The present products and methods relate to packaging and in particular to reclosable flexible flow-wrap packaging products and methods with a closure layer (label) over film having a line of weakness.
Flexible packaging is often used to retain and seal products for shipping and storage. It is commonly used for a variety of consumer products, including food products (e.g., cracker sleeves, chewing gum sticks, chocolate bars, cookies, and the like). By one approach, the package may be a film laminate and take the shape of the products contained therein. Packages can be formed by a plurality of walls sealed to form an interior cavity. Examples can include flow-wrap packaging, three-sided seals, form-filled seal, and the like.
Flow-wrap type flexible film packaging can use a continuous film (web) to envelop product during assembly. In one configuration, flow-wrap (also known as horizontal or vertical fin-seal or lap-seal wrap, end-seal wrap, horizontal bagging and pillow-pouch packaging) can position a film, such as polyethylene or polypropylene, adjacent a product, wrap the film around the product, form a seal from the ends of the film, then form seals at either side of the product. The seals can be permanent and provide some level of structural integrity. Flexible film packages have many other advantages. They can be manufactured at substantially lower cost than rigid containers, are light-weight resulting in reduced transportation costs, and pack easier resulting in less storage space.
Despite these advantages, flexible packaging can sometimes be difficult to open and is typically not suitable when a user wants to reclose/reseal a package after its initial opening, such as when there is more product within the package than for a single use. Attempts are known in the art to provide some measure of reclosure of flexible packaging using discreet closure layers (labels) that require precise label placement (registration) on the package over a configured opening in the film (See generally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,311 to Ponsi).
Accordingly, provided herein are embodiments for an easy open flexible flow-wrap package film/web having a closure layer/label laminated above a score (tear) line in the flow-wrap film, which defines a package opening. A pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) between the film and label can allow easy opening and reclosing or resealing, while maintaining package integrity.
In one embodiment, a reclosable flexible film package can have a flexible film having a fold forming a folded edge, at least two opposing free edges, and at least a front panel and a back panel, the opposing free edges being sealed together to form at least one sealed edge such that front and back panels define an interior space; a score in the flexible film of the front panel forming a flap that defines an opening when moved toward the folded edge and has a separation force for the flap from the film; and a label extending uninterrupted from edge to edge of the at least two opposing free edges, being attached on the film by pressure sensitive adhesive, and extending beyond the score on the front panel to reseal the package opening defined by the flap, the pressure sensitive adhesive having a peel strength between the film and the label that is greater than the separation force along the score, and the label further having a tack free portion defining a pull tab.
In some embodiments the label can extend beyond the folded edge to the back panel. The score line can be arcuate or a perforation. In some embodiments, the score line end can terminate in a tear propagating reduction pattern, such as a ‘J-hook’ or a ‘smile’.
In some embodiments, the label can extend equidistant on the front and back panel from the folded edge. The film can be a printed overwrap film laminate having a reverse printed OPP clear film bonded to a white OPP package film. In some embodiments, the OPP clear film can be a gauge in the range of about 90-230 and the white OPP package film can be a gauge in the range of about 90-230. In some embodiments, the OPP clear film can be about 118 gauge and the white OPP package film about 118. The label can be a BOPP clear film of a gauge in the range of about 160 to 240. In other embodiments, the film can be a BOPP clear film of a gauge of about 200. By one approach, the non-adhesive edge of the label can be a portion of the label folded onto itself so that PSA surfaces are adjacent to one another.
In one approach, a reclosable package can have a first substrate forming a plurality of panels having peripheral edges sealed to form an interior cavity for receiving items; a flap defined by a line of weakness in at least a first panel that defines an opening to the interior cavity when the first panel is separated at the line of weakness; a second substrate adhered to the first substrate and having a first portion extending beyond the line of weakness to form a package reseal zone, and a second portion extending from a portion of the first panel to a portion of the second panel and wherein the second substrate extends uninterrupted from one peripheral edge to an opposite peripheral edge. In some embodiments the line of weakness can be a perforation. In other embodiments of this approach, the first substrate can be a printed overwrap film laminate comprising a reverse printed oriented polypropylene (OPP) clear film bonded to a white OPP package film. Also, in some embodiments, the OPP clear film can be a gauge in the range of about 48-230 and the white OPP package film can be a gauge in the range of about 48-230. In other approaches, the OPP clear film can be about 118 gauge and the white OPP package film is about 118; the second substrate can be a BOPP clear film of a gauge in the range of about 160 to 240; the first substrate can be a BOPP clear film of a gauge of about 200; and/or the non-adhesive edge of the second substrate can be a portion of the second substrate folded onto itself so that PSA surfaces are adjacent to one another.
In some embodiments, laminate for forming a closable flexible package can have a continuous web of flexible film having a longitudinal axis; a continuous label applied to the flexible film along the longitudinal axis with pressure sensitive adhesive; and the web and label forming a continuous series of similar package forming blanks, the flexible film of each blank having a line of weakness forming a flap in the film along the label to define an opening. In some embodiments, the score line can be continuous in the longitudinal direction along the web; arcuate; or sinusoidal. A portion of the label can be tack free to define a pull tab.
In some embodiments, a reclosable package can have a multi-layer laminate film, the laminate film having at least a sealant layer, a barrier layer, an adhesive layer, and a stiffening layer; a line of weakness formed in the multi-layer laminate film, the line of weakness defining at least in part a package opening; and a closure layer attached to the multi-layer laminate film with an adhesive and extending over the line of weakness.
In other embodiments, the laminate film can also have a polyester layer and an additional adhesive layer. In other embodiments, the laminate film further comprises a release layer. In still other embodiments, the stiffening layer can have a fiber substrate.
In other embodiments, a method for forming a reclosable flexible package laminate, can have the steps of providing a continuous web of flexible film having a longitudinal axis; applying a continuous label to the flexible film along the longitudinal axis with pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA); and scoring the web forming a continuous series of similar package forming blanks and forming a flap in the film along the label to define an opening. In other embodiments, the method can optionally add the step of applying a deadening label to the PSA forming a pull tab prior to the step of applying the continuous label to the flexible film. In other embodiments, the method can optionally add the step of removing a liner from the label to expose the PSA prior to the step of applying the continuous label to the flexible film. In other embodiments, the method can optionally add the step of scoring the label after the step of applying the continuous label to the flexible film; and removing the label score matrix. In other embodiments, the method can optionally add the step of folding the web over a product to create a folded edge; and forming a seal on the folded edge opposing free edges of the web to form front and back panels define an interior space to contain product. In other embodiments, the method can optionally add the step of cutting a seal to define an individual package.
In some embodiments, the apparatus to form a reclosable flexible film package can have a lamination roller to laminate a continuous web of flexible film having a longitudinal axis to a continuous label along the longitudinal axis with pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA); a first device to produce a line of weakness formed in the web after laminating the flexible film to the label, forming a continuous series of similar package forming blanks and forming a flap in the film along the label to define an opening; a folding device to create a folded edge over a product; and a sealing device to form a seal on the opposing free edges of the web folded edge to form front and back panels define an interior space to contain product. In other embodiments, the apparatus can optionally have a second scoring device to score the label after lamination to the web. In other embodiments, the apparatus can optionally have a cutting device to cut the seal to form an individual package.
