roughly T-shaped to provide opposing distal low friction planar surfaces 221 as best seen in
A microphone assembly 226 also mounts within the interior adjacent the pedestal 219 to capture the sound therein. Preferably, the microphone assembly 226 is moveably mounted so that a distance to the pedestal 219 can be adjusted as desired. The microphone assembly 226 connects to the data recorder. The microphone assembly 226 includes a plastic cap (not shown) to protect the microphone diaphragm from dust and incidental contact. The protective cap should only be removed from the microphone assembly 226 when making measurements after powering up the sound acquisition system 200. When not in use, the protective cap is replaced and care should be taken to not touch the microphone diaphragm or allow any object to come in contact therewith.
For capturing sound during closing, the zipper 43 is partially interlocked so that an engaged or closed end 237 of the profiles 40, 41 can be placed between the opposing surfaces 221 with the opening towards the microphone assembly 226. The clip assembly 224 attaches to the closed end 237 of the zipper 43 and the door 204 to the chamber is closed. The motor unit 206 is activated to rotate the spool 208, pulling the thread 210 and, in turn, drawing the zipper 43 through the surfaces 221. As the open end 230 of the zipper profiles 40, 41 passes through the adapters 218, the profiles 40, 41 are urged together into an interlocking position with the resulting sound described above.
The chamber 202 may also be configured to disengage the profiles 40, 41. The adapter 218 is removed from the pedestal 218 and the arm 232 is rotated out of the way. A different block (not shown) is mounted on the pedestal 219 that has an upstanding screw or finger. By placing an open end of a closed zipper over the upstanding screw, using the clip to connect the zipper, and drawing the zipper across the screw, the zipper is opened to record the sound generated thereby.
The pedestal 219 may also receive a block (not shown) for actuating a slider type zipper. The slider actuating block may be very similar to a slider commonly used as an actuating member for resealable packages, which is simply held in position by a shoulder formed on the slider block. Preferably, the shoulder forms an aperture to allow the zipper to easily and quietly pass. For a slider example, see U.S. Pat. No. 7,797,802 entitled “Actuating Member for a Closure Assembly and Method” issued on Sep. 21, 2010 to Ackerman, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Accordingly, for capturing sound during opening, the same basic components can be utilized but simply arranged in a reverse order of having a mostly closed zipper pulled there through.
The interior of the chamber also may deploy various sensors and the like (not shown) that provide further information to the data recorder. For example, the temperature, pressure and humidity may be controlled and monitored within the interior of the chamber 202.
After assembling the sound acquisition system 200, the process to collect the sound data may begin. Initially, turn on the power to the components including the microphone and data recorder and wait approximately 100 seconds for the capacitive circuits of the power supply and the like to charge before making measurements. Preferably, the data recorder has A-weighted sound for reduction of low frequency hum from, for example, HVAC systems and motors but the gain is applied to the non-weighted signal. Therefore, the power supply amplifier can be overloaded by low frequency hum if a high gain is used even though the level is relatively low after passing through the A-weighting conditioner. The sound may be monitored with headphones from a de coupled output, which may have a slight de offset. If low frequency distortion is heard through the headphones or if a threshold voltage (e.g., 5 V) is exceeded on the microphone power supply, the gain on the microphone power supply should be reduced. The speed of the motor should be set such that individual clicks can be discerned. If the motor speed is set incorrectly, the sound data can have clicks discarded and the resulting filtered waveform reanalyzed. For overestimation of motor speed, fewer clicks can be used. For underestimation of motor speed, more clicks can be used.
The following is a description of a process for capturing the sound data. The process uses the following notation:
Before testing any zippers, the sound acquisition system 200 is used to acquire a waveform of background noise. The background noise waveform is filtered using a 4-th order high pass Butterworth filter with a 500 Hz cutoff frequency, then the filtered background amplitude, VB=2√2*Vrms is calculated in order to select a desired signal-to-noise ratio, e.g. AB=1.2. An inspection time interval equal to about 5% of the expected median period between clicks should be used, e.g., □t=0.05*T=0.05*x/Vt
The following steps are preferably repeated for a statistically significant number of zipper samples. In this example, a closing or sealing test is performed. The sound acquisition system 200 acquires a waveform of a zipper clicking closed. The clicking waveform is filtered using a 4-th order high pass Butterworth filter with a 500 Hz cutoff frequency. The leading and trailing data are discarded where Vp-p<AB*VB, The user selects a quiescent voltage threshold gain, e.g. AQ=1.1 and calculates a quiescent voltage threshold, VQ=AQ*22*Vrms.