In other embodiments, a package can be formed by a process having the steps of providing a film web; continuously applying a label web to the film web with adhesive; cutting the label web to form labels; removing the label web that does not form the labels from the film web; and forming lines of weakness in the film web corresponding to the labels to define package openings. The package can also be formed by separating the film web having the labels into package blanks: by wrapping the film web having the labels around a food product and forming individual flexible film packages; or by separating the film packages from one another. In some embodiments, the labels can each have a first portion including a pull tab, the first portion being disposed beyond the lines of weakness toward the pull tab. Optionally, the first portion of the shaped package labels further can have a reseal portion with pressure sensitive adhesive. In some embodiments, the labels can also have a second portion disposed beyond the lines of weakness away from the pull tab. In other embodiments, the second portion of the labels can include a pair of tabs. In some embodiments, the package can be formed with the additional step of folding the film web around a food product wherein the package can include a package fold and the pair of tabs of the second portion of the labels extend around the package fold.
In other embodiments, a method of forming a series of reclosable film packages can include the steps of providing a film web; continuously applying a label web to the flexible film web with adhesive; cutting the label web to form package labels removing the label web that does not form the labels; and forming lines of weakness in the film web corresponding to the labels to define package openings.
Provided herein are various embodiments of an easily opened and reclosable package having in some embodiments a front and back panel formed by a flexible film web substrate having a closure layer or label substrate disposed thereon. The label can be applied continuously to the film. In some embodiments the label can be top cut to form a shaped continuous label or even a discrete label package from a continuously applied label. The reclosable packages can be easily opened and reclosed while maintaining package integrity. By one approach, the reclosable packages are formed with a flexible film laminated with a continuous label by a pressure sensitive adhesive. In one configuration, an illustrative four-sided package is comprised of a folded web of flexible film that forms the front and back panels having four peripheral edges—one folded edge and three sealed edges.
In such a configuration, no fin or lap seals are needed. By one approach, the label can extend beyond one panel of the reclosable package and may extend on both sides of a film peripheral edge (e.g., the edge seal or the fold line). In one aspect, the label extends beyond a preconfigured score line (i.e., a tear line or line of weakness) formed in the web on a first edge. It is noted that a line of weakness can include any effort to compromise film integrity which may include a complete separation of the film (e.g.,
On a surface of the continuous label facing the flexible film web, the continuous label may have an adhesive-free area (e.g., along all or a portion of the first edge) to provide a pull tab to facilitate easy opening of the package. Further, such adhesive-free pull tab may be disposed on a side of the package with the score line such that the adhesive-free pull tab is disposed proximate the package opening or flap. The adhesive-free pull tab may be formed by creating a deadened area of the PSA. In one approach, the PSA is deadened on a portion of the surface of the continuous label by folding the over a portion of the label. A second edge of the label can extend over a peripheral edge to a portion of an adjacent panel (e.g., the back panel). It is noted though that in other configurations more than two panels may be present, such as a box having six panels. In this instance the adjacent panel over which the label extends may be a top, side or bottom panel.
Although the present embodiments are described for a label laminated over a score line of a flexible web, several variations are provided within the scope of these embodiments. For example, as described herein, the package can be configured to ‘reclose’ for product containment after initial opening. It is noted that in some embodiments, the reclose feature can also ‘reseal’ the package. In other words, the package can be hermetically resealed (or near to hermetically sealed) to maintain product freshness and/or protect against moisture loss. This reseal feature can be beneficial for package embodiments that can have an initial seal against ambient atmosphere (e.g., provide a gas and moisture barrier). A reseal feature can extend the time of product freshness.
It is further noted that the present embodiments can be applied to a variety of package designs using a variety of package materials. For example, a four-sided package is described, though the package can be round, oval, or have any number of sides, side seals, folded edges, shapes, and combinations thereof. Also, a two-paneled package is described, though the package can include a multiplicity of panels (such as a box), round sleeves (such as for a round sleeve of crackers), and the like. Package materials can include various polymer laminate films described herein, as well as, paper, paperboard, paper poly-foil laminate, coated polymers, coated paper (e.g., wax paper), and the like, and combinations thereof. Although the present embodiments are described for food product and chewing gum applications, the embodiments can equally be applied to non-food applications such as, medical, pharmaceutical, industrial package applications.
Turning now to the Figures, there is shown in
The illustrated flexible flow-wrap embodiments described herein generally include a package designed for multiple servings, formed from a scored flexible material having two (2) side seals and an end seal which form front panel 64 and back panel 66. The seals, which can be hermetic (or substantially hermetic) seals and can be formed by processes of hot seal, cold seal, sonic waves, low tack seal, and combinations thereof, and are preferably non-peelable. Embodiments can provide not only a light barrier, but can also be configured to provide a gas and moisture barrier for up to 24 months prior to opening. In some embodiments, such as for chewing gum, the package can be configured to maintain product freshness from between six to 18 months. Given the flexibility of the laminate film, package shape is typically influenced by the product contents.
Package 20 can be formed by joining opposite sides of the film 22 to form end seal 28. In one approach, the package can be formed by a film label laminate to allow for parallel formation of packages in multiple lanes (e.g., two lanes shown in
Alternate package embodiments can be found in
In
As used herein, continuous application of the label, flexible film, or adhesives indicates that the application of these is uninterrupted along the direction of application. Further, as used herein, a continuous package label may extend the entire length or width of the package and is uninterrupted from one edge of the package to an opposing edge. Alternatively, a discrete package label is one that covers only a portion of the width and length of the package and does not extend across the entire width or length of the package. By one approach, a continuous label web may be continuously applied to a film web, which is then formed into packages having a continuous package label. By another approach, a discrete package label may be applied in a continuous application such that a continuous label web is applied to a film web. In such a configuration, a label cut, such as a top cut, may be formed in the continuously applied label web. The label cut may define a shaped package label and the portion of the continuously applied label that does not form the shaped package label (i.e., the unused label matrix) may be removed from the flexible film web. Thus, a portion of the continuously applied label web may be removed from the film web to thereby form discrete package labels disposed on the film web.
In the present embodiments, film 22 can be formed from a variety of materials and laminations. Film 22 may be a laminate with several layers such as a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) layer and an oriented polypropylene (OPP) layer, or optionally be a single layer polymer. Examples of a single layer polymer can include polypropylene, polyethylene, polylactic acid (PLA), polyester, and the like. A PET layer can be flexible to semi-rigid, depending on its thickness. PET may be employed because it is very lightweight, strong, and can have high transparency when desired for package specifications. It can also be useful as an oxygen (gas) and moisture barrier. An OPP layer can add further strength and be a further barrier to permeability. Lamination components can be joined by adhesives or by extruded polymers. Film 22 can be a flexible sheet material rolled or formed as a blank and made of laminated or co-extruded film structures. Generally film 22 can be in the range of about 30 to 500 gauge. In embodiments using a polyester film, the film should be at least 48 gauge.
Film thickness can also be a function of the desired barrier to gas, moisture, and light, level of desired structural integrity, and the desired depth of the score line (described below). Further, film gauge (and label gauge) can be selected based on the desired package rigidity. In embodiments where the label extends beyond a fold line to a back panel, the label can provide further package rigidity.
Film 22 can be a heat sealable copolymer. In some embodiments, the heat sealable polymer forms a seal between 50 and 300 degrees Celsius. Film 22 can also be a pressure sealing film. In some embodiments, this pressure sealing film forms a seal between a pressure of about 0.7 and 7.0 Kg/cm, and preferably at about 5.6 Kg/cm.
Film 22 can optionally also have additional laminate layers. An optional sealant layer (See seal 26,
Stiffeners can be added to film 22 compositions, such as a polyamide polymer (e.g., nylon) and fibrous compositions such as paper. The stiffeners can be added as a component of the extruded film or as a separate layer. Nylon can be added as a laminate layer held to the film structure by an adhesive, optionally with film attached on each side of the nylon (i.e., tie layer). For illustrative purposes, the nylon layer can be about 8 percent of the film thickness or about 0.004 mm.
Optional film layers can also include ink layers (not shown). For example, one specific laminate can include ink and a primer disposed between a PET and OPP layer. Metalized layers, paper and paperboard layers, and various other combinations of laminates are also possible within the preferred embodiments.
As shown, film 22 can be shaped into a pouch or sleeve type package having square edges, though the embodiments can also be practiced in various curvilinear shapes such as rectilinear (sleeves) or oval packages depending on the desired product contained therein.
Turning now to
One laminate embodiment can be as follows: about 48 gauge PET/ink/about 70 gauge LDPE (or about 10 pounds)/about 70 gauge MET OPP. LDPE is a low density polyethylene. Other film lamination and label compositions are possible within the scope of these embodiments, so long as the package and label integrity can be maintained after repeated uses. For example, PET, LDPE and MET OPP components can each be in the range of about 5 to 500 gauge. Also, multiple variations of PET, PE, BOPP (bi-axially oriented polypropylene) and MET OPP are also contemplated for the configurations presented herein.
In an alternate embodiment, film configurations can include a printed overwrap film of about 48-230 gauge (preferably about 118 gauge) OPP Clear film that is reverse printed and adhesively bound to about a 48-230 gauge (preferably about 118 gauge) white OPP package film.
In another approach, as shown in
Beneath polyester layer 90 can be an optional adhesive layer 92 to bind an optional stiffening layer 91, such as a fiber substrate (e.g., paper or even paperboard layer). Stiffening layer 91 can be paper in the range of about 18 to 80 grams per square meter (gsm), but preferably in the range of about 35 gsm to about 45 gsm, and most preferably about 40 gsm. Adhesive layer 92 can optionally be an extrusion or olefin or the like. Beneath polyester layer 90 (or optional stiffening layer 91) a second adhesive layer 92 can be disposed or even polyolefin in embodiments using extrusion lamination. In the approach second adhesive layer 92 bonds layer 90 (or 91) to a barrier layer 93. Barrier layer 93 can be a foil in the range of about 12 to 40 gauge, though preferably about 29 gauge. Barrier layer 93 can also be a metalized oriented polypropylene (MET OPP) layer. Below foil layer 93, a sealant layer 94 can be applied, which can include a polyolefin. Sealant layer 94 allows binding of opposing film layers to form, for example the package's end and side seals.
The present embodiments can also provide a line of weakness in the film substrate to define a package flap (e.g.,
Scoring the film is not limited to a gauge of material or composition. Thus, the resulting product is cost effective. It is again noted that the term ‘score’ as used herein can be used to describe the effect of any type of process, such as by mechanical, laser or other processes that would provide a line of weakness to compromise the integrity of the film substrate. Score 38 can be cut through the exterior or interior surface of film 22, but preferably on the interior surface. It is also noted that the score need not be continuous to form a line of weakness. In some embodiments, a series of perforations of various sizes can be scored into film 22.
The preferred tear strength of score line 38 should be at least weaker than the adhesive strength of the PSA 32 (
Score line 38 can be arcuate as illustrated in
Some embodiments described above attempt to address a tendency that exposed score lines tend to propagate a continued tear beyond the end of the score line.
Some embodiments have a package integrity feature (PIF). For example,
The illustrated embodiments provide a label substrate 24 (continuous or discrete) laminated to film 22 by a PSA 32 (
Label 24 can be transparent (as shown), opaque or optionally printed. In a preferred embodiment, the applied label 24 can be a linerless label continuously applied longitudinally to the flow of the film. Thus, label liner waste can be eliminated and since the label is continuous, and the step of precise registration of the label on each unit of the product is not required. It is noted though that label 24 can be generally described as any film with an adhesive covering and be within the scope of the presented embodiments. It is also noted that labels with liners can also be used within the scope of the presented embodiments.
Linerless labels can be a face-stock for label 24, having a PSA coating on one side but can be rolled into a spool without a liner. This can be accomplished by a release coating applied to the side opposite the adhesive coating. Face-stocks can include standard paper, film, plastic, fabric, foil, direct thermal, and the like. Linerless labels are available with removable and repositionable adhesives. Alternatively an adhesive covered flexible film can be used for label 24.
As illustrated, label 24 can be applied to film 22 as a continuous label with a PSA. It is noted though that in alternate embodiments, the label can be a discretely applied label, a discrete label formed by top cutting a continuously applied layer, or provided as an interstitial layer to a laminated film.
In the present embodiments, label 24 can be laminated to film 22 by PSA 32. As stated above, peel strength between package 20 surface and label 24 should be greater than the force required to separate the film along the score line 38. As such, label 24 is peelable with respect to package 20 surface, including portions of label 24 exposed to the sealing process of side seals 26 (See below).
An exemplary label embodiment for package configurations described herein can be about 50 to 500 gauge and, preferably, about 100 to 250 gauge polyester or oriented polypropylene (OPP). Other types of semi-rigid polymer, such as PET, can also be used. OPP embodiments can include bi-axially oriented polypropylene (BOPP). The label can be opaque, but preferably clear. A specific embodiment can be about a 200 gauge (2 mil) BOPP clear film having about a 10-200 PSA coating (and preferably about 100 gauge (1 mil)) that can optionally be covered for shipping by about a 100 gauge (1 mil) polyester liner (greater than 18 gauge). The optional liner can be removed prior to being applied to the package film. Liner can also be used as the deadening agent for the adhesive free zone.
PET can be advantageous if thermal resistance in creating a non-peelable seal is desired. Preferably, PSA is applied directly to the film but can be applied to ink or any other coating on the film. The PSA should remain attached to the label 24, even after repeated openings and reclosures. PSA 32 is preferably neutral or non-reactive to the product and can be configured to provide a reclosable seal even in refrigerated conditions (i.e., the PSA is operable in a temperature range of about −10 to 90 degrees Celsius). Label 24 can be applied to cover score line 38, while leaving a sufficient marginal region of label 24 to expose enough PSA 36 to substantially reclose the package opening define by score line 38 (See e.g.,
Another approach to a label is shown as label 24i in
During assembly of the present embodiments, label 24 (closure layer) can be laminated to film 22. End seal 28 and side seals 26 can be formed as two film 22 edges are joined and sealed by heated wheels or seal jaws. As discussed above, a sealant layer can be applied to the film to facilitate the type of desired seal. This internal adhesive can be applied up to 100 percent of the interior surface or only where it is needed to provide a seal. The present embodiments do require an additional package fin or lap seal.
The method to assemble package 20 of the present embodiments can use heat seals, cold seals, extrusion and adhesive lamination, or co-extrusion. The label can be applied continuously along the longitudinal length of the flow film. When the products are enveloped and sealed within the flow film, the flow film/label laminate can be cut into individual packages.
One exemplary ‘in-line’ method of making one package embodiment is generally shown in
As shown, film 22 and label 24 (transparent for this illustration) are joined from their respective feed rolls at 62. It is noted though that the label may be pre-applied to the film to be processed as a single feed roll. The film/label laminate could look like the blank feed 40 illustrated in
After the film/label lamination, film 12 can be scored at 50 on the film surface directed to the interior of the package, though the top surface could also be scored. Preferably, scoring occurs after the continuous label is applied but could be applied prior to lamination or even supplied on the feed roll. As described above, score 38 can be formed by laser, mechanical means, such as a knife, and the like.
Once scored, the film is folded around product and the edges are sealed at folding device 78. As illustrated in
As shown in the illustration of
An exemplary ‘off-line’ lamination process to develop a dual lane package scored film/label laminate is shown in
Further, the label can optionally be scored or cut. This label cut may extend completely or nearly completely through the thickness of the label.