Next, the sound acquisition system 200 removes the inspection intervals where Vmax or |Vmin|>VQ/2 and recalculates the quiescent voltage threshold, VQ=AQ √{square root over (2)}*Vrms to yield a filtered waveform. By analyzing the filtered waveform, the sound acquisition system 200 determines a first quiescent period where Vmax and |Vmin|<VQ/2. From the first quiescent period, the sound acquisition system 200 determines the beginning of the next click period where Vmax or |Vmin|>VQ/2. Update Vc
Upon reaching the end of the waveform, the sound acquisition system 200 evaluates the most recent click and discards the most recent click if the last time interval was not quiescent. The sound acquisition system 200 may provide a warning to the operator if ft is exceeded based on mode (most common) interval between clicks. If ft was not exceeded, the sound acquisition system 200 may proceed to eliminate the clicks acquired while accelerating at the beginning and decelerating at the end of the process according to the fm criteria, i.e. large separation between clicks. The sound acquisition system 200 may also fill in missing clicks with the maximum and minimum over a sub-interval where a click should be.
Upon finishing computation of the waveform, the data recorder of the sound acquisition system 200 records all the click voltage amplitudes for conversion into sound pressure levels as shown in
The pressure level conversion utilizes the assumption that the root-mean-square amplitude of the click waveform can be effectively approximated by a sine wave to result in the following formula:
The sound acquisition system 200 calculate statistics to create a bar graph of the sound pressure level as an A-weighted decibel level for each measured zipper click as shown in
Based upon testing, it has been determined that for frequencies below 4 kHz, the effects of ambient temperature and pressure over the ranges 16° C.-30° C. and 925 mbar-1025 mbar, are less than ±0.1 dB. Unless condensation forms, the effect of relative humidity is less than 0.1 dB. The long term stability of the sound acquisition system 200 is very good, with less than a 1 dB change in 250 years. The sound acquisition system 200 has a linear 0° incidence free-field frequency response from 7 Hz to 12.5 kHz+2, −3 dB and a dynamic range of −2.5 dB(A)-102 dB.
Periodically, the microphone calibration should be checked as is known to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. The sensitivity adjustment related to the microphone should be adjusted so that Vrms=3.368V at linear output for power supply gain of 0 dB and pre-amp gain +20 dB. Also, an operator should use the measuring amplifier reference voltage and adjust sensitivity for the actual K0 value given on the microphone's calibration chart.
In view of the above, the novel structure of the closure member of the present technology advantageously provides a significant unexpected improvement in paragon and loudness, surprisingly without detrimentally impacting palmograph performance or closing force compared to commercially available zippers.
All patents published patent applications and other references disclosed herein are hereby expressly incorporated in their entireties by reference.
While the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various changes and/or modifications can be made to the invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, each claim may depend from any or all claims in a multiple dependent manner even though such has not been originally claimed.
This application claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,350, filed Nov. 19, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/916,026 filed Oct. 29, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,327,875 on May 3, 2016, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/916,005 filed Oct. 29, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,118 on Mar. 10, 2015, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2035674 | Sipe | Mar 1936 | A |
2822012 | Abraham | Feb 1958 | A |
3338284 | Steven | Aug 1967 | A |
3416585 | Staller | Dec 1968 | A |
3808649 | Ausnit | May 1974 | A |
3937395 | Lawes | Feb 1976 | A |
RE28969 | Naito | Sep 1976 | E |
4186786 | Kirkpatrick | Feb 1980 | A |
4191076 | Bollmer et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4285105 | Kirkpatrick | Aug 1981 | A |
4372014 | Simpson | Feb 1983 | A |
4419159 | Herrington | Dec 1983 | A |
4428788 | Kamp | Jan 1984 | A |
4479244 | Ausnit | Oct 1984 | A |
4484352 | Katzin | Nov 1984 | A |
4515647 | Behr | May 1985 | A |
4522678 | Zieke | Jun 1985 | A |
4532652 | Herrington | Jul 1985 | A |
4555282 | Yano | Nov 1985 | A |
4561108 | Kamp | Dec 1985 | A |
4561109 | Herrington | Dec 1985 | A |
4562027 | Behr et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4578813 | Ausnit | Mar 1986 | A |
4586319 | Ausnit | May 1986 | A |
4615045 | Siegel | Sep 1986 | A |
4618383 | Herrington | Oct 1986 | A |
4655862 | Christoff et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4672723 | Hugues et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4673383 | Bentsen | Jun 1987 | A |
4676851 | Scheibner | Jun 1987 | A |
4683015 | Wagers | Jul 1987 | A |
4698118 | Takahashi | Oct 1987 | A |
4701358 | Behr et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4709399 | Sanders | Nov 1987 | A |
4709400 | Bruno | Nov 1987 | A |
4710968 | Borchardt | Dec 1987 | A |
4736451 | Ausnit | Apr 1988 | A |
4736496 | Fisher et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741789 | Zieke et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755248 | Geiger | Jul 1988 | A |
4764977 | Wagers | Aug 1988 | A |
4787880 | Ausnit | Nov 1988 | A |
4788282 | Deziel | Nov 1988 | A |
4791710 | Nocek et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4792240 | Ausnit | Dec 1988 | A |
4796300 | Branson | Jan 1989 | A |
4812056 | Zieke | Mar 1989 | A |
4812192 | Woods et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822539 | Tilman | Apr 1989 | A |
4829641 | Williams | May 1989 | A |
4832768 | Takahashi | May 1989 | A |
4834554 | Stetler, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4846586 | Bruno | Jul 1989 | A |
4859259 | Scheibner | Aug 1989 | A |
4869725 | Schneider et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4898492 | Janowski | Feb 1990 | A |
4906310 | Broderick et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4907321 | Williams | Mar 1990 | A |
4941238 | Clark | Jul 1990 | A |
4964739 | Branson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5009828 | McCree | Apr 1991 | A |
5012561 | Porchia et al. | May 1991 | A |
5017021 | Simonsen | May 1991 | A |
5022530 | Zieke | Jun 1991 | A |