The pull tab or tack free gripping portion may be formed in a number of additional manners. For example, instead of a second, deadening label 27, a coating or other adhesive deadening means, such as an ink coating or heat inactivation, can be applied to select areas of the adhesive side of label by adhesive deactivating device 330. Further, such adhesive deactivation may be done in a pattern-applied approach and, indeed, the adhesive application may also be pattern-applied. The adhesive deactivating process can also include an adhesive coating applicator 338, which can be positioned anywhere along the line before being laminated to film 22 at nip rollers 320. Adhesive coating applicator 338 can apply adhesive in either a machine direction or even zone applied, such as in a transverse direction. In the instance of a zone application of an adhesive, the adhesive coating step can be eliminated since the adhesive would only be applied as configured. Accordingly, neither deadening label 27, nor adhesive deadening device 330 would be needed if the adhesive on label 24 is pattern applied so as to have a portion free of adhesive.
In another approach, film roll 318 can be pulled from an unwinding station 336. Materials that feed from unwinding station 336 may optionally include film printing on film 318 top surface and even reverse printing on film bottom surface. Printing can be by flexographic, lithography and rotogravure. Unwind station 336 can include film laminations, application of adhesives, extrusions, heat lamination, and the like. The film/web structure from role 318 can include mono to multi film layers.
In another approach, the film/label lamination device shown in
In yet another approach, a slitting station 334 can be added to reduce label stack faces or to cut the label into multiple lanes.
Accordingly, there are many potential approaches that can be embodied either ‘off-line’ (e.g.,
For example,
Accordingly, in use of the configuration of the embodiment of
While preferred embodiments have been described in detail, variations and modifications can be effected within the configurations described herein.
This application is a U.S. National Phase application filed under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application PCT/US2012/029486, filed Mar. 16, 2012, designating the United States, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/453,872, filed Mar. 17, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/029486 | 3/16/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/27/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/125945 | 9/20/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
401974 | Smith | Apr 1889 | A |
811092 | Roberts | Jan 1906 | A |
1065012 | Watanabe | Jun 1913 | A |
1106721 | Lewis | Aug 1914 | A |
1171462 | Rice | Feb 1916 | A |
1791352 | Pascual | Feb 1931 | A |
1915503 | Schmidt | Jun 1933 | A |
1949161 | Haug | Feb 1934 | A |
1963639 | Ahlquist | Jun 1934 | A |
1978035 | Thom | Oct 1934 | A |
2033550 | Rosen | Mar 1936 | A |
2034007 | Smith | Mar 1936 | A |
2066495 | Swift | Jan 1937 | A |
2079328 | McBean | May 1937 | A |
2128196 | Max | Aug 1938 | A |
2248578 | Moore | Jul 1941 | A |
2260064 | Stokes | Oct 1941 | A |
2320143 | Johnson | May 1943 | A |
2321042 | Preis | Jun 1943 | A |
2330015 | Stokes | Sep 1943 | A |
2475236 | Matthew | Jul 1949 | A |
2554160 | Von | May 1951 | A |
2588409 | Olsen | Mar 1952 | A |
2605897 | Rundle | Aug 1952 | A |
2621788 | Hitchcock | Dec 1952 | A |
2684807 | Gerrish | Jul 1954 | A |
2719647 | Freeman | Oct 1955 | A |
2823795 | Moore | Feb 1958 | A |
2965224 | Harwood | Dec 1960 | A |
3080238 | Howard | Mar 1963 | A |
3127273 | Monahan | Mar 1964 | A |
3179326 | Underwood | Apr 1965 | A |
3186628 | Rohde | Jun 1965 | A |
3187982 | Underwood | Jun 1965 | A |
3217871 | Lee | Nov 1965 | A |
3235165 | Jackson | Feb 1966 | A |
3259303 | Repko | Jul 1966 | A |
3260358 | Gottily | Jul 1966 | A |
3272422 | Miller | Sep 1966 | A |
3291377 | Eggen | Dec 1966 | A |
3298505 | Stephenson | Jan 1967 | A |
3311032 | Lucas | Mar 1967 | A |
3326450 | Langdon | Jun 1967 | A |
3331501 | Stewart | Jul 1967 | A |
3343541 | Bellamy | Sep 1967 | A |
3373922 | Watts | Mar 1968 | A |
3373926 | Voigtman | Mar 1968 | A |
3454210 | Spiegel | Jul 1969 | A |
3471005 | Sexstone | Oct 1969 | A |
3528825 | Doughty | Sep 1970 | A |
3570751 | Trewella | Mar 1971 | A |
3595466 | Rosenburg | Jul 1971 | A |
3595468 | Repko | Jul 1971 | A |
3618751 | Rich | Nov 1971 | A |
3630346 | Burnside | Dec 1971 | A |
3651615 | Bohner | Mar 1972 | A |
3653502 | Beaudoin | Apr 1972 | A |
3685720 | Brady | Aug 1972 | A |
3687352 | Kalajian | Aug 1972 | A |
3740238 | Graham | Jun 1973 | A |
3757078 | Conti | Sep 1973 | A |
3790744 | Bowen | Feb 1974 | A |
3811564 | Braber | May 1974 | A |
3865302 | Kane | Feb 1975 | A |
3885727 | Gilley | May 1975 | A |
3905646 | Brackmann | Sep 1975 | A |
3909582 | Bowen | Sep 1975 | A |
3910410 | Shaw | Oct 1975 | A |
3938659 | Wardwell | Feb 1976 | A |
3966046 | Deutschlander | Jun 1976 | A |
3971506 | Roenna | Jul 1976 | A |
3979050 | Cilia | Sep 1976 | A |
4082216 | Clarke | Apr 1978 | A |
4113104 | Meyers | Sep 1978 | A |
4140046 | Marbach | Feb 1979 | A |
4143695 | Hoehn | Mar 1979 | A |
4156493 | Julius | May 1979 | A |
4185754 | Julius | Jan 1980 | A |
4192420 | Worrell et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4192448 | Porth | Mar 1980 | A |
4197949 | Carlsson | Apr 1980 | A |
4210246 | Kuchenbecker | Jul 1980 | A |
4258876 | Ljungcrantz | Mar 1981 | A |
4260061 | Jacobs | Apr 1981 | A |
4273815 | Gifford | Jun 1981 | A |
4285681 | Walitalo | Aug 1981 | A |
4306367 | Otto | Dec 1981 | A |
4337862 | Suter | Jul 1982 | A |
4364478 | Tuens | Dec 1982 | A |
4397415 | Lisiecki | Aug 1983 | A |
4411365 | Horikawa | Oct 1983 | A |
4420080 | Nakamura | Dec 1983 | A |
4428477 | Cristofolo | Jan 1984 | A |
4460088 | Rugenstein | Jul 1984 | A |
4464154 | Ljungcrantz | Aug 1984 | A |
4488647 | Davis | Dec 1984 | A |
4506488 | Matt et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4518087 | Goglio | May 1985 | A |
4538396 | Nakamura | Sep 1985 | A |
4545844 | Buchanan | Oct 1985 | A |
4548824 | Mitchell | Oct 1985 | A |
4548852 | Mitchell | Oct 1985 | A |
4549063 | Ang | Oct 1985 | A |
4550831 | Whitford | Nov 1985 | A |
4552269 | Chang | Nov 1985 | A |
4557505 | Schaefer | Dec 1985 | A |
4570820 | Murphy | Feb 1986 | A |
4572377 | Beckett | Feb 1986 | A |
4589943 | Kimball | May 1986 | A |
4608288 | Spindler | Aug 1986 | A |
4610357 | Nakamura | Sep 1986 | A |
4613046 | Kuchenbecker | Sep 1986 | A |
4616470 | Nakamura | Oct 1986 | A |
4625495 | Holovach | Dec 1986 | A |
4632299 | Holmberg | Dec 1986 | A |
4638911 | Prohaska | Jan 1987 | A |
4648509 | Alves | Mar 1987 | A |
4651874 | Nakamura | Mar 1987 | A |
4653250 | Nakamura | Mar 1987 | A |
4658963 | Jud | Apr 1987 | A |
4667453 | Goglio | May 1987 | A |
4671453 | Cassidy | Jun 1987 | A |
4673085 | Badouard | Jun 1987 | A |
4679693 | Forman | Jul 1987 | A |
4694960 | Phipps | Sep 1987 | A |
4696404 | Corella | Sep 1987 | A |
4709399 | Sanders | Nov 1987 | A |
4723301 | Chang | Feb 1988 | A |
4738365 | Prater | Apr 1988 | A |
4739879 | Nakamura | Apr 1988 | A |
4770325 | Gordon | Sep 1988 | A |
4784885 | Carespodi | Nov 1988 | A |
4786355 | Kontz | Nov 1988 | A |
4790436 | Nakamura | Dec 1988 | A |
4798295 | Rausing | Jan 1989 | A |
4798296 | Lagerstedt | Jan 1989 | A |
4799594 | Blackman | Jan 1989 | A |
4811848 | Jud | Mar 1989 | A |
4818120 | Addiego | Apr 1989 | A |
4838429 | Fabisiewicz | Jun 1989 | A |
4840270 | Caputo | Jun 1989 | A |
4845470 | Boldt | Jul 1989 | A |
4848575 | Nakamura | Jul 1989 | A |
4858780 | Odaka et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4863064 | Dailey | Sep 1989 | A |
4865198 | Butler | Sep 1989 | A |
4866911 | Grindrod | Sep 1989 | A |
4874096 | Tessera-Chiesa | Oct 1989 | A |
4876123 | Rivera | Oct 1989 | A |
4889731 | Williams | Dec 1989 | A |
4901505 | Williams, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4902142 | Lammert | Feb 1990 | A |
4917247 | Jud | Apr 1990 | A |
4943439 | Andreas | Jul 1990 | A |
4972953 | Friedman | Nov 1990 | A |
4998666 | Ewan | Mar 1991 | A |
4999081 | Buchanan | Mar 1991 | A |
5000320 | Kuchenbecker | Mar 1991 | A |
5001325 | Huizinga | Mar 1991 | A |
5005264 | Breen | Apr 1991 | A |
5010231 | Huizinga | Apr 1991 | A |
5018625 | Focke | May 1991 | A |
5029712 | O'Brien | Jul 1991 | A |
5040685 | Focke | Aug 1991 | A |
5046621 | Bell | Sep 1991 | A |
5048718 | Nakamura | Sep 1991 | A |
5054619 | Muckenfuhs | Oct 1991 | A |
5060848 | Ewan | Oct 1991 | A |
5065868 | Cornelissen | Nov 1991 | A |
5076439 | Kuchenbecker | Dec 1991 | A |
5077064 | Hustad | Dec 1991 | A |
5078509 | Center | Jan 1992 | A |
5082702 | Alband | Jan 1992 | A |
5085724 | Focke | Feb 1992 | A |
5096113 | Focke | Mar 1992 | A |
5100003 | Jud | Mar 1992 | A |
5103980 | Kuchenbecker | Apr 1992 | A |
5108669 | van Dijk et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5124388 | Pruett | Jun 1992 | A |
5125211 | OBrien | Jun 1992 | A |
5134001 | Osgood | Jul 1992 | A |
5158499 | Guckenberger | Oct 1992 | A |
5161350 | Nakamura | Nov 1992 | A |
5167455 | Forman | Dec 1992 | A |
5167974 | Grindrod | Dec 1992 | A |
5174659 | Laske | Dec 1992 | A |
5184771 | Jud | Feb 1993 | A |
5190152 | Smith | Mar 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5222422 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
5222813 | Kopp | Jun 1993 | A |
5229180 | Littmann | Jul 1993 | A |
5294470 | Ewan | Mar 1994 | A |
5307988 | Focke | May 1994 | A |
5310262 | Robison | May 1994 | A |
5333735 | Focke | Aug 1994 | A |
5344007 | Nakamura | Sep 1994 | A |
5352466 | Delonis | Oct 1994 | A |
5356068 | Moreno | Oct 1994 | A |
5366087 | Bane | Nov 1994 | A |
5371997 | Kopp | Dec 1994 | A |
5374179 | Swanson | Dec 1994 | A |
5375698 | Ewart | Dec 1994 | A |
5381643 | Kazaitis | Jan 1995 | A |
5382190 | Graves | Jan 1995 | A |
5388757 | Lorenzen | Feb 1995 | A |
5405629 | Marnocha | Apr 1995 | A |
5407070 | Bascos | Apr 1995 | A |
5409115 | Barkhorn | Apr 1995 | A |
5409116 | Aronsen | Apr 1995 | A |
5439102 | Brown | Aug 1995 | A |
5454207 | Storandt | Oct 1995 | A |
5460838 | Wermund | Oct 1995 | A |
5460844 | Gaylor | Oct 1995 | A |
5461845 | Yeager | Oct 1995 | A |
5464092 | Seeley | Nov 1995 | A |
5470015 | Jud | Nov 1995 | A |
5489060 | Godard | Feb 1996 | A |
5499757 | Back | Mar 1996 | A |
5503858 | Reskow | Apr 1996 | A |
5505305 | Scholz | Apr 1996 | A |
5515965 | Boldrini | May 1996 | A |
5519982 | Herber | May 1996 | A |
5520939 | Wells | May 1996 | A |
5524759 | Herzberg | Jun 1996 | A |
5531325 | Deflander | Jul 1996 | A |
5538129 | Chester | Jul 1996 | A |
5550346 | Andriash | Aug 1996 | A |
5558438 | Warr | Sep 1996 | A |
5582342 | Jud | Dec 1996 | A |
5582853 | Marnocha | Dec 1996 | A |
5582887 | Etheredge | Dec 1996 | A |
5591468 | Stockley | Jan 1997 | A |
5630308 | Guckenberger | May 1997 | A |
5633058 | Hoffer | May 1997 | A |
5636732 | Gilels | Jun 1997 | A |
5637369 | Stewart | Jun 1997 | A |
5647100 | Porchia | Jul 1997 | A |
5647506 | Julius | Jul 1997 | A |
5664677 | OConnor | Sep 1997 | A |
5672224 | Kaufmann | Sep 1997 | A |
5688394 | McBride | Nov 1997 | A |
5688463 | Robichaud | Nov 1997 | A |
5702743 | Wells | Dec 1997 | A |
5709479 | Bell | Jan 1998 | A |
5725311 | Ponsi | Mar 1998 | A |
D394204 | Seddon | May 1998 | S |
D394605 | Skiba | May 1998 | S |
5749657 | May | May 1998 | A |
5770283 | Gosselin | Jun 1998 | A |
5791465 | Niki | Aug 1998 | A |
5795604 | Wells | Aug 1998 | A |
5819931 | Boucher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820953 | Beer | Oct 1998 | A |
5833368 | Kaufman | Nov 1998 | A |
5855435 | Chiesa | Jan 1999 | A |
5862101 | Haas | Jan 1999 | A |
5873483 | Goertz | Feb 1999 | A |
5873607 | Waggoner | Feb 1999 | A |
5882116 | Backus | Mar 1999 | A |
5885673 | Light | Mar 1999 | A |
5906278 | Ponsi | May 1999 | A |
5908246 | Arimura | Jun 1999 | A |
5928749 | Forman | Jul 1999 | A |
5938013 | Palumbo | Aug 1999 | A |
5939156 | Rossi | Aug 1999 | A |
5945145 | Narsutis | Aug 1999 | A |
5956794 | Skiba | Sep 1999 | A |
5993962 | Timm | Nov 1999 | A |
5996797 | Flaig | Dec 1999 | A |
5997177 | Kaufman | Dec 1999 | A |
6006907 | Sato | Dec 1999 | A |
6012572 | Heathcock et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015934 | Lee | Jan 2000 | A |
6026953 | Nakamura | Feb 2000 | A |
6028289 | Robichaud | Feb 2000 | A |
6029809 | Skiba | Feb 2000 | A |
6056141 | Navarini et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060095 | Scrimager | May 2000 | A |
6065591 | Dill | May 2000 | A |
6066437 | Kosslinger | May 2000 | A |
6076969 | Jaisle | Jun 2000 | A |
6077551 | Scrimager | Jun 2000 | A |
6099682 | Krampe | Aug 2000 | A |
6113271 | Scott | Sep 2000 | A |
6125614 | Jones | Oct 2000 | A |
6126009 | Shiffler | Oct 2000 | A |
6126317 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
6152601 | Johnson | Nov 2000 | A |
6164441 | Guy | Dec 2000 | A |
6213645 | Beer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228450 | Pedrini | May 2001 | B1 |
D447054 | Hill | Aug 2001 | S |
6273610 | Koyama | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279297 | Latronico | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296884 | Okerlund | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299355 | Schneck | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309104 | Koch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309105 | Palumbo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318894 | Derenthal | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325877 | Murphy | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352364 | Mobs | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364113 | Faasse | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6365255 | Kittel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383592 | Lowry | May 2002 | B1 |
6402379 | Albright | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420006 | Scott | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427420 | Olivieri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428208 | Addison | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428867 | Scott | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446811 | Wilfong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450685 | Scott | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457585 | Huffer | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461043 | Healy | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461708 | Dronzek | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471817 | Emmert | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476743 | Brown | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482867 | Kimura | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502986 | Bensur | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517243 | Huffer | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519918 | Forman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6539691 | Beer | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554134 | Guibert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563082 | Terada | May 2003 | B2 |
6589622 | Scott | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592260 | Randall | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594872 | Cisek | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616334 | Faaborg | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621046 | Kaji | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6669046 | Sawada | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691886 | Berndt | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698928 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726054 | Fagen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726364 | Perell | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746743 | Knoerzer | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750423 | Tanaka | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767604 | Muir | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6815634 | Sonoda | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852947 | Tanaka | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865860 | Arakawa | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889483 | Compton | May 2005 | B2 |
6918532 | Sierra-Gomez | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929400 | Razeti | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932135 | Tabuchi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945400 | Bolnick | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951999 | Monforton | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969196 | Woodham | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983875 | Emmott | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007423 | Andersson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018502 | Treleaven | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021827 | Compton | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032754 | Kopecky | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032757 | Richards | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032810 | Benedetti et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040810 | Steele | May 2006 | B2 |
7048441 | Pape | May 2006 | B2 |
7051877 | Lin | May 2006 | B2 |
7165888 | Rodick | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172779 | Castellanos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207718 | Machacek | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207719 | Marbler | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213710 | Cotert | May 2007 | B2 |
7228968 | Burgess | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7254873 | Stolmeier | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261468 | Schneider | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262335 | Motsch | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7302783 | Cotert | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7350688 | Sierra-Gomez | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7351458 | Leighton | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7352591 | Sugahara | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404487 | Kumakura | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416768 | Knoerzer | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422142 | Arippol | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7470062 | Moteki | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475781 | Kobayashi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7516599 | Doll | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527189 | Billig | May 2009 | B2 |
7533773 | Aldridge | May 2009 | B2 |
7600641 | Burgess | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7703602 | Saito | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708463 | Sampaio Camacho | May 2010 | B2 |
7717620 | Hebert et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740923 | Exner | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758484 | Peterson | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7858901 | Krishnan | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7971718 | Aldridge | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002171 | Ryan | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002941 | Exner | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029428 | Selle | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038349 | Andersson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8181784 | Bouthiette | May 2012 | B2 |
8240546 | Friebe | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262830 | Hebert et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262832 | Hebert et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273434 | Zietlow | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8506165 | Shinozaki | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8540839 | Zietlow | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544519 | Ikeda | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8607980 | Aldridge et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8763890 | Clark | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8920030 | McSweeney | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8951591 | Vogt | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8986803 | Yoshida | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8999100 | Carmichael | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20010000480 | Stagg | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020000441 | Redmond | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020068668 | Chow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030019780 | Parodi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039412 | Rodick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047695 | Zik | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051440 | Chow | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053720 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030118255 | Miller | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127352 | Buschkiel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030170357 | Garwood | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183637 | Zappa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030183643 | Fagen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210838 | Steele | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217946 | Hsu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223656 | Razeti | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040011677 | Arakawa | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035719 | Ebbers | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060974 | Dacey | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062838 | Castellanos | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040067326 | Knoerzer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083680 | Compton | May 2004 | A1 |