5023122 | Boeckmann et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5049223 | Dais et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053091 | Giljam et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5056933 | Kamp | Oct 1991 | A |
5067822 | Wirth et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070584 | Dais et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5092684 | Weeks | Mar 1992 | A |
5138750 | Gundlach | Aug 1992 | A |
5140727 | Dais et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141577 | Porchia et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154086 | Porchia | Oct 1992 | A |
5167454 | Woods et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184896 | Hammond et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192135 | Woods et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198055 | Wirth et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209574 | Tilman | May 1993 | A |
5211481 | Tilman | May 1993 | A |
5235731 | Anzai et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5238306 | Heintz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248201 | Kettner et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252281 | Kettner | Oct 1993 | A |
5259904 | Ausnit | Nov 1993 | A |
5307552 | Dais et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326176 | Domke | Jul 1994 | A |
5345659 | Allan | Sep 1994 | A |
5356222 | Kettner | Oct 1994 | A |
5358334 | Simonsen | Oct 1994 | A |
5366294 | Wirth et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368394 | Scott | Nov 1994 | A |
5369847 | Naya et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382094 | Ausnit | Jan 1995 | A |
5384942 | Siegel | Jan 1995 | A |
5388910 | Koyanagi | Feb 1995 | A |
5397182 | Gaible et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403094 | Tomic | Apr 1995 | A |
5405561 | Dais | Apr 1995 | A |
5415904 | Takubo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5462360 | Tilman et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5478228 | Dais et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492705 | Porchia et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5509734 | Ausnit | Apr 1996 | A |
5511884 | Bruno et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525363 | Herber et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527112 | Dais et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5558493 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5575747 | Dais | Nov 1996 | A |
5577305 | Johnson | Nov 1996 | A |
5588187 | Swain | Dec 1996 | A |
5611627 | Belias et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618111 | Porchia | Apr 1997 | A |
5647100 | Porchia et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655273 | Tomic et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660479 | May et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664299 | Porchia | Sep 1997 | A |
5669715 | Dobreski | Sep 1997 | A |
5672009 | Malin | Sep 1997 | A |
5686126 | Noel et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689866 | Kasai | Nov 1997 | A |
5713669 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718024 | Robbins | Feb 1998 | A |
5720557 | Simonsen | Feb 1998 | A |
5722128 | Toney et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729876 | Johnson | Mar 1998 | A |
5747126 | Van Erden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749658 | Kettner | May 1998 | A |
5769772 | Wiley | Jun 1998 | A |
5774955 | Borchardt et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5775812 | St. Phillips | Jul 1998 | A |
5794315 | Crabtree | Aug 1998 | A |
5804265 | Saad et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809621 | McCree | Sep 1998 | A |
5817380 | Tanaka | Oct 1998 | A |
5827163 | Kettner | Oct 1998 | A |
5832145 | Dais | Nov 1998 | A |
5832570 | Thorpe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836056 | Porchia et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839831 | Mazzocchi | Nov 1998 | A |
D406685 | McGinnis | Mar 1999 | S |
5878468 | Tomic | Mar 1999 | A |
5902046 | Shibata | May 1999 | A |
5911508 | Dobreski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927855 | Tomic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930877 | Thorpe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933927 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934806 | Tomic | Aug 1999 | A |
5950285 | Porchia | Sep 1999 | A |
5953796 | McMahon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955160 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962040 | Dais et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964532 | St. Phillips et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967663 | Vaquero | Oct 1999 | A |
5988880 | Tomic | Nov 1999 | A |
6009603 | Gallagher | Jan 2000 | A |
6010244 | Dobreski et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014795 | McMahon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021557 | Dais et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030122 | Ramsey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032437 | Bois | Mar 2000 | A |
6071011 | Thomas | Jun 2000 | A |
6074096 | Tilman | Jun 2000 | A |
6077208 | Larkin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080252 | Plourde | Jun 2000 | A |
6110586 | Johnson | Aug 2000 | A |
6112374 | Van Erden | Sep 2000 | A |
6135636 | Randall | Oct 2000 | A |
6138329 | Johnson | Oct 2000 | A |
6139186 | Fraser | Oct 2000 | A |
6148588 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149302 | Taheri | Nov 2000 | A |
6152600 | Tomic | Nov 2000 | A |
6156363 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164825 | Larkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167597 | Malin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170696 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170985 | Shabram, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187396 | Moller | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210038 | Tomic | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217215 | Tomic | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217216 | Taheri | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220754 | Stiglic | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221484 | Leiter | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228484 | Willert-Porada et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228485 | Leiter | May 2001 | B1 |
6231236 | Tilman | May 2001 | B1 |