20040091184 | Miller | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112010 | Richards | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112771 | Bailey | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040150221 | Brown | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175060 | Woodham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180118 | Renger | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206637 | Sierra-Gomez | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050000965 | Boardman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031233 | Varanese et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050084186 | Caris | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050116016 | Lo Duca | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050117819 | Kingsford | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050220371 | Machacek | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247764 | Sierra-Gomez | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276885 | Bennett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018569 | Bonenfant | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060066096 | Kan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060124494 | Clark | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144911 | Sierra-Gomez | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171611 | Rapparini | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199717 | Marbler | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060251342 | Forman | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257056 | Miyake | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257599 | Exner | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283750 | Villars et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285779 | Golas | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070023435 | Sierra-Gomez | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070023436 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070095709 | Saito et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116388 | Kuge | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140600 | Nowak | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070209959 | Burgess | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070269142 | Tyska | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275133 | Sierra-Gomez | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080013869 | Forman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031555 | Roberts | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034713 | Kohl | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037911 | Cole et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041750 | Kohlweyer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053861 | Mellin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060751 | Arrindell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063324 | Bernard | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063759 | Raymond | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063760 | Raymond | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101733 | Fenn-Barrabass | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131035 | Rogers | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135428 | Tallier | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152264 | Pokusa | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156861 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159666 | Exner | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199109 | Rutzinger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203141 | Friebe | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214376 | Bonenfant | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220227 | Keeney | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240627 | Cole et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273821 | Doll | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292225 | Dayrit | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001143 | Cowan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014491 | Fuisz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022431 | Conner | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028472 | Andersson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053372 | Hambrick | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074333 | Griebel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097786 | Goglio | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090161995 | Henderson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090190866 | Hughes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211938 | Aldridge | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226117 | Davis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232425 | Tai | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273179 | Scott | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090301903 | Andersson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002963 | Holbert | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018974 | Lyzenga | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019022 | Ryan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100111453 | Dierl | May 2010 | A1 |
20100147724 | Mitra-Shah | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172604 | Andersson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100226598 | Stoeppelmann | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230303 | Buse | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230411 | Sierra-Gomez | Sep 2010 | A9 |
20100278454 | Huffer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303391 | Cole | Dec 2010 | A9 |
20110049158 | Bouthiette | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058755 | Guibert | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110127319 | Golden | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132976 | Drewnowski | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147443 | Igo | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110204056 | Veternik et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110253718 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120125932 | Sierra-Gomez | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128835 | Lyzenga et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120177307 | Duan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130004626 | Renders et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011527 | Renders et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064477 | Vogt et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130064934 | Vogt | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130114918 | Lyzenga et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121623 | Lyzenga | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121624 | Lyzenga | May 2013 | A1 |
20130205964 | Matsushita | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130270268 | Lyzenga | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140185965 | Lyzenga | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140270597 | Friedman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140314339 | Docherty | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150016756 | Down | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021219 | SeyfferthDeOliveira | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
768679 | Jun 2001 | AU |
55008852 | Nov 2001 | BR |
62020307 | Apr 2003 | BR |
68046367 | Oct 2009 | BR |
1224396 | Jul 1999 | CN |
1781819 | Jun 2006 | CN |
1848870 | Mar 1962 | DE |
3700988 | Jul 1988 | DE |
3835721 | May 1990 | DE |
3835721 | May 1990 | DE |
9003401 | May 1990 | DE |
9005297 | Aug 1990 | DE |
9014065 | Feb 1991 | DE |
4134567 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4241423 | Jun 1994 | DE |
19738411 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19822328 | Nov 1999 | DE |
202004012301 | Dec 2004 | DE |
20122333 | Mar 2005 | DE |
202007005487 | Jun 2007 | DE |
102007030267 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102010019867 | Sep 2011 | DE |
0085289 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0307924 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0388310 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0408831 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0447636 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0474981 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0488967 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0546369 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0608909 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0613824 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0629561 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0661154 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0669204 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0744357 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0752375 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0758993 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0796208 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0905048 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1046594 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1056066 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1086906 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1136379 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1288139 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1318081 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1350741 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1375380 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1382543 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1437311 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1449789 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1457424 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1467929 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1468936 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1477425 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1488936 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1608567 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1609737 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1619137 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1637472 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1351861 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1712468 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1712488 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1755980 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1760006 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1770025 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1846306 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1858776 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1873082 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1908696 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1939107 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1975081 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2033910 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2189506 | May 2010 | EP |
1327914 | May 1963 | FR |
2674509 | Oct 1992 | FR |
2693988 | Jan 1994 | FR |
2766794 | Feb 1999 | FR |
2772009 | Jun 1999 | FR |
2783512 | Mar 2000 | FR |
1107200 | Mar 1968 | GB |
2171077 | Aug 1986 | GB |
2266513 | Nov 1993 | GB |
2276095 | Sep 1994 | GB |
2335652 | Sep 1999 | GB |
2339187 | Jan 2000 | GB |
2339187 | Jan 2000 | GB |
57163658 | Oct 1982 | JP |
S5822411 | May 1983 | JP |
6080405 | May 1985 | JP |
62171479 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63022370 | Jan 1988 | JP |
01167084 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01226579 | Sep 1989 | JP |
01267182 | Oct 1989 | JP |
H11343468 | Dec 1990 | JP |
H0581083 | Nov 1993 | JP |
09142551 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9150872 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09156677 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10059441 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10129685 | May 1998 | JP |
10167355 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H10152179 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H10509406 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10120016 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H0444968 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11198977 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000335542 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001114357 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001301807 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002002805 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002104550 | Apr 2002 | JP |
200326224 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003072774 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003137314 | May 2003 | JP |
2005015015 | Jan 2005 | JP |
200602767 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006062712 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006137445 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006199343 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007045434 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008105751 | May 2008 | JP |
2009166870 | Jul 2009 | JP |
8606350 | Nov 1986 | WO |
9104920 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9104920 | Apr 1991 | WO |
9411270 | May 1994 | WO |
9424019 | Oct 1994 | WO |
9532902 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9725200 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 0061458 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0064755 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0140073 | Jun 2001 | WO |
02064365 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02066341 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03013976 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03035504 | May 2003 | WO |
03037727 | May 2003 | WO |
03059776 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004087527 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005054079 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005056420 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005110042 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005110865 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005110876 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005110885 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005120989 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005123535 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006055128 | May 2006 | WO |
2006080405 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006108614 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007079071 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007090419 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008051813 | May 2008 | WO |
2008062159 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008051813 | May 2008 | WO |
2008074060 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008108969 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008115693 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008115693 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008122961 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008146142 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009065120 | May 2009 | WO |
2009111153 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010002834 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010046623 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010080810 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010084336 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010088492 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010114879 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010149996 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011004156 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011032064 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011121337 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011123410 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012036765 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012098412 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of EP 1449789 description. Translated on Jun. 13, 2015. |
Machine translation of the description of DE 38 35 721. |
Machine translation of the description of JP 10167355 A. |
Machine translation of CN 1781819A published Jun. 7, 2006 from google.com/patents; 13 pages, accessed Jun. 5, 2014. |
‘Cheese Range’, Mintel gnpd, Jan. 26, 2001, Mintel Publishing, 1 page. |
‘Elite Edam Cheese’, Mintel gnpd, Dec. 3, 2001, Mintel Publishing, 2 pages. |
‘Margin.’ Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2010. Merriam-Webster [online], retrieved on May 6, 2010, Retrieved from the internet:URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/margin, 3 pages. |
‘New Easy Peel Cheese Packaging’, Mintel gnpd, Aug. 10, 2001, Mintel Publishing. |
‘New on the Shelf-Product Instructions and Packaging Trends’, Circle Reader Service Card No. 93, Aug. 1998, Baking & Snack. |
‘Soft Bread Sticks’, Mintel gnpd, Mar. 20, 1998, Mintel Publishing, 1 page. |
“Wall's Bacon” A Sizzling Success Story and The Grocer: “When sealed delivers”, the second page of which bears a date of Aug. 21, 1999. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-1, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 55 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-2, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 35 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-3, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 34 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-4, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 35 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-1, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 135 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-2, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 64 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-3, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 140 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-4, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 273 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-5, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 146 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit B-6, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 226 pages. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to LPR 3.1, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 22 pages. |
Defendants' Final Unenforceability Contentions Pursuant to LPR 3.1, dated Sep. 27, 2013, 14 pages. |
Defendants' Initial Non-Infringement Contentions Pursuant to LPR 2.3(a), dated May 17, 2013, 7 pages. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-1, dated May 17, 2013, 55 pages. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-2, dated May 17, 2013, 35 pages. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-3, dated May 17, 2013, 34 pages. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-4, dated May 17, 2013, 35 pages. |
Defendants' invalidity Contentions—Exhibit A-5, dated May 17, 2013, 39 pages. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to LPR 2.3, dated May 17, 2013, 23 pages. |
Defendants' LPR 2.3 Initial Non-Infringement Contentions Exhibit A, dated May 17, 2013, 39 pages. |
Defendants' Unenforceability Contentions Pursuant to LPR 2.3, dated May 17, 2013, 13 pages. |