6257763 | Stolmeier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279298 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286681 | Wilfong, Jr. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286999 | Cappel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293701 | Tomic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318894 | Derenthal | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321423 | Johnson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360513 | Strand et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371643 | Saad et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6386762 | Randall | May 2002 | B1 |
6398411 | Metzger | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6443617 | Tetenborg | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6461042 | Tomic | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461043 | Healy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481890 | VandenHeuvel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487758 | Shaffer | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491433 | Shabram, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6539594 | Kasai et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550966 | Saad | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553740 | Delisle | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571430 | Savicki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574939 | Heijnen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581249 | Savicki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582122 | Shimizu | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592260 | Randall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594872 | Cisek | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637937 | Bois | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6637939 | Huffer | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6686005 | White et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691383 | Linton | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692147 | Nelson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703046 | Fitzhugh | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712509 | Cappel | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6786712 | Cisek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6789946 | Plourde | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6854886 | Piechocki et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877898 | Berich et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6953542 | Cisek | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954969 | Sprehe | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962439 | Taheri | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7017240 | Savicki | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036988 | Olechowski | May 2006 | B2 |
7137736 | Pawloski et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
RE39505 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2007 | E |
7234865 | Piechocki | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241046 | Piechocki et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7305742 | Anderson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7334682 | Goepfert | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347624 | Savicki | Mar 2008 | B2 |
RE40284 | Thomas | May 2008 | E |
7410298 | Pawloski | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7517484 | Wu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534039 | Wu | May 2009 | B2 |
7543361 | Borchardt et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7651271 | Withers | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7674040 | Dowd | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8469593 | Price et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020090151 | Skeens et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020153273 | Mallik | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173414 | Leighton | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030169948 | Fenzl et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177619 | Cisek | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030210836 | Strand | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223654 | Gerrits | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223657 | Belias et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001650 | Piechocki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040078940 | Ishizaki | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040234172 | Pawloski | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040261229 | Cisek | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050063616 | Chang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050141786 | Piechocki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050271308 | Pawloski | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276524 | Taheri | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286810 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286811 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286812 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060165316 | Cheung | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070183692 | Pawloski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206888 | Chang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080292222 | Snoreck | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137995 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159662 | Dowd et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080285897 | Taheri | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090097781 | Tang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090214141 | Borchardt et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110299797 | Petkovsek | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1226817 | Oct 1966 | DE |
2504863 | Aug 1976 | DE |
510797 | Oct 1992 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,350, 15 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,350, 10 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026. |
Advisory Action dated Jul. 25, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026. |
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,005. |
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,005. |
Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,005. |
Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 13 pages. |
Advisory action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026, dated Apr. 17, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,026, dated Aug. 14, 2015, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220033146 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12950350 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 17505214 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12916026 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 12950350 | US | |
Parent | 12916005 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 12916026 | US |