Defendants\Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims Responsive to Complaint, dated Apr. 5, 2012, 25 pages. |
English Transiation of JP H09-158677 published on Jun. 17, 1997, 2 pages. |
English Translation of Japanese Official Notice of Rejection mailed on Feb. 14, 2012 in JP Application No. 2009-172352, 3 pages. |
English Translation of JP 1998-152179 (H10-152179 A), published on Sep. 6, 1998, 6 pages. |
English Translation of JP 2001-114357 published on Apr. 24, 2001, 8 pages. |
English Translation of JP 2003-26224 published on Jan. 29, 2003, 13 pages. |
English Translation of JP H09-156677 published Jun. 17, 1995; 8 pgs. |
English Translation of JP Official Notice of Rejection mailed on Jan. 29, 2013 in JP Appl. No. 2008-087152 citing JPH0581083, 5 pages. |
European Packaging Pack Report, NR. May 5, 2001 and partial translation thereof, 6 pages. |
European Search Report, EP10305289 citing DE1848870U, 3 pages. |
European Search Report 06118142.6 dated May 3, 2007, citing DE90140656, 10 pages. |
Fuji Packaging GmbH Fachpack brochure, Oct. 11-12, 2001; 2 pgs. |
Giant Baby Wipes package, item No. 80203-91, resealable package having die cut-out portions (tabs) which remain affixed to the top of the package after label is withdrawn from the top, whereby tamper evidence is indicated by a misalignment of the die cut-out portions with the holes formed in the label. |
Global Brands' LPR 2.5 Initial Response to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions Chart Ex. A-1, dated May 31, 2013, 30 pages. |
Global Brands' LPR 2.5 Initial Response to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions Chart Ex. A-2, dated May 31, 2013, 20 pages. |
Global Brands' LPR 2.5 Initial Response to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions Chart Ex. A-3, dated May 31, 2013, 21 pages. |
Global Brands' LPR 2.5 Initial Response to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions Chart Ex. A-5, dated May 31, 2013, 14 pages. |
Global Brands LPR 2.5 Initial Response to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions Chart Ex. A-4, dated May 31, 2013, 17 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/EP2011/054250 dated Jun. 28, 2011, 3 pages. |
Machine translation of claim for BR 5500885-2 from Googletranslate.com; 1 pg. |
Machine translation of claim for BR 6202030-7 from Googletranslate.com; 1 pg. |
Machine translation of claim for BR 6804636-7 from Googletranslate.com; 1 pg. |
Machine translation of DE 202007005487, published Jun. 14, 2007, provided by Espacenet, 3 pages. |
Machine translation of DE9014065, published Mar. 19, 2009, provided by Espacenet, 9 pages. |
Machinery Update, Mar./Apr. 2002, pp. 56-62. |
Machinery Update, Sep./Oct. 2001, pp. 46-47. |
Opposition to EP1679269 filed by Awapatent AB, Heisingborg, Sweden. May 2, 2012. |
Opposition to EP1679269 filed by Bahlse GmbH and Co. KG, Apr. 30, 2012. |
Partial European Search Report for Appl. No. EP11155570 dated Jun. 12, 2011, citing DE9003401 and DE9005297, 9 pages. |
Plaintiffs Initial Response to Defendant's Initial Invalidity Contentions, dated May 31, 2013, 20 pages. |
Plaintiffs Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant, dated Apr. 26, 2013, 20 pages. |
Plaintiffs Complaint for Patent Infringement, dated Jan. 16, 2013, 7 pages. |
Reclosure system lengthens food life, Packaging News PPMA Preview, Sep. 2001, 4 pages. |
Reseal-It. Web page Internet print out accessed Mar. 14, 2005; 19 pages. |
English Translation of Japanese Unexamined Application Publication No. H9-156677, published Jul. 17, 1997; 6 pages. |
Kellogg's Reply Claim Construction Brief, dated Jan. 24, 2014, 19 pages. |
Kellogg's Opening Claim Construction Brief, dated Dec. 13, 2013, 30 pages. |
Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum of Law Regarding Additional Claim Construction Authority Requested by the Court, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 13 pages. |
Kellogg's Response to Plaintiff's Surreply Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to Docket No. 98, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 9 pages. |
Plaintiff Intercontinental Great Brands LLC's Submission of Authority Pursuant to Docket No. 98, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 11 pages. |
Plaintiff Intercontinental Great Brands LLC's Responsive Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to LPR 4.2, dated Feb. 10, 2014, 27 pages. |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division Memorandum Opinion and Order, dated Sep. 22, 2014, 12 pages. |
Plaintiff Intercontinental Great Brands LLC\s Surreply Claim Construction Brief Pursuant to Docket No. 98, dated Feb. 21, 2014, 6 pages. |
Additional Exhibits from Declaration of James Lukas Jr. filed Mar. 26, 2015, 73 pages. |
Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with Exhibits, Part 1 dated Mar. 23, 2015, 277 pages. |
Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment with Exhibits (redacted), dated May 28, 2015, 228 pages. |
Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment with Exhibits Part 1 (redacted), dated May 8, 2015, 400 pages. |
Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Reply in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment and Exhibit (unsealed), dated Jun. 10, 2015, 8 pages. |
Defendants' Consolidated Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted) with Exhibits A-G, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 166 pages. |
Defendants' Consolidated Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with Exhibits, dated May 28, 2015, 36 pages. |
Defendants' Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated Mar. 23, 2015, 75 pages. |
Defendants' LR 56.1 (b) (3) (C) Statement of Additional Material Facts in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated May 28, 2015, 30 pages. |
Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. 102 and/or 103, dated Mar. 26, 2015, 60 pages. |
Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to Compel Discovery, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 13 pages. |
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. 102 And/Or 103, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 4 pages. |
Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 3 pages. |
Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment, dated May 28, 2015, 108 pages. |
Exhibits, part 2, to Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, dated Mar. 23, 2015 125 pages. |
Exhibits, part 2, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated May 8, 2015, 300 pages. |
Exhibits, part 3, to Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 125 pages. |
Exhibits, part 3, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated May 8, 2015, 100 pages. |
Exhibits, part 4, to Declaration of James J. Lukas, Jr. in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with Exhibits, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 28 pages. |
Exhibits, part 4, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated May 8, 2015, 100 pages. |
Exhibits, part 5, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated May 8, 2015, 200 pages. |
Exhibits, part 6, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted),dated May 8, 2015, 300 pages. |
Exhibits, part 7, to Declaration of Katie Crosby Lehmann in Support of Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted),dated May 8, 2015, 136 pages. |
Exhibits from Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to Compel Discovery, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 68 pages. |
Exhibits from Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery, Oct. 15, 2014, 78 pages. |
Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, dated May 8, 2015, 54 pages. |
Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, dated Apr. 27, 2015, 4 pages. |
Plaintiff's LR 56.1(a) Response to Defendants' Statement of Additional Material Facts in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (redacted), dated Jun. 10, 2015, 39 pages. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery, Oct. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Plaintiff's Reply in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment, dated Jun. 1, 2015, 19 pages. |
Machine Translation of EP 1449789 description. Translated on Jun. 13, 2015, 18 pages. |
Defendant's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 75 pages. |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Memorandum Opinion and Order, dated Aug. 3, 2015, 37 pages. |
English Translation of JP2002-002805 filed by Onuma, published Sep. 1, 2012, translation provided by the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 11/193,614. |
English Translation of JP2006137445 filed by Shimomura, published Jun. 1, 2006, translation provided by the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 13/698,567. |
English Translation of JP2003-026224 published Jan. 29, 2003, translated on Jul. 27, 2015. Translation provided by USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/175,434, 9 pages. |
English Translation of JP2001-301807 published Oct. 31, 2001, translated on Jul. 27, 2015. Translation provided by USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/175,434, 6 pages. |
Definition of “end.” Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition. 1988 Simon & Schuster, cited by USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 11/193,614, dated Jan. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
Non-Confidential Brief For Plaintiff-Appellant Intercontinental Great Brands LLC, dated Dec. 30, 2015, 149 pages, filed with the Federal Circuit in Case Nos. 2015-2082, -2084 (litigation related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,918,532). |
Reply Brief of Defendants-Cross-Appellants; dated Oct. 14, 2016, 37 pages, filed with the Federal Circuit in Case Nos. 2015-2082, -2084. |
Non-Confidential Responsive/Reply Brief For Plaintiff-Appellant Intercontinental Great Brands LLC, dated Sep. 30, 2016; 69 pages, filed with the Federal Circuit in Case Nos. 2015-2082, -2084. |
Brief of Defendants-Cross-Appellants; dated Jun. 17, 2016; 86 pages, filed with the Federal Circuit in Case Nos. 2015-2082, -2084. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 16180214.5, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140079343 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61453872 | Mar 2011 | US